HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 September 18 1984 Special Fire District 15WHATCOM COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE
P.O. Box 398 JOAN OGDpN, Auditor
Bellingham, WA 98225 phone 676 - 6740
OFFICIAL CANVASS OF THE SPECIAL ELECTION HELD IN WHATCOM COUNTY,
WASHINGTON ON THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUB-
MITTING TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS IN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 15,
WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON THE PROPOSITION TO RESTORE IT'S REGULAR
PROPERTY TAX LEVY TO $1.00 PER THOUSAND DOLLARS OF ASSESSED VALUE.
OATH OF AUDITOR
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
COUNTY OF WHATCOM )
I do solemnly swear that the returns purporting to be the election
returns of Fire Protection District No. 15, Whatcom County, Washington
held on the 18th day of September, 1984, have in no wise been altered by
additions or erasures, and that they are the same as when they were
deposited in my office, SO HELP ME GOD.
, Whdtcom 9bup.ty -Auditor �
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th da .�
y �c�. September , .=1:9 8.4 .
CERTIFICATE OF CANVASSING BOARD
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
1 ss.
COUNTY OF WHATCOM )
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT we, as the Whatcom County Canvassing Committee,
have completed our canvass of votes as it pertains to the Special Election
held within the boundaries of Fire Protection District No. 15, Whatcom County,
Washington on the 18th daX of September, 1984, and the results were as follows:
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 15
Special Election —Proposition No. 1 PASSED 60
Submitted by Fire Protraction District No. 16
AUTHORIZING PROPERTY TAX LEVY
Shall Whatcom County Fire Protection District No. 16
YES - 123 0 VOTES, YES 138
be authorized to restore its regular property tax levy
to 01.00 par thousand dollars of assessed value? NO - 124 + VOTES, NO 92
(This shall not be construed to authorize an excess 1 9
levy and shall be subject to otherwise applicable
statutory limits.)
The canvass having been completed this 26tn day of September, 1984.
WHATCOM COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD
��C"e Aa5e'v"
Co,
,qhty'Aud'�
t A tCp• L County, rti•tre ;,authority
5 T ATE 0 ``� County Pro8bQuting Attorney
OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Date:
TO"
Dept. --lti
RE:
FROM: '
For your info
Per your request
k
For action
Review/Comment
For approval
Return to files
Was defendant
served? When?.
Return confirmecy
certified copies
l
.NFANK5 M.
D �!1-, lb If
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.15
WHATCOM COUNTY
RESOLUTION NO. 35
A resolution of the Board of Fire Commissioners of Whatcom County
Fire Protection District No. 15, providing for the submission to the
qualified electors of the district at a Special Electon to be held
therein, in conjuction with the primary election on September 18., 1984
of the proposition which would authorize lifting the 106% LID Law for
Whatcom County Fire Protection District No. 15.
WHEREAS, in the judgement of the Board of Fire Commissioners of
the district, it is essential and necessary for the protection of the
public health, life, and property, that necessary equipment be acquired
to adequately supply the residents of said district with fire suppres—
sion capabilities.
WHEREAS, the inflationary increase of operation has exceded the
revenue, due to restrictions imposed by legislative action, from the
property tax.
THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, that the Board of Fire Commissioners
of Whatcom County Fire Protection District No. 15 submit a proposal to
the qualified electors of said district requestion authorization to
restore the $1.00 per thousand dollars of assessed valuation;, which
does not exceed the statutory limit authorized by laws, without a vote
of the resident electors of said district.
ADOPTED AT THE REGULArR MEETION OF THE Board of Commissioners of
Whatcom County Fire Protection District No. 15 this 23rd. day of Aprial
1984.
Chairman
4CM:m issioner
Commissione
as �K
a � .� F.�4 Hvot
ATTEST: _ �i. � � �n �S1 a
Secretary
o£
h�
ra-41VT
AUTHORIZING PROPERTY TAX LEVY
Shall Whatcom County Fire
authorized to restore it's
$1.00 per thousand dollars
Protection District No. 15 be
regular property tax levy to
of assessed value?
(This shall not be -construed to authorize an excess levy
and shall be subject to otherwise applicable statutory
limits).
YES
-'Cl—