HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Council Oct 20 2020Whatcom County
Council (Special)
COUNTY COURTHOUSE
311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105
Bellingham, WA 98225-4038
(360) 778-5010
Minutes - Final
VIRTUAL WORK SESSION (CHERRY POINT)
Tuesday, October 20, 2020
1PM
Virtual Meeting
COUNCILMEMBERS
Rud Browne
Barry Buchanan
Tyler Byrd
Todd Donovan
Ben Llenbaas
Carol Frazey
Kathy Kershner
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL
Dana Brown -Davis, C.M.C.
Council (Special) Minutes - Final October 20, 2020
Call To Order
Roll Call
Council Chair Barry Buchanan called the meeting to order at 1 p.m. in a
virtual meeting.
Present: 7 - Rud Browne, Barry Buchanan, Tyler Byrd, Todd Donovan, Carol Frazey, Ben
Elenbaas and Kathy Kershner
Absent: None
Discussion Item
1. AB2020-345 Discussion of proposed Cherry Point amendments
Eddy Ury, RE Sources, gave a history of the Joint Stakeholder's proposed
revisions to the Planning Commission's recommendations and introduced
the following signatory stakeholder participants:
• Pam Brady, BP
• Geoff Chalfont, BP
• Jim Verburg, BP
• Tim Johnson, Phillips 66
• Brad Brown, Philips 66
• Carl Perkins, Phillips 66
• Gavin Carscallen, Petrogas
• Andrew Gamble, Petrogas
• Alex Ramel, Stand.earth
• Anna Doty, Washington Environmental Council (WEC)/Washington
Conservation Voters (WCV)
• Trevor Smith, Laborers Local 292
Also attending the meeting:
• Carl Weimer, Pipeline Safety Trust
• Holli Johnson, Western States Petroleum Association
• Erin Strang, Phillips 66
Timestamp: 00:16:00
Ury updated the Councilmembers on behalf of all the stakeholders and
walked through proposed amendments from August 13, 2020 Planning
Commission Recommended Version (on file).
Timestamp: 00:39:53
Whatcom County Page / Printed on 1111212020
Council (Special) Minutes - Final October 20, 2020
He and the following people discussed with Councilmembers and answered
questions:
• Alex Ramel
• Geoff Chalfont
• Tim Johnson
• Andrew Gamble
• Trevor Smith
Timestamp: 01:17:32
Ury presented and summarized the Cherry Point Amendments
Joint -Stakeholder Revisions (attached) and the following people discussed
with Councilmembers and answered questions:
• Gavin Carscallen
• Alex Ramel
• Tim Johnson
• Pam Brady
• Geoff Chalfont
• Matt Aamot, Planning and Development Services Department
• Mark Personius, Planning and Development Services Department
Director
Timestamp: 03:15:00
Council Chair, Barry Buchanan, proceeded with facilitating the remainder
of the work session.
The following person discussed the proposed amendments with
Councilmembers and answered questions:
• Matt Aamot
Councilmembers discussed how they would like to vote on the document.
Councilmembers made several motions (below) and the following people
discussed them with Councilmembers and answered questions:
• Eddy Ury
• Tim Johnson
• Pam Brady
• Mark Personius
Whatcom County Page 2 Printed on 1111212020
Council (Special) Minutes - Final October 20, 2020
• Karen Frakes, Prosecuting Attorney's Office
• Dana Brown -Davis, Clerk of the Council
Timestamp: 03:33:26
Donovan moved to consider the stakeholder proposed revisions in the
Cherry Point Amendments Joint -Stakeholder Revisions document
individually, as highlighted in blue. The motion was seconded by Browne.
Councilmembers and the speakers discussed the motion and stakeholders
stated that they preferred that the revisions in the stakeholder document be
considered collectively.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Browne, Buchanan, Donovan, and Frazey
Nay: 1 - Byrd
Abstain: 1 - Elenbaas
Out of the Meeting: 1 - Kershner
Timestamp: 03:44:52
Browne moved to approve the changes as highlighted in blue in Section
20.68.068. The motion was seconded by Donovan.
Councilmembers discussed the motion.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Buchanan, Donovan, Frazey, and Browne
Nay: 0
Abstain: 2 - Byrd and Elenbaas
Out of the Meeting: 1 - Kershner
Timestamp: 03:48:28
Donovan moved to approve the changes as highlighted in blue in Section
20.68.153 (including Subsections A, B, and C but not including numbered
Subsections 1-10) with the correction of the word "it's" to "its." The
motion was seconded by Browne.
Councilmembers discussed the motion.
"Timestamp: 03:50:00
Browne moved to amend the motion to approve as above with the following
change:
C. Cumulatively increases 41s the maximum fossil fuel
Whatcom County Page 3 Printed on 1111212020
Council (Special) Minutes - Final October 20, 2020
*ant storage capacity of unrefined fossil fuels fr-em the
facility by more than 1-0,000 50,000 barrels (or 420,000 the
equivalent amount of gallons) per day.
The motion to amend failed for lack of a second.
Councilmembers continued to discuss Donovan's motion.
Donovan's motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Donovan, Elenbaas, Frazey, and Buchanan
Nay: 1 - Browne
Out of the Meeting: 2 - Kershner and Byrd
Timestamp: 04:00:25
Donovan moved to approve the changes as highlighted in blue in Subsection
three and proposed Subsection ten of Section 20.68.153, and the language
as highlighted in blue in Section 20.68.205. The motion was seconded by
Elenbaas.
Timestamp: 04:01:52
Browne suggested a friendly amendment to approve everything Donovan
just said with the exception of language under "Change of Use." Donovan
accepted, but then stated that his motion did not include the "Change of
Use" section and the definitions so Browne withdrew his friendly
amendment.
Councilmembers clarified Donovan's motion.
Donovan's motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Donovan, Elenbaas, Frazey, Browne, and Buchanan
Nay: 0
Out of the Meeting: 2 - Kershner and Byrd
Timestamp: 04:04:51
Elenbaas moved to approve the changes as highlighted in purple under
Section 20.68.150. The motion was seconded by Browne.
Councilmembers and Ury discussed the motion.
Timestamp: 04:09:00
Browne moved to amend the motion by adding language to the text
highlighted in purple as follows:
Wkntcom County pine 4 Printed on 1111212020
Council (Special) Minutes - Final October 20, 2020
Determination of "maximum transshipment capacity" under this
WCC 20.68.153, shall be the maximum capacity resulting from an
evaluation by a third -party licensed professional engineer, approved
by the Planning and Development Director of the facility's storage,
transfer, or shipment capacities and which may include, or be solely
based on, other transshipment limitations that can be demonstrated
by the applicant.
The motion was seconded by Donovan.
Councilmembers discussed the motion to amend with County staff and
Joint Stakeholder participants.
Elenbaas withdrew his motion to approve the changes as highlighted in
purple under Section 20.68.150 and Browne withdrew his second, so the
motion to amend was also withdrawn and was not voted on.
Councilmembers continued to discuss the item.
Timestamp: 04:23:1 1
Donovan moved to approve the definition of Fossil -Fuel Refinery as
revised with the changes highlighted in blue in Section 20.97.160.4. The
motion was seconded by Buchanan.
Councilmembers discussed the motion.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Browne, Buchanan, Donovan, Elenbaas, and Frazey
Nay: n
...7
Abstain: 1 - Byrd
Out of the Meeting: 1 - Kershner
Timestamp: 04:25:56
Donovan moved to approve the changes as highlighted in blue in Section
16.08.090 Subsection E, Section 20.97.052.1, and the line directly after
that Section starting with "'Change of use' means when a building...," but
not the changes in Section 20.74.115. The motion was seconded by
Browne.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Browne, Buchanan, Donovan, Elenbaas, and Frazey
Nay:
Abstain: 1 - Byrd
Whatcom County Paige 5 Printed on 1111212020
Council (Special) Minutes - Final October 20, 2020
Other Business
Adiournment
Out of the Meeting: I - Kershner
Timestamp: 04:28:55
Elenbaas `roved to accept the changes as highlighted in blue in Section
20.74.115. The motion was seconded by Donovan.
Councilmembers and meeting participants discussed the motion.
The motion failed by the following vote:
Aye: 2 - Byrd and Elenbaas
Nay: 4 - Buchanan, Donovan, Frazey, and Browne
Out of the Meeting: 1 - Kershner
Timestamp: 04:3 7:27
Elenbaas moved to schedule another work session after an undefined time
period after the stakeholders have met. The motion was seconded by Frazey.
Dana Brown -Davis, Clerk of the Council spoke about the availability of
meeting time and the deadline for introducing a new interim Ordinance.
Councilmembers discussed the motion.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Donovan, Elenbaas, Frazey, Browne, and Buchanan
Nay: 0
Abstain: 1 - Byrd
Out of the Meeting: 1 - Kershner
Buchanan thanked Ury and the other participants for their work.
This agenda item was DISCUSSED AND MOTION(S) APPROVED.
There was no other business.
The meeting adjourned at 5:44 p.m.
The County Council approved these minutes on November 10, 2020.
Whatcone County Page 6 Printed on 1111212020
Council (Special) ®�y�SffSlili93
(p ) ` llipp ates -Final October 20, 2020
g Ni .'R B
ATTF�
(�����" WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
WHATCOM COUNTY, WA
Dana Bfp�vn-Davi�,Vounc,j] Clerk�tuchanan, Council Chair
�1 �• �e�lb ► � o�Q/�l
Kristi Felbinger, Minutes
Whatcom County Page 7 Printed on 1111212020
Requesting consideration by Whatcom County Council on October 20th, 2020, authorized
representatives of the following parties have agreed that our respective interests would be
served by revising the Planning Commission's Aug 13t" draft of Cherry Point Amendments as
shown below:
III! pill
These revisions aim to address facility use changes that could be identified as conditional uses
or prohibited uses. In the Aug 131" draft code amendments, the definition of the term "Change of
Use" in WCC 20.97.052.1 does not meaningfully align with the term's apparent purpose in the
two clauses where it appears. We are proposing to remove the term from these code
amendments, and address its purpose through an alternative approach. Our collective request
for these revisions to the draft amendments should not be construed as support for adopting the
amendments into county code, nor does it indicate the full extent of revisions that respective
parties would like to see.
M
Council -proposed amendments
Planning Commission proposed revisions
Current unamended Whatcom County Code
Commentary or explanation
sX M
20.68.050 Permitted Uses [Heavy Impact Industrial District]
20.68.068 Existing fossil fuel refineries Fossil duel _ransshipment facilities, renewable fuel refineries,
�AQM# fr aaif1, i provided that a conditional use permit is not required by WCC 20.68.153,
uses includOM repairs, improvements, maintenance, modifications, remodeling or other changes
including but not limited to the following:
[numerated 1 - 22]
Note: Per proposed WCC 20.68.153, conditional use permits will be required when certain
cumulative capacity increases occur at a fossil fuel refinery or a fossil fuel transshipment
facility. To measure baselines and track cumulative increases, beginning with the first land use
permit sought after the effective date of the amended rule, a permittee shall provide the
following information and update the information provided upon every subsequent land use
permit application:
• Types of fuels or feedstock'
® Mode of shipment'
• Maximum transshipment capacity3
• Maximum atmospheric crude distillation capacity'
20.68.150 Conditional Uses
The following uses require a conditional use permit in the HII Zoning District
.153 Expansion of existing legal Fossil Fuel Refineries or expansion of existing legal Fossil Fuel
Transshipment Facilities. For purposes of this section, an expansion is any Fossil Fuel Refinery and/or Fossil
Fuel Transshipment Facility development (including otherwise permitted or accessory uses), vested after the
effective date of this ordinance that meets any one of the following �� . _ thresholds:
A. Cumulatively increases its maximum atmospheric crude distillation capacity of fossil fuels by
more than 10,000 barrels (or 420,000 gallons) per day based upon an evaluation of physical
equipment limitations conducted by a licensed professional engineer; or
B. Cumulatively increases "W maximum transshipment capacity i by more than
10,000 barrels (or 420,000 gallons) per day.
C. Cumulatively increases it''s maximum transshipment capacity of unrefined
fossil fuels from the facility by more than 10,000 barrels (or 420,000 gallons)
per day,
if a collditioilai use pei'i71I is obtaiiied, the baseline for determining the cumulative increases is reset.
Such expansions shall be subject to the conditional use criteria below:
(1) The conditional use permit approval criteria listed under WCC 20.84.220 are met;
(2) Within shorelines, if applicable, County approval shall be contingent upon approval of a shoreline permit;
i Disclosures cannot include trade secrets, i.e. locational origin of feedstock sources.
2 Shipment mode categorized generally i.e. tanker, barge, truck, unit train, etc.
3 This term is defined in the Aug 13t" draft code and disclosed calculations may incorporate the
throughput and capacity of multiple fuel production units.
4 a definition of "maximum transshipment capacity" has been discussed by stakeholders but have not
reached full consensus.
5 Petrogas proposed this definition. Particularly, "be solely based upon' raised concerns for Stand.
(3) The applicant has documented
and volumes of substances irah:
types,
s $r The permit shall be limited exclusively to
those types and volumes of materials or products as documented and approved.
(4) Insurance requirements meet the provisions of WCC Section 22.05.125.
(5) Mitigation of transportation impacts consistent with Chapter 20.78 WCC, Transportation Concurrency
Management, and Chapter 16.24 WCC, Commute Trip Reduction
(6) Mitigation of impacts to other services including fire and emergency response capabilities, water supply
and fire flow, to address risks created by expansions.
(7) Plans for stormwater and wastewater releases have been approved.
8) Prior to commencement of any site preparation or construction activities, all necessary state leases shall
be acquired for any piers or aquatic lands improvements, and it shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of
the zoning administrator that the project applicant has met any federal or state permit or consultation
requirements, including tribal treaty rights or the provisions of the Magnuson Amendment through state and
federal permitting decisions; and
(9) The County decision maker may approve a conditional use permit with a condition to obtain relevant
leases and complete any necessary federal and state permitting requirements, and may restrict the
conditional use permittee from undertaking site preparation or construction activities until it has fulfilled
that condition
20.68.200 Prohibited Uses
.205. New Fossil Fuel Transshipment Facilities; provided that, the following uses of facilities are not
prohibited(l)mterrefineryshipmentsa1tro�ft�t11,1?
��)��lppc����� (u) transferring Y ,���� `fit during emergency scenarios where
contingencies regwre '` „'� t)a tto be moved, and (iii) necessary „_
o pa transfers during turn-arounds or maintenance periods., including bulk s*eFageoi-
Note: We believe this change would satisfy the concerns expressed by Councilmembers about
this provision without functionally changing the intended effect of this provision. As we
understand it, any project that meets the codified definition of "New Fossil Fuel Transshipment
Facilities" would be prohibited outright, regardless of the three identified activities, but this
language serves to clarify that facilities which do not meet that definition would not be prohibited
from engaging in these activities to the extent that they do not meet the definition specified in
draft WCC 20.97.160.3.
6 Criteria (10) could be moved to fit within criteria (3) and/or be duplicated to be clear as to which
aforementioned disclosures are the permittee's responsibility to update the county on changes to after
approval of a CUP.
We suggest this change on the condition that satisfactory definitions of "refined products and
intermediate materials" be added, which we will submit accordingly if this suggestion is
accepted by Council.
"Intermediate Materials" refers to refined or partially refined products that are produced at a
refinery by processing crude oil and other petroleum -based feedstocks that can be further
processed to produce refined products or other blending components.
We are recommending the term "Fossil Fuels" in place of "petroleum products" in 20.68.205
because a specific definition for Fossil Fuels is already in place within the draft amendments
proposal, WCC 20.97.160.2. This definition may also warrant revisions to ensure the intended
meaning is appropriately captured. Stakeholders discussed possible changes but have not yet
reached consensus. Other definitions may also be worth revisiting in addition to the one below.
20.97 160.4 Fossil -Fuel Refinery
A "Fossil -Fuel Refinery" , a facility that -receives and converts into products
including but not limited to gasoline, distillates such as diesel fuel and heating oil, jet fuel, petrochemical
feedstocks, waxes, lubricating oils t wffioCf and asphalt
}oszel fZfzryae�tu include but are not limited to. bulk storage manufacturing or processing of
fossil fuels tpttt1 stfexlf or byproducts �1fTtI:�1t�t
_tabs. This definition excludes Small Fossil or Renewable Storage and Distribution Facilities.
t
SEPA Chapter: 16.08.090 Environmental checklist
E.... "For any proposed ti'~ ' ; expansion of facilities 1
}, , xfk Y rua-pzrf��t'z�x� rsr^r1r •- t *: �"�r z � ' i €, t; c. �,i �' � t i. � x.
e, the proponent will provide an expert evaluation or fill out the County's SEPA "Worksheet for Fossil
and Renewable Fuel Facilities." ...
definition]
Note: 20.74.115 would be inoperable as written and otherwise redundant to retain. Existing
Fossil Fuel Refineries would already be required to obtain CUPs for increasing their capacity to
refine crude oil. It should be clear that a standalone Renewable Fuel facility could not change its
use to what is barred in 20.68.200 for new facilities. If that meaning is not unequivocal enough
with the above additions included, it should be further clarified in the Prohibited Use section that
any existing facility cannot alter itself in such a way that it meets the definition of a new
prohibited facility. (Moreover, there is no generalized definition of "fossil fuel facilities" in the
code, and this clause appears to imply that a Renewable Fuel Refinery or a Renewable Fuel
Transshipment Facility could exist separately within the boundary of a Fossil Fuel Refinery,
which further convolutes the defined construct of a Refinery being defined as a singular facility
containing various interrelated structural units within its complex.
We've sought to remove ambiguities and equivocations of the term "facility" throughout the code
amendments to distinguish a cohesive intended meaning. To that end, we have made a point to
capitalize all terms that correspond to codified definitions. Any such instance where a
specifically defined term is uncapitalized should be understood as an error to be corrected.