Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket Jun 23 2020COG CLERK OF THE COUNCIL iC'OM Dana Brown -Davis, C.M.C. COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Suite #toy Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 gSF►1 (360) 778-5010 NG,�O WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL AGENDA REVISION NOTICE FOR DUNE 23, 2020 COUNCILMEMBERS Rud Browne Barry Buchanan Tyler Byrd Todd Donovan Ben Elenbaas CarolFrazey Kathy Kershner ONE ITEM HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AS FOLLOWS: Call to Order Roll Call Announcements The Council is currently holding all meetings remotely. View meeting schedules, agendas, minutes, videos, and archives at www.whatcom.legistar.com. For instructions on how to watch or participate in our meetings, please visit us at www.whatcomcounty.us/joinvirtualcouncil or contact the Council Office at 360.778.5010. Committee Discussion and Recommendation to Council 1. AB2020-106 Resolution docketing comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments Committee Discussion 1. AB2020-219 Discussion and update on strategies and other items related to COVID-19 ITEM ADDED 6.22.2020 2. AB2020-234 Discussion regarding goals, guidelines, and approach to updating current and future budgets Other Business Adjourn CLERK O F TH E CO U N CI L Dana Brown C.M.C. tG� M COG -Davis, SP ya COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3 311 Grand Avenue, Raite#105 Bellingham, WA 982254038 (360) 778-5010 10 WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL COMBINED AG E N DA PACKET FO R June 23, 2020 INCLUDES INFORMATION FOR THE FOLLOWING MEETINGS: SPECIAL COMMITTEE of the WHOLE (1:00 P.M.) CO U N Cl LM BN BERS Rud Browne Barry Buchanan Tyler Byrd Todd Donovan Ben Elenbaas Carol Frazey Kathy Kershner Whatcom County Council Special Committee of the Whole COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360) 778-5010 Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1PM Virtual Meeting AGENDA REVISED 6.22.2020 COUNCILMEMBERS Rud Browne Barry Buchanan Tyler Byrd Todd Donovan Ben Elenbaas Carol Frazey Kathy Kershner CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Dana Brown -Davis, C.M.C. Council Special Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda June 23, 2020 Call To Order Roll Call Announcements The Council is currently holding all meetings remotely. View meeting schedules, agendas, minutes, videos, and archives at www.whatcom.legistar.com. For instructions on how to watch or participate in our meetings, please visit us at www.whatcomcounty.us/joinvirtualcouncil or contact the Council Office at 360.778.5010. Committee Discussion and Recommendation to Council 1. AB2020-106 Resolution docketing comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments Committee Discussion 1. AB2020-219 Discussion and update on strategies and other items related to COVID-19 (Council and Health Board) ITEM ADDED 6.22.2020 2. AB2020-234 Discussion regarding goals, guidelines, and approach to updating current and future budgets Other Business Adiournment Whatcom County Pure 2 Printed on 211312025 File ID: AB2020-106 File Created: 02/24/2020 Department: Planning and Development Services Department Assigned to: Council Agenda Date: 07/07/2020 Whatcom County Agenda Bill Master Report File Number: AB2020-106 COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360)778-5010 Version: 1 Status: Approved Entered by: MAamot@co.whatcom.wa.us File Type: Resolution Primary Contact Email: maamot@co.whatcom.wa.us TITLE FOR AGENDA ITEM: Final Action: 07/07/2020 Enactment #: RES 2020-027 Resolution docketing comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments SUMMARY STATEMENT OR LEGAL NOTICE LANGUAGE: Whatcom County Code indicates that proposed comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments are to be docketed by the County Council. Planning and Development Services is forwarding a proposed resolution so that Council can determine which amendments to docket for further review. HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE FILE Date: Acting Body: Action: Sent To: 06/23/2020 Council Special Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL WITH PROPOSED AMENDMENT(S) Aye: 7 Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, Frazey, Elenbaas, and Kershner Nay: 0 07/07/2020 Council APPROVED Aye: 5 Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, and Frazey Nay: 1 Elenbaas Absent: 1 Kershner Whatcom County Page 1 Printed on 2/13/2025 Agenda Bill Master Report Continued (AB2020-106) Attachments: Agenda Bill Master Report, Approved Resolution 2020-027, Staff Memo, Draft Resolution, Exhibit A as amended 6.23.2020, Exhibit -A (Draft Docket), PLN2020-00001 application (revised), PLN2020-00002 (Six -Year CIP Application), PLN2020-00003 (NC to Residential Application), PLN2020-00004 (RF Mt Baker Hwy - Supplemental Info), PLN2020-00004 (RF Mt Baker Hwy application) Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 2/13/2025 File ID: AB2020-106 File Created: 02/24/2020 Department: Planning and Development Services Department Assigned to: Council Agenda Date: 07/07/2020 Whatcom County Agenda Bill Master Report File Number: AB2020-106 COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360)778-5010 Version: 1 Status: Approved Entered by: MAamot@co.whatcom.wa.us File Type: Resolution Primary Contact Email: maamot@co.whatcom.wa.us TITLE FOR AGENDA ITEM: Final Action: 07/07/2020 Enactment #: RES 2020-027 Resolution docketing comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments SUMMARY STATEMENT OR LEGAL NOTICE LANGUAGE: Whatcom County Code indicates that proposed comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments are to be docketed by the County Council. Planning and Development Services is forwarding a proposed resolution so that Council can determine which amendments to docket for further review. HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE FILE Date: Acting Body: Action: Sent To: 06/23/2020 Council Special Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL WITH PROPOSED AMENDMENT Aye: 7 Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, Frazey, Elenbaas, and Kershner Nay: 0 Absent: 0 07/07/2020 Council APPROVED Aye: 5 Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, and Frazey Nay: 1 Elenbaas Absent: 1 Kershner Whatcom County Page 1 Printed on 7/8/2020 Agenda Bill Master Report Continued (AB2020-106) Attachments: Staff Memo, Draft Resolution, Exhibit A as amended 6.23.2020, PLN2020-00001 application (revised), PLN2020-00002 (Six -Year CIP Application), PLN2020-00003 (NC to Residential Application), PLN2020-00004 (RF Mt Baker Hwy - Supplemental Info), PLN2020-00004 (RF Mt Baker Hwy application) Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 7/8/2020 om CoG �qSF/ IN �0 File ID: AB2020-106 File Created: 02/24/2020 Department: Planning and Development Services Department Whatcom County Agenda Bill Master Report File Number: AB2020-106 COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360) 778-5010 Version: 1 Status: Approved Entered by: MAamot@co.whatcom.wa.us File Type: Resolution Assigned to: Council Final Action: 07/07/2020 Agenda Date: 07/07/2020 Enactment #: RES 2020-027 Primary Contact Email: maamot@co.whatcom.wa.us TITLE FOR AGENDA ITEM: Resolution docketing comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments SUMMARY STATEMENT OR LEGAL NOTICE LANGUAGE: Whatcom County Code indicates that proposed comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments are to be docketed by the County Council. Planning and Development Services is forwarding a proposed resolution so that Council can determine which amendments to docket for further review. HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE FILE Date: Acting Body: Action: Sent To: 06/23/2020 Council Special Committee of the Whole RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL WITH PROPOSED AMENDMENT Aye: 7 Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, Frazey, Elenbaas, and Kershner Nay: 0 Absent: 0 07/07/2020 Council APPROVED Aye: 5 Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, and Frazey Nay: 1 Elenbaas Absent: 1 Kershner Whatcom County Page 1 Printed on 71812020 Agenda Bill Master Report Continued (AB2020-106) Attachments: Staff Memo, Draft Resolution, Exhibit A as amended 6.23.2020, PLN2020-00001 application (revised), PLN2020-00002 (Six -Year CIP Application), PLN2020-00003 (NC to Residential Application), PLN2020-00004 (RF Mt Baker Hwy - Supplemental Info), PLN2020-00004 (RF Mt Baker Hwy application) Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 71812020 Docket, 2/24/2020 Proposed by: Planning & Development Services Introduction date: 171=6308111163050[61�• DOCKETING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.470) requires the County to consider the proposed docket of comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments on at least an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the provisions of WCC 22.10.020 indicate that Comprehensive Plan and development regulation amendments are to be docketed for review by approval of a resolution by the County Council; and WHEREAS, the Whatcom County Planning and Development Services Department has forwarded a docket of proposed Comprehensive Plan and development regulation amendments to the County Council for consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Whatcom County Council hereby dockets for formal review the amendments shown on attached Exhibit A. APPROVED this nth day of ATTES Iy�s����@$0lttft9l€Q� � D'—a row 1-� c r(Dl Council approved electronically by Royce Buckhl 1�lam Civil Deputy Prosecutor 2020. WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON B y cha an, Council Chair N -o or or � pr o; OZ Oz o OZ O O O O N O O O O p ME- Ul N N �O p �O DN-0 Drnr ;D 13 > -on 3° 0 0 �.� ° 3 `� 0 3 oo� 3 ET C (D :3 �557 m �'<3 -� r nrn rD D°� ° � ; a_ to ,� a X a 3n3< CD , 3 0 (D :3 3 (D v n rt rD CD (D a rt ::3Q Ln rt O CD Q O O 77777777-77 O O 3 O Ort r-r CC C -Irt r t'M? rOy () •< n0 r�r n0 ((D n0 3 3 CD r*� 0(D 3 �:3 °_o-m 3 Ln(D0 Ln 3' g-*°(DC30v0)o_CD<a_3 z° 3 o v 0- o �� m 0) O O Q m n G_ m O rD cn N o, m 0X ° a. N n (D Q * N rat Lo .. -i m a -p p 0 a O rr T. a, ° -7 CD Q D C ,-r rt -' M Q r r a `"Di 00 =T �in rt ��' 3 ° ��� 3 0 0 O rt °< O O o N rt (D fD �• n �, z rt O �. CD a rt m O CD z 3 ° ° �� �Ln �M 3� oET ,m �, o �, �, O <y3 o o n o En DJ _�; CD -; W C O O C Lo O n CD COO (D N 0) " C 3 Oa a n a_ l< CD r r 3 `` fD rr O 0 CD O 01 X O (OD p N cn (D ° (D ' ❑) ° r r a- n 'O C a X O Q7 i C Ln N< O 7 a_ rt 0 rt r't' r r N o O) T� O to G a_ N ° C a a n 3 0 < co a ° ° °J ° n :3rD 0(D �a 3 0 oNa,(GD 3-0 o m �' o r0 o �_ -i N a rn (D — ( -1 X �. n r � N ❑1 ..� C O -s O (D N O O< 3 to = rOi a- (D v ° a) " a1 c a.Lo 3 O o) '< v � O LO CD �p Cu CD � cn n N CD (D D n -s ° -(D cn a < N v Q pi 01 n ° C) a (D (gyp G (D fD Ca. 0O =3 rD a Lo n � rr CD a, CD O N0na Q 0n n° O �a) zCO :3 O rtnO j Ln (n ° O CD 0 rr o alf (D (O Q Q cn Q :3 ;a :3 A 0) CD C a- �i (n i — Q a, z!5 Aa) p m O O Dz\��o 0 0�3 D v cn O: N rt N Q rr `G 4-1� 3 N °' rn n (D rD O Z u�i n a rt W N W O rt 3 O n O rD 00a Q 0 D D w OZ ON oZ ON oZ ON i` O f. O O O 1p t0 l0 N O (n O rp -h C p' C rD m O :3c O o- Cr-, ' c , .CF rOJ-0N Q m '< n m 3 n rDrD of �m ° WZ pnQ,o3rt rt 6 v �.. C, � v rr :3 2 v o O n rt O C O C 0 c 0 C O O C ^ 3 n r* rrti n r* n r* -< 3 0 x ;. O n O Z—m Ev DO °p�rr03-1O;rt��0 cn a)-0n 0) D =3 �a< b o-�m -� � 0 0 -s m m m m C m n aj Z) 3' m L m n O �� O- m m- a, 3 � O n�' m , rt rt r r m N Q rr �,n O + O m 3 rt m rnr C * N CD O 3Mat Q G rt rr < i :r-r3 m3 Q n O C O to m 7o O O O m rt 0 =— O N O O303 `�OrtQ�m z. o < m "no) n m -p =3 mrt N n-rtDi „ o � �mn�n o O < 60 omrtO �3 0 m z. O 3 N C 3 OO � T O r3y m<O (n a m O m 000 0)Q O m CD rt0 O Oo Q mdQp-0 O6Xm< 3 CDmm COOm 6 o CD rt `< o0? n (n o O o o CD n n 3 O o n Q m p cl-pm O rt N0 O m 3 — 3 3 m m < O m° O O rt O 3rtrtO"J ��( moo X to�Nc�: mrt 3�� �n°�(D ���rmmm� o� ��3.r*Ln, n v n,o , O�° aom�c°1n� :3 0- r6D N m Ln m r* 7 O O- 3 rt O C (Drt O a 2 m lfl 0 rt N O Q r�r p1 :(D m N � m O' O O 0) � 3 �n m O O O 0- rt m U O m n n v O D =3 r. Q Q cr m m N O z o z O z w O N O N O N 00 O p O p W OD 00 L c o o -a y (D3 O O N 273 n fit° �� ? (D I m :3 rt U G '�� O O 0) O :3 0r) D rt 0 :3rt n ai n 0) rt cn ! N -I n 0) ,a CD w Ort --o O D 3 Di0) z O O N• n -rtrt C 3 0) (D D C O (D O=3(D CD n Mtort77 a � a O rr �1 nCi O 0) < < art �N(D "C *LO, OCD V O 03(D �� n • rt n CDrt CD :3N 0 ' torta)j QN 3 0) 0) CD O 0 Zr O rt 3_ a (� � D 6(D 3 O c 7 rt a CAD N cn _ O Ln O O fD c CD CD 0) -o N O `G n Vf rt O l< rt O 0) 0) O O N rnr 7 O1 n N a rt rt Q n r r -_s O n 0) 6 `< � Q�� O O C n< Q O �' CD - p a a� v O rt_ (On n LO =r O N c fD n o 3 6-- c N O O ca. p a) n Oo- OO O O D vLO n O _ n W (D p w O n cc _ O a' U) CD O D rt -h CDOUO rt :3 O CD 7 rt CD O O a 0) O to rr a rt < - rt 3 (Da LO rt �. 0) to a (n rt a O w O '< rt -� (D O (D O r r O) c VI f�D a< D a (D (D n O (D O Q O rt O 0) 3 O O rt rt a 4 O00 'a rt -• Q p rt ON rt 0) O s ,�. -O O 0) N ((DD 7 O O G CD C _ �n-�a� o�,�'v� Z -aa oafl-3 (D(DmtD cn(Dirt cooaO3c3aa)M . c c ` O (D O) - n -e, n 0) ko=Yw O 0) o) (D Ln :3 (D (D =3-*(o OD w rt fD n. (O r�r rt (D Ln (D 0- O n (D < X rmi .< 0) G. O _ rt cn rt O 0_) r Oa 3 rt �'a O (aD O 01 -' S r" n rt O O" O 0 O Q c 0 0) D (D 0) � c O O 0 � O O O n to N LO CD a '� a v �, O CD 0; N c N O0 6 O 3 O to rt Z � Z o D CD (D D m v � o c Z. o rt O) (D O) D D D CD fD Ul or- or- or- Or- or o z o z o z o z o z ON ON ON ON ON -4t O O O CD� O 00 CD Ol V GO 00 W o 3 c D D� O Ln Q 70 ai 0) -s cn O Lo (D 0 CDO Z rr 3 Ln :3n O rt O 7 ° z °- 3 m O Gi 6 (D O• N rr�Tl"e n (D rt p O En Ln O ET n O O 0 0 0 0 0 rt n 'rt< '< O O o Oo ' 3 3 3 n `° 3 o' n o S` (D a) (a.cn r r C to (D Lp' O s cn 0) r r-0 D �_ O CD 3 n-0 CD (n n o) D p ? CD O O 3 7 -+ m y O (D CD � =s' < n -` 3 O a p — 3 n n (D rt N-i— (D CO O (D N <_ (D CD C c N= (D C O O ray `< O n ° O �G rOt O O +. r* (D fl1 r r O n r0r lfl D 3 n1 rt C- r* ODN O CD O `G O Q C < N rt C 0 (D ry v❑1 ) p n rt n — O n CD (DO . D Na nQ ° n OO - C Q O Ort(n .p rt(n 3NC�D O— O O 3 =CLn0— Orr3Ort i� C D �< O 3� n 3 CD :3 -n (QCDD fD �o° O °� r-r O G(o�3 ca. (DD Di O rt O o 3 N• n o�Ln -00 :300 a n o rt O -Q) O _0 D D �(Dj =O mac° rtrt — < p 0) —'< n rtO� KC CD (D < U• (DO W W C —n n ° (D O rt Q (D 6 rt-' CL `-r ° < on) — O Q ( nCD w O t n n 0 0 N C F x .< n 0 rt c O N O 0 n N 3 N O N (D v (gyp O n o (Cp W M M Zr N m�o�-(Dm3cn to N O n n � -, _+, O CD �. cn��(rtp o° n°a-�0)v�, O CD D r•r :* fll p (D N n 3 3 p Q 1l O ��< (n 0 N (D 6T1O r2 (D cn nCD rt n'N O1 n O 3 it (D En Z z 3 Z D On C D (D D O Q :. (D r r C D D D D D Da; {D 92 -o r v -0 Oz ozozoz Oz CD O N O N O N O N O N O O O O I O N O O O I-N W �-- I--` �-. O 0 �. � Lil M � 011 ao DDo ". 0 --h o_ M(D0) co ° n �m� 0. Lo ' co N ::30 r-r_ ° a c c D rt Z 3 (Drt 3 O O O fD v O CD CD l< N :37 (n Ln rO-r r Ln L rt CD G < 0 0 O0 d� -� :3 r- rt n :3 rt rt n rt rt n' 3 3 3 r+, -s CD O -� -h (n N O (n CD O C O fD N O O. O r-r O 6 CD w O A N < Cp 6 rD n C N 0 7 O O C° CD ❑1 Q w 'z O C• 6 Cl1 r* N 7, N O N' O Cp' CD rnt W O Ci O. 3 _ rt 0 ° m O° w 0- fin' n n w 0 a r- �< 3 ° rt j CD o; O o. C3D LO p) 0 O O r�r M (n � n O C CD CD r-rt, O O O n. rt rn-r, (n - _ O O O CD CD _ C o_ C rt C ns �. ai - r �{ '< — o O rt O0 rt rOr N 0 0 o- � O 3 0 o Q) C (n CD rt 3 O' n ° 0-E - ri O n to ° N -00 _< - 6 '� D Dv O r) N O 0 CD O O n n n 0� CD O (n N <_ O 01 N o_ W 0 3 M CD Ln O rt v O n O O0 moo 3 mrt�rN`nc�no,:3 (n 3°~'m' C C CD 3CD-" cn rt cD _ O Ln Ln ° 3 0 (D o rt C n O< �' O rt t-+ rt tOn Q ,< CD Q n O O_' CD (n c o' N CD 3 to O n O? �O (rtD N O ° fD O SOD n O. n O 1° lO o Q 0 co 0 rt CD '* O o 3 rt 3 �, C 0 3° c tO 3 CC 0 O rOr 6 rt CD rt n rr, �_ (D ° CD O CD n0 rt O� C n F- 'O G CD 3 ° ° C < n ° N O O O n X 7 O C7 �' M O rt CD 3 o 0 Cp' CAD N (7 M v �_ CC C O C O rt 3 CD I` Ln O Q O o -s 0 o-rt ° O `� cn rt Ln N z CD O ao, v rt r-r 0 > CD-�0 n m ��° Dn umi o.`� No ono n O BCD G rt o=° O C M to O QUl rnn O _ 0 `� O 0 o x rt ° 3 o° C� 3 rn O 0 0 CD O CD N rt O 0r. CD (D � a°, N ; O CD O- (7 to O C O E'' Q - n cn vi ° 0- � CD O (n O O O O D• N n N Q O O - Uf Cr CO M o n, 0 _ ° r-r3 �n rtn� ° c °'� rn o co 0 0cl. n�,m O O o r.t O O CD CD fll - N° N CD O rt Ci 0) D CD V) CD -P N o n N O rt :30 O CD z z z z ri D D D D '0 0! CD cD CD; J o r- ro Oz oz ca O N Pi O N 00 F. 0 ",I F. Cr+ �j Cn r+ N (.jJ � fl1 �. rD CL CD'; rD c 6- 30 if FT- ` rD n C MO CA rt m o, rt :3 O n a- 3 O O `3 rD•r rt rt rt- •; 3 3 d rt rt N O UI p (D(DrD C (7 70 'o Q 01 D to O" O" O O rD M. (D O CD O �����0,��0_0� 0 0 n 0 0 rtLOp0(D CD Q O 3�O0�o _ ❑1 = . �, r=t n rD rr Q 3 CD C O :' O _. O rt n. — O 0— r r O N n n O a Cl-O- 07 -0 0 p Q , cn 3 O n �' O rt r0r n a`. (D CD rt O 3 to O O r* (D O -' c O O- a O Q(D (D 3 0-m O N V 3Q(D aN_(D 3 _ Q O O N �, rr O N o C C 7 C 0 N rD rt O Q) Cp IN �< Q N rt '0 CD3 0 �,t� O O N W n rt Q O Q rD � 70 rD �_ '-" �_ O ON 7 n DJ O 0 m m rt n O O N cn 0 0 lQ 0 0 �I O O O O- 3 0 0) O O 7' O n -O v O rt O �. u) n o � to r-r Co rt O O m O -n (D rt n (n Q N 0 0 n O ~, O n Q W O ccn En Q 3 O D cn v 01 r* n O rD C n• O (D O r-r � CD (D n -s O rD O 3 rD n v N Q3 vo^p0 0- Lo O U) �'o��� �_ fll rt — MN(D ((DD 2 O O O o v Ln O -� N� C O n C r � 0) c n, cn O cn m e < O Q :3 5 rr 3 N Q D EX Q C r0—t N 7' N N E 3. 7 n Ort r�i (D � rD O p 3 a) ETO rt O N: U, zr O lO 3 CD (D O (OD r O O1 n O N' rt 3 N CD Q O Q V' Q ,Q fL °i O (n n r r n� 3 O 50 v' O' LO O 3 O n O C Q D 0 0 `0 O Q n r 0 =r D c °rt' N rt 0 to _. O ry p_ rD cn o ; j 0 n) � cn rr 0 3 (D � Lo o, ° g o CD V C p O O O 0 3— rD (D rt C (D r)N — N n. � 0 < C)fl� CD O CD to (D ' (D Ln O �D rhz-?. c Ln -� o D . o, ET � =3 c — cn �_ (D 0) ET O rt OL CL O ems, 0 O Z D. N: O O to r N o � rtX rt � O G) m (D y N< O — Di (D _3 X 90 rt D rt- C O-O 3?M rtCD D d' CD — CL :30 �_ �. W -0 CD LO to rt ' rt O 3 . n n o C 3 n — "• (n rtL. CD CD O N o= � to rt< O C rt 3 n O O Pt r�r o O rt w r "C �_ lfl CD O N�� C — �, rt of O tp Ort 'o _0 rt CD — rt W rt ❑7 X O CD Ln :3 O ZZ) N o to I N CD -. �� Q� < rt O Q� no 3 O n o ° °' w -O O CD rt 3 d m a m C cn Ort N (�D ;a (n O to CD 70 -s r- Q � � 0 3 CD -0 O c- o o c o a D cOii N �' 0 m m 0^ Ort rD cn v " m n 3 to — I. 0-0 CD N O o :3= CD :30 :3 to O� Z3 LL rt (n C' AD Crt CD N (DCD O cn O rt O O O CD 0 rt n o O 3 CD ray p) CD Lo rt 7ocn �wv' m n ^ O D r O rt0 `^ O CD N r Pi W * . I z A o_ o\ rt z CD D {D " WHATCOM COUNTY Mark Personius, AICP Planning & Development Services Director 5280 Northwest Drive Bellingham, WA 98226-9097 360-778-5900, TTY 800-833-6384 360-778-5901 Fax Memorandum TO: The Honorable Satpal Sidhu, Whatcom County Executive The Honorable Whatcom County Council FROM: Matt Aamot, Senior Plannery?� THROUGH: Mark Personius, Director 9-? DATE: February 24, 2020 SUBJECT: Docketing Comp Plan & Development Regulation Amendments Pursuant to state and local law, proposed comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments are docketed for further review by the County Council each year. This year, there are seven new applications and a number of previous applications (initiated in past years) on the proposed docket. New Applications Whatcom County has submitted or received new proposals relating to the following topics for consideration in 2020: • Point Roberts Special District - Moratorium and Economic Assessment • Capital Facilities Planning • Neighborhood Commercial to Residential Rezone • Rural Forestry Designation and Text Amendment (Nooksack Falls) • Whatcom County Code Amendments • Shoreline Program Update • Countywide Planning Policy Amendments The Council should determine which of the above proposals to docket for further review in 2020. Docketed amendments will be submitted for SEPA review, evaluated by the Planning Department, and go to a public hearing before the Planning Commission prior to returning to the County Council for a final decision. If an amendment is not docketed by Council, it will not go forward. Fee waivers have been requested for the Point Roberts Special District, Neighborhood Commercial to Residential Rezone, and the Rural Forestry Designation and Text Amendment (Nooksack Falls) applications. WCC 22.10.020(3)(b) states: "... When docketing an application, the county council may waive the application fees if it finds the proposed amendment would clearly benefit the community as a whole." The Council may docket these amendments without waiving the approximately $9,640 in fees, docket the amendments and waive the fees, or choose not to docket the amendments. Previous Applications In addition to the new applications, the following projects were docketed for review in previous years. They are included in the proposed resolution, as review has not been completed: • Mineral Resource Lands Expansion - Breckenridge Rd. • Lummi Island Ferry Amendments • Density Credit Program - Zoning Code Amendments • Point Roberts Subarea Plan and Point Roberts Special District • Surface Mining Pipeline Buffer • Surface Mining of Dry Meander Zones • Density Credit Program - Comprehensive Plan Amendments • Repeal Cherry Point -Ferndale Subarea Plan • Critical Areas Ordinance - On -Going Agriculture • Wind Energy System Amendments • Cherry Point Amendments • Sustainable Salmon Harvest Goal • Mineral Resource Lands - County -wide Designation Process; • Wireless Communication Facilities; • Sign Regulations Update; • Vacation Rental Regulations; • Code Enforcement Amendments; • Boundary Line Adjustments; • Weddings and Special Events; • Agricultural Strategic Plan Implementation; and • Mineral Resource Lands Expansion - North Star Rd. Thank you for your consideration of the proposed resolution. We look forward to discussing it with you. 2 Docket, 2/24/2020 Proposed by: Planning & Development Services Introduction date: RESOLUTION NO. DOCKETING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.470) requires the County to consider the proposed docket of comprehensive plan and development regulation amendments on at least an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the provisions of WCC 22.10.020 indicate that Comprehensive Plan and development regulation amendments are to be docketed for review by approval of a resolution by the County Council; and WHEREAS, the Whatcom County Planning and Development Services Department has forwarded a docket of proposed Comprehensive Plan and development regulation amendments to the County Council for consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Whatcom County Council hereby dockets for formal review the amendments shown on attached Exhibit A. APPROVED this day of ATTEST Dana Brown -Davis, Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: Civil Deputy Prosecutor 2020. WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON Barry Buchanan, Council Chair EXHIBIT A — Docket File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Granted? PLN2020 Capital Facilities Plannin Whatcom County Amend the capital facilities element of the Whatcom County -wide -00002 County Comprehensive Plan, including the Six -Year Ca ital Im rovement Pro ram (Appendix F . PLN2020 Neighborhood Charles P. Vogel & George Johnson Rezone approximately 1.25 acres from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Residential Rural Parcel #'s 380127 456016, 380127 457023, and No -0000:3 Commercial to Residential Rezone (RR-1). 380127 455009. Within the SE 1/4 of section 27, T38N, R1E, W.M. PLN2020 Rural Forestry Ali Taysi / AVT Consulting Amend the comprehensive plan designation from Parcel #'s 400831 580150, 400831 450200, and No -00004 Designation and Text Amendment - Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) to Rural Forestry on approximately 66 acres in the Nooksack Falls exclave (off Mt. Baker Hwy). Amend the Zoning 390806 550550; Within section 31, Nooksack Falls Code to allow certain conditional uses in the Nooksack Falls exclave within the Rural Forestry T40N, R8E, and section 6, T39N, R8E zone (WCC 20.42.155). W.M. PLN2020 Whatcom County Code Whatcom County Review and revise the Whatcom County Zoning Code N/A N/A -00005 and other sections of the County Code to implement Amendments Comprehensive Plan policies and/or address issues identified in the administration of the codes. Revisions needed to achieve consistency with the Growth Management Act may also be considered. PLN2020 Shoreline Program Update Whatcom County Update the Whatcom County Shoreline Management N/A N/A -00006 Program (Title 23). Move the goals and policies of the Shoreline Management Program to the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Granted? PLN2020 Countywide Planning Policy Whatcom County Amend the Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs) by N/A -00007 adding new sections relating to the Review and Amendments Evaluation Program (Buildable Lands), Dispute Resolution Procedures, and Countywide Planning Policy Amendment Procedures. The CWPPs are inserted into Appendix C of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. PLN2019 MRL Expansion Concrete Amend the comprehensive plan designation from Parcel # No -00002 - Breckenridge Nor'West Rural to Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) and amend 400428 165430 and Rd. the zoning map to expand a MRL overlay zone on a portion of parcel # approximately 22.8 acres off Breckenridge Rd., east 400428 254460; of Nooksack. The underlying zoning is Rural one Within the NW 1/4 and dwelling/five acres (R5A). NE 1/4 of section 28, T40N, R4E, W.M. PLN2019 Lummi Island Whatcom Amend Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan N/A N/A -00004 Ferry County provisions relating to the Lummi Island Ferry. Modify Amendments Policy 6A-1 relating to ferry level of service and delete Policy 6C-9 relating to a ferry feasibility study as shown in Resolution 2018-026. PLN2019 Density Credit Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Zoning Code to Birch Bay and other N/A -00005 Program - County implement the following recommendations contained areas of the county Zoning Code in the TDR/PDR Multi -Stakeholder Work Group Final Amendments Report dated October 3, 2018: (1) modify the UR4 zone in the Birch Bay Urban Growth Area to allow increased density if density credits are purchased and (2) modify the code to allow larger accessory dwelling unit size if density credits are purchased. File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Granted? Amendments issues the pelicies and/OF addFess Growth Management Act be may alse censideFed. PLN2019 Point Roberts Whatcom Review and, if needed, revise the Point Roberts Point Roberts N/A -00007 Subarea Plan County Subarea Plan and the Point Roberts Special District and Point (WCC 20m72)m Roberts Special District PLN2019 Surface Mining Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Countywide N/A -00010 Pipeline Buffer County and Whatcom County Code to determine the Council minimum safe distance to allow surface mining to be conducted from a petroleum pipeline to ensure a pipeline will not become exposed or rupture during an earthquake event and contaminate an aquifer. Determination should be based on independent sources where possible and assume a magnitude 9.0 or greater earthquake could occur. PLN2019 Surface Mining Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Countywide N/A -00011 of Dry County and Whatcom County Code to allow the seasonal Meander Council extraction of sand and gravel from dry upland areas Zones located within the 1,000 year meander zone of the Nooksack River, provided that such extraction has no negative impact on salmon spawning habitat. The intent is to (a) reduce the conversion of land currently used for farming, forestry and wildlife habitat into gravel pits, and (b) safely remove some File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Granted? of the significant sediment load that enters the Nooksack every year in an effort to reduce flooding and the need to build higher flood prevention berms along the river as the climate continues to change. PLN2018 Density Credit Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan to N/A N/A -00002 Program - County reflect a shift in emphasis from a traditional transfer Comprehensive of development rights program to a density credit Plan program. Density credits allow development Amendments incentives, such as increased density, in exchange for a voluntary contribution towards preserving agricultural lands and open space. PLN2018 Repeal Cherry Whatcom Repeal the Cherry Point -Ferndale Subarea Plan, Cherry Point- N/A -00003 Point -Ferndale County which was adopted in 1981. The proposal would Ferndale Subarea Subarea Plan also amend related provisions in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. PLN2018 CAO Whatcom The Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) was adopted by N/A N/A -00005 On -Going County the County Council in December 2017 (Ordinance Agriculture 2017-077). Section 4(a) of this Ordinance states "Planning and Development Services staff shall work with the farming community to develop creative solutions that would allow farmers to maintain or attain 'ongoing agriculture' status pursuant to applicable laws. Proposed code amendments to the Critical Areas Ordinance related to ongoing agriculture shall be processed with all due haste, but the first proposal shall be brought to Council for consideration no later than July 1, 2018." File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Granted? PLN2018 Wind Energy Whatcom Review and, if needed, revise WCC 20.14 Wind N/A N/A -00008 System County Energy Systems. Amendments Planning Commission PLN2018 Cherry Point Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Cherry Point UGA N/A -00009 Amendments County and Whatcom County Code to address ways the Council County may limit the negative impacts on public safety, transportation, the economy, and the environment from crude oil, coal, liquefied petroleum gases, and natural gas exports from the Cherry Point Urban Growth Area, in accordance with Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Policy 2CC- 16. PLN2018 Sustainable Whatcom Amend the Comprehensive Plan to create a new N/A N/A -00010 Salmon County policy to work with Lummi and Nooksack Nations, Harvest Goal Council the State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and other stakeholders to establish a sustainable salmon harvest goal for the county. PLN2017 MRL County- Whatcom Through a county -led countywide assessment, seek County -wide N/A -00004 wide County to identify and designate potential commercially Designation significant mineral resource lands, to meet future Process demand, compatible with water resources, agricultural lands, forest lands and other GMA goals pursuant to Comprehensive Plan Policy 8R-1. PLN2016 Wireless Whatcom Review and update provisions in WCC 20.13 N/A N/A -00006 Communication County (Wireless Communication Facilities) to ensure Facilities consistency with: (1) New 2015 FCC rules (80 FR File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Granted? 1238) which are designed to implement and enforce Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 and (2) New 2018 FCC rules entitled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment." PLN2016 Sign Whatcom Review and revise Whatcom County Code 20.80.400 N/A N/A -00009 Regulations County (Sign Regulations), including updating the code for Update consistency with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015). PLN2014 Vacation Whatcom Amend Whatcom County Code Title 20 (Zoning) & N/A N/A -00020 Rental County Title 23 (Shoreline Management Program) to allow PLN2016 Regulations vacation rentals under certain conditions as a use -00011 within certain zones and shoreline designations. PLN2015 Code Whatcom Create a new Whatcom County Code (WCC) Chapter N/A N/A -00003 Enforcement County 22.15, called "Code Compliance Procedures" to Amendments establish an efficient system to address enforcement of building, critical areas and zoning codes. The proposal would consolidate the existing code enforcement provisions from WCC 15, 16.16, and 20 into a new WCC 22.15. The proposed amendments include provisions that would allow the County to record a document at the Whatcom Auditor's office indicating that there is a code violation on a property. PLN2014 Boundary Line Jay Irwin Amend Section 20.83.110 of the Whatcom County N/A N/A -00001 Adjustments Zoning Ordinance relating to boundary line adjustments. The amendment would allow boundary File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Granted? line adjustments to nonconforming parcels to resolve encroachments such as fences, trees and other occupational indicators. The amendment would also allow boundary line adjustments that modify the boundaries between two nonconforming parcels based upon land owner preferences, as long as the smallest parcel is not decreased in size. PLN2014 Weddings and Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Zoning Ordinance to N/A N/A -00016 Special Events County allow "Weddings and Special Events" in specific zone districts through a conditional use permit. Amend WCC 20.97 to define "Special Events" and amend the parkingspace requirements in WCC 20.80.580. nI nI ',�i PLN2G1� A/ \..,,�� These amendments AI /A ���,�,..,,}} Bellingham UGA Ctall-1-.rd� �TQTTq-pTGf3 ngham epment Standards fer the Bellingham Urban Grewth Area PLN2012 Agricultural Whatcom Resolution 2018-027 was approved by the County Proposal relates to N/A -00007 Strategic Plan County Council on 8/8/2018 declaring support for the Agricultural and Implementatio updated Whatcom County Agricultural Strategic Rural lands n Plan. Immediate priorities in this plan include reviewing designation of Agricultural Lands of Long- term Commercial Significance and the agricultural zoning code. Reviewing the Rural Study Areas as listed in the 2007 Rural Land Study and making recommendations for possible changes in accordance with Resolution 2009-040 (100,000 acre target), Resolution 2018-027 (Updated Agricultural Strategic Plan) and RCW 36.70A.170 and .177 will be included. Other short-term and medium -term priorities in this plan include development of policies File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Granted? and regulations that provide for protection of the best agricultural areas while supporting development at zoned densities and continued work on development of the Natural Resource Marketplace. These activities may lead to proposed changes to the agricultural portions of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations. PLN2012 MRL Expansion Ferndale Amend the comprehensive plan designation from Parcel # N/A -00009 - North Star Ready Mix & Rural to Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) and amend 390110 212100; Rd. Gravel the zoning map to expand a MRL overlay zone on Within the SW 1/4 of approximately 19.7 acres on the west side of North section 10, T39N, Star Rd., south of Brown Rd. The underlying zoning R1E, W.M. is Rural one dwelling/five acres (R5A). EXHIBIT A — Docket File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Requested? PLN2020 Point Roberts Point Roberts Immediate moratorium of the Point Roberts Special Point Roberts Yes -00001 Special District Independent District (WCC 20.72), except for Sections 20.72.400 Moratorium and Business Council (Height limitations) and 20.72.653 (Landscaping Economic Assessment screening, and tree canopy retention), until a hearing examiner process is able to comprehensively assess the economic impacts and the overall efficacy of this Whatcom County Code. PLN2020 Capital Facilities Planning Whatcom County Amend the capital facilities element of the Whatcom County -wide -00002 County Comprehensive Plan, including the Six -Year Capital Improvement Program (Appendix F . PLN2020 Neighborhood Charles P. Vogel & George Johnson Rezone approximately 1.25 acres from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Residential Rural Parcel #'s 380127 456016, 380127 457023, and Yes -00003 Commercial to Residential Rezone RR-1 . 380127 455009. Within the SE 1/4 of section 27, T38N, R1E, W.M. PLN2020 Rural Forestry Ali Taysi / AVT Consulting Amend the comprehensive plan designation from Parcel #'s 400831 580150, 400831 450200, and Yes -00004 Designation and Text Amendment - Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) to Rural Forestry on approximately 66 acres in the Nooksack Falls exclave (off Mt. Baker Hwy). Amend the Zoning 390806 550550; Within section 31, Nooksack Falls Code to allow certain conditional uses in the Nooksack Falls exclave within the Rural Forestry T40N, R8E, and section 6, T39N, R8E zone (WCC 20.42.155). W.M. PLN2020 Whatcom County Code Amendments Whatcom County Review and revise the Whatcom County Zoning Code N/A N/A -00005 and other sections of the County Code to implement Comprehensive Plan policies and/or address issues File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Requested? identified in the administration of the codes. Revisions needed to achieve consistency with the Growth Management Act may also be considered. PLN2020 Shoreline Program Update Whatcom County Update the Whatcom County Shoreline Management N/A -00006 Program (Title 23). Move the goals and policies of the Shoreline Management Program to the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. PLN2020 Countywide Planning Policy Whatcom County Amend the Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs) by N/A fL -0000-7 adding new sections relating to the Review and Amendments Evaluation Program (Buildable Lands), Dispute Resolution Procedures, and Countywide Planning Policy Amendment Procedures. The CWPPs are inserted into Appendix C of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. PLN2019 -00002 MRL Expansion - Breckenridge Rd. Concrete Nor'West Amend the comprehensive plan designation from Rural to Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) and amend the zoning map to expand a MRL overlay zone on approximately 22.8 acres off Breckenridge Rd., east of Nooksack. The underlying zoning is Rural one dwelling/five acres (R5A). Parcel # 400428 165430 and a portion of parcel # 400428 254460; Within the NW 1/4 and NE 1/4 of section 28, T40N, R4E, W.M. No PLN2019 -00004 Lummi Island Ferry Amendments Whatcom County Amend Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan provisions relating to the Lummi Island Ferry. Modify Policy 6A-1 relating to ferry level of service and delete Policy 6C-9 relating to a ferry feasibility study as shown in Resolution 2018-026. N/A N/A File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Requested? PLN2019 Density Credit Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Zoning Code to Birch Bay and other N/A -00005 Program - County implement the following recommendations contained areas of the county Zoning Code in the TDR/PDR Multi -Stakeholder Work Group Final Amendments Report dated October 3, 2018: (1) modify the UR4 zone in the Birch Bay Urban Growth Area to allow increased density if density credits are purchased and (2) modify the code to allow larger accessory dwelling unit size if density credits are purchased. PLN2G-1-9 -0000f3 Wrn Geunty GeEle Wn Gethy Review if the Whateeng County Nd _p WA and, needed, revise the pelicies and/er address Growth Managengent Aet be may alse considered. PLN2019 Point Roberts Whatcom Review and, if needed, revise the Point Roberts Point Roberts N/A -00007 Subarea Plan County Subarea Plan and the Point Roberts Special District and Point (WCC 20.72). Roberts Special District PLN2019 Surface Mining Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Countywide N/A -00010 Pipeline Buffer County and Whatcom County Code to determine the Council minimum safe distance to allow surface mining to be conducted from a petroleum pipeline to ensure a pipeline will not become exposed or rupture during an earthquake event and contaminate an aquifer. Determination should be based on independent sources where possible and assume a magnitude 9.0 or greater earthquake could occur. File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Requested? PLN2019 Surface Mining Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Countywide N/A -00011 of Dry Meander County and Whatcom County Code to allow the seasonal Zones Council extraction of sand and gravel from dry upland areas located within the 1,000 year meander zone of the Nooksack River, provided that such extraction has no negative impact on salmon spawning habitat. The intent is to (a) reduce the conversion of land currently used for farming, forestry and wildlife habitat into gravel pits, and (b) safely remove some of the significant sediment load that enters the Nooksack every year in an effort to reduce flooding and the need to build higher flood prevention berms along the river as the climate continues to change. PLN2018 Density Credit Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan to N/A N/A -00002 Program - County reflect a shift in emphasis from a traditional transfer Comprehensive of development rights program to a density credit Plan program. Density credits allow development Amendments incentives, such as increased density, in exchange for a voluntary contribution towards preserving agricultural lands and open space. PLN2018 Repeal Cherry Whatcom Repeal the Cherry Point -Ferndale Subarea Plan, Cherry Point- N/A -00003 Point -Ferndale County which was adopted in 1981. The proposal would Ferndale Subarea Subarea Plan also amend related provisions in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. PLN2018 CAO Whatcom The Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) was adopted by N/A N/A -00005 On -Going County the County Council in December 2017 (Ordinance Agriculture 2017-077). Section 4(a) of this Ordinance states File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Requested? "Planning and Development Services staff shall work with the farming community to develop creative solutions that would allow farmers to maintain or attain ongoing agriculture' status pursuant to applicable laws. Proposed code amendments to the Critical Areas Ordinance related to ongoing agriculture shall be processed with all due haste, but the first proposal shall be brought to Council for consideration no later than July 1, 2018." PLN2018 Wind Energy Whatcom Review and, if needed, revise WCC 20.14 Wind N/A N/A -00008 System County Energy Systems. Amendments Planning Commission PLN2018 Cherry Point Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Cherry Point UGA N/A -00009 Amendments County and Whatcom County Code to address ways the Council County may limit the negative impacts on public safety, transportation, the economy, and the environment from crude oil, coal, liquefied petroleum gases, and natural gas exports from the Cherry Point Urban Growth Area, in accordance with Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Policy 2CC- 16. PLN2018 Sustainable Whatcom Amend the Comprehensive Plan to create a new N/A N/A -00010 Salmon Harvest County policy to work with Lummi and Nooksack Nations, Goal Council the State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and other stakeholders to establish a sustainable salmon harvest goal for the county. File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Requested? PLN2017 MRL County- Whatcom Through a county -led countywide assessment, seek County -wide N/A -00004 wide County to identify and designate potential commercially Designation significant mineral resource lands, to meet future Process demand, compatible with water resources, agricultural lands, forest lands and other GMA goals pursuant to Comprehensive Plan Policy 8R-1. PLN2016 Wireless Whatcom Review and update provisions in WCC 20.13 N/A N/A -00006 Communication County (Wireless Communication Facilities) to ensure Facilities consistency with: (1) New 2015 FCC rules (80 FR 1238) which are designed to implement and enforce Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 and (2) New 2018 FCC rules entitled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment." PLN2016 Sign Whatcom Review and revise Whatcom County Code 20.80.400 N/A N/A -00009 Regulations County (Sign Regulations), including updating the code for Update consistency with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015). PLN2014 Vacation Rental Whatcom Amend Whatcom County Code Title 20 (Zoning) & N/A N/A -00020 Regulations County Title 23 (Shoreline Management Program) to allow PLN2016 vacation rentals under certain conditions as a use -00011 within certain zones and shoreline designations. PLN2015 Code Whatcom Create a new Whatcom County Code (WCC) Chapter N/A N/A -00003 Enforcement County 22.15, called "Code Compliance Procedures" to Amendments establish an efficient system to address enforcement of building, critical areas and zoning codes. The proposal would consolidate the existing code File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Requested? enforcement provisions from WCC 15, 16.16, and 20 into a new WCC 22.15. The proposed amendments include provisions that would allow the County to record a document at the Whatcom Auditor's office indicating that there is a code violation on a property. PLN2014 Boundary Line Jay Irwin Amend Section 20.83.110 of the Whatcom County N/A N/A -00001 Adjustments Zoning Ordinance relating to boundary line adjustments. The amendment would allow boundary line adjustments to nonconforming parcels to resolve encroachments such as fences, trees and other occupational indicators. The amendment would also allow boundary line adjustments that modify the boundaries between two nonconforming parcels based upon land owner preferences, as long as the smallest parcel is not decreased in size. PLN2014 Weddings and Whatcom Amend the Whatcom County Zoning Ordinance to N/A N/A -00016 Special Events County allow "Weddings and Special Events" in specific zone districts through a conditional use permit. Amend WCC 20.97 to define "Special Events" and amend the parkin space requirements in WCC 20.80.580. nI nI -�n1 PLN2G1� �m A \�,/.,1 These a d R w,. nts T�T� 0000 STQITAQTGf3 .., Gebinty elate tom, the File # File Name Applicant Description Location Fee Waiver Requested? PLN2012 Agricultural Whatcom Resolution 2018-027 was approved by the County Proposal relates to N/A -00007 Strategic Plan County Council on 8/8/2018 declaring support for the Agricultural and Implementation updated Whatcom County Agricultural Strategic Rural lands Plan. Immediate priorities in this plan include reviewing designation of Agricultural Lands of Long- term Commercial Significance and the agricultural zoning code. Reviewing the Rural Study Areas as listed in the 2007 Rural Land Study and making recommendations for possible changes in accordance with Resolution 2009-040 (100,000 acre target), Resolution 2018-027 (Updated Agricultural Strategic Plan) and RCW 36.70A.170 and .177 will be included. Other short-term and medium -term priorities in this plan include development of policies and regulations that provide for protection of the best agricultural areas while supporting development at zoned densities and continued work on development of the Natural Resource Marketplace. These activities may lead to proposed changes to the agricultural portions of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations. PLN2012 MRL Expansion Ferndale Amend the comprehensive plan designation from Parcel # N/A -00009 - North Star Ready Mix & Rural to Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) and amend 390110 212100; Rd. Gravel the zoning map to expand a MRL overlay zone on Within the SW 1/4 of approximately 19.7 acres on the west side of North section 10, T39N, Star Rd., south of Brown Rd. The underlying zoning R1E, W.M. is Rural one dwelling/five acres (R5A). Point Roberts Independent Business Council February 17, 2020 Planning & Development Services c/o Mark Personius 5280 Northwest Drive C Bellingham, WA 98226 (360) 778-5900 FEB 1 ' f ' On July 8, 2019 the Point Roberts Independent Business Council (PRIBC) submitted Zoning Amendment Application PLN2020-00001, inclusive of aDocketing Application Fee #8438, which included a request to waive the associated application fees, citing precedent set in 2014 by Whatcom County's having waived all associated fees for the Point Roberts Community Advisory Committee's own Zoning Amendment Application do revise Point Roberts Special District 20.72. We respectfully submit to Planning and Development Services the attached revised application, in order to provide additional information, which supports our amended description. The original application proposed the 'Full and complete repeal of Point Roberts Special District 20.72'. The revised application proposes 'An Immediate Moratorium of Point Roberts Special District 20.72, excepting for Sections 20.72.400 and 20.72.653, until such time as a Hearing Examiner Process is able to comprehensively assess the economic impacts and the overall efficacy of this Whatcom County Code which is in direct conflict with the existing Point Roberts Sub -Area Plan, which it purports to enforce.' As Whatcom County records clearly indicate, since the inception of Point Roberts Special District 20.72, no measurable economic impact studies have been undertaken by either the County or the Point Roberts Community Advisory, nor by any outside agency, to support the ongoing expansion and furtherance of 20.72. In November 2019, the PRIBC commissioned the Western Washington University's Center for Business and Economic Research to provide measurable economic data, which upon review, strongly supports our position that 20.72 not only provides no discernable economic benefit to the Small Town Commercial District of Point Roberts, it has and continues to negatively impact the economic viability of Point Roberts as a whole. The Port of Bellingham's Regional Economic Partnership is in support of the PRIBC's assertion that the failure to address these economic impacts likely presents a clear and present danger to the economic viability of the Point Roberts business community, and its stated purpose of supporting an environment of sustainable tourism. Respectfully, Brian Calder President, PRIBC Tel: (360) 945-2353 Email: agiatr obertsibo@mail.ctn Website: www.pribc.org WHATCOM COUNTY J.E. "Sam" Ryan Planning & Development Services �_ Director 5280 Northwest Drive Bellingham, WA 98226-9097 360-778-5900, TTY 800-833-6384 360-778-5901 Fax Application for Zoning Amendments Please check one of the following: Standard Map Amendment Site Specific Rezone Zoning Text Amendment Complete Sections A, 8, C, F Complete Sections A, 8, D, F Complete Sections A, E, F Do not write in this section of the application -for official use only. Date Received: Date Complete: Topic of Proposed Amendment: File : Initials of reviewer: Moratorium and Comprehensive Review of Point Roberts Special District 20.72, and the Point Roberts Design Guidelines. A. General Information — All applicants must complete this section. Applicant's Name: Point Roberts Independent Business Council Signature: Mailing Address: 1940 APA Road Point Roberts, WA 98281 Email Address: pointrobertsibc@gmail.com Home Phone #: 3609452353 Cell Phone #: 3603197958 Business Phone # 1 Agent's Name: Brian Calder Mailing Address: 1940 APA Road Point Roberts, WA 98281 Email Address: pointrobertsibc@gmail.com Business Phone #: (360) 945-2353 Cell Phone #: (360) 319-7958 Home Phone # Please complete the questions below. Attach additional pages as needed. 1. Give a complete but short description of the proposed amendment. An Immediate Moratorium of Point Roberts Special District 20.72, excepting for Sections 20.72.400 and 20.72.653, until such time as a Hearing Examiner Process is able to comprehensively assess the economic impacts and the overall efficacy of this Whatcom County Code which is in direct conflict with the existing Point Roberts Sub -Area Plan, which it purports to enforce. 2. Explain how the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and overall intent of the Comprehensive Plan by listing specific goals or policies and explaining how the proposal complies with each of them. Establishment of the Point Roberts Special District 20.72 failed entirely to address critical economic impacts on Point Roberts. There exists no measureability within 20.72 to determine whether it is either beneficial or detrimental to the economic well-being of the Point Roberts business community. Within the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan there is no specificity for how Whatcom County will periodically review the economic impacts of either the Point Roberts Sub -Area Plan or Ordinances passed by County Council which have cited the Sub - Area Plan as rationale for Zoning or Code implementation such as Point Roberts Special District 20.72. WCC Small Town Commercial 20.61 is sufficient to address these concerns and should be the only STC zoning considerations for Point Roberts, so as to provide parity with the entirety of Whatcom County. 3. Describe the "changed" condition(s) which support the amendment. In 2019 Whatcom County issued a 'temporary' moratorium on Point Roberts Special District 20.72, requesting that the Point Roberts Community Advisory Committee (established by Ordinance 2010-008) be tasked with proposing revisions to 20.72. The PRCAC's attempt to revise 20.72, failed entirely to address the detrimental economic impacts to local businesses which are presently at risk, for failure to comply with 20.72. The PRCAC's 'so-called 2019 review' of 20.72 blatantly refused to consider how 20.72, or the thirty year -old Point Roberts Sub -Area Plan have negatively impacted the economic viability of the community of Point Roberts. 2 B. Zoning Map Amendments (Standard Map Amendments and Site Specific Rezones) Property Interest of Applicant: Purchaser/Owner Lessee Other: Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: Existing Zoning District: Subarea: 1. What is the proposed zoning classification? Proposed Classification: Overlay 2. What is the present use of the property or properties within the proposed rezone? 3. Describe the land use of the surrounding properties. Land use of the surrounding properties is predominantly zoned Small Town Commercial. 3 C. Standard Map Amendments 1. Supporting information for standard map amendments. Attach the following items: a. A vicinity map showing property lines, roads, buildings and their use, easements, existing and proposed zoning, wells and other pertinent data. b. A list of all property owners and others having a legal interest in the property covered by the proposed change. c. A list of the names and mailing addresses of the owners of all property within 300 feet (exclusive of roads and alleys). A site plan may be requested at a future date if the intended amendment is to accommodate a particular development. The applicant may wish to submit a plan at the time of application. The site plan is a scaled drawing showing approximate location of buildings, roadways, parking, drainage facilities, sanitation and water facilities, and easements. Where appropriate, the location of landscaping, buffers, common areas, and typical individual lease spaces for mobile home and recreational vehicle parks shall be included in the site plan. D. Site Specific Rezones 1. Does the proposed amendment have a substantial relationship to public health, safety, morals, general welfare or community needs? No agency, department, organization, committee or individual has provided any economic impact studies since the establishment of 20.72, nor within subsequent amendments to support its furtherance, nor has Whatcom County provided any means of ongoing measurability of its economic benefit to the local economy. The proposed amendment does in fact have a substantial relationship to public health, safety, morals, general welfare and community needs. Point Roberts has never implemented an Economic Development Strategy, and by proxy, has no reasonable means by which to measure the efficacy of and economic impacts on the local economy. No Ordinance, Zoning overlay or proposed revisions of existing zoning, or enforcement of such, should be implemented without sufficient economic impact consideration. There is in fact a clear and present danger to the general welfare and community needs. 2. Will the proposed use be serviced adequately by essential public facilities such as highways, streets, public safety and fire protection, drainage structure, refuse disposal, water and sewers, and schools; or will the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use be able to adequately provide any such services? Describe. No additional essential Public Facilities would be required for either a moratorium of 20.72, nor would additional essential Public Facilities be required for a Comprehensive Review and Assessment by the Hearing Examiner Process. 3. Is the proposal is located within an Urban Growth Area? Yes No (go to question #14) a. Will the site be serviced by full urban services or be capable of receiving urban services in time to serve the development? Yes No b. Will the proposed site use preclude development at urban levels of density when the area is annexed into the city? Yes No c. Will the proposed site be five (5) or more acres in size? Yes No 4. Supporting information for site -specific map amendment. Attach the following items: a. A vicinity map showing property lines, roads, buildings and their use, easements, existing and proposed zoning, wells and other pertinent data. b. A conceptual site plan drawn at not less than one (1) inch to one -hundred (100), unless mutually agreed to by the proponent and administrative official, including, but not be limited to: 1. General location of structures. 2. Location and number of access points. 3. Approximate gross floor area of structures. 4. Name of the proposal. 5. Identification of areas requiring special treatment due to their sensitive nature. 6. North directional arrow. 7. Names and location of all public streets or roads bordering the site. 8. General legal description(s) for the site. c. Concurrent submittal of a Discretionary Development Permit or Building Permit, if required for the project. NOTE: If the project does not require a Discretionary Development Permit or Building Permit or will be constructed in phases, then a narrative statement must be submitted with the conceptual site plan that provides a detailed description of the project proposal and a project completion date. If the project will be constructed in phases provide start and completion dates for each phase and include a final completion date for the entire proposed project. d. A list of all property owners and others having a legal interest in the property covered by the proposed change. e. Evidence that all property owners within the proposed rezone boundary concur with the rezone and project proposal. 9 f. Mailing labels with names and mailing addresses of the owners of all property included within the area proposed for re -designation and: For a map amendment within an existing urban growth area, mailing labels with the. typed address of each property owner within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. For a map amendment outside existing urban growth areas, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 1,000 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. For map amendments that involve rezoning property to an Airport Operations District, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 1,500 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. g. A completed Environmental Checklist, E. Zoning Text Amendments Are there any other circumstances that justify the proposed change? Without a substantive Economic Development Strategy, any and all code and/or revisions to existing zoning overlays which contradict sound economic development policy, prevent and subvert andy and all efforts for the Point Roberts Community to provide economic benefit to its residents, property owners, taxpayers, and business community. The present global economic downturn, caused in large part by the World Health Organization's Covid-19 global health pandemic pronouncement, presents a clear and imminent threat to the economic viability of all tourism specific locations throughout the world. To further handicap Point Roberts in this regard, by failing to properly address the shortcomings and inadequacies of Point Roberts Special District 20.72, would be malfeasance of the highest order, would unnecessarily place both the near term and long term economic health and well-being of Point Roberts in jeopardy. Failure to provide access to the Whatcom County Hearing Examiner process, and by proxy the Planning Commission, for a Comprehensive Review of Point Roberts Special District 20.72, would place Whatcom County in jeopardy for costly litigation, which in turn would cause significant economic peril for both Whatcom County and Point Roberts. F. Authorization: Signature of Applicant(s) or Agent: Point Roberts Independent Business Council Date: Date: Date: February 17, 2020 L WHATCOM COUNTY Planning & Development Services 5280 Northwest Drive Bellingham, WA 98226-9097 360-778-5900,TTY 800-833-6384 360-778-5901 Fax tzy PDS@whatcomcounty.us Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Date Received: File #: Please check one or more of the following amendment types: ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map ✓❑ Comprehensive Plan Text ❑ Development Regulation Map ❑ Development Regulation Text Mark Personius, AICP Director This form should be used for proposed amendments to the following development regulations in the Whatcom County Code: • Title 16 - Environment, • Title 20 - Zoning, • Title 21 - Land Division Regulations, and • Title 23 - Shoreline Management Program. Topic of Proposed Amendment: Whatcom County Six -Year Capital Improvement Program (Appendix F of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan). Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 1 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 A. General Information — All applicants must complete this section. Applicant Name: Whatcom County Planning & Development Services Mailing Address: 5280 Northwest Dr. City Bellingham State WA Zip Code 98226 Phone # (360) 778-5900 Email Agent/Contact Name: Matt Aamot Mailing Address: Same City State Zip Code Phone # Email Please complete the questions below. Attach additional pages as needed B. For Map Amendments Parcel Information Tax Parcel Number(s) (APN) N/A Total Acreage - Gross N/A Site Address N/A Township: N/A Range: N/A Net: N/A Section: N/A 1/4 Section: N/A Owner Name N/A Mailing Address: City State Zip Code Phone # Email 1. Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: N/A 2. Existing Zoning Designation: N/A 3. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: N/A 4. Proposed Zoning Designation: N/A 5. The Present Use of the Property is: N/A Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 2 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 6. The Intended Future Use of the Property is: N/A 7. Surrounding Land Use: N/A 8. Services: Please provide the following information regarding the availability of services: The site is currently served by: ❑ Sewer ❑ Septic If sewer the purveyor is: N/A The site is currently served by: ❑ Public Water System ❑ Well If public water the purveyor is: N/A The site is located on a: ❑ Public Road ❑ Private Road Name of Road: N/A Fire District #: N/A Name: School District #: N/A Name: Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 3 of 8 P1-4-84-001-A February 2019 C. For Text Amendments: Identify the sections of the Comprehensive Plan and/or development regulation that you are proposing to change and provide the proposed wording. The proposal involves reviewing and updating the capital facilities element of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan, including the Six -Year Capital Improvement Program for Whatcom County Facilities (Appendix F of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan). The Six -Year Capital Improvement Program will be updated to reflect new conditions and County priorities. D. For All Amendments: 1. Why is the amendment needed and being proposed? Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Policy 4I3-1 is to: Maintain and update, on at least a biennial basis, a six -year capital improvement program (CIP) that identifies projects, outlines a schedule, and designates realistic funding sources for all county capital projects based on a review of population and revenue conditions existing at that time. The last update to the County's Six -Year Capital Improvement Program (Appendix F) was in 2018 under Ordinance # 2018-074. Therefore, it is due for an update in 2020. 2. How does the proposed amendment conform to the requirements of the Growth Management Act? The Growth Management Act (GMA), at RCW 36.70A.070(3), requires that the Comprehensive Plan capital facilities plan must include an inventory, forecast of future needs, expanded or new capital facilities, and six -year financing plan. The Whatcom County captial facilities element will be updated, as necessary to address these items, in 2020. 3. How is the proposed amendment consistent with the County -Wide Planning Policies for Whatcom County? County -Wide Planning Policy K-1 states: "As part of the comprehensive planning process, the county and the cities shall identify appropriate land for public facilities which meets the needs of the community..." The Whatcom County Six -Year Capital Improvement Program is updated periodically in order to conduct on -going planning for County facilities. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 4 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 4. How is the proposed amendment consistent with the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan? Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan GOAL 4B is to: "Develop a six -year financing program for capital facilities that meets the requirements of the GMA, achieves the county's levels -of -service, and is within financial capability as determined by projected financial resources." The subject proposal is intended to update the Capital Improvement Program to maintain compliance with the above referenced Comp Plan goal for County facilities. 5. If within an Urban Growth Area, how is the proposed amendment consistent with interlocal agreements between the County and the City? The proposed amendment would modify the text of the Comprehensive Plan. Some projects listed in the Comprehensive Plan are located within urban growth areas. However, no conflicts with interlocal agreements have been identified at this time. 6. What changed conditions or further studies indicate a need for the amendment? • With the passage of time, the inventory of existing County facilities should be updated to include any facility changes during the past two years. • County goals, policies and adopted level of service standards should be reviewed in order to evaluate County facilities needed through the end of the new six -year planning period, which is 2026. • New County priorities and/or changed conditions may necessitate altering the list of capital improvement projects and/or financing planned for the new six -year period from 2021-2026. 7. How will the public interest be served by the amendment? Please address the factors identified below. • The anticipated effect upon the rate or distribution of population growth, employment growth, development, and conversion of land as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. • The anticipated effect upon the ability of the County and/or other service providers, such as cities, schools, water and/or sewer purveyors, fire districts, and others as applicable, to provide adequate services and public facilities including transportation facilities. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 5 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 • Anticipated impact upon designated agricultural, forest and mineral resource lands. The goal of capital facility planning is to ensure parks, government buildings, correction facilities, roads, and other facilities will be adequate to serve the people of Whatcom County. The proposal includes adoption of a Six -Year Capital Improvement Program, which is a plan for providing County facilities over the six -year period from 2021 to 2026, based upon projected population growth. Therefore, the proposal should complement the County's growth and development plans. Adverse impacts to service providers have not been identified. Additionally, the proposed text amendments should not harm resource lands. 8. Does the amendment include or facilitate illegal spot zoning? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No Please explain. No zoning amendments are proposed. E. Supporting Information — Attach the Following: A. A vicinity map showing property lines, roads, existing and proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations. (This information is required for map amendments only). B. Mailing labels with names and mailing addresses of the owners of all property included within the area proposed for re -designation and: • For a map amendment within an existing urban growth area, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. • For a map amendment outside existing urban growth areas, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 1,000 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 6 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 • For map amendments that involve rezoning property to an Airport Operations District, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 1,500 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. • For map amendments that involve rezoning property to a Mineral Resource Land (MRL) designation, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 2,000 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. C. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist D. For Comprehensive Plan map amendments that propose to re -designate property to a MRL designation, a Comprehensive Plan MRL Application Supplement form is required. F. Fees Applicants pay a docketing fee when submitting an application and additional amendment application fees if the County Council decides to docket the application. The Whatcom County Code 22.10.020(3)(b) states that, when docketing an application, the county council may waive the application fees if it finds the proposed amendment would clearly benefit the community as a whole. A. Are you requesting that the County Council waive the application fees? ❑ Yes ❑ No If so, please describe how the proposed amendment clearly benefits the community as a whole. Fees are not required pursuant to WCC 22.10.020. NOTE: Fees will be assessed in accordance with the Whatcom County Unified Fee Schedule (UFS) in effect at the time of application submittal. Please contact Planning and Development Services to determine project specific fees. Click here to see the 2019/2020 UFS. Per UFS 2843 all permits and applications are subject to a Technology fee. The fee is calculated on the permit/application fees due. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 7 of 8 P1-4-84-001-A February 2019 E. Authorization Signature of Applicant(s) or Agent: Date: Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 8 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 WHATCOM COUNTY Planning & Development Services 5280 Northwest Drive Bellingham, WA 98226-9097 360-778-5900, TTY 800-833-6384 360-778-5901 Fax PDS@whatcomcounty.us Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Date Received: \7--t231 2-a1f) File #: _ Please check one or more of the following amendment types: ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text Z Development Regulation Map ❑ Development Regulation Text Mark Personius, AICP Director PLAN 61PJ6 & lJ1-AL0i - i ,,iT SERVICL-S DEC 2 3 2019 REr°lVrD This form should be used for proposed amendments to the following development regulations in the Whatcom County Code: • Title 16 - Environment, • Title 20 - Zoning, • Title 21 - Land Division Regulations, and • Title 23 - Shoreline Management Program. Topic of Proposed Amendment: Changing lots that have residential homes on it and a vacant lot that is situated between residential homes from Neighborhood commercial to resident al zoning. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 1 of 8 PL4-84-001-A November 2018 A. General Information — All applicants must complete this section. Applicant Name CHARLES P. VOGEL & George Johnson Mailing Address: 478 E. WISER LAKE RD State WA Zip Code 98264 Email CPV490@COMCAST. NET City LYNDEN Phone # (360-Y20-0425 Agent/Contact Name! CHARLES P. VOGEL Mailing Address: 478 E WISER LAKE RD State WA _Zip Code 98264 Email CPV490eCOMCAST.NET Phone # �60 City LYNDEN 0-0425 Please co rnp Iete the q uestions below. Attach additional a ges as needed B. For Map Amendments Parcel Information Tax Parcel Number(s) (APN) 380127-4560160000 3801274570230000 3801274550090000 Total Acreage - Gross 1.25 ACRES OR (54450 sq ft.) _ Net: 1.25 acres _ Site Address 3384 Northgate Rd., XXXX Northgate Rd. , 3376 Northgate Rd. Bellin ham,Wa Township: 38 Range: _1-E Section: 27 1/4 Section: Owner Name Charles & Yolanda Vogel, George & Marion Johnson, Gary & Nancy Lee Mailing Address: 478 E. Wiser Lake Rd. State Wa Zip Code 98264 Email. cpv490@comcast.net City Lynden Phone # �60-)?20-0425 1. Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural neighborhood 2. Existing Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial 3. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural Neighborhood 4. Proposed Zoning Designation: Rural Residential RR-1 5. The Present Use of the Property is: 2 single family residences and 1 vacant lot which is situated between the 2 homes. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 2 of 8 PL4-84-001-A November 2018 6. The Intended Future Use of the Property is: Single family residences which was the use prior to the County rezoning the properties in 1999. 7. Surrounding Land Use: Directly North of the Property and abutting it there are single family residences. West of the Properties across the street there are single family residences. South of the properties are also single family residences. East of the properties is vacant land. 8. Services: Please provide the following information regarding the availability of services: The site is currently served by: W1 Sewer ❑ Septic If sewer the purveyor is: Lummi Tribla Water & Sewer District The site is currently served by: ❑ Public Water System Z Well If public water the purveyor is: Community Well Leeward/North ate Water Associatil The site is located on a: ❑✓ Public Road ❑ Private Road Name of Road: Northgate road Fire District #: 8 Name: Marietta Gooseberry Point School District #: 502 Name: Ferndale School District 9. Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs): Are TDRs required under section 20.89.050 of the Whatcom County Code? ❑ Yes j✓j No If so, please explain how your proposal complies with the TDR requirements and/or how you qualify for modification/exceptions from the TDR requirements Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 3 of 8 PL4-84-001-A November 2018 C. For Text Amendments: Identify the sections of the Comprehensive Plan and/or development regulation that you are proposing to change and provide the proposed wording. N/A D. For All Amendments: 1. Why is the amendment needed and being proposed? All the lots surrounding these 3 lots are very nice homes and are are used as residential. These lots protrude into the residential neighborhood. Being the neighborhood is surrounded by upper priced homes none of the neighbors are interesed in seeing these properties used a commercial because it would be at there front door step or back yard. Of the 3 properties we are proposing to be rezoned residential 2 are already being used as residential with existing homes. One property is vacant. If it was not rezoned the owner would be left with only being able to build a restaurant, gas station or some other type of commercial establishment which all the residents would oppose. It would be opposed because it does not fit the character of the neighborhood which is residential. The amendment is to undo a error in a rezone that happened in 1999 that changed homes that were built and zoned and used as residences to commercial. 2. How does the proposed amendment conform to the requirements of the Growth Management Act? The Comprehensive plan design is for Rural Community. This plan allows for more denser developement of residential in the area. 3. How is the proposed amendment consistent with the County -Wide Planning Policies for Whatcom County? It is consistent under the policy in Appendix (C) B-3 "Whatcom County shall promote appropriate land uses and allow for infill within rural settlements " Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 4 of 8 PL4-84-001-A November 2018 4. How is the proposed amendment consistent with the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan? It is consistent with the Comprehensive plan under Land Use Chapter 2 Policy 2-GG-1 and Policy Goal 2-13-1 and Policy 2 JJ-5. 5. If within an Urban Growth Area, how is the proposed amendment consistent with interlocal agreements between the County and the City? N/A 6. What changed conditions or further studies indicate a need for the amendment? Illegal Spot Zoning 20.97.186 7. How will the public interest be served by the amendment? Please address the factors identified below. The anticipated effect upon the rate or distribution of population growth, employment growth, development, and conversion of land as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. The anticipated effect upon the ability of the County and/or other service providers, such as cities, schools, water and/or sewer purveyors, fire districts, and others as applicable, to provide adequate services and public facilities including transportation facilities. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 5 of 8 P1-4-84-001-A November 2018 • Anticipated impact upon designated agricultural, forest and mineral resource lands. There should be literally No effect on population growth or employment growth or development as envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. The main reason is 2 of the 3 properties being changed to residential are already being used as residential. The 3rd property which is a vacant lot is already served by Lummi Tribal water and sewer and is being billed in accordance to use. The effect on the ability of the County to serve the properties being rezoned is again essential nil or zero. As 2 properties are already residences hooked up to water and sewer and the 3 is already hooked up to water and pays a monthly sewer fee. So only effect would be to schools if in the future the residence would have children living there. Yet this effect would be minimal as the assessment of the property would be higher and generate more tax dollars for the school. There is no anticipated effect on forest or agricultural lands. 8. Does the amendment include or facilitate illegal spot zoning? ❑ Yes Jtl No Please explain. The Properties were previously used as residences prior to Whatcom County rezoning them to neighborhood commercial. In addition the properties were part of an existing neighborhood that was residential. It is not just one spot or area apart from the current residential use that surrounds these properties. E. Supporting Information — Attach the Following: A. A vicinity map showing property lines, roads, existing and proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations. (This information is required for map amendments only). B. Mailing labels with names and mailing addresses of the owners of all property included within the area proposed for re -designation and: For a map amendment within an existing urban growth area, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. For a map amendment outside existing urban growth areas, mailing Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 6 of 8 PL4-84-001-A November 2018 labels with the typed address of each property owner within 1,000 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. For map amendments that involve rezoning property to an Airport Operations District, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 1,500 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. ■ For map amendments that involve rezoning property to a Mineral Resource Land (MRL) designation, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 2,000 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. C. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist D. For Comprehensive Plan map amendments that propose to re -designate property to a MRL designation, a Comprehensive Plan MRL Application Supplement form is required. F. Fees Applicants pay a docketing fee when submitting an application and additional amendment application fees if the County Council decides to docket the application. The Whatcom County Code 22.10.020(3)(b) states that, when docketing an application, the county council may waive the application fees if it finds the proposed amendment would clearly benefit the community as a whole. A. Are you requesting that the County Council waive the application fees? Wi Yes ❑ No If so, please describe how the proposed amendment clearly benefits the community as a whole. The amendment eliminates commercial development pocket inside of a residential neighborhood. So keeping the neighborhood residential as it is currently used. It also supports what the neighbors believe to be the best use of the properties being rezoned. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 7 of 8 P1-4-84-001-A November 2018 E. Authorization: Signature of Appiii a s) OyAgent: ate: / 2/191iy ❑ate: � & 2 ZZ Date: Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 8 of 8 PL4-84-001-A November 2018 Y 131 • `�e Q �'QT 3. x 504- i�q �o li• 7 � TOWNSHI P s RANGE IE SECTION 27 MAP NO. Od SCALE DATE 9 93/64 MAR 0 3 2011 -W. YrY��u R.17•R Yo25 0� o.41•A 1. yOZS rpr,a+ �E o . ' i _ o.41•h J..' I ILu w f!T ®Y m L x493 y eouner Q ��� ari•+ fir' R1L� ,� pLp`T f Y O,_ X 521i" X 555 fst iwr rru, wr+r{Q3 X i55 yl aaen� aas n �1013i013wtwrs >t HBI!� tws� o.ra•A b. yoo �rF.rsrva/ 2,92'A 1.22-A `'--------- --� Z -0 tit [ 0 a 1Nhatcom Land Title This map/plat is being furnished as an aid in locating the herein described land in relation to adjoining streets, natural boundaries and other land, and is not a survey of the land depicted. Except to the extent a policy of title 2011 Young Street Bellingham, WA 9B225 insurance is expressly modified by endorsement, if any, the company does not insure dimensions, distances, Ph: (360) 676�8484 Tall Free: (800) 334.6314 location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon. 12/19/2019 To whom it may concern, We are neighbors to the properties Northgate rd that Charles Vogel is applying to rezone. We were very surprised to learn it was commercial. It would be very upsetting if the properties were used as commercial being they are in a very quiet neighborhood. We definitely would not like a commercial business across the street from our front doors. Please give consideration and allow the 3 properties to be rezoned to residential as that is what fits the character of our neighborhood. Sincerely Printed name 12/19/2019 To whom it may concern, We are neighbors to the properties Northgate rd that Charles Vogel is applying to rezone. We were very surprised to learn it was commercial. It would be very upsetting if the properties were used as commercial being they are in a very quiet neighborhood. We definitely would not like a commercial business across the street from our front doors. Please give consideration and allow the 3 properties to be rezoned to residential as that is what fits the character of our neighborhood. Sincerely J �� 1 Printed name h!Oil Jim�s 11?3,0' 1 PPWa f-4f 4✓&C/ ellr, a � � WW 2 z max/ ,--A4 ok�S7- WHATCOM COUNTY Planning & Development Services 5280 Northwest Rd., Suite B Bellingham, WA 98226 360-778-5900 CUSTOMER RECEIPT Receipt: 5201000000000025994 Payor: C&Y INVESTMENTS WA LLC Date: 12/23/2019 Description Amount PLN2020-00003 Docketing App. Fee #8438 405.00 3% Tech Fee #2843 12.15 Total: $ 417.15 Check # 8523 Paid $ 417.15 C&Y INVESTMENTS WA LLC Thank you! uNa¢ai 4.10. i 7 WHATCOM COUNTY Planning & Development Services 5280 Northwest Drive Bellingham, WA 98226-9097 360-778-5900, TTY 800-833-6384 360-778-5901 Fax Purpose of Checklist: Mark Personius, AICP 9P1% Director A&A&Aj SEP SEPA Environmental Checklist Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions For Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not ap-p_y" only when you can explain why it does not apply_ and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Non -Project Proposals. For non -project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the Supplemental Sheet for Non -project Actions (Part Q. Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proponent" and "affected geographic area", respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. PUANNIN ix bi vL! 0HMEN•1 SCPCVICES DEC 2 3 2019 RECEIVED Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 1 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant A Background 1 Name of proposed project, if applicable: Northgate Residential Rezone of 2 family homes and one vacant lot. 2 Name of applicant: CHARLES VOGEL Applicant phone number: 360-220-0425 Applicant address: 478E WISER LAKE RD City, State, Zip or Postal Code: LYNDEN, WA. 98264 Applicant Email address: CPV490@COMCAST.NET 3 Contact name: CHARLES VOGEL Contact phone number: 360-220-0425 Contact address: 478 E WISER LAKE RD City, State, Zip or Postal Code: LYNDEN, WA. 98264 Contact Email address: CPV490@COMCAST.NET 4 Date checklist prepared: CHARLES VOGEL 5 Agency requesting checklist: WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. 6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): REZONE IN 2020 Evaluation For Agency Use Only 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes Z No If yes, explain: Aquiring a single family home building permit for vacant lot. No changes to existing homes 8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: No evironmental information applicable, 2 homes already exist were permited and built 1990's and vacant lot was cleared 30-40 years ago and is just lawn. 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Yes n No [� If yes, explain. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only 10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Approval of Whatcom County to amend zoning map from Neighborhood Commercial to Residential. 11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this age. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Rezone 3 properties consisting of 2 family homes and a vacant lot siutated in the middle of Residential zoning. Change the zoning from Neighborhood Commerical to residential RR-1. The rezone will be a total of 1.25 acres. 12 Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address of properties are 3384 Northgate Rd. and 3376 Northgate rd. Bellingham, Wa. and XXXX Northgate rd the vacant lot siutated between 3384 Northgate rd and 3376 Northgate rd. Parcel#s 3801274560160000, 380127457023000,3802744550090000 See Attached plat map. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 3 of 20 Form P1-4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant B Environmental Elements 1 Earth a. General description of the site: ✓ Flat Rolling Hilly Steep Slopes Mountainous ❑ Other Evaluation For Agency Use Only b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% slope overall for about 200 ft then where the county road was cut in on west side the slope is about 45% for about 25 ft. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Sandy loam soils currently covered by lawn and residences. There were be not longer significance as use will be the same except one additional residence will be built in the future. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? Yes ❑ No u If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling excavation or grading proposed. No immediate excavation but when home is built in the future excavation would be rought an area of about 2000 sqt ft. Indicate source of fill. NO FILL WILL BE NEEDED. Indicate were excavation material is going. Excavation material will be leveled and left on site. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 4 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Yes [I No n If so, generally describe. There is vegetation that surrounds area and seeded grass. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Currently no change but in the future impervious surface would be roughly 3000 sq ft which would consist of new family residence and driveway. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fence and hay berms 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation and maintenance when the project is completed (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, or industrial wood smoke)? NO EMISSIONS. If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? Yes ❑ No Z If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant 3. Water a. Surface: Evaluation For Agency Use Only (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? Yes ❑ No U If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. (2) Will the project require any work over in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Yes [� No P/1 If yes, please describe and attach available plans. (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A (4) Will the proposal re nI/u ire surface water withdrawals or diversions? Yes ❑ No Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? Yes ❑ No ,f❑ If so, note location on the site plan. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 6 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only (5) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? Yes ❑ No ✓❑ If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge b. Ground Water: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? Yes ❑✓❑ No ❑ If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. There is an existing well that serves the 3 lots that are being rezoned and 3 other single family residences. The system is called the LEEWARD/ NORTHGATE WATER ASSOCIATION. (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals.....; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water runoff (including stormwater): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 7 of 20 Form 131-4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, describe. (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, generally describe. (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site: Yes ❑ No n If so, describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4 Plants a. Check types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑✓ Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs I✓� Grass ❑ Pasture ❑ Crop or grain ❑ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops ❑ Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other El Other types of vegetation Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NO VEGETATION WILL BE REMOVED. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NO ENDANGERED SPECIES. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NONE NEEDED. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN 5. Animals a. Check any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, U Heron, Eagle, ❑ Songbirds; l� Other: Mammals: -� Deer, Bear, AElk, Beaver; Other: Fish: ❑� Bass, ❑ Salmon, Trout, ❑ Herring, Shellfish; Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 9 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only c. Is the site part of a migration route? Yes No J] If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE NEEDED e. List any invasive species known to be on or near site. NONE OBERSERVED 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and propane. b. Would your project affect the pq ential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? Yes ❑ No JJ If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Being just a rezone no immediate features are included 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? Yes ❑ No Q If so, describe. (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. N/A NONE Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. NONE (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the projects development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. NONE (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE REQUIRED (5) Proposed measure to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NOT NEEDED b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None right now but in the future when new residence is built 1 week of machinery noice will foundation is dug from 9-5pm (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None right now but in the future Work during normal business hours Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 11 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed Evaluation For By Applicant Agency Use Only 8 Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Single family Residences Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? Yes ❑ No F✓ If so, describe. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? Yes ❑ No E,(:J If so, describe. How much agriculture or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? NONE If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to non -farm or non -forest use? (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling and harvesting? Yes [:] No [✓� If so, how: c. Describe any structures on the site. Currently 2 single family homes and 1 vacant lot. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 12 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes ❑ No n e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Neighborhood Commerical Evaluation For Agency Use Only f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Rural Neighborhood g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? Yes ❑ No I✓] If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Rezone the 3 properties so the are zoned the same use as all the properties to the North and south and west which is residential m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any? N/A Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 13 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant 9 Housing Evaluation For Agency Use Only a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ❑I High Number of Units 1 l✓j Middle I_I Low-income b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ❑ High Number of Units N/A Middle Low-income c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10 Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Currently none proposed. But in the future would not exceed county regulations. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11 Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 14 of 20 Form PL4-83-OOSA January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12 Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13 Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state or local preservation registers located on or near the site? Yes ❑ No J❑ If so, specifically describe. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian, historic use or occupation, this may include human burials or old cemeteries? Yes❑No0 Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Yes ❑ No❑ Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 15 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples: Include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. N/A d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. N/A 14 Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plan, if any. Northgate rd. and Leeward Way. See attached plat map. b. Is site or geogra hic area currently served by public transit? Yes ❑ No ✓M If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? n/a d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? Yes ❑ No Q If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 16 of 20 Form P1-4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) ❑ Water, Rail, or Air transportation? If so, generally describe. n/a Evaluation For Agency Use Only f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? No new trips immediately but in the future after new residence is built 2-4 trips a day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None needed Transportation impact will be negligible. 15 Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? Yes EI No ❑✓ If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. n/a 16 Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ✓❑ Electricity, [_� Natural gas, 0 water, Refuse service, ✓ Telephone, H_/ Sanitary sewer, e Septic system, Other Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 17 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No new utilities proposed. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relyin �o them to make its decision. Signature: � � -- Date Submitted: / &m /I q FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Reviewed by Whatcom County Planning & Development Services Staff Staff Signature SEPA Environmental Checklist Form P1-4-83-005A Date Reviewed by initials Page 18 of 20 January 2019 To Be Completed Evaluation For By Applicant Agency Use Only C Supplemental Sheet for Non -project Actions (It is not necessary to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1 How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not likely Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None Needed 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No new affect to any of the above. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None needed. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Will not deplete energy or natural resources Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NONE NEEDED Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 19 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Will not affect any of the above. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Will not affect any of the above. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: n/a 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Unlikely that an increase in demands on any of the above mentioned Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: n/a 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not conflict with any local, State, or Federal laws. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 20 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 x ng3 0,�•x�l9i °51 yap r�0TA i�� ( a7 �•�� �ia'g R�q4 141 o� � 1444 � 3d • 4� G xG37 *e� �il�� � szl�ti / ;tom, fir''' po..�•e x d yvx5 y x+io � ��$-A _`y�A� V-91 h All 0.11" V.SS- ol O yooi - 0.I3-4 yGn4 0.4aM x OFBI 9.5>t-► R/!�lgYtY �.___—__-..----------� TOWNSHIP RANGE IE SECTION 27 MAP NO. Od y SCALL X o7 f0 DAT9 ti a183 64 t x° MAR 0 3 2011 G.?,6--A • obi a.� ra= ■J�IIrMfLf IY x 555 ceuriar ■�ff 1013 2.92•A i oi3 1.22-A FM Ati:tjmlff rrWcn.rrr. _. Nooksack Falls Site Specific Rezone Application FEQ 2 a `U U Narrative Supplement The Nooksack Falls Site Specific Rezone Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application is for the removal of the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave properties (3 tax parcels) from their current Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) Comprehensive Plan designation (retain underlying Rural Forestry zoning designation) and the addition of language to WCC 20.42.155 (RF conditional uses) to include the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave. This Narrative Supplement is intended to provide additional background on the history and existing uses of the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave Properties, and to identify the proposal's consistency with the County Comprehensive Plan. This information supports the assertion that the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave should be removed from the MRL Comprehensive Plan designation as proposed in the rezone request. Introduction The Nooksack Falls Area Exclave is in eastern Whatcom County on the south side of Mount Baker Highway. It is approximately 12 miles from Mount Baker Ski Area and approximately eight miles west of the town of Glacier if travelling along Mount Baker Highway ("the Property"). The Property is located east of the Foothills Subarea but shares many characteristics of the Subarea. The Property includes Nooksack Falls, which is an 88'-tall waterfall at the confluence of the North Fork of the Nooksack River and Wells Creek. Nooksack Falls is a well-known local tourist attraction, generating interest from recreational tourists taking advantage of the Mt Baker Ski Area and Mt Baker National Forest. These recreational areas are major local tourist attractions, drawing visitors from around Whatcom County and the greater Puget Sound region, and supporting many communities along the Mount Baker Highway. Historically, mining and hydroelectric power were the primary uses of the Property and surrounding area, as early as the 1900's. Mining activities in this area ceased over 50 years ago and there is no active mining on or near the Property. The hydroelectric power facility has been in operation for over 100 years, continues to provide power to Whatcom County residents along the Mt Baker Highway, and is on the National Register of Historic Places. Today, aside from power generation, the Property's primary and best use is for recreation and tourism. Tens of thousands of visitors travel to the Falls throughout each year to hike, picnic, view the Falls and engage in other outdoor recreation activities. History of the Falls Hydroelectric Power At the base of the Falls, on the Property, is the Nooksack Falls Hydroelectric Plant. Constructed in 1906, the plant "is the second oldest operating hydroelectric facility in western Washington". Construction of the plant was started by the Bellingham Bay Improvement Company in 1903 and completed by Stone & Webster in 1906. Completion of the plant provided a more trustworthy power source for nearby railways and 149 Bellingham residents.' In 1988, the plant was placed on the National Register of Historic Places.z Today, Puget Sound Hydro LLC owns the plant and provides power to residents as far as Kendall through a contract with PSE. The plant plays an important role in providing renewable power resources to Whatcom County residents in eastern Whatcom County. In addition to its function as an operating power generation facility "the building and machinery remain virtually unchanged since 1910",3 and are historically significant, and therefore add historic and cultural value to the Property and to Whatcom County. Puget Sound Hydro LLC is constantly looking to innovate and explore unique ways to utilize the power generated at the facility on -site. Improvements to the Falls recreation/tourism area could benefit from power provided by the on -site facilities. Mining Mining has occurred in the Mount Baker area for over 100 years, peaking in the early 1900's. Lead, zinc, and silver were discovered near Goat Mountain by H.C. Wells in 1896. The following year, Jack Post discovered a significant amount of gold on Bear Mountain. Post's discovery drew many miners to the Mount Baker area- specifically the Nooksack Mining District- by 1900. Several minerals have been discovered near Nooksack Falls including gold, silver, diamonds and copper. The most significant mine near the falls was the Great Excelsior Mine, which was established by the Great Excelsior Mining Company. The mining company constructed a 20-stamp mill on the property, which operated for a little over a decade. By 1916, the mill's costs exceeded its returns and it was shut down. In the latter half of the 20th century, mining interests near the Falls subsided, and there has been no active mining occurring at or around the Falls in over 50 years. Today, mining is no longer feasible within the Nooksack Falls Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) Exclave due to economic, environmental, topographic and other factors.4 'Kenneth D. Rose, "Nooksack Falls Hydroelectric Plant", no. WA-18 (1987), pp. 1-10 'Upper Nooksack River Recreation Plan Advisory Committee (UNRRPAC), "Upper Nooksack River Recreation Plan" (2015), pp. 29. 3 Neal A. Vogel, "Nooksack Falls Hydroelectric Plant, Glacier Vicinity, Washington 1906/10" (1987). 4 Wayne Moen, "Mines and Mineral Deposits of Whatcom County, Washington" (1969), pp. 10, 86. 2 Recreation and Tourism Over the latter half of the 20th century, Nooksack Falls attracted an increasing number of recreational visitors. The Property's proximity to popular recreational areas such as Artist Point, Mt. Baker Ski Area, and Picture Lake have contributed to the rise in recreational interest in the area and specifically at this site. Wells Creek Road serving the Falls is a US Forest Service Road that extends east past the Falls towards Mt. Baker. This road provides access to extensive hiking trails in the area and access to several prominent waterfalls along Wells Creek. The Excelsior Group camp site, providing campground and base camp facilities for hikers heading up the Excelsior Mountain trail, is located adjacent to the power generation facility portion of the Property, sharing an access road. To accommodate the growing interest in recreational activity in the area, primitive hiking trails, picnic tables, and a small gravel parking lot have been installed at the Falls viewing area along Wells Creek Road. By 1994 it was estimated that the falls received as many as 40,000 annual visitors, making it one of the most popular attractions in the Nooksack Falls Natural Resource watershed.5 Today, Nooksack Falls sees 50,000 + annual visitors who enjoy the trails, falls, and river views. The Falls are a unique and important natural area in Whatcom County and are recognized for their recreational and tourism value by Whatcom County residents, many local non-profit organizations, and visitors from out of County. The entire Mt Baker Recreation Area and associated National Park and Forest represent a significant recreation tourism draw for Whatcom County, supporting many eastern Whatcom County communities, creating jobs, and highlighting our County's natural beauty. The benefits of tourism in this area stretch throughout the County, supporting many businesses in Bellingham and other western Whatcom County communities. The Nooksack Falls Exclave Area is a unique and important component of our County's recreation/tourism character economy. Comprehensive Plan Discussion The proposed rezone is in response to changing conditions in the area over time including the abandonment of mining in the area and the emergence of strong interest in the Falls as a recreational and tourist draw. The proposal is broadly consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the rezone criteria identified in County Code. The proposal is supported by many Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies from various chapters. The MRL designation is longer appropriate in this area. As noted, mining is not economically viable at this location for various reasons related to topography and environmental restrictions associated with the Nooksack River. Chapter 8 of the Comprehensive Plan, Resource Lands, identifies various Goals and Polices related to Mineral Resource Lands. The Purpose of the section is identified as guiding "Whatcom s Cada, G., Dean, T., Hammitt, W. Kroodsma, R., McLean, R., Sale, M. J.... Webb, W., "Nooksack River Basin Hydroelectric Projects, Whatcom County: Environmental Impact Statement" (1997), pp. 4-23. County in conservation of mineral resource lands of long-term commercial significance". The Nooksack Falls Area Exclave does not have significant mineral resources of long-term commercial significance. The Chapter acknowledges changed circumstances "Mining activities in Whatcom County have taken place since the 1850s, though the nature, scope and extent of such activities has changed considerably through time" As noted, mining in this area would undoubtedly lead to impacts to the environment due to proximity to the Nooksack River, and is not economically viable, with long transport times, difficult access, and potential land use conflicts with the established recreation uses and power generation uses at the Falls. Several relevant Goals and Policies include: "Policy 8L-3: Avoid adversely impacting ground and surface water quality." "Goal 8S: Ensure that mining avoids adverse impacts to the habitat of threatened and endangered fish and wildlife species." "Policy SS-1: Ensure that adequate riparian buffers are maintained along rivers and streams." "Goal 8R: Designate Mineral Resource Lands (MRLs) containing commercially significant deposits throughout the county in proximity to markets in order to minimize construction aggregate shortages, higher transport costs, future land use conflicts and environmental degradation. Balance MRL designations with other competing land uses and resources." "Policy 8R-6: Consider removal of land from Mineral Resource Designation after mining and subsequent reclamation is completed." MRL Designation Criteria under the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan includes criterion number 11: "11. MRL Designations must be reviewed for internal consistency with other parts of the comprehensive plan so that the MRL designation does not preclude achievement of other parts of the comprehensive plan" "14. Must demonstrate higher value as mineral resource than forestry resource based upon: • soil conditions. • quality of mineral resource. • sustainable productivity of forest resource." 6 In this particular case the Falls Property has not been utilized for mining purposes for many decades and there is zero likelihood that additional mining operations would occur at the site; it would be appropriate to shift the focus of this area to the continued use of the site for power generation, recreational activity and tourism. These uses are consistent with various other Chapters in the Comprehensive Plan. 6 Whatcom County Planning and Development Service, "Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan" (2018), Chapter 8. 4 In Chapter 2, Land Use, the Rural Lands section discusses properties in the rural portions of Whatcom County. The Plan echoes the findings of the legislature, including the following vision statements: ■ Encourage the economic prosperity of rural residents • Foster opportunities forsmall-scale, rural -based employment and self-employment, • Permit the operation of rural -based agriculture, commercial, recreational, and • tourist businesses that are consistent with existing and planned land use patterns, • Be compatible with the use of the land by wildlife and for fish and wildlife habitat, ■ Foster the private stewardship of the land and preservation of open space, The Chapter also includes various Goals and Policies that support the proposed recreational and tourist use of the Property: "Policy 2DD-4: Conserve open space, park land, and trails for recreational use, as well as to protect essential habitat such as riparian areas and wetlands." "Policy 2DD-9: Promote economic prosperity for rural areas and allow rural property owners reasonable use of their land by continuing to allow legal nonconforming uses." "Goal 2FF.• Provide employment opportunities in the rural parts of Whatcom County." "Policy2FF-1: Support small businesses, cottage industries, home occupations, resource - based, tourist, recreational, and other appropriate industries in the rural areas of Whatcom County." "Goal: 2PP: Continue to recognize private parcels surrounded by National Park or National Forest as part of Whatcom County's jurisdiction." "Goal2QQ: Conserve or enhance important natural, cultural, and scenic resources." "Policy 2RR-4: Promote conservation principles by example or by offering educational opportunities." "Policy 2RR-6: Enhance recreation opportunities." "Policy 2RR-7. Preserve scenic vistas, historic, and archaeological sites." "Goal 2UU. Ensure equity between the public benefit and the private burden while encouraging open space retention." "Policy 2UU-5: Augment land use regulations by engaging in a proactive program of public investment, landowner incentives, and other actions aimed at preserving open space." "Policy 2UU-11: Support the important role of public and private conservation organizations." 7 7 Whatcom County Planning and Development Service, "Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan" (2018), Chapter 2. Economic activity in eastern Whatcom County is centered on recreational activities and tourism, and the small communities in this area depend on the winter and summer visitors who frequent the area. The power generation facilities at the Falls are family owned and operated and the operators live on -site. Public access to the Falls is provided by the owners at no cost, and there is no revenue generation from the Falls activity at this time. The ability to improve the facilities and offer cafe or other similar services would support the operation of the power facility and promote tourism in the area, as well as maintain the continued free public access to the Falls. The Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7, Economics, includes many Goals and Policies that support economic development, small businesses, rural and recreational based businesses and other things relevant to the proposed rezone: Policy 7A-4: In addition to stimulating family -wage employment and jobs in diverse sectors, ensure we retain entry level and service -related jobs such as those necessary to support tourism, recreation, retailing, and other industries. Policy 7A-8: Enhance the environment for resource -based and knowledge -based industries with an emphasis on attracting employment to the communities in eastern Whatcom County. Policy 7A-9: Produce a strategic plan to guide the county's participation in tourism marketing. Goal 7B: Support increased public/private sector partnering among all entities involved with economic development. Policy 7C-3: Work with service providers for a dependable electric power supply, alternative energy sources, communications, and evolving technology to support existing and future business development. Policy 7C-9: Work with Bellingham Whatcom County Tourism, and the cities to develop and implement a common Countywide Way -Finding system that encourages people traveling on the I-5 corridor to detour and easily find the many tourist attractions that Whatcom County has to offer. Goal 7E: Enhance the economic trade, tourism, and industrial siting advantages of the county's location adjacent to the Canadian border. Policy 7E-1: Support attractions for Canadians and other visitors so they will remain in the county longer and distribute their spending throughout the community. Some of the examples would include supportfor such items as the following: • Events such as the "Ski to Sea "race and festival. • Parks and open spaces. • The Mount Baker outdoor recreation area. • Farmers markets and other natural resource -based activities. • Projects, events and activities of unincorporated areas such as Point Roberts, Birch Bay and East County. Goal 7F. Encourage development that creates local reinvestment funds and provides jobs in the local community. Policy 717-1: Support existing businesses locally as the major contributors of job creation and regeneration and afford them every opportunity to continue their success in the community. Goal 7G: Coordinate economic development with environmental, resources, and other comprehensive plan land use and open space policies and measures to enhance the community's overall quality of life. Policy 7G-1: Recognize the natural environment as a major asset and manage environmental resources accordingly. We need both economic prosperity and environmental sustainability. Policy 7G-3: Provide support to Whatcom County's tourist industry to maintain and enhance a balance between the economic benefits of tourism and the local quality of life. Policy 7H-7. Encourage growth of tourism, recreational activities, and businesses that provide for diversity of the natural resource industry, provided they comply with County regulations and, when located in a rural area, preserve the rural character. Policy 7K-1: Support small and cottage businesses in rural areas that minimally impact productive agricultural, forest, or mineral resource land. Policy 7K-4: Encourage resource and tourism based recreational, commercial, and cottage industry uses to create economic opportunity in the rural areas of the county. 8 Recreation activities are clearly a major component of the County's character and contribute to the Countywide economy. The Comprehensive Plan, Recreation Chapter 9, states that "recreation is a vital component to the rich quality of life enjoyed by many Whatcom County residents and visitors". Among the County's goals and policies concerning recreation, Goal 91) of the Comprehensive Plan states: "Provide specialized recreation areas taking advantage of unique opportunities to serve both the county residents and visitors". The Nooksack Falls Area Exclave offers unique recreational opportunities including hiking trails, beautiful scenery, historic and cultural value. The Upper Nooksack River Recreation Plan (UNRRP) recognizes Nooksack Falls as "one of the most popular waterfalls in the North Cascades" (UNRAC, 2015, p. 25) and identifies Nooksack Falls as a "tourist destination with a scenic viewpoint" (UNRAC, 2015, app. A, p. 3). The Nooksack Falls Hydroelectric Plant is considered a cultural and historic value in the UNRRP (UNRAC 2015, app. A, p. 7). Along with the Falls and hydroelectric plant, there are a few other unique recreational and tourist opportunities near the Falls. Wells Creek Road is accessible by the road to Nooksack Falls and provides access to a kayak take-out location for the Class V Misto Canyon whitewater boating section just above the falls. Wells Creek Road also provides access to the Mt. Baker Wilderness for unique backcountry recreational opportunities. From the Falls one could hike up Wells Creek to the foot of Mt Baker. The Excelsior Group Campground, Excelsior 8 Whatcom County Planning and Development Service, "Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan" (2018), Chapter 7. Pass Trailhead, and High Divide Trailhead are less than a mile from the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave along Mt. Baker Highway. As such, Nooksack Falls, the hydroelectric power plant, and the surrounding area offer unique recreational opportunities to Whatcom County. Several improvements at the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave are necessary for further recreational use. At present, the facilities on -site are inadequate for the volume of use and interest they receive on an annual basis; the parking lot is not large enough, the hiking trail to the Falls viewpoint is difficult to navigate and unsafe, and there are no toilet facilities at the trailhead. The owner of the Property and The Upper Nooksack River Recreation Plan Advisory Committee have both indicated an interest in improving the site. Included in the list of "Specific Recommendations" in the UNRRP is the construction of restroom facilities at the Falls parking lot and improvement of the trail so that it is ADA-accessible.9 The property owner has indicated that he would like to make improvements in order to increase safety and accessibility to the Falls, and possibly add improved parking, improved trails, restrooms, and a viewing platform for the Falls. Improvement of the Falls area is consistent with many Goals and Policies in the Recreation Chapter: Goal 9C. Expand outdoor recreation opportunities for county residents by providing enjoyable trails for hiking, horseback riding, bicycling, walking, boating, and other trail activities in a safe environment. Policy 9C-1: Trails should be interesting and attractive. Trails which follow natural water courses, pass significant natural resources, traverse interesting scenery or cross areas of outstanding beauty provide interesting and enjoyable experiences for the trail user. Policy 9C-3: Trails should link other recreational uses in the Foothills area and connect to existing trail systems in the National Forest and state land. Policy 9C-7. Hiking trails should have a variety of lengths and grades for casual strollers as well as serious hikers and when practicable, be accessible. Policy 9C-10: Adequate parking, signage, trash receptacles, and toiletfacilities should be provided at all major trailheads. Goal 91: Develop a stronger financial base for recreational services: Policy 91-1: Design future recreation facilities and areas with the ability to charge user fees. Policy 91-2: Explore new innovative methods of financing facility development, maintenance, and operating needs. Policy 91-4: Seek to design and develop facilities that will encourage tourism. 10 9 Upper Nooksack River Recreation Plan Advisory Committee (UNRRPAC), "Upper Nooksack River Recreation Plan" (2015), pp. 35, 64. io Whatcom County Planning and Development Service, "Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan" (2018), Chapter 9. 93 WHATCOM COUNTY Mark Personius, AICP Planning & Development Services Director 5280 Northwest Drive Bellingham,y R WA 98226-9097 A& j lu�a ti.aJi��LiJ i SE:k'4�ItE5 360-778-5900, TrY 800-833-6384 PLANNI�� & 360-778-5901 Fax DEC 31 2019 PDS@whatcomcounty.us Comprehensive Plan and/or RECEIVED Development Regulation Amendment Application Date Received: File #: PL'V 2 L" 7-0— Please check one or more of the following amendment types: ❑✓ Comprehensive Plan Map ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text ❑ Development Regulation Map ❑✓ Development Regulation Text This form should be used for proposed amendments to the following development regulations in the Whatcom County Code: • Title 16 - Environment, • Title 20 - Zoning, • Title 21 - Land Division Regulations, and • Title 23 - Shoreline Management Program. Topic of Proposed Amendment: Remove the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave properties (3 tax parcels) from their current MRL Comprehensive Plan designation (retain underlying RF zoning designation). Add language to WCC 20.42.155 (RF conditional uses) to include the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 1 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 A. General Information — All applicants must complete this section. Applicant Name: Ali Taysi / AVT Consulting Mailing Address: 1708 F St City Bellingham State WA Zip Code 98225 Phone # (360) 527-9445 Email ali@avtplanning.com Agent/Contact Name: same as applicant Mailing Address: State Zip Code_ Phone # Email City Please complete the questions below. Attach additional pages as needed B. For Map Amendments Parcel Information Tax Parcel Number(s) (APN) 4008315801500000 & 4008314502000000 & 3908065505500000 Total Acreage - Gross _ —60 acres Net: —60 acres Site Address 12251 Mt Baker Highway. Access off Wells Creek Road Township:40 Range: 08 Section: 31 1/4 Section: Owner Name Excelsior Properties LLC & Excelsior Properties II LLC Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1432 State ID Zip Code 83501 Phone # Email arch@westford.co City Lewiston 1. Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) 2. Existing Zoning Designation: Rural Forestry (RF) 3. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural Forestry (RF) 4. Proposed Zoning Designation: Rural Forestry (RF) 5. The Present Use of the Property is: The Nooksack Falls Area is a popular tourist destination along the Mt Baker Highway with upwards of 50,000 annual visitors. The Property is used for recreation activities, including hiking, picnicking, wildlife viewing, visiting the Falls, cross country skiing and other similar activities. The Falls road provides access to Wells Creek which serves hiking areas in the Mt Baker wilderness. The Area is also developed with a power generation facility, associated outbuildings and infrastructure, and a single-family residence. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 2 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 6. The Intended Future Use of the Property is: There are no planned changes at this time to the uses on the property. The property owner would like to improve the recreational component of the property at some point in the future, in order to increase safety and accessibility to the Falls, and possibly adding improved parking, improved trails, a viewing platform for the Falls, a small cafe, an educational center, and/or rental cabins. None of these uses are proposed at this time of in the immediate future and no detailed plans have been prepared for any of these uses. 7. Surrounding Land Use: Rural Forestry and National Forest 8. Services: Please provide the following information regarding the availability of services: The site is currently served by: ❑ Sewer ❑✓ Septic If sewer the purveyor is: N/A The site is currently served by: ❑ Public Water System ❑✓ _Well If public water the purveyor is: N/A The site is located on a: ❑ Public Road ❑✓ Private Road Name of Road: Wells Creek Road & Excelsior Group Site Road Fire District #: 19 Name: Glacier Fire District School District #: 507 Name: Mt Baker School District Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 3 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 C. For Text Amendments: Identify the sections of the Comprehensive Plan and/or development regulation that you are proposing to change and provide the proposed wording. WCC 20.42.155 The operations of facilities intended to provide education related to forestry, natural resources and wildlife and the purpose of this district, including but not limited to demonstration of forests and conservation laboratories, educational meeting facilities and related uses including rental cabins or other lodging structures, cooking and dining facilities, retail sales or meeting supplies and gifts, in the Foothills Subarea, South Fork Valley, the Newhalem Exclave and the Baker Lake Exclave <and the Nooksack Falls Exclave>, provided the following standards are met: D. For All Amendments: 1. Why is the amendment needed and being proposed? The amendment is necessary to add the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave to WCC 20.42.155 to provide the opportunity in the future for a possible educational center, cafe, lodging structures and other improvements related to access and safety, as well as interface with the historic power generation facility. The MRL Comprehensive Plan designation restricts the allowed uses at the Property and no mining is anticipated in the future. Removing this designation will facilitate future site improvements and the maintenance of this valuable and unique recreation and tourism opportunity in Whatcom County. 2. How does the proposed amendment conform to the requirements of the Growth Management Act? The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act because it will help to preserve and enhance a unique existing County tourist destination, while also preserving natural and sensitive areas, surrounding forestry uses and other activities. Preservation and enhancement of the Nooksack Falls Area as a privately held but publicly accessible tourist destination is consistent with GMA requirements related to environment, economics and other statewide land use goals. The proposed amendments will facilitate the continuation of the Falls as a tourist destination. 3. How is the proposed amendment consistent with the County -Wide Planning Policies for Whatcom County? Similarly, preservation and enhancement of the Nooksack Falls area as a tourist destination is consistent with County Wide Planning Policies, which encourage environmental preservation, economic development, support for our unique natural areas, tourism, and other relevant land use goals and policies. The proposed amendments will facilitate the continuation of the Falls as a tourist destination. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 4 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 4. How is the proposed amendment consistent with the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan? See response to #3 above. 5. If within an Urban Growth Area, how is the proposed amendment consistent with interlocal agreements between the County and the City? N/A 6. What changed conditions or further studies indicate a need for the amendment? The long term viability of the power generation facility is unclear and the property owners need to explore ways to enhance and improve the public access to the Falls, for both safety and security purposes, as well as to explore alternative sources of revenue. As interest in the Falls has increased over the years, and more people access the area, concerns have arisen regarding public safety. 7. How will the public interest be served by the amendment? Please address the factors identified below. • The anticipated effect upon the rate or distribution of population growth, employment growth, development, and conversion of land as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. • The anticipated effect upon the ability of the County and/or other service providers, such as cities, schools, water and/or sewer purveyors, fire districts, and others as applicable, to provide adequate services and public facilities including transportation facilities. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 5 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 • Anticipated impact upon designated agricultural, forest and mineral resource lands. The public interest will be served by the continuation of the Falls use as a tourist destination. The Falls are privately owned and operated and if the site can't be maintained and improved in a financially viable way then public access may not be sustainable in the long term. The proposal will not alter population growth or distribution, economic development or any other listed factor. The proposal will not alter demand on schools or utilities, and any future development would be required to address impacts to Fire, Life Safety, Transportation or other impacts. The proposal will have no impact on agricultural or forest lands. Removal of the MRL designation will not impact mineral resource lands because the three mining claims that make up the Falls are not commercially viable for mining activity, due to topography, environmental restrictions and other factors. The value of the Falls as a tourist destination far outweighs any mineral resource value. 8. Does the amendment include or facilitate illegal spot zoning? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No Please explain. E. Supporting Information — Attach the Following: A. A vicinity map showing property lines, roads, existing and proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations. (This information is required for map amendments only). B. Mailing labels with names and mailing addresses of the owners of all property included within the area proposed for re -designation and: • For a map amendment within an existing urban growth area, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. • For a map amendment outside existing urban growth areas, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 1,000 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 6 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 • For map amendments that involve rezoning property to an Airport Operations District, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 1,500 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. • For map amendments that involve rezoning property to a Mineral Resource Land (MRL) designation, mailing labels with the typed address of each property owner within 2,000 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property as shown by the records of the county assessor. C. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist D. For Comprehensive Plan map amendments that propose to re -designate property to a MRL designation, a Comprehensive Plan MRL Application Supplement form is required. F. Fees Applicants pay a docketing fee when submitting an application and additional amendment application fees if the County Council decides to docket the application. The Whatcom County Code 22.10.020(3)(b) states that, when docketing an application, the county council may waive the application fees if it finds the proposed amendment would clearly benefit the community as a whole. A. Are you requesting that the County Council waive the application fees? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No If so, please describe how the proposed amendment clearly benefits the community as a whole. The Falls are a County wide community asset, and are unique in that a private property owner voluntarily allows public access to the Falls for a variety of recreational purposes, while also maintaining a functional private business enterprise that provides renewable and efficient energy sources to the residents of the County all the way to Kendall. This property owner is interested in future improvement and enhancement of the Falls, which would generate greater interest and support not only the specific site, but recreational tourism in the Mt Baker National Park area in general. This supports businesses in Glacier and other Foothills communities, supports Mt Baker Ski Area, and has the potential to provide jobs and other benefits in the area. If the power generation facility closes and/or the tourism component of the Falls is not sustainable this will damage the community as a whole. The proposed amendments will facilitate future development actions at the Falls, increasing their long term viability, and benefiting the community as a whole. NOTE: Fees will be assessed in accordance with the Whatcom County Unified Fee Schedule (UFS) in effect at the time of application submittal. Please contact Planning and Development Services to determine project specific fees. Click here to see the 2019/2020 UFS. Per UFS 2843 all permits and applications are subject to a Technology fee. The fee is calculated on the permit/application fees due. Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 7 of 8 P1-4-84-001-A February 2019 E. Authorization Signature of Applicant(s) or Agent: Date. Date: ate: 12/30/19 Comprehensive Plan and/or Development Regulation Amendment Application Page 8 of 8 PL4-84-001-A February 2019 . �... �..�.. _. �. _. _. �. _.......... _. �..`. _ CANADA GlrTcier Ptiblic UNITED STATES Sarviee tet' 94 MOUNT BAKER-SNOQUALMIE Glacier k NATIONAL FOREST i icrref itev Meadows VICINITY M A P r , Baker• "Statio)1 Sedro-Woollev MT BAKER RANGER DISTRICT .Vnlrer:alPark Mount 53 Vernon 1�I RrrrrfleT• Station +T7 ti. (� DARRINGTON Granite �d RANGER DISTRICT y. Falls Mi.'Bakei•-Srioquidtide 1,tc� Mitiowd Fovest 92 i'e r1 PuITlTc; ., Ileaclyttcrr•ler's �� Srrt}ir��('r�Ti[eT• Everett 2 SKYKOMISH _ RANGER DISTRICT 2 �t[trlrl[Tr' HL'L'!.'t Ltt lllil 20 ••• Sl:ykotnisl� , Infw�nuttirin ['[•rifr•ii Srrrtlte !tli� Skykonzis'h i�rtrrrler• Stretrnrt Seattle© Bellevue North B,endk Siwrtt�itllitie. ��� tdrotyrt�tifcltiott la ■ QSTtogwx1Trtie Pass Visitor, Center' ti SNOQUAILMI E to RANGER DISTRICT' Tacoma rrjEnumclaw O O �`i A \ 43 Office - \ f'OmN E. WASHINGTON Sit- t Creek 1"� Wowif tilfr• er 1�i Sita T' [.PTitC_T Y 4iunf+fN7 r'r..; I OKANOGAN WE'NA[CFIF':E NATIONAL FORIS'[ 4 DK.'V'f •A" API' .AI('[II1 l�llil - N Forest Headquarters W-46-41 E Ranger District Office r�15�,v s Visitor Information Center • • • • Ranger District Boundary Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest National Forest '.I s o s to is Miles 0 Keen um 22 M—h 2016 Q USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. r LU U ; Z '% W ry 0 __ W [!7 W 0 fy- LL 0 C Z Z_ Q ~ �- Z f!) X W LL el Z WHATCOM COUNTY Planning & Development Services 5280 Northwest Drive Bellingham, WA 98226-9097 360-778-5900, TTY 800-833-6384 360-778-5901 Fax Purpose of Checklist: Mark Personius, AICP Director 1A' �1 SEP SEPA Environmental Checklist Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use `not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Non -Project Proposals: For non -project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the Supplemental Sheet for Non -project Actions (Part Q. Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proponent" and "affected geographic area", respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 1 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only A Background 1 Name of proposed project, if applicable: Nooksack Falls Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Text Amendment 2 Name of applicant: Ali Taysi / AVT Consulting LLC Applicant phone number: 360-527-9445 Applicant address: 1708 F St City, State, Zip or Postal Code: Bellingham, WA 98225 Applicant Email address: ali@avtplanning.com 3 Contact name: Same as applicant Contact phone number: Contact address: City, State, Zip or Postal Code: Contact Email address: 4 Date checklist prepared: 12.31.18 5 Agency requesting checklist: Whatcom County 6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Legislative process in 2020. No project is proposed at this time. 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes [7 No ❑ If yes, explain: If the proposed amendments are approved then at some time in the future an application may be made for development of the property with a variety of recreational uses. No plans are in place at this time for any specific development proposals. 8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: None 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Yes [] No 0 If yes, explain. None Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 of 20 Form P1-4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only 10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask You to describe certain aspects of your ,proposal. You do not need to re eat those answers on this Dage. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposal is to remove the MRL designation on the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave and replace this with a standard RF designation. The underlying zoning is currently RF but the Comp Plan designation is MRL, which limits the permitted uses for the property. The proposal includes a change in the zoning text for WCC 20.42,155 to include the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave. The proposal would apply to the entire Nooksack Falls Area Exclave, which consists of three tax parcels (3 mining claims) totaling approximately 60 acres. No specific development is proposed at this time, only the plan amendments. 12 Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is located on Wells Creek Road, off Mt Baker Highway (SR542). Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 3 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only B Environmental Elements 1 Earth a. General description of the site: Flat _ Rolling Hilly Steep Slopes Mountainous Other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Unknown. 50%? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. No soil information available on USDA Soil Survey online. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling excavation or grading proposed. None. Indicate source of fill. None. Indicate were excavation material is going. None. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 4 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, generally describe. N/A g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Non. No activity is proposed. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation and maintenance when the project is completed (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, or industrial wood smoke)? None. If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only 3. Water a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? Yes F*7 No ❑ If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Nooksack River and Wells Creek are in the vicinity. Numerous small creeks and drainages criss cross the property, all flowing into the Nooksack River. (2) Will the project require any work over in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No work is proposed. (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Yes ❑ No 1v1 Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? Yes ❑ No Q If so, note location on the site plan. N/A Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 6 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only (5) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge N/A b. Ground Water: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals.....; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Currently storm water runoff is generated from the existing road and parking lot, which are gravel. This runoff disperses into the adjacent forested areas. No changes are proposed to any roads/parking areas with this proposal. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 7 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only Where will this water flow? N/A Will this water flow into other waters? Yes L] No 7 If so, describe. N/A (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, generally describe. (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site: Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, describe. No work is proposed d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A 4 Plants a. Check types of vegetation found on the site: ❑✓ Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑✓ Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑✓ Shrubs ❑ Grass ❑ Pasture ❑ Crop or grain ❑ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops ❑ Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ❑ Other types of vegetation Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed Evaluation For By Applicant Agency Use Only b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known. 5. Animals a. Check any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: J Hawk, ❑ Heron, J Eagle, 0 Songbirds; ❑ Other: Mammals: J Deer, ❑ Bear, J Elk, Beaver; Other: Fish: ❑ Bass, ❑ Salmon, ❑ Herring, _Trout, Shellfish; Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 9 of 20 Form PI-4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed Evaluation For By Applicant Agency Use Only c. Is the site part of a migration route? Yes 0 No ❑ If so, explain. The entire Pacific Northwest is a part of the Pacific Flyway. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A e. List any invasive species known to be on or near site. None known. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None. b. Would your project affect the Mi tential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? Yes ❑ No If so, generally describe. N/A c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, describe. No work is proposed. (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 of 20 Form PI-4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. No development is proposed. There are no hazardous chemicals currently in use at the site. The site does include a power generation facility. No changes are proposed to these existing conditions. (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the projects development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None. Power is generated at the facility, which is secure, and has been in operation for over 100 years. (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. (5) Proposed measure to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None. No development is proposed. (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page it of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed Evaluation For By Applicant Agency Use Only 8 Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? Yes ❑ No Q If so, describe. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, describe. How much agriculture or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? None. If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to non -farm or non -forest use? N/A (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling and harvesting? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, how: c. Describe any structures on the site. There is a power generation facility below the Falls, a single family residence, several outbuildings, roads, trails and other recreational improvements. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 12 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes ❑ No [71 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RF f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MRL g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Conservation h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ If so, specify. The area within 150' of the OHWM of the Nooksack River is considered a Habitat Conservation Area. The entire area is subject to several geohazard designations. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Application is being made for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and also Zoning Text Amendment. These requests will be reviewed and if necessary conditioned to insure compliance with land use plans. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any? None necessary. The proposal is to retain a RF designation. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 13 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only 9 Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ❑❑ High Number of Units None. Middle ❑ Low-income b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ❑ High Number of Units None. [j Middle �❑ Low-income c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10 Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11 Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 14 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12 Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Nooksack Falls and Wells Creek Road provide formal and informal opportunities for hiking, cross country skiing, wildlife viewing and other activities. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13 Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state or local preservation registers located on or near the site? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ If so, specifically describe. The power generation facility is over 45 years old. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian, historic use or occupation, this may include human burials or old cemeteries? Yes[] No ❑✓ Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 15 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples: Include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Review of historic records available from property owner, County and DAHP resources. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. N/A 14 Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plan, if any. The site is served by Mt Baker Highway (SR542), and accessed via Wells Creek Road. b. Is site or geogra hic area currently served by public transit? Yes 1-1NoLJ If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest transit stop is in Kendall, approximately 15 miles east on SR542. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? Yes ❑ No 7 If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 16 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) ❑ Water, ❑ Rail, or ❑ Air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? N/A - No change from existing conditions. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15 Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16 Utilities a. Check utilities currently available at the site: ❑✓ Electricity, ❑ Natural gas, ❑✓ Water, ❑ Refuse service, ❑✓ Telephone, ❑ Sanitary sewer, ✓ Septic system, Other Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 17 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 1100, Date Submitted: 12/31/2019 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Reviewed by Whatcom County Planning & Development Services Staff Staff Signature Date SEPA Environmental Checklist Form PL4-83-005A Reviewed by initials Page 18 of 20 January 2019 To Be Completed Evaluation For By Applicant Agency Use Only C Supplemental Sheet for Non -project Actions (It is not necessary to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1 How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would not increase discharges to water, emissions to air, or release of toxic or hazardous substances. The proposal is only to change the MRL designation to RF, which would allow a broader range of uses. No actual improvements are proposed. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Any future project proposed under the RF designation would require various County permits and reviews, which would ensure compliance with any applicable regulations, and could be conditioned to address any potential impacts. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposal would not impact plants, animals, fish or marine life. The Falls are currently utilized for recreational purposes and this would not change. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposal would not deplete energy or natural resources. It is possible that future development could utilize power from the onsite power generation facility, increasing energy efficiency at the site. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 19 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 To Be Completed By Applicant Evaluation For Agency Use Only 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposal would not change any existing uses on the property or the current access to the property or surrounding properties. Future specific use proposals would be regulated by adopted local, state and federal environmental regulations. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Any future activity or new use would be permitted through applicable local, state and federal agencies. Buffers of any environmentally sensitive areas would be protected consistent with adopted regulations. Mitigation would be provided for any unavoidable impacts. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal would not change current land and shoreline use. It is possible that future permitted activity, such as additional parking, trail improvements or other similar actions could affect land and shoreline use, but no actions are proposed at this time. All future actions would be consistent with the underlying RF zoning. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Any future activity would require permitting and this would allow conditions as necessary to ensure impacts to shoreline and land use are avoided or reduced as much as possible. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposal would not alter demand on transportation, public services or utilities. Future development could increase this demand. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No specific project is proposed, however at the time of a future project proposal, specific impacts on transportation, public services and utilities would be evaluated and any potential increases in demand would be appropriately mitigated through permit conditions. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with any local, state or federal laws related to the protection of the environment. Reviewed by initials SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 20 of 20 Form PL4-83-005A January 2019 Y � , 1 � CD O Y \ v- a � z a a a `15 yd � d3�A�'EhH rY � 00 o~ a z � < a IL a � m C fQ C � m ui 71J1 X w o ua fi d » IL V/ z o (, z O Q LiN W � 1 � K V uj d' z9s`s Z 9 a qb' PZP d z �� U U ape) M Q r Z �� ;z p ZW[V LLJQ Q O U ;: W = = N }�O) � oo II �w N a coo 0 0 fro OV)U)U- uj w(NV)OQ JWQ 0 f I1 (N d' PO I f;� 3� z U� ow�oao w » x� �z rn �.... II LOUoo j¢mcoQ oUiW N NO�OW OZ fF( �aCLa_I WZxu- fi W � � LQ ~W f=1� m fl Z W W W H I W W W� Zo�tcoo a �. I 1�� N m 0 0 _© 1 1 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 111776 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 wnatcom Lounty Assessor & I reasurer Property Search Results > 111776 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 Property Account Property ID: 111776 Legal Description: TR IN SECS 5-6 39-8E-IN SECS 31-32 40- 8E-THAT PTN OF FOL PATENTED LODE MINING CLAIMS IN MT BAKER MINING DISTRICT BEING PTN OF MINERAL CERTIFICATE 157 DESC AF 93373 DAF- ALL WELLS CREEK-NOOKSACK LODES- SELY 100 FT OF SWLY 472 FT OF NWLY LI OF NOOKSACK LODE Parcel # / Geo ID: 3908065505500000 Agent Code: Type: Real Tax Area: 7002 - 507 R L Land Use Code 85 Open Space: N DFL N Historic Property: N Remodel Property: N Multi -Family Redevelopment: N Township: T39N Section: 06 Range: R08E Legal Acres: 25.0100 Location Address: MT BAKER HWY Mapsco: MOUNT BAKER, WA Neighborhood: 3270027900 Map ID: 3JS RNG6-E Neighborhood CD: 3270027900 Owner Name: EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES LLC Owner ID: 40490 Mailing Address: PO BOX 1432 % Ownership: 100.0000000000% LEWISTON, ID 83501-1432 Exemptions: Pay Tax Due Taxes and Assessment Details Values Map List Taxing Jurisdiction Improvement / Building Sketch No sketches available for this property. http://property.whatcomcounty. us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year-2018&prop_id=111776 1 /4 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 111776 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 This property contains TIFF images. Click on the button(s) to download the full image (which may contain multiple pages), r ooea wcsa xa WHATCOM COUNTY ASSESSOR CM C ulAMM WN l,tl W Dull rw.rlW�ooalE 7N7�S6L Mw.w/w � fW ICiM.�•""- ./�a1'EMMfpEµ.rlrWi ^T r 1 fgvrry Il 1 E.WyCwn 11 4t— p 1 M7Q^I E ire. r� sr. Y YMY Y h.�aty 11 �Jw .GrYM foci yuwanE �1 WICfM+�+ N a�GIH • �f MY hE.we n rrwl.r u.lr hpplf wro Ela rr.lafalrE •1 FN dlFw14..1� S/ MR14�M4r ]1 lwl r..Nr1Y Mro11R ]1 Ca•MM H 1 F..IIwfC I.r4. PM 1, e0 4.Ir v G 1600 1.41.• M LFr u a rrf.1 F1. Cwi !! ri. f R .l FnYp. a lI-*CMa.L"giwiw Wn/iA 1! f1.1..>r.. P.M~ a o.nsmr.0 FA orrr rmuEEIB nor.crow 38 Tw Row— Row Mule a r.. fnl w..••..e....F..t �.+.� le rs o�.Irrea I+,.F a•..-�•w .w.. rr�.l....r Ir. Torn _eo v. l� N.oY..ak r.E. Pe1w w.M F laelFloFaY� EEmmouamEe �+Fl.u....>eF.,�F,� .r. na re.11r..d wr ert.o l.l. ,.••rx Ic+o.. .Irlf+w Ip11 •F'rn.I.r•Wrw FLUME I" Mtiw..n. el.�n><.exaf.rw �Tw r,s. rw• ]wlrvra PIPF'M i� Iw..a I.1rhr RUM my ll.MrrlMwlrl.a 1..Vp rppll[Illn. p.ti�l it lrrNN.IrL w•1W gIR""W T". •Erliml/mww.np foflCJI yq/r NOr1116e0 an, 1 Tpyp.�r. .014W Er HDM ]b•I•.4IIiEm1.1F11Pa1roT era TM olF.W n.,.w..,e,r.wlnFd.al.rvinr-roro lmnn•.-�+. 090MOE f w"l Cgw*t.Fb-F.®ir. •!Cr T1r. 1w-ro,F a r®Fw.Mr 7R.IIvfJllllal aaoro TM r m.1...f•e.. rr...r.�..aa+.w. http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=111776 2/4 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer -Property Details - 111776 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 n,1--11 iA'M9 WON Ct4U La PARUE LNUMBEH _"�•�'�.• •_.:JJL"'Jib' .`v, 0_ ADDRFAX: _�2-4 flehlf¢-r• lks?I so"Id w 71,s rkfw )r �sre 7M Y �r sloe r Gr mr C fill M � .py C�IY�p ++ w w 7ae0— of C..* M- M UY i "OW 'nsi M Ye IWr �fal"WYlnr annwl00"M • v # Type Description Acres Sqft Eff Front Eff Depth Market Value Prod. Value 1 8590 MINING CLAIM 25.0100 1089435.60 0.00 0.00 $12,505 $0 Rol! Value History Deed and Sales History # Deed Type Description Grantor Grantee Volume Page Sale Excise Deed Date Price Number Number http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=111776 3/4 12/31 /2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer -Property Details - 111776 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 1 04/08/2004 QUIT QUIT CLAIM PUGET EXCELSIOR 0 $0.00 200494325 2040403394 CLAIM DEED SOUND PROPERTIES HYDRO LLC LLC Payout Agreement Assessor Home Treasurer Home Websitc version: 9.0,40.29 Database Fast updated on: 12/31/2018 2::34 AM U 1 http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year-2018&prop_id=111776 4/4 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer Property Search Results > 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 Property Account Property ID: 147508 Legal Description: TR IN SECS 31-32 40-8E-IN SECS 5-6 39-8E DAF-ALL IRON CAP LODE-NWLY 600 FT AS MEAS ALG NELY LI OF MINNEHAHA LODE BEING PATENTED LODE MINING CLAIMS-PTN OF MINERAL CERTIFICATE 157 DESC AF 93373 Parcel # / Geo ID: 4008314502000000 Type: Real Tax Area: 7002 - 507 R L Open Space: N Historic Property: N Multi -Family Redevelopment: N Township: T40N Range: R08E Location Address: 12251 MT BAKER HWY Neighborhood: Neighborhood CD Owner Name: Mailing Address: MOUNT BAKER, WA 3270027900 3270027900 Agent Code: Land Use Code 48 DFL N Remodel Property: N Section: 31 Legal Acres: 20.7300 Mapsco: Map ID: EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC Owner ID: PO BOX 1432 % Ownership: LEWISTON, ID 83501-1432 Exemptions: Pay Tax Due Taxes and Assessment Details Values Map List Taxing Jurisdiction Improvement / Rijilding 3C3_SLVRLK 501699 100.0000000000 Improvement #1: COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT State Code: 4812 3104.0 sqft Value: $1,583,549 HVAC: SPHT LIFE EXPECTANCY: 35 Sub Year Type Description Cass Class Built Area CD C-MISC IMP COMCL Misc Lump Sum Imp C 1906 1500.0 MA Main Area 1 C LC 1906 2400.0 MA Main Area 1 D A 1906 704.0 Improvement #2: 1.5 STORY (Finished) State Code: 4812 2256.0 sqft Value: $181,912 http://property.whatcomcounty. us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 IWF 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 Exterior Wall: SI/ST Fixtures: 10 Floor Cov Adj: Base Allowance Flooring: CARPT Foundation: CONPR Full Baths: 2 Heating/Cooling: F/A Interior Finish: FIN Number of Bedrooms: 4 Roof Covering: METAL Type Description Class Sub Class Year Area CD CD Built MA Main Area 1 AVG + * 2004 1224.0 STOR ADDNS-Storage Bldg GOOD * 1910 528.0 MA2 Main Area 2 AVG + * 2004 1032.0 Deck Deck AVG 2004 192.0 SM STORAGE ON SEPARATE IMPROVEai£tir [ArC3 "JA [f°] .4e RIVER TO SOUTH e.s F 1ia .6 daft Property Image This property contains TIFF images. Click on the button(s) to download the full image (which may contain multiple pages). http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 2/11 12/31 /2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 V.... WHATC OM COUNTY A MSOR cALCVu RCuerroar cyzz r.nnwairncRrnw . a.rrw .wr r ram. •rnrrnrw . rrer w n w rv.ww r ur •l w rowww fi11Wf/Wf n� %Lrw.IwrM +r wa •w.w. rnxrAw w�pti�rrrrr� l0 Mq+tiMll+l.w r� MM n..rwMwl•� n p.wn aw rrn rrtu.a.Annr x r�..yncr w r.rhaw 74. ■r.rr rr r..w — x r r.wwa or - n n e..r.�.ior ..•..� MrlLOIML MK�rr Y Tq r4r..Fr Gw1 ��.i:iiw•r•n. pwwry v.xarxv+rw IsIRM hMMMRR Z . • — __ I ao"no a q H MvOR rw rer ■ = rr r x w a � A N'�ir 1M h crd ru rMr .* wnr�.r.r ORM"Waftwiw GOMM= http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 3/11 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer- Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 WHATCOM COUNTY ASSESSOR 6AUVL{TOM WIT /Or WIPE— w:ronrupre d rllovnelrl onasnola . aa+.rar n vldap of aye. e ergo. . nrvonr r. e.rw VAe e elwn 1Iti ru.� .e TTdrEaMp� --- q 0.. k yxW pR�}e�ergdwu» » ar1rc = 11 pa.M It r»e ,1{ Tnp 1/w •11! I�rrMgeler lleaAea» �. » ly d paw»Iaaa ee elrnrnp lAplrr At rx Ca✓twlr K emO0 Yarl.r nI4LL CYwq X W W F rk M fl rL Dade e. o+uw( 11Yn`. ee.l..r la+rr »MF nCap ». caul l4 nee. » Ilr 11.Aspw Y » Irm ew yr�wla na en`dpa.re� er. o— err`a4 » ogw..vw. ee C4nra.afarl M 0elLL NPIIgMe ».Tmuuwuovww e•. http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 4/11 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 5/11 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 6/11 12/31 /2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 Poeerhous ' r hftp://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 7/11 12/31 /2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 qW W YI11w http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 8/11 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 v I w i-Pet. ra. k4WM W W r�rl fiUdnIA- Tbw* <u4 swmww u Now T1ry swu ■I r <w* made i 2d acreklull 1Fdn omgk lwmo. calow It had der ac he wb w *m wapffv hx e.b. uy.aoa, r,d4..d ilq sa,l timW6. b 990 iw- I% two, "A .eesdr E&Vw dw Carwwwl Mi �� �r'IaJu� Mi drew rll �� Ihll C+arw� ♦tad �r1q at aW 4" la ON ft +rlwr 14 1 •.rf. ap"0tr>n 1 In 1903 thm dn+r -w ► %Gtt w„ Bwor4Mre, la rpm al oyu 4N 01V c4mm" ■awwd 11 MC a 14 61M4■lmdw tewwrw" %b w. UN& CAMS and 1eellw 60 had do#Ir 11N a mmm" M bo Ale t4 Iln hyirww"k all ai a F"w C~t rar raft a nm .wmFkkm" bNomee of amm &aw dw of Ow prgww w Irwe b=mmmd wed a ""N dyad !4 pwa 9 q V-10e awd moo liW m06wW Code VANWAe Gi Enter Stone & Webster i;-! , *w-.....-,it F ,jwrrr iu Il i" am W IW14 w►4k wLm* oslaarkw r .7 http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 9/11 12/31 /2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 10/11 12/31 /2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147508 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 # Type Description Acres Sqft Eff Front Eff Depth Market Value Prod. Value 1 4812 ELEC GEN PLT 1.0000 43560.00 0.00 0.00 $100,000 $0 2 4812 ELEC GEN PLT 19.7300 8S9438.80 0.00 0.00 $9,865 $0 Roll Value History Deed and Sales History Deed Type Description Grantor Grantee Volume Page Sale Price Excise Deed Date Number Number 1 02/19/2013 SWD SWD PUGET EXCELSIOR $1,958,230.00 175514 2130202399 SOUND PROPERTIES HYDRO II LLC LLC 147509 EXCELSIOR MT TR IN SECS 31-32 40-8E-IN SECS 5-6 39-8E THAT PTN OF PROPERTIES BAKER FOL PATENTED LODE MINING CLAIMS IN MT BAKER II LLC HWY MINING DISTRICT BEING PTN OF MINERAL CERTIFICATE MOUNT 157 DESC AF 93373 DAF-MINNEHAHA LODE-EXC NWLY BAKER, 600 WA 2 04/08/2004 QUIT QUITCLAIM PUGET PUGET 0 $0.00 200494323 2040403396 CLAIM DEED SOUND SOUND HYDRO HYDRO LLC LLC Payout Agreement Assessor Home Treasurer Home fratataass� last Lip ii ared on: 12JaIn(I1S 2 3aAt, I http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147508 11/11 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147509 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer Property Search Results > 147509 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 Property Account Property ID: 147509 Legal Description: TR IN SECS 31-32 40-8E-IN SECS 5-6 39-8E THAT PTN OF FOL PATENTED LODE MINING CLAIMS IN MT BAKER MINING DISTRICT BEING PTN OF MINERAL CERTIFICATE 157 DESC AF 93373 DAF-MINNEHAHA LODE-EXC NWLY 600 Parcel # / Geo ID: 4008315801500000 Type: Real Tax Area: 7002 - 507 R L Open Space: N Historic Property: N Multi -Family Redevelopment: N Township: T40N Range: R08E Location Address: MT BAKER HWY Neighborhood: Neighborhood CD: Owner Name: Mailing Address: MOUNT BAKER, WA 3270027900 3270027900 Agent Code: Land Use Code 85 DFL N Remodel Property: N Section: 31 Legal Acres: 20.3900 Mapsco: Map ID: EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC Owner ID: PO BOX 1432 % Ownership: LEWISTON, ID 83501-1432 Exemptions: Pay Tax Due Taxes and Assessment Details Values Map List Taxing Jurisdiction Improvement / Building Sketch No sketches available for this property. Property Image No image available for this property. Land 3JS_RNG6-E 501699 100.0000000000% http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccessIProperty.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147509 1 /2 12/31/2018 Whatcom County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 147509 EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES II LLC for Year 2018 - 2019 # Type Description Acres Sqft Eff Front Eff Depth Market Value Prod. Value 1 8590 MINING CLAIM 20,3900 888188.40 0,00 0.00 $20,390 $0 Roll Value History Deed and Sales History # Deed Type Description Grantor Grantee Volume Page Sale Price Excise Deed Date Number Number 1 02/19/2013 SWD SWD PUGET EXCELSIOR $1,958,230.00 175514 2130202399 SOUND PROPERTIES HYDRO II LLC LLC 147508 EXCELSIOR 12251 PROPERTIES MT II LLC BAKER HWY MOUNT BAKER, WA TR IN SECS 31-32 40-8E-IN SECS 5-6 39-8E DAF-ALL IRON CAP LODE-NWLY 600 FT AS MEAS ALG NELY LI OF MINNEHAHA LODE BEING PATENTED LODE MINING CLAIMS-PTN OF MINERAL CERTIFICATE 157 DESC AF 93373 2 04/08/2004 QUIT QUITCLAIM PUGET PUGET CLAIM DEED SOUND SOUND HYDRO HYDRO LLC LLC Payout Agr(2(--�fawnt V•7,•I,•.11r•--r•, , 14fJ.110. j 0 teas Arer Horfle i r�r.�ir.•-, I.1a 1.'.la112101f 1, dAld1 $0.00 200494324 2040403395 http://property.whatcomcounty.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2018&prop_id=147509 2/2 f 2130202399 Pepe: 1 of 6 2/19/2013 4:65 PM DEED $77.00 WA AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: wCcounty, Raqueet of: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE Brett N. Wiese Inslee, Best, ISoezie & Ryder, P.S. 717 - 108th Avenue N.E., Suite 1900 P. O. Box 90016 - Bellevue, WA 9800-9016 `STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Grantor(s): ' Puget Sound Hydro, L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company, Grantee(s): _ -Excelsior Properties II, LLC, a Washington limited liability company o. � 1 4 Abbreviated Legal PTN SEC 31,.AND 32 TWP 40N RGE 8E AND SEC 5 AND 6 Description: TWP 39N RGE 8E,, .WHATCOM COUNTY (Complete"legal. description on Exhibit A) . Y Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 400831 450200 0000/RID # 147508 400831 580150 0000/PID #147509 THE GRANTOR, PUGET SOUND HYDRQ, -1:.L.C:,- a Washington limited liability company, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.G0) in hand paid, conveys and warrants to GRANTEE, EXCELSIOR PROPERTIES 11, LLC, a Washington, limited liability company, the following described real estate, situated in the unincorporated County of Whatcom, State of Washington: - See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof,as if set forth herein (the "Property") - RESERVING THEREFROM: All right, title, and interest in 'and to water r"ights claim #85 associated with, used in connection with, and/or appurtenant I the..Property; k y _ RESERVING THEREFROM: All right, title, and interest in and- o- the `Project"' as defined in Section 1.14 of that certain Power Purchase Agreement dated as.of"Septernber 26, 2008, between Puget Sound Energy, Inc. ("PSE") and Tenant or Section 1.16-of that certain Schedule 91 Power Purchase Agreement between PSE and Tenant issued'October 13, 2008 (collectively the "PPA"), or (ii) the "Generating Facility" as' defined "in , 436121.3 136266010001 -1- - 1676709 175514 *2/1912013 10.00* AUachment 1 to that certain Schedule 80 Interconnection Agreement between PSE and r-Tecant issued January 31, 2008 (the "1CA"), RESERVING T14EREFROM: All right, title, and interest for PSE to travel across certain portions 'of the Property necessary to access the "Project" and the "Generating Facility" (as such terms are defined above) in accordance with the terms and conditions, of the licenses and permits granted by Grantor to PSE as specifically set f4th in the• PPA 10d 14e ICA. 4 � ,• r. SUBJECT TO'-. the Notice set forth -on attached Exhibit B. r 4 r• DATED: February ^, 2013. ' GRANTOR: ` -PVGET SOUND HYDRO, L.L.C., a ashington r , Jirnited liability c pany F yti� 4 f' 5 r r r� • y B • y .Arch or , rb. age 1 r' ri a r"' '• � •a r , r,r / r ti / + r e •4 r /• 1 � 1 r I a x. r tr•� ,fit r. r r i . `•rr•r r' 7• r F 4 r"+ f r 436121.3136266010001 -2- a_ r STATE M WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY Of'� ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ARCH FORD is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument as the Co -Manager on behalf of PUGET SOUND -HYDRO, L.L.C.-, a Washington limited liability company, pursuant to the provisions of the Limited Liability Company Agreement of said company, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary -act of.said company for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. L r• . h %J1'�+��'4 ^ 'DATED: c �/ Q,dAlfli�f 0TA►�L NAME: y N ;� A�1B�-/�► j Q : . ' r , (Print Name) =, �'•. �o��;•��']]�"�,.�' r 'NQtaiy Public in and for the S to of Washington raj �•�....• i ,tip WA5�; lCommi"ssion Expires: 1/ �`�h+l1+i1►1N��� � r - L � • 5 ry • r r' - r r 1 • k � - � t 4 y •' L J •� f � � � J � r+ � + + 1t - J s I a � F _ r L 1rF+Jr 1 436121.3 136266010001 1• � s ♦ • •- EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property REAL PROPERTY IN THE UNINCORPORATED COUNTY OF WHATCOM, STATE OF WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: i PARCEL A: r - • ` THE LAND`REFERRED TO IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF WHATCOM AND IS APPROXIMATELY LOCATED WITHIN SECTIONS 31 AND 32, TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF W.M., AND WITHIN SECTIONS 5 AND 6, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF W.M., WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL OF IRON CAP LODE AND THE NORTHWESTERLY 600.00 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE MINNEHAHA LODE, BEING PATENTED LOAD MINING CLAIMS AND PART OF MINERAL CERTIFICATE NO. 157, AS�SHOWN ON MINING PATENT DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 21, 1905 UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 93373. 1 PARCEL B: THE LAND REFERRED TO IS SITUATED IN THE S*I E OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF WHATCOM AND IS APPROXIMATELY LOCATED WITHIN SECTIONS 31 AND 32, TOWNSHIP 40 NORM, RANGE 8 EAST OF W.M., AND WITHIN SECTIONS S AND 6, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF W.M., WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: F THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING PATENTED LODE MINING; CLAIMS IN THE MOUNT BAKER MINING DISTRICT, BEING PART OF MINERAL CERTIFICATE NO. 157, AS SHOWN ON MINING PATENT DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 21, 1905 UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 93373, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: MINNEHAHA LODE EXCEPT THE NORTHWESTERLY'600.00 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTHEASTERLY 100.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY 472.00 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID MINNEHAHA LODE. • ALSO FALLING WATER LODE EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE LINE COMMON TO THE MINNEHAHA AND FALLING WATER LODES, 472.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY CORNER COMMON TO SAID LODES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, 355 FEET MORE OR LESS TO CORNER NO. 4 OF THE NOOKSACK LODE, COMMON TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID FALLING WATER LODE. WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ,+ APN: 400831 450200 0000/PID #147508 f APN: 400831 580150 0000/PID #147509 p 436121.3 136266010001 r 1 5• • f f r � r I j t EXHIBIT B Notice I The subject property is within or near designated forestry lands on which a variety of commercial activities may occur. The legally permissible amounts of noise, dust, smoke, traffic and fumes_ which may be generated by activities on forest land may exceed those levels conducive to a tranquil residential environment. While the application by spraying or other means afforest chemicals.may be legally permitted on forest lands, the persons making such applications and the owners of properties where such applications are being made, may be liable for loss and damages which are caused by the migration of forest chemicals from the site of the approved application. Whatcom County has determined that the use of real property for forestry operations is high priority and Favored use and will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from legally permitted forest practices, if such operations are consistent "vith the commonly,accepted best management practices and otherwise comply with local, state and federal laws., The subject property is on or'within three hundred feet of designated mineral resource land upon which a variety of -mining -related activities may occur that are not compatible with residential development for certain.periods of limited duration. Whatcom County has determined that the use of real property for.miji&al operations is a priority use in designated mineral resource lands and M11 not conSiderfo be a Auisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from mine operations, if $uch operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices and otherwise comply with local, state, and federal laws. Copies of these laws are available at -the Whatcom County Planning and Redevelopment Services Office. y J - I r a The undersigned hereby acknowl d s receipt of-6e ab,6e notice. Excelsior Pro Is IYiiabili LLCa Washing n i" it y mpany By: Arch Ford Co -Manager • - 4 4 ' - r • i "I y a■ r, 436121.3136266010001 �� f f • � r 4 f d • ^'L r STATE. OF'WASHINGTON } } ss COUNTY OF } I certify that 'I know or have satisfactory evidence that ARCH FORD is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument as the Co -Manager on behalf of PUGET SOUND'HYDRO, L.L.C.;.a Washington limited liability company, pursuant to the provisions of the Limited Liability Company Agreement of -said company, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary,act,of said compainy Ton,the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. A ,���►��►�� 0dA r ' �''4,�� ` -DATED: /-/Z- jmt;0- ■40 NAME: bZ;-sa 79 /1 L �• 1 '� (Print Name) +.,17r''•• �8•''�5��,.�'� _ �.�iotary''ublic in and for the St" of Washington '�r�►���dFtW*a►,'� r .Commission Expires: I�+�� .q ' 4 P l f r _ ,1 .t r r } r rr F'i 436121.3 136266010001 t r r • r r 1 R • "t +r • oG WHATCOM COUNTY WATER AVAILABILITY NOTIFICATION HEALTH DEPARTMENT ; IFS 509 Girard Street Bellingham, WA 98225 TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT Phone 676-6724 or 384-1528 P 3NELL SECTION ONE 40PLICABI T.,`. Environmental Health approval of this form is NOT required if your building project: JUL 2 9 2003 ❖ Does not include plumbing for potable water, or; ❖ Is a residential remodel or addition, which does not add additional bedroom(s) or ftAtPrQMcQQWfAt66or space of more than 50% or; Health Department ❖ Is replacing a permitted building, which has been demolished or removed. You must take evidence of the existence of the previous building to Whatcom County Planning & Development Services for review. The replacement building cannot have more bedrooms or more than 50% greater floor space than the previous building to be considered under this exemption. CTION TWO INSTRUCTION$ Please read the attached information carefully for full instructions on how to proceed with obtaining private well approval. Please submit this form and one copy of each document required to Whatcom County Health Department for review and approval. Please allow at least I week for the approval process. This information will be kept on file at the Environmental Health Division. Th documents required are: 1. Water Availability Notification (this form). ENTF Satisfactory bacteriolo ical test results less than 3 ears old.' ME g y Li ��3 Satisfactory inorganic chemical test results less than 3 years old. "l~ l SEP 10 2003 f41 Water well report (well log) signed by driller, including yield test. ' . Current site plan (drawn to scale) showing well iocation and distances from the well to the property lines, underground fuel storage tanks, drainfields, chemical application areas, creeks and any other potential source of contamination. X Declaration of covenant or restrictive covenant if applicable, r sanitary control zone around well . (See instructions). Building Permit Applicant's Name: EYZI-SiOf- PKoPOt2"it Current Mailing Address: R-0. F,�aac J 4 3Z City LEW i STow State 10 Zip a3501 Phone ? • �o(v� SZ 3 or Tax Parcel Number (proposed home): 3 O 042 51 O 115 10 tXvo WellTagNumberAKiNq— Address (Proposed Home): 22 SJ M 4-_ �( � ✓ Is the well located on a different lot? If yes, Tax Parcel Number: 1.1D ✓ Was this lot created by _j subdivison? If yes, Subdivison Name: W l Q Lot Slk I certify that the at cf d w r mole analyses and water yield results were obtained from the proposed source. Signature Print Name J(1e7LL , -1"74 Date 2 Q is :. Confined: Yes ❑ No ❑ own 7 va ems. S attached information on: Sanitary Control Area Radius: 50" ❑ 100" �° *4-t Arsenic ❑ B11,2-DCP �uoride �� Approv ❑ Denied Date A-S ' ;:+4 ❑ Nitrate Soditun/Chloride :Pother r 10 q- by: ❑ Mail to: Whatcom. County Environmental Health Services s" r s- 12a '7 Approval Expires: A&o3 ❑Call when ready: _ rf BOTTLE NUMBER %•u STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS SAMPLE COLLECTION: READ INSTRUCTIONS EDGE ANA LYTICAL DATE COLLECTED TIME GgU E COUNTY NAME MONTH DAY YEAR DAM 0 PM TYPE Vh SYSTEM PUBLIC SYSTEM ID# CIRCLEGROUP ❑['PUBLIC >=JIHDIVIDUAL A B NAME OF SYSTEM �0—'e W 4:�;in I ja DAY EVENING SOURCE TYPE IL—_Jy GROUND WATER UNDER SURFACE INFLUENCE IdJ ❑ SURFACE WELLor ❑ SPRNG ❑ PURCHASEO ❑ COMBINATION SEND REPORTTLk{&I Full NaWA. Address and Name ton State TYPE OF SAMPLE (check W one 'n this column) ❑ ROUTINE r] Chlorinated (Residual: _ Total _ Free) DRINKING WATER ❑ Filtered check Ireapnent _> ❑ Untreated or Other ❑ REPEAT SAMPLE Prwlous coliform pre5+mce Labs Dale ❑��RAW SOURCE WATER Source 1 � ❑ rn ❑❑ Total Colllor , NEW CONSTRUCTION or REPAIRS ❑ Fecal Colllorrn ❑ OTHER fSoeciM UDDER HEALTH SYSTEMS, Inc. 6401 OLD GUIDE ROAD BELLINGHAM WA 98226 360-398-1360 FAX 360.398.7617 (LAB V S E ONLY} DRINXING WATER RESULTS TOTAL COU FORM / 100 nd E. COLT / 100 ml FECAL COLIFORM 1100 Frill PLATE COUNT / ml ANOTHER SAMPLE REQUIRED SAMPLE NOT TESTED BECAUSE: TEST UNSUITABLE BECAUSE: ❑ Sample too old ❑ Conlluenl growth ❑ Wrong container ❑ TNTC ❑ Incomplete form ❑ Turbid culture ❑ ❑ Exc ess de bris []unsettiafactory: Coliforms present Falform Satisfactory Repeat ❑Etolt Present: ❑Ecoli Absent: absent samples Required 17FBCaI Present: nF9Cel Absent: RECEIVED: Lab No 5897563 LabDate: 5/15/800 La 13:57 LabAnalyst KO 4 02408 ReportDate 5116120D3 ❑ PHONED FA)E IJ F'N" T WATER BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS The Following are Explanations of Possible Results This water sample was examined for the presence of coliform organisms which indicate the bacteriological quality of the water. 'I'll presence of coliform organisms serve as an indicator of the possible presence of other disease causing organisms in the water. The test will detect coliform organisms at a density of 1 ormini,m pci 100 ml of water tested. There are three possible results. Front the outcome of the report on the left, choose the result 1har exactly snatches one of the following ynsihle results for the explanation of your test: 1. SATISFACTORY L_..t UNSATISFACTORY, Coldorms present tC ISFACTORY s absent REPEAT DECopmen E SAMPLES ❑ Fecal Pr I VolSbs REQUIRED There were no coliform organisms found in this sample. Proper system maintenance and annual bacteriological monitoring,IuTLtld h' continued to insure water safety. 2. COLIFORM PRESENT - WARNING {f�1 UNSATISFACTORY, Colilorms present SFACTORY REPEAT ❑ E. Col pr E s absent SAMPLES ❑ Feealpr teM REOUlRED y}}}}}���►0 Any coliform presence in a water test is unsatisfactory 3. ECOLI PRESENT - UNSAFE UNSATISFACTORY, Colilorms present IfIF1 CTORY REPEAT ®E Cof pr s absent SAMPLES ❑Fecalpre�em REC-R ED E.Coli Present or Fecal Present means that the water sample shows contact with dangerous intestinal bacteria. Do not drink this tvater. The presence of coliforms indicate the system is not properly protected against contamination and may be unsafe for human consumption. nsatisfactory samples should be investigated :End correction procedures taken immediate. A repeat sample should be submitted after correction of the problem. You should physically exam your well casing for cracks or seal problems that. can allow contamination by dirt, insects or surface water. To chlorinate your system, pour chlorine directly into your Well casing, circulate chlorinated water up into the house until you smell chlorine at each tap. Let chlorined water sit at least overnieht. Run water until you no longer smell chlorine, before you resample. Contact your local Health Department, Udder Health Systems Laboratory, or a water systems professional for assistance in determining the source of contamination and corrective procedures. This test determines the presence or absence of coliform organisms and addresses only the bacteriological quality of this drinkin_ water sample. There are other substances that can cause the water to be unsafe for human consumption. Additional organic and inorganic tests are needed to determine the chemical suitability of the water. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contact your local Health Department or Udder Health Systems Laboratory 360-398-1360 11525 Knudson Rd. Burlington, WA 98233 (800)755-9295 C A L (360) 757-1400 - FAX (360) 757-1402 Data Report Client Name: Dahlman Pump Reference Number D P.O. Box 422 Report Dat 4/2003 Burlington, WA 98233 SupeFvis Lab Number: 3229 Sample Description: AHG029 - well water Project: Arch Ford Date Sampled: 3/27/2003 Date Received: 3/27/2003 11525 Knudson Burlington, WA 98 98233 ` (800) 755-9295 "17 Y CAL (360) 757-1400 • FAX (360) 757-1402 Page 1 of 1 INORGANIC COMPOUNDS (IOC) REPORT Client Name: Dahlman Pump Reference Number: 03-1737 P.O. Box 422 Burlington, WA 98233 Project: Arch Ford Field ID: AHG029 Sample Description: well water Sampled By: Sample Date: 3/27/2003 Source Type: CAS ANALYTES 7440-38.2 ARSENIC Lab Number: 04603229 Report Date: 4/4/2003 Date Received: 3/27/2003 Supervisor RESULTS UNITS POL MDL MCL Analyst METHOD COMMENT 0.003 mg/L 0.002 0.00003 0.01 mvP 200.8 N T SAL (Stale Reporting Level): Indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH) MCL (7.14xlmum Contaminant Laval) maximum pef<r iWble lever of a contaminant in water established by EPA: Federal Action Levels are 0 015 mgfL for Lead and 1.3 mA for copper. Sodium has a recommended limit of 20 mgrL. A blank MCL Yalu* inGCale a level is net Currently e5laWi5hed. Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water Response level. Systems with compounds defected in excess of this level are required to lake additional Samples. Contact your regional DOH office. NO (Not Detected): indicates that the compound was not detected above the State Reporting Limit (SRL)- NA (Not Analyzed): Indicates that this compound was not analyzed. Comments: FORM: IOC GEN 11525 Knudson Rd. anr,,cc Burlington, WA 98233 (800) 755-9295 A IV A L Y T T CAI (360) 757-1400 - FAX (360) 757-1402 INORGANIC COMPOUNDS (IOC) REPORT Client Name: Dahlman Pump P.O. Box 422 Burlington, WA 98233 System Name: System ID Number: DOH Source Number: Multiple Sources: Sample Type: Sample Purpose: B Sample Location: DO H# ANALYTES EPA Regulated 19 FLUORIDE I _ i I I i I RESULTS UNITS i l 3.5 mglL i i l Reference Number: 03-4098 Project: Arch Ford AHG029 Sample Number: AHG029 Lab Number: 04607625 Collect Date: 7/15/2003 Date Received: 7/15/2003 Report Date: 7/17/2003 • Supervisor:14V SRL i Trigger i 0.10 I MCL 4 EI f I I Analyst I METHOD mvp ; 300.0 ij I I I Ii COMMENT NOTES: SRL (State Reporting Level): Indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level)na.In,um permimV* leycl of a contaminant In water established by EPA; Federal Action Levels are D.015 mglL for Lead and 1.3 mgA. for Copper. Sodium has a recommended IWM of 20 ME blank MCL value indicates a lavei Is not cunonily esla bf shed. Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water Response level. Systems with compounds detected In excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office. ND (Not Detected): Indicates that the compound was not detected above the Specified Reporting Limit (SRL). NA (Not Analyzed): Indicates that this compound was not analyzed. Comments: FORM: IOC ST Please print, sign and return to the Department of Ecology Water Well Report Original & I" copy Ecology, 2" copy owner 3' copy driller Const ructionlD ecom m iss io n ✓ onstruction Decommission ORIGINAL INSTALLATIONNotice of Intent Number W 166091 PROPOSED USE: [21 Domestic © Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ De Water ❑ Irrigation C1 Test Well ❑ Other TYPE OF WORK: Owner's number orweli (if more than one). ❑ Newwell ❑Reconditioned Method:❑ Dug Bored ElDriven ❑ Deepened ❑ Cable B Rotary ❑ Jetted DIMENSIONS: Diameterofwell 6 inches, drilled ft. Depth of completed well 2[13 fl. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Casing Welded 6 Diam. from 0 ft to Installed: Liner installed477T Diam. from '23-RtoIt 88 N. Threaded Diam. from ft. to ft Perforations: El Yes Lj No Type of perforator used Skill Saw SIZE of perfs _jt_in. by in. and no, of perfs 76 from t43 fL to 263 fl. Screens: ❑ Yes ❑✓ No ❑ K-Pac Location Manufacturer's Name Type Model No. Diam. Stag sizc from ft, to ft. Diam. Slot size from ft. to ft. Gravel/Filter packed: ❑ Yes El No ❑ Size of gravel/sand Materials paced from ft. to ft. Surface Seal:: ✓❑ Yes ❑ No To what depth? 18 ft Material used in seal bentonite Did any strata contain unusuable water? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No Type of water? Depth ofstrala Method of sealing strata off PUSIP: Manufacturer's Name Type: H P. WATER LEVELS: Land -surface elevation above mean sea level ft Static level 70 ft. below top ofwell Date /27/03 Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch Date Artesian water is controlled by WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is lowered below static level Was a pump test made? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, by whom? Yield: galJmin. with ft. drawdown after hrs. Yield: galJmin. with ft. drawdown after - his. Yield: galJmin. with ft, drawdown after hrs. Recovery data (time taken as zero when pump turned qffi (water level measured from well top to water level) Time Water Level Time Water Level Time WaterLevcl Date of test Bailer test galJmin. with _ R. drawdown after „hrs Ainest 3 galJmin. with stem set a 266 & for .1 hrs Atesian Flow g p m Date Temperature of water Was a chemical analysis made? ❑ Yes ❑ No Current Notice of Intent No. W 166091 Unique Ecology Well ID Tag No. AHG 029 Water Right Permit No. Property Owner Name Arch Ford Well Street Address 7 mi east of Glacier City County Whatcom Location SWI/4-1/4 SE 1/4 Sec 31 Twn40 Rg EWM ✓ m WWM Lj- Lat/Long (s, t, r Lat Deg Lat Min/Sec Still REQUIRED) Long Deg Long Min/Sec Tax Parcel No. 390806 510510 CONSTRUCTION OR DECOMISSION PROCEDURE Formation: Describe by color, character, size of material and structure, and the kind aad nature of the material in each stratum penetrated, with at least one entry for each change of infomvtion indicate ail water encoluttered. RISE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. MATERIAL I FROM I TO Brown claX 0 4 Brown clay sand & gqvel 4 6 Granite boulder 6 10 Cobbles brown clay & Slavel 10 22 Broken granite eravel cobbles & erav silt 22 71 Black basalt w/la ers of quartz & coal 180 1205 Hard gray basalt 1205 215 Soft black basalt w/some quartz 215 _.._ 266 Water Q..21 Start Date 3/24/03 Completed oats 3/26/03 WELL CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION: I constructed and/or accept responsibility for construction of this well, and its compliance with all Washington well construction standards. Materials used and the information reported above are true to my best knowledge and belief. DrillerfEngineedhainee Name (Print) Ralph RI l _ Drilling Company Dahlman PumQ & Well Drilling. Inc. Driller.'Engineer/Trainee Signature Address ,Rr �-Q 2y, 422 . - $00 2774699 - _ - — -- Dril ler or trainee License No. 2043 - _ City, Stale, zip Burlington, WA 98233 1 r TRAINEE, Contractor's DWer's Licensed No. Registration No. DAHLMPW123LC Date 3/28/03 Diller's Signature Ecology is an Equal Opportunity Employer. ECY 050-1-20 (Rev 2103) 1 I MINOR STRCAM i (LOCATION APPRO%) r i i � x i ri 1 BPI F W rn �.R Y' MINOR STREAM (LOCATION APPROX) a / o w W 0 m / Iu NO j W 0 oor I !W 1 �r I�� F� n �r 1 �f l i r rn € ti Emry 6 fl. -iz LLJ � �o � zz wo o R d Z I ZO i 35 Q¢ G L b cn oW 59 W. W Water Well Reservoir Schematic for Arch Ford Residence 12251 Mt. Baker Highway, Glacier, WA 98244 (Tax Parcel # 390806 510510 0000) The new well, drilled by Dahlman Pump & Well Drilling in March of 2003, is 265 feet deep, has a static level of 70 feet, and has a submersible pump hung on 210 feet of 1" galvanized pipe. An air test performed by Dahlman shows 3 gpm of production. Usable storage for 210 gallons, based on 140 feet of water above the pump and 1.5 gallons per foot of casing. A new 10 x 10 foot well house has been constructed adjacent to the well head and contains the controls for the submersible pump and the utility intertie, meter and circuit breaker. Pursuant to Whatcom County regulations, a single family water well that produces less than 4 gpm must have an additional 400 gallon storage reservoir. Therefore, since this well produces 3 gpm and not 4 gpm, a storage reservoir must be provided. The following diagrams depict two alternative designs for the storage at this site. Alternative A — This alternative makes use of the usable storage in the well, which is a significant 210 gallons due to the depth of the pump. The total storage is 410 gallons (plus the bladder tank in the house), and all connections and tankage are located inside a dry, insulated building. This alternative is most desirable as it makes good use of the building and storage in the well, does not allow possibility of surface water intrusion into the reservoir, provides positive priming of the centrifugal pump, and allows easy visual inspection of all the system components. Well house Pump controls Check valve Static level m 70' Submersible pump Q 210' Well depth = 265' float switches for submersible pump (2) 100 gallon tanks 1 hp o ntrifugal pump switched by remote pressure switch at house Check valve Pressure line to house Water Well Reservoir for Arch Ford Residence Page 2 Alternative B — This alternative is less desirable, but follows the guidelines in a more literal way. Alternative B utilizes a 400 gallon tank buried adjacent to the well house, giving a total capacity 610 gallons, plus the bladder tank in the house. This alternative is less desirable as it does not make good use of the building or credit storage in the well, has greater exposure to surface water intrusion and freezing in the reservoir, and does not allow easy visual inspection of all the system components. WHATCOM COUNTY Planning & Development Services 5280 Northwest Rd., Suite B Bellingham,. WA 98226 360-778-5900 CUSTOMER RECEIPT Receipt: 5201000000000026043 Payor: TACK BLOSS Date: 12/31/2019 Description Amount PLN2020-00004 Docketing App. Fee #8438 405.00 3% Tech Fee #2843 12.15 Total: $ 417.15 Check # CREDIT Paid $ 417.15 JACK BLOSS Confirm Date: 12/31/2019 Confirm No: 68996979 Thank you! Elpda vd 4. F1'l ? • Whatcom County COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360)778-5010 • Agenda Bill Master Report File Number: AB2020-219 File ID: AB2020-219 Version: 1 Status: Reported File Created: 05/13/2020 Entered by: DBrown@co.whatcom.wa.us Department: Council Office File Type: Discussion Assigned to: Council Committee of the Whole Final Action: 10/26/2021 Agenda Date: 10/26/2021 Enactment #: Primary Contact Email: DBrown@co.whatcom.wa.us TITLE FOR AGENDA ITEM: Discussion and update on strategies and other items related to COVID-19 (Council and Health Board) SUMMARY STATEMENT OR LEGAL NOTICE LANGUAGE: Discussion and update on strategies and other items related to COVID-19 (Council and Health Board) HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE FILE Date: Acting Body: Action: 05/19/2020 Council DISCUSSED 06/02/2020 Council DISCUSSED 06/16/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 06/16/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 06/23/2020 Council Special Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED AND MOTION(S) APPROVED 07/07/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 07/21/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 08/05/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 09/15/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 09/29/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 10/13/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 10/27/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 11/10/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 11/24/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED Sent To: Whatcom County Page 1 Printed on 2/13/2025 Agenda Bill Master Report Continued (AB2020-219) 12/08/2020 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 01/12/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 01/26/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 02/09/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 02/23/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 03/09/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 03/23/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 04/06/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 04/20/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 05/04/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 05/18/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 06/01/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 06/15/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 06/29/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 07/13/2021 Council Committee of the Whole DISCUSSED 10/26/2021 Council Committee of the Whole REPORTED Attachments: Presentation, Presentation - Updated 7.7.2020, Presentation 10.13.2020, Vaccine Access Info for 1.26.2021, Letter to Governor - Roadmap to Recovery 2.2.2021, Letter to DOH - Vaccine 2.3.2021, COB Council COVID-19 briefing 6.21.21.pptx, Presentation on 07.13.2021, Agenda Revision for 7.13.2021 Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 2/13/2025 Public Health Advisory Board COVID Employer Support Task Force Update - July 7th 2020 � Whatcom County )ll HEALTH Deaartment Task Force Purpose To help our community's businesses and organizations share, innovate, and improve best practices for safety in the face of COVID-19 now and in the future This is not a regulatory process. This is our community coming together to help each other be safe and feel safe. Qf - Whatcom County HEALTH Department Qf - Task Force. 139 m members WhatcoCounty HEALTH in 18 sectors Qepartment • Agricultural sector • Human service providers • Auto dealerships • Libraries • Children's recreation and • Manufacturing activities • Movie theaters/Museums • Construction • Personal Services - Nail and • Events, Festivals Hair Salons • Faith community • Professional services • Gyms, athletic clubs and • Real estate studios • Retail businesses • Healthcare • Restaurants, bars, and • Hotels and short-term rentals nightclubs Steps 4-7 will happen for different sectors at different speeds; so we will roll these forward in batches "An iterative process" Task Force Action Schedule • Surveys Due 5/13/20 • ALL MEMBERS • Kick-off Wehinar- Survey Results, Task Force Goals and Approach • ALL MEMBERS • Prepare for Peer -to -Peer Sessions • SECTOR LIAISONS • Peer -to -Peer Sessions - Guidance Development • ALL MEMBERS - in sectors • Refine Guidance and Prepare Recommendations to Support Employers • HEALTH DEPARTMENT SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS 4jo• Guidance and Recommendations Review • ALL MEMBERS • Presentation to PHAB, Presentation to Whatcom County Council 9 SECTOR LIAISONS, PHAB We are here Launching the Task Force laid the groundwork in mid -May • Surveyed all Task Force members • Identified Liaisons for each sector • Hosted webinars/trainings • Created a comprehensive Google site to share information • Liaisons reached out to their own professional af Whatcom County HEALTH Department networks to gather input (417 surveys/interviews) Peer -to -Peer Sessions In June,, sector groups began meeting - Sector Liaisons - Members of the Task Force - Health Dept. Subject Matter Expert - PHAB Representative - Facilitator/Notetaker Qf - Whatcom County HEALTH Department 18 Sectors 40 Sector Liaisons 139 Task Force Members What we knew Our conversations and surveys confirmed... • Businesses and organizations needed clear, straightforward guidance that they could understand and rely on. • People needed help navigating challenges in implementation. • We needed to support businesses in responding to different phases of the pandemic. Qf - Whatcom County HEALTH Department What we arm learning • Businesses.want to partner and support each other in creating a culture of health and safety, and economic sustainability. • The Task Force is facilitating an increase in commitment and empowerment. • Task Force members now collaborating with Health Department to host Open Houses, share best practices. Qf - Whatcom County HEALTH Department Qf - What we are creating • Whatcom County HEALTH WHATCOM TOGETHER Qepartment r SAFEIR N STRONGER. Campaign! Ai TOGETHER. * Your health. and safety is our priority. - HEALTH IM whatcomtogether.org NWHATCOMTOGETHER A network of peer support 000 ��; � WEBSITE On-line An Resources: Guidance Sheets, wowl�_ FAQs, tips, templates WHATCOM TOGETHER: Network of Peer Support • Establishing networks for communication to businesses • Sharing tools -Safe Work Plans, policies, staff communications • Hosting Open Houses within business networks • Supporting peers to connect with each other and help each other navigate challenges I n7 Qf - Whatcom County HEALTH Department i WHATCOM TOGETHER: WhQf atcam County HEALTH On-line resources Department • "Whatcom Together" Toolkit Guidance Sheets Tips and Tools Campaign signage • WCHD webpage informed by the needs of customers for information and resources WHATCOM TOGETHER: Safer. Stronger. Together. Campaign SAFER. STRONGER. TOGF9N ER. Your health and safety is ourpriority. HEALTH whatcomtogether.org ❑eaaF'm #WHATCOMTOGETHER In coordination with the Port, Chambers, Downtown Business Associations, Cities MASKS REQUIRED HERE A stay six wear a feet apart mask J� 000 ° respect stay maximum home jl� occupancy if sick Qf - Whatcom County HEALTH Department What's Next-,lp Updates and Presentations to Task Force, PHA6, County Council, and other partners will continue. Whatcom Together Forums — Webinars with Task Force Members sharing tips. Sessions will be recorded and can be accessed through the Whatcomtogether.org website. ASKS REQUIRED HERE i�r:�rn ® whahomloge[her.urg wwnnra. FIRST FORUM 7/9 or 7/10 • Campaign Launch! • How to talk about masks Lwith your customers SAFER. STRONGER. TOGETHER. Your health and safety is our priority. 1A yll� HEALTH IM whatcomtogether.org af Whatcom County HEALTH Department you! PfIL Any Questions.? Whatcom County HEALTH Department Here is how you can help: • Attend Whatcom I ogether Forums • Share the Campaign materials Public Health Advisory Board COVID Employer Support Task Force Update to the Council Committee of the Whole July 7th 2020 � Whatcom County )ll HEALTH Deaartment Task Force Purt)ose To help our community's businesses and organizations share, innovate, and improve best practices for safety in the face of COVID-19 now and in the future This is not a regulatory process. This is our community coming together to help each other be safe and feel safe. ij*�N Whatcom County HEALTH Department f4l� Task Forces, m members WhatcoCounty HEALTH in 18 sectors Department • Agricultural sector • Human service providers • Auto dealerships • Libraries • Children's recreation and • Manufacturing activities • Movie theaters/Museums • Construction • Personal Services - Nail and • Events, Festivals Hair Salons • Faith community • Professional services • Gyms, athletic clubs and • Real estate studios • Retail businesses • Healthcare • Restaurants, bars, and • Hotels and short-term rentals nightclubs ";4n iterative process" Task Force Action Schedule • Surveys Due 5/13/20 • ALL MEMBERS • Kick-off Wehinar- Survey Results, Task Force Goals and Approach • ALL MEMBERS hol ",C-- • Prepare for Peer -to -Peer Sessions • SECTOR LIAISONS Steps 4-7 will happen for different • Peer -to -Peer Sessions - Guidance Development • ALL MEMBERS - in sectors sectors at I different — speeds; so we • Refine Guidance and Prepare Recommendations to Support Employers will roll these • HEALTH DEPARTMENT SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS forward in batches • Guidance and Recommendations Review • ALL MEMBERS • Presentation to PHAB, Presentation to Whatcom County Council • SECTOR LIAISONS, PHAB We are here Launching the Task Force Laid the groundwork in mid -May • Surveyed all Task Force members • Identified Liaisons for each sector • Hosted webinars/trainings • Created a comprehensive Google site to share information • Liaisons reached out to their own professional Whatcom County HEALTH Department networks to gather input (417 surveys/interviews) °eer-to-Peer Sessions In June,, sector groups began meeting - Sector Liaisons - Members of the Task Force - Health Dept. Subject Matter Expert - PHAB Representative - Facilitator/Notetaker IL_ ij*�N Whatcom County HEALTH Department 18 Sectors 40 Sector Liaisons 139 Task Force Members What we knew Our conversations and surveys confirmed... • Businesses and organizations needed clear, straightforward guidance that they could understand and rely on. • People needed help navigating challenges in implementation. • We needed to support businesses in responding to different phases of the pandemic. fji"L Whatcom County HEALTH Department What we are learning • Businesses.want to partner and support each other in creating a culture of health and safety, and economic sustainability. • The Task Force is facilitating an increase in commitment and empowerment. • Task Force members now collaborating with Health Department to host Open Houses, share best practices. 4j'�i� Whatcom County HEALTH Department What we are creating: HE�H WHATCOM TOGETHER Department n r 0 SAFER a STRONGER. TOGETHER. Your health and safety is aurpriority. ` . ii aLT whatcamtogethecorg A network of peer support Campaign! MMU-MORMN-1 On-line Resources: Guidance Sheets, FAQs, tips, templates WHATCOM TOGETHER: Network of Peer Support • Establishing networks for communication to businesses • Sharing tools -Safe Work Plans, policies, staff communications • Hosting Open Houses within business networks • Supporting peers to connect with each other and help each other navigate challenges ij*�N Whatcom County HEALTH Department WHATCOM TOGETHER: What�unty HEALTH On-line resources Department New WCHD webpage informed by the needs of customers for information and resources ._:.. • Essential Guidance and Templates • Recommended Tips and Tools • FAQs • Link to Campaign Materials Home > Your Gavernment r Departments ) Health Department > CommunicatAe Disease r Tapics ) Navel Coronavirus {COVIl-19) Individuals, Families &. Resources for Businesses & Organizations Households Healthcare Providers Resources for Businesses and Community Organizations Resources for Businesses & Organizations Last updated .lucre 30, 2020 of 4:30 pm Masks and Face Coverings On May 1, Governor Inslee outlined his phased "Safe Starr approach for resuming recreational, social, and business activities. To support the business community in their reopening efforts, a Whatcorn County COVID Employer Support COVID-19 Testing Task Force was established. Media & Press The Task Faroe works within the framework of Washington's Safe Start approach for reopening businesses and develops a set of best practices and guidelines for ensuring businesses have measures in place to protect their employees, customers, and clients from the risk of infection with COVID-19. We're all in this together and we're here to support you Fact Sheets b rovidin you with the most u -to-date uidance and resources to help in our plan efforts. YP 9Y P g P� Y p g hatcom County Health Officer Orders Resources for All Businesses and Community Organizations A lot of information exists to help businesses reopen, so we've created a single place to connect you to the best FAQs resources we've found to guide you through reopening. COVID Employer The information below is applicable to all types of businesses, with information for specific businesses listed further Support Task Force down. This webpage is updated frequently. Check back soon for more tips and tools from the CC1lID Employer Support Task Force. Safe Start Phase 2 Tips and Tools for Implementing COVID-19 Guidance PIL hatcom County HE LTH Department All businesses and organizations have a general obligation to keep a safe and healthy facility in accordance with state and federal law, and comply with COVID-19 work site -specific safety practices as outlined in Governor Jay Inslee's O ID-19 Reopen inq Guidance for Businesses and Workers, and the Washington Mate Department of Health Workplace and Employer Resources & Recommendations. When Whatcem County enters Phase 3, ALL businesses will be required to have a "Safe Work Plan", aka a "Safe Start Plan". This template can help you create your plan - or ensure that your existing plan meets the current guidelines. Figuring out hour to implement the State guidance within your own business or organization can be challenging. In May of 2020, the 140 member Whatcom Countp's C OV I D Employer Support Task Force worked to try and simplify} the basic concepts and share tips and tools as widely as possible. This document will be updatedlas now information emerges. The most current version is available on the Whatcorr, County Health Department website, along with other useful materials. Guidance Suggestions for Implementation Adopt a written health and • Fill in the Washington State Phase 3 Safe Start Plan Template. safety plan Designate one DO ID • It is best if there is one person who has responsibility for monitoring implementation of monitor guidance, updating the plan, maintaining supplies, screening employees, and communicating with employees. • Have a single point of contact for the Health Dept. to reach your business for contact tracing of staff, volunteers, or ciientsicustomers. Whoever is in charge of HR is usually the best person to assign to this role. Display visible signage • Post visible signage at all entry points and throughout the workplace for both customers and staff. Signage should state shared expectations (e.g. masks and distancing) and responsibilities (including proper hygiiene & sanitization, and information for reporting concerns). See samples from WhatcomTo edwr,or , CDC, and Governor Inslee. Reduce risk for people more Vulnerable Employees & Volunteers WHATCOM TOGETHER: Safer. Stronger. Together. Campaign SAFER. STRONGER. TOGETHER. Your health and sgfety is our priority. HEALTH what(omtogether.org department #WMATCOMTOGETMER In coordination with the Port, Chambers, Downtown Business Associations, Cities MASKS REQUIRED HERE MeFT = qwkwoowmv .w„..�o.,oa.rk.� @I TI wear a feet apart mask Ci 0000 respect slay maximum home occupancy if sick fjilL Whatcom County HEALTH Department r LA whatcomtogether.org kWMATCOMTOGETXER SAFER. STRONGER. � T OCIPT&r , Your health and safety is our priorit . fe Whatcom County HEALTH Department RESOURCES rSAFEF STRONGEI TOGETNEI rr Essential Safe Start Resources for Businesses and Community Organizations have been developed for you by the 1 hatcom County Health Department to keep your business safe! Access this Important Information here. -qqommww- MEMi Download These files are available to use on your business or website. Downloads These files are available to use on your business or website. AR. HGER. :THER. urheaI#h ! 19) whatconrr 4 olw$/ MASKS REQUIRED FIERE -1 MASKS ARS AVAILX' large poster sizE: 17 in. x 11 in. RILE FORMAT: PDF You can place these wherever they will be most visible and helpful. mask required here - free masks available poster SIZE: 5.5 in. x 8.5 in. FILE FORMAT: PDF This helps reinforce the state requirements and lets customers know a free mask i available if they don't have one. CONTACT rSAFEI STRON E L THE Drop us a line! Have a question or comment? Contact us by completing the form below. FULL NAME* ❑o BUSINESS OR ORGANIZATION What's Next.? Updates and Presentations to Task Force, PHAB, County Council, and other partners will continue. Whatcom Together Forums — Webinars with Task Force Members and Project Partners sharing tips. Sessions will be recorded and can be accessed through the Whatcomtogether.org website. fji� Whatcom County HEALTH Department First Forum coming up on Friday, July 10th at 11 am SAFER. "Let's Talk About Masks" JULY 10, 11am-12pm STRONGERN What do we say when a customer is upset? How can we set our employees up for TO ETHERS success? Join us for a conversation about how This is the first in a series of virtual community forums created to support businesses and organizations in Whatcom County. Together, we can share resources and ideas to keep our community healthy while we build consumer confidence and reopen our economy. Whatcom County 641,21% HEALTH tkL A&,&j Department L LjfL to talk about masks in our businesses. ZOOM MEETING ID: 884 6344 2777 This event is brought to you by the Whatcom County Health Dept. and the COVID Employer Support Task Force (ESTF). The ESTF has 140 members from businesses and organizations representing diverse sectors of the local economy. For more information about the "Safer. Stronger. Together." campaign, please visit WHATCOMTOGETHER.ORG thank you ! Any Questions.? � Whatcom County HEALTH Debartment Here is how you can help: • Attend Whatcom Together Forums • Share the Campaign materials DOH CARES Act $4.5 M Spending Plan DRAFT $4,500,000 March - Dec 30 2020 Item Cost Cost Summary Public Health $2,407,440 Health Department Salaries/Benefits for Staff working on Covid $1,550,000 Extra Help Health Dept Temp Staff Salaries/Benefits for Staff working on COVID $10,000 WUC Salaries/Benefits (Nov/Dec) $20,000 IT $50,000 Mass Vaccination Supplies & Equip $20,000 Contractual -Social marketing campaign $215,000 PPE $100,000 Isolation and Quarantine facility cost $170,000 Not yet allocated $272,440 Schools $1,182,560 Bellingham School District $499,185 Mt Baker School District $94,325 Lynden School district $146,025 Blaine School District $94,905 Nooksack Valley School District $82,755 Meridian School District $79,560 Ferndale School District $185,805 Community $350,000 Behavioral Health Services / Human Services $350,000 Economic and Business Response $560,000 Whatcom Business Alliance $10,000 Downtown Bellingham Partnership $56,033 Sustainable Connections $147,467 Bellingham Regional Chamber of Commerce $198,000 Bellingam Whatcom Tourism $106,500 Recreation NW $21,000 TAG $21,000 Total j $4,500,000 $4,500,000 C:\Users\chalka\Desktop\CARES 4.5 M Plan 10-12-20 for Council.xlsx Page 1 Whatcom County Health Board Councilmember Browne January 26, 2021 Discussion regarding public having access to the COVID-19 Vaccine The distribution of the COVID vaccine is dependent on several factors, some of which are within our control and some are not. 1. Production of vaccine. - Pharmaceutical companies - Outside our control 2. Allocation to WA State - Federal Policy - Outside our control 3. Allocation within population - State DOH - Outside our control 4. Publish allocation rules - State DOH - State controls 5. Decide Vaccine providers - State DOH - State controls 6. Vaccine delivery - County & Other providers - County & Others 7. Vaccine request process - Providers/County - County & Others There are two items we can control. There is one we should delegate as much as possible but have to monitor (6). One we can and should control (7) 4. The State decides and the county already publishes the Allocation rules, so this covered https://www.co.whatcom.wa.us/3530/COVID-1 9-Vaccine-Information#wherefind 5. The State decides and the county already publishes the list of designated providers https://www.doh.wa.gov/YouandYourFamily/Immunization/VaccineLocations 6. The State currently only lists 5 providers in the County. Although there are more than actually listed. So the County has to ensure the State DOH maintains this list or we have to provide our own. 7. The primary community pain point at the moment in the County is that residents who qualify are confused about where to go to get vaccines. The County is currently advising citizens not to call the County or local providers because both are overwhelmed by the number of inquiries. Many residents of Whatcom are now going to (and receiving service) in adjacent counties. We respect and understand that the County Health Department is tired and overworked. We should do everything we can to reduce their workload. But County Government still needs to provide residents with a centralized portal where they can go an register interest in receiving a vaccine and get automated updates. Providing a portal is an IT project, not a Health Department responsibility. The County IT department (or a third party IT consultant) should be tasked with finding an existing software portal provider (similar to the TestDirectly product used to schedule COVID tests) that can allow residents to do the following: A. Log their name and contact details B. Provide their insurance details C. Use a decision tree to determine and advise which vaccination group they fall into and give them an approximate indication as to when their group is eligible to be vaccinated D. Allow them to return periodically or receive weekly emails to update them of their place in line E. Provide a drop down list of local providers who can do COVID vaccinations F. Allow them to choose their preferred provider/location G. Notify that provider of the residents interest H. Allow the provider to advise the resident when they should have a shot available to them. CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Dana Brown -Davis, C.M.C. COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Suite #1o5 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360)778-5010 WHATCOM COUNTY HEALTH BOARD February 2, 2021 Governor Jay Inslee Office of the Governor PO Box 40002 Olympia, WA 98504 Governor Inslee, COUNCILMEMBERS Rud Browne Barry Buchanan Tyler Byrd Todd Donovan Ben Elenbaas CarolFrazey Kathy Kershner We represent Whatcom County and wish to express our frustration and deep concern about the Roadmap to Recovery plan. Whatcom County businesses and residents have been suspended in limbo since early June when our application to move to Phase 2 was approved. Since then, with the exception of a spike in cases in January, Whatcom County has not experienced high case rates and our hospital has successfully managed the medical needs of COVID-19 patients. We learned of the changes to the Roadmap to Recovery the day they were released, without being given any opportunity to weigh in, share our experience as local elected officials, or share concerns or unintended consequences. These changes are perplexing and create whiplash for our businesses and residents. We have been patient, followed the requirements, and asked businesses to do the same. Seeing that the new strategy clearly benefits counties inequitably, it is frustrating and difficult to justify to our struggling businesses and residents. We now witness counties with far higher case rates being granted the ability to re -open while our North region's averages are much lower and our businesses continue to suffer in lockdown. How is it fair or equitable that San Juan County, with a two -week case rate of 64/100,000 has businesses shuttered, but King County, with a two -week case rate of 300/100,000 (six times higher disease burden) is re -opening? There is no margin of error for our smaller counties; a single case increase could sink the entire region for two weeks, given the emphasis on decreased rates rather than disease burden. The new metrics cannot be justified with science, risk, or equity. We insist on a re -opening strategy that considers case rates, not just decreases, that doesn't artificially tie diverse counties into a failed regional approach, and that moves more quickly to safely re -open businesses. The anticipated holiday surges have passed. It's time to let counties with low case rates join in the Phase 2 reopening. Sincerely, Barry Buchanan, Chair Whatcom County Health Board C: Whatcom County Health Director Erika Lautenbach Whatcom County Councilmembers Whatcom County Executive Satpal Sidhu AB2020-219 CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Dana Brown -Davis, C.M.C. COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Suite #105 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360)778-5010 February 2, 2021 Cpp ti; COUNCILMEMBERS ASP Rud Browne Barry Buchanan Tyler Byrd Todd Donovan ASNirE��p Ben Elenbaas Carol Frazey Kathy Kershner WHATCOM COUNTY HEALTH BOARD Secretary Dr. Umair Shah Washington State Department of Health 101 Israel Rd Tumwater, WA 98504 Secretary Shah, We recognize that vaccine shortages nationwide are creating frustration and confusion among those eligible to receive the vaccine. This is a challenge experienced by every jurisdiction in our country. We are concerned, however, about the lack of transparency regarding the distribution of vaccine to Whatcom County and throughout Washington State. More specifically: 1. Allocation of vaccine from county to county is not clearly defined or seemingly based on population, number eligible or other reasonable metrics. This week, Whatcom County enrolled providers requested (by our best estimate) more than 8,000 doses and received 700 first doses of Moderna and zero first doses of Pfizer. Island County, with a population just 37% of Whatcom County's, received 700 first doses of Moderna and 975 first doses of Pfizer. We don't share this with the intention to compete for limited resources with our neighbors, but there is no clarity in why that decision was made. 2. Whatcom County has vaccinated just over 25% of individuals eligible due to vaccine supply. With increased focus from the state, via state -run vaccine clinics, to 'catch up' some counties, why are counties that have vaccinated nearly all eligible still receiving more vaccine than those counties that are 'behind'? 3. Whatcom County learned this week that of the 34 enrolled providers, only pharmacies would receive vaccine. This was confusing and frustrating for clinics and healthcare providers that have created expanded capacity, added staff, and communicated with their eligible patients. How is DOH making decisions about which enrolled providers receive vaccine and what quantity of vaccine they receive? We know that allocation is not commensurate with requests, but don't have details or transparency around how these decisions are made. 4. Providers report dramatic inconsistencies from one week to the next in their vaccine allocation. One large provider reported receiving nearly 1,000 one week, requiring overtime and additional clinics to meet the 95% requirement set by the Governor, and then receiving zero doses the following week. This inconsistency makes planning, scheduling appointments, and staffing extremely challenging. Our providers in Whatcom County have embraced our community goal of vaccinating everyone who wants a vaccine. We ask, on their behalf as well as on behalf of our confused and frustrated consituents, to provide more transparency and rationale behind decision - making. We ask that this be provided publicly, on the DOH website, and to our providers each week when sharing their allocation. As elected officials we are doing our best to encourage our constituents to support our recommendations, but our ability to do that is dependent on our ability to demonstrate transparency and logic behind State Health Department policies and procedures. Please help us, to help you. Sincerely, Barry Buchanan, Chair Whatcom County Health Board C: County Executive Satpal Sidhu Health Department Director Erika Lautenbach Councilmembers AB2020-219 COVID-19 Update Greg Stern MD Whatcom County Health Officer Erika Lautenbach MPH Director, Whatcom County Health Department June 21, 2021 Bellingham City Council Meeting Whatcom County HEALTH Department COVIDm19 Case Trends Overview of COVID-19 trends • Case rates are down from peaks in November 2020, post -holiday January 2021 surge, and April -May 2021 surge. • Case rates vary by county sub -area, all are decreasing. • Concern re: susceptible people as more transmissible variants spread, as weather cools this fall and winter, more indoor exposure to cold, dry air. b COVID-19 DISEASE ACTIVITY Data as of June 17, 2021 11:59PM PT Select a key metric New hospitalizations per 1001G people Elfecfive reproductWe number 9R1 Select a County All v .75 or more - 50 to c75 .25 to a 50 � 10 to 425 -0 to 410 - zero cases COVID-19 disease activity Learn Rate of newly diagnosed confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases More This graph shows the trend of the rate cif newly diagnosed confirmed and probable CDVID-1 p cases per 100,000 people during a two week period. The most recent period is tram May 29 through Jury 10. The department of Health defines low disease activity as having � fewer than 25 cases per 100,000 people during the prior two weeks. Whatcom County Rate per 100K of newly diagnosed confirmed and probable cases during the prior two weeks 7 Day 14 l ay Case rate ❑ Latest case rate --- Case rate incomplete --- Goal � 2 5 €ase rate 600 V T Le Rate per 100K of newly 12 5A diagnosed confirmed and probable cases during the prior two weeks 400 Meeting goal of fewer than No 25 cases icanfirmed and probablel per 100,000 people 200 Supporting detail Population 228,000 Confirmed and probable 286 0 cases in the prior two weeks Apr 2020 Jut 2020 Cct 2020 Jan 2021 Apr 2021 Specimen Collection Date Sources: Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Office of Financial Management swerBI pages ® IF M Phase and RiskCOVID-19 disease Assessment Activity COVID-19 DISEASE ACTIVITY Data as of June 17. 2021 1 1:59PM PT Select a key metric COVID-19 disease activity Rate per 100K newly Rate of newly hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the past week diagnosed cases This graph shows the trend of the rate of newly hospitalized COO- patients per 100.000 people during the past week_ Effective reproductive number sR) Select a County Whatcorn .� Power B1 Hospilalizations amo-ng confirmed and probable cases are inctuded-Themost recent period is from Jun 1 through Jun 07. Whatcom County Pate of newly hospitalized COVID-19 patients per 100K people Hospitalization rate —* Latest rate Hospitalization (incomplete data) Pate of newly hospitalized 8.3 COVID-19 patients per 10OK people during the past week 10 5 Population 228.000 Newly hospitalized 19 COVID-19 patients 0 during the pas[ week Apr 2021; Jul 2024 Oct 2020 Jan 2021 Hospital Admit Date Sources: Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Office of Financial Management Pages Apr 2021 Learn More V ® V M Case Rates: Whatcom County Sub -County Areas @ ew confirmed COVIG-19 cases per 100,000 people during the prior two weeks 7'EJ- 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Apr 2021 May 2021 Jun 2021 Specimen Collection Date Data for the past 14 days is considered preliminary and may change due to data reconciliation. Sub -county areas are defined by school district boundaries. back — CaseRatesSubC.,. v [ } Ft Power BI [ 2of7 > *Bellingham *Blaine • Ferndale • Lynden • Meridian *Mount Baker • Nooksack Malley Microsoft Power BI ( 2 of 7 ) Lol `` r Vaccination Coverage Where and when are vaccinations being given? Who is getting vaccinated? Va cci nations People Fully Vaccinated COVID-19 IN WASHINGTON STATE People Initiating Vaccination (Receiving at least 1 dose) DATA AS Of 6116l2021 PT This chart shows the number of people in Washington initiating vaccination (receiving at least 1 dose), People initiating vaccination represent the total number of people who have received at least one dose of any type of COVID-19 vaccine. Individuals who are fully vaccinated are included in the count of both People Initiating Vaccination and People Fully Vaccinated. Please note, the measures "vaccin given" and "people vaccinated" are not comparable. Vaccines given counts number of doses given in a location. People vaccinated counts number of Washington residents initiating vaccination and SELECT COUNTY A search F. Pend Oreille County _. Pierce County . San Juan County �_. Skagit County Skamania County _. Snohomish County .Spokane County Stevens County Thurston County Wahkiakum County . Walla Walla County ■ Whatcom County Whitman County _. Yakima County Tabular Vier+1 I ;a back soft Power BI Percent of Total Population Initiating Vaccination Percent of Total Population Fully Vaccinated Percent of Population Initiating Vaccination (16+) Percent of Population Fully Vaccinated (16+) Percent of Population Initiating Vaccination (12+) Percent of Population Fully Vaccinated (12+) r Ml l+y1 51.6% 68.1% fi1.196 66.5% 59.2% TOTAL POPULATION INITIATING VACCINATION (RECEIVING AT LEAST 1 DOSE) Legend ' 60%+ > 45% to 60% 1 >30% to 45% ' >15%to 30% R >0%to 15% a Zero County data for people initiating vaccination are based on the vaccine recipient's county of residence. people initiating I vaccination do not have a county reported. For 353 people who initiated vaccination, we are unable to determine whether all CaurityAeveNnfarmgu otr can be found on Loco! Heo(th Jurisdiction (LL0) websites Pages +; 1 hatcom County: Percent of Age Group Vaccinated for COVID-19 *Vaccination Initiated •Vaccination Data Source: WAState Dept_ of Health Most recent data update 6112Q1 _ Data Visual: WCHD HA Division. 0.0 % 0.0 % AgeGO-11 <- Go back = ByAgeColum-.s 36.4% 19.4 % Age12-1 5 E. PAIV.1 Age16-17 51.4% Agel8-24 Microsoft Power BI ( 6 of 7 72.1 % 62.8% Age25-49 65.4% 58.7% 77.9% 72.4°,'o Age5O-64 Age65+ 1 hatcom County: Percent of Population who have Initiated COVID-19 Vaccination by Sub -County Area 8 J%Blai 56. Ferndale Data Source: WA State Dept. of Health Most recent data refresh 6112}21. Data Visual: WCHD HIA Division. �— Go back _ Map Lynden Nooksack Valley 4 .5% 7.4% Meridian/ 5 .1% 5 .7% ALA Bellingham 6 . % v < > V T Mount Baker Microsoft Power BI ( 7 of 7 L4 �� SARSmCoVm2 Variants Variant overview • Proportion of cases due to specific variants changes over time as more transmissible variants spread and become the dominant strains. • Alpha (B.I.1.7) was dominant strain after original strains, 50% more transmissible. • Gamma (P.1) and Delta (B.1.617.2) even more transmissible than Alpha, anticipate Delta being dominant strain by late summer, early fall. Different timelines by region. Washington State follows the Center for disease Control and Prevention's variants of Concern. These include: Cumulative Earliest Most recent Name ,area of CDC Washington specimen specimen emergence designation cases collection collection detected date date B.1.1.7 United Variant of 5,629 20 1-01-07 0 1-065-03 Kingdom concern B.1.351 South Africa Variant of 147 2021-01-29 2021-05.24 concern P.1 Brazil Variant of 1.133 2021-02-06 2021-065-02 concern B.1.427 California Variant of 361 2020-12-11 2021-05-20 concern B.1.429 California Variant of 2.750 2020-11-20 2021-065-01 concern B.1_526* New York Variant of 345 20 1-01-21 2021-065-02 interest B.1.525 New York Variant of 66 20 1-62-05 0 1-05-13 interest P_2 Brazil Variant of 37 2021-01-28 0 1-04-20 interest Variant of B_1 _ra17" India interest 206 2021-03-22 2021-06-0 *Includes B.1.526 and B_1.526.1 * *includes B-1_617, B.1.617.1, B-1.617.2, and B.1.617.1 ■ 5equenring can he performed on stared specimens at any time, so the earliest roIlection date may change as additional specimens are sequenced. Pierce 442 12 68 18 309 23 2 2 4 San Juan 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c �O°mry 0.1.1] count B.1.351 count PA count B.1.427 count BA.429 count B.1.5M count B.1.525 count P.2 count B.1.617' 'count Skagit 112 0 9 1 12 0 0 0 0 Skamania 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Snolo mish 821 15 114 31 2% 26 4 1 12 Suriname v 1 % 4 36 6 1 0 1 Stevens 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1rhummn 81 4 5 4 24 2 0 0 0 Walla Walla 3 0 3 ] 4 1 0 0 0 Whatcum 254 1 91 5 21 8 2 0 0 Whitman 40 0 1 6 6 1 0 0 0 Yakima 1$ 11 33 92 M 12 1 8 10 Ilse the controls to focus an a ;specific region anchor 2-week interval HHS Regi# Navicas#Ors on Two Fweeks ending USA 6•F -_D21 { Now�ast. off United States: 212812021 — 61512021 United States; 512312021 — 61512021 NOWCAST J $l?9(1 SM 40% a.I.i.s19 �LiL7 USA Lineage Type %Total 959i6p1 Most B.:L.L7 VOC 65,5% 60-4-70.6% ■ common IIneages P.1 6.1.617.2 VOC VOC 11.6% 9-9% 6.6-13.5% ■ ■ B,1, 526 VOI 4.0% 2.1-6, 3% ■ B.1.526.2 1.9% 0.6-3.6% 0.1.526.1 Vol 118% 0.6-3.3% ■ 13,1 0,4% 0,0`1.2% ■ 6.2.1.519 0.4% 0_0-1.2% ■ B.2.2 0.1% 0.0`0.3% ■ Additional 131.351 VOC 0,5% 0.0-1,5% ■ V01jY0C B.1.479 VOC 0.3% 0.0-0.9% ■ Ilneages # 8.1.617.1 Vol 0.2% 0.".6% ■ B.I.427 VOC 0.1% 0.0-0,6% ■ B.I.525 Vol 0.1% C.0`0,6% ■ 3D% P.2 Vol 0.0% ODA3% ■ --Other* Other 3.2% C.".3% ■ r 2D i SJ'}L h.1.52fi e.1.525 B,1.S2G t3.1-526 6.1.525 B.1,S E 526 Other represents }ZM abdetlonar lineages_ which arc cacti c1mulaung at -;I% 01 4uU5@S Them dale r'ttlu#e #,lowcast eaLmates, which we madoGed prawlrans that 3{13{21 3:`27 21- 4na/z1 11+241 Z. 5 R$ 21 5122121 615/21. may drRer from wrepghted esumaws genemled at laler dates k SuMnaages a#P.1 Arnd$.1.351 �P.1.1, P.1.2. 5.7_$51 , 0.1_41.3Iare aggregated weth the parent linleage and Included in parent lineage's proponjon_ Callecki�n date, t��a,FreekS e7v7� United States: 1 3/2021 - 615f2021 NOWCAST Use the corl W Ingrus on a spool rem O Tend seeks enana O R ououuOff HHB Region 1031281-6151ZD21—(�5402t NOWCfST mi an Alaska Islas Oregon ani lineage Type %Tcmi di door MMM de man mines Wascal nwwAngeles kingdom .wnvnam cash ansolani 9'<'MN� 59h1 g4gi iddi On Yl w amain Vol Pat men dean United States: 5123/2021—6/512021 NOWCAST 10 ;+a bl a au Regional poponions ton specimens collected the two weeks enmng 6152021. US Tectonics not slwwn are included in HHS regions: PR,A-Region2 PS, iM, GU, MH, MP, PVJ-Region g Updatedlune IS, 2021 4 n `Fiff COVID-19 Treatment and Prevention • Clinical guidance provided by WCHD guidelines, primarily those from NIH, medical specialty societies. is based on consensus CDC, and national • The guidelines are based on a thorough and ongoing critical review of the results, study methods, and analyses used in relevant studies. • Speculative or promising treatments need to be evaluated for safety and efficacy before they are disseminated by public health. • Expert panels, like the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the FDA Advisory Boards, and the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel, provide that evaluation of the evidence. Vaccines - from Research to Approval FDA — Data monitoring and safety board must approve application for clinical trials • Phase 1 trial - safety of the vaccine candidate. Escalating doses given to healthy volunteers to determine side effects and tolerability. • Phase 2 trial - expands recruitment and may include participants with health conditions such as obesity, cancer, and diabetes. Active recruitment for participants of various demographics. Continued testing of the safety of the vaccine and its initial efficacy and how it affects the immune system. • Phase 3 trial - recruit thousands of participants to measure the efficacy of the vaccine in preventing disease. • Manufacturers submit their data with applications for EUA or licensing. Reviewed by FDA teams and by independent advisory board (VRBPAC) • Key to rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines was multiple vaccine platforms, previous development of vaccines for SARS-CoV-1. MERS, and others, and gene sequencing and sharing of genome within weeks of initial isolation of SAR-CoV-2 • Simultaneous Phase 2 and 3 trials, with public funding of trials allowed for compression of timeline with maintenance of safety review. • VAERS, v-safe, Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) for post - authorization safety surveillance COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy • Although response of variants to vaccines vary, all provide significant protection against current VOC, markedly reduce risk of severe disease/hospitalization/death, and reduce transmission. • New info on Delta variant response to vaccines show little efficacy from first dose mRNA vaccine, need full series to have significant protection. • FDA and CDC reviewing rare cardiac inflammation events following mRNA vaccine, clotting events following adenovirus vector vaccines. Vaccine safety system is identifying issues and investigating. • Risk of cardiac inflammation is higher and more severe with COVID-19 infection than from vaccine. AAP, ACC, CDC strongly recommend vaccination. Summary • Virus is suppressed, not eliminated. We are all safer when transmission is less. • Those without prior immunity are susceptible. • Vaccine is safest and most effective protection. • Those at risk should continue to mask, distance, avoid gatherings with unvaccinated. • Current status is good and improving. Concern remains for variants that are more transmissible, more virulent, and less responsive to neutralizing antibodies (from vaccine or prior infection) References/Data Sources • https://www.whatcomcounty.us/3427/COVID-19-Data • https://coronavirus.wa.g v/what-you-need-know/roadmap-recovery- metrics • https://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/l/Documents/1600/coronavirus/data- tables/420-316-SequencingAndVariantsReport.pdf • https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions • https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant- info.html#Concern • https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety.html • https://www.covidl9treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/about-the-guidelines/ Vaccine Safety • FDA COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Updates, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), June 10, 2021 https://www.fda.gov/media/150054/download • CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting 6/23/21 will provide update on mRNA vaccines and cardiac inflammation and discuss COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in adolescents and young adults: benefit -risk discussion https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/ale nda-archive/agenda-2021-06-23-508.pdf • CDC Vaccine Safety Programs • https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/index.html COVID-19 Update • Greg Stern MD Whatcom County Health Officer July 13, 2021 Whatcom County Council, Committee of the Whole meeting Whatcom County HEALTH Department Overview • Case rates and vaccination progress • Variants, with focus on Delta • What we know about immunity, both through natural infection and vaccination Good News and Concerns Case rates are very low (near lowest in past year) Vaccination rates are relatively high in county overall, especially among 65+ Vaccines provide strong protection from severe disease for all VOC Sub -area and age differences in vaccination rates Vaccination rates have plateaued and no vaccine yet for those under 12y Case and Hospitalization Rates *,� COVID-19 DISEASE ACT lTY Data as of July 11. 2021 11:59PM PT Select a key metric COVID-19 disease activity Learn Rate per I OOK newly Rate of newly diagnosed confirmed and probable CDVID-19 cases More diagnosedThis graph shows the trend of the rate of newly diagnosed confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people during a two week period. The most recent period is from Jun 21 through Jul 04_ the Department of Health defines low disease activity as having New hospitalizations fewer than 25 cases per 100,000 people during the prior two weeks_ per 100K people hatcom County Rate per 1 OOK of newly diagnosed confirmed and probable cases during the prior two weeks Effective reproductive numberlRl 7 flay co 14 Coy — Case rate ❑ Latest case rate =-- Case rate incomplete --- Goal {25 case rate 600 Select a County All .75 or more 50 to f75 . 25 to f 50 � 10 to 425 � to to a 10 - Zero cases v Rate per 10OK of newly 45. diagnosed confirmed and probable cases during the prier two weeks 400 Meeting goal of fewer than No 25 cases (confirmed and probable) per 100,000 people 200 Supporting detail Population 228,000 Confirmed and probable 103 cases in the prior two 0 weeks Apr 2020 Jut 2020 Oct 2020 Jan 2021 Apr 2021 Jul 2021 Specimen Collection fate Sources: Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Office of Financial Management Go back = `•' A11 Case Rates: Whatcorn County Sub -County Areas New confirmed COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people during the prior two weeks 1, DOo 1.000 500 0T Jan 2021 Feb 2021 Mar 2021 Atipr 0 1 May 2021 Jun 2021 Jul 2021 Specimen Collection Date Data for the past 14 days is considered preliminary and may change due to data reconciiion. Sub -county areas are defined by school district boundaries. • Bel lingham • Blaine Ferndale • Lynden • Meridian I Blount Baker • f ooksack Valle Go back = CaseRaIGSSUK... < > 2 Hospitalization Rates: Whatcorn County Sub -County Areas Confirmed COVID-19 hospitalizations per 100,000 people during the prior two creeks 80 0 40 0 C Jan 2021 Feb 2021 Mar 2021 Apr 2021 May 2021 Jun 2021 Jul 2021 Specimen Collection Date Data for the past 14 days is considered preliminary and may change due to data reconciliation. Sub -county areas are defined by school district boundaries. • Bellingham • Blaine Ferndale • Lynden • Meridian -Mount Baker • Nooksack Malley Go back = HaspRatesSubC... < > 72 Variants L United States: 312812021 — 71312021 Qthar Other Qthar Gthcr United States: 512012021 — 71312021 NOW A T MEOW Lineage Most 6.1.617.2 Delta common 6117 Al h U SA Type %Total 95%Pl VOC 51.70A 46.3-57.0% 80% p 8 v,,.. t4j.f fu f_-,.� 8.11.7 Iineage5 # P_1 Gamma VOC 8.91A 6.1 11_ 96 100IIIIIIMP 8.1.5 6 Iota Vol 3..0% 2.5-4.8% 70 13.1.1.7 B.1 1.1% 0.3-2_3% 8.1.1.519 0.1% 0.0-0.5% B.1.1.7 8.1.2 0.0 6 0.0-0.3% 60% 8.1.1.7 B.1.1.7 8.1.1.7 Additional 8.1.351 Beta VOC 0.2% 0.0-0.8% 8.1.1.7 Vo l VOC 6.1.5 5 Eta Vol 0.ODA 0.0-0.3% SO lineages# 8.1.4 9 Epsilon Vol 0.0% 0.0-0.S% 8.1.617.1 Kappa Vol 0.ODA 0.0-0.3% 6.1.4 7 Epsilon Vol 0.0% 0.0-0.S% 40% P_1 P-2 Zeta Vol 0.09b 0.0-0.3% Dther* Other 6.41A 3.5-9.6% 3011 B.1.617.2 1 P.1 ZQ% p-1 � P-� P_1 B.1.617.2 8.1.526 8.1.617.2 10,E 8.1.526 Other represents --20D additional lineages, which are each circulating at <1 % 8.1.526 of viruses B.1.42 8 1 526 8.1.526 ** These data include Nawcast esdmatea, which are modeled projections that 0 8.1.526 J may differ frarn weighted estimates generated at later dates # Sublineages of P_1 and 8.1.351 (P_1.1, P_1.2, B_1.351.2, B_1.351_3) are 4110121 4/ 4121 SA/21 5/22121 WWI 6}19121 713121 aggregated with the parent linteage and induded in parent lineage's proportion. HHS Region 10: 3)28)021 — 718)021 HH S Region 10: 6/ 0/ 0 '1 — 713) 021 IV{ WCAST 100% B.1.1.519 B.1.1.519 B.1.1.519 13.1.1.519 _ 13 D_ - _ 80% 70 I B.1.1.7 60% 13.1.1.7 13.1.1.7 13.11.7 Region 10 -Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington - Lineage Type Motal 95%P1 Most B.1-1-7 Alpha VOC 38.31% 23.5-55-9% common B.1-617.2 Delta VOC 22.4% 57.6-47-1% lineages # P-1 B.1.1.7 Gamma VOC 20.3%s 8-8-35-39b B.1-526 Iota Vol 8-2% 0-0-8-8%1a B.1 1-2%s 0-0-5-9 B.1-1-519 0-4% 0-0-2-9% B.1-2 0-0%s 0-0-2-9 Additional 13.1-851 Beta VOI/VOC B.1-429 Epsilon lineages # B.1-427 Epsilon B.1-525 Eta B.1-617.1 Kapr P-2 zeta VOC 0-5%s 0-0-2-9% Vol 0-2%s 0-0-2-9 Vol 0-1%s 0-0-2-9% Vol 0-1%s 0-0-2-9 Vol 0-0% 0-0-2-9% Vol 0-0%s 0-0-2-9 other* Other 2-3%s 0-0-11-8% 30 P-1 P.1 B.1.526 P-1 =modP-1 P-1 Ob z096 8.1.526 6.1.617.2 B.1.429 B.1.525 B.1.617.3 B.1.617.2 ID% B.1.429 B.1.526 � i Other represents'-200 additional lineages, which are each circulating at <1 % 13.1.429 B.1.526 _ of viruses B.1-4 B.1-427 B 1 526 ** These data include Nawcast estimates, which are modeled projections that may differ from weighted estimates generated at later dates 0 # Sublineages of P-1 and B.1.351 (P-1-1, P-1-2, B-1-351-2, B-1-351-3) are 4110121 4/24/21 5/8/21 5/22/21 6/5/21 6/19/21 7/3/21 aggregated with the parent linteage and included in parent lineage's proportion. ® AY.1 and AY-2 are aggregated with 13-1-617-2- Collection date, two weeks endi ng AY.1 and AY-2 are a0gre0ated with B_1 617.2 ip @ all Collection date, two weeks en di ng United States: 612012021 - 71312021 NOWCASTJ C G1 2 mal proportions from specimens ted the two weeks ending 71312021. :rritories not shown are included in regions: 11 - Region 2 ram, rM, GU, MH, MP, P - Regionid Updated July 6, 2021 SARSmCoVm2 Sequencing and Variants in Washington State Washington State Department of Health July 07, 2021 Cum ulative Ea rliest Most recent Name Area of -CDC Washington specimen qDecimen emergence designation cases collection ccllecWn detected date date United Variant of B_1.1_7 Calplia) Kingdom Concern 8,192 2021-01-07 2021-D6-28 Variant of B_1.351 (beta) South Africa 224 2020-01-29 2021-06-28 Concern Va riant of P_ 1 (gamma) Brazil 1,749 2021-02-06 2021-D6-26 Concern 8.1.6172 India Variant of 656 2021-04 3 2021-D6-28 (delta) concern B_ 1.427 C al ifomia Variant of 386 2020-12-11 2021-DS-28 (epsilon) interest B_ 1.429 C al ifomia Variant of 3,089 2021-11-20 2021436-24 (epsilon) interest B_1.526 (iota) New York VariantinterecrF 576 2021-01-21 2021-0r� B_ 1.525 (eta) New York Variant crF 71 2021-02-02 2021-05-1 a interest P_2 (zeta) Brazil Variant crF 37 2021-01-28 2021-D4-2(1 interest B.1.617.1 India Variant of 42 2021-0-22 2021-DS-04 Ckappa ) interest B.1.617.3 India crF D ian�net • Sequencing can be performed on stored specimens at any time, so the ea rl iest col lertion date may cha nge as additio nal specimen s are sequerrr:ed. B.1.517 has been broken down to multiple subl ineages: e.i_517_i, 8.1.617_21 Although the original d esignation of B_1.617 is still listed on the -CDC website as a va riant of irrterestr it will not be tradved on this report beta use no sequences get assigned as this varia nt_ Variants of Concern — Detections by County B.1.1.7 B.1.351 P.1 (gamma) B.1. 17. County (alpha) count (beta) count count (delta) count Skarnania 2 0 0 0 Snohomish 004 17 164 52 Spokane 142 1 04 1 Stevens 8 0 1 0 Thurston 105 4 6 1 Wahkiakum 4 0 2 0 Walla Walla 7 0 4 1 Whatcorn 379 3 176 1 Whitman 02 0 5 0 Yakima 190 11 87 62 25- 0- SARS-CoV-2 Lineages Circulating in Washington State r s WEI deKa (5 1 %) epsilon (8.7%) epsilon (6 5%) Other (7.3%) MEMMR gamma (10 311,o) gamma (15%) alpha (63 901D) Apr 25-My OS_ 21 alpha (69 411/,O) deEta (11.8 %) Other (9.8%) gamma (23%) alpha (47.3%) May 09-May 22, 21 May 23-Jury 05. 21 Specimen collection dates alpha (43. %) Jury 06-Jun 19. 21 Lineage ■ B_1.525 (eta) B_1.617.1 (kappa) B_1.427 (epsilM) B.1,351 (beta) ■ B.1.526 (iota) B_1.617.2 (delta) . B_1.429 (epsilon) Other ■ P.1 (gamma) B.1.1.7 (alpha) Variants Delta is rapidly overtaking Alpha as the dominant variant in the United States Delta is more transmissible than other highly transmissible variants (Alpha and Beta) Delta and some other variants have less response to post -infection sera, post -vaccination sera, and to some immunotherapy agents so vaccine breakthrough cases and reinfections are more likely to occur COVID-19 Seroprevalence (Infection -Acquired Immunity) LasrUpzmea, U n I t ed States O t D-19 Seraprevalence At�qut the btu-dy OS,?2-6,1202-L 0 Select a Two Wee r, Pe rioc to View tv2-1 ID IR 40 # ## 0 0 Aug Sap OCT Ncw Der So- Feb hue. A:Pr M.i By Z. 4P IG # SU IL NV OLFF 10 0 _ q, 1Z 9M.% 0 05,C 0 TRH # � �* TA * L.L 9 Una � -I Vrr49 4&nrigCn Forget ( OwawaI&rxe interpnetatiflrti'� Sam 4%Ird�CTed -2rv*cClrumed) NL<I00CbMi6 CXr irofeeLUed) Mai h (M La trf % i rf#ee vod ind +b I r+rfrtCt4 d or M&rcimr bdI % 1S.09-6 20.E 25.0% �. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#national-lab Last update 5/26/21, accessed 7/6/21 ?t C"% 40.E 46.0% =" _ A Se ra preva le nce Da to April 2021 (Second Half) Szeropirevalenr.e E_ sv make 6. N u mbe r of E st i m ated Iffectio s 481,000 Total Number of -Cases FZ-epto r red by End of 4/ 0ZI 4E):L,549 Antigen target: f udeocapsid (% Infected) C� 2QZi Mapb-ax t IDpenStreezMbp A catoirrienc Area, statewide N u rrrber of sarnp I e s T teo : tr3oi Age Specif is Se ropreva lence Estimate Sempl es 0-17 0 12_S 15 50-64 0 4_11a 427 65+ 0 3_6% 326 Sex -Specific Seropreva lenee Estimate Ma le 0 7_s% 550 Female 0 5_.3,!-G 751 Vaccination Rates Vaccinations Where and when are vaccinations being given? Who is getting vaccinated? COVID-19 IN WA STATE People Initiatinq Vaccination (Deceiving at least 1 dose) People Fully Vaccinated DATA AS OF 7/10/2021 PT This chart shows the number of people in Wash irator initiating vaccinatior (receiving at least 1 dose), People initiating vaccination represent the total number of people who have received at least one dose of any type of COVID-19 vaccine. Individuals who are fully vaccinated are included in the count of both People Initiating Vaccination and People Folly Vaccinated. Please note, the measures "vaccines given" and "people vaccinated" are not comparable. Vaccines given counts number of doses given in a location. People vaccinated counts number of Washington residents initiating vaccination and SELECT COUNTY TOTAL POPULATION INITIATING VACCINATION, (RECEIVING AT LEAST 1 DOSE) Percent of Total 59.8% search Population Initiating Pend Oreille County Vaccination Pierce County Percent of Total 54.5% San Juan County Population Fully Skagit County Vaccinated Skamania County Snohomish County Percent of Population 7f�.196 Spokane County Initiating Vaccination (15+) Stevens County Thurston County Percent of Population 64.1% Wahkiakum County FuIlyVaccinated(16+) _ Walla Walla County Percent of Population 68.6% Whatcom County Initiating Vaccination _ Whitman County (12+) Yakima County Percent of Population 62.5 Fully Vaccinated (12+) Legend ' 6096+ >45% to 60% >3C% to 45% �,15% to 30% ' �,O%to 15°% Zero Tabular View County data for people initiating vaccination are based on the vaccine recipient's county of residence, 118,076 people initiating I vaccination do not have a county reported. Far 362 people who initiated vaccination, we are unable to determine whether all Coumy4eve[ infarrn�on can be found on Local Health Jurisdiction (LNf) ebsttes Go back = ' Where and when are How many people are getting vaccinations being given? vaccinated? CDVID-19 IN WASHINGTON STATE Age iL _ p s who have been Vaccinated within each age group. LearnMore State Level SELECT COUNTY Search LCry 13 L-UUl lky Lincoln County Masan County Cikanogan County PaCiflC County Pend Oreille Cou... Pierce County San Juan County Skagit County Skamania County Snohomish County Spokane County Stevens County Thurston County Unassigned CoLrrfq Wahkiakum Coun.' Walla Walla Coum 00 Whatcom County Mitman County Yakima County liff PERCENT VACCINATED, WM-IIN AGE CROUP //Percent Initiating Vaccination Within Age Group * Percent Fully Vaccinated Within Age Group iaCl rG s 60% 43.7`Xa 4 2096 63.6% 56,89E 74.5% Vaccinations Sex �4� Race/Ethnicity DATA AS OF 7/7/2021 23:59 --7 I8-3 35-49 ]17-54 85- To protect privacy, counts of less than 10 are not reported. Some additional valves that count allowsomeone to calculatethose small numbers are also not reported. County -level inforrngtiorr carr be found on Local Healrh Jurrsdidian (!N}) w�bsttes Percent of Whatcom Residents Initiating COVID-19 Vaccination. 4O Total Population: 228,000 31 3% 53 Jan 2021 Feb 2021 Mar2021 Apr 20 1 May 2021 Jun 2021 Jul 2021 Go back = PercentVax < > o7l 1z ratcam Count Percent of Pope I ation ho have Initiawd CO D-19 Vacr-InatIon by Sub-Couri Area I%s 59. 552% ck sa ciK Valley 6.0°fa Mount Baker 39,5% ueningnarn 68.6% A https://www.whatcomcounty.us/coviddata Display accessed 7/7/21, data from DOH as of 7/3/21 COVID-19 Seroprevalence • Current seroprevalence surveys for antibodies to nucleocapsid indicate the extent of previous infection. • Prior infection reduces risk of reinfection by 80-85% over the seven months following infection. • WA seroprevalence is relatively low; natural immunity estimated at 6.6% compared to most other states (25-35%). • Post -infection and post -vaccine sera is less effective at neutralizing Delta and some other variants, indicating increased risk of reinfection and breakthrough cases Vaccine Efficacy • Prevention of infection >64% • Prevention of symptomatic COVI D-19 >85 • Prevention of hospitalization for COVID-19 >87% https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.htmI • "In the United States as of April 30, 2021, 10,262 breakthrough infections had been reported to the CDC amon 101 million full vaccinated individuals [0.01%, or one-hundredt of one percent .Of those with breakthrough infection, only 10 percent were hospita ized and 2 percent died, although not all hospitalizations or deaths were related to COVID-19. Twenty-seven percent of infections were asymptomatic." COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections Reported to CDC — United States, January 1—April 30, 2021 Weekly / May 28, 2021 Vaccine Safety FDA —Data monitoring and safety board must approve application for clinical trials • Phase 1 trial -safety of the vaccine candidate. Escalating doses given to healthy volunteers to determine side effects and tolerability. • Phase 2 trial -expands recruitment and may include participants with health conditions such as obesity, cancer, and diabetes. Active recruitment for participants of various demographics. Continued testing of the safety of the vaccine and its initial efficacy and how it affects the immune system. • Phase 3 trial -recruit thousands of participants to measure the efficacy of the vaccine in preventing disease. • Manufacturers submit their data with applications for EUA or licensing. Reviewed by FDA teams and by independent advisory board (VRBPAC) • Key to rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines was multiple vaccine platforms, previous development of vaccines for SARS-CoV-1, MERS, and others, and gene sequencing and sharing of genome within weeks of initial isolation of SAR-CoV-2 • Simultaneous Phase 2 and 3 trials, with public funding of trials allowed for compression of timeline with maintenance of safety review. • VAERS, v-safe, Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) for post -authorization safety surveillance COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy • Although response of variants to vaccines vary, all provide significant protection against current VOC, markedly reduce risk of severe disease/hospitalization/death, and reduce transmission. • New info on Delta variant response to vaccines show little efficacy from first dose mRNA vaccine, need full series to have significant protection. • FDA and CDC reviewing rare cardiac inflammation events following mRNA vaccine, clotting events following adenovirus vector vaccines. Vaccine safety system is identifying issues and investigating. • Risk of cardiac inflammation is higher and more severe with COVID-19 infection than from vaccine. AAP, ACC, CDC strongly recommend vaccination. • Guillan-Barre syndrome (about 100 cases) have been reported following AJ vaccine, not mRNA vaccines. Rare event. FDA issued a warning. Key Takeaways • Delta variant is poised to become the dominant variant in Washington and in Whatcom County. • Infection provides immunity but at the cost of risk of hospitalization, long COVID, and transmission to others. • We may be lucky and the trends continue to be good. We can hope for the best, but must prepare for the worst. • Vaccines are still effective against variants, and still our safest and most effective tool. Whatcom County Council Committee of the Whole COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360) 778-5010 Meeting Agenda VIRTUAL MEETING - ENDS BY 5 P.M. (TO PARTICIPATE, SEE INSTRUCTIONS AT www.whatcomcounty.us/joinvirtualcouncil OR CALL 360.778.5010); AGENDA REVISED 7.8.2021 Tuesday, July 13, 2021 2:25 PM Virtual Meeting COUNCILMEMBERS Rud Browne Barry Buchanan Tyler Byrd Todd Donovan Ben Elenbaas Carol Frazey Kathy Kershner CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Dana Brown -Davis, C.M.C. Council Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda July 13, 2021 Call To Order Roll Call Announcements Individuals who require special assistance to participate in the Council's meetings are asked to contact the Council Office at 360.778.5010 at least 96 hours in advance. Committee Discussion 1. AB2021-395 Discussion and periodic update of the Shoreline Management Program 2. AB2021-339 Discussion to establish a process for filling district court judicial vacancy 3. AB2021-345 Discussion regarding reopening Council operations to the public Committee Discussion and Recommendation to Council 1. AB2021-360 Ordinance to establish an independent review of the community response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Items Added by Revision 1. AB2020-219 Discussion and update on strategies and other items related to COVID-19 (Council and Health Board) ITEM ADDED 7.8.2021 Other Business Adiournment Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 71812021 File ID: AB2020-234 File Created: 05/27/2020 Department: Whatcom County Agenda Bill Master Report File Number: AB2020-234 Version: 1 Entered by: File Type: Discussion COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105 Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360)778-5010 Status: Discussed Assigned to: Council Committee of the Whole Final Action: 08/05/2020 Agenda Date: 08/05/2020 Enactment #: Primary Contact Email: DBrown@co.whatcom.wa.us TITLE FOR AGENDA ITEM: Discussion regarding goals, guidelines, and approach to updating current and future budgets SUMMARY STATEMENT OR LEGAL NOTICE LANGUAGE: Discussion regarding goals, guidelines, and approach to updating current and future budgets HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE FILE Date: Acting Body: 06/02/2020 Council 06/16/2020 Council Committee of the Whole 06/23/2020 Council Special Committee of the Whole 07/07/2020 Council Committee of the Whole 07/21/2020 Council Committee of the Whole 07/28/2020 Council (Special) 08/05/2020 Council Committee of the Whole Action: DISCUSSED AND MOTION(S) APPROVED DISCUSSED DISCUSSED AND MOTION(S) APPROVED DISCUSSED AND MOTION(S) APPROVED DISCUSSED DISCUSSED AND MOTION(S) APPROVED DISCUSSED Sent To: Attachments: Proposed Resolution, Approved Resolution 2020-026, Budget Goals and Priorities - Byrd, Frazey's Additions to Byrd's Priorities, Draft Minutes - 6.23 Budget Discussion Whatcom County Page 1 Printed on 2/13/2025 Agenda Bill Master Report Continued (AB2020-234) Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 2/13/2025 PROPOSED BY: BUCHANAN, DONOVAN INTRODUCTION DATE: JULY 7, 2020 I:4*1•1tell11[•LIZ[0 SUPPORTING THE EXECUTIVE'S BUDGET GOALS FOR 2021-22 WHEREAS, Section 2.20 of the Whatcom County Charter gives the County Council the power to levy taxes, appropriate revenue, and adopt budgets for the County; and WHEREAS, Section 3.22 of the Whatcom County Charter gives the Executive the power and duty to prepare and present budgets to the County Council; and WHEREAS, Section 6.20 of the Whatcom County Charter requires all agencies of County government to submit to the County Executive information necessary to prepare the budget at least one hundred thirty-five (135) days prior to the end of the budget cycle; and WHEREAS, Section 6.10 of the Whatcom County Charter requires the County Executive to present a complete budget and budget message to the County Council at least seventy-five (75) days prior to the end of each budget cycle; and WHEREAS, Section 6.10 of the Whatcom County Charter requires that the County Council shall adopt appropriation, tax and revenue ordinances for the next budget cycle at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the budget cycle; and WHEREAS, the Executive intends to present Budget recommendations to County Council in October 2020; and WHEREAS, given these deadlines enshrined in the County Charter, Council has somewhat limited time to amend budgets after October 2020; and WHEREAS, on May 15, 2020, the Executive provided Council his 2021-2022 Administrative Budget Priorities, listing the Executive's overarching goals for the 2021-22 budget cycle, and asked Council for its feedback; and WHEREAS, the budget process may be more efficient if the Council informs the Executive about Council's agreement with the Executive's overarching goals for the 2021-22 budget cycle prior to releasing budget instructions to agencies of County government, and prior to the Executive making final budget decisions in September of 2020; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council supports the Executive's following overarching goals for the 2021-22 budget cycle: • Take prudent steps to safeguard the long-term financial stability of County finances. • Maintain a reasonable level of service to provide the best possible services to our constituents by maintaining County workforce teams. • Maintain County assets and seek opportunities to improve operational efficiencies of overall County operations. • Continue to support our Public Health system as we respond to the COVID 19 pandemic. • Continue to support the Regional Economic Partnership (ADO office) Economic Development programs. • Develop reasonable Capital Project Budgets for the long-term needs of Whatcom County. • Continue Countywide initiatives to improve Housing Affordability, Wetlands Mitigation strategy, and Climate Change Mitigation. • Facilitate WIRA 1 policy and planning for all stakeholders. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Council has additional goals and priorities that it will also sent to the Executive. ATTEST: APPROVED this day of 12020. WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dana Brown -Davis, Clerk of the Council Barry Buchanan, Council Chair APPROVED AS TO FORM: Civil Deputy Prosecutor Whatcom County COUNTY COURTHOUSE 311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105 ' Bellingham, WA 98225-4038 (360) 778-5010 Agenda Bill Master Report File Number: AB2020-294 File ID: AB2020-294 Version: 1 Status: Approved as Amended File Created: 07/07/2020 Entered by: DBrown@co.whatcom.wa.us Department: Council Office File Type: Resolution Assigned to: Council Final Action: 07/07/2020 Agenda Date: 07/07/2020 Enactment #: RES 2020-026 Primary Contact Email: DBrown@co.whatcom.wa.us TITLE FOR AGENDA ITEM: Resolution supporting the Executive's Budget Goals for 2021-2022 SUMMARY STATEMENT OR LEGAL NOTICE LANGUAGE: Resolution supporting the Executive's Budget Goals for 2021-2022 HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE FILE Date: Acting Body: Action: 07/07/2020 Council APPROVED AS AMENDED Aye: 4 Browne, Buchanan, Donovan, and Frazey Nay: 2 Byrd, and Elenbaas Absent: 1 Kershner Attachments: Resolution as amended 7.7.2020 Sent To: Whatcom County Page t Printed on 71812020 PROPOSED BY: BUCHANAN, DONOVAN INTRODUCTION DATE: JULY 7, 2020 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-026 SUPPORTING THE EXECUTIVE'S BUDGET GOALS FOR 2021-22 WHEREAS, Section 2.20 of the Whatcom County Charter gives the County Council the power to levy taxes, appropriate revenue, and adopt budgets for the County; and WHEREAS, Section 3.22 of the Whatcom County Charter gives the Executive the power and duty to prepare and present budgets to the County Council; and WHEREAS, Section 6.20 of the Whatcom County Charter requires all agencies of County government to submit to the County Executive information necessary to prepare the budget at least one hundred thirty-five (135) days prior to the end of the budget cycle; and WHEREAS, Section 6.10 of the Whatcom County Charter requires the County Executive to present a complete budget and budget message to the County Council at least seventy-five (75) days prior to the end of each budget cycle; and WHEREAS, Section 6.10 of the Whatcom County Charter requires that the County Council shall adopt appropriation, tax and revenue ordinances for the next budget cycle at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the budget cycle; and WHEREAS, the Executive intends to present Budget recommendations to County Council in October 2020; and WHEREAS, given these deadlines enshrined in the County Charter, Council has somewhat limited time to amend budgets after October 2020; and WHEREAS, on May 15, 2020, the Executive provided Council his 2021-2022 Administrative Budget Priorities, listing the Executive's overarching goals for the 2021-22 budget cycle, and asked Council for its feedback; and WHEREAS, the budget process may be more efficient if the Council informs the Executive about Council's agreement with the Executive's overarching goals for the 2021-22 budget cycle prior to releasing budget instructions to agencies of County government, and prior to the Executive making final budget decisions in September of 2020; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council supports the Executive's following overarching goals for the 2021-22 budget cycle: • Take prudent steps to safeguard the long-term financial stability of County finances. • Maintain a reasonable level of service to provide the best possible services to our constituents by maintaining County workforce teams. • Maintain County assets and seek opportunities to improve operational efficiencies of overall County operations. • Continue to support our Public Health system as we respond to the COVID 19 pandemic. • Continue to support the Regional Economic Partnership (ADO office) Economic Development programs. • Develop reasonable Capital Project Budgets for the long-term needs of Whatcom County. • Continue Countywide initiatives to improve Housing Affordability, Wetlands Mitigation strategy, and Climate Change Mitigation. • Facilitate WRIA 1 policy and planning for all stakeholders. • Prepare an addendum for General Fund, and other funds reliant on General Fund transfers, that includes a prioritized targeted list of cost reduction proposals totaling 20% of the unrestricted revenue. • Prioritized available funding for the benefit of children and families. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Council has additional goals and priorities that will also send to the Executive. APPRQVE)D'ftsij7,th day of July NO ;rye m� 6 ATTESt:' b w °Y ... .w ..%i✓ '`M .., .. _vim_ Dana Ir Ki4- avi��r I�gf tVhe Council ®® � 5kA APPROVED AS TO FORM: Approved via Email / KF / LB Civil Deputy Prosecutor WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL TCOM 0 TY, WASHINGTON Baoyc—han n, Council Chair rocess The Process Objectives Take a more proactive role in establishing the budget. Establish a framework which allows the Council to work more effectively together. Provide clear guidance to County Executive and Department's. Streamline's process, saving staff time and while allowing initiates to get started sooner. Council Suggestions: Reduce redundancies within County Examples of Budget Goals 1. Establish two budgets reflecting a 10% and 20% decrease from 2019 revenue. 2. Achieve county -wide unemployment rate of 5% or less by end of 2022. 3. Achieve a balanced and affordable housing market, with MSI between 5-7 months and vacancy rate between 5-7% by end of 2023. What are Guiding Principles 1. Guidelines that allow for consistent decision making. 2. Principles that will help us to achieve goals. 3. Typically no more than 10. 4. Can be used to support all decision making from budget to project selection. Examples of Guiding Principles 1. Prioritize projects or initiatives working with Whatcom County businesses. 2. Prioritize deferred maintenance projects. 3. Prioritize projects which leverage third party grant funding. 4. Invest in digital infrastructure. 5. Retain expertise within staffing. 6. Ensure transparency in decisions, information, and data. 7. Prioritize environmentally sustainable solutions. Council Suggestions: - Work within our authority. - Prioritize cost sharing, collaboration with other jurisdictions. - Look better output for community at a better cost. - Children and families first. - Combining requests for bids to leverage bulk purchasing power for goods and services. - Reduce redundancies within County - Continuity of county services and staff Possible Actions a Invite local economist to give presentation on impacts and opportunities in Whatcom County. Budget Process Invite local business owner(s) to give presentation on impacts to their ext business(es) and areas of concern or opportunity. Childcare, Team Whatcom, Port, Chamber of Commerce. Steps Establish scoring system to prioritize projects based on available funds. Council members identify and suggest possible budget cuts, reallocations, and new opportunities to support community and economic growth. Review potential projects to identify what should be included in 2021-22 budget. Reach out and invite tribes to participate in conversation Host collaborative multi -council strategy and vision work session. Hold a public hearing for the community to participate and provide feedback. Request departments heads to complete questionnaire, providing information to understand demand and potential changes. Date 6/16 : Carol 6/16 Councilmember Frazey's Additions to Budget Discussion 6116120 *Additions in red. Budget Goals 1. Establish two budgets reflecting a 10% and 20% decrease from 2019 revenue. 2. Achieve county -wide unemployment rate of 5% or less by end of 2022. 3. Achieve a balanced and affordable housing market, with MSI between 5-7 months and vacancy rate between 5-7% by end of 2023. 4. Invest in upstream prevention and interventions in lieu of costly remediation strategies 5. Increase the number of students ready to enter kindergarten by 50% by end of 2022 (increase from current rate of 47% for Whatcom County to 70%). What are Guiding Principles 1. Guidelines that allow for consistent decision making. 2. Principles that will help us to achieve goals. 3. Typically no more than 10. 4. Can be used to support all decision making from budget to project selection. Guiding Principles **1. Prioritize the health and well-being of children and families, with explicit emphasis on those most vulnerable. Invest in preventions and intervention services for children and families. 1. Prioritize projects or initiatives working with Whatcom County businesses. (Do this within the scope of what business will look like as we emerge from COVID-19) 2. Prioritize deferred maintenance projects. Prioritize within this list relative to critical vs. what can be delayed. 3. Prioritize projects which leverage third party grant funding. 1 4. Invest in digital infrastructure. (This should be a TOP priority. We NEED fast, reliable internet throughout the ENTIRE County.) 5. Retain expertise within staffing. 6. Ensure transparency in decisions, information, and data. 7. Prioritize environmentally sustainable solutions. 8. Look at issues upstream that result in increased costs to the community. Use this challenging time to reprioritize funding. Council Suggestions -Work within our authority. - Prioritize cost sharing, collaboration with other jurisdictions. - Look better output for community at a better cost. - Children and families first. (Move this to FIRST) - Combining requests for bids to leverage bulk purchasing power for goods and services. - Reduce redundancies within County — Continuity of county services and staff — More Government, Non -Profit, Business, Volunteer Combinations (Consider collaborative resources to support businesses, childcare, other nonprofits. — Sustainable Connections Food Recovery Program, Whatcom Community Land Trust, Whatcom Mountain Bike Coalition) Next Steps -Possible Actions -Possible Actions Date Invite local economist to give presentation on impacts and opportunities in Whatcom County. - Invite local business owner(s) to give presentation on impacts to their business(es) and areas of concern or opportunity. Childcare, Team Whatcom, Port, Chamber of Commerce. 6/16 : Carol z -Invite large nonprofit service agencies to present the impact of COVID-19 on their operations and their plans to reinvent themselves moving forward. Consider how to centralize support services for nonprofits. - Establish scoring system to prioritize projects based on available funds. -Council members identify and suggest possible budget cuts, reallocations, and new opportunities to support community and economic growth. -Review potential projects to identify what should be included in 2021-22 budget. -Reach out and invite tribes to participate in conversation -Host collaborative multi -council strategy and vision work session. -Hold a public hearing for the community to participate and provide feedback. -Request departments heads to complete questionnaire, providing information to understand demand and potential changes. 3 Council Special Committee of the Whole Committee Minutes - Draft Minutes June 23, 2020 DRAFT MINUTES - JUNE 23 SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1. AB2020-234 Discussion regarding goals, guidelines, and approach to updating current and future budgets Dana Brown -Davis, Clerk of the Council, stated that one response came in from councilmembers on this item. Buchanan spoke about a grant from the MacArthur Foundation and a conference he attended concerning the reduction of incarceration with regard to mental health and racial disparity. An idea for using the grant money is enhancing the Ground -Level Response and Coordinated Engagement (GRACE) and the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) programs. He stated he would like to see that as a budget priority. Tyler Schroeder, Executive's Office, answered a concern about giving specific and tangible information that the Administration can use to develop the budget and communicate to the department heads. The budget priority meeting has been re -scheduled for July 8, 2020 so they can incorporate councilmember goals into the document. Councilmembers discussed whether the LEAD and GRACE programs have the ability to function in an advisory role to the Council and whether they should put together a committee that could function as an advisory role to the Council concerning race relations in Whatcom County. They discussed the following possible budget priorities: • Reducing redundancies in Whatcom County government by putting the Parks Department under the Public Works Department • Focusing on values that the Council has influence over • Investing in upstream prevention and interventions in lieu of costly remediation strategies • Funding the homeless outreach team • Consolidating County building work space by allowing family friendly work -from -home policies if employees choose and if they are able to complete their job responsibilities • Keeping the current COVID-19 jail booking procedures Byrd led a discussion about budget priorities and goals using the document, Frazey's Additions to Byrd's Priorities (on file). Whatcom County page I Council Special Committee of the Whole Committee Minutes - Draft Minutes June 23, 2020 DRAFT MINUTES - JUNE 23 SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Councilmembers discussed establishing two budgets reflecting a 10 percent and 20 percent decrease from 2019 revenue, whether they should request that the Administration produce two different budgets, waiting first to hear what the Executive's Office proposes, requesting that the Administration just prepare a budget with a 20 percent decrease from the 2019 revenue, whether the Council should direct the Executive's Office on a specific percentage and what that should be. Tyler Schroeder, Executive's Office, answered questions about whether they are going to get new revenue forecasts or sales tax projections, what percentage of the budget the Administration is thinking of cutting, and what percentage of the County's revenue comes from sales tax. He stated the Administration will put together a 2021-2022 budget based on an amended 2020 budget which will be based on projections on sales and property tax revenues. They will present a balanced budget based on projections with a game plan for accomplishing reductions if the revenues don't turn out to be as forecasted. Councilmembers continued to discuss the item. Brad Bennett, Administrative Services Department, spoke about the percentage of the decrease and stated that sales and property tax reduction was less than they thought but they will need to look at why. Money that is discretionary is limited but they will come up with some realistic and conservative revenue estimates and then try and manage a budget within that. Then they will identify where they would have to cut, but reductions across the board do not always work. Byrd suggested a motion to establish a single budget reflecting a 20 percent decrease from 2019 revenue. Councilmembers discussed establishing a budget without a fixed amount of decrease but with a contingency if there is a 20 percent decrease in revenue, requesting the Executive to prepare a budget with a supplemental reflecting what would be done differently or what would have to change in the budget if revenues drop by 20 percent, not creating more work for the departments by asking them to work on a scenario that may not come into fruition, and leaving it up to the Executive's Office and Finance to propose a budget. Schroeder stated in the past the Administration has prepared negative additional service requests which would show where in the organization you can accomplish reductions. A valuable conversation in the next couple Whatcom County page 2 Council Special Committee of the Whole Committee Minutes - Draft Minutes June 23, 2020 DRAFT MINUTES - JUNE 23 SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE months with Council will be prioritizing where in the organization those program reductions would have to happen. Browne moved to request the Executive to prepare a budget with a supplemental reflecting what would be done if revenue decreases by 20 percent. The motion was seconded by Byrd. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Buchanan, Byrd, Elenbaas, Frazey, Kershner, and Browne Nay: 1 - Donovan Councilmembers discussed the following goal as presented on the screen by Byrd: Achieve a balanced and affordable housing market, with Monthly Sales Inventory (MSI) between five and seven months and vacancy rate between five to seven percent by end of 2023. Browne suggested alternative language for the goal: Focus on identifying and removing barriers to affordable housing. Byrd stated they could change the year from 2023 to 2025. Byrd moved to approve the goal: Achieve a balanced and affordable housing market, with MSI between five and seven months and vacancy rate between five to seven percent by the end of 2025. The motion was seconded by Frazey. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Byrd, Elenbaas, Frazey, Kershner, Browne, and Buchanan Nay: 0 Absent: 1 - Donovan out of the meeting Councilmembers discussed the remaining proposed goals: Kershner moved to approve the goal: Increase the number of students ready to enter kindergarten by 50 percent by the end of 2022 (increase from current rate of 47 percent for Whatcom County to 70 percent). The motion was seconded by Byrd. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Elenbaas, Frazey, Kershner, Buchanan, Byrd, and Browne NnX- 1 - Donovnn Whatcom County page 3 Council Special Committee of the Whole Committee Minutes - Draft Minutes June 23, 2020 DRAFT MINUTES - JUNE 23 SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Browne moved to approve the goal: Invest in upstream prevention and interventions in lieu of costly remediation strategies including incarceration and racial disparity. The motion was seconded by Kershner. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Elenbaas, Frazey, Kershner, Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, and Donovan Nay: 0 Kershner moved to approve the goal: Achieve county -wide unemployment rate of five percent or less by end of 2022. Byrd suggested a friendly amendment to make the year 2025. Kershner accepted the friendly amendment and the motion was seconded by Byrd. Councilmembers discussed the motion. Donovan suggested a friendly amendment to change the rate of unemployment to two percent. The friendly amendment was not accepted. Councilmembers continued to discuss the goal. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Frazey, Kershner, Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, and Elenbaas Nay: 1 - Donovan Whatcom County page 4