Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning March 30 20101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL Planning and Development Committee March 30, 2010 CALL TO ORDER Committee Chair Bill Knutzen called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 311 Grand Avenue, Bellingham, Washington. ROLL CALL Present: Ken Mann, Bill Knutzen and Barbara Brenner Absent: None Also Present: Carl Weimer, Sam Crawford and Kathy Kershner OTHER BUSINESS Knutzen stated the Council will issue an invitation (on file) to all petitioners and interveners relating to Ordinance 2009 -071. He has asked Hearing Examiner Michael Bobbink to facilitate the meeting. He would like councilmember feedback on the draft invitation. Crawford stated the County Council is hosting this event. It is not proposed and organized by the administration. It will be a Council meeting. All councilmembers have agreed to attend. He read the draft invitation. It will be a Committee of the Whole meeting. He is comfortable facilitating this discussion. He met with another professional facilitator, who thought they would do just fine. He brings a lot of experience with this issue to the table. Knutzen stated the Council is coming at this from a neutral standpoint. He wants to hear all sides of each story. They will base their decision on the feedback of each party. A facilitator will control the meeting and provide an unbiased point -of -view. Weimer stated an independent facilitator may be a benefit. The State Department of Commerce used to provide that service at no cost. It's something to look into. David Stalheim, Planning and Development Services Director, stated he contacted the State Department of Commerce, who provides a list of those services. They have used Hearings Board members from other Hearings Boards to mediate. That was their advice. It would have to be someone from a different hearings board. Crawford stated they are fine on their own. Mann stated he doesn't have high expectations for the outcome of this meeting, so he's not wrapped up in who runs it. If Councilmember Crawford wants to take on that challenge, let him. He doesn't want to pay for a professional facilitator. Planning and Development Committee, 3/30/2010, Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Brenner stated she has high hopes for the outcome of the meeting. She's fine with allowing Councilmember Crawford to facilitate the meeting. Rebecca Craven, Council Policy Analyst, asked if she can send out the invitation. The councilmembers concurred. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION 1. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WHATCOM COUNTY CODE, TITLE 20, TO CLARIFY AND REVISE THE DEFINITION AND STANDARDS OF HOME OCCUPATIONS (AB2010 -047) Mann moved to recommend approval to the full Council. The following staff person answered questions: • Wain Harrison, Planning and Development Services Department Discussion included the memo from Mr. Harrison to the Council dated March 23, 2010 regarding home occupation size limits on Council packet page 246; the disparity of the memo language and the graduated scale of home occupations and cottage industries; consistency with cottage industry regulations; allowing this in the smallest, most confined business and not in a larger -scale operation; Crawford stated be clear about what they are trying to accomplish. Define better what this 8,000 square foot structure is. Apply the definition equally across the various types of small businesses. Do a better job of defining what an older barn is. packet. Mann moved to recommend a hearing on the ordinance as presented in the Council The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mann, Knutzen and Brenner (3) Nays: None (0) 2. RURAL ELEMENT UPDATE - DISCUSSION OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT REQUIREMENTS AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS (AB2010 -072) Crawford asked about allowing an extension due to economic circumstances before plats expire. He asked the status of that item. David Stalheim, Planning and Development Services Director, stated the staff is putting that proposal together, and it will go before the Planning Commission in May. The preliminary draft may go to the Council before Planning Commission, to make sure they are on the right track. Crawford asked to introduce that draft as an interim ordinance in two weeks, and adopt it as an interim ordinance in four weeks. Stalheim stated that's up to the Council. The concern is that an interim ordinance won't provide permanence. Planning and Development Committee, 3/30/2010, Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Crawford stated it would provide relief to the people sooner. Stalheim stated they need to change the land division ordinance and zoning ordinance. They need to change two ordinances. Crawford stated he needs something to introduce in two weeks. Stalheim stated staff can get that in two weeks. The following staff people gave a staff report, read a presentation (on file), and answered questions: • Gary Davis, Planning and Development Services Department • David Stalheim, Planning and Development Services Department Director Discussion included whether the County has any rural residential, three units per acre (RR3) zones; whether rural character can be created through building design rather than limiting the size; incorporating the limited areas of more intense rural development (LAMIRD) provisions of the Growth Management Act (GMA); whether the LAMIRD's are fine the way they are; aligning the LAMIRD's and County Comprehensive Plan; the Clallam County option of applying a density overlay to rural areas; the Hearings Board definition of a rural density; whether the County zoning is really out of compliance outside of LAMIRD areas if it justifies the rural character; limiting the zoning in a density overlay; whether or not the Supreme Court ruling no longer allows the Hearings Board to accept an established bright line; whether the Supreme Court gave any guidance on defining rural zoning; the definition of rural character being different for large expanses of land that are undeveloped, such as 200 acre lots, and acreage with a rural dwelling development, and; issues of character, sprawl, and existing services. Brenner stated explore all the options. Stalheim stated staff is comfortable that all options meet Growth Management criteria. They are viable options. Knutzen stated this will be held in committee. Next time, the Committee will go through recommended maps and text amendments, and follow up direction from today. Kershner stated she would like staff to go ahead with exploring the options, including the options of expanding the LAMIRD over waterlines and the density overlay. Knutzen stated he would like to know which properties were affected. It seems more options are available now. Stalheim stated they can explore the options on slides 28 and 29 more at the next meeting. Davis stated the staff can expand on the options presented at the next meeting. The committee concurred. Stalheim stated think about what the Council wants to do first: hear from the public or develop alternatives. He encourages that the Council have a public hearing up front, early in the process. Weimer asked if it makes sense to send the new options to the Planning Commission for another look. Stalheim stated the Planning Commission agenda is full for 2010. The Planning Commission could have a discussion on a focused issue, if time allows. People have agreed to remand to the Hearings Board. He anticipates the Hearings Board will develop a schedule. Planning and Development Committee, 3/30/2010, Page 3 1 2 ADJOURN 3 4 The meeting adjourned at 4:35 p.m. 5 6 Please contact the Council Office to obtain an 16 17 18 19 official, signed copy: 360- 676 -6690 or council(g-.o.w hatcom .w a.us Dana Brown - Davis, Council Clerk Bill Knutzen, Committee Chair Planning and Development Committee, 3/30/2010, Page 4