HomeMy WebLinkAboutord2022-014�C 0" Co
P y
�L,9SHt N�,'CO�
File ID: AB2021-420
File Created: 07/14/2021
Department: Planning and
Development Services
Department
Assigned to: Council
Agenda Date: 02/22/2022
Whatcom County
Agenda Bill Master Report
File Number: AB2021-420
COUNTY COURTHOUSE
311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105
Bellingham, WA 98225-4038
(360) 778-5010
Version: 1 Status: Adopted
Entered by: JFieisch@co.whatcom.wa.us
File Type: Ordinance Requiring a Public Hearing
Primary Contact Email: jfleisch@co.whatcom.wa.us
TITLE FOR AGENDA ITEM:
Final Action: 02/22/2022
Enactment #: ORD 2022-014
Ordinance amending the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Map and zoning code for the
Nooksack Falls Exclave within the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest
SUMMARY STATEMENT OR LEGAL NOTICE LANGUAGE:
A Comprehensive Plan Map amendment and zoning code amendment for the Nooksack Falls Exclave
within the Mount Baker- Snoqualmie National Forest. The proposed map amendment will amend the
Mineral Resource Lands Comprehensive Plan Designation to Rural Forestry, to match the zoning
district. The zoning code amendment will include the Nooksack Falls Exclave as an area where a
Conditional Use Permit application may be submitted for facilities intended to provide education related
to forestry, natural resources and wildlife, and the purpose of the Rural Forestry zone. The proposal
affects approximately 66 acres of privately held lands on/near Wells Creek Road, off of State Route
542 - Mt. Baker Hwy, Assessor's Parcel Numbers 400831580150, 400831450200, 390806550550.
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE FILE
Date: Acting Body: Action: Sent To:
07/27/2021 Council INTRODUCED FOR PUBLIC Council
HEARING
Aye: 7 Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, Elenbaas, Frazey, and Kershner
Nay: 0
Absent: 0
Whatcom County Page 1 Printed on 212312022
Agenda Bill Master Report Continued (AB2021-4M
08/10/2021
Council
HEARD PUBLIC
TESTIMONY
08/10/2021
Council
FORWARDED FOR Council
CONCURRENT REVIEW
Aye:
7
Browne, Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, Elenbaas, Frazey, and Kershner
Nay:
0
Absent:
0
02/08/2022
Council
INTRODUCED
Aye:
7
Buchanan, Byrd, Donovan, Elenbaas, Frazey, Galloway, and Kershner
Nay:
0
Absent:
0
02/22/2022
Council
ADOPTED
Aye:
6
Buchanan, Donovan, Elenbaas, Frazey, Galloway, and Kershner
Nay:
0
Absent:
0
Abstain:
1
Byrd
Attachments: Agenda Bill Master Report, Staff Memo, Proposed Ordinance, Staff Report
Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 212312022
SPONSORED BY: Planning
PROPOSED BY: Planning
INTRODUCTION DATE: 2/8/2022
ORDINANCE # 2022-014
AN AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP FOR THE
APPROXIMATELY 66-ACRE NOOKSACK FALLS EXCLAVE WITHIN THE MOUNT BAKER
SNOQUALMIE NATIONAL FOREST, AND AMENDMENT TO THE RURAL FORESTRY
ZONING CODE TO INCLUDE THE NOOKSACK FALLS EXCLAVE AS AN AREA WHERE
CERTAIN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED.
WHEREAS, an application has been submitted by AVT Consulting to amend
the Comprehensive Plan Map to change the Mineral Resource Land (MRL)
designation to Rural Forestry for the approximately 66-acre Nooksack Falls Exclave
within the Mount Baker Snoqualmie National Forest, and to amend the Rural
Forestry zoning code to include the Nooksack Falls Exclave as an area where a
Conditional Use Permit application may be submitted for facilities intended to
provide education related to forestry, natural resources and wildlife, and the
purpose of the Rural Forestry zone.
WHEREAS, the site is located on Wells Creek Road, off Mt. Baker Highway
(SR 542), roughly 7 miles east of the town of Glacier. The proposal is situated within
portions of Section 31, T40N, R8E and Section 6, T39N R8E W.M. Assessor's Parcel
#'s 400831580150, 400831450200, and 390806550550; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment has been reviewed under the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria for
comprehensive plan amendments, as required by Whatcom County Code (WCC)
22.10.060; and
WHEREAS, notice of the Whatcom County Planning Commission hearing on
the proposed amendment was published in the Bellingham Herald, mailed and
posted; and
WHEREAS, the Whatcom County Planning Commission held a public hearing
on the proposed amendment and considered all testimony, and recommended
approval; and
WHEREAS, the Whatcom County Planning Commission forwarded its findings
and reasons for action to the County Council; and
WHEREAS, the County Council held a public hearing on the proposed
amendment and considered all testimony; and
WHEREAS, the County Council has adopted the following findings of fact and
conclusions:
P. 1
An application for comprehensive plan map amendment and zoning code
amendment was received by Whatcom County on December 31, 2019.
2. A determination of non -significance (DNS) was issued under the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) on April 23, 2021. The associated comment
period ended May 7, 2021. The associated appeal period ended May 17, 2021
3. On April 26, 2021, a comment was submitted by the Lummi Nation, as an
affected tribe, requesting that consultation be conducted. Consultation did not
occu r.
4. Notice of the Planning Commission hearing was posted at the subject site on
June 22, 2021.
5. Notice of the Planning Commission hearing was mailed to surrounding
property owners within 2,000' of the subject parcel on June 11, 2021.
6. Notice of the Planning Commission hearing was published in the Bellingham
Herald on June 25, 2021.
7. Notice of the proposed amendment was sent to the Department of Commerce
on May 25, 2021.
8. On May 25, 2011 the Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt of the
notice, and that a copy of the notice had been forwarded to other state
agencies.
9. The Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan does not contain specific criteria
for de -designating Mineral Resource Lands.
10. The Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan contains specific criteria for
designating Mineral Resource Lands.
11. The subject site does not meet Designation Criteria for Mineral Resource
Lands of long term commercial significance.
12. Mineral resource designation criterion #1 states "Non-metallic deposits must
contain at least one million cubic yards of proven and extractable sand,
gravel, or rock material per new MRL Designation." The site is highly
constrained by its parcel configuration, hydroelectric power -plant
infrastructure, a single family residence, the Mt. Baker Highway, a national
forest road, the North Fork of the Nooksack River (Shoreline Designation),
and Wells Creek (Shoreline Designation). Staff estimates that roughly 15
acres, over multiple mining areas, might be able to be mined while avoiding
these constraints. These 15 acres would require mining to a depth of 40-45
feet with sheer vertical walls in order to meet this volume threshold. It has
not been demonstrated that the bedrock deposit contains one million cubic
yards of proven and extractable material, therefore it has not been
P. 2
demonstrated that this designation criterion has been met.
13. Mineral resource designation criterion #2 states "Minimum MRL Designation
size is twenty acres." The present MRL is greater than twenty acres.
Therefore, staff finds that this designation criterion has been met.
14. Mineral resource designation criterion #3 states "Expansion of an existing
MRL does not need to meet criteria 1 or 2." The proposal is not for expansion
of an existing MRL. This criterion is not applicable.
15. Mineral resource designation criterion # 4 states "MRL Designation status
does not apply to surface mines permitted as an accessory or conditional use
for the purpose of enhancing agriculture or facilitating forestry resource
operations." The subject site does not contain a surface mine permitted for
agricultural or forestry operations. This criterion is not applicable.
16. Mineral resource designation criterion #5 states "All pre-existing legal
permitted sites meeting the above criteria (criteria 1-4) will be designated."
The subject site does not contain a pre-existing legal permit for bedrock
extraction. This criterion is not applicable.
17. Mineral resource designation criterion #6 states "The site shall have a proven
resource that meets the following criteria:
• Construction material must meet WSDOT Standard Specifications for
common borrow criteria for road, bridge and municipal construction, or
Whatcom County standards for other uses.
• Sand and gravel deposits must have a net to gross ratio greater than
80% (1290 cy/acre/foot)."
The subject proposal affects a bedrock unit that would be unlikely to meet
either of these criteria, unless it was crushed and processed. This criterion
appears to be written for a sand and gravel deposit that meets these
requirements in -situ. A bedrock unit would not meet the requirements in -situ.
Therefore staff finds that this designation criterion has not been met.
18. Mineral resource designation criterion #7 states 'MRL Designations must not
be within nor abut developed residential zones or subdivisions platted at
urban densities." The subject site is zoned Rural Forestry and is surrounded
by the Mount Baker Snoqualmie National Forest. Therefore, staff finds that
this designation criterion has been met.
19. Mineral resource designation criterion #8 states 'MRL Designations must not
occur within the 10 year zone of contribution for designated wellhead
protection areas, as approved by the State Department of Health for Group A
systems, and by the Whatcom County Health Department for Group B
systems, in accordance with source control provisions of the regulations on
water system comprehensive planning. MRL designations may be modified if
a wellhead protection area delineated subsequent to MRL designation
encompasses areas within a designated MRL. If a fixed radii method is used
to delineate a wellhead protection area, the applicant may elect to more
precisely delineate the wellhead protection boundary using an analytical
model; provided, that the delineated boundary proposed by the applicant is
P. 3
prepared by a professional hydrogeologist; and further provided, that the
delineated boundary has been reviewed and approved by the Washington
State Department of Health for Group A systems, and by the Whatcom
County Health Department for Group B systems. The hydrogeologist shall be
selected by mutual agreement of the County, water purveyor, and applicant;
provided, if agreement cannot be reached, the applicant shall select a
consultant from a list of no less than three qualified consultants supplied by
the County and water purveyor." The subject site is not located within a
designated wellhead protection area of any public water system. Therefore,
staff finds that this designation criterion has been met.
20. Mineral resource designation criterion #9 states "MRL Designation should not
enclose by more than 50% non -designated parcels." There are no neighboring
parcels. The property is surrounded by National Forest Land. Therefore, staff
finds that this designation criterion has been met.
21. Mineral resource designation criterion #10 states: "Site -specific MRL
designations shall only be approved after mineral extraction impacts have
been anticipated and evaluated, and potential adverse environmental impacts
have been addressed through appropriate mitigation and/or reasonable
alternatives." Mineral extraction impacts have not been anticipated and
evaluated, and potential adverse environmental impacts have not been
addressed. Therefore, staff finds that this designation criterion has not been
met.
22. Mineral resource designation criterion #11 states "MRL Designations must be
reviewed for internal consistency with other parts of the comprehensive plan
so that the MRL designation does not preclude achievement of other parts of
the comprehensive plan." Consistent with RCW 36.70A.320(1), the present
designation is presumed valid and does not preclude achievement of other
parts of the comprehensive plan. Therefore, staff finds that this designation
criterion has been met.
23. Mineral resource designation criterion #12 states "Expansion of MRL
Designations to parcels contiguous to, and held by more than 1% common
beneficial ownership or beneficial interest with an existing mine is allowed, but
before extraction of the additional area may commence the existing mine
must be in complete compliance with all operating permits and regulations."
The proposed amendment is not an expansion of an MRL designation. This
criterion is not applicable.
24. Mineral resource designation criterion #13 is specific to designated urban and
rural areas, and therefore not applicable.
25. Mineral resource designation criterion #14 states "Must demonstrate higher
value as mineral resource than forestry resource based upon.
• soil conditions
• quality of mineral resource
• sustainable productivity of forest resource
It has not been demonstrated that the site has a higher value as a mineral
resource than a forestry resource. Soil data for the site is not available
P. 4
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey. Therefore, staff finds that this
designation criterion has not been met.
26. Mineral resource designation criterion #15 is specific to designated
agricultural areas, and therefore is not applicable.
27. Mineral resource designation criterion #16 is specific to river and stream
gravel, and therefore is not applicable.
28. Mineral resource designation criterion #17 is specific to river and stream
gravel, and therefore is not applicable.
29. Mineral resource designation criterion #18 states "For metallic and rare
minerals, mineral designation status extends to all patented mining claims."
The site was designated MRL as a result of patented mining claims. Therefore,
staff finds that this designation criterion has been met.
30. Mineral resource designation criterion #19 states "Mineral Resource
Designation status extends to all currently permitted industrial mineral
deposits of long-term commercial significance." The site does not contain
industrial minerals, therefore this criterion is not applicable.
31. Mineral resource designation criterion #20 states "All other non -patented
mineral deposits must meet the non-metallic MRL Designation criteria
numbers 6 through 15, as applicable." The site was designated MRL as a
result of patented mining claims, therefore this criterion is not applicable.
32. In addition to the criteria for designating MRLs, the Whatcom County
Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies that are applicable to the
proposal.
33. Policy 8G-2: Provide appropriate land use regulations for the diverse forest
resource lands within the county through the designation of Rural Forestry
and Commercial Forestry zones.
Land use regulations for the property are administered by the Whatcom
County Zoning Code, specifically the Rural Forestry Zoning District. Presently
the comprehensive Plan designation of Mineral Resource Lands (MRL) is not
consistent with the zoning designation of Rural Forestry (RF), leading to
unpredictability and inconsistency during review of discretionary permits.
Amending the Comprehensive Plan designation from MRL to RF to match the
zoning district is appropriate. Consideration of changing the MRL designation
to RF appears to be supported by this policy.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the approval criteria of WCC
22.10,060.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Whatcom County Council that
the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan map is hereby amended from Mineral
P. 5
Resource Lands (MRL) to Rural Forestry as shown in Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Whatcom County Council that
the Whatcom County Zoning Code is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit B.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that if any section, subsection, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional; such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it would have passed this code
and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases has
been declared invalid or unconstitutional, then the original ordinance or ordinances
shall be in full force and effect.
AI�CSF�hls 22n�c_ day ofFebruary , 2022
' A� , a` C 01i WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
ATTEST `: WHAT OM OUNTY, WASHINGTON
Dana�Brovn-pavi$,l'e rk of the Council T dd Dono an, Cou Chair
WHATCOM COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/ Royce Buckingham, approved electronically
Royce Buckingham
Executive Civil Deputy Prosecutor
P. 6
WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON
S4744t ��
Satpal Sidhu, County
XApproved ( ) Denied
Date Signed: ZI?�uI22-
Exhibit A
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
Comprehensive Plan/Zoning
PLN2020-00004 - Rural Forestry Designation and Text Amendment
Comprehensive Plan Designation - Mineral Resource Lands (MRL)
to Rural Forestry for approximately 66 acres in the Nooksack Falls
exclave
Comprehensive Plan
Subject Parcel = MRL
Existing Zoning
0 10a 2W ew 6?J fiC9
Exhibit B
Title 20 Zoning Amendments
Chapter 20.42
RURAL FORESTRY (RF) DISTRICT
20.42.150 Conditional Uses
.155 The operation of facilities intended to provide education related to forestry,
natural resource and wildlife and the purpose of this district, including but not
limited to demonstration forests and conservation laboratories, educational meeting
facilities and related uses including rental cabins or other lodging structures,
cooking and dining facilities, retail sales or meeting supplies and gifts, in the
Foothills Subarea, South Fork Valley, the Newhalem Exclave, the Baker Lake
Exclave, and the Nooksack Falls Exclave, provided the following standards are met:
(1) Density shall not exceed one sleeping unit per one gross acre or a maximum
for 50 beds for the entire development.
(2) Each cabin shall have a maximum of three sleeping units.
(3) Must be located with vehicular access fronting on paved county roads or
private roads improved to county standards.
(4) Front yard setback shall be 75 feet, with 100-foot side and rear yard
setbacks to adjacent properties.
(5) Lot coverage for all facilities, including the rental cabins, shall not exceed 20
percent, clustered on no more than 50 percent of the property.
Exhibit C
SEPA Threshold Determination
SEPA Distribution List
WHATCOM COUNTY Mark Personius, AICP
Planning & Development Services Director
5280 Northwest Drive
Bellingham, WA 98226-9097
360-778-5900,TTY 800-833-6384
360-778-5901 Fax
SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
File: SEP2021-00038
Project Description: Amend Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan Map designation from
Mineral Resource Land to Rural Forestry, to match the zoning district. Amend Whatcom County
Code WCC 20.42.155 to include the Nooksack Falls Area Exclave.
Proponent: Excelsior Properties LLC & Excelsior Properties II LLC
Address and Parcel #: 12251 Mt Baker Highway / 400831580150, 400831450200 &
390806550550
Lead Agency: Whatcom County Planning & Development Services
Zoning: RF Comp Plan: MRL Shoreline Jurisdiction: Conservation
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that no significant adverse environmental
impacts are likely. This proposal will also be reviewed for compliance with all applicable
Whatcom County Codes (WCC) which regulates development activities, including but not
limited to: WCC 15 - Buildings and Construction, WCC 16.16 - Critical Areas, WCC 17 -
Flood Damage Prevention, WCC 20 - Zoning, WCC 21 - Land Division Regulations, WCC 23
- Shoreline Management Program, the Whatcom County Development Standards and/or the
Washington State Stormwater Manual. Mitigation may be a requirement of Whatcom County
Code. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not
required. This decision was made following review of a completed SEPA environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to
the public on request.
X Pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14
days from the date of issuance indicated below. Comments must be received by 4:00
p.m. on May 7, 2021 and should be sent to: Josh Fleischmann via email at
JFleisch@co.whatcom.wa.us
Responsible Official: Mark Personius, mpersoni@co.whatcom.wa.us
Title: Director
Telephone: 360-778-5937
Address: 5280 Northwest Drive
Bellingham, WA 98226
Date of Issuance: April 23, 2021 Signature:
An aggrieved agency or person may appeal this determination to the Whatcom County Hearing
Examiner. Application for appeal must be filed on a form provided by and submitted to the Whatcom
County Current Planning Division located at 5280 Northwest Drive, Bellingham, WA 98226, during the
ten days following the comment period, concluding May 17, 2021.
You should be prepared to make a specific factual objection. Contact Whatcom County Current
Planning Division for information about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) Page 1 of 1
PL4-83-005E REV February 2021
WHATCOM COUNTY Mark Personius, AICP
Planning & Development Services Director
5280 Northwest Drive
Bellingham, WA 98226-9097
360-778-5900,TTY 800-833-6384
360-778-5901 Fax
SEPA Distribution List
SEP2021-00038
Date of Issuance: April 23, 2021
Please review this determination. If you have further comments or questions,
phone the responsible official at (360) 778-5900. Please submit your response by
the comment date noted on the attached notice of determination.
WA State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation via email
Stephanie Jolivette, stephanie.jolivette@dahp.wa.gov
SEPA@dahp.wa.gov
SEPA Unit, WA State Department of Ecology, Olympia via email
sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov
WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife
Wendy D. Cole via email wendy.cole@dfw.wa.gov
WA State Department of Natural Resources via email
Rochelle Goss, sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov
Brenda Werden, Brenda.werden @dnr.wa.gov
SEPA Unit, WA State Department of Transportation, Burlington via email
Roland Storme, stormer@wsdot.wa.gov
Judy Johnson, JohnsJu@wsdot.wa.gov
Lummi Nation Natural Resources
Merle Jefferson, Sr. via email - merlej@lummi-nsn.gov
Tamela Smart - tamelas@lummi-nsn.gov
Nooksack Indian Tribe
George Swanaset, JR via email - george.swanasetir@nooksack-nsn.gov
Trevor Delgado via email - tdelgado@nooksack-nsn.gov
Skagit River System Cooperative
Nora Kammer via email - nkammer@skagitcoop,ora
WCFD #19 - Glacier
Fire Chief Ben Thompson via email - ben@morewoohoo.orq
Applicant
Ali Taysi via email - ali@avtplanning.com
Arch@westford.co
Other and/or Parties of Record
National Forest Service, Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Forest c/o Greta Smith via
email - gretchen.v.smith@usda.gov
SEPA Distribution List Page 1 of 1
PL4-83-005D Rev March 2021