HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket Water Work Session Nov 14 2023Whatcom County
Council Water Work Session
COUNTY COURTHOUSE
311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105
Bellingham, WA 98225-4038
(360) 778-5010
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 14, 2023
10:30 AM
Civic Center Building Conference Room / Hybrid Meeting
HYBRID MEETING - (PARTICIPATE IN -PERSON, SEE REMOTE JOIN
INSTRUCTIONS AT www.whatcomcounty.us/joinvirtualcouncil, OR CALL
360.778.5010)
COUNCILMEMBERS
Barry Buchanan
Tyler Byrd
Todd Donovan
Ben Elenbaas
Carol Frazey
Kaylee Galloway
Kathy Kershner
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL
Dana Brown -Davis, C.M.C.
Council Water Work Session Meeting Agenda November 14, 2023
Call To Order
Roll Call
Announcements
Individuals who require special assistance to participate in the Council's meetings are asked to contact
the Council Office at 360.778.5010 at least 96 hours in advance. This committee meeting is also noticed
as a meeting of the Whatcom County Council, with the agenda limited to committee business.
Meeting Materials
AB2023-493 Meeting Materials for the Water Work Session November 14, 2023
Water Issues Update
Proposed 2024 Flood Control Zone District Budget
Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Association River Stewards Report
WRIA 1 Planning Unit update
Other Business
Adjournment
Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 411612025
• Whatcom County COUNTY COURTHOUSE
311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105
Bellingham, WA 98225-4038
(360)778-5010
• Agenda Bill Master Report
File Number: AB2023-493
File ID: AB2023-493 Version: 1 Status: Received
File Created: 07/21/2023 Entered by:
Department: File Type: Receipt of Document(s)
Assigned to: Council Water Work Session Final Action: 11/14/2023
Agenda Date: 11/14/2023 Enactment#:
Primary Contact Email: kfelbing@co.whatcom.wa.us
TITLE FOR AGENDA ITEM:
Meeting Materials for the Water Work Session November 14, 2023
SUMMARY STATEMENT OR LEGAL NOTICE LANGUAGE:
None
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE FILE
Date: Acting Body: Action: Sent To:
11/14/2023 Council Water Work Session RECEIVED
Attachments: Agenda and Packet, Nooksack Presentation for 11.14.2023
Whatcom County Page 1 Printed on 4/16/2025
WHATCOM COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ELIZABETH KOSA
Director
MEMORANDUM
NATURAL RESOURCES
322 N. Commercial Street, Suite 110
Bellingham, WA 98225
Telephone: (360) 778-6230
FAX: (360) 778-6231
www. whatcomcounty. us
TO: The Honorable Satpal Singh Sidhu, Whatcom County Executive, and
Honorable Members of the Whatcom County Council
THROUGH: Elizabeth Kosa, Director
FROM: Gary S. Stoyka, Natural Resources Program Manager
DATE: November 7, 2023
RE: November 14, 2023 Council Water Work Session
Please refer to the proposed agenda below for the next Water Work Session. Additional supporting
documents may be distributed at or before the meeting.
AGENDA
Date:
Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Time:
10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
Place:
Hybrid Meeting:
In Person: Civic Center Garden Level Conference Room (322 N. Commercial St., Street Level)
Virtual: For instructions on how to watch or participate in this meeting, please visit us at
www.whatcomcounty.us/ioinvirtualcouncil or contact the Council Office at 360.778.5010. View
meeting schedules, agendas, minutes, videos, and archives at www.whatcom.legistar.com.
Time
Topic
Council Action
Background Information
Requested
Attached
10:30 AM —
Water Issues Update
Informational
None
10:45 AM
10:45 AM —
Proposed 2024 Flood Control Zone District
Informational
Proposed 2024 Flood
11:15 AM
Budget
Control Zone District
Budget
11:15 AM —
Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Association
Informational
None
11:45 AM
River Stewards Report
11:45 AM —
WRIA 1 Planning Unit update
Informational
None
12:00 PM
If you have questions, please feel free to call me at (360) 778-6218.
cc:
Dana Brown -Davis
Kristi Felbinger
Jill Nixon
Jennifer Schneider
Karen Frakes
Erika Douglas
John Thompson
Paula Harris
Kraig Olason
Chris Elder
Cathy Craver
Doug Ranney
Melissa Donnelly
Roland Middleton
Erin Page
Josh Fleischmann
Mark Personius
Tyler Schroeder
Sue Sullivan
Brandy Reed
Bennett Knox
Exhibit A Flood Control Zone District
Proposed 2024 Budget
OVERALL
BUDGET SUMMARY
Budget
Program
Approved 2023
Budget
Supplemented
2023 Budget
2023 Year End
Projection
Code
Revenues
Expenditures
Revenues
Expenditures
Revenues
Expenditures
100
Adminstration
$ 6,472,000
$
1,297,083
$ 6,472,000
$ 1,301,730
$ 6,466,922
$ 1,161,778
100
Transfers -ToStormwater
$
1,512,800
$ 1,512,800
$ 800,000
102
Flood Response
$ -
$
110,000
$ -
$ 110,000
$ -
$ -
104
Flood Planning
$ 1,132,000
$
1,470,000
$ 1,782,000
$ 2,161,198
$ 1,380,440
$ 1,626,690
106
Technical Assistance
$ -
$
75,000
$ -
$ 75,000
$ -
$ 45,000
108
NFIP and CRS
$ 12,000
$
127,000
$ 12,000
$ 127,000
$ 15,000
$ 136,000
110
Early Warning
$ 4,413
$
174,800
$ 95,488
$ 265,875
$ 95,620
$ 190,000
112
Repair and Maintenance
$ 5,026,827
$
6,251,204
$ 5,220,731
$ 7,198,314
$ 3,158,840
$ 3,272,526
114
Flood Hazard Reduction
$ 8,360,630
$
11,013,080
$ 20,717,929
$ 23,128,874
$ 4,570,453
$ 5,427,421
119
Natural Resources
$ -
$
792,921
$ -
$ 792,921
$ -
$ 792,921
120
Aquatic Invasive Species
$ 20,000
$
212,691
$ 20,000
$ 212,691
$ 20,000
$ 212,691
121
Water Planning
$ 187,500
$
1,035,078
$ 359,927
$ 1,499,533
$ 264,535
$ 1,485,593
122
Climate Action Planning
$ 280,017
$
280,017
$ 356,496
$ 355,150
$ 380,000
$ 380,000
123
Marine Resources Committee
$ 246,728
$
269,672
$ 246,728
$ 269,672
$ 246,728
$ 269,672
124
Water Quality
$ 146,500
$
841,459
$ 146,500
$ 846,303
$ 146,500
$ 862,102
125
Salmon Recovery
$ -
$
326,691
$ -
$ 326,691
$ -
$ 326,691
126
Lake W hatcom
$
$
88,191
$
$ 88,191
$
$ 88,191
700
NPDES
$
$
172,000
$
$ 172,000
$
$ 80,000
TOTAL
$ 21,888,615
$
26,049,686
$ 35,429,799
$ 40,443,942
$ 16,745,038
$ 17,157,274
(DECREASE)IINCREASE
IN FUND BALANCE
$ (4,161,071)
$ (5,014,144)
$ (412,236)
Notes:
Program Manager
Projected 2023 Lapse:
53 % Rev Lapse
58 % Exp Lapse
Assumes no fall flood in 2023; 2024
budget includes funding
for flood response and
new repair
Starting Balance
4,783,796
Projected Net Annual Activity
951,363
Projected Balance
5,735,159
2024 Proposed Budget Net Annual Activity
(3,819,929)
Budget proposed fund balance at year end
1,915,230
2024 Proposed ASR Net Activity
(381,781)
Budget proposed fund balance after ASRs at year end
1,533,449
Add back expense lapse of 30 % (with related grant income reduction)
4,254,458
Projected fund balance with lapse considered
5,787,907
1/1/2023
1/1/2024
1/1/2025
Proposed:
Revenues
7,062,925
1,448,000
12,000
4,680
2,772,725
18,163,913
20,000
125,000
124,000
615,211
30,348,454
(3,819,929)
024 Budget
Expenditures
$ 1,716,623
$ 1,304,811
$ 120,000
$ 1,815,000
$ 75,000
$ 177,000
$ 193,000
$ 4,139,439
$ 20,619,039
$ 911,181
$ 230,826
$ 744,164
$ 136,861
$ 1,257,375
$ 468,815
$ 87,249
$ 172,000
$ 34,168,383
Starting - Beginning 2023 $ 4,783,796
Budgeted Activity 2023 $ (412,236)
Unprojected Lapse Calc all except 112&114 $ 1,268,599 15
Outstanding SBR's not yet budgeted $ -
FEMA Revenue from 2021/2022 recovery $ 95,000
EOY 2023 Fund Balance - With Lapse $ 5,735,159
Proposed.
Revenues
!024 ASR's
Expenditures
$ 2,700
$ 35,000
500,000
$ 785,000
$ 50,000
68,000
$ 77,081
568,000
$ 949,781
(381,781)
Lapse Used
30
Exhibit A Flood Control Zone District
2024 Flood Program Budget
Work Plan and Supporting Documentation
DETAIL FOR FCZD PROGRAM AREAS
FLOOD MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS
Proposed 2024 Budget
Flood Response (169102)
Revenues
Expenditures
Assumptions/Notes
Wage and Benefits
$ 20,000
ASR
$ -
15,000 OT Wages
Sand and sandbags
$ 35,000
Includes pre -deployed and sand bags for training
Preparedness training
$ 5,000
Road and M&O employees and equipment
Sector observers during response
$ 40,000
Road employees wages and benefits for 1
significant flood event
Construction contracts
$ 20,000
During and immediately following response (may
supplement with 112 Emerg. New Projects)
TOTAL
$ -
$ 120,000
Budget based on 2021 flood with cost & wage
increases
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ (120,000)
2023 YE projection assumes no fall flood
Flood Planning (169104)
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues
Expenditures
Assumptions/Notes
Lower Nooksack
Wage and Benefits
$ 130,000
CFHMP refinement/update
Facilitation
$ 100,000
6630 2023 amendmt added $100k and CM to team;
add budget in late 2024 to carry into 2025
FLIP support/Technical/Engineering design/Plan
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
6630 NEW Proviso on 7/1/23; 100k billed above'22
Proviso thru 6/30/23; Herrera contracts
amendments both years
SBR/CA
Herrera contract and '22 Proviso CA - YE in
above row
Sediment management
$ 80,000
$ 100,000
7210 23-25 FbD grant FLIP support task for rev
FLIP support for ag (AWB, farmer stipends, tribes)
$ 128,000
$ 160,000
7210 Pass through funding for ag consultant, Cities and
tribes, farmers stipends- revenues from FbD
Instream flow study for DBM - used for gw model
$ -
$ -
6630 19-21 FbD grant used for gw model support -
FLIPSC did not support ISF study; will CA into'24
if not spent
Transfer from 722002 for Storage Study
Anchor contract - may CA into '24; revenues from
Commerce grant
River bathymmetry (LIDAR + boat survey)
$ 240,000
$ 300,000
7210 New river bathy to evaluate changes incapacity;
revenues from '23-25 FbD grant
High water mark survey
$ 25,000
6630
CA
$ -
6630 Collins-Woerman contract balance
TOTAL
$ 1,448,000
$ 1,815,000
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ (367,000)
Technical Assistance (169106)
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues
Expenditures
Assumptions/Notes
Wage and Benefits
$ 75,000
TOTAL
$ -
$ 75,000
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ (75,000)
National Flood Insurance Prgm (169108)
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues
Expenditures
Assumptions/Notes
Wage and Benefits
$ 150,000
FEMA Floodplain mapping
$ -
$ 12,000
Assumes LNR mapping in 2023 - expenditures for
public meeting notice
Permit reviews
$ 12,000
$ -
Flood permit fees
Public education/CRS activities
$ -
$ 15,000
CRS mailings
TOTAL
$ 12,000
$ 177,000
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ (165,000)
Early Warning System (169110)
Proposed 2024 Budget
Assumptions/Notes
Exhibit A
Flood Control Zone District
2024 Flood Program Budget
Work Plan and Supporting Documentation
Wage and Benefits
Nooksack River gages - USGS
Transfer from 722002
Everson MainSt stage gage _ USGS
Emergency access to SNOTEL
Equipment for gage upgrades/repairs
Repairs and maintenance
TOTAL
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
FLOOD CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENTS
Repair and Maintenance (169112)
Wage and Benefits '
Misc
Construction Projects
Emergency/new projects as needed
Miscellaneous repair projects
Marine Drive Levee Repair 2020 damage (720004)
Transfer
Truck Road 2020 Damage (720008)
Net result of CA and budget transfer
Everson Overflow Pipeline Bank Stabilization (720009)
CA
Bertrand Creek Levee Stabilization (721002)
Jones Creek Revetment Repair (722004)
Acme Woody Revetment Repair (723008)
Hudson Rd Bridge No. 132 Repair (722006)
Devries Levee
SBR-3684 Timon
Transfer in from Jones
SBR-3685 Upper Hampton
Transfer in from Jones
Mitigation Planning/Implementation
Jail crew
Reveg planning/coordination
Reveg/misc supplies
TOTAL
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
Revenues Expenditures
$ 1,000
$ - $ 165,000
$ 4,680 $ -
$ - $ 5,000
$ $ 12,000
$ $ 10,000
$ 4,680 $ 193,000
$ (188,320)
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues Expenditures
$ 170,000
50,000 $
38,000 $
2,279,525 $
19,000 $
274,575 $
111,625 $
350,000
50,000
30,000
2,332,000
17,500
10,000
274,500
110,000
10,000
406,000
222,000
$ $ 117,439
$ $ 30,000
$ $ 10,000
$ 2,772,725 $ 4,139,439
$ (1,366,714)
2023 YE rev from Commerce grant for new
gages; M&O costs increased 3% COLA
Canadians reimburse cost to maintain gage; AVZ
pays for Jones gage directly
Equip at NF gage may need replacing
Assumptions/Notes
Assumed costs for responding to flood/new
repairs (assumes no fall 2021 flood)
Placeholder for small projects; fall 2019 flood
assumed
revenues include wages; planting in'24
Rev are 90% FEMA 5% State 2.5% Roads; rev inc
wages
BA moved to Marine Drive
revenues include wages; planting in'24
NHC contract balance
Incoprorated into deflectionberm project
90% FEMA 5% State cost -share includes wages
90% FEMA 5% State cost -share. ?Roads to Cost
Share 2.5%? Assumes no bridge replacement
requirement, and RF does work, not M&O
Design (in-house) and survey; SWIF project
Anticipating 2024 activity instead of 2023
Anticipating 2024 activity instead of 2023
Anticipating 2024 activity instead of 2023
Anticipating 2024 activity instead of 2023
Jail crew labor for FCZD and SW IF projects;
available to diking or subzones
New 2-year contract in 2023
Increased to cover plant replacement costs for
Deming and other past projects as needed
Exhibit A
Flood Control Zone District
2024 Flood Program Budget
Work Plan and Supporting Documentation
Flood Hazard Reduction(169114)
Wage and Benefits
Misc
SBR-3681 Buyout Program
Transferred to 723002, 723003, 723004to 3 new cost centers
Swift Creek
Bank stabilzation/channel excavation
Lower Nooksack River
Walton Property Management
Leases for agriculture
Other'19-21 FbD Early Action Projects (TBD):
Everson side channel
Appraisals
21-23 FbD Early Actions:
Mouw Ditch
Reach 2 early actions
23-25 FbD Early Actions:
Floodplain acquisition
Continuing Appropriation for Arch Services
Moved to: 19-21 FbD Acquisitions
19-21 FbD Acquisitions
Commerce - acquisition - Transfer from 722002 for tracking
SBR SBR3929 - FEMA grant (COVID)
Continuing Appropriation (CA)
Marietta property acquisition & demo New properties
21-23 FbD acquisition
23-25 FbD acquisition
Ferndale Levee Improvement Project (719008)
CA
Lynden Levee Improvement Project (in conjunction with
USACE rehab project) (718005)
Abbott Levee Improvement (SWIF) (718010)
CA
Cougar Creek Early Action Project Design (720010)
CA
SBR
South Fork Fish Camp Project (72
Phase 1 design/construction
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues Expenditures
$ 200,000
$ $ 131,226
$ 16,800 $
$ 6,900 $
$ 336,000 $ 420,000
$ 600,000 $ 750,000
$ 866,313
$ 866,313
$ 9,600,000
$ 9,600,000
$ -
$ 150,000
$ -
$ 50,000
$ 1,200,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 3,200,000
$ 4,000,000
$ 344,000
$ 430,000
$ 138,000 $ 226,000
$ $ 67,500
880,000 $ 880,000
Assumptions/Notes
USGS gage upgrades, storage study, appraisals
in 2022; buyout in 2023
■ 1 1
300k commitment per year; 150k Roads;
remainder cost -shared 70/30 b/w FCZD and SNE
Subzone Sublect to CPI-W Increases
=— '-I A
Revenues are from lease
River Rd and Emmerson Rd properties
22 is for appraisals and side channel; 23 Balance
of task budget in 2019-21 FbD grant: proiects TBD
for HMGP fast -track properties, and state -funded
purchases
Pass-thru funding from '21-23 FbD to Lynden; will
CA if not spent out in '23
Projects TBD - may reallocate to Cougar Creek if
needed
New grant - projects TBD
BA moved to project number
Drayton archaeology
transferred to have trackable project number
Acquisition portion of Commerce grant: '23: Tilton,
Johnson and Lenz?
Tetratech contract balance
Included in other acquistion line item for 2023
2023 YE is CA +'23 amendment for 30-60 %;
2024 budgeted amt is for amendment to 90%
R&E contract balance; '19-21 FbD rev
USACE refund
Assumes Roads pays 50%; Amended in 22 for
phase 2, CA'd into 2023; need BA for balance
NHC contract balance; rev from Roads
2023 revenues are for design contract only. No
grant identified for 2024 yet. Const. in 2025
R&E contract balance; '19-21 FbD rev
1 M
Pass-through21-23FbD funding to Nooksack Tribe
for integrated fish -flood project: Tribe to provide
grant match (not included in WRIP)
Dahlberg Wetland Mitigation Site (719006)
Wetland plan development $ 15,000 2022 cost for data collection and RFP; 2023 is
data collection
Exhibit A
Flood Control Zone District
2024 Flood Program Budget
Work Plan and Supporting Documentation
Jones Creek Deflection Berm
Berm and bridge design
Land/easement acquisition
Construction
Transferred for capital program shortfall
High Creek Sediment Management
Sediment trap maintenance (720005)
CA
Glacier -Gallup Creek Alluvial Fan Restoration (718007)
Outreach
Preliminary design
Int Project construct - Transferred for anticipated project
shortfall
Land/easement acquisition
TOTAL
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ 7,500 $ 25,000
$ 4,000 $ 5,000
$ 18,000 $ 20,000
$ -
$ 100,000
$ 34,400
$ 43,000
$ 432,000
$ 540,000
$ 480,000
$ 600,000
$ 18,163,913
$ 20,619,039
$ (2,455,126)
2022BA inc CA and $75k supplement; design not
under grant but rev are 30% from Roads
Assumes Bassir in 2022 and Franklin in 23
Revenues: 20% Acme Water Dist for watermain,
20% Roads for road realingment work, 80% FbD
Integrated into specific items above
CA'd into 23; BA for balance in 24 rev are'19 FbD
New BA for 140K contract balance + contract for
30% design
for project implementation
Exhibit A
Flood Control Zone District
2024 Natural Resources Budget
Work Plan and Supporting Documentation
Natural Resources (169119)
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues
Expenditures
NATURAL RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION
Staff
$ 531,346
Office and operating
$ 379,835
TOTAL
$ -
$ 911,181
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ (911,181)
TOTAL FOR COST CENTER
$ -
$ 911,181
$ 911,181
Aquatic Invasive Species (169120)
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues
Expenditures
AIS ADMINISTRATION
Staff
$
$
Office and operating
$
TOTAL
$
$
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$
AIS OPERATIONS
Coordination and Planning
Interlocal Agreement (COB)
$
$ 170,826
Enforcement
$ 20,000
$ 40,000
AIS online education program website maintenance
$ -
$ 20,000
TOTAL
$ 20,000
$ 230,826
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ (210,826)
TOTAL FOR COST CENTER
$ 20,000
$ 230,826
$ 210,826
Water Planning (169121)
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues
Expenditures
WATER PLANNING ADMINISTRATION
Staff
$ 6,432
$ 154,390
Program Specialist
$ 140,656
Office and operating
$ 550
TOTAL
$ 6,432
$ 295,596
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ (289,164)
WATER PLANNING OPERATIONS
Coordination and Planning
Drainage -Based Management
$ 50,000
Watershed Planning Administrative Support
$ 40,000
Whatcom Groundwater Model
$ 100,000
LIO administration
$ 118,568
$ 118,568
Stream Gauging
$ 140,000
Water Settlement Initiative
$ -
$ -
Continuing Appropriations
Domestic Water Use Effeciency Program
$ -
TOTAL
$ 118,568
$ 448,568
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
$ (330.000)
TOTAL FOR COST CENTER
$ 125,000
$ 744,164
$ 619,164
AS Rs
Assumptions/Notes
Includes salary for 4.5 FTEs and overtime.
ASR Subtotal Budget Code 119 $
Assumptions/Notes
Misc. Expenses
Contribution to City for AIS Program;
Interdepartmental Agreement with WCSO
Contracted services for online
ASR Subtotal Budget Code 120 $
Assumptions/Notes
Watershed Planner+ LIO Labor
Property/Restoration Manager
Drainage -Based Management
Watershed Planning Administrative Support
Whatcom Groundwater Model
Administration of LIO process
USGS Stream Monitoring/AESI GW
Monitoring Contracts
Collaborative Process to Resolve Water
Issues $ 750,000
Domestic Water Use Effeciency Program
$ 35,000
ASR Subtotal Budget Code 121 $ 785,000
Exhibit A
Flood Control Zone District
2024 Natural Resources Budget
Work Plan and Supporting Documentation
Climate Action (169122)
CLIMATE ACTION ADMINISTRATION
Staff
Office and operating
TOT,
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALAN,
CLIMATE ACTION OPERATIONS
Coordination and Planning
Climate Vulnerability Assessment
Continuing Appropriation
TOT,
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALAN,
TOTAL FOR COST CENTI
Marine Resource Committee (169123) - 813001
Marine Resources Committee
Staff
MRC restoration projects
TOT,
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANi
TOTAL FOR COST CENTI
Water Quality (169124) - 813002
Water Quality/Pollution Identification & Correction
Program Coordination
Water Quality Monitoring
Data Management
Technical Assistance
Community Outreach
Incentives
Compliance
TOTAL
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE
TOTAL FOR COST CENTER
Salmon Recovery (169125) - 823004
Salmon Recovery
Staff
Restoration effectiveness monitoring, adaptive
management, and stewardship
Maintaining existing restoration projects*
New restoration projects*
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues Expenditures
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues Expenditures
$ 124,000 $ 122,202
$ - $ 14,659
$ 124,000 $ 136,861
$ (12,861)
$ 124,000 $ 136,861
$ 12,861
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues Expenditures
$ 2,854 $ 156,829
$ 7,000 $ 289,534
$ 129,428 $ 129,428
$ 254,574 $ 254,574
$ 62,810 $ 247,465
$ 45,000 $ 66,000
$ 113,545 $ 113,545
$ 615,211 $ 1,257,375
$ (642,164)
$ 615,211 $ 1,257,375
$ 642,164
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues Expenditures
$ 257,240
$ 72,630
$ 108,945
$ 30,000
Assumptions/Notes
Misc. Expenses
Climate Vulnerability Assessment
Sea Level Rise $50,000 supporting 2nd
round of Shoreline Planning Competitive
Grant
$ 50,000
ASR Subtotal Budget Code 122 $ 50,000
Assumptions/Notes
0.95 FTE $ 77,081
Expenses
ASR Subtotal Budget Code 123
$ 77,081
Assumptions/Notes
Program Coordination (1 FTE)
Sampling personnel, lab contract, one
vehicle, equipment (1 FTE + extra help)
WCD Data Management
WCD Farm Planners
Outreach staff, WCD staff, supplies
OSS and small farm cost share
PDS Staff
ASR Subtotal Budget Code 124 $
Assumptions/Notes
1 FTE
WCC crew restoration activities
WCC crew contract for maintaining
previously planted projects
Contracted services for activities supporting
planting, fencing, culvert replacement, etc.
TOTAL $ - $ 468,815
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE $ (468,815)
TOTAL FOR COST CENTER $ - $ 468,815 ASR Subtotal Budget Code 125 $
$ 468,815
*Integrated Salmon Recovery/Flood Hazard Reduction capital and planninq projects appear under budqet code 114 and 104.
Exhibit A
Flood Control Zone District
2024 Natural Resources Budget
Work Plan and Supporting Documentation
Lake Whatcom (169126) - 823005
Coordination and Planning
Lake Whatcom Homeowner Incentive Program
WSU Extension outreach services
TOTAL $
NET IMPACT TO FUND BALANCE $
TOTAL FOR COST CENTER $
Proposed 2024 Budget
Revenues Expenditures
$ 62,249
$ 25,000
- $ 87,249
(87,249)
87,249
87,249
Assumptions/Notes
Staff time only (0.5 FTE)
ASR Subtotal Budget Code 126 $
Net ASR Subtotal Budget Codes 119-126 $ 912,081
Tomberg
Family
Philanthropies
Nooksack River
Stewards Program
2023 — South Fork Summary Report
WRIA 1 Salmon Recovery Lead Entity
Itf
J�\�E4 STgT�s
State ofo"of Q GEO
S - The
4Vashrngton Stale Deparimenl of D2p81'IR1211t of � Z
i*Health m Quai+i ���,o= INSTITUTE "WrLnEAA FreshwaterTrust
yTaC PROZ�G� GUARDIANS
South Fork
pton M: _, ey,� _=� • Outreach Booth
.4
Nooksack q'Y p hSaple F Its ti
son Kendal'
Y� • 542 Data Collection
�- -
Monitoring
on Lawrence.
hiugents`-�F' fr ► -
Darner ,e o: ,�' �y • C o m m u n i t
DeMiino g
SurveYs
.r Van ZanZt
t Saner
tires r Prioritized collecting information that
NSEA Nooksack DNR and Whatcom
County wanted to know.
3 L F
The Team
9 paid interns & 2 full-time staff
• Training
• Difficult conversations
and debunking
misinformation
• Nooksack Natural
Resources supported
with a field trip to South
Fork
• Schedule
• Balance between
positive and negative
programming
f:
Survey
Data Areas
Timelapse Cameras
• Set up in two sections downstream of Acme Bridge
• near Strand Rd (private property)
• halfway between Strand and Potter (WLT)
• Considerations:
• Valuable data on recreation use and river traffic
• Maintenance and processing is time-consuming
• Ethical data collection and risk of loss
ql.414nwic2 cr-A r
N9Id 5craeblo Fa0e L}bv� •
f
,' papas Iry
Van Zandt
Clipper
Standard
3
a
a
Comar
Acme
NaoksaQk Rirer
Psrk
� 4
r
�
Monitoring a n d Data Collection Am
� ■ � �: ���\�
-
.
: •( � � ■, .
-
AF
-.�-
�
-
� 2�
`��
500
450
I
350
O
300
250
V
�
200
, 150
H
100
50
0
Total Daily Recreators - Downstream
i e,%rni 4� - - - -
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N rq N N N N N N N N N N N N fV fV f-J N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N
M Ln r- M rH M Ln r M M Ln r M M Lnr- Mr --I N�(�D 00 O N (�D 00 O N�L.D 00 o rH M Ln
N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ r-H r -I r-I r-I r-I N N N N N M \ \ \ \ v -I r-I r-I r-I r-H N N N N N M \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ I- r- r- r- r- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 00 00 00 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ al Ql Ql
QO lD lD lD QO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
1200
1000
-91
.Me
M
200
J]
Total Recreators by DoW (6/21-9/5) - Downstream
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
6/21-7/24 7/25-9/5
Friday Saturday Sunday
70
11
50
W]
30
all
10
Log Jam Interactions
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
N N N N N N N cV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
r -I M In r� M r -I M if N Q\l r -I M Ln r� M r -I M In r� M r -I N lc* l\D 0000 O N It l\O 0000 O N \Cf lD 0000 O r -I M LI
\ \ \ \ \ N N N N n \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 00 00 00 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ M M M
lD lD lZ lZ IZ r- r- r- n n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
• Other data collected (at Acme
Bridge)
• Water temperature and turbidity
• Daily recreation weekend trends
• Dog presence (estimate roughly
80-100 dogs over the summer)
• Fish presence
• Dead adults
• One unknown school
• Fry
• Sucker fish
Staffed Weeken
• 1,402 observed during staffed time
22%engaged (315 recreators)
• 41% surveyed (130 recreators)
• Difficult crowd to engage
Tubing/Fishing Comments
• Most interactions were positive/supportive of our educational presence
• Of the negative/more neutral interactions the most common were
about:
• Tubing Ban Confusion
• Why do we think tubing/floating is the biggest problem?
• Why is only tubing/floating banned?
• Fishing Misconceptions
• "If we cared about saving salmon, we would get the nets out of the river."
Where Surveyed Recreators are From
Outside Whatcom
31%
Whatcom:
Bellingham
35%
Whatcom: Other
17% Whatcom: Acme
17%
I
a,r:irrrr:
Elif5 PtUo-i!h -rJ?
r{' f Of �
Vancouver
Nanaimp Rich rrey
g�[FIaMn�Wckf
Delta—
r ' Ab ots and J i
4
fifor+ra Cnscr+rres
' - 87 s �vfr0�+o1
ellirlgharr .43 Pprk
7 ■ Norlh c
a Not
s'
Peek Wd
' -- ' nrfodtl7f
E ttBaker 5rao�ua�mif
Nabancly
�` Forest �1
oiympic
NQuOtTai I-Iympu
Park 1woy;oFrQi'• 4
�u;n�rh Nof�anal,
+4cse�va�i�rr � Fvmt
k�r{ Tac Mal
k-
_ S
\.I,-
0 rnLIPIInE�L
Recreation Activity of Surveyed
Swimming
19%
Recreators Favorable to a Recreation
Permitting System for South Fork
Nooksack
Floating
55% Beaching No
23 % 21%
Other
3%
Maybe
16%
Recreators Opposed to
Permitting/Managing River
Activities
Outside
Whatcom Acme
& Skagit 25%
25%
Yes Other
63% Whatcom Bellingham
& Skagit 25%
25%
River Users Aware of Chinook in
the River
Awa re
30%
Unaware
70%
Who Manages Local Salmon
Fisheries?
Othe
6%
WDFW
/Abs and Tribes
15%
Tribes
10%
WDFW
20%
I Don't Know
48%
Guess how many Nooksack River
wild Chinook the Nooksack Tribe
harvested in 2022
Ove r
1,000
33%
500-
1,000
23%
Less
than 10
11%
10-100
17%
100-500
14%
Many answered in the tens
to hundreds of thousands...
What D❑ Recreators View as the Biggest Threat to Local Salmon
Assumptions:
• The options probably go% Natural
Predation
swayed participant
64%
answers 60% Hatchery
• Pollution sounds bad Programs
so was easily listed as 43�� Harvesting
.�� Access to Healthy
a threat versus a true 30% Stormwater Freshwater
understanding of that 21%
27 Pollution Habitat
issue
-23% -27-24%
%a
-43%
50%
-53%
Least Harmful Second Least Middle Second Most w Most Harmful
60%
49%
40% 37%
20% I R
0%
Healthy Habitat
-zo% for Salmon
-40%
-60%
-80
How do River Uses Rank Outdoor Values
32% 32%
■
Water Quality
for People
1
Future Access to
Salmon
20%
-44%
Future Access to
Recreation
■M1
-19%
-58%
Access to
Recreation
0 Most Important 0 Second Most . Middle Second Least 0 Least Important
280 gallons (263 lbs.)
.MOTM
Most contents were recyclable and came from Strand Rd
Recommendations
• Address lack of awareness:
• NSEA supported programming — positive and diverse
ways to celebrate the river and connect with the
community (year-round)
• Additional educational signage at bridge (permanent)
and Strand Rd beach (temporary/summer)
• Address lack of understanding:
• Collaboration on outreach materials about local
salmon fisheries, management, and human impacts
• Continued outreach and education along this area of
river during high -use times
• Address secondary issues:
• Trash collection
• Dog waste station
Balancing Salmon Recovery, Fisheries,
& Tribal Rights in Whatcom County
Suspect
poaching?
Report It
WDFW
www.wdfw.wa.gov/about/enforcernent/report
Nooksack
nooksacktribe.org/departments/law-enforcement/
Lummi
(360) 312-2274
tacn co -manager in our area nas resources aeaicaLea to the
proper enforcement ofthe set fishing regulations. If you suspect
poaching,you can easily report whatyou see to these entities.
• * * History of Fisheries Management* * -
The Point Elliot Treaty (18SS) secured tribal rights to fish from usual and accustomed areas.
When these rights were being ignored and refused by the state, the 1974 U.S, v. Washington
Supreme Court ruling (Roldt Decision) re -affirmed the western Washington tribes' treaty -
reserved fishing rights. After this ruling which also established the state and tribes as co -
managers of the fisheries, the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission was created to
coordinate and assist member tribes in their role as natural resource managers. Each year
tribal, state and federal fishery managers gather to plan the in -river and ocean, recreational and
commercial salmon fisheries in the region north of Cape Falcon, Oregon. This series of
government -to -government meetings in March and April is known as the North of Falcon
process. The purpose is to ensure salmon conservation objectives, tribal sharing obligations,
and international treaty agreements are met.
... Why the Type of Salmon Makes a Difference * • •
There are two genetically different runs of Chinook salmon in the Nooksack River, early -run
(spring) and late -run (summer/fall). As spring runs continued to decline, they were closed in the
1980s. Co -managers agreed to introduce a hatchery bred, late -run Chinook stock to support
commercial and subsistence fishing. These fish generally return separately from other salmon
(temporally or spatially) and can be fished as a terminal fishery (complete harvest is the goal).
Sometimes in the late summer/early fall, river nets can be seen trying to catch all of the late -run
Chinook. as intended since spring Chinook will have already migrated past the open fishing
areas to their spawning grounds which are closed. When late -run Chinook return to an area
with no spring -run stocks, for example Whatcom Creek, the same method of fishing with the
goal of harvesting the run in its entirety is employed.