Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCommittee of the Whole March 7 20001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL Committee Of The Whole March 7, 2000 The meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. by Council Chair Marlene Dawson in the Council Committee Room, 311 Grand Avenue, Bellingham, Washington. Also Present: Dan McShane L. Ward Nelson Connie Hoag Barbara Brenner Sam Crawford Robert Imhof OTHER BUSINESS ADDENDUM: Absent: REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING APPEAL OF A GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD DECISION (BIRCHWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION VS. WHATCOM COUNTY) Karen Frakes, Senior Civil Deputy Prosecutor, stated part of the discussion needs to be held in executive session. Crawford moved to go into executive session. Motion carried unanimously. (Clerk's Note: Committee came out of executive session at 6:16 p.m.) Dawson stated the Council's understanding is that the property owners in the Birchwood area would appeal the decision. The question is whether or not the Council will support the citizens in that hearing. Frakes questioned whether any of the councilmembers wanted any more discussion about the difference between the Council piggybacking on their deal or the Council instigating its own appeal. There is a difference between those two options. The direction she needs is whether or not to appeal the decision, and whether or not she needs to take an inactive or active role. Brenner questioned why they are voting on this during Committee of the Whole. It is not fair to the public. Committee of the Whole, 3/7/2000, Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Hoag stated she believed committees could not take official Council action. Dana Brown - Davis, Clerk of the Council, stated the Committee of the Whole can take action because it is comprised of the entire Council. McShane moved to go into executive session. Motion carried unanimously. (Clerk's Note: Committee came out of executive session at 6:21 p.m.) Frakes stated that, based on the motion that will be made, it isn't really taking any action. Brenner stated they are committing money. Frakes stated they aren't, to the same extent that they would if she filed an appeal. The code requires that, if a lawsuit is going to be filed, the Council has to take action and decide whether that will happen. When the Council gives legal counsel direction on how to act on another's appeal, it isn't action. Brenner disagreed because it is a money commitment. Imhof moved to actively participate in the Garrett appeal. Hoag objected to that because of all the time and effort that the City of Bellingham and the neighborhoods spent coming up to an urban fringe plan for that area. The plan limited commercial uses so that it would help to guarantee the development of light industrial. The regulations that were adopted did not do that. She agreed with the Growth Management Boards findings on this. She did not think the Council should go against all the testimony they received, the neighborhood, and the City of Bellingham. Brenner agreed with Councilmember Hoag. The Growth Management Act said they were supposed to deal with the general good, not just the good for a few property owners. She assumed the Port of Bellingham would also object because that is the main entrance to the airport. There is already office space and manufacturing in the area. The intersection is already a messy one. Any more development will further impede the free flow of traffic there. That is opposite of what they said they wanted to do with growth management. She questioned how they can call an area a light industrial area if there are no safeguards to ensure that there will be any light industrial development. It could totally build out to commercial uses. McShane stated the councilmembers are hearing only what they want to hear. He can't read the development regulations and find them even remotely defensible. They don't carry out what the plan of the area says. There is an emphasis on the city concurrency, which he feels strongly on, but it goes beyond the concurrency issue of public process. It just doesn't match what the plan says. Committee of the Whole, 3/7/2000, Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 The motion carried 4 -3 with Hoag, Brenner, and McShane opposed. 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING CURRENT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING NEGOTIATIONS (AB2000 -121) Imhof moved to go into executive session to discuss this and the next item until approximately 7:00 p.m. Nelson left during this discussion. 2. DISCUSSION WITH SENIOR DEPUTY PROSECUTOR KAREN FRAKES REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION (AB2000 -018) ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at approximately 7:00 p.m. Jill Nixon, Minutes Transcription These minutes were approved by Council on April 18 , 2000. ATTEST: Dana Brown - Davis, Council Clerk WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON Marlene Dawson, Council Chair Committee of the Whole, 3/7/2000, Page 3