The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutord2002-066II' HATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL NO. 2002 -084y CLEARANCES Inil Date Date Received in Council Qlhor Agsada Date Ass' tied tin Originator: staff W. Anson bla-D 2 2 p of IS C E J 1J h SEP 17 2002 i WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL gay O,Z Introduction Division Head: Sylvia Goodwin 1018102 Public Works Dept Head: Hal Hart 10 il 1 �V Prosecutor: Karen Takes I I I G Pnrcha,;ngiRudget: G� / Exe[adw Pon Kronen SUBJECT: Proposed amendments to the Six -Year Capital Improvement Program, Capital Facilities Chapter and Transportation Chapter (a%the Whalcom County Comprehensive Plan. ATTACHMENTS. (I) Proposed ordinance reflecting the Planning Commission's recommendations. Note: Background materials are available for review at the County Council ailing. SEPA review required? ( x ) Yes ( ) NO SEPA review completed? ( x ) Yes ( ) NO Should Clerk schedule a hearing? ( ) Yes ( x) NO Requested Date: 1 A hearing must he held if the Council changes the Planning Commission recommendation (WCC20.10.110). SUMMARY STATEMENT: State law requires Counties to review their comprehensive plans to ensure continued compliance with the Growth Management Act, Whatcom County has commenced this process and is bringing forward amendments to the Six -Year Capital Improvement Program, Capital Facilities Chapter and Transportation Chapters for consideration by the County Council. Note: The subject proposal is one of a number of comprehensive plan amendments initiated this year. These amendments must be considered concurrently by the County Council so that the cumulative effect of the various proposals can be evaluated (RCW 36.70A.130). Additionally, pursuant to the review schedule established in WCC 20.10.120, final Council action on these amendments should occur by November 30. Distribution Request Indiana those who shouldrecelvea coin after Council action. List.specPc names to the right. ADS Facilities Management ADS Finance ADS Human Resources ADS Info Services A33Pssor Keith Willnauer Auditor Cooperative Extension Dishier Coun Executive - Health Hearing Examiner Jail COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 2002 -84V 9/2412002: Introduced 10/8/2002. Held in commrnittee m 10/22 1012212002: Public hearing to be scheduled, 7 -0 1111212002. Adopted 6 -1, Brenner opposed Ord. #2002-066 �- Rehm Related File Numbers: A62002 -084 - Juvenile Parks planning Hal Hart Prosecutor Public Works Sheri Superior Court Treasurer Other Ordinance or ReDsolution NumMber ry 1y�I— (this item): I: 2 Planning Division Camp Plan Amen lmentsAComp Plan 2002CMP200 2 00018 (Six -Year CIP etc) -AB doc 8 -26 -02 SPONSORED BY: Planning PROPOSED BY: rianning INTRODUCTION DATE: 9/24/02 ORDINANCE # 2002 -066 AMENDING THE SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, CAPITAL FACILITIES CHAPTER AND TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER OF THE WHATCOM COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act requires counties and cities to review and, if needed, revise comprehensive plans to ensure continued compliance with the GMA (RCW 36.70A.130); and WHEREAS, It is also appropriate to review the comprehensive plan in light of new information and changed County priorities; and WHEREAS, Legal notice was published in the Bellingham Herald; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposal; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has evaluated the proposed amendments and made certain modifications; WHEREAS, The County Council has considered the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact & Reasons for Action, Conclusions, and Recommendations. The Council makes the following findings of fact and conclusions: FINDINGS OF FACT L Notice of the Planning Commission hearing for the subject amendment was published in the Bellingham Herald on April 25, 2002. 2. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject amendment on May 9, 2002. 3. A determination of non - significance was issued under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) on August 5, 2002. 4. Growth Management Act (GMA) planning goal # 12 is to "Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards" (RCW 36.70A.020(12)). M 5. The GMA, at RCW 36.70A.070(3), requires that the Comprehensive Plan include a capital facilities plan element. This element must consist of an inventory of existing capital facilities, a forecast of the Future needs for capital facilities, and the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities. It must also include a six - year plan that will finance capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identify sources of public money for such purposes. 6. County -Wide Planning Policy K -1 indicates that, as part of the comprehensive planning process, the County must identify appropriate land for public facilities which meets the needs of the community, including recreation, transportation and human service facilities. 7. The Whatcom County law & Justice Plan, Phase II Report, was issued in June of 2000. It recommends construction of a new minimum /medium security correction facility. 8. The Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan was originally adopted in May of 1997. Since adoption, Whatcom County has updated inventories of existing County facilities and evaluated the need for future capital facilities based upon adopted level of service standards and new population projections. Based upon the identified capital facility needs, a Six -Year Capital Improvement Program for the years 2003 to 2008 has been formulated, to replace the existing Capital Improvement Program for the years 2001 to 2006. 9. House Bill 1487 was passed by the State legislature in 1998. It required Counties to incorporate planning for state highways into local comprehensive plans, including level of service standards for state highways. 10. The level of service standards for highways of state -wide significance in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan are being revised so that they are consistent with the Washington State Highway System Plan, 2003 -2022, which was adopted in February 2002. 11. Whatcom County has several on -going planning processes that will influence the development of future capital improvement programs. These include the Essential Public Facilities Advisory Committee, the Law & Justice Council, and the County's long range facilities master plan. 12. The Lummi Island ferry did not meet the adopted level of service in the year 2000 and it appears that it would be difficult to meet the adopted level of service over the six year planning period. However, two planning documents will be prepared in the near future: An update to the Lummi Island Subarea Plan (that will address planned land uses on the Island) and a Lummi Island 20 -year Ferry Plan (that will address long -range ferry service to the Island). The Lummi Island Subarea Plan update will be accomplished first, so that ferry planning can be based upon the updated land use plan for the Island. P. 2 CONCLUSIONS I. The subject amendment is consistent with Growth Management Act, County Wide Planning Policies, and Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan goals that seek to provide adequate capital facilities to serve planned growth and development in order to maintain the community's quality of life. 2. The proposal is consistent with the public interest because it plans for adequate capital facilities to serve the community as it continues to grow. 3. The subject amendment is based upon further study and evaluation of the need for capital facilities over the next six years in Whatcom County. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with the RCW 36.70.410, which requires that Comprehensive Plan amendments must be based upon further study or changed conditions. 4. The subject amendment complies with the approval criteria for comprehensive plan amendments of WCC 20.10.080. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Whatcom County Council that: Section 1. The Six -Year Capital Improvement Program component of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as shown on Exhibit A. Section 2. The Capital Facilities Chapter of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as shown on Exhibit B. Section 3. The Transportation Chapter of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as shown on Exhibit C. Section 4. Adjudication of invalidity of any of the sections, clauses, or provisions of this ordinance shall not affect or impair the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. ADOPTED this 12 day of Nov. 12002 ATTEST: Dana Brown- Davis, Council Clerk APP OVED as to form: Civil Deputy Prosecutor Date: P. 3 WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON Ward Nelson; Chairperson ( pc},Y p ed O Denied Pete Kremen, Executive Draft 2002 Update Appendix F - Six -Year CIP 2003-2008 EXHIBIT A 10/22/02 Council Public Works & Capitol Projects Committee Recommended Version (with Council Public Works & Capital Projects Committee changes to the Planning Commission version shown with double underlines & double strike - throughs) SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2003 -2008 2001 2006 WHATCOM COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (APPENDIX F) Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS F -2 PAGE Chapter 1- Introduction ...... ..............................3 Chapter 2 - Parks, Trails, and Activity Centers ................. 6 Chapter 3- Maintenance & Operations ....................... 14 Chapter 4- Government Office Space ........................ 15 Chapter 5 - Sheriff's Office .. ............................... 19 Chapter 6 - Emergency Management/EOC ..................... 21 Chapter 7- Jails ........... ............................... 23 Chapter 8- Juvenile Detention ............................. 25 Chapter — Transportation .. ............................... 26 Chapter 10 -Total Costs .... ............................... 31 Location Maps ............. ............................... 33 Map F1 —Parks Map F2 — Trails Map F3 — Activity Centers Map F4 — Maintenance and Operations Map F5 — Government Office Space that Serves the Entire County Map F6 — Government Office Space that Serves Unincorporated Areas Map F7 — Sheriff's Office Map F8 — Emergency Management/EOC Map F9 Mails Map F10— Juvenile Detention Map F11 —Transportation Map F12 — Transit Routes F -2 - Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Chapter 1 -INTRODUCTION The Growth Management Act requires that the County's Comprehensive Plan include a "capital facilities plan element" (RCW 36.70A.070(3)). Capital facilities, as defined by the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan, include: ... all facilities owned by Whatcom County used directly or indirectly to serve the public interest. Those facilities typically have long useful lives, significant costs, and are not mobile. Whatcom County capital facilities include buildings, land, parks, and roads ... (p. 4-1). The Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan's capital facilities element (Chapter 4) calls for the County to develop and update the Six -Year Capital Improvement Program. The main purpose of this Six -Year Capital Improvement Program is to plan for adequate capital facilities to serve anticipated growth and development in Whatcom County over the next six years. It also provides information to decision makers regarding the costs of constructing capital facilities as the County continues to grow. Growth Management Act Requirements According to the Growth Management Act, a county's capital facilities plan must include five items, which are shown below. A. An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities. Current inventories of existing capital facilities, based upon information provided by various County departments, are included in each chapter of this document. B. A forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities. Chapter 4 of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan establishes "levels of service" for parks, administrative facilities (i.e. government office space), correction facilities, and transportation. Levels of service are expressed in acres of parkland needed for every 1,000 people in the County, square feet of government office space needed to serve each person in the County, etc. Forecasts of future needs for capital facilities over the six -year planning period are determined by applying the adopted level of service for a given facility to the expected population in the year 20086. For example, the adopted level of service for developed parkland is 9.6 acres for every 1,000 people living in Whatcom County. The County is expected to grow to about 190.948 184,230 people by the year 20086. Therefore, a total of 1 833 4;769 acres of parkland would be needed by the year 20086 to maintain the adopted level of service. Since we already have 1 611 4,594 acres of developed parkland, about 222 445 additional acres would be needed six years from now (in 20086) to meet the needs of the growing population. F -3 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update C. Proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities. Locations and capacities (i.e. acres or square feet) of proposed new facilities are shown in tables and on maps in this document. D. At least a six -year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes. This Six -Year Capital Improvement Program presents costs and funding sources for proposed capital facilities (all figures are in 20020 dollars). The Finance Manager for Whatcom County indicated that, over the six -year planning period, there would be little revenue in the County's General Fund to finance capital facilities. However, the capital facilities proposed in this Six -Year Capital Improvement Program are within the County's funding capacity. Specifically, according to Whatcom County's 20020 Final Budget, the County's unused long -term debt capacity is $165,319,497 444,769,754 (with limited tax general obligation bonds), which far exceeds the expenditures proposed by this Six -Year Capital Improvement Program. Therefore, it would be possible to issue bonds to pay for capital facilities if revenue is increased, expenses decreased, or programs reprioritized to make debt service payments. E. A requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Finally, in accordance with the Growth Management Act, a requirement to reassess the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure consistency between plans already exists in the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 4A -4). County Charter Provisions In addition to Growth Management Act provisions relating to capital facilities, Section 6.30 of the County Charter also requires the County Executive's Office to include a six -year capital improvement program as part of the budget. Chapter 10 of this Six -Year Capital Improvement Program shows how capital facility responsibilities are being met under both the Growth Management Act and the County Charter. V -4 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update Alternative Projects When the Six -Year Capital Improvement Program was being reviewed several year ago last yea , the Planning Commission requested that alternative projects be presented. This version of the Six -Year Plan has incorporated alternative projects where feasible. These alternatives could be implemented instead of a facility on the "improvement projects" list if priorities change or difficulties arise in implementing one of the proposed projects. Additionally, the alternative project list can serve as a vision for the future, beyond the six -year planning period. Master Facilities Planning The County administration intends to engage in a master planning process in the near future in order to achieve a more objective assessment of actual needs for County facilities. The master plan will provide a comprehensive review of capital facility needs over a 494o 20 year time frame and may result in significant changes to future six -year capital improvement programs. Contracting for Services Whatcom County contracts with other entities, such as the Council of Governments and the Northwest Regional Council, for vital community services. These contracts represent County participation in providing essential services, alongside other partners, without the need to construct County owned capital facilities, which can be very costly. Consolidated Services Building One of the proposed projects in this Six -Year Capital Improvement Program is a Consolidated Services Building which may be built in a location yet to be determined received Cr ve. This building would provide space for a number of County functions and, therefore, appears in several chapters of this document. The table below is intended to provide an overall view of the Countv functions that this hijildinn wni dd rnntnin Function Square Feet Office space that serves the entire County (including people in cities) 21,050 Office space that serves unincorporated areas only 20,950 Sheriff's Office 12,000 Emergency ManagemenUEmergency Operations Center 9,000 Total 63,000 Appendix F - Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Chapter 2 — PARKS. TRAILS, AND ACTIVITY CENTERS PARKS Existing Park Facilities The 20020 inventory of County parks shows a total of 1,611.50 1- ,594:50 acres of developed and /or usable parks at various locations throughout the County. This inventory, which does not include undeveloped parks that are not readily usable by the general public, is shown below and on Map F1. EXISTING PARKS Site No. Park Name Acres 1 Monument Park 8.17 2 Li hthouse Marine Park 21.66 3 Semiahmoo Park 20.27 4 Birch Bav Miscellaneous Pro erties .27 5 Sunset Farm E uestrian Center 69.50 6 Bay Horizon Park (portion not devoted to activity center 48.00 7 Hovander Homestead Park /Tennant Lake Interpretive Center 346.00 8 Northwest Soccer Park & Northwest Baseball /Softball Complex 35.00 9 Alderwood Pro Art .50 10 Be view Marine 2,15 11 Tedd Bear Cove 9.50 12 Chuckanut Mountain Prnnprhi 140.00 13 Pine & Cedar Lakes 157.00 14 Lummi Island StainNa .01 15 Samish Park 39.00 16 S wires Lake Park 84.00 17 Ted Edwards Park 3.68 18 Lake Whatcom Prnnnqw North 193.54 19 Park Head uarters 4.75 20 Silver Lake Park 411.00 21 Me le Beach Park .50 22 Deming Homestead Eagle Watching Park 14.00 23 Josh VanderYacht Memorial Park 3.00 Total 1.,61111..500 4-, OYb ME Appendix F - Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update Future Park Needs A level of service of 9.6 acres of developed parkland for every 1,000 people in the County was adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth in Whatcom County over the next six years, an additional 221.6 475 acres of developed /usable parkland would be needed by the year 20086 to serve the people of Whatcom County, Proposed Park Improvement Projects Four park improvement projects are proposed to provide additional developed and /or usable park space to meet the anticipated need by the year 20086 (not including the alternative projects). These projects would add 225 386 -te -180 acres of developed and /or usable park space in Whatcom County, as shown below and on Map F1. Financing for Park Improvement Projects The total cost of the four proposed park improvement projects is approximately $435.000 360,000 over the six -year planning period. These costs would be paid for through the Nesset Foundation, a levy, grants the !'mere, Fund, and donations from the Whatcom Parks and Recreation Foundation as shown below. F -7 Appendix F - Six Year OF 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 20037 -20086 Site Project Acres Year Year Year Year Year Year Total Funding No Funding No, 20034 20042 2005) 20064 20075 20084 Cost Source 20075 20084 Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost 242 Nesset 106 $755,900 $75;000 $30,999 $40..900 $.18.000 9 $200,900 Nesset $25,800 Farm 0 0 $30,000 GenerakF..n.. Land Trust Nelson Site 65' $5,000 $25000 0 Foundation 130 000 40 000 $40,000 20 000 20 000 20 000 270 000 253 East Acme 26-30 9 $511999 $25,800 0 0 0 $30,000 - ........ . ...... Farm 65' 15 000 NIA 9emtng 44 $4,900 $ 500 $400 $500 $500 $5.00 25 000 0 Levy ($15,000 and Grants 264 - Dittrich 24 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $12,500 $27,500 $100,000 5 000 Donations from Park Tot N/A 2g -qq $41000 Whatcom $26.500 $500 $500 $500 $23,500 N/A 65 15,000 Parks 8 0 0 0 0 30 000 Recreation Foundation ($75,000) and Gegera v Grants $25,000 275 Cherry 30 $55,009 $48,009 $10,000 $5,000 0 0 $38.;000 GeneraFF -und Point Industrial 0 5 000 10 000 $5,000 $5,000 $35,000 Levy ($17,500) Area and Grants Access 7 500 Tot N/A �5 $95.000 $;95.080 ggq.,gg0 $30.,000 $2.2,.500 $2500 $248,800 N/A -te 400 $150,000 $85,000 $65,000 $45,000 37 500 52 500 435 000 225 The total size of the East Acme Farm site is 262 282 acres. However, it is anticipated that only 65 acres will be developed as usable park space within the six -year planning period. ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS. 20ou.2nosa I Site Project Acres Year Year Year Year Year Year Total Funding No, 20034 20042 20053 20064 20075 20084 Cost Source Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost N/A Goodyear 24-30 0 $5,000 $25,800 0 0 0 $30,000 GenerakF..n.. Land Trust Nelson Site 65' $5,000 $25000 0 ($15,000) and Grants 15 000 NIA 9emtng 44 $4,900 $ 500 $400 $500 $500 $500 $3,508 General FURd Park Tot N/A 2g -qq $41000 $5.5500 $26.500 $500 $500 $500 $23,500 N/A 65 15,000 $25,000 0 0 0 0 30 000 The total size of the Goodyear Nelson site is 214 340 acres. However, only 25-20 65 acres would be developed as usable park space within the six -year planning period. This would be as an alternative to developing the East Acme Farm site. h -o Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update TRAILS Existing Trails Whatcom County currently has 47_45 42.45 miles of trails in various locations throughout the County. This inventory is shown below and on Map F2. EXISTING TRAILS Site No. Trail Name Miles 1 Hertz North Lake Whatcom Trail 3.1 2 Interurban Trail 5,9 3 North Lost Lake Trail 4.6 4 Teddy Bear Cove Trail .9 5 Pine and Cedar Lakes Trail 3 6 Hemlock Trail 3 7 Squires Lake Trails 3.7 8 Samish Park Trails 2 9 Semiahmoo Park Trails 2.4 10 Lighthouse Marine Park Trail .5 11 Silver Lake Park Trails 3.1 12 Hovander Homestead Park Trails 2.6 13 Tennant Lake Marsh Boardwalk 1.4 14 Northwest Complex Trail 25 15 Canyon Lake Creek Community Forest Trail 116 Total 47,45 F -9 Appendix F - Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Future Trail Needs A level of service of .75 miles of trails for every 1,000 people in the County was adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth in Whatcom County over the next six years, an additional 96 miles of trails would be needed by the year 20086 to serve the people of Whatcom County. Trail Improvement Projects Six Five improvement projects are proposed to provide additional trails to meet the anticipated need by the year 20086 (not including the alternative projects). These projects would add 110.67 1921.7 miles of trails in Whatcom County, as shown below and on Map F2. Financing for Trail Improvement Projects The total cost of the six Gve proposed trail improvement projects is approximately $781,000 752,999 over the six -year planning period. These costs would be paid for through Conservation Futures, a levy, grants donations thR,eo^crcl F,.nd, and the Whatcom Land Trust as shown below. F -10 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, 2003-1-20086 Site " Project Miles Year Year Year Year Year Year Total Funding No. 20037 20042 20053 20064 20075 20085 Cost Source Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost 16 Bay to 67 0 $ 125,000 $130,000 $100.,000 $100..000 $25,000 $500;000 Conservation Baker Trail Futures $75.00 100 00 $100,000 175000 $50,00 0 425,000 ($300,000), Levy ($62,500) and Grants 62 500 and General Fund 17 Chuckanut 30 $2,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3;000 0 $15,900 Levv Mountain ($19 and Trails 30000 0 39000 Grants ($19,500 18 - Hertz .17 9 $200,000 0 0 0 0 $200,000 Grants North Lake ($32 and Whatcom $65,000 0 $65,00 0 Donations Trail 500 Extension C32 ' enservatien F itaras 19 Canyea 5 0 $aaow 0 0 0 0 $20009 lhatsom Greek Lake COMMUR €nni Tips 19 Goodyear/ 1 0 $2000 0 0 0 0 $7,000 Whatcom 29 Nelson Land Trust Trail 7000 0 �d 20 Stimoson 2.5 20000 20000 5000 0 0 0 45000 Whatcom Nature Land Trust Reserve Trail 21 Coast 10 15 000 $20,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $15.00 0 200 000 Conservation Millennium Futures & Trail — Levv ($100,000 I Grants 00 000 Tat. N/A 110.87 $2, 009 $355,000 $gg2�9g0 $1g2�0g0 g1gg.,ggq $25000 $I52;00g N/A 212 000 1143.00 158 000 $128,00 0 100 000 40 000 781 000 F -11 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS, 20034 -20086 Site Project Miles Year Year Year Year Year Year Total Funding No. 20034 20042 20053 20064 20075 20085 Cost Source Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost N/A Nesset 4.5 0 $7,,000 $3 -;BOB 0 0 0 $10,000 a� Soulh Levv ($5,000) Fork 7,000 3,000 0 Land Trust Nooksack ($5,000) River Trail WA Ceas4 iB -te-32 $73;008 $26;889 $SB, BBB $x.890 $50 $16,900 6easervatien M , -;008 $294,900 Tea11•�•••o•••^ ($4W s ($704;000) Tot. N/A 14.5 to 16.5 $15,900 $23; 000 $53;000 $50,989 $50.;988 $1g.�ggp $2;g0g0 N/A 1 7 000 3 000 0 0 0 0 10 000 F -1L Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update ACTIVITY CENTERS Existing Activity Centers Whatcom County currently operates 12 43 activity centers that provide a variety of year -round programs for various age groups. The activity center inventory is shown on below and on Map F3. EXISTING ACTIVITY CENTERS Site No. Ac 1. Center Name 1 Plantation Rifle Range 2 Roeder Home 3 Bellingham Senior Activity Center 4 Blaine Community /Senior Center 5 Everson Senior Center 6 Ferndale Senior Center 7 Lynden Community Center 8 Point Roberts Community Center 9 Sumas Community Center 10 Welcome Valley Senior Center 11 Bay Horizon 12 Van Zandt Community Hall Future Activity Center Needs A level of service of six activity centers for every 100,000 people in the County was adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth in Whatcom County over the next six years, 11 centers would be needed by the year 20086 to serve the people of Whatcom County. Since 12 14 such centers already exist, no more will be needed within the six -year planning period. Proposed Activity Center Improvement Projects No activity center improvement projects are proposed within the six -year planning period. Financing for Activity Center Improvement Projects No activity center improvement projects are proposed within the six -year planning period. F -13 Appendix F - Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Chapter 3 - MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Existing Maintenance and Operations Space The 20020 inventory of maintenance & operations /facilities management space that serves the County is 36,087 square feet. This inventory is shown below and on Map F4. EXISTING SPACE Site No. Name Square Feet 1 Central Shop (Maintenance and Operations) 28,693 2 Public Safety Building (Facilities Management) 2,394 3 401 Grand Ave. (Facilities Management) 5,000 Total 36,087 Future Maintenance and Operations Space Needs A level of service of .41 square feet for each person who resides in an unincorporated area of the County was adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth in unincorporated areas of Whatcom County over the next six years, no additional space would be needed by the year 20086 to meet the adopted level of service. Proposed Maintenance and Operations Improvement Projects No improvement projects that would add usable space are proposed within the six -year planning period. Only maintenance projects are proposed Financing Maintenance and Operations Improvement Projects No improvement projects that would add usable space are proposed within the six -year planning period. Only maintenance projects are proposed MCM )endix F - Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 OFFICE SPACE THAT SERVES THE ENTIRE COUNTY Existing Office Space that Serves the County -Wide Population Draft 2002 The 20020 inventory of County government office space that serves, at least in some capacity, the population of the entire County is 133.871 1 -3842 square feet at six five locations. This inventory is shown below and on Map F5. EXISTING OFFICE SPACE Site No. Name S uare feet 1 County Courthouse (311 Grand Ave.) 96215 107,319 Administrative Services- 11 664 11,993 s.f. Assessor — 4568 4-,WG s.f. Assigned Counsel — 605 s.f. Auditor — 7 461 3385 s.f. County Council — 6 449 6;417 s.f. District Court — 11,9231 -1445 s.f. Executive — 2 277 2,425 s.f. Juvenile — 10402 25,937 s.f. Law Library — 2 244 2425 s.f. Prosecuting Attorney — 9602 8;449 Public Defender 4 687 4,390 s.f. Superior Court — 1956418;447 s.f. Treasurer— 4 669 4,220 s.f. 2 509 Girard St. 10751 1 Health & Human Services De t. 3 Forest St. Annex (1000 North Forest St.) 9 170 3392 Cooperative Extension — 3,Zf1 Q 3-542 4332 s.f. Health and Human Services — 2 128 2,738 s.f. Vacant — 3 4 f 4 1500 N. State Street (leased space) 7 685 7;685 Health and Human Services 5 3373 Mt. Baker Highway 2 110 2449 Parks 1, Recreation 6 Civic Center Annex (322 North Commercial) 7 640 Public Works (Water Resources) - 2,376 _ Public Defender - 1,698 Drug Court - 1,821 Juvenile Justice Center- 2,045 Total 133.871 138,342 Future Off ice needs to tierve the County -Wide Population A level of service of .71 square feet of office space per capita was adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. E4en -wWith projected population growth in Whatcom County Additionally, there are benefits . . . .. .... •r - . - -.. .- .. - - in different locations. F -15 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Proposed Office Space Improvement Projects Serving the County -Wide Population Two improvement projects are proposed to provide additional square footage to meet future needs and to consolidate County services. These projects would add 37 110 45,,050 square feet of office space to serve the entire population of Whatcom County, as shown below and on Map F5. If the existing Forest St. Annex (1000 North Forest St.), the County Health Department space (509 Girard St. and 1500 N. State St.), and the Parks & Recreation building (3373 Mt. Baker Highway) were no longer used for County offices, the net increase would be 7 394 14,027 square feet. Financing for Office Space Improvement Projects Serving County -Wide Population The overall cost of a or000sed the Consolidated Services Building is $5,950,000, but only a portion of this building would be used for office space that provides services to the County -wide population. These costs would be paid for through bonds as shown below. OFFICE SPACE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TO SERVE COUNTY -WIDE, 20034- 20085 Site Project Square Year Year 20042 Year 20053 Year Year Year Total Cost Funding No. Feet 20033 Cost Cost 20064 20075 2008 Source Cost Cost COSt 5 Cost 6 Civic Center 16 060 $850,;000 $850000 0 0 0 0 $850,000 Bono Annex Proceeds County Health Center 24,000 0 7 Consolidated 21,050 $100,000 $850,000 $5,000,000 0 0 0 $5,950,000 Bonds Services Building Parks - 7,000 s.f Cooperative Extension -7,100 s.f Other - 6,950 s.f. Tot. N/A 45050 $85Q000 $850.;000 $5,000,000 0 0 0 $6,800,000 N/A 37,110 100 000 1,700,000 The overall size of the Consolidated Services Building is planned for approximately 63,000 square feet. However, only 21,050 square feet would be utilized for office space that serves the County- wide population. F--lb Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update OFFICE SPACE THAT SERVES UNINCORPORATED AREAS Existing Office Space Serving Unincorporated Areas The 20029 inventory of County government office space that serves only the unincorporated areas of Whatcom County (that doesn't serve City residents) is 24,008 square feet at three locations. This inventory is shown below and on Map F6. EXISTING OFFICE SPACE Site No. NSquare SquaFeet Feet 1 Northwest Annex t Dr.) Planning and Deve8 -;863 s.f. 20238 20,,037 Public Works — 8 1 2 Civic Center Annex f322 North Commercial) 9 166 3696 wF 1 ntt . ct Public Works 3 County Courthouse (311 Grand Ave.) 246 27-5 Hearing Examiner Total 29 650 2416W Future Office Needs to Serve Unincorporated Areas A level of service of .51 square feet of office space per capita was adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth in unincorporated Whatcom County over the next six years, an additional 12283 14 -,025 square feet of office space would be needed by the year 20086 to serve the people of Whatcom County. F -17 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Proposed Office Space Improvement Projects Serving Unincorporated Areas One improvement project, a tha Consolidated Services Building, is proposed to provide additional square footage to meet the anticipated need by the year 20086. This project would add approximately 20,950 square feet of government office space that serves unincorporated areas of the County. on=Map F& Financing for Office Space Improvement Projects Serving Unincorporated Areas The total cost of a the Consolidated Services Building is $5,950,000. However, only a portion of this building would be devoted to government office space serving unincorporated areas. OFFICE SPACE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TO SERVE UNINCORPORATED AREAS, 20034.20086 Site No. Project Square Total Costs and Feet Funding Source 4 Consolidated Services 20,950 See p. & 19 for total Building costs and funding Public Works - 20,000 s.f. sources Hearin Examiner -950 s.f. The overall size of a the Consolidated Services Building is planned for approximately 63,000 square feet. However, only 20,950 square feet would be utilized for office space that serves the unincorporated population of Whatcom County. r -ts Appendix F - Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Chapter 5 - SHERIFF'S OFFICE Existing Sheriff's Office Space The 20029 inventory of Sheriff facility space is 27939 19 -,002 square feet serving the unincorporated population. This inventory is shown below and on map F7. EXISTING SHERIFF'S FACILITIES Site No. Site Name Square Square Feet Feet 1 Public Safet Buildin 14 707 9;473 2 401 Grand Ave. 9,865 6553 3 Point Roberts Fnrilih 197 3;1-76 Total 27,939 a -9,992 The Sheriffs Office also has a 4,032 square foot building adjacent the Central Shop that is used for evidence processing and the storage of vans, boats, and evidence. Future Sheriff's Office Needs A level of service of .26 square feet of Sheriff's Office space per capita was adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth in unincorporated Whatcom County over the next six years, no additional Sheriffs Office an addit onal 387 square feet Of office space would be needed by the year 20086 to meet the adopted level of service septa the pe9Pl8 of WhatcOrn Gaunt). Proposed Sheriff's Office Improvement Projects At the current time Gone Sheriffs Office improvement project is proposed to locate new year manna and ',n,. d b, ,oa . This project would add 12,000 additional square feet of space in the Consolidated Services Building to house Sheriff patrol office_, &s shQ • - an map R Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Financing for Sheriff's Office Improvement Projects The total cost of a the Consolidated Services Building is $5,950,000. However, only a portion of this addition would be devoted to serving Sheriffs office space. SHERIFF'S OFFICE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, 20034 -20085 Site No. Project Square Total Costs and Feet Fundin Source 4 Consolidated Services feet See p. 16 � for total Building costs and funding sources The overall size of a tqe Consolidated Services Building is planned for approximately 63,000 square feet. However, only 12,000 square feet would be utilized for Sheriffs office space. F -20 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update Chapter 6 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT /EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER(EOC) Existing Emergency ManagemenVEOC Space The Emergency Management /Emergency Operations Center (EOC), which serves the entire population of Whatcom County, presently occupies 2 458 4,916 square feet in the basement of the County Courthouse. This inventory is shown below and on Map F8. EXISTING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT /EOC FACILITIES Site No. Site Name Square Feet 1 Whatcom County Courthouse (311 2 458 Grand Ave.) Future Emergency Management/EOC Needs A level of service of .011 square feet of emergency managemenUEOC space per capita was adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth, no additional Emergency Management space 111 ad it ^nal squsq aFe feet would be needed to serve the people of WhatGom GGu4* by the year 20086 to meet the adopted level of service. However. Tthis space serves two purposes as daily office space for Emergency Management and, during an actual emergency, as an EOC. The Deputy Director of Emergency Management/EOC indicated that the existing facility is inadequate to function as an EOC during an emergency, when it may have to accommodate several hundred people in a single day. These people include a combination of elected officials, trained personnel and volunteers, who serve in a variety of capacities during the emergency. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines recommend an emergency facility of 7,000 square feet for a County of 150,000. The Deputy Director of Emergency Management/EOC indicated that 7,000 square feet would, in fact, be adequate to serve the anticipated population of Whatcom County in the year 20086. Proposed Emergency Management /EOC Projects One improvement project to provide space for Emergency Management/EOC is proposed to meet the anticipated need by the year 20086 and beyond. This project would allocate 9,000 square feet of space in the Consolidated Services Building to house Emergency Management/EOC and associated training /meeting facilities as shown below F -21 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Financing for Emergency ManagementlEOC Improvement Projects The total cost of a the Consolidated Services Building is $5,950,000. However, only a portion of this addition would be devoted to serving Emergency ManagemenUEOC. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT /EOC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, 20034 -20086 Site No. Project Square Total Costs and Feet Funding Source 2 Consolidated Services 9,000 See p. 16 48 for Building total costs and funding sources The overall size of a the Consolidated Services Building is planned for approximately 63,000 square feet. However, only 9,000 square feet would be utilized for Emergency ManagemenuEOC space. F -22 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update Chapter 7 - JAILS Existing Jail Facilities The existing County jail was designed for 148 beds, although it currently has 245 beds due to double bunking. Additionally, the jail is currently not in compliance with the Uniform Building Code for double bunking, although a plan has been approved mea; _re t)" fefmulated to bring it into compliance. Whatcom County also regularly contracts for 42 40 work release beds from Security Specialists Plus (SSP) Legal Support Services. Eight Tea additional beds are available at this site, and are used on occasion for an extra fee. The jail is located in the Public Safety Building next to the County Courthouse in downtown Bellingham and the SSP facility is located in the Bakerview Rd. industrial area, as shown on Map F9. EXISTING JAIL BEDS Site No. Name Beds 1 Public Safety Buildinq 245 2 Security Specialists Plus Facility 4240 Total 2872-95 Future Jail Needs A level of service of 1.42 beds for every 1,000 people in the County was adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth in Whatcom County over the next six years, a total of 271262 beds would be needed by the year 20086 to comply with the adopted level of service. Proposed Jail Improvement Projects While the County is currently meeting its adopted level of service for jail beds, there is concern about the space provided to serve the jail population. Because of this, a correction facility has been included in the capital improvement program approved under Section 6.30 of the County Charter for the last five three years. Additionally, the Whatcom County Law & Justice Plan Phase II Report (June 2000) recommends constructing a new correction facility. Therefore, a minimum /medium security correction facility is included in this capital improvement program. However, -a A location for the facility has not yet been determined. F -23 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Financing for Jail Improvement Projects The total cost of the proposed correction facility is approximately $10,000,000 $8,000,,009. These costs would be paid for through bonds. Total Cost JAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TO SERVE COUNTY -WIDE, 20030 -20085 Slte Project Beds Year 2003 Year 20042 Year20053 Year Year Year Total Cost Funding No Cost Cost Cost 2006 2007 2008 Source 4 5 6 Cost Cost Cost N/A Minimum/ 290 $250,000 $3,500,000 6250000 0 0 0 $10.000000 Bonds and fund LMedium Security $4- X50,800 $8,000;000 baance Corrections (savings) Facility F -24 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update Chapter 8 - JUVENILE DETENTION Existing Juvenile Detention Facilities The 20020 inventory of County juvenile detention facilities includes 31 beds serving the county -wide population. The juvenile detention facility is located on the sixth floor of the County Courthouse at 311 Grand Avenue, as shown on Map F10. EXISTING JUVENILE DETENTION BEDS Site No. Name Beds 1 County Courthouse — 311 Grand Ave. 31 There is one additional bed used for short periods of isolation for behavior modification, but this bed is not used to provide housing for juvenile offenders. Future Juvenile Detention Needs A level of service of .165 beds per 1,000 population was adopted in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. With projected population growth in Whatcom County over the next six years, no additional beds would be needed by the year 20086 to meet the needs in Whatcom County at the currently adopted level of service. The level of service was lowered several years ago last ea pending the outcome of the Whatcom County Law and Justice Plan. The Whatcom County Law and Justice Plan Phase II Report (June 2000) recommends "continuing evaluation of the need for an additional 30 beds for juvenile offenders." However, it does not include a specific recommendation to construct additional juvenile facilities. With anticipated population growth, the Countv will Proposed Juvenile Detention Projects No improvement projects are currently proposed within the six -year planning period. Financing for Juvenile Detention Improvement Projects No improvement projects are currently proposed within the six -year planning period. F -25 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Chapter 9 - TRANSPORTATION ROADS Existing Roads The 2001 2009 inventory shows a total of 950.23 948.66 miles of County roads. Additionally, there are 212.40 2-10.5 miles of state highways in Whatcom County (including 1 -5). Therefore, there is a total of approximately 1,163 1,459.1 °.'6 miles of public roads in Whatcom County. This inventory is shown on Map F11. Future Road Needs The Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan states that: A roadway's "level of service" is a measure of how full of traffic it is. It is the ratio of the actual volume of traffic to the maximum amount of traffic the road could hold. Levels of service range from completely unrestricted flow of traffic (level "A ") to stop - and-go traffic jams (level 7 "). At level of service "C" the road is 70% to 80% full. The flow of traffic is generally stable, though individual users are significantly affected by the presence of other vehicles (p. 6 -4). The Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan sets the following levels of service (LOS) for County roads: • A volume -to- capacity ratio of 0.75 (LOS of C- minus) during p.m. peak hours for county arterials and collectors located outside of City Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). • A volume -to- capacity ratio of 0.8 (LOS of D) for arterials and collectors within County Unincorporated UGAs. • A volume -to- capacity ratio that offers a reasonable transition for roads located within City UGAs. • A level of service for roads located within city urban growth areas consistent with those set by the city. • A level of service for arterials and collectors that is adequate to accommodate efficient transit service (pp. 4 -6, 6 -4, and 6 -5). F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 IF! 11 1,11@1 1!1111!1111111� 4} indicates: a day) ... Similarly, the Whatcom 6eunty-Regiena! Transportation Plan - A Combined Metropolitan and Regional Plan (2001) Lodate -(1996 indicates a LOS of C for state routes in rural areas and a LOS of D for state routes in cities and urban -areas urban growth areas (p. 27 7). Roth of these n • •�,.�be updated 600R. Arm ON 04 OR W "i MM_ However, there is a need to continuously plan for County road improvements, prior to the time the next T4Amodel can be run. Whatcom County accomplishes this planning by approving a Six -Year Comprehensive Road Program each year, as required by RCW 36.81.121. Appendix F - Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Proposed Road Improvement Projects The Whatcom County Council adopted the Six -Year Comprehensive Road Program for the Years 2003 20021 Through 20088 28976 under Resolution No. 2002 -031 2801- 9374990- 939. This six -year plan includes preliminary planning for three proposed new road projects and numerous reconstruction projects. The three proposed new road projects stud ed are: • Slater Road Connector (Northwest Dr. to City Limits) • Grandview RoadiWest Pole Road Connector • Whatcom Connector (Yew Street Rd. to Lake Louise Rd). While these three possible projects are on the Six -Year Comprehensive Road Program, construction is not anticipated within the six -year planning period (2001 -2096). Rather, preliminary engineering to determine project feasibility may w®uld be completed within this time frame. Financing for Road Improvement Projects The total cost of the County road projects, including reconstruction projects, on the Six - Year Comprehensive Road Program is S47 592 000 . These costs include $35 031 000 of County funds, with the remainder being funded by the State and Federal governments. A specific breakdown of these costs and revenue projections for road construction are shown in Resolution 2002 -031 2004-037 2990 036. Staff notes: 1. The proposed language is intended to clarify that the three road projects might be studied during the six -year planning period, depending on funding and future County Council decisions. (The Council expressed concern about this item at the Public Works & Capital Projects committee meeting of 10- 8 -02). 2. The Planning Commission considered this six -year capital improvement program in May of 2002, but the new six -year transportation improvement program was not approved until July of 2002. Therefore, staff has inserted the information from the most recent six -year transportation improvement program in the text above. F -28 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update LUMMIFERRY Existing Ferry Facilities Whatcom County currently has one ferry vessel serving Lummi Island. The ferry runs between Lummi Island and Gooseberry Point on a daily basis. The ferry route is shown on Map F11. Future Ferry Needs The 1997 Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan sets a level of service of 513 ferry passenger trips annually per capita of Lummi Island population. It is projected that Lummi Island will have a population of approximately 932 790 people in the year 20086 (compared to the 2000 1990 census population figure of 812 629). Based upon this population projection, the ferry would be expected to make carry 478.116 405,270 passenger trips annually by the year 20086 to meet the level of service set by the County. In 2001 1999, there were a grand total of 380.915 3.78,507 passenger trips, which included vehicles, trucks R trailers, bikes, motor cycles, and pedestrians. Therefore, the ferry would have to provide almost 100.000 more passenger trips annually by the year 20086 to meet the level of service standard set by the County. It appears that it would be difficult to meet the adopted level of service over the six year planning period However, two planning documents will be prepared in the near future- 3 The Lummi Island Subarea Plan update will be accomplished first so that ferry planning can be based upon the updated land use Plan for the Island F -29 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Proposed Ferry Improvement Projects Financing for Ferry Improvement Projects There are no ferry improvement projects proposed within the six -year planning period that would increase the capacity of the ferry. The twe Projects eR the c' . F -30 F - Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update Chapter 10 - TOTAL COSTS Six -Year Capital Improvement Program Costs 2003 -2008' Project Name 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total for the six year period PARKS Nesset Farm 130,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 $270,000 East Acme Farm 5,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 $30,000 Dittrich Park 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 12,500 27,500 $100,000 Cherry Point Industrial 0 5,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 $35,000 Area Access TRAILS Bay to Baker Trail 75,000 100,000 100,000 75,000 50,000 25,000 $425,000 Chuckanut Mountain 30,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0 $39,000 Trails Hertz North Lake 65,000 0 0 0 0 0 $65,000 Whatcom Trail Extension Goodyear /Nelson Trail 7,000 0 0 0 0 0 $7,000 Stimpson Nature 20,000 20,000 5,000 0 0 0 $45,000 Reserve Trail Coast Millennium Trail 15,000 20,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 15,000 $200,000 PROPOSED NEW STRUCTURES Consolidated Services 100,000 850,000 5,000,000 0 0 0 $5,950,000 Building New Minimum /Medium 250,000 3,500,000 6,250,000 0 0 0 $10,000,000 Security Corrections Facility 401 Grand Ave. 0 0 0 2,150,000 0 0 2,150,000 - Parking & Office IT rovements EXISTING STRUCTURES Civic Center Annex 0 425,000 425,000 0 0 0 $850,000 Public Safety Building 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 $350,000 - HVAC Equipment Replacement Public Safety Building 0 0 170,000 0 0 0 $170,000 1 - HVAC Controls/ Enerav M mt Public Safety Building 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 $250,000 - Electrical Upgrades with New Generator Public Safety Building 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 0 $1,300,000 - Security Controls, Repairs Appendix F - Six Year CIP 2003 -2008 Draft 2002 Update Be Public Safety ilding 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 $100,000 - Cell, Door, and Hatch Lock Replacement Public Safety Building 0 94,000 0 0 0 0 $94,000 - Main Door and Cellblock Door lock R lacement Public Safety Building 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 $25,000 - Repair Chow Hatch and Non - electric Doors 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 $15,000 =Walls Public Safety Building 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 $20,000 - Retroft Lighting in Trustee Module 3`d Floor Public Safety Building 290,000 0 0 0 0 0 $290,000 -Re lace Roof Public Safety Building 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 $150,000 - Repair, Clean and Seal Exterior Public Safety Building 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 $350,000 - Exitin Re airs Public Safety Building 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 $100,000 -Paintin Interior Central Shop 60,500 60,500 60,500 60,500 0 0 $242,000 - Miscellaneous Maintenance Northwest Annex 0 280,000 0 0 0 0 $280,000 - Renovations roof Northwest Annex 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 $150,000 -HVACE ui ment Northwest Annex 0 60,000 0 0 0 0 $60,000 - Drama e Northwest Annex 102,000 102,000 102,000 102,000 102,000 0 $510,000 - Miscellaneous Maintenance Courthouse 406,250 406,250 406,250 406,250 0 0 $1,625,000 - Miscellaneous Maintenance Courthouse 0 550,000 0 0 0 0 $550,000 - Window & Carpet Replacement Totals 3,470,750 7,055,750 12,986,750 2,916,750 274,500 92,500 $26,797,000 See the Six -Year Comprehensive Road Program for Road costs Note. The preceding page and this page are entirely new, but underlines have been omitted for clarity. F -32 Appendix F — Six Year CIP 2001 -2006 Draft 2002 Update F�tmvl-m� MR F -33 Elm a am as am fag! im�t Me Sit Me mt me ® ® its �me - n is ®M =® ®MMM Filter 0Me Me me �w 9 a a a MM m® w mama F -33 r» F ! �&� _\ �y - »)) ( § \ ■\ .. 7 a «� � J � \ � \ ■ 1/ ,a . ƒI �- /`; � �� \\ �` }m � \ ; §§ \ R §§ ;/ _ \ _) ƒ\\ � y p \ # � av \� � § � �� <^ SeM 3 s r' A a ide ridi ? I F ` F t p1 � Hanle an Rd. id z ey n q Pe }z g3 d 3 r a ^ >ea� r9SQ � 2 inn \1^, 3 m z 4 tl + � o 40 � T'a ee e ° w e 3h o n n A G n = 3 oMayoN Q 3 z 9 PL ide ridi 1 Ut .` � 2 f ' 1 m Han a an Rd. ^z t 3 a !8 $3 a8 Ry {� r a ,tie 9Su 2 CT$ wm 10 oO <c Z- MO c� a c y m ¢ pl•, �liS� �, 9� uzio on ,�H mx 8 n� S� czi n n d a 32 fj in= D O r °tee d i N o o ff x m N °e 3" o C7 g n $' m z C _ .0 3 oN Qa 3 z m a ide ridi rijirle bdad . } ; .... a L. m t a m Han a an Rd. a, z 3 ag� d�z d a {P9 6i a'f dp a6 �pge 9 �Q1 lei �.........., i ... a aMrMie »o��p�� S? D s kP lygpo m � no i$ oo x b S o ?5iE m 2 2 m2 �Z O N C Z w% Q Z p T o S m 7 � c � 3 � F — UyoN v o as e 3 l n ide ridi i f t 7 F •V °i Han a ian Rd. r m d n {P9 ti �d a€ a e 9 OIZ aCr W 8 s 0 . —.- }s z° ? %r no nn a d of 2 a o g ;° oo� ^s 3 n gj y >M e n d O m D me y %. @ m m V O �� o C v' a� Q N 3 g i FL FL ide `t r i d ii t vt F tt p1 Han a an Rd. €� m a `Z Syy� s [ n 9P Pg 4. vP ErPr cp 0.j i i 3 a oti SF2 a m C 9 9�oo m no x m m G zh O� i � " s � olei�i, z x$ P ?OO m n7 n a rae 3 m 3 n n E y m y to m mz C ODD O N m @$gi fa<l mm; m n b C C O ? O C Om 0 ! � « 10 ` \ \ _ e ` Gu cle mral - � Han ,Lean m 3 - [! }� | ... .. .... % ~ � 93 ` IF3 `6; � S `; ! )� �r ! !! :: _ a S ¥� _ ! �� ; j r� . 3 OMU�TOI� a 3 5 a •. ide ridi ru de Mad . 7 m m Hen a ian Rd. r d m 3 a �3 sa az A� r 0'e `SR 2 N i Of _ d O fqES - O C � y , ( \ \} a .» P� 0 ^ \2� . ®. _ »; ] \ � 9\ S � .\ \ �� `. (\\\ �/ \ EXHIBIT B 5/9/02 Planning Commission Approved Proposal Amend Chapter 4 (Capital Facilities) of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan as follows: Policy 4G -1: Adopt the following level of service standards for transportation facilities ' • A volume -to- capacity ratio of 0.75 (LOS of C- minus) during p.m. peak hours for county arterials and collectors located outside of City UGAs. • A volume -to- capacity ratio that offers a reasonable transition for roads located within City UGAs. • A volume-to-capacity ration of 0.8 (LOS of D) for arterials and collectors within County Unincorporated UGAs. • The state has adopted an "index value" of 6 (equivalent to LOS C) for highways of state -wide significance in rural areas. An LOS of C has been established for other rural state routes in Whatcom County. • The state has adopted an "index value" of 10 (equivalent to LOS D) for highways of state -wide significance in urban areas An LOS of D has been adopted for other urban state routes in Whatcom County. • A level of service for roads located within city urban growth areas consistent with those set by the city. • A level of service for arterials and collectors that is adequate to accommodate efficient transit service. • 513 ferry passenger trips annually per capita Lummi Island population. EXHIBIT C 5/9/02 Planning Commission Approved Proposal Amend Chapter 6 (Transportation chapter) of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan as follows: Policy 6A -5: The state has established an "index value" of 6 (equivalent to LOS C1 for hiehways of state -wide significance in rural areas. Establish level of service "C" for other rural state routes in Whatcom County. The state has established an "index value" of 10 (equivalent to LOS Dl for hiehways of state -wide significance in urban areas. Establish level of service °D" for other urban state routes in Whatcom County.