HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil March 25 20141
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
Regular County Council
March 25, 2014
CALL TO ORDER
Council Chair Carl Weimer called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. in the Council
Chambers, 311 Grand Avenue, Bellingham, Washington.
ROLL CALL (7:04:52 PM)
Present: Barbara Brenner, Ken Mann, Sam Crawford, Carl Weimer, Pete
Kremen, Rud Browne and Barry Buchanan.
Absent: None.
FLAG SALUTE
ANNOUNCEMENTS
(7:04:42 PM)
Weimer announced there was discussion with Chief Civil Deputy Prosecutor
Daniel Gibson regarding pending litigation, Quarries v. Whatcom County (AB2014-
018) and discussion with Senior Deputy Prosecutor Karen Frakes regarding
pending litigation before the Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) and
pending judicial appeals from GMHB decisions (AB2014 -018) in executive session
during the Committee of the Whole meeting.
MINUTES CONSENT
(7 :05:29 PM)
Buchanan moved to approve the minutes consent items.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
1. BOARD OF HEALTH FOR FEBRUARY 4, 2014
2. SURFACE WATER WORK SESSION FOR FEBRUARY 18, 2014
3. REGULAR COUNTY COUNCIL FOR FEBRUARY 25, 2014
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
SPECIAL PRESENTATION
1. QUARTERLY REPORT FROM THE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH REVENUE ADVISORY
COMMITTEE, PRESENTED BY JACKIE MITCHELL, WHATCOM COUNTY HEALTH
DEPARTMENT (AB2014 -124) (7:06:03 PM)
Wendy Jones, Chief Corrections Officer of the Whatcom County Jail, introduced
Jackie Mitchell of the Whatcom County Health Department.
Jackie Mitchell, Whatcom County Health Department, gave a report on the Jail
behavioral health program. The corrections staff are always respectful and professional
toward the inmates. This program is a good example of government collaboration with
nonprofits and interdepartmental collaboration. There are two licensed mental health
clinicians and one associate licensed clinician who provide services in the jail. The Health
Department and corrections staff work together to keep the system running smoothly. She
referenced and read through the report beginning on Council packet page 126.
Brenner stated jail programs are excellent. She asked about the Behavioral Health
Advisory Committee and the Revenue Advisory Committee. Mitchell stated she will get and
provide that information from Ann Deacon.
Crawford asked if they are engaged with the Sheriff in planning for the new jail.
Mitchell stated the Chief involved different people on many different aspects of the jail.
They really need confidential space in order to improve treatment. Right now, the clinicians
talk to the inmate in the cell.
Browne asked if it's now possible to enroll an inmate in State healthcare. Mitchell
stated it's complicated. Chief Jones is working on healthcare signup. It won't alleviate
direct costs in the jail, except when someone is hospitalized.
Bill Elfo, Sheriff, stated they've discussed with the Prosecutor the feasibility of
enrolling inmates under the Affordable Care Act. It was determined it would be a gift of
public funds, so they can't pay routine ongoing insurance premiums while they are not in
jail, but the County can pay the premiums while inmates are in jail. State Medicaid rules
changed recently. If someone is admitted to the hospital for 24 hours or more, Medicaid
will pick up those extraordinary costs.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. ORDINANCE ALLOWING, ON AN INTERIM BASIS, MARIJUANA PRODUCTION,
PROCESSING, AND RETAILING AS AUTHORIZED BY WASHINGTON STATE
INITIATIVE 502, AND MEDICAL MARIJUANA FACILITIES AS AUTHORIZED
UNDER CHAPTER 69.51A RCW (AB2014 -074B) (7 :18:13 PM)
Nick Smith, Planning and Development Services Department, gave a staff report.
Weimer opened the public hearing, and the following people spoke:
Jedediah Witham, Mt. Baker Homegrown and Farmers, stated he is a producer and
processor applicant who is affected by proposed setbacks for agriculture zoned land. This is
an opportunity to rebuild his farm after the market bottomed out and improve upon the
farm's environmental impact. Marijuana is an agricultural product that should be grown by
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
farmers, not by entrepreneurs or venture capitalists with no experience. His farm is subject
to all State security requirements. He welcomes using smell control because it benefits his
neighbors and deters potential thieves. He is opposed to applied setbacks. Agriculturally
zoned land should have priority over industrial zoned sites. Whatcom County has a right -to-
farm law. This proposal is in violation and against the spirit of this law.
Philip Dawdy, Agape Research, stated the company he represents has a proposed
producer and process project that will employ about 30 people in construction in the short
term and about 30 employees in the longer term. They are ready. They meet all the
buffers and would like to get going with the Planning Department on the permitting process.
Adopt the interim ordinance so the Planning Department has clear direction on how to work
with applicants. The buffer question isn't clear. Create a process for people who already
meet the buffer requirements to start moving forward with the Planning Department. They
are approaching construction season and would like to move forward.
Mark Landreth, Mt. Baker Greeneries, stated they have applied for a producer and
processor license. When they applied, they met all State requirements for location. With
the new setbacks, they will not be able to operate. Do not approve the setbacks.
Autumn McIntyre stated the rules and regulations of the Liquor Control Board are
more than sufficient. She opposes the new setbacks and restrictions.
Amy Glasser stated she supports applying the medical marijuana rules to
recreational marijuana. She disagrees with the setbacks and extra rules. The State
regulations are enough. Mandating setbacks from children perpetuates the myth that pot is
bad. Alcohol is more dangerous than pot, according to any statistic. There are no setbacks
to bars, where children can grab a drink off a table. Regarding smell, the Ferndale grain
mill and diesel trucks smell bad and are harmful. Regarding crime, baristas get robbed
more than medical dispensaries, which are all over the place and don't cause a problem if
well -run.
Jacob Lamont stated he had to move his retail shop out of unincorporated county to
Blaine to get around the setbacks. The Liquor Control Board rules and requirements are
enough. Security won't be a problem. Don't adopt the ordinance.
Craig Hearter submitted a handout (on file) and stated a neighbor has applied for a
grow and processing operation next door. The proposal is vested because the applicant
applied before the moratorium. Those laws were never intended to address what was an
illegal operation at that time. All the neighbors were there before the operation wanted to
move in, and they don't seem to have the same vesting right as residents of a rural
residential area. The neighbors don't want this next door. He asked why the neighbors
can't enjoy the rights of the zoning that existed before this business arrived, and what can
be done about it.
John Burns, Windpoppy Nursery Inc., submitted and read from a handout (on file)
and stated they applied for a producer and processor license for marijuana. The Liquor
Control Board rules are stringent enough. Don't adopt new ordinances. Applicants have
invested money, time, and resources to comply with State rules. New County rules at this
late time may prevent a plan from being successful.
Dave Welch stated hemp has many benefits. Hemp is the plant that can save the
planet. Hemp has historically been used for many things. It can reduce carbon footprint
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
and replace diesel fuel. It's a renewable product that doesn't harm the ground. He
recommended a book called Hemp Today.
Ryan Carpenter stated his family owns a greenhouse. He submitted a tier two
application with the Liquor Control Board for a production and processing license. The State
regulations are enough. This business venture is not a danger. Vote against the ordinance.
Tom Armstrong, Sideways Green, stated he is opposed to the setbacks. The State
was okay with their location, but now the County doesn't approve. Neighbors won't know
what is going on because the operation will be so quiet, well- maintained, and highly secure.
People have already invested thousands of dollars into their properties.
John Hill, Hilltop Grows, stated he also owns a marijuana consulting firm. Marijuana
advocates, not farmers, got this law approved. In Colorado, the main security flaw has to
do with the money. Banks won't take it, and there's no way to transport it. Rooms are
stacked with money. The Council might consider what to do with this income, because it
cannot be deposited into a federal bank. The idea was to make this use a small cottage
industry. State laws are strict enough. They seem to be forcing businesses into more
expensive vacant areas in the city. There is no violence to marijuana production.
Virgil Stremler stated the Council must take a hard look at what is happening with
zoning laws in Colorado and input from the Sheriff's Office. Protect the public. He supports
the zoning. The State should not keep all the tax money. It will bring in some crime. He
sees how much stuff comes across the border, and crime is involved. Forty -eight states
don't allow it, so they are going to have a healthy black market.
Jack Ingham stated he submitted an application for a producer and processor
license. He met all State requirements and invested a lot of time and money into his
business. The Liquor Control Board has made this a safe business. He is opposed to
setbacks, which will put him out of business. Go along with the Liquor Control Board
regulations and stop the moratorium. There are illegal businesses that have operated for
decades. The illegality of cannabis invites crime.
Eric Prinz stated his family wants to grow and process marijuana in the county. He is
opposed to the setbacks. The regulation will not allow him to operate. Look at each
property individually.
Steve Sarich, Cannibis Action Coalition Executive Director, stated these people are
just farmers. Leave them alone. His organization sued the City of Kent. If Whatcom
County tries to regulate collective gardens, does not remove the moratorium, and his
organization wins the case, he will sue Whatcom County. They plan to pass a new medical
marijuana law in January, which will be highly regulated.
Kelli Veening stated she supports the setback, zoning, and the moratorium. The
Liquor Control Board doesn't live in Whatcom County. There will be crime, especially if
rooms will be stacked with money. Look at the local issues.
Leonard Smit stated he supports the moratorium. They know there will be crime.
He doesn't want a tall chain link fence across from his front yard. Smell is an issue. He can
smell it now. His community didn't know this use was going into the neighborhood until the
last minute. It's legal, but it's still regulated, which throws out the argument that it's just
agriculture. His community has 15 to 20 kids within 1,000 feet of where a facility is going
to go. That's more kids than in most city parks. The spirit of the law is to protect the
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
community. They may call it agriculture, but he's allowed to drive around with corn, milk,
and raspberries without getting arrested. Continue to look at the regulations.
Lesa Starkenburg - Kroontje stated she represents the Clearbrook neighbors. She
supports the moratorium and reasonable regulations for zoning. Whatcom County may
create rational zoning and regulatory requirements. Frequently, the State has regulations
that do not offset what the County must do to protect Whatcom County from zoning issues.
Councilmember Crawford said they are dealing with a valuable product that is heavily taxed
and illegal in other places. That means there is potential for crime. The State clearly found
the potential for crime, which is the reason for all these site requirements. A buffer will put
more space between criminals and innocent people who live nearby. Property owners are
asking for reasonable buffers. The staff have compromised between what the Sheriff asked
for and nothing at all. Other agriculturally - related uses have setback requirements. The
Sheriff's suggested 1,000 foot buffer may have to do with travel time for Sheriff response.
There is a process by which people can change their location on their application. Protect
the rural character from wires, cameras, fences, and other things. Adopt the regulations.
Michelle Ketilsson stated the Liquor Control Board addressed concerns regarding
setbacks. A setback of 1,000 feet is more than enough. Without her knowledge or consent,
a gravel mine expanded in front of her home. This opportunity allows the community to
come together and discuss issues. There is a process in place for relocating.
Heather Wolf submitted handouts (on file) and stated she represents Mt. Baker
Greeneries & Sleeping Giant Nurseries. Do not adopt the ordinance tonight. There are no
licenses issued yet for producers and processors here. Enacting the ordinance will prevent
half the licensees from operating at the location for which they applied. No new rationale is
presented to justify the setbacks. The setbacks aren't relevant to security or decreasing
crime. The Sheriff commented on the remoteness of these facilities, which will be made
worse by the new setback requirements, which will drive the facilities into the remote areas
of the county. Her client is within short response time for emergency services, and is not
located in an isolated area where crime can occur more easily. The State laws are
sufficient. Don't eliminate opportunities for family wage jobs. All licensees have to obtain
an administrative approval permit, which requires notice to everyone within 1,000 feet and
detailed administrator review.
Browne asked about State rules for physical security of operations, such as fencing.
Wolf stated she will provide that information.
Lonnie Bauman stated his neighbor has a proposed site for a marijuana
manufacturing business. Several children live nearby. Marijuana is not something he wants
his kids around for their health and safety. He is opposed to the site, which is at the hub of
a neighborhood with lots of children and families. The site will have to have a perimeter
fence and other features that make it look like a prison. That will be the center of the
neighborhood. The setbacks are appropriate. He understands it's an inconvenience for
licensees, but this will devastate this neighborhood.
Ronna Loerch stated she is opposed to the interim ordinance. Marijuana should not
be in the war on drugs, which has caused thousands of deaths and ruined families, and cost
jobs in the hemp industry. The ordinance implies that this substance is dangerous. Other
businesses get robbed. Growers will take the same precautions that banks take. The
substance is not as lethal as alcohol, tobacco, and guns. There is not a statistic of death
due to marijuana. A setback of 1,000 feet is too onerous. A school bus stop next to a
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
marijuana growing operation poses no danger to the children. There is no risk. Represent
the citizens, not Sheriff Elfo.
Steve Irving stated an operation in his neighborhood has a grandfathered
application. The operation will pull water from the aquifer next to their community well. He
is opposed to the neighbor's application. Have sympathy for people who are next to the
grandfathered locations.
Eric Murda, Green Stop, stated he cannot operate a business in a business area in
eastern Whatcom County because of the proposed restrictions. There are medical
marijuana cooperative grow sites that children walk by all the time, and most don't know
they're there. Law enforcement and prosecution will be alleviated because the drug is legal.
They've done everything asked of the State to be legal. They shouldn't have to ask for a
waiver from the neighbors. The industry will provide jobs and security requirements are
more than adequate.
Tawni Burdick, Green Liberty, stated she asks the Council to lift the moratorium.
Dirk Nance stated banks in the state are offering banking services to growers,
processors, and retailers. When the Council imposes a regulation, it must have a public
purpose for the regulation. It is not arbitrary and capricious. There is no reason for the
setbacks and buffers. The smell issue is a reasonable reason for a restriction, but setbacks
are not. They will find marijuana right now in every affluent neighborhood in town.
Hearing no one else, Weimer closed the public hearing.
(8:28:36 PM)
Crawford moved to adopt the ordinance. The security requirements are in the
Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 314 -55 -075. He supports the ordinance. Normally
he would find repulsive the idea of having to get approval from neighbors, but these people
already live in these areas. There may be potential for property values to be affected. If
money is to be exacted, the discussion with neighbors needs to be whether the use will
impact property values and quality of life and whether a financial amount can be assigned to
that loss. Because the use is new, negotiating agreement is reasonable. The setbacks are
not arbitrary and capricious. Three hundred feet and 1,000 feet are common
differentiations regarding residences. Many zoning codes require these kinds of setbacks for
conflicting uses.
Weimer stated that if the Council doesn't adopt this ordinance, the moratorium stays
in place and people who meet the requirements may begin. If adopted tonight, it will
impact people who can't meet these requirements. He asked if they are really delaying
anyone, because the State hasn't issued any licenses, when those licenses will be issued,
and whether the State would give a license to someone who doesn't meet local regulations.
Smith stated he doesn't know when those licenses will be issued. It's true that the State
may issue a license to someone who doesn't meet local regulations.
Weimer stated they are not holding up anyone now, but that could change tomorrow.
Smith stated that's correct.
Brenner stated she voted for the initiative and wants it to work. The unintended
potential consequences that could happen didn't occur to her. She knows a lot about
marijuana. It's naive to assume there couldn't be criminal activity associated even when it's
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
all legal. This is an interim ordinance. They can change the final ordinance that gives an
opportunity to allow others to operate while still requiring certain setbacks. There were
many good comments tonight, and they must get started on making it better. It won't take
six months to do that. They must do this carefully so it doesn't get ruined and they can find
the right balance. She will support the ordinance.
Mann asked Councilmember Brenner what are the biggest negative impacts.
Brenner stated legal or not, a valuable commodity is in one location. That attracts
crime. It's not like alcohol. Legal marijuana will be extremely expensive due to all the
taxes put on it.
Crawford stated a CNBC article "Robber Gangs Terrorize Colorado Pot Shops"
regarding issues in Colorado describes many problems there. Their sheriff and police
organizations are asking for more money, and the law enforcement problem is gaining
ground. He read from the article.
Mann stated he doesn't know the frequency of robberies compared to robberies of
any other business. He wants to know what exactly they are worrying about. No one has
told him exactly what is going to happen to the children if this is allowed.
Brenner stated all they have is anecdotal information. They don't have information
about legal marijuana, except sensational stories that she doesn't put a lot of stock into.
There are a number of people who are ready to begin and meet the rules that exist now.
Let them get started by adopting this ordinance. Work on a final ordinance that doesn't
infringe on others.
Browne stated people who applied for a production and processing license under
prior rules would not be able to operate in residential rural, residential rural island, or rural
forestry area, but the proposed changes would allow that processing to occur.
Mann stated they don't know exactly what they are worried about. There are fears
and unknowns. It's a powerful motivator. There isn't a straight line between seeing
marijuana grow and becoming a heroin addict. People don't become alcoholics from seeing
the use. With the huge setbacks, the operations will have to be located in remote areas far
from where the Sheriff can serve the facility. Mandating remote locations may be
counterproductive. He feels terrible about what they've done to these applicants, who are
on the cusp of doing great thing in terms of economic development and job creation. While
there is no clarity in the rules, they are violating every principle of good government when it
comes to economic development.
Weimer stated he is against the ordinance the way it is now. He has concerns that
the 1,000 -feet setbacks are arbitrary. He prefers to eliminate the facilities in rural
residential areas. They wouldn't allow any other large type of business to be built in the
middle of a residential neighborhood. He doesn't understand why they would allow a
21,000 square foot building with fencing and lights right next to a home. It went too far for
the rest of county, and he'd like to get rid of most of the setbacks and buffers. He's
struggling with whether or not they are better off passing it this evening so certain people
can get their businesses going, and then commit to preparing a new ordinance for final
approval within the next month.
Buchanan stated he agrees with Councilmembers Mann and Weimer. Applicants
understood the rules set up by the Liquor Control Board and thought they knew what they
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
were getting into. Then the rules changed. People are ready to go. Develop a good
ordinance soon, but passing a bad ordinance is worse than any one -month delay. He is
against the ordinance.
Brenner stated someone mentioned the smell. Many businesses do random drug
testing on their employees. People who inhale the scent can have a positive result on a
drug test. If that's not right, she would like to see that data. Big grow and retail operations
should have to have a filtration system.
Kremen stated he agrees that everyone who has come before the Council on both
sides is right. There are good arguments on both sides. This is a tough decision. The
citizens voted to support the initiative, but he also has serious concerns, including issues
with crime, regulatory challenges for the County, and costs to the taxpayer. He voted for
the initiative because he thought it would produce revenue for the County and help them
deal with challenges regarding clean water, public safety, and parks. However it will cost
the County money, because the State is choosing to keep all the revenue. None of the
revenue will go to cities and counties that have to enforce the regulations and put people
through an expensive criminal justice system. However, they should stop procrastinating.
He is okay with either passing the ordinance tonight or putting in committee and fine tuning
the ordinance. Get rid of some of the arbitrary setbacks that are not going to accomplish a
great deal. Tonight, he is inclined to pass the ordinance for those who are eligible and able
to begin their business now, and then work on improving the ordinance for others.
Browne stated most properties that don't comply are in the residential rural area.
Weimer stated there are ten applications in the residential rural zone. Five of those
were in the Lake Whatcom watershed, which is eliminated in this ordinance. The other five
could possible go forward. Under the current regulations, the setbacks and separation
probably eliminates most of those five in the residential rural zone. I think they are
protecting people. He was afraid the Council would create regulation that would allow a
21,000 square foot building with lights and cameras to locate in a dense residential
neighborhood in the county.
Browne stated his concern is about residential rural character changes that effect
existing residents, regardless of what the non - residential use would be that changes the
character. Residential landowners should have input on the character of the neighborhood
in which they live.
Mann asked if the Council could make changes to the interim ordinance tonight.
Karen Frakes, Prosecutor's Office, stated the hearing on an interim ordinance only
has to occur within sixty days of adoption. It can actually occur after adoption. They are
used to dealing with matters that have to have a public hearing before adoption. Interim
ordinances are different. They didn't have to have a hearing before adoption. The statute
says a hearing has to be within 60 days of adoption.
Weimer asked if they would still have to introduce an interim ordinance. Frakes
stated they would.
Mann stated the Council could make changes tonight, it would go into effect, and the
Council could have a hearing within 60 days. Frakes stated they could.
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Weimer asked what does and does not vest under this ordinance, and whether they
can add public safety requirements, such as armed guards, to existing businesses that are
vested under this ordinance. Smith stated they could not, if they've applied for a permit
from the County.
Weimer asked if that is a land use decision or a public safety and health decision.
Frakes stated that's something they'd have to think about. She's not sure they can or can't
do that.
Brenner asked if the County is able to require more restrictions after someone has a
permit and opens business. Frakes stated they can if it truly relates to public health and
safety.
Weimer stated they couldn't change the setbacks, but they may be able to require
better security.
Browne stated he cautions applicants to make sure they do investigation into water
availability and other matters. Don't assume that all it takes is a license from the Liquor
Control Board and zoning approval from the County.
Weimer asked if they must introduce an amended interim ordinance two weeks
before it's adopted. Frakes stated the interim ordinance, if amended substantially, would
need to be introduced.
Crawford stated that if they adopt the interim ordinance tonight, they don't have to
wait six months to change it. At least adopting this tonight allows folks to move forward.
They can introduce an ordinance with changes in two weeks. He encourages
councilmembers to allow the applicants who qualify under this ordinance to go ahead.
Buchanan stated he could support it tonight if they commit to working on an
ordinance as soon as possible.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
(9:07:25 PM)
Smith stated he would like councilmembers to send comments to him. He will
schedule a proposed ordinance in committee in two weeks, with plans to introduce a new
ordinance that night. Send him comments and notes by Friday.
2. ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 2012 -043, THE WHATCOM COUNTY
UNIFIED FEE SCHEDULE, TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGES TO WHATCOM
COUNTY CODE 2.27A, AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES (AB2014 -117) (9:09:20
PM)
Weimer opened the public hearing, and the following person spoke:
]oe Boyd submitted a handout (on file) and stated the fees need to be adjusted.
Create a non - resident fee. Bellingham residents pay fees for stormwater assessment and
the watershed. These fees keep going up. Bellingham residents pay enough fees to protect
the lake. Of 1,000 boats inspected, three were infected, and all three were from British
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Columbia. The states of Nevada, California, and Arizona all have infected lakes and aquatic
invasive species (AIS) fees that are relatively small. Inspections in those states are
aggressive, so the likelihood that a boat from there will infect Lake Whatcom is minimal.
There should be a fishing season fee, not an annual fee. The process now is porous and
doesn't accomplish much.
Hearing no one else, Weimer closed the public hearing.
Brenner asked if the City is present when boat brokers come in from other places.
Gary Stoyka, Public Works Department, stated the City has a contract to allow on-
water businesses that include training and initial inspections. The company has to provide
information about where the boats come from or if they're new. The boat brokers have to
pay fees that are set in the agreement.
Brenner stated she likes the idea of a non - resident fee. Stoyka stated they
considered it. It would be difficult. Most local people will know about the online education
course. It's a way to provide a discount to locals.
Brenner asked how they know the infected boats came from British Columbia.
Stoyka stated they may have known from the inspection.
Brenner stated a $25 cleaning fee seems low for someone who has invasive species
on their boat. Stoyka stated the County adopted the same fee as the City. They are
changing this program, which is in its infancy. They'll have to review the program at the
end of the year and make adjustments. If the boat is complicated, it will be sent to a local
marina. It can't be cleaned with just a power washer.
Brenner asked about staffing the stations all year long. Stoyka stated the stations
are staffed from April through October. That decision is based on a risk assessment. If
they want round the clock coverage at all entry points on the lake, it would be extremely
expensive. Most boaters come during the boating season. There is less risk of transmission
in colder water. Another option is to close the boat ramps, but the State Department of
Fish and Wildlife would have to cooperate to close its ramps.
Brenner stated the State should do inspections at the state borders. Stoyka stated
the State just adopted legislation that makes it more stringent, but it didn't go as far as
they'd hoped. There was originally money to help local jurisdictions, but it was withdrawn.
The State is moving in that direction.
Crawford moved to adopt the ordinance.
Brenner asked if this can be amended during the year. Stoyka stated they can.
They worked to get the fees to be the same as the City's fees.
fee.
Brenner asked if the Lake Whatcom Policy Group talked about these things.
Weimer stated it has.
Brenner stated someone who needs to have their boat cleaned should pay a higher
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Weimer stated there has been talk about that and they're tracking those things as
the program develops. Be careful of changing fees now, because they line up with the
City's fees. Next year they might be able to change fees.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
3. RESOLUTION REGARDING APPLICATION FOR TWO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS (AB2014 -116) (9 :20:51 PM)
(Clerk's Note: The CDBG required handouts were included in the Council's packet
and available to the public at the public hearing.)
Weimer opened the public hearing, and the following people spoke:
Sherry Emerson, Opportunity Council, stated she supports the resolution. There are
two applications. She described the public services application.
Brenner asked what a moderate income is. Emerson stated it is a left -over phrase
from a Housing and Urban Development (HUD) statute. They primarily serve very low -
income populations in east Whatcom.
Wade Gardner, Opportunity Council, described the moderate home rehabilitation
grant application.
Ellen Baker stated Whatcom County should make these programs part of Whatcom
County government to make them more open and transparent to the public.
Paul Schissler stated he supports both applications. The community development
block grant (CDBG) program brings federal funding back to Whatcom County. This hearing
is required as a prerequisite for the application. Last week the Department of Commerce
released an economic opportunity grant program guideline, which is an additional
opportunity for the County, if the project benefits low income people who use the food bank
network. One out of five residents use the food bank network at least once. Many families
rely on the food banks system. The food bank network attempts to bring in healthy food
and fresh locally grown food. They can extend the season to produce more local healthy
food with hoop houses and greenhouses that can be built with CDBG funding if the County is
willing to apply and local agencies will administer this project. He'd like to talk to the
Council in the future about this concept.
Hearing no one else, Weimer closed the public hearing.
Kremen moved to approve the resolution.
Brenner asked if nonprofits have to be open and transparent to receive government
grant money. Emerson stated there are many reporting requirements.
Kremen stated he supports this resolution. The CDBG program is under a lot of
stress and is being threatened in Congress. Make sure this program continues. He will talk
with key congressional leaders and White House officials in a few months to make sure the
program stays intact.
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Crawford stated the Opportunity Council board meetings are open to the public. It is
is a great diverse group. These grants have another level of review also through the
Council of Governments. It's not the County's process. He's not sure the County should
take on that level of management. The Opportunity Council board does a great job. Their
ethic is to get the maximum number of dollars to the people who need it, not to pay a
bunch of staff and overhead.
Mann stated he agrees with Councilmember Crawford about the Opportunity Council
board. He's seen the presentation on Mr. Gardner's program, which is outstanding. They
do a lot with few funds.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
4. ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHARGES /FEES FOR PROVIDING ADVANCED
LIFE SUPPORT (ALS) AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES IN WHATCOM
COUNTY (AB2014 -121) (9 :34:47 PM)
Weimer opened the public hearing, and the following people spoke:
Gary Russell, Fire District 7 Chief, stated he supports the ordinance. It is a
component of the reorganization of advanced life support (ALS) and basic life support (BLS)
services in Whatcom County. District 7 already did a fee increase. The Technical Advisory
Board (TAB) reviewed and recommends the ordinance. Fees were adjusted according to
allowable rates from Medicare, Medicaid, and insurance companies. There was about
$35,000 of revenue that they were not collecting.
Brenner asked if Medicare pays if they increase the fees. Russell stated they bill at
the rates that will be approved by Medicare or Medicaid. Medicare will pay a percentage of
those rates, and the patient will not be billed for the additional amount. They have to
accept the amount that Medicare or Medicaid pay. They also bill insurance companies.
Buchanan asked the difference between the ALS 1 rate and ALS 2 rate. Russell
stated different types and intensity of procedures are performed.
Crawford stated that all the Council is being asked to approve tonight are the ALS
recommendations. The BLS fees are up to each fire district.
Browne asked if Medicare pays a percentage or the full fee. Russell stated Medicare
never pays the full amount. They pay a set amount.
Rob Roy Graham, Fire District 14 Commissioner and Emergency Medical System
Oversight Board (EOB) Member, stated the district and the Board approve the increased
fees.
Hearing no one else, Weimer closed the public hearing.
Jack Louws, County Executive, stated that the TAB recommends the fees. The EOB
approved the fees, but didn't have an opportunity to approve the definitions included in the
substitute version. He recommends that the Council adopt the ordinance tonight with the
understanding that they will go back to executive committee for their approval. It was
necessary to get this done as soon as possible. The fees will total about $175,000 to
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
$225,000 in fee revenue annually. The fee increase is incorporated in the budget
breakdowns he's presented in the past year and a half.
Crawford moved to approve the ordinance with the substitute pages.
Browne asked the fees and about fee collection from uninsured patients. Louws
stated the insurance companies will pay the full fee. They'll also charge that amount to the
uninsured. The collection rate for the uninsured is lower. Because Medicaid and Medicare
pay such a small amount, the system is now being reimbursed less than $2 million annually,
down from $4 million, for the same amount of work. The fees reimbursed continue to go
down. Consequently, the medical industry is raising fees for those who can pay and have
insurance. They subsidize the federal government's original promise of paying what is
required. They need to be treated fairly about the costs of the programs. It is an un- levied
tax on people with insurance.
Kremen stated Washington State has received a very low reimbursement rate for
Medicare and Medicaid from the federal government, compared to other states with a lot of
political influence. He and the County Executive are trying to convince the congressional
delegation to make reimbursements more equitable. Senator Cantwell indicated that she
and other members of Congress will try to reduce the disparity among states and make
reimbursements more equitable. He referenced Exhibit A and asked why they are only
charging $.15 per mile, when the federal reimbursement rate is $.56 per mile. Russell
stated the rate is $15 per mile, not 15 cents per mile.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
Louws stated he's pleased that Whatcom County, Fire District 7, and the City of
Bellingham have all passed these fee increases unanimously. Everyone in the community
has the same rates. The EMS program is going quite well at this time.
(Clerk's Note: The Council took a break from 9 :49 p.m. to 9 :57 p.m.)
(9 :57 :23 PM)
OPEN SESSION
The following people spoke:
• Matt Paskus submitted handouts (on file) and spoke about amending the
Whatcom County Code regarding the airport to provide people protection from
the growing airport.
• Peter Willing submitted and read from a handout (on file) regarding the
County's conditional use permit process.
• Kris Halterman spoke about water issues, packinghouses, marijuana
productions and processors, aquatic invasive species, and emergency services
response levels.
• Greg Brown spoke about allocating money for legal counsel and an EDI Board
recommendation to modify guidelines to add single and multi - family home
construction as an allowable use (AB2013 -332).
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
• Linda Twitchell, Building Industry Association, spoke about an EDI Board
recommendation to modify guidelines to add single and multi - family home
construction as an allowable use (AB2013 -332).
• Daniel Probst submitted a handout (on file) and spoke about the reconveyed
lands around Lake Whatcom.
• Perry Eskridge, Whatcom Realtors, spoke about allocating money for legal
counsel and an EDI Board recommendation to modify guidelines to add single
and multi - family home construction as an allowable use (AB2013 -332).
• Ellen Baker spoke about allocating money for legal counsel and an EDI Board
recommendation to modify guidelines to add single and multi - family home
construction as an allowable use (AB2013 -332).
• Paul Schissler spoke about an EDI Board recommendation to modify guidelines
to add single and multi - family home construction as an allowable use (AB2013-
332).
CONSENT AGENDA
1. REQUEST APPROVAL FOR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE TO ENTER INTO A
CONTRACT AMENDMENT BETWEEN WHATCOM COUNTY AND THE CAMP
HORIZON FOUNDATION FOR THE OPERATION OF BAY HORIZON PARK
(AB2014 -122) (10 :24 :14 PM)
Crawford reported for the Finance and Administrative Services Committee and
moved to approve Consent Agenda item one.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
2. REQUEST APPROVAL FOR THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE TO ENTER INTO A
CONTRACT BETWEEN WHATCOM COUNTY AND HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR DESIGN AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR THE
LOWER CANYON CREEK SALMON HABITAT RESTORATION/ FLOOD HAZARD
MANAGEMENT PROJECT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $59,027 (AB2014 -123)
(Council Acting as the Flood Control Zone District Advisory Committee.)
Crawford moved to approve the request.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
OTHER ITEMS
1. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2014 WHATCOM COUNTY BUDGET, EIGHTH
REQUEST, IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,053,575 (AB2014 -114) (10 :25 :28 PM)
Crawford reported for the Finance and Administrative Services Committee and
moved to adopt the ordinance.
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Brenner stated she would like to vote on the budget items separately. Big
controversial items should be voted on separately.
Weimer stated the Council cannot vote on the items separately, so the motion is out
of order.
Crawford stated the Executive is bringing forward items the Council already
approved.
Brenner moved to amend to remove the north Bellingham regional stormwater
facility in the amount of $2.5 million.
The motion to amend failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, and Kremen (3)
Nays: Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, and Weimer (4)
Mann moved to amend to remove $6 million for the Lynden treatment plant.
Jack Louws, County Executive, stated the County has a signed contract obligating
the funds. This is a transfer of funds to be able to release the funds. The County will be in
breach of contract if this is held up.
Mann stated he's voted against this for two years.
Browne asked if they are already doing the work. Louws stated they are. This is a
$4 million loan and a $2 million grant. He's said that if he were a member of the EDI Board,
he would not have been in favor of it. It's too much for one entity. However, they've gone
through the process and the Council approved the contract.
Brenner stated she supports the reconveyance item, because that moves the money
that's already been spent, even though she didn't support it.
The motion to amend failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Weimer and Mann (2)
Nays: Brenner, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, and Kremen (5)
Brenner stated she can't vote for the ordinance with these items included. It's
disrespectful to the public.
Weimer moved to remove $40,000 for outside legal counsel. The plaintiff's
indicated that settlement is possible, and it would be quicker and cheaper in the long run.
Mann stated he supports the funding for legal counsel, but they don't need to pay for
Seattle attorneys. He's not talking about backing out. Settlement is an option. He will vote
against the entire ordinance because the EDI funding is consistently a problem for him. He
will vote for the motion to remove funding for legal counsel and hope they approve it in
another ordinance, because he will vote against the entire ordinance tonight.
The motion to amend failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Weimer and Mann (2)
Nays: Brenner, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, and Kremen (5)
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Mann stated he supports the legal case, but he won't support the ordinance because
it includes the EDI funds.
Brenner stated she supports the legal case also, but she won't support the regional
stormwater facility. It's not right to vote this way, and hopes everyone will not vote for all
this money to be spent.
Weimer stated he will also vote against the ordinance.
Browne stated the funding for legal counsel can be used for the case or for
settlement negotiations, for which they'll probably need specialized legal counsel. It's
actually cheaper to hire a lawyer who specializes in water law rather than pay for someone
local who is inexperienced and needs to get up to speed.
The motion to adopt carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, and Kremen (4)
Nays: Brenner, Mann, and Weimer (3)
2. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE WHATCOM COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ZONE
DISTRICT 2014 BUDGET, SECOND REQUEST, IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,700
(AB2014 -115) (10:37:51 PM)
(Council acting as the Whatcom County Flood Control Zone District Board of
Supervisors)
Crawford reported for the Finance and Administrative Services Committee and
moved to approve the resolution. He is against the resolution. The Tribe caused this by
not giving the County access to the property and is the primary beneficiary of this project.
The County ought to have a discussion with them about covering some or all of this cost
before approving this.
Brenner stated the Mount Baker School District is another primary beneficiary. Don't
keep postponing this. The Nooksack Tribe has had problems and concerns recently. The
Tribe didn't cause this delay on purpose. Don't hurt the Mount Baker School District any
more by postponing this.
Mann stated his concern is not about this money. It's about the next time the
County has an agreement for a complex project that involves another jurisdiction, which
may not have incentive to cooperate with the County. He's very insulted on behalf of the
County, which is spending millions of dollars, and the Tribe is one of the primary
beneficiaries. They can't even get around to giving the County permission to go onto their
land to take measurements for the project. The County is also busy. It should have been
easy for the Tribe to grant the County access to the land. He wants the Tribe to reimburse
the County for the $42,700. He won't vote for this until there has been a conversation.
Weimer stated he agrees with Councilmember Brenner. There is a lot of benefit to
the school district. The staff has spent a lot of time on this, and it must move forward.
Don't delay. He understands the frustration with the Nooksack Tribe. They're not the only
government that has slowed down a project. It's time to move this forward.
Jack Louws, County Executive, stated the County has spent over $400,000 at this
time. If the Council decides not to approve the funding until the Tribe pays that overage,
the administration will try to collect the money over the next month. If the Tribe declines to
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
pay the money, the Council must know whether it will scuttle the entire project. He doesn't
like the situation. For practical purposes, holding this up for another year may put them out
of the cycle for federal and state funding for project construction. The County can articulate
the Council's displeasure to the Nooksack Tribe and use it as an object lesson.
Browne stated the Nooksack Tribe's delay caused a cost increase, and now he is
concerned because this delay may cause another cost increase, or the County may lose
federal funding opportunities, which is far greater than $40,000.
Brenner stated approve this resolution, and she will write a letter to the Nooksack
Tribe to express the Council's displeasure with the process. They don't know if the delay
was meant as an insult.
Mann stated sending a letter lacks force and is ineffectual. The Executive has
already left messages for the Tribe's chairman.
Crawford stated they aren't losing the $400,000. The dike has always been a
problem. They would have done an alternatives analysis either way. The work done to-
date does not preclude future work. It's been four years since the flood event. He doubts a
short delay will get them out of the cycle for 2015. The engineering work can still be done
for the 2015 construction season. If the Nooksack Tribe declined to contribute, he would
reconsider the project and all its aspects. A delay now won't negate the efforts made and
money spent up to now. There are options for addressing the issues in that area.
Kremen stated he is against the letter. It is well- intended, but ill- advised. The non -
response from the Tribe is probably unrelated to this project. The Tribe has a rare and
challenging situation with their governing board. The County should refrain from writing
letters than may not be appropriate. This project needs to be funded. The County should
fund it as soon as possible. Continue to make efforts to work with the Tribe in a positive
way. He hopes the issues on the Nooksack Tribe Council will pass soon.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (5)
Nays: Crawford and Mann (2)
3. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
INVESTMENT (EDI) PROGRAM — EDI BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO MODIFY
GUIDELINES TO ADD SINGLE AND MULTI - FAMILY HOME CONSTRUCTION AS
AN ALLOWABLE USE (AB2013 -332) (10:51:50 PM)
Crawford reported for the Finance and Administrative Services Committee and
moved to approve the Economic Development Investment (EDI) Board recommendation.
Mann stated he is against the proposal. The EDI fund is mislabeled, because it's
more like an infrastructure slush fund. They haven't had very many projects over the years
that seemed really in the spirit of the purpose of the EDI fund. He's been bothered by this
project from the beginning. A lot of good could come from it, but it's not legitimately about
economic development investment.
Brenner stated she felt the same as Councilmember Mann, but she's learned that the
data shows it provides housing for people who want to get decent jobs in Whatcom County.
The rental housing will come to the Council for final approval, unlike the single family
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
homes. The Council must have a specific Committee of the Whole meeting to discuss
Council policy on how to use EDI funds.
Browne stated they need to have a more conscious approach for using EDI money.
He will support the effort to provide people with housing access, although he's been
reluctant to believe EDI money is the right way to fund this project.
Kremen stated Perry Eskridge's comments on this issue were valid and impactful. He
was undecided, but has now decided to support it. It's clearly allowable under law.
Economic development benefits are associated with this expenditure.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (5)
Nays: Mann and Crawford (2)
4. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WHATCOM COUNTY CODE REGARDING LOT
CLUSTERING STANDARDS IN THE RURAL (R) DISTRICT (AB2014 -113)
(10: 57 :10 PM)
Crawford moved to adopt the ordinance. This is a Hearings Board compliance
issue.
Mann stated this went through the Planning Commission and Planning and
Development Committee.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (6)
Nays: None (0)
Abstains: Browne (1)
S. REQUEST CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE'S APPOINTMENT OF
BARBARA JUAREZ TO THE WHATCOM COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ADVISORY
BOARD (AB2014 -125) (11 :00 :56 PM)
Brenner moved to confirm the appointment.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
6. REQUEST CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE'S APPOINTMENT OF
DOUG BESTLE AND ROBERT WILSON TO THE WHATCOM COUNTY VETERAN'S
ADVISORY BOARD (AB2014 -126) (11 :01 :09 PM)
Mann moved to confirm the appointment.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
7. REQUEST CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE'S APPOINTMENT OF
TOM GOETZL TO THE WHATCOM COUNTY ETHICS COMMISSION (AB2014-
127) (11 :01 :23 PM)
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Mann moved to confirm the appointment.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
S. REQUEST CONFIRMATION OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE'S APPOINTMENT OF
ANNIE HONRATH TO THE BICYCLE/ PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
(AB2014 -128) (11:01:55 PM)
Brenner moved to confirm the appointment.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
9. COUNTY EXECUTIVE REQUESTS COUNTY COUNCIL APPOINT ONE OF THEIR
MEMBERS TO BE THE ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE ON THE WASHINGTON
STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES BOARD OF DIRECTORS (AB2014 -129)
(11:02:09 PM)
Kremen stated the Executive is on the Board of Directors, and he wants an alternate
to attend when he's not there.
Crawford moved to nominate and appoint Councilmember Kremen.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
COMMITTEE REPORTS
(11: 03:45 PM)
DISCUSSION OF AN INTERIM ORDINANCE RELATED TO PACKINGHOUSE
APPLICATIONS IN AGRICULTURE ZONES (AB2014 -060A)
Mann reported for the Planning and Development Committee and stated this item
was held in committee.
INTRODUCTION ITEMS
Brenner moved to accept the Introduction Items.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Brenner, Mann, Crawford, Browne, Buchanan, Weimer and Kremen (7)
Nays: None (0)
1. ORDINANCE INSTALLING STOP SIGNS ON ROADS WITHIN THE COUNTY
(AB2014 -131)
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
2. ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING WHATCOM COUNTY CODE SECTION
1.14, ELECTION PRECINCTS, TO AMEND CERTAIN ELECTION PRECINCT
BOUNDARIES, APPROVE NEW PRECINCT BOUNDARIES AS NECESSARY, AND
ADOPT A BOOK OF ELECTION PRECINCT MAPS BY REFERENCE (AB2014 -130)
OTHER BUSINESS
(11:04:51 PM)
Browne stated the Bellingham Airport Advisory Committee is being split into two
committees. He'll bring forward more information later.
Crawford stated he would like to go on the tour of purchase of development rights
(PDR) areas on a Tuesday in lieu of the regular surface water work session.
REPORTS AND OTHER ITEMS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
(11: 06:45 PM)
Mann reported that his interns are attending the meeting tonight in the audience.
Buchanan reported that he attended a healthy planning workshop last week. There
was discussion on health related policies to go into the 2016 Comprehensive Plan update.
The categories include healthy food access; social connectivity; injury, safety, and mental
health, and; physical activity. They discussed policies that could promote those items.
Crawford reported that he would like to have a local geologist, possibly Dan
McShane, give a presentation to the Natural Resources Committee on potential land slides
in Whatcom County.
ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 11:09 p.m.
The Council approved these minutes on May 6, 2014.
ATTEST:
, Council Clerk
-, Minutes Transcription
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL
WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Carl Weimer, Council Chair
Whatcom County Council, 3/25/2014, Page 20