HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil November 9 20101
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
Regular County Council
November 9, 2010
CALL TO ORDER
Council Chair Sam Crawford called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers, 311 Grand Avenue, Bellingham, Washington.
ROLL CALL (7:00 :35 PM)
Present: L. Ward Nelson, Sam Crawford, Barbara Brenner, Carl Weimer, Bill
Knutzen, Ken Mann and Kathy Kershner
Absent: None
FLAG SALUTE
ANNOUNCEMENTS (7 :01 :31 PM)
Crawford presented an award of appreciation to outgoing councilmember Ward
Nelson for 17 years of service on the Council.
Pete Kremen, County Executive, it's appropriate to recognize Councilmember
Nelson's service to the people of the county. His decision to appoint Councilmember Nelson
the last year was difficult. He made the right decision. Councilmember Nelson honored his
commitment to not run for office again, which was a factor of his decision. Councilmember
Nelson is a collaborator and man of conviction, providing excellent public service to the
people of Whatcom County for 17 years.
Nelson stated he thanks everyone in Whatcom County. This is the best experience a
person can have. Everyone works hard to make this a nice place to live. They all only want
the best for Whatcom County.
Crawford announced there was discussion regarding a draft ordinance
amending Whatcom County Zoning Code Title 20, the Official Whatcom County
Zoning Map, and the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan and Maps, to
implement changes relating to rural land use planning (AB2010 -072A) during the
Special Committee of the Whole meeting.
MINUTES CONSENT (7:09:04 PM)
Brenner moved to approve the Minutes Consent items.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
1. REGULAR COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SEPTEMBER 28, 2010
2. SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR OCTOBER 12, 2010
3. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR OCTOBER 12, 2010
4. REGULAR COUNTY COUNCIL FOR OCTOBER 12, 2010
S. SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR OCTOBER 26, 2010
OPEN SESSION (7:10:01 PM)
The following people spoke:
• Jennifer Bernard, 2305 Tuttle Lane, Lummi Island, spoke on Lummi Island ferry
fares.
• Riley Starks, 4300 Macia View Drive, Lummi Island, Willows Inn Owner, spoke on
Lummi Island ferry fares.
• Megan Krause, Lummi Island, spoke on Lummi Island ferry fares.
• Bob Knodt, 1414 - 37th Street, Bellingham, submitted a handout (on file) and
spoke on senior centers and the Council on Aging.
• Harold Voldt, 873 - 19th Street, Lynden, submitted a handout (on file) and spoke
about the Senior Citizen's Program Panel, senior centers and the Council on
Aging.
• Al Guthrie, Sumas Senior Center President and member of Senior Citizen's
Program Panel, spoke on the senior centers and the Council on Aging.
• Mark Sexton, 1253 Jamison Street, Lummi Island, submitted a handout (on file)
and spoke on Lummi Island ferry fares
• Leonard Lindstrom, Bellingham, spoke on social behavior.
• Diane Conda, 4595 Wynn Road, Bellingham, submitted a handout (on file) and
spoke on jail siting.
• Jody Bierman, 1401 Marietta Avenue, Bellingham, spoke on jail siting.
• Marion Henderson, Bellingham, spoke on jail siting.
• Edmond Bereal, 4540 Curtis Road, Bellingham, submitted a handout (on file) and
spoke on jail siting.
• Barbara Sternberger, 4540 Curtis Road, Bellingham, spoke on jail siting.
• Abe Jacobsen, 2314 Samish Way, Bellingham, spoke on Lummi Island ferry fares.
• Kris Ungern, 2095 North Shore Road, Bellingham, submitted a handout (on file)
and spoke on the County budget.
• Carl Olsen, 2015 - 24th Street, Bellingham, submitted a handout (on file) and
spoke on the County budget.
• Gary Lysne, 2472 North Shore Road, Bellingham, spoke on the County budget.
• Michelle Luke, 3342 Sunrise Cove, Lummi Island, spoke on Lummi Island ferry
fares.
• Mary Prinsen, 3391 Nicole Lane, Custer, spoke on the Women, Infant, and
Children (WIC) Program.
• Ken Gass, 2107 Evening Star Lane, Bellingham, spoke on the role of the Health
Department.
• Gregory Jilik, 920 - 22nd Street, Bellingham, spoke on jail siting.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
• Betsy Purnotto, 3112 Alderwood Avenue, spoke on the community's priorities.
• (Clerk's Note: The speaker following Betsy Purnotto requested that his /her
testimony not be included in the minutes. The speaker's testimony is available on
the meeting's audio recording.)
• Jim Dickinson, 2094 West Shore Drive, Lummi Island, spoke on Lummi Island
ferry fares.
• David Parsons, 2231 N. Nugent Road, Lummi Island, spoke on Lummi Island
ferry fares.
• Shawn McCole, 2064 Sunrise Road, spoke on Lummi Island ferry fares.
• Paul Acres, 1730 Squalicum Mountain Road, Bellingham, spoke on creating a lean
government.
PUBLIC HEARINGS (8 :14 :47 PM)
Crawford invited Executive Kremen to make introductory remarks relating to the
budget process and provide an overview of changes that have been made up to today.
Pete Kremen, County Executive, stated he will discuss Mr. Acres' Lean America
Program. In the future, they will plan a two -hour visit to Mr. Acres facility and learn more
about his program. There are many positive aspects to learn to make Whatcom County
leaner than it is.
He invited the public and community members who are concerned with the jail to a
meeting on the issue. He would like to have a meeting to discuss that issue, which
deserves a discussion with the administration, councilmembers, and the public. He will set
a date that will work with the Rural Avenue Neighborhood Association.
This has been the most difficult economy since the 1930's. This particular year and
this budget process have been the most challenging he's ever experienced. He
complimented the County Council on working with the administration to construct a budget
that serves the needs of the community, despite the limited revenues. In all other charter
counties, the County Executives and their staffs do not consult with their Councils. The
differences between the Whatcom County Council and Whatcom County administration is
less than one percent of the overall budget. That indicates their ability to work together as
a team.
These decisions have been the most difficult of his career. He's been listening to the
people, councilmembers, and WIC staff. After much deliberation and soul searching, he
proposes that they retain the WIC program in the County Health Department. The proposal
won't be the status quo, but it will retain the talented staff they have, in part. It will keep
them in the Health Department serving the WIC program for County government. To do
this, they will capture annual federal and State funds, which adds up to about $430,000.
The County general fund will provide $150,000 per year. That enables the County to keep
WIC in the Health Department, on a modified basis. They currently have 7.5 full -time
equivalent (FTE) employees. In 2011 and 2012, they can keep the WIC Program at
adequate levels with 5 FTEs. He will work with the WIC staff and department administration
to accomplish this. He's committed to doing so. At the County Council's next meeting in
two weeks, he will ask the Council to make a technical correction to the position control
numbers for the WIC Program.
There has been a lot of discussion about the road fund levy shift to the general fund.
After a lot of consideration, he proposes that they instead do a levy shift from the flood fund
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
to the general fund, not the road fund. It would be very equitable for everyone in Whatcom
County, regardless of where they live. It would enable them to fund all the important
programs to the general fund, without any inequity. He wants to work with the Council and
public to provide all the services needed in the community, and still live within their financial
means.
Brenner asked about the issue of the senior centers. Kremen stated he has not
addressed the issue with any conclusion. He is concerned about some of the issues that
have been raised. He's been working with staff. They believe they can get into that issue,
but it's doubtful whether or not it will resolve to everyone's liking. He will address the
concerns that have been raised. They are valid, and need to be discussed and sorted out.
Knutzen asked if they can implement an eight- member advisory committee from the
senior centers, as the seniors recommended, which would oversee the centers along with
the Council on Aging. Kremen stated there is merit to the proposal. They need to have a
meeting with some of the stakeholders, councilmembers, and anyone else who is interested.
Discuss the merits of that proposal. Greater representation would be a good thing. No
matter what the Council does tonight, he thanks all councilmembers for working with the
administration.
Bill Elfo, County Sheriff, stated he also thanks the Council for their attention to the
severe and serious public safety concerns confronting Whatcom County. He recognizes that
the County is facing unprecedented revenue challenges. The community is facing
unprecedented challenges that directly affect the safety of every person who lives in and
visit the county. Public safety is a primary responsibility of County government. Violence
manifests in homicides, child abuse, domestic assaults, gang activity, barricaded suspects,
and hostages. There have been two bold attempts to murder police officers with firearms in
Whatcom County in the last three months. Eight police officers have been slain in Western
Washington in the past two years.
The State legislature balances its Department of Corrections budget on the backs of
the counties. Sentences normally call for time in the State prison where treatment is
provided, but those treatment programs are gone. These folks are being sent to the County
jail to serve their sentences. They limit the discretion of the courts.
They are also seeing dramatic cutbacks in social services and mental health services.
When these services aren't provided, the people will end up back in the jail. It is a perfect
storm that will affect everyone in the community.
He appreciates that the Council provided guidelines at the beginning of the budget
process that emphasized mandates of the County government. The Council also requested
efficiencies. The Executive listed safe neighborhoods as his first priority in his budget
message, and supports their need for public safety. There are many competing demands
for increasingly scarce public resources. There are a lot of difficult choices to be made. He
uses those guidelines to form the basis of the Whatcom County Sheriff's Office 2011 and
2012 Fiscal and Operational Plan. He submitted a difficult budget plan. They will
experience an overall reduction of $1.5 million during the next budget cycle. This reduction
is in addition to those implemented last year and the beginning of 2010. While these
reductions will affect their service levels, public safety, and efficiencies, they have carefully
and thoughtfully submitted a plan to best use those resources they have to perform their
core and primary responsibilities and legal mandates of protecting the members of the
public and those in his custody. These reductions are not sustainable beyond the next
budget cycle, without resulting in more dramatic impacts to safety, services, and risks.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
These cuts aren't sustainable without a real reduction in services, as they've seen in other
counties that haven't prioritized public safety.
No simple strategies could have been implemented without affecting the bottom line
of providing high quality of service to the public. The community must understand there
will be program changes and changes to the types of incidents they handle, and how they
are handled. Despite these reductions, they will continue to prioritize and triage services in
a competent and professional manner. They have focused core efforts on gaining
efficiencies. They have already incorporated some elements of Mr. Acres' lean concept,
which resulted in a $43,000 savings and freed staff for operational functions. There are
more opportunities there in the future.
Nine positions in the Sheriff's Office will remain frozen during the next budget cycle,
including two law enforcement deputies, two corrections deputies, three support staff, and
two staff members are on extended military leave. He previously explained the program
changes planned. The budget and operational plan focuses on the core mission, so they've
deployed resources and programs to respond to emergency reports, reports of child abuse,
and maintaining a safe jail. Those are his three priorities moving forward. They will keep
the essence of some programs. The neighborhood deputy program will remain intact.
However, that deputy will at times be used to support patrol. The traffic unit will also be
used more to support patrol. They will no longer do Crime Watch programs. That deputy
will focus on operational efforts and serving as a neighborhood deputy in areas of the
county that don't have a neighborhood deputy. They have made changes to the marine
patrol in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security. They have reduced office
staff, combined the station deputy and courthouse deputy.
All of this will get them through the next couple of years. He will look for more
efficiencies. At some point, he will ask the Council to help them find funding for the records
management system, to enable information -led policing and reduce support staff needs.
Often, the same information on a case is entered into systems multiple times. It is a lot of
redundancies and opportunities for error. Small investments in technology will correct
much of that. He's trying to reduce medical costs in the jail. He's negotiated lower fees
with the healthcare providers. They've gone after third -party insurance companies and the
Veteran's Administration, and those in jail who can afford to pay. Inmate medical costs are
now down to the 2006 level. They've achieved efficiencies with jail meals. There are more
challenges ahead.
Someone commented that they should remodel the existing jail. The jail they're in is
falling down around them. They will spend millions of dollars to keep this facility functional
and safe. They don't need a 2,400 -bed jail in Whatcom County, but they do need to
incorporate the appropriate design and technology to reduce the need for staffing. The
current jail design is very expensive to operate. It's labor intensive. They want to build
smart and to the right size. It also must be able to expand in the future, so they don't have
to start over again. Build sufficient infrastructure, including a kitchen facility, medical
facility, properly- designed control booths, and the ability to add pods incrementally, if
needed. They must plan for the future.
They've lost a lot of State funding for the drug task force. It's the only tool they
have to preventing gang violence, gun trafficking, and drug trafficking. He's tried to cover
those costs without asking the Council for an increase. He's trying to hold things together.
The budget is prudent, wise, and will serve the citizens well. Everyone in his agency is
committed to doing that.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Crawford stated the Council must first have the hearings on the levy of taxes for the
various funds, then have the budget hearing.
1. ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR COUNTY AND STATE
PURPOSES IN WHATCOM COUNTY FOR THE YEAR 2011 (AB2010 -371)
(8 :43:44 PM)
Crawford opened the public hearing and the following people spoke:
Abe Jacobsen, 2314 Samish Way, Bellingham, stated thanked Executive Kremen for
his reconsideration of the Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) Program and the road fund
levy shift.
Patrick Alesse, 4825 Alderson Road, Birch Bay, stated the tax shift is taking money
out of one pocket and putting into another, in the amount of $500,000. Someone in the
city would be paying more taxes for more services to someone in the county, who
sometimes turn down opportunities to pay more taxes. That's not right. His money should
go toward his services. He doesn't want a handout from someone in Bellingham.
Hearing no one else, Crawford closed the public hearing. (8 :47 :27 PM)
Nelson moved to adopt the substitute version of the ordinance.
Brenner moved to hold for two weeks. She just heard today about the changes.
Give people a chance to look at it. She then withdrew her motion. She wants to allow
discussion. She won't vote on this tonight.
Mann stated they just announced the substitute. It doesn't give the public any
notice to comment on it.
Knutzen stated he spoke with John Hutchings in the Public Works Department about
flood funding effects. He was told it would not affect projects. There will be no increase in
taxes. They are shifting money from one fund to another to cover the general fund
shortfall. His concerns have been alleviated by talking to Public Works Department staff.
He is comfortable with the ordinance.
Nelson stated this has been done in the past. Post people don't want their taxes
raised in this economy. They also don't want specific programs sacrificed. The flood fund
will be maintained. There is a flood fund reserve to protect from flooding. The real estate
excise tax (REET) funds can be used for stormwater projects. The administration is using
excess funds to good use, without raising taxes to fund another use. The shift is a way of
not having to raise taxes. He thanked the administration for bringing forward this proposal.
Brenner stated the proposal looks good, but there is a trust issue. People should
have a chance to look things over before the Council approves the budget and these levies.
Kershner stated the language in the ordinance references the Council's approval of a
budget, but the Council has not yet approved the budget. She asked if they must first
adopt the budget before adopting this ordinance. Make sure they're adopting these
ordinances in the correct order.
Nelson moved to hold vote until after the budget hearing.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
6. ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE FINAL BUDGET OF WHATCOM COUNTY FOR THE
BIENNIUM 2011 -2012, AND RESTRICTING THE EXPENDITURE OF CERTAIN
FUNDS THEREIN (AB2010 -376) (9 :00:29 PM)
Crawford opened the public hearing and the following people spoke:
Al Guthrie, 3457 Alm Road, Everson, stated defer the vote on the Parks and
Recreation Department budget for two weeks. Allow a panel to be developed and respond
to the Council.
Mike Cohen, Bellingham Food Bank Executive Director, stated he thanks the Council
for including $58,000 for the Food Bank and small potatoes gleaning project. These funds
will be used judiciously and wisely. The Food Bank distributes more than a million pounds
to more than three dozen food banks and feeding programs throughout Whatcom County.
The small potatoes gleaning project will use funds to recover more than 120,000 of food
annually from local farms and homeowners.
Catherine Chambers, 1542 Iron Street, Bellingham, stated she thanks
councilmembers for supporting WIC and Executive Kremen for proposing to retain the
Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) Program. She thanks Councilmember Kershner for
supporting the Food Bank. As a young mother, she received services from the WIC
program. She has also been a volunteer at the Food Bank. She described the positive
impacts these programs had on her. Contracting the WIC program to a private agency is
something to seriously consider. The Interfaith health center would provide excellent
services as a WIC provider. However, the service is more extensive at the Health
Department. Include the WIC program and food bank funding in the budget.
Laurel Kunesh, 2622 Russell Street, Bellingham, stated she is opposed to cutting the
WIC program from the Health Department. The proposed provider doesn't have the space
or means to continue the services at their current level. She's met with many people who
benefit from the services. The conditions at a nonprofit agency don't allow for the stable
workforce that the Health Department has. Do not allow this program to be reduced.
Tom Kunesh, 2622 Russell Street, Bellingham, stated he is encouraged by Executive
Kremen's attempt to preserve the WIC program in the Health Department. All programs
housed in the Health Department target public health risks in the community. They are
investments to prevent problems with law enforcement, education, and healthcare. Moving
the programs out of the Health Department or eliminating them, will fail the community.
Protect the Health Department programs.
Max Morange, Bellingham Food Bank Small Potatoes Gleaning Project Manager,
stated he thanks the Council for their support of his project. He described how the project
harvests and distributes food. Without funding, they could only distribute harvested food in
Bellingham, not throughout Whatcom County, which would be inefficient and not a good use
of their volunteer hours.
Susan Gribben, 3006 Victor Street, Bellingham, stated WIC supports people and will
save money in the long run. WIC is at Seamar and Lummi to serve those communities with
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
people from their communities. WIC has done well in the Health Department. The health
clinics are coming up short on insurance coverage for all the people they treat.
Marvin Wolff, 5413 Barr Road, stated he thanks the Council and Executive for giving
public safety priority in the budget. The federal guidelines for priorities are continuity of
government, public safety, and critical infrastructure, which includes utilities,
transportation, and medical systems. He thanked the council for making this a priority.
Skip William, Northwest Youth Services Board of Directors President, stated the Teen
Court program is proposed to be cut from the budget. He described the program. It
reduces the rate of recidivism for youth offenders. Youth offenders take their consequences
more seriously when they come from their peers. The courtroom becomes a classroom.
The program saves taxpayers between $525 and $3,154, depending on the nature of the
case. Find a way to restore funding to the Teen Court program.
Doug Robertson, P Bar Association resident - Elect, stated he recommends the Council
fully -fund the judiciary in this budget cycle. In addition, look ahead to develop funding
sources to enhance the judiciary's ability to fulfill the necessary needs of an expanding
population and increasing amount of rules and regulations. He speaks for all the judiciary.
The number one priority of this government is maintaining the rule of law. The rule of law
is the only basis for the continuity of government. The society won't be protected against
crime if the court can't adjudicate the issues. Justice is being delayed. Since last year,
criminal justice officials met to talk through issues and recommend hiring a fourth judge for
the county, using private attorneys as pro -tem judges, and incorporating alternative dispute
resolution provisions to allow private mediation outside the courtroom. Increase the
effectiveness of calendaring and update the criminal conflict and guardian ad litem conflicts.
They have to continue to make the process more efficient. Move to electronic filing,
calendaring, and reporting. Fully fund the judiciary now and in the future.
Brenner asked where their committee recommendations are. Robertson stated they
are still working on the recommendations. The recommendations are for an entire process.
It won't be easy, but it's possible.
Brenner asked why he mentioned the guardian ad litem (GAL) program, but not
Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA). Robertson stated the CASA program will be
incorporated.
Doralee Booth, 8188 Birch Bay Drive, stated she commends the Council for its policy
guidelines regarding the budget. Public safety should be county government's highest
priority. Continue funding deputies in the Birch Bay community. The Sheriff's Office is
working to be creative with the cuts, finding grants, and making the best use of the
resources on core responsibilities. A police presence in the county is important. The
Sheriff's Office ranks last among Whatcom County law enforcement agencies in terms of
number of officers per citizen. Keep law enforcement and corrections staff a high priority in
the budget process.
(Clerk's Note: The speaker following Doralee Booth requested that his /her testimony
not be included in the minutes. The speaker's testimony is available on the meeting's audio
recording.)
Mike Parker, Council on Aging Executive Director, stated he is concerned about the
shift in the senior center model. There will be some pain. However, he also appreciates
that the funding is not completely eliminated. County staff talked with each nonprofit senior
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
center to negotiate and work in partnership. He is concerned with creating a separate
group of people because they already have nonprofits in place with organizational structures
in place. The County should work with those organizations. The Council on Aging has not
engaged the County and does not seek to provide contracted services in other senior
centers that aren't interested in his agency. He has not been approached or asked to
provide contracted services. His agency only works for the Bellingham Senior Activity
Center. The Council on Aging provides some countywide services, such as the nutrition
program. Those services aren't affected in the budget, which targets the coordinator
services. Continue the model that has already been started by Director Mike McFarland and
Deputy Administrator Dewey Desler.
Brenner asked if the Council on Aging would submit a proposal if the County put out
a request for proposal (RFP). Parker stated they would submit a proposal. He's not looking
to provide contracted services in every senior center. If the senior center wants to work
with the Council on Aging, he would. He would only submit a proposal for the Bellingham
Senior Activity Center.
Brenner stated she would like information on how the Council on Aging elects its
Board. Parker stated he will provide that information. Qualified community members are
nominated and elected by the current Board, which is a common nonprofit structure.
Stella Zoller, 1400 - 12th Street, Bellingham, stated the County is cutting WIC and
other services, but plans to build a great big jail. When services are lost, more people go to
jail.
Shane Roth, 3925 E. Connecticut Street, Bellingham, stated he wasn't given notice
of the Executive's decision to shift levies from the flood fund instead of the road fund. The
point of providing notice is so the public knows what the Council is going to do and decide
whether or not to comment. Postpone the vote on that levy so people will have proper
previous notice. The Council is at some risk of violating the Open Public Meetings Act if
they vote tonight.
John Harder, citizen, stated he is a senior who enjoys the Bellingham Senior Center.
He is a member and officer of the Council on Aging Board. They would like to remain a
partner with the County in providing senior services in Whatcom County.
Chris Lindberg, 3730 Canterbury Lane, Bellingham, stated she supports the WIC
program. She appreciates that they are reconsidering the program. Also, fund the Teen
Court program. It's an issue of safety.
Trudy Nordquist, Custer, stated she is a member of the Blaine Senior Center.
Twenty -seven percent of the Parks Department budget being cut will all be from the senior
services section. Seniors are the largest - growing segment of the population in Whatcom
County. They have a lot of volunteers and work well together. They're trying to put
together a panel to support things the way they have been in the senior centers, where the
senior center members have control and know what's going on. They are being told
something different each time they approach someone else. One proposal from her Board
President is to keep two full -time positions, and let those staff go to multiple centers.
Respect the seniors on this issue. Reconsider the cut to senior services.
Harold Bolt, 873 — 19th Street, Lynden, stated his group would like to meet with the
Executive and Councilmembers to discuss the senior centers.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Hearing no one else, Crawford closed the public hearing. (9 :41 :42 PM)
Nelson moved to adopt the ordinance.
Kershner moved to amend the ordinance to approve adjusted services request
(ASR) 2011 -2744 regarding the attritioned position reinstatement to complete the computer
system update in the amount of $72,612 for 2011 and $74,788 for 2012.
(Clerk's Note: The Council took a five - minute break at 9 :45 p.m.)
Knutzen asked legal counsel about compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act.
Karen Frakes, Prosecutor's Office, stated she is not aware of a conflict with the Open
Public Meetings Act.
Brenner stated it's open public government when they give people enough time to
know what's going on. It's reasonable to wait. The County Council has not adopted a
budget this early. This is the most difficult budget they've come across so far.
Kershner stated the ordinance is to adopt the County budget, which has been
properly noticed. The levy shift is a separate ordinance.
Crawford stated this ordinance adopts the budget with the changes they received
today. The Council has never redone public notification based on amendments to the
budget. This is the process the public works with. The current motion is to amend the
motion.
Weimer asked where the money would come from for the Assessor's Office position.
Kershner stated the money will come from the same place the Women, Infant, and
Children (WIC) Program money will come from. He would have to ask Mr. Kremen.
Dewey Desler, Deputy Administrator, stated the money used for both WIC and the
Assessor's Office position would leave a smaller ending fund balance. With the technical
corrections, the money would be there for 2011. If they adopt this motion to amend, they
can fund the position for the year 2011. The money isn't there for 2012. The Assessor said
he won't have these staff requirements in 2012.
Kershner amended her motion and moved to approve adjusted services request
(ASR) 2011 -2744 regarding the attritioned position reinstatement to complete the computer
system update in the amount of $72,612 for 2011 only.
Brenner stated they should put their amendments in writing so they can see the
cumulative effect. She wants to restore Teen Court rather than this. Take the time to go
through things and see the effects.
Kershner stated it sounds like the funding is available for this position, they just
need to restore the position.
Brenner stated her question is how much funding is available. She would rather fund
Teen Court than this.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Mann stated he's confused about the overall process. He asked where funding for
the WIC program and this position would come from. Desler stated he submitted the
technical corrections during the Finance Committee. He read through general fund
projections from 2007 to 2012. They project a fund balance of $8,092,000 at the end of
2012. These proposals and the technical corrections would lower the projected fund
balance.
Mann asked if the only real change is that the administration is willing to dip into
reserves more than originally proposed. Desler stated that's correct. No compensating
reduction has been proposed. It is a legitimate tool for the fund balance.
Knutzen asked about the financial difference between running WIC Program. He
thought the cost was $250,000, according to the WIC staff. Desler stated the information
provided by WIC staff wasn't complete. According to the Health Department Director, this
adjustment could be done with $430,000 in federal funds and about $150,000 in general
funds, per year.
Regina Delahunt, Health Department Director, stated they will have to modify
services. The program won't include all the staff that are currently there. It will be a
reduction in services. It will still be a good, quality service retained in the Health
Department. Staffing levels will be different from what the WIC staff proposed.
Weimer stated he agrees with Councilmember Brenner. They are hearing about a lot
of new things. Iron this out as well as they can, but delay adoption for two weeks.
The motion to amend carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
Brenner moved to reinstate Teen Court in the amount of $18,500. She was
surprised that the court recommended removing it. It's a good program.
Weimer stated he supports the motion. They hear that the Sheriff's Office and
courts are stretched thin. This diversion program costs less money than putting the kids
through the courts. The offenders get dealt with. Other youth also learn about the system.
It's valuable. One reason to delay the vote for two weeks is to hear why the courts didn't
include it in the budget.
Nelson stated the court will handle the cases one way or another, regardless of the
program. It is an additional service of the court. The court was trying to reduce costs
without hurting overall service levels. He asked if that is why the court removed the
program.
Desler stated budget process asked departments for efficiencies, savings, and ideas
for ASR's. The court made this specific proposal, and the administration accepted it.
Brenner stated the court decided to cut this cost, but not obtain efficiency. More
people will go through regular court without this diversionary program. The recidivism rate
for Teen Court offenders is much lower than those who don't go through the program.
Mann stated he will support the motion. It costs a little now, and will save more
money in the future. The Sheriff's job will be easier.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Knutzen stated he will support the motion. They are setting a bad precedent for the
department heads. The Council set a priority list and asked them to make cuts. If the
departments can get enough public outcry from the proposed cuts, the Council is reversing
those cuts. That is a bad precedent for future councils.
Crawford stated he does not support the motion. Reconsider. It's not a judgment of
whether this program has value. They've asked Superior Court to make cuts, and this is
one area they wanted cut. There are a lot of assumptions about recidivism rates. He trusts
that the courts have made a wise choice in where to best apply the funds.
Brenner stated the courts didn't submit an efficient and thoughtful recommendation.
The courts fought against the Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) program for years.
The volunteer program is much less expensive and really helps children. At the end of the
year, the court always has to ask for a lot of money for the appointed guardians ad litem
(GAL), saying they don't have a good volunteer program.
Weimer stated put this off for two weeks until they can hear from the courts. It's
easy for them to protect their own money while cutting money to an outside nonprofit
organization. Also, the budget that has been submitted does not include any information on
programs or services that are being cut. The nonprofit organizations can't follow the
process and protect themselves.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (5)
Nays: Nelson and Crawford (2)
Brenner moved to consolidate the Executive's Office and the Administrative
Services Department. The Administrative Services Department works directly for the
Executive regarding all financial issues for which the Executive is directly responsible. They
are so directly connected that the Director of the Administrative Services Department is also
the Executive's Deputy Administrator. The separation of the two departments may be
duplicative, and it is confusing for members of the public and for her. The public and the
Council deserve to understand who works directly for the Executive in order to contemplate
the best configurations.
Crawford asked if the Council can tell the Executive to do this.
Frakes stated the Council doesn't have authority to direct the Executive on how to
set up the Executive branch. The Council has budgeting authority, not the direct authority
to tell the Executive how to set up his operation. Brenner stated his operation is the entire
administration.
Weimer stated he won't support the motion, but the Charter allows the Council to
reorganize departments, which is the intent of the motion. However, the motion isn't a
good idea.
Mann stated he needs something more specific to vote on.
The motion failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner (1)
Nays: Nelson, Crawford, Weimer, Knutzen, and Kershner (5)
Abstains: Mann (1)
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Knutzen said he would like assurance from the Parks Department Director or County
Executive that they will give these senior center committee members some control over
what happens with those senior centers, and how this will be developed. Desler stated the
Executive's proposal is not to reduce services at the senior centers. They are asking for a
change in the staffing model. Give the staffing ability to manage the programs and set
priorities to nonprofit organizations. The County will still own and maintain the buildings.
They will work together with community groups. They will lay out the things they want to
achieve and pay for, and ask the community groups to respond with proposals. The
administration will make a recommendation this spring on which proposal to accept and
their cost. They will have a robust discussion with the senior groups in the coming weeks.
Knutzen stated it seems like the County is giving the Council on Aging an advisory
role, and there has been some conflict with the Council on Aging on the nutrition program.
Mike McFarland, Parks and Recreation Department Director, stated that's not correct.
They have not given a contract to the Council on Aging, which is one of four major,
incorporated boards in the county. The Council on Aging has a contract for other services
that they provide throughout the county, independent of the Bellingham Senior Activity
Center. It doesn't oversee the over nonprofits, which are all independent. The other
partners are also the owners of the other buildings. The County owns only three of the
centers. The Cities are heavily invested in those facilities, and may be interested in
operating the program in their own communities, as opposed to having the nonprofit. Once
the budget is approved, the administration needs to have that conversation. They've met
with all the organized nonprofits and the facility owners. The Council on Aging isn't
advocating to do those programs, although they would assist if the County asked.
Brenner moved to amend to consolidate the Parks Department by moving:
• the senior center services under the Health Department for senior
centers /services, and
• the maintenance services under the Public Works Department
• all other functions under the Public Works Department as a new division
The Council approved a full -time accountant position in the Health Department, who
could manage the senior center contracts. Eliminate the recreation and senior services
manager position. Allow the boards of all the senior centers elect a member to be part of
an advisory board to the County before changes are contemplated. Make sure any
contractor is willing to work with the advisory board to advise the County. Include that
requirement in any contractual agreement the County signs for senior center services.
Mann asked the opinion of the Parks Department motion. He asked if it's feasible.
McFarland stated there needs to be a reason for the consolidation, such as cost savings,
efficiency, or something else. He hasn't spent any time on this. He doesn't think it's
feasible.
The motion failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner and Knutzen (2)
Nays: Nelson, Crawford, Weimer, Mann and Kershner (5)
Weimer moved to restore the entire WIC Program, including all 7.5 FTE employees
and associated funding.
Brenner stated she supports the proposal from the WIC staff.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Kershner asked about the Health Department's vision for WIC in the future.
Regina Delahunt, Health Department Director, stated there are advantages to both
approaches. Keeping a portion of the WIC staff and continuing the federal funding will allow
the Health Department to provide quality services at a reasonable level in the community.
Additionally, they will be able to keep the majority of the very talented staff. If they can
approach the strategic direction in another fashion, the staff will help the department move
toward a systems -level direction. They can also look at other options. It's very important
to co- locate health services with WIC services. They can talk to Interfaith Coalition about
potentially co- locating services. There are many partnership opportunities. She thanked
Executive Kremen for finding some dollars to allow them to continue those services and
move in that strategic direction.
Brenner asked if the current proposal from the Health Department is the same as the
proposal from WIC staff. Delahunt stated the Health Department proposal is a different
staffing pattern. WIC staff proposed to just cut all the clerical staff, and have the
professional staff do all the clerical duties. They really can't do that. There are Union
issues, and it doesn't make fiscal sense to pay professional staff to do clerical duties. They
can't have work from the professional bargaining unit take work away from the clerical
bargaining unit.
Mann stated the general fund has been subsidizing the WIC program in an amount of
$330,000. Delahunt stated that's correct. The new proposal would work with a general
fund contribution of $150,000.
Weimer stated his motion is to maintain the WIC program an its current functional
level. He doesn't know what that means exactly, because they've seen various proposals
and they're trying to approve this late at night without seeing any proposals.
Mann stated he supports the motion in principal. He hopes they can hold this over
for two weeks and see the proposal.
Nelson stated this program has grown in the last few years. He will vote against the
motion. It's wise to find ways to partner in the community.
Brenner asked where funding would come from.
Weimer stated they are still above the ten percent reserve limit. Like everything
else they're doing, take it from the general fund.
The motion failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Weimer and Mann (3)
Nays: Nelson, Crawford, Knutzen and Kershner (4)
Brenner moved to retain the same number of nutritionists the County currently has
in the WIC program now.
Crawford stated he is against the motion. This needs to be vetted. They can pass
this budget tonight, and the Executive can deal with this in a supplemental budget request.
The administration would have time to sort out how the program would work.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Knutzen stated he is against the motion. They've had WIC staff and department
head come forward to work out a solution. Now that they have, the motion is telling them
the Council doesn't want that solution. He's prone to accept the recommendation.
Kershner stated she won't support the motion. She wants to see the proposal first.
Brenner stated they can't make changes after the budget is adopted. She'll be open
to a better proposal, but keep the options open by making a change within the budget.
Mann stated he's not sure the WIC staff have come to a compromise with the
administration. This is probably the first they're hearing about it.
Knutzen stated WIC staff gave a presentation on their proposal.
Mann stated they don't know what the proposal is. He's interested in keeping a
nutritionist. He supports the motion to keep it fully staffed.
The motion failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Weimer and Mann (3)
Nays: Nelson, Crawford, Knutzen and Kershner (4)
Weimer moved to add $150,000 per year into the Health Department budget for
the WIC Program, to be designed by the County administration.
Crawford stated he is opposed to the motion. There's something to be said for
providing certainty to the public that something is being done. However, handling this as a
separate issue is wise. He asked if the administration can bring this forward in a couple of
weeks. Desler stated they can. He doesn't necessarily disagree with the motion, but it's a
new issue and he'd like time to look at it more thoroughly. They do supplement budget
requests all the time.
Brenner stated this is a new issue. Keep the budget process open so the Council can
decide what it wants when the proposal comes forward.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (6)
Nays: Crawford (1)
Brenner moved to eliminate all premium pay for all 27 employees receiving it.
Crawford stated he is against the motion. It's part of the salary structure that has
been negotiated with a number of folks in the County, including elected officials,
department heads, and managers. The administration convincingly addressed this issue in
the Council's recent work sessions.
Brenner stated it's not part of the salary structure. The Council has discretion on the
premium pay, but not on their salaries.
The motion failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Weimer and Mann (3)
Nays: Nelson, Crawford, Knutzen and Kershner (4)
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Mann moved to eliminate association membership dues in the amount of $65,000
per year.
Crawford stated he's against the motion. The dues is money well- invested. He's
had limited experience with these organizations, which do a lot of good for counties. One of
the primary focuses at the State and federal level is unfunded mandates. The number of
proposed unfunded mandates is many times greater than the association dues. Active
lobbying makes sure the County's concerns are heard.
Brenner stated the associations didn't do anything regarding the State's unfunded
mandate of Enhanced 911. The representative from the association didn't even know what
the money was for, but told them they had to raise the taxes now. That isn't operating in
the County's interest.
Mann stated unfunded mandates squeak through. He asked what the County is
paying them for. He gets many emails from them asking his advice. Information should
flow the other way. He doesn't feel like he gets much help from them. They haven't
stopped the flow of unfunded mandates.
Knutzen stated they have no one to blame for their lack of help from the
Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC), because they've had no representation
on WSAC. Now they do. He suggested a friendly amendment to fund the associations
for one year, and put them on probation.
Mann did not accept the friendly amendment.
Brenner stated plenty of other counties have lobbyists, and still got hit with the
Enhanced 911 tax.
Knutzen stated plenty of other counties have lobbyists, but no refineries in their
district. They ended up with a WSAC that was in favor of the tax on the refineries. Their
voice needs to be heard so the County get representation from them. They carry a bigger
hammer than Whatcom County.
Nelson stated put blame on the bill's sponsor, who came from someone in Whatcom
County and who never told the County about it. They will never wholly protect themselves
from all issues. Removing the County from the organization removes one of the tools from
the toolbox. They won't be made aware of things that are occurring. They all have to
make that choice. Ask if it's worth it to lose tools in the toolbox to protect the County. He
worked with the National Association of Counties (NaCO) on healthcare amendments.
Although his opinion was unsuccessful, he had a voice on the issue that they heard.
Brenner stated they could say that about anything. She writes letters all the time.
It doesn't cost $65,000 for her to write letters.
The motion failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner and Mann (2)
Nays: Nelson, Crawford, Weimer, Knutzen and Kershner (5)
Brenner stated the Public Works Department should consolidate management
positions, as she suggested two years ago. She moved to hold the vote for two weeks.
Mann suggested a friendly amendment that the written record be left open.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Brenner accepted the friendly amendment.
Knutzen stated they've made many changes, and he needs time to consider them.
He is in favor of the motion.
Kershner stated she's ready to adopt the budget tonight. They've made changes
tonight, but she knows what those changes are. They've been talking about these changes
for the past three weeks. She doesn't know what benefit they'd gain by holding it over.
Crawford stated they have a very flexible process and administration. The
supplemental budget process is used frequently and familiar. Most of the budget is not
controversial. Folks are looking for certainty. He's ready to adopt the budget. If they need
to make changes, that's what they do all year long through the supplemental budget
process.
Weimer stated he supports the motion. He wants to see the effect of the changes to
the bottom line and the ten percent reserve. He has concerns about using the flood fund to
supplement the general fund. He would like to see a list of real estate excise tax (REET)
projects that would get funded into the flood fund. He has a concern as a Flood Control
Zone District Supervisor. He would like to know how they are going to fund water programs
in two years.
Brenner stated there is nothing to lose by waiting two weeks. She wants that time.
The motion to hold the vote and continue to accept written testimony carried by the
following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen and Mann (4)
Nays: Nelson, Crawford and Kershner (3)
1. ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR COUNTY AND STATE
PURPOSES IN WHATCOM COUNTY FOR THE YEAR 2011 (AB2010 -371)
(10: 59:17 PM)
Weimer moved to hold for two weeks.
Knutzen stated the Council has to hold these budget items for two weeks, because
they first have to approve the budget.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
2. ORDINANCE LIMITING THE 2011 GENERAL FUND PROPERTY TAX LEVY
(AB2010 -372) (11:00:12 PM)
Crawford opened the public hearing and, hearing no one, closed the public hearing.
Weimer moved to hold the substitute version for two weeks.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
3. ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF 2011 PROPERTY TAXES FOR
COUNTY ROAD PURPOSES (AB2010 -373) (11 :01 :25 PM)
Crawford opened the public hearing and, hearing no one, closed the public hearing.
Brenner moved to hold for two weeks.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
4. ORDINANCE LIMITING THE 2011 ROAD FUND PROPERTY TAX LEVY
(AB2010 -374) (11 :02 :40 PM)
Crawford opened the public hearing and, hearing no one, closed the public hearing.
Brenner moved to hold for two weeks.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
5. ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR CONSERVATION
FUTURES PURPOSES FOR 2011 (AB2010 -375) (11 :02 :57 PM)
Crawford opened the public hearing and, hearing no one, closed the public hearing.
Brenner moved to hold for two weeks.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
7. ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FOR WHATCOM COUNTY FACILITIES (2011 -2016) AND RELATED
AMENDMENTS (AB2010 -355A) (11 :04 :24 PM)
Crawford opened the public hearing, and the following person spoke:
Dewey Desler, Deputy Administrator, stated the administration would like this item
to be held for two weeks.
Hearing no one else, Crawford closed the public hearing.
Brenner moved to hold for two weeks.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
8. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF TAXES FOR THE WHATCOM
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT (WCFCZD) FOR 2011 (AB2010-
378) (11:05:39 PM)
(Clerk's Note: Council acting as the Whatcom County Flood Control Zone District
Board of Supervisors.)
Crawford opened the public hearing and, hearing no one, closed the public hearing.
Brenner moved to hold for two weeks.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
9. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2011 BUDGET FOR THE WHATCOM COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT AND SUBZONES (AB2010 -379) (11:07 :35
PM)
(Clerk's Note: Council acting as the Whatcom County Flood Control Zone District
Board of Supervisors.)
Crawford opened the public hearing and, hearing no one, closed the public hearing.
Brenner moved to hold for two weeks.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
OTHER ITEMS
1. RESOLUTION TO SET HEARING AND NOTICE OF HEARING OF THE SALE OF
COUNTY TAX TITLE PROPERTY BY NEGOTIATION TO WHATCOM COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT — REQUEST #TR2010 -01 (AB2010 -388)
(11:08 :22 PM)
Mann reported for the From Finance and Administrative Services Committee and
moved to approve the resolution.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
2. RESOLUTION TO SET HEARING AND NOTICE OF HEARING OF THE SALE OF
COUNTY TAX TITLE PROPERTY BY NEGOTIATION TO WHATCOM COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT — REQUEST #TR2010 -02 (AB2010 -389)
(11 :09 :48 PM)
Mann reported for the Finance and Administrative Services Committee and moved
to approve the resolution.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
3. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WHATCOM COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,
CHAPTER 4, CAPITAL FACILITIES, FOR FIRE PROTECTION LEVEL OF
SERVICE (AB2010 -370) (11:10:08 PM)
Nelson moved to forward to concurrent review.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
4. NOMINATION AND POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE
WHATCOM COUNTY SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
(BUSINESS /INDUSTRY) — APPLICANT: ED NIKULA (AB2010 -384) (11 :12 :11
PM)
Brenner moved to appoint Ed Nikula.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
S. REQUEST CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE'S APPOINTMENT OF
DOUGLAS STARK TO THE WHATCOM COUNTY MARINE RESOURCES
COMMITTEE (AB2010 -390) (11 :13 :04 PM)
Mann moved to confirm the appointment.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
6. RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST BY THE EVERGREEN WATER -SEWER
DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO CHANGE ITS NAME TO COLUMBIA
VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (AB2010 -386) (11 :13 :18 PM)
Nelson moved to approve the resolution.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
INTRODUCTION ITEMS (11 :13 :49 PM)
Brenner moved to accept Introduction Items two through nine, including the
substitute version of item seven. They should all look carefully at the unified fees the next
two weeks.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Nelson, Crawford, Brenner, Weimer, Knutzen, Mann and Kershner (7)
Nays: None (0)
1. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WHATCOM COUNTY PEDESTRIAN AND
BICYCLE PLAN (AB2010 -381)
2. RECEIPT OF AN APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION
REGARDING CUP2010 -0007 TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A DOG KENNEL
(APPLICANT HEATHER VEENSTRA), FILED BY NATHAN GRAF (AB2010 -362)
3. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2010 WHATCOM COUNTY BUDGET,
SEVENTEENTH REQUEST, IN THE AMOUNT OF $388,375 (AB2010 -380)
4. ORDINANCE AMENDING WHATCOM COUNTY CODE 20.92, HEARING
EXAMINER, REGARDING APPEALS TO THE COUNTY COUNCIL (AB2010 -385)
S. RESOLUTION TO SELL COUNTY TAX TITLE PROPERTY BY NEGOTIATION TO
WHATCOM COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT — REQUEST #TR2010-
01 (AB2010 -388A)
6. RESOLUTION TO SELL COUNTY TAX TITLE PROPERTY BY NEGOTIATION TO
WHATCOM COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT — REQUEST #TR2010-
02 (AB2010 -389A)
7. ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2011 WHATCOM COUNTY UNIFIED FEE
SCHEDULE (AB2010 -377)
8. ORDINANCE AMENDING WHATCOM COUNTY CODE 10.34, FERRY RATES,
AND THE CORRESPONDING 2011 WHATCOM COUNTY UNIFIED FEE
SCHEDULE (AB2010 -354A)
9. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WHATCOM COUNTY CODE, ON AN INTERIM
BASIS, TO ALLOW FOR A ONE -TIME ECONOMIC HARDSHIP EXTENSION OF
LAND USE PERMIT EXPIRATIONS (AB2010 -180A)
OTHER BUSINESS (11:15:36 PM)
There was discussion of the public hearing schedule at the Council's November 23,
2010 regular meeting.
REPORTS AND OTHER ITEMS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS (11:17 :52 PM)
Nelson thanked everyone for allowing him to participate this year, including the
Council staff and County administration.
Crawford asked if anyone was attending the Sustainable Connections walking tour of
downtown Bellingham.
Knutzen thanked Councilmember Nelson for being a good leader by setting a fine
example. He also welcomed the new councilmember.
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ADJOURN
Please contact the Council Office to obtain an
official, signed copy:
360- 676 -6690 or council &o.w hatcom .wa.us
Dana Brown- Davis, Council Clerk
Sam Crawford, Council Chair
Whatcom County Council, 11/9/2010, Page 22