HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinance July 13 20041
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
DISCLAIMER: This document contains the Whatcom County Council or Committee
minutes, as approved. However, unless an attested signature page is attached, they
are not the final approved minutes.
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
Finance and Administrative Services Committee
July 13, 2004
Committee Chair Sam Crawford called the meeting to order at 11:05 a.m. in
the Council Chambers, 311 Grand Avenue, Bellingham, Washington.
Present: Absent:
Sharon Roy None
Dan McShane
Also Present:
Laurie Caskey- Schreiber
Seth Fleetwood
Barbara Brenner
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
1. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY BUDGET, 9T"
REQUEST (AB2004 -262)
Dewey Desler, Deputy Administrator, stated there are three elements to the
request, which include funding for a temporary accountant position in Superior
Court, Economic Development Council (EDC) website development, and the Blaine
boardwalk project.
Roy moved to recommend approval to the full Council. She supports the
approach to problem solving to collect the fines for Superior Court. The documents
in the Council packet were good information and answered her questions.
Desler stated that with this population, the County has to be assertive in
collecting the monies it's owed.
Roy asked if the Chamber of Commerce already has a website that promotes
the county, and asked how many they need. Desler stated the EDC says the
County needs a major presence on the internet. It takes some effort to plan and
construct websites. This is a one -time expense. The Executive supports it.
Roy asked if there is an overlap of services between the EDC, Chamber, and
Convention and Visitor's Bureau (CVB). Desler stated they can't avoid an overlap.
The Chamber will not contract with the County much longer. It wants to be more
independent. Later this year, the County will evaluate its relationship with the EDC
and the CVB.
Caskey- Schreiber stated the EDC will link to the CVB website and is working
to not duplicate information and work. The EDC applied for a grant for this work,
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, 7/13/2004, Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
DISCLAIMER: This document contains the Whatcom County Council or Committee
minutes, as approved. However, unless an attested signature page is attached, they
are not the final approved minutes.
but was turned down. The amount requested is a fraction of what they hoped to
get. She has a lot of confidence in the new director. He's working very hard for the
dollars the County provides. He's being very frugal.
Motion carried 2 -0 with McShane absent.
2. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED
VOTERS OF THE COUNTY A PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING A LOCAL
SALES AND USE TAX OF ONE TENTH OF ONE PERCENT FOR THE
PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FUNDS FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH
FINANCING, DESIGN, ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, EQUIPPING,
OPERATING, MAINTAINING, REMODELING, REPAIRING, RE-
EQUIPPING, AND IMPROVEMENT OF JAIL FACILITIES (AB2004 -263)
Dewey Desler, Deputy Administrator, stated the tax would generate about
$2.7 million per year beginning in 2005. The money will only be used for the cost
associated with the building, operation, and maintenance of the jail. They will focus
on the minimum - security jail to begin with, then a new main jail. There is enough
to do both. They will get the site on Division Street up and running, and then
construct a new main jail in the next six to eight years. This item would authorize
an election in November.
Roy moved to recommend approval to the full Council.
Caskey- Schreiber asked if the County has hired a project manager that will
work with existing staff. Desler stated the County solicited applications for a design
and construction coordinator, but hasn't been able to recruit anyone to meet its
needs. The administration will continue to recruit someone who will work closely
with staff and represent the County's needs and requirements. He needs expertise
to coordinate design, bidding, and monitoring of this effort. He will have to readjust
the job description for a project manager. The pay scale they proposed isn't
adequate for the expertise they need, but they can't afford to do this on a contract.
He'd rather develop the expertise in- house, anyway. The County will re- advertise
the position in a week or two.
Roy asked if the project manager's skills would lay with managing large
construction projects, not in law enforcement. Desler stated that's correct. The
project manager would focus on other projects as well, but those other projects
would not be funded from this source.
Crawford stated the County administration made a presentation about the
sales tax increase to the local Republican Party, which voted to endorse this tax
increase. The administration, sheriff, and prosecutor are doing a good job making
this case to the public.
Motion carried 2 -0 with McShane absent.
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, 7/13/2004, Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
DISCLAIMER: This document contains the Whatcom County Council or Committee
minutes, as approved. However, unless an attested signature page is attached, they
are not the final approved minutes.
COUNCIL "CONSENT AGENDA" ITEM
1. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE TO AWARD
CONTRACT FOR DESIGN, PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION FOR THE WHATCOM COUNTY MINIMUM SECURITY
JAIL, COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER, TRIAGE CENTER, ELECTION
CENTER AND STORAGE FACILITY TO HDR, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTIVE TO NEGOTIATE AND SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH HDR,
INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $925,800 (AB2004 -267)
Roy moved to recommend approval to the full Council.
Dewey Desler, Deputy Administrator, stated this authorizes the Executive to
sign the agreement with HDR. The proposed scope -of -work is in the Council packet.
At times, it will be modified to focus on the jail first. They still have to reconfirm
programming around the election warehouse.
Motion carried 2 -0 with McShane absent.
2. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE TO ENTER INTO A
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN WHATCOM COUNTY
AND HDR ENGINEERING, INC. TO REVIEW POSSIBLE SITES FOR A
REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER IN THE CITY OF BELLINGHAM OR THE
URBAN GROWTH AREA OF THE CITY OF BELLINGHAM IN THE AMOUNT
OF $24,426 (AB2004 -268)
Dewey Desler, Deputy Administrator, stated the Council wanted to look at
possible sites before finalizing the master facilities plan. The administration worked
with HDR and the City of Bellingham to do that. He asked the Council to meet next
Tuesday to talk about it. This project may cost less than this amount. He wants to
make sure the administration fully responds to the needs of the Council.
Roy moved to recommend approval to the full Council. She is concerned
about this. The councilmembers all want the ability to look at other sites in
Bellingham. She is concerned about how far this is going. She imagined they
would find general locations before evaluating what the building will look like. The
scope -of -work seems to go beyond what she imagined. It jumps too far ahead.
Brenner stated the agreement is to identify sites. However, the documents in
the packet is to review sites. The Council wanted to identify sites. She's disturbed
to hear that the administration has already met with HDR and the City of
Bellingham, which all want the site to be out of the city. They needed a neutral
party present. She's concerned about a prejudiced report of the sites. She only
wants to see what sites area available, not to hear which sites are better than
others.
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, 7/13/2004, Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
DISCLAIMER: This document contains the Whatcom County Council or Committee
minutes, as approved. However, unless an attested signature page is attached, they
are not the final approved minutes.
Caskey- Schreiber stated she recalls the conversation and remembers they
talked specifically about being within the city limits of Bellingham, not the urban
growth area (UGA). She asked if the administration could do that.
Crawford stated the councilmembers were at an impasse regarding the future
law and justice facility. The idea came up that councilmembers wanted to know
about possible locations other than the current jail footprint. He doesn't recall the
Council putting constraints on where it might be.
Fleetwood stated he recalls a number of councilmembers stating they hoped
to know the footprints that exist that are closer to the downtown core rather than
further away. He believed they would be presented with some of those sites.
Desler stated this provides a number of pieces of information about the sites.
He urged the councilmembers to meet with the administration next Tuesday and
see the information they've developed to -date. If the Council doesn't want any
more information, then it should tell the administration at that point. Approve this
item now. The administration will present basic, preliminary information about
sites, the zoning ordinance, the essential public facilities comprehensive plan, and
other relevant information. Once the Council sees and discusses the information,
the administration can stop if the Council chooses.
(Clerk's Note: Councilmember McShane arrived at 11:35 a.m.)
Brenner stated that a committee member should amend the agenda bill on
Council packet page 30 to say it will identify sites, not review sites.
Roy moved to have HDR only identify sites, not review those sites. Amend
Council packet pages 30, 31, and 32 to remove all references to reviewing sites.
The committee concurred.
Caskey- Schreiber suggested that the committee make an amendment that
site identification is only for sites within the city limits.
McShane asked why the Council would not want HDR to do any review at all.
He would want to hear their expertise on these sites.
Crawford stated the concern is about presentation. The presentation may not
be objective.
McShane stated that without review, he would be predisposed toward a site
that might be harmful.
Roy stated they would have to trust at some level. The concern is that the
information will be slanted toward a certain decision. She will want that review at
some point. Some councilmembers feel this item goes beyond the Council's original
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, 7/13/2004, Page 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
DISCLAIMER: This document contains the Whatcom County Council or Committee
minutes, as approved. However, unless an attested signature page is attached, they
are not the final approved minutes.
request for just finding out if there are available sites. The review comes later.
Caskey- Schreiber stated they could remove the distrust if the committee
removes the allowance for identifying sites outside of the city limits.
Brenner stated the review should come later, when the Council decides on
identified sites that look interesting. It's a question of cost in addition to a question
of trust. If there are ten sites identified, but the Council is only interested in five
sites, then only five sites are reviewed.
Caskey- Schreiber stated HDR should engage in a slight review to determine
whether a site is even feasible and can handle the load geologically.
McShane stated there are a lot of other things that might make a site not
feasible.
Desler stated it's disconcerting to hear there is a lack of trust in the
administration. The administration has not tried to steer the Council in a particular
direction. They're not talking about laying out the buildings, but the characteristics
of sites based on transportation, wetlands, zoning, siting criteria, and many other
issues. Review the information the administration generated so far, and provide
direction to the administration to make the appropriate decision on their next steps.
Brenner stated the councilmembers are not elected to trust the
administration, but to balance the administration. She likes getting information
when she wants it from the administration. She's very uncomfortable with anyone
implying the councilmembers don't understand enough about the issue. They need
to go slow with this issue.
Caskey- Schreiber stated she agreed. It's not a matter of trust, but the
administration's perspective versus a multitude of perspectives. It's better for the
Council to exert its position now rather than later, after the administration spends
money.
Roy moved to remove reference to identifying sites within the urban growth
areas.
Fleetwood stated that limits their options. The Council is just looking at
options. He asked if this is Councilmember Caskey - Schreiber's position to stay in
Bellingham.
Caskey- Schreiber stated it is not. There was consensus at the last meeting
on this issue to look downtown first. That doesn't mean they won't consider the
UGA, but explore downtown first.
Roy stated that was her idea as well. That was the sense of the Council at its
last meeting on this issue. There are two options at the opposite ends of the
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, 7/13/2004, Page 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
DISCLAIMER: This document contains the Whatcom County Council or Committee
minutes, as approved. However, unless an attested signature page is attached, they
are not the final approved minutes.
spectrum. She supports looking at other parcels in Bellingham. If there aren't,
they may have to move to the UGA's.
Desler stated the administration would be happy to limit identifying sites to
the city of Bellingham. He referenced the scope -of -work and asked what the
Council does and does not want to see.
(Clerk's Note: End of tape one, side A.)
Brenner stated she wants to look first at the sites that are physically
available, then decide which she's interested in, then have the review. Each
councilmember will have to do that individually. That should save the County some
money.
McShane stated the scope already reflects specific areas within the city the
contractor will work on.
Motion failed 1 -2 with Roy in favor.
Motion to approve carried unanimously.
3. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE TO ENTER INTO A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONTRACT BETWEEN WHATCOM COUNTY
AND WESTCOAST COUNSELING & TREATMENT CENTER FOR
OUTPATIENT SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES (AB2004 -269)
Roy moved to recommend approval to the full Council.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE TO ENTER INTO A
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BETWEEN WHATCOM COUNTY
AND GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 231, SHERIFF'S
SUPPORT STAFF BARGAINING UNIT, FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1,
2004 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2006 (AB2004 -270)
McShane moved to recommend approval to the full Council.
Motion carried unanimously.
S. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE TO ENTER INTO A
RESIDENTIAL LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN WHATCOM COUNTY AND
THE WHATCOM COUNTY SHERIFF TO LEASE THE APARTMENT
LOCATED AT SILVER LAKE PARK AT 9006 SILVER LAKE ROAD, MAPLE
FALLS, WA FOR A TOTAL OF $650 PER MONTH (AB2004 -271)
Roy moved to recommend approval to the full Council.
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, 7/13/2004, Page 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
DISCLAIMER: This document contains the Whatcom County Council or Committee
minutes, as approved. However, unless an attested signature page is attached, they
are not the final approved minutes.
Crawford asked what this is for.
Dewey Desler, Deputy Administrator, stated the County owns a home
through the Parks Department at Silver Lake Park. This is an accounting measure
to show there is a cost to the Sheriff's Office and a benefit to the Parks Department.
There is no change to the general fund.
Crawford asked if the deputy has to report this benefit as income. It's a form
of compensation.
Marvette Gwinner, Accountant, stated the deputies don't report their housing
as income. That is the same for Point Roberts and Baker Lake.
Brad Bennett, Finance Division Manager, stated the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) regulations say the housing compensation is not taxable when it's for the
employer's convenience.
Motion carried unanimously,
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 12:00 p.m.
Jill Nixon, Minutes Transcription
ATTEST:
Dana Brown - Davis, Council Clerk
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Sam Crawford, Committee Chair
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, 7/13/2004, Page 7