Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSurface Water Work Session November 15 20111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Whatcom County Council Special Surface Water Work Session November 15, 2011 CALL TO ORDER Council Chair Sam Crawford called the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m. in the Whatcom County Civic Center Annex, Garden Room, 322 N. Commercial, Bellingham, Washington. ROLL CALL Present: Barbara Brenner, Sam Crawford, Bill Knutzen and Ken Mann Absent: Kathy Kershner, Tony Larson and Carl Weimer SURFACE WATER WORK SESSION (AB2011 -024) 1. WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA) AND THE LOWER NOOKSACK STRATEGY John Hutchings, Public Works Department, gave a staff report and stated they must decide how to go forward with this water resource planning effort and the scope of the strategy and water plan update. He submitted a handout (on file) and described the history of watershed planning in Whatcom County. Crawford asked and there was discussion of how the $8 million was spent on watershed planning during the WRIA effort. Brenner asked and there was discussion of the deliverables received from the Utah State University (USU) contract. Knutzen stated and there was discussion of how controversial it is to get water rights into the community rather than spend another $2.6 million. Brenner asked and there was discussion of: • Whether they are going through all this to develop their case that will eventually go to federal court. • Whether the information from USU is good to use and will be part of the record. • Whether the Tribes are seriously interested in this. • Whether they will have a better chance of resolving the issues than if they don't do anything. The following people spoke: • Roger Brown, Birch Bay Water and Sewer District, stated he submitted a letter on September 9 expressing his views. This violates the watershed management plan and detailed implementation plan. It is not necessary to do a coordinated water system plan update now. If they do, follow the procedures in that plan. The County, not the Public Utility District (PUD), Surface Water Work Session, 11/15/2011, Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 should be the lead entity. Review the entire program. Consider a general adjudication in State court. • Clare Fogelsong, City of Bellingham, stated don't slow down and wait to do this. The water resource inventory area (WRIA) process biased the negotiation toward in- stream flows. They don't know the out -of- stream needs and issues. They must know that information. The Lummi and Nooksack Tribes asked for federal adjudication. • Wendy Harris stated get community buy -in before going forward. The County should provide basic community education explaining water rights issues. • Marty Mayberry, Bertrand Water Improvement District (WID), stated they're not talking about the other resolution option. The community doesn't understand the impact of quantification of instream flow rights. That makes everyone else junior to those instream flow rights. The County must deal with the gravity of the issue and decide which process to follow. Consider whether it will make any difference in the end. • Henry Bierlink, Farm Friends, stated he has requested the Tribal requests for federal adjudication. • Doug Allen, Department of Ecology, described the status of Ecology's negotiation with the Tribes. Hutchings asked if doing due diligence in preparing this information and in engaging the Tribes is something they have to do anyway. Mayberry stated that's the County's decision. Councilmembers need to know how serious this issue is. Mann asked and there was discussion of educating him as well as the community about the significance of what is happening. Crawford asked and there was discussion of the status of the timeline. Bierlink stated the County was part of the federal negotiations, but there isn't support to be there now. The County must deal with water quantity issues. He supports the information Mr. Hutchings presented. This plan deals with gathering the information they need. Mann asked and there was discussion of whether the Tribes' requests are outside of this WRIA process or will harm the process. The following person spoke: • Steve ]ilk, Whatcom PUD General Manager, stated the objective of the Joint Board isn't to take anything from anyone else. The PUD's interest is to provide leadership on a piece of this process they've been promoting for 12 years. The water purveyors of the County must join together to develop a way to secure their needs. He spends many hours monitoring water negotiations throughout the state. The only county with any success was Walla Walla County. Get the out -of- stream water purveyors, with representation of all stakeholders, together to do what they need to do. Knutzen asked and there was discussion about the situations in Walla Walla County and Kittitas County. Surface Water Work Session, 11/15/2011, Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 The following person spoke: • Marion Beddill stated that if this will be settled in court, the County should be as well prepared as possible. She supports continuing work on the collection and preparation of data. The data collected so far has improved how they deal with water. She congratulated Mr. Hutchings for successfully summarizing the process over time. Jilk stated there have been many discussions about the coordinated water system plan update between the County Health Department, water associations, water and sewer districts, and all the Cities. They agree that the update must be done. The Cities will update their individual system plans, and they want to coordinate with the County's plan. They are in the process of water negotiations. This is the best way to approach it. The following person spoke: • John Wolpers, Health Department, stated the coordinated water system plan needs to be updated. They use it regularly. It makes sense to do it now. Brown stated it's fine if the Health Department needs to update the plan for their service areas. The County should be the lead and have a specific scope of work. He's concerned it will create statutory color to a planning process that violates the watershed management plan. He described what is happening in Walla Walla County and the difference from Whatcom County. Consider general adjudication in State court. It's an open process that results in certainty. Skip Richards stated the history from Mr. Hutchings has serious misleading comments. They've been stalling. Some parties have gone outside the document and are doing their own thing. Any more documents must be legally binding. The problem with the plan is that it is only a planning document, and people are being excluded. Make sure everyone is always involved rather than allow back room deals. Crawford asked the next step. Hutchings stated they must address the issue of representation. He will present a scope of work for a coordinated water system plan update and reestablish the committee. 2. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT MID - BIENNIUM BUDGET (Clerk's Note: Council acting as the Flood Control Zone District Board of Supervisors.) Paula Cooper, Public Works Department, submitted a handout (on file) and stated this budget will come forward in a supplemental budget request. It was discussed by the Advisory Committee. Jon Hutchings, Public Works Department, stated the work plan and budget are inconsistent. There needs to be a budget adjustment to reconcile the budget. Cooper stated $239,551 is a negative increase to the flood balance, but that tends to end up as a balanced budget. It's not likely they will spend everything that is budgeted. About $250,000 is budgeted for emergencies. Hutchings described adjustments made recently to the current budget and the effects on the 2012 budget. Surface Water Work Session, 11/15/2011, Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Crawford asked and there was discussion of how the numbers in the resolution in the Council packet match the handouts. Brenner asked and there was discussion of additional revenues. Cooper referenced the handouts and described the proposed adjustments to the 2012 budget. Crawford stated they will forward this to the Finance Committee and schedule a public hearing. Hutchings stated they must work to define the system of dikes and levees that they're managing, and decide what they're not going to do. Many people are coming forward asking for money for things that aren't part of the system and don't have local sponsors. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 12:30 p.m. The Council approved these minutes on January 10, 2012. ATTEST: WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON l 3 Please contact the Council Office to obtain an 3 official, signed copy: 3 31 360- 676 -6690 or council@7.o.whatcorn.wa.us Surface Water Work Session, 11/15/2011, Page 4