HomeMy WebLinkAboutCounty Council October 10 1990WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
October 9, 1990
The meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by Council Chairman Don Hansey.
Also Present: Absent:
Dennis Vander Yacht None
Emily Jackson
Bob Imhof
Dan Warner
Marge Laidlaw
Mary Vanderpol
READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the September 28 special meeting.
The minutes were approved as submitted.
EXECUTIVE ITEMS
1. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF BID FOR PURCHASE OF SOFTWARE,
INSTALLATION, CONSULTATION AND TRAINING FOR A COMPUT-
ERIZED TRACKING SYSTEM FOR BUILDINGS AND CODE ADMINIS-
TRATION, FOR $34,900.00, PLUS TAX (AB90 -340)
Van Zanten explained this issue. Warner reported Finance recommended approval
to the Council.
C�. i n: i ►1: 3 6 &Tea k tell I
Motion carried unanimously.
2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF BID FOR PURCHASE OF HARD-
WARE FROM STATE BID LIST TO SUPPORT A COMPUTERIZED
PERMIT TRACKING SYSTEM FOR BUILDINGS AND CODE ADMINIS-
TRATION, FOR $13,373.29 INCL. TAX (AB90 -341)
Warner reported Finance recommended approval to the Council.
WARNER SO MOVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE TO ENTER
INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
SERVICES FOR A SPECIALIZED WASTE REDUCTION AND RECY-
CLING EDUCATION PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $32,250 (AB90-
342)
Van Zanten explained the next three items. Warner reported Finance recommended
approval to the Council.
WARNER SO MOVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE TO ENTER
INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
GROUP FOR COMMERCIAL WASTE AUDIT PROGRAM IN THE
AMOUNT OF $13,500 (AB90 -343)
Warner reported Finance recommended approval to the Council.
WARNER SO MOVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
5. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE TO ENTER
INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
GROUP FOR REUSABLE MATERIAL EXCHANGE FACILITY
PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,500 (AB90 -344)
Vanderpol expressed some reservations about the reusable materials exchange facility
program. Vander Yacht said it is legitimizing scavenging considering the County kicked
people out of Cedarville for doing the same thing. Warner reported Finance recommended
approval to the Council.
WARNER SO MOVED.
Warner said this will not deprive the agencies such as the Salvation Army, the
Mission, etc. of anything.
Vanderpol said he could envision this becoming a headache because it will be
cheaper for people to take things to this facility than to take them. to the landfill.
Motion carried 6 -1 with Vander Yacht against.
EXECUTIVE'S REPORT
Solid Waste: Van Zanten distributed a positive letter from UTC for consideration.
OPEN SESSION
Bob Fenley, Whatcom County Pomona Grange: Read a letter signed by Phil Quimby,
Ira Prather and Carl Jepson, stating the following: The Granges were upset with Council
for eliminating competition; They believe Olivine has been treated unfairly; They oppose
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 2
mandatory garbage pickup,particularly when hauled by persons who would have a monopoly
and were authorized to charge on a cost -plus basis; The Granges recommend garbage drop
stations in several county locations to supplement the present services and favor education
on the best practices in recycling and composting.
John Davis, Citizens Against Nonrepresentation: Read his letter that states the
group urges the Council to do the following: To not enact the proposed solid waste
collection district and mandatory garbage collection and service level ordinances; To take
immediate action to obtain oversight power on handlers and prevent the abuses and
overcharging from absolute monopolies; To generate solid waste funds using retirable bonds
for siting and construction of a new landfill and a surcharge based on the actual weight of
solid waste generated; To facilitate effective competition in solid waste disposal by
expediting approval of the Olivine request for a transfer station to haul garbage to the Pasco
landfill and encouraging private sector firms to construct and operate safe landfills, recycling
and disposal facilities here; To work with collectors to establish "metered service" options
on all sizes of residential refuse containers; To establish free recycling services in the county
with recycling being subsidized from grants and solid waste programs as needed when costs
exceed revenues from recycled products. Davis asked that the citizens be allowed to work
with the county in developing solutions to the solid waste problems.
Martin Keeley, 610 South Beach Road, Point Roberts: Yesterday Canadians bought
$80,000 worth of gas in Point Roberts. The recent plan stated no new gas stations in Point
Roberts yet it is now getting 12 more pumps at the Chevron station. How could this station
expand without a conditional use permit. He quoted a portion of the code.
There is a Whatcom County permit posted at the project; he said this is another
sloppy job of inspection and enforcement. Variances are being made to the new plan before
the ink is dried on the paper. There are also rusty hulks of cars even though there is a junk
car ordinance. He would like Council to stop any further gas stations and make Buildings
& Code enforce the current laws.
Barbara Brenner, 5617 Northwest Road: Commented on the Olivine's appeal. She
said she had read Warner's letter which said landfilling is not in solid waste plan. The focus
continues to be on Olivine when RECOMP continues to intentionally disregard the plan as
they negotiated with NWAPA for permission to bum additional amounts. They burn
medical waste and truck regular garbage so are not adhering to the intent of the plans. She
said she approves of the service level ordinance and thinks it is well written.
HEARINGS AND FINAL CONSIDERATION
1. ORDINANCE AMENDING WCC CHAPTER 17, "FLOOD DAMAGE
PREVENTION," TO INCORPORATE NEW FEDERAL FLOOD MAPS AS
REQUIRED BY THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
(AB90 -316)
Public hearing opened. No one testified and the hearing was closed.
Vanderpol reported that Public Service recommended approval to Council.
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 3
VANDERPOL SO MOVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
FINAL CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SERVICE LEVELS FOR SOLID WASTE
AND RESIDENTIALRECYCLING COLLECTION IN UNINCORPORAT-
ED AREAS AND NON - RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING IN ALL AREAS OF
WHATCOM COUNTY (AB90 -306)
Vanderpol said there are amendments to this ordinance. Vanderpol reported Public
Service recommended adoption of this item.
VANDERPOL SO MOVED.
the
Thomas said there is some flexibility as to the frequency of collection. If this is
created there will not be any serious cost factor if the district is adopted but will be high if
the district is not adopted. She said there is a difference of opinion whether the county has
authority to make rate structure although she feels it does.
Warner asked if LTC say our rate structure is allowed; LTC does have the authority
to make the rate. Counties can not set rates for haulers, only tipping fees. Vanderpol said
if first can costs $12, does the hauler get the benefit of extra cans when it clearly does not
cost the hauler as much to collect the second can. There was discussion between Thomas
and Jackson about linear garbage rates and whether higher rates for successive cans might
encourage waste reduction.
VANDERPOL MOVED THE ABOVE AMENDMENTS BE ADOPTED.
Motion carried unanimously.
JACKSON MADE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT: SECTION 1A AFTER
EXTENT PRA ABLE ONLY ::::::::>
SWUMM INCINERATED OR LANDFILLED.
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 4
Motion carried unanimously.
JACKSON MOVED TO ADD A NEW SUBSECTION,
Hansey asked Thomas if there would create any problem. Thomas said it is out of
alphabetical order and the county has no right to approve recyclers. Jackson said she does
not want to close the door to recyclers. Thomas said she understands Jackson's concerns
but if a recycler is included there could not be a single bill. Jackson is against giving all the
business to the haulers and stated the recyclers would not be charging so there would be no
bill.
Pat Dunn, Heller, Herman, White & McAuliffe (attorneys for the haulers): Dunn
said Jackson is correct, if there is no charge there would be no problem. The other point
is we wrote in if haulers do not perform as county wants, they could pull the string and
would then be controlling it through a contract. Vanderpol said if that is the case, is there
a need to add the definition.
Dan Liedecker, Nooksack Valley Disposal: He said this is a long term marriage, and
they must invest a lot to get started and he objects to further regulations. He said there is
protection written in to this ordinance and if recyclables become more valuable, the cost of
pickup may be reduced in the future. Jackson asked if he objected to the addition of
recycler; he said he did. Jackson said 50 percent of the waste stream will be recyclables
if the County reaches its goals and that is being handed over to the haulers.
John Davis, CAN, asked if this would be contrary to the Waste Not Washington law;
Thomas said it would not.
Thomas suggested amending Jackson's amendment to say a collector of source
separated materials who imposes no charge.
Jackson restated the amendment with the addition of Thomas' language:
RECYCLER MEANS A COLLECTOR OF SOURCE SEPARATED MATERIALS
WHICH IMPOSES NO CHARGE FOR SERVICE AS A NEW SUBSECTION G.
Jackson said she would like to propose an amendment: ON PAGE 9, SECTION 5
AFTER CERTIFICATED HAULERS ADD THE WORDS
Thomas disagreed with the addition on page 9 as it would mean recyclers would then
have to come under UTC; this could drive up rates because the haulers would take the best
routes.
Jackson asked how this ordinance protects the rights of recyclers.
Jackson said she would be happy to withdraw her motion if legal staff would look
into ensuring the County is providing for private recycling.
Warner said Jackson's concern is a good one that he shares but we must be careful
not to create other problems. He said he also believes there needs to be competition. He
said the Council can bring this back for review at any time. The hauler must provide the
recycling containers, make an investment and make laborious reports. The council should
request from administration the copies of the progress reports.
Vander Yacht said we have regulation but no competition.
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 5
Jackson withdrew her motion.
Laidlaw has an amendment on page 12 of the ordinance "The Solid Waste Manager
shall research recyclable material markets and other program costs associated with the
residential recycling collection. The Solid Waste Manager shall report annually to the
Council and to the WUTC regarding such research."
LAIDLAW SO MOVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
Laidlaw stated another amendment on Page 14 of the ordinance, on K. add the
election made by this ordinance pursuant to RCW 36.58.040, notifying the WUTC to carry
out the Plan rather than awarding a contract, shall continue for five years from the date of
adoption, except as provided in this subsection.
LAIDLAW SO MOVED.
Jackson has some concerns about guaranteeing it for five years. Vander Yacht said
he could not support this; most businesses have some risk. Vanderpol said there are
safeguards built in, with controlled service and review. If the product becomes that
valuable, rates would have to be changed.
Motion to amend carried 5 -2 with Vander Yacht and Jackson against.
There was discussion between Jackson and Warner about an amendment in section
10 or a new 11 to review proposed fees for service before implementation. Thomas said the
County will have a 45 day window to act if it does not like the way things are going.
The amended ordinance is before us, said Hansey.
Imhof said he does not feel good about this issue; he said he has not been able to
get any information on rates. Warner said if haulers do not do a satisfactory job the
opportunity is revoked and there is a provision for the county council to get back into this.
Jackson expressed concern that not all amendments had gone before the Solid Waste
Advisory Committee (SWAC); Bob Jurica said the first draft did go before the SWAC
except for today's amendments.
Warner said this issue has been subject to more review than any other issue the
county has dealt with. Warner said he is also concerned with competition.
Vander Yacht said he can't articulate as well as Dan but his concern is with
competition; he will however support the ordinance.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. ORDINANCE CREATING A SOLID WASTE COLLECTION DISTRICT
(AB90 -3)
Vanderpol reported Public Service forwarded this issue without recommendation.
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 6
VANDERPOL MOVED THE COUNCIL PASS THIS ORDINANCE.
Vanderpol stated he had some amendments: On page 85 of the packet, section 3,
solid waste' collection district ... be added every place in the ordinance that solid
waste collection appears.
Motion to amend carried unanimously.
Vanderpol made the following amendment: Delete section 3 entirely, and replace
it with the following:
A. [same]
B. Any person who wishes an exemption from the provision or application of this
ordinance may file an affidavit with the Solid Waste Manager which states substantively as
follows:
I swear or affirm that I should be exempt from the requirements of universal
recycling and solid waste collection because I am disposing of my solid waste in an
environmentally sound way.
This affidavit is subject to verification by the Solid Waste Manager or his /her
designee.
C. {Use previous "D ".]
Vanderpol thinks the mandatory district is responsible and the will of the people.
Some of the objections coming from people would be answered if the exemption was
changed to the above wording.
Vander Yacht disagrees with Vanderpol and said he thinks the county is just trying
to diffuse the issue and stop complaints. Warner said an oath is heavy duty. Imhof said in
committee the staff had seemed concerned with who will police this and how can this be
enforced. Vanderpol defended this over the menu of exemption criteria.
Jackson asked if 50 percent say they are doing this in an environmentally sound way
would the other 50 percent pay for their share. Vander Yacht says he thinks the county is
trying to wimp out on this; Vanderpol says he does not think this will be wimping out and
Laidlaw agreed.
Motion to amend carried 4 -3 with Jackson, Vander Yacht and Imhof opposed.
Ordinance adopted 5 -2 with Vander Yacht and Jackson against.
Warner spoke to CAN and said it is a misnomer as this has been through the system
more than any other piece of legislation since he's been on the Council.
Vander Yacht said we are getting to a government of initiative and referendum.
3. ORDINANCE INCREASING THE SALARY FOR BOARD OF EQUAL-
IZATION MEMBERS (AB90 -308)
Warner reported Finance recommended approval of this item with the following
.......................... ...............................
amendment: Ordinance #@ increasing the salary for the Board of
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 7
Equalization members from the present $50 per day to $55 per day
Delete lines 18, 19, and 20, and the word fafther on line 21.
WARNER MOVED TO AMEND.
Motion carried 6 -0.
WARNER MOVED THE AMENDED ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED.
Motion carried 6 -0 with Vander Yacht out of the room.
4. ORDINANCE ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET FOR THE
SUMAS RIVER FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NO. 2 FUND (AB90-
330)
Warner reported Finance recommended approval of this item.
WARNER SO MOVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
5. ORDINANCE REVISING THE CURRENT EXPENSE FUND, HEARING
EXAMINER'S APPROPRIATION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
(AB90 -331)
Warner reported Finance recommended approval of this item with the following
amendment: The amount to be added is $244. rather than $1,500.
WARNER SO MOVED.
Motion to amend carried unanimously.
Amended ordinance carried unanimously.
6. ORDINANCE REVISING THE 1990 TORT CLAIMS FUND (AB90 -332)
Warner reported Finance recommended approval of this item.
WARNER SO MOVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
1. APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION ON CU 10- 89/2 -90,
FILED BY OLIVINE CORP. (AB90 -294)
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 8
Randy Watts, Chief Deputy Civil Prosecutor, stated that he had stated in the
Committee of the Whole meeting that there had been a finding of fact made concerning
recycling. This finding of fact was not made, only a conclusion of law.
JACKSON MOVED TO OVERTURN THE HEARING EXAMINER AS BEING
CLEARLY ERRONEOUS ON THE ENTIRE RECORD BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF
EXISTENCE IN THE RECORD OF ANY STATEMENTS TO SUPPORT THAT THE
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN WAS REFERENCED IN TITLE 20 TO
CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
Watts noted that a letter had been received from Bob Tull of Langabeer, Tull and
Cuillier, attorneys for RECOMP, that states "..I wish to have clarification of whether Mr.
Imhof is engaged in private business dealings with the Olivine Corporation or its principals.
I believe that such dealings may exist, involving the selling, leasing or brokering of vehicles
or equipment. In no way do I suggest that such dealings, if occurring, would be improper
or inappropriate in any way. It is simply a case, however where a Council person simply
cannot participate in a quasi-judicial matter if he or she is financially involved with an
appellant."
Imhof replied that he had never had any dealings with Corky Smith, Sr., Jr., or the
Olivine Corporation with any equipment leasing, purchases, sales or anything else and he
said he will put that on the record and will not disqualify himself.
Warner asked how the Council will know if this solid waste is being handled correctly
and how it will be policed. Jackson said it is handled through the Health Department.
Warner stated it should say that the Solid Waste Plan needs to be conformed to. Jackson
said it is valid to consider whether we should say that but we did not say that when Olivine
applied for this permit.
Motion failed 4 -3 with Hansey, Vanderpol, Laidlaw and Warner against.
IMHOF MOVED TO OVERTURN THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION
ON THE OLIVINE CASE BECAUSE OF AN ERROR OF LAW.
He stated our Attorney has just said there was no finding of fact; that recycling was
not included. He discussed the difference in wording of should and shall making this non-
specific. A letter was produced at the hearing stating long haul did comply with the
Whatcom County Solid Waste Comprehensive Management Plan (SWCMP). This letter was
directed to one of the Vice Presidents of RECOMP in Denver by our own Solid Waste
Manager, Bob Jurica. For these reasons, Imhof said he could not understand the Hearing
Examiner's decision.
Warner asked Watts if the Hearing Examiner concluded that the application did not
adhere to the Solid Waste Plan but there were no findings to support this, would this not
be an error of law and should we remand it to the Hearing Examiner or ask Olivine to
resubmit another plan that does comply.
Watts said in the Hearing Examiner's decision he does make some finding of fact
dealing with the state law and WACs which lists landfilling as the least preferred method
of solid waste handling. There is a finding of fact that the applicant asserts that the
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 9
SWCMP is not a formal element of the comprehensive plan itself and therefore a
conditional use application need not comply with that plan. He then concludes as matter
of law that in fact it is a part of the law and the comprehensive plan has to be complied
with and makes a conclusion of law that the permit application of the Olivine Corporation's
proposal was to add a transfer facility to a landfill method of solid waste management in
direct contradiction of state and county policies. The findings of fact was based on the
application.
Imhof said Olivine has bins for source separation the same as the competition
( RECOMP). In the plan it says we "should" have this and that, not shall. At RECOMP it
is dumped into trucks and sent to Eastern Washington.
Vander Yacht urged the Council Members to exercise their judgment carefully.
Vanderpol said at this point he cannot agree with Imhof. He does not think Olivine is far
from being in compliance with the plan and he would like to see them get in compliance.
He suggested a reapplication.
Imhof said as Watts states the application complies in every way but the Solid Waste
Management Plan and that "shoulds" are what we would like to have but not a mandated
thing. In his opinion it falls within the plan; we are discussing what was on the books when
the application was filed, said Imhof. There was discussion between Vander Yacht and
Warner on this issue. The implication of overturning the Hearing Examiner is to permit a
landfill facility, said Warner. He would prefer to remand this to the Hearing Examiner.
Motion failed 4 -3 with Hansey, Vanderpol, Laidlaw and Warner against.
LAIDLAW MOVED TO REMAND THIS TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
IMPOSITION OF CONDITIONS SUCH AS REDUCTION, RECYCLING AND OTHER
KINDS OF SOURCE SEPARATION.
After discussion and input Laidlaw made the following amended motion.
LAIDLAW MOVED TO REMAND THE OLIVINE APPEAL BACK TO THE
HEARING EXAMINER WITH IMPOSITION OF CONDITIONS TO ENSURE
ATTENTION TO RECYCLING AND SEPARATION OPPORTUNITIES IN COMPLI-
ANCE WITH THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN.
Amended motion carried unanimously.
Haney made a statement asking Council members not to impune the motives of
other Council members.
2. APPOINTMENT TO SEWAGE APPEALS BOARD (AB90 -335)
VANDERPOL MOVED GERALD KRAFT BE APPOINTED.
Motion passed unanimously.
3. APPOINTMENTS TO CEMETERY DISTRICT 3 COMMISSION (AB90-
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 10
336)
VANDERPOL MOVED RICK SHAW AND FAYE JACOBS BE APPOINTED.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. NEW APPLICATION FOR A BCEF LIQUOR LICENSE BY KENNY
JAKE DIXON AND SHELLEY ALBERTA DIXON FOR THE WORK-
SHOP (KING COHO ENTERPRISES) AT 7863 BIRCH BAY DRIVE,
BLAINE (AB90 -346)
VANDERPOL MOVED THIS APPLICATION BE APPROVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
5. NEW APPLICATION FOR AN EF LIQUOR LICENSE BY AUDRA MAE
PANGBURN FOR THE CUSTER COUNTRY STORE, 2910 MAIN
STREET, CUSTER (AB90 -347)
VANDERPOL MOVED THIS APPLICATION BE APPROVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
6. REQUEST FOR SUPPORT FOR FOURTH CORNER DEVELOPMENT
REGARDING LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MATCHING FUND PROGRAM
(AB90 -337)
Laidlaw reported Planning & Development recommends the Council give its support
to this item and send a letter.
I�IR3my , 10611k, Fj [oIiI��
Motion carried unanimously.
7. *RECEIPT OF APPEAL, HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION ON
SHORELINES VARIANCE 8 -90, FILED BY ROBERT PETRIE (ON FILE
PENDING TRANSCRIPT RECEIPT) (AB90 -338)
The Council received this item; it will be processed on receipt of the transcript.
INTRODUCTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES ( *CONSENT ITEMS)
1. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING HILL - BURTON UNCOMPENSATED AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE OBLIGATIONS OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT
FOR ITS EXPANDED FACILITY (AB90 -334)
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 11
Warner reported Finance recommended approval to Council.
WARNER SO MOVED.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. *ORDINANCE REVISING THE 1990 NW WASHINGTON FAIR FUND
APPROPRIATION FOR UNANTICIPATED PROPERTY PAYMENT AND
CAPITAL COSTS (AB90 -345) (FINANCE)
3. *ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FROM
RURAL -ONE DWELLING PER 10 ACRES TO RURAL -ONE DWELL-
ING PER FIVE ACRES FOR ONE PARCEL (10 ACRES) IN THE
FOOTH LI.S SUBAREA (AB90 -339) (PLANNING)
Items 2 and 3 will be referred to the appropriate committees and will be on the
October 23 agenda.
REPORTS AND OTHER ITEMS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS
Mt. Baker Theater: Vanderpol said he is on the Mt. Baker Theater Board. When
the theater was purchased the County made a one -time donation so it would not be involved
with the ongoing operations. Last week a fund became available for restoration from State.
He said they plan to restore the front of the theater, put the lights up again and rebuild the
marquee. There is some assurance that they will receive a grant of $125,000 and Vanderpol
wants to take $50,000 from the Visitors and Convention Bureau subject to the Mt. Baker
Theater getting the State grant.
VANDERPOL MOVED THAT THE EXECUTIVE BE ASKED TO DEVELOP
AN ORDINANCE TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD AT THE NEXT MEETING.
Motion carried unanimously.
Lake Whatcom Watershed Committee: Vander Yacht reported for the Lake
Whatcom Watershed Committee; he said Galvin and Taylor of Planning had made a
presentation on the forestry classification at the 10/2 meeting.
Pt. Roberts: Warner wants clerk to transcribe Martin Keeley's comments and
forward them to the Executive and ask that his complaints be addressed.
Meeting Schedule: Laidlaw moved the Council meet December 4 and ll, reserving
December 18 for emergencies, since December 25, and January 1 would the regular meeting
days; the first meeting in 1991 will be January 8.
Motion carried unanimously.
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 12
Meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
ATTEST:
Bar ara Maher, Coun lerk
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
ASHINGTON
Minutes, 10/09/90, Page 13