Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Committee of the Whole January 25 20111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL Special Committee Of The Whole January 25, 2011 CALL TO ORDER Council Chair Sam Crawford called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Committee Room, 311 Grand Avenue, Bellingham, Washington. ROLL CALL Present: Barbara Brenner, Sam Crawford, Kathy Kershner, Bill Knutzen, Ken Mann, Tony Larson and Carl Weimer Absent: None COMMITTEE DISCUSSION Addendum: DISCUSSION WITH SENIOR DEPUTY PROSECUTOR KAREN FRAKES REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION (GROWTH MANAGEMENT CASES) (AB2011 -018) Crawford stated that discussion of this agenda item may take place in executive session pursuant to RCW42.30.110. Executive session will conclude no later than 1:20 p.m. If the meeting extends beyond the stated conclusion time, he will step out of the meeting to make a public announcement. Knutzen moved to go into executive session until no later than 1:20 p.m. to discuss the first two agenda items, pursuant to RCW citations as announced by the Council Chair. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Crawford, Kershner, Knutzen, Larson and Weimer (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Mann (out of the room)(1) (Clerk's Note: The Committee came out of executive session at 1:20 p.m. and resumed the meeting in the Council Chambers at 1 :22 p.m.) 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING A DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDING WHATCOM COUNTY ZONING CODE TITLE 20, THE OFFICIAL WHATCOM COUNTY ZONING MAP, AND THE WHATCOM COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND MAPS, TO IMPLEMENT CHANGES RELATING TO RURAL LAND USE PLANNING (AB2010 -072A) Gary Davis, Planning and Development Services Department, gave a staff report and answered questions. The maps are updated to September 7, 2010. Crawford moved to amend page two of the Comprehensive Plan, add the old policy 2A -11 and call it policy 2A -10, (1 :30 :29 PM) "2A -10 Ensure that the development potential Special Committee of the Whole, 1/25/2011, Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 of contiguous lands in common ownership is not compromised when urban growth boundaries and /or LAMIRD boundaries are designated. The term common ownership should include lands owned by the same persons or entities and also by affiliated companies with common ownership. This should be accomplished without expanding UGA and /or LAMIRD boundaries beyond that ownership and without bridging natural divisions of urban /rural land uses such as roads, rivers, and other natural features." Discussion of this motion included the possibility of going beyond logical boundaries if someone has a huge parcel of land; whether landowners will purchase adjacent properties with the objective of expanding the boundaries, and; the possibility of creating another reason for invalidity. The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (4) Nays: Brenner and Mann (2) Absent: Weimer (1) Brenner moved to amend page two, policy 2B -1, "...within urban growth areas and /or other areas through the planned...." Discussion of this motion included whether master planned resort communities need to be in designated urban growth areas; the differences between policies 2B -1 and 2B -2. Brenner amended her motion and moved to amend policies 2B -1 and 2B -2: 1. "2B -1: If this is to be located within urban growth areas, support the economic viability ...amenities within HFban grewth ar through the planned unit..." and 2. "2B -2: If this is not to be located within an urban growth area, new large -scale resort development...." Davis stated staff would look at and suggest language for policies 2B -1 and 2B -2. Brenner stated lay people should understand that these are allowed in other areas. She withdrew her motion. Brenner moved to amend policy 2L -4 "...natural resource -based industries, cottage industries, forestry, fishing, and agriculture...." The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) Crawford moved to amend language under the GMA Requirements section on page 5, "GMA allows counties to designate ... to minimize and contain these — areas— w0thRn beundaFies and net peFngit the n9ere intensive uses and densities te extend beyend these beundaFtes the existing areas or uses of more intense rural development as appropriate." The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) Special Committee of the Whole, 1/25/2011, Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Crawford moved to amend language in the Rural Character and Lifestyle section on page six, "Whatcom County's rural areas are characterized by a mixture of historic rural communities, pasture, agriculture, woodlots, home occupations, and cottage industries, and dispersed commercial and industrial activities. The rural areas provide...." The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (5) Nays: Mann (1) Absent: Weimer (1) Crawford moved to amend language in the Rural Character and Lifestyle section on page six, second paragraph, "This plan recognizes that each rural area ... while a seal+ portion has been developed...." The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (5) Nays: Mann (1) Absent: Weimer (1) Larson moved to amend language in the Rural Character and Lifestyle section on page six, second paragraph, "This plan recognizes that each rural area... residential, light industrial, or business uses..." The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (5) Nays: Mann (1) Absent: Weimer (1) Crawford moved to amend policy 2DD -2, 'Protect the character of the rural area +e as provided in this plan and the GMA." Crawford withdrew his motion Brenner moved to amend policy 2DD -6, "...to be clustered, where it would not create more conflicts with accepted agricultural practices, on a maximum of 25 percent...." Discussion of the motion included the possibility of future conflicts between agricultural uses and clustered residential uses and having a future discussion on the merits of clustering. The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) (2:07:58 PM) Crawford moved to amend policy 2DD -9, "Adopt ngandateFy and incentive programs... where there are compelling reasons to do so, and alleeate suff;,.ment FeseLIr^^^ to eh7eye the desired ebit .enge it The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Special Committee of the Whole, 1/25/2011, Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) (2:11:26 PM) Kershner moved to amend policy 2EE, "eeneuFFeney impact fee." Discussion of the motion included what a concurrency fee is. Kershner stated let staff look into it. She withdrew her motion. Crawford moved to delete policy 2EE -3. Discussion on the motion included taxing appropriately; determining actual costs, and; the net impacts a development may create. The motion to amend failed by the following vote: Ayes: Crawford, Kershner and Larson (3) Nays: Brenner, Mann and Knutzen (3) Absent: Weimer (1) (2:18:02 PM) Brenner noted scrivener's errors in policies 2EE -4 and 2EE -5. Crawford moved to amend policy 2EE -8, "Public services and public facilities necessary for rural commercial and industrial uses shall be rural in natuFe lingited to these neeessary te seFve the use, provided in a manner...." Discussion of this motion includes how this section applies to public services. The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (5) Nays: Brenner (1) Absent: Weimer (1) Knutzen moved to amend page eight, Rural Employment Opportunities, "...commercial and 4g-hft industrial uses located within Rural Communities, Rural Tourism, and Rural Businesses are also important contributes to the local economy...." Discussion of this motion included using the identifying terms instead of types I, II, and III LAMIRD's. The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) Crawford moved to amend policy 2FF -1, "...resource- based, tourist, recreational and other appropriate 4g-ht industries in the rural areas.... "" The motion carried by the following vote: Special Committee of the Whole, 1/25/2011, Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) Kershner moved to amend policy 2FF -4, "Allow home -based occupations, and cottage industries, and tourist and recreational uses throughout the rural area provided they do not adversely affect the surrounding residential uses or rural character." The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) Brenner moved to amend page 10, policy 2GG -6, "...less than the underlying zone, PaFtieUlaF}y when necessary...." The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) (2:36:16 PM) Brenner moved to amend page 13, policy 2HH- 2(A)(3), °Is characterized by the intensification of development... that do not include new residential development, other than a dwelling unit accessory to the business for use by the owner - manager or caretaker." The following person answered questions: • Sam Ryan, Planning and Development Services Department Director Discussion of the motion included whether Title 20 allows a residence accessory to a business use. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) Brenner moved to amend page 13, policy 2HH -2 (B)(2), "...not new other than a dwelling unit accessory to the business for use by the owner - manager or caretaker." Discussion of the motion included the reason that the area may include residential development existing on September 20, 2005 and defining new residential units as existing after the date of this ordinance. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) Kershner moved to amend policy 2HH- 2(B)(2) "The area may include pre- existing, but not new (except for dwelling units accessory to the business for use by the owner - manager or caretaker) residential development existing on September 20, 2005, beet Special Committee of the Whole, 1/25/2011, Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 new etheF than a dwelling unit aeeesseFy te the business fer- use by the ewneF n9anager e -.ke ea;��a -� and ... . Crawford restated the motion to amend 2HH- 2(B)(2), "The area may include pre- existing residential development existing en SeptembeF 20, 00S, but not new except for dwelling units accessory to the business for use by the owner- manager or caretaker, and." The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) There was discussion about land owned by common owners in type I LAMIRDs in policy 2HH -1. Kershner moved to delete policy 2HH- 2(B)(1). That language is redundant. Davis stated it is in policy 2HH- 2(A)(3). (3:01:39 PM) The motion to amend carried by the following vote: Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Knutzen, Kershner and Larson (6) Nays: None (0) Absent: Weimer (1) Crawford asked staff to look at pre- existing residences and look at the date of September 20, 2005 in the rest of policy 2HH. The Committee will continue in this in two weeks. Think about having a special Committee of the Whole meeting on February 15, 2011. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 3:07 p.m. Please contact the Council Office to obtain an official, signed copy: 360- 676 -6690 or council &o.w hatcom .wa.us Dana Brown - Davis, Council Clerk Sam Crawford, Council Chair Special Committee of the Whole, 1/25/2011, Page 6