HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Council February 9 1989r
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING IN POINT ROBERTS
February 9, 1989
The meeting was called to order at 7 :15 p.m. by Vice-Chairman Dan
Warner, with Council members Emily Jackson, Tom Burton, Corky Johnson, Will
Roehl, and Mary Vanderpol present; Chairman Hansey arrived at about 7 :30, but
did not take the gavel from Warner until about 8 :45, following a short recess.
Public hearings on the following two items were opened simultaneously by
Warner, since discussion of both was likely to overlap.
The Council's Clerk had distributed a note informing Council, of its options
(attached). It was noted by counsel that the conditional use ordinance could
not be acted upon immediately after the public hearing, because a special
meeting notice must note the type of action that will take place at the
meeting; although consideration is implied after public hearings in regular
meetings, at a special meeting the agenda needs to specifically state that an
item will be considered after a public hearing.
Emergency ordinance instituting a 30 -day moratorium on gas stations in Point
Roberts and
Ordinance establishing gas stations as a conditional use in Point Roberts
John L. Medbury
1926 Cliff Road
Said he doesn't want urban sprawl, although urbanization of some sort is
inevitable. County shouldn't sacrifice the area to profiteers, residents'
needs should be considered first.
Anne Medbury
1926 Cliff Road
Liked the natural setting of Point Roberts; doesn't want it destroyed.
Valerie Loreen
Point Roberts
Wants moratorium continued until area's comprehensive plan is in place.
Martin Keeley
Point Roberts
Urged more careful emergency planning for the area, said fire department
is inadequate in the event of a gas explosion or other related emergency.
Said tourism trade could drop off if strip development occurs.
Lola Loreen
Point Roberts
Chose to live in Point Roberts in spite of inconvenience, because like
natural beauty. Asked for no more gas stations until comp plan completed.
Marie Burns
Point Roberts
A U.S. resident; favored moratorium.
Minutes, 2/9/89, Page 2
Ruby White
1783 Edwards Drive
Point Roberts probably has more taverns than the local residents need;
is no Justification to limit their existence, same as with gas stations.
Following that sort of logic, Bellis Fair shouldn't be in Bellingham. Traffic
problems won't be solved with a moratorium.
Paul Ramport
Tswassen, B. C.
Represented Tswassen Property Owners Association; said traffic to Point
Roberts is a problem for B.C., as well. Supported any move that would reduce
traffic through Point Roberts.
Bob Tull
Bellingham Attorney
Represented the anti-moratorium faction. Presented a petition urging
Council to reject the moratorium. Said emergency moratoriums are an
inappropriate tool to deal with Point Roberts' problems.
Syd Wallace
Point Roberts
Spoke at length about the issue, listing relative statistics, etc. Said
County revenues could be hurt by a moratorium, Point Roberts will never be
self-supporting if such things continue. Hinted that the area may eventually
become incorporated. More gas stations don't mean more traffic; border is
saturated at its present level.
Bob Tull
Went through the proposed conditional use ordinance, suggesting changes
to its content. He said Point Roberts should not be singled out, that the
same standards and restrictions should be applied to other areas of the
county.
Jackson asked if people understand what they were signing when Tull's
petition was circulated? Did they have accurate information about the issue?
Tull said he assumed that most people got their informatlon from the
press.
Russ Allinson
Point Roberts
Showed a video tape of traffic in Point Roberts. Said people behind the
moratorium are not anti - development.
The meeting was recessed briefly, until 8:38 p.m. Chairman Hansey led
the remainder of the meeting.
Hansey explained that the Council could act on the 30 -day moratorium,
extending it for 60 -days if it wanted.
Pamela Coreya (name inaudible; didn't sign in)
Point Roberts
Said the one-year moratorium isn't legal. She is a real estate agent.
(inaudible name, and no record because of tape flip)
Said more and more permanent residents are coming to Point Roberts.
Minutes, 2/9/89, Page 3
Ken Etler (name inaudible; didn't sign in)
Point Roberts
Said people over 50 are behind the moratorium, that young people need
the Jobs generated by gas stations in order to make a living in Point Roberts.
Stephanie Loss (name inaudible; didn't sign in)
Point Roberts
Said the issue is human life; doesn't know if health, safety and welfare
of residents will be protected if gas stations allowed to proliferate. Urged
the temporary moratorium be extended so the county has time to consider this.
Donna Dawn (name inaudible; didn't sign in)
Point Roberts
Doesn't want row upon row of gas stations.
John Liefring
Dogwood Way
Urged Council to have some fortitude, and institute the moratorium.
Adriana Bettis
Point Roberts
Said she isn't anti-development, Just realistic; more gas stations
aren't needed at Point Roberts.
Jack Fraser
Point Roberts
is a fireman. Said no pro-moratorlum folks have been to any fire
district meetings. If more residents Joined the fire department, could be
better prepared for an emergency. Defended the department's record.
Frank Peltier
54 Peltier Drive
Said young people leave rapidly because there is no development at Point
Roberts. Called them an endangered species. Said it's okay to put a lid on
gas stations, but don't stop all development.
Claudette Upton
Point Roberts
Agreed with Peltier and Fraser. Supports moratorium. Have been told by
county's emergency services that no disaster plan is in place for the Point.
Said traffic has increased by 40 percent in the past two years.
Stafford Smith
Bellingham Attorney
Represented the Point Roberts Taxpayers Association. Said development
should continue, but options should be preserved so that the development is
beneficial. Said Tull's arguments that free market will prevail are not
valid; also, special considerations or restrictions can be in place for Point
Roberts because it is a unique part of the County. Distributed a letter
talking about changes to the ordinances proposed.
Sylvia Schronberg
Point Roberts
Minutes, 2/9/89, Page 4
Favors the moratorium.
Hansey closed the two public hearings. He noted that five votes (2/3 of
the Council) would be needed to pass the emergency ordinance.
ROEHL MOVED TO ADOPT THE EMERGENCY ORDINANCE IMPOSING A 30 -DAY
MORATORIUM.
Roehi said that Point Roberts is unique; a moratorium is not the death
knell of growth and development. Said if the goal is to establish Point
Roberts as a resort area, he didn't think a proliferation of gas stations
Would be a good contribution. He said residents don't want their kids to grow
up to work at gas stations; higher quality development and Jobs are needed.
WARNER MOVED TO AMEND THE EMERGENCY ORDINANCE TO IMPOSE A 45 -DAY
MORATORIUM.
Warner said that quality of fife is the most important consideration,
and that gas stations would ruin that.
Motion carried to amend the ordinance.
Jackson said she supported the moratorium because it supports the
community and not individual developers.
Johnson said he supported the moratorium, and that he didn't expect it
would hamper residents' lifestyles.
Vanderpol said he supported the moratorium as well, although it would
not always be the best course of action because it steps on free enterprise.
Because Point Roberts is unique, however, a short moratorium would be
acceptable. Said he didn't support the conditional use idea.
Hansey said he would vote against the emergency ordinance, as he did the
first one. Using emergency powers to implement land use zoning is improper.
He said a 45 -day moratorium won't help Point Roberts' problems of too many gas
stations. it would be economically unfeasible for any more gas stations to be
built, anyway.
Burton said he was troubied by the moratorium, but had decided to
support it. Point Roberts has been and always will be threatened because of
its proximity to the Canadian border. It is not a free enterprise situation,
it is one of opportunism. Forty-five days will give Council a chance to
address the issue.
Motion carried 6 -1, with Hansey in opposition.
Johnson moved that the meeting be adjourned.
The meeting was adjourned at 10 :05 p.m.
ATTEST:
Ramona Reeves, Council Clerk
WHATCOM COUNT
WHATCOM COUNT
nal d G
n
Motion carried.
CIL
HiN ON
Chairman