Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
res2004-040
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL NO. 2004 -209 CLEARANCES Initial Date Date Received In Council 0 ice A ends Date Assigneedtar Elizabeth K. Olsen OC, 4130104 /^� I pQ n,, � lG f \�/ lr `. MAY 1 1 2004 WHATCOM COUN COUNCIL 5118104 H &. D_/ Council Division Head: SlviaGoodnaa O Dept. Head: Hal H. Hart. Director PAS S . Prosecutor Karen Frakes 5 PurchminriKadget: .511 Executive: Peter Kremen / 5 q SUBJECT' A Resolution adopting recommendations for Open Space/Open Space and Open Space Timber Applications. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution Agency Report with attached Staff Report, ratings sheets and maps Excer is rom Drat Plannin Commission Minutes, March 11, 2004 and April 22, 2004 SEPA review required? ( ) Yes ( X ) NO SEPA review completed? ( ) Yes (N /A ) NO Should Clerk schedule a hearing ? ( ) Yes ( X) NO Requested Date: SUMMARYSTATEMENT: Of the thirteen OPEN SPACE applications received, staff recommends approval for one Open Space/Open Space application, approval for ten applications for Open Space Timber and denial for two applications for Open Space Timber. Distribution Indicate those who should receive action List specific names to the . Request a copy after Council right ADS Facilities Management ADS Finance ADS Hama„ Rewurces ADS into Services Assessor Jean Eastman Auditor Cooperative Extension District Court Executive Health Hearing Examiner hul COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 2004 -209 511812004: Approved 5 -0, Nelson, McShane absent, Res. 42004 -040 Related County Contract #: Juvenile Parks Planning Elizabeth K Olsen Prosecutor Public Works Sheriff Srwerm eoart neasarer Other �1Related File Numbers: OS /OS and OST 2004 -1 and 2 Ordinance or Resolution (this item): �- Num 1 er 0,40 OST 2004 -1 and 2 Res. Page 1 INTRODUCED BY: PROPOSED BY. Plannino/Dev. Services DATE. April 29, 2004 RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -040 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE AND OPEN SPACEITIMBER WHEREAS, The Planning Commission received thirteen (13) applications for Open Space Current Use Tax assessment for review and recommendations pursuant to RCW 84.34; and WHEREAS, pursuant to WAC Section 197- 11- 800(6)(c), matters relating to Open Space taxation are determined not to be major actions and are exemptfrom threshold determination and environmental impact statement requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70.390, legal notice was published in the Bellingham Herald on February 26, 2004, and April 8, 2004, and a copy of said notice was sent in a timely manner to all applicants; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 2004, and April 22, 2004, the Planning Commission opened the public hearings on the applications and received testimony from the Planning Division staff regarding the proposed Open Space /Open Space and Open Space Timber applications; and WHEREAS, Open Space /Open Space evaluations are based on the Public Benefit Rating System and Open Space Timber is evaluated upon conformance with RCW 84.34.041; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Open Space /Open Space application of Robert and Maryann Samms; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Open Space(rimber applications for Don and Splendora Huizenga, the Levorsen Family Tracts, David Grossman, Dick and Janet Gilda, and updated Open Space Timbedrimber Management Plans for the Oglesby Tracts, Bill and Merrilee Dodds, Steve Schulz, Richmond JPJ (TL #1), Timberline Logging Properties (TL #2) and Eric and Vanessa Nielsen; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends denial of the Open Space Timber applications for Keith Johnson (submitted with the Levorsen Family Tracts) and J.C. Walker and Laura Clark; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission hasforwarded its recommendation to the Whatcom County Council; and WHEREAS, Council held a public meeting on May 18, 2004, to consider the Planning Commission's recommendations, and WHEREAS, Council adopted the Planning Commission's recommendations on May 18, 2004. OST 2004 -1 and 2 Res. Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL: 1. The Whatcom County Council approves the Open Space /Open Space application for Robert and Maryann Samms; and 2. The Whatcom County Council approves the Open Space Timber applications for Don and Splendora Huizenga, the Levorsen Family Tracts, David Grossman, Dick and Janet Gilds, and updated Open Space Timber/Timber Management Plans for the Oglesby Tracts, Bill and Merrilee Dodds, Steve Schulz, Richmond JPJ (TL #1), Timberline Logging Properties (TL #2) and Eric and Vanessa Nielsen; and 3. The Whatcom County Council denies the Open Space Timber applications for Keith Johnson (submitted with the Levorsen Family Tracts) and J.C. Walker and Laura Clark; and 4. The Whatcom County Council directs the Assessor to place the parcels in the appropriate Open Space status category. 5. Adjudication of invalidity of any of the sections, clauses or provisions of this Resolution shall not affect or impair the validity of the Resolution as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. PASSED this 18 day of May , 2004. WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL WHATCOM COUNTY, WASHINGTON Appr ad as to form: aren Frakes Civil Deputy Prosecutor 6" .sdL� Laurie Caskey - Schreiber Council Vice Chair AGENCY REPORT April 28, 2004 File Ref..OST 2004 -1 and 2 Page 1 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENCY REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION IN THE ) FINDINGS, MATTER OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE YEAR ) REASONS 2004 OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE AND OPEN SPACE ) AND MOTIONS TIMBER APPLICATIONS WHEREAS, the Whatcom County Planning Commission received thirteen (13) OPEN SPACE applications; and WHEREAS, of the thirteen applications, twelve are Open Space Timber applications, of which three are new OPEN SPACE TIMBER applications, five (5) transfer applications to OPEN SPACE TIMBER from Designated Forestry, two new Timber Management Plans for previous OPEN SPACE TIMBER properties, now segregated, and two are updated Timber Management Plans for new ownership of OST properties. With change of ownership a Timber Management Plan has been submitted for review and recommendations pursuant to RCW 84.34; and WHEREAS, there is one OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE application; and WHEREAS, pursuant to WAC section 197- 11- 800(6)(c), matters relating to Open Space taxation are determined not to be major actions and are exempt from the threshold determination and environmental impact requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70.390, legal notice was published in the Bellingham Herald on Thursday, February 26, 2004, and Thursday, April 8, 2004, and a copy of said notice was sent in a timely manner to all applicants; and WHEREAS, on Thursday, March 11, 2004 and Thursday, April 22, 2004, the Planning Commission opened the public hearings on the applications and received testimony from the Planning Division staff regarding the proposed Open Space /Open Space and Open Space Timber parcels; and WHEREAS, Open Space /Open Space evaluations are based on the Public Benefit Rating System and Open Space Timber is evaluated upon conformance with RCW 84.34.041; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission concurs with the Planning Department's recommendation ofapprovalforOpenSpace /Open Space for Robert and Maryann Samms; and AGENCYREPORT April 28, 2004 File Ref'OST 2004 —1 and 2 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission concurs with the Planning Division's recommendation of approval of Open Space Timber for Don and Splendora Huizenga, the Levorsen Family Tracts, David Grossman, Dick and Janet Gilds; and updated Timber Management Plans for the Oglesby Tracts, Bill and Merrilee Dodd, Steve Schulz, Richmond JPJ (TL #1), Timberline Logging Property (TL #2) and Eric and Vanessa Nielsen; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission concurs with the Planning Division's recommendation of denial for Open Space Timber application for Keith Johnson (submitted with the Levorsen Family Tracts) and J.C. Walker and Laura Clark; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has concluded its hearings on the current applications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: FINDINGS OF FACT AND REASONS FOR ACTION 1. A quorum of Commission members was present during the hearings. 2. The statutory requirement was met regarding legal notice. 3. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval for Open Space/Timberfor Don and Splendors Huizenga, the Levorsen Family Tracts, David Grossman, Dick and Janet Gilds; and updated Timber Management Plans forthe Oglesby Tracts, Bill and Merrilee Dodd, Steve Schulz, Richmond JPJ (TL #1), Timberline Logging Property (TL #2) and Eric and Vanessa Nielsen. 4. The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial to Open Space Timber applications for Keith Johnson (submitted with the Levorsen Family Tracts) and J.C. Walker and Laura Clark. 5. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval to Open Space /Open Space application for Robert and Maryann Samms. WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION David Pros, Chairperson Hal H. Hart, A.I.C.P., Secretary Date: AGENCYREPORT April 28, 2004 File RB('OST 2004 —1 and 2 Page 3 Commissioners present at March 11, 2004 Public Hearing: Dave Pros, Bob Wiesen, John Steensma, Ron Roosma, Ken Mann, David Hunter and Rebel Burdge. Absent: John Belisle, Geoff Menzies. Commissioners present at April 22 2004 Public Hearing: Dave Pros, Ken Mann, John Belisle, Ron Roosma, Geoff Menzies, and Bob Wiesen. Absent: David Hunter, John Steensma and Rebel Burdge. Attachment: Staff Report for March 11, 2004 W.C. Planning Commission Minutes for March 11, 2004 Staff Report for April 22, 2004 W.C. Planning Commission Minutes for April 22, 2004 Prepared by: Elizabeth K. Olsen, Planner II RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting March 11 2004 Call To Order: The meeting was called to order by W hatcom County Planning Commission Chairperson, Dave Pros, in the Planning Department Library at 3:10 p.m. Roll Call: Bob Wiesen, John Steensma, Ron Roosma, Rabel Budge, and Dave Pros. Staff Present: Hal Hart, Elizabeth Olsen, and Becky Garvey. The audiotapes did not fully record. Following is a summary. Director's Dialog Hart: This week we have been looking at new subdivisions in the Birch Bay area. We have multiple subdivisions occurring with a total of about 280 houses. There will be a regional park and a store on one of the corners. Some of the issues we will be examining are the roads, trails, shoreline access, the design principals, and stormwater standards. One of the reasons people want to develop in this area is because there are no mitigation fees. There are 40 more condominium units going in at Birch Bay. There will be shoreline, design, and height issues with that. Mann in attendance at 3:15 p.m. Open Session for Public Comment Jack Petree, Bellingham: Spoke of growth issues in various parts of the Country. Los Angeles is growing slower than the rest of the Country while Las Vegas grew by 83% in the 1990's, Boise grew by 40% and Boulder grew by 18 %. The U.S. is growing at an average rate of 112 %. Hunter in attendance at 3:45 p.m. Public Hearing Open Space Timber Applications: Elizabeth Olsen presented the staff report . Don and Splendora Huizenga — This was a previous application that was put on hold for a better timber management plan. Part of the land is used for pasture. The west portion will be in open space. They received a score of 8 points. We recommend approval. Roosma moved to approve the application. Wiesen seconded. Motion carried. Dick and Janet Gilda — This is a transfer from designated forest to open space timber. They have an excellent Timber Management Plan. They received a score of 14 points. We recommend approval. Roosma moved to approve the application. Wiesen seconded. Motion carried. Open Space /Open Space Application: Bob and Maryann Samms — This is a transfer from Open Space Agriculture. There will be public access to the property. It is the vision of the applicant to use this property for school children to learn about RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting March 11 2004 nature. They will have a booklet identifying the trees, plants and animals on the property. There will be trails for the children. They received a score of 78.76. We recommend approval. Wiesen: Is West 17ih Avenue a public or private road? Olsen: Private. There would be a sign in front identifying the property as open space. Steensma: Can the current septic system accommodate this? Maryann Samms: There is a double tank they can switch between. Steensma: Does the Health Department approve of this? Samms: I don't know. The hearing was opened to the public. Bob and Maryann Samms, 6625 W. 17" Avenue, Ferndale: We are both teachers. We want children to come to the property to learn about nature. Burdge: Do you plan to expand the property? Samms: No. Burdge: Have you approached any of the schools about this? Samms: No. Wiesen: Could you do this project even if we don't approve this application? Olsen: They could but they would like it to be official. Steensma: Why was this in Open Space Agriculture? Olsen: It was put in in the 1970's, I don't know why. Steensma: What happens if they sell this property? Olsen: They would have to pay back taxes or apply to keep it in. As part of this being in open space they will have to have a sign posted, have public access and rules. Burdge moved to accept the application. Mann seconded. Motion carried. Open Space Timber Applications: Steve Schulz — This is a new plan because of a segregation that was done. This is a fully stocked stand of trees. David Anderson did the Timber Management Plan, which is excellent. They received a score of 14 points. We recommend approval. Wiesen moved to accept the application. Roosma seconded. Motion carried. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting March 11, 2004 Keith and Christine Johnson —This application does not have enough acreage to apply. We recommend denial. Wiesen moved to deny the application. Roosma seconded. Motion carried. Pros: Why do we have to look at the open space applications? Olsen: Because they are Comprehensive Plan amendments. Work Session Adoption of the Lummi Island Findings and Conclusions for the Lummi Island Subarea Plan Olsen reviewed the findings and conclusions for the Lummi Island Subarea Plan which the Planning Commission adopted on February 26, 2004. Wiesen moved to strike the first sentence of finding #11. Steensma seconded. Motion failed. Roosma moved to reword conclusion #2 to read: The lot consolidation dens ty4eda tion and aquifer recharge protection programs included in the revised Lummi Island Plan ... Steensma seconded. Motion carried. Burdge moved to accept the findings as amended. Roosma seconded. Roll call vote: Ayes — Burdge, Mann, Roosma, Steensma, Wiesen; Nays — Hunter, Pros; Abstain — 0; Absent — Belisle, Menzies. Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m. for dinner recess. The meeting was reconvened and called to order, by Chairperson Dave Pros, at 6:40 p.m. in the Planning Department Library. Roll Call: John Belisle, Rabel Burdge, Ken Mann, Dave Pros, Ron Roosma, John Steensma, and Bob Wiesen. Staff present: Hal Hart, Amy Pederson, Jeff Chalfant, and Becky Garvey. Open Session for Public Comment There was no public comment. Approval of the minutes of the February 12 and February 26, 2004 meetings. Wiesen moved to accept the minutes as written. Burdge seconded. Motion carried. Hunter in attendance at 6:45 p.m. Public Hearing File # ZON2003 -00002 - Roy: To consider amending the official W hatcom County zoning map from Point Roberts Transitional Zone (TZ) to Residential Rural - 1 dwelling unit per acre (RR1) for approximately eight (8) acres in the Point Roberts Subarea, located south of Province Road. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting March 11 2004 Amy Pederson presented the staff report. The request is to rezone approximately 8.15 acres, off of Province Road, from Pt. Roberts Transitional zoning to Residential Rural /one house per acre. In September 2000 the Planning Staff, the Pt. Roberts Steering Committee and consultants began working with the Pt. Roberts community to re- evaluate the 1990 Pt. Roberts Subarea Plan as well as the zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps. When the Pt. Roberts Steering Committee made their recommendation for the draft map they were looking at what was to become the Pt. Roberts Transitional Zone District. It would either be one house per five acres, with no sewer available, or would be one house per acre if you provided a cluster subdivision, with a permanent open space reserve tract and provided on -site sewer or a community wastewater facility. At the public hearing held at Pt. Roberts Mr. Roy testified that he would like to keep his current zoning which was four houses per acre if there was sewer. His property was proposed to be rezoned to RR1. Later, at a follow -up work session the Planning Commission considered a third density option under the transitional zoning. When the Planning Commission considered a third density option it was recommended people be able to keep their higher density zoning and Mr. Roy's property was recommended TZ. When it got to the Planning and Development Committee at County Council that third density option was removed. Therefore the property remained in Transitional zoning, with a maximum density of 1 unit per acre. It is the only property zoned this in the area and is surrounded by RR1. Staff recommends changing the zoning back to RR1. Mann: Is there public sewer there now? Pederson: No. Wiesen: Is there a water system? Pederson: Yes, there is public water. The hearing was opened to the public. Diana Leach( ?): Does this property fall under the hobby farm category and get a tax break? Pederson: No. Leach: Did they purchase the whole eight acres individually or as a parcel? Pederson: I would have to defer that question to the owner. Leach: Are they looking to divide this property into separate lots? Pederson: It's two separate parcels. Leach: Are they looking at the potential of one house or multi- housing? Pederson: I don't know. Leach: Most of the homes in that area are on less than one half acre. The concern for us is this is going to become a subdivision. The site has been leveled. At one point there was discussion of a skate park going in there. Pederson: The skate park has been proposed, but not on this property. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting March 11 2004 Wiesen: Are most of the properties around this already developed? John Roy, 1851 Province Rd. Pt. Roberts: 1 think the average density is .28 acres. There are about 28 lots surrounding the property and about 18 to 20 houses. Mann: What is the advantage to you to do a rezone? Roy: I'm probably going to sell the property so it wouldn't be as restrictive. Wiesen: How long have you owned the property? Roy: Since 1993. Pros: Did you talk to the County Council when this was happening? Roy: Yes. Pros: Do you think it was an oversight? Roy: I don't know. Pederson: I don't think Council was aware of this issue when they deleted the third TZ option. Janice Campbell, 1904 Province Rd., Pt. Roberts: The outcome of this application will result eight one acre lots on this property. Wiesen: Is that a problem to you? Campbell: We don't know yet. Leach: If you knew the area, which is basically wooded lots, the eight acre parcel has been leveled. This has changed the appearance of the neighborhood. Sleensma: What would you like us to do with this? Don't you think it would be better with one acre houses? Leach: I don't know. Burdge: How long ago was it leveled? Leach: Some time ago The Public Hearing was closed. Work Session Hunter: Mr. Roy, when were the trees leveled? Roy: Some in 1999, 2000, and 1997. Hunter: Why? RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION March 11. 2004 Roy: I wanted to convert the property to pasture and I intended to divide it. I had a DNR permit to remove the trees. Wiesen moved to accept the staff report recommendation of approval. Roosma seconded. Roll call vote: Ayes - Burdge, Hunter, Pros, Roosma, Steensma, Wiesen; Nays - Belisle, Mann; Abstain - 0; Absent - Menzies. Motion carried. The Washington State Department of Ecology gave a power point presentation titled Introduction to The Landscape Approach, Maintaining Wetland/Aquatic Ecosystems by Understanding Water Flow Processes. The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m Minutes prepared by B. Garvey. WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Dave Pros, Chair Hal H. Hart, A.I.C.P., Secretary RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting April 22 2004 Call To Order: The meeting was called to order by Whatcom County Planning Commission Chairperson, Dave Pros, in the Planning Department Library at 6:40 p.m. Roll Call: Dave Pros, Ken Mann, John Belisle, Ron Roosma, Geoff Menzies, and Bob Wiesen. Staff Present: Sylvia Goodwin, Elizabeth Olsen, Jeff Chalfant, Sue Blake -Water Resources, John Thompson -Water Resources, and Becky Garvey. Open Session for Public Comment There was no public comment. David Hunter in attendance at 6:45 p.m. Public Hearings Open Space Timber Applications Elizabeth Olsen presented the staff report. Timberline Logging Inc - 400618 — 397337 (2 oarcels) 40 +/- acres transfer from Designated Forestry , 8700 block Silver Lake Road. Olsen: One of the parcels has been clearcut in the last year but has been replanted. The other parcel is a buffer along the creek. Wiesen: Is this changing ownership? Olsen: Yes. Belisle: Do we know what the change in taxes would be? Olsen: No. The hearing was opened to the public. There was no public testimony. Work Session Wiesen moved to accept the staff report recommendation of approval. Menzies seconded. Motion carried. David Grossman — 400507- 549355 and 08 - 012327 029353 058361 15 +/- acres transfer from Designated Forestry 5300 Reece Hill Road The hearing was opened to the public. There was no public testimony. Work Session RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting April 22 2004 Wiesen moved to accept the staff report recommendation of approval. Menzies seconded. Motion carried. J.C. Walker & Laura Clark — 380509 - 030460 Olsen: The goal is to conserve this land. There is no plan for harvesting, thinning, or replanting. The parties are going to apply for a different type of designation. The recommendation for this application is denial. The hearing was opened to the public. There was no public testimony. Work Session Wiesen moved to accept the staff report recommendation of denial. Menzies seconded. Motion carried. Eric and Vanessa Nielsen — 380418 - 204150 segregated new TMP 8.67 acres 3900 bilk. Sgualicum Lake Road. Olsen: This is an updated timber management plan because of a segregation of the property. The hearing was opened to the public. There was no public testimony. Work Session Wiesen moved to accept the staff report recommendation of approval. Menzies seconded. Motion carried. Bill and Merrilee Dodd 400121 — 069417 - 069450 segregated new Timber Management Plan 20 +/- acres 4100 block Holtzheimer Tr. Rd. Olsen: This is also an updated timber management plan. There is a new owner. The hearing was opened to the public. There was no public testimony. Work Session Menzies moved to accept the staff report recommendation of approval. Wiesen seconded. Motion carried. Levorsen Family Tracts — 390125 36 +/- acres 2700 bilk. Douglas Road Olsen: There are three separate parcels. Wiesen: These are neighbors and I received a campaign contribution from them. I feel I can be fair in this. Does anyone have a concern? RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting April 22 2004 The other commissioners had no concerns with this. Roosma: Is there a section that needs replanting? Olsen: Yes. They will come back with an application for this in the future. The hearing was opened to the public. Wiesen: Is the pasture land in open space agriculture? Loren Levorsen: Yes. Anything not in timber is being farmed. I hope this land stays in the family for many years. The hearing was closed to the public Work Session Menzies moved to accept the staff report recommendation of approval. Belisle seconded. Motion carried. Oglesby Family Tracts tAmv Burk Carver) - 400205 — 168040,-098090, 38 +/- acres upgraded Timber Management Plan 2000 Burk Road. Olsen: This is an updated timber management plan. The hearing was opened to the public. There was no public testimony. Work Session Menzies moved to accept the staff report recommendation of approval. Wiesen seconded. Motion carried. Planning Commission training John Thompson, Whalcom County Water Resources, gave a power point presentation on the Endangered Species Act and The W RIA 1 Salmonid Recovery Plan. Sue Blake, Whatcom County Water Resources, gave a power point presentation on the WRIA 1 Watershed Management Project. Other Business Mann: At the last meeting we put the Recreation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan on hold. Will that appear on the agenda when it's ready to come back to us? Goodwin: Yes. Menzies: I distributed to you a copy of the Puget Sound Action Team GMA Update Recommendations to Local Governments in Puget Sound. There is a lot of good stuff in here. Make sure you read it. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting April 22 2004 Menzies: Is there a reason why there is no EIS process for the Birch Bay Plan? Goodwin: The Birch Bay process has been going on for four years. When the plan was all done it wasn't determined to be significantly different than what was there already. The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Minutes prepared by B. Garvey. WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Dave Pros, Chair Hal H. Hart, A.I.C.P., Secretary Staff Report File OS 2004 March 4, 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT OPEN SPACE APPLICATIONS 2004 — Don and Splendora Huizenga Open Space Timber 2004 — Keith and Christine Johnson Open Space Timber 2004 — Richard Jr. and Janet Gilda Open Space Timber (Transfer from Desig. Forest) 2004 — Steve Schulz Open Space Timber— Continuance of OST with new Timber Management Plan (segregation and sale) 2004 — Robert and Maryann Samms — Open Space /Open Space (Transfer from Open Space Agriculture). This report summarizes the Planning and Development Department's recommendations on Open Space applications received in 2003 and early 2004. The Open Space Taxation Act (RCW 54.34) was enacted in 1970 for two primary reasons: to create a tax climate that was equitable to the open space landowner and to decrease the rate which open space lands were being converted to non -rural uses. These were accomplished by providing property tax relief to land that qualifies under one of the following open space classifications: OPEN SPACE AGRICULTURE, OPEN SPACE FARM AND AGRICULTURE CONSERVATION, OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE and OPEN SPACE TIMBER. The agricultural designation is administered by the County Assessor whilst the Open Space, Timber, and Farm and Agriculture Conservation applications fall under the authority of the County Council. The process is handled in the same manner as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The Council decides on whether to grant the applicant assessment at current use after receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Open Space Timber is no longer subject to Planning Commission review under the Public Benefit Rating System. Of the five applications received, there are two OPEN SPACE TIMBER applications and one transfer application to OPEN SPACE TIMBER from Designated Forest, and one new Timber Management Plan for a previous OPEN SPACE TIMBER property, now segregated. With change of ownership a Timber Management Plan has been submitted. Also, one OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE application has been received for a transfer from the Open Space agriculture designation. The recommendations are based on the information gathered with the adopted Whatcom County Public Benefit Rating System and Timber Management Plan criteria. Staff evaluatuions and recommendations with maps and aerials showing location of each individual application are attached. Also attached is a locational map and Exhibit 1 that describes the Whatcom County Open Space Policy Procedure and Criteria and Public Benefit Rating System. Staff Report REQUIREMENTS File OS 2004 March 4, 2004 For the OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE and OPEN SPACE FARM AND AGRICULTURE CONSERVATION categories, approval is contingent upon three matters (unless the subject property is subject to the Critical Areas Ordinance): (1) The applicant consents to a degree of public access to the site, to be specified in the formal signed agreement. Such access is to be commensurate with site characteristics and generally subject to users obtaining the owners permission. (2) The applicant posts a sign indicating open space status and public access. (3) The applicant signs and returns a "Hold Harmless Agreement" together with the signed formal agreement. For the OPEN SPACE TIMBER category, approval is contingent upon conformance with RCW 84.34.041. This places an emphasis on approval or denial according to the completeness of the Timber Management Plan. The Timber management Plans are rated by staff on how complete they are in seven (7) categories and may receive up to 2 points for each category. Approval is recommended for those properties receiving a score of 7 or more and denial is recommended for those properties receiving a score of less than 7. If a property receives a score of less than 7 points, the property owner has an option to update their Timber Management Plan. All Timber Management Plans must be approved or denied within 6 months of their receipt. RECOMMENDATION For the OPEN SPACE TIMBER applications received, staff recommends the following: 1) Approval of the applications: Huizenga, Gilda and Schulz. 2) Denial of the application: Johnson. For the OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE application received, staff recommends the following: 3) Approval of the application: Samms ATTACHMENTS Overall Location Map Ratings for all applications with maps and aerials. Exhibit 1, Whatcom County Open Space Policy and Criteria and Public Benefit Rating System. EXHIBIT 1 Whatcom County Open Space Policy and Criteria and Public Benefit Rating System 1995 SUMMARY OF WHATCOM COUNTY OPEN SPACE POLICIES Publir Renert RntingSystern; All applications for open space -open space and open space- farm and agriculture conservation will be rated according to the Whatcom County Public Benefit Rating System described in the following pages. A Public Benefit Rating of at least 45 must be attained in order to be recommended for approval. In addition, the amount of tax reduction to be granted to open space applications will he based on the Public Benefit Rating. The greater the public benefit provided by keeping the property in open space use, the greater the tax reduction. II. Pulille arress- As a condition of approval, owners of open space parcels must agree to provide a certain degree of public access according to the Whatcom County Public Access Policy listed on Page 12. All applications shall be accompanied by the owner's proposed rules of conduct and a description of how public access is to be managed, within the limitations outlined in the Whatcom County Public Access Policy. Note: On parcels where there is a documented occurrence of a State or Federal Endangered or Threatened species; Federal Proposed Endangered or Threatened Species; and State Sensitive or Monitor Species; or where there is a known or potentially significant archaeological site; or when the purpose of the open space is for wetland conservation, the public access requirement may be waived by the Council. III. Open Spn re Sign* As a condition of approval, owners of open space parcels must agree to post a sign in a location visible to passing motorists, in accordance with the Whatcom County Open Space Sign Policy on Page 13 indicating the parcel's open space status and the availability of public access. As with the public access requirement, the requirement for posting of a sign may be waived in some instances. IV. Hold Harmlesc Aereement• All open space property owners must sign a hold harmless agreement, freeing Whatoom County of any liability which may arise as a result of open space approval. A copy of the hold harmless agreement is included on Page 14. I. APPROVAL CRITERIA: OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE AND OPEN SPACE/FARM & AGRICULTURE CONSERVATION Washington State law specifies that: In determining whether an application made for open space current use taxation status should be approved or disapproved, pursuant to RCW 84.34.020, subsection (1)(b) (open Space/Open Space) or subsection (c) (Open Space/Farm & Agriculture Conservation), - the Whatcom County Planning Commission will consider in its recommendations to the County Council whether or not preservation of the current use of the land, when balanced against the resulting revenue loss or tax shift from granting the application will: 1. Conserve or enhance natural, cultural or scenic resources, or 2. Protect streams, stream corridors, wetlands, natural shorelines and aquifers, or 3. Protect soil resources and unique or critical wildlife and native plant habitat, or 4. Promote conservation principles by example or by offering educational opportunities, or 5. Enhance the value of abutting or neighboring parks, forests, wildlife preserves, nature reservations or sanctuaries or other open spaces, or 6. Enhance recreation opportunities, or 7. Preserve historic and archaeological sites, or 8. Affect any other factors relevant in weighing benefits to the general welfare of preserving the current use of the property. U. PUBLIC BENEFIT RATING SYSTEM A. Based on the first seven (7) approval criteria listed above in conjunction with number eight (8) above, the Planning Department staff will assign each application for Open Space/ Open Spamm and Open Spare /Farts w Agriculture Conwrvatinn a PUBLIC BENEFIT RATING using the method described below. B. A parcel must receive a PUBLIC BENEFIT RATING of at least forty five (45) to be recommended for approval. C. The PUBLIC BENEFIT RATING will be used by the County Assessor's office in determining the amount of tax reduction for OpenSpacelOpen Space and Open Spare /Farm R Agriculture Conservation parcels. III. PUBLIC BENEFIT RATING CALCULATION A. BASIC VALUE The Planning and Development Services Department will review each Open SpareXOpen Snare and Open Spare/Farm & Agriculture C-nnservation application and will assign to each a BASIC VALUE that represents the degree of conformance with the BASIC VALUE CRITERIA listed in Section IV below. B. PUBLIC BENEFIT VALUE The BASIC VALUE will be increased (or decreased) by a percentage (PUBLIC BENEFIT VALUE) representing the benefit to the general welfare of preserving the current use of the property, based on conformance with the factors listed in section V below. C. PUBLIC BENEFPf RATING FORMULA The PUBLIC RFNFFIT R ATINf will be calculated using the following formula: PBR= BV +(BV X PBV), where: •B uylt I. It I I'. 1 taUa 1 i I IV. BASIC VALUE CRITERIA: A. Open Spare /Open Space A maximum of ten points for open snaretapen-space applications may be assigned far each of the 7 items based upon conformance with the criteria listed below. 1. Conserve or entrance natural, cultural or scenic resources. Criteria fnr approval: a. lands which possess unique scenic vistas available to the public or are within the visual corridor of scenic roads or highways; b. lands which, when left in their natural state, would serve as buffers between areas of commercial or industrial activity and areas of human habitations; C. lands which can serve to prevent the spread of high density residential development into less developed areas; d. lands located adjacent to airports. 2. Protect streams, stream corridors, wetlands, natural shorelines and aquifers. Criteria for approval- a. rn oval, a. lands within a 100 -year floodplain; b. lands within or adjacent to areas of domestic water supply; C. lands near or adjacent to streams or rivers where, if alterations were to occur, a resulting loss of quality would also occur in the conditions of water and the general functioning of the regime; d. lands which provide for preservation of bogs or swamps; C. lands adjacent to bodies of water, both marine and fresh; L lands including and adjacent to wetlands and tidal areas (these lands would not necessarily be approved contingent upon public access agreement due to biological sensitivities). 3. Protect soil resources and unique or critical wildlife and native plant habitat. Criteria for npprnval: a. lands where slopes exceed 25% or areas where underlying geology and soils are known to produce unstable conditions; b. lands where, if alterations were to occur, a resulting high risk of soil erosion would follow; C. lands which represent habitats for unique or critical wildlife or native plants, or where there is a documented occurrence of a State or Federal Endangered Species; State or Federal Threatened Species; Federal Proposed Endangered or Threatened Species; or State Sensitive or Monitor Species as listed in the Washington Department of Wildlife Nongame Data System. On parcels where there this documentation, the Department shall automatically recommend approval with a recommendation that a sign and public access shall not be required. 4. Promote conservation principles by example or by offering educational opportunities. a. lands which are an example of application of conservation principles; b. lands which offer opportunities for conservation education such as interpretive centers or trails. Enhance the value to the public of abutting or neighboring parks, forests, wildlife preserves, nature reservations or sanctuaries or other open spaces; Criteria for approval- a. land that the local County Park Board has identified for possible future park acquisition; b. land designated in County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Study and other documents as significant park land, open space or conservation areas; C. lands which, as open space, may help to provide for successful imple- mentation of County Trail Plan; d. lands which are near or adjacent to existing public parks, forests, wildlife preserves, nature reservations, sanctuaries, schools or other open space lands classified under RCW 84.33 or RCW 84.34; 6. Enhance recreation opportunities. criteria for approval- a. lands possessing private recreational facilities which are available to the public without charge; b. lands which provide opportunities for passive recreational activities such as, but not limited to, hiking, horseback riding, hunting, fishing, bird watching, and nature observation; 7. Preserve historic and archaeological sites. a. areas or sites which have been identified as significant on local, state or national Historic Registers; b. areas or sites of known or potential archaeological significance. On parcels where there is a known or potentially significant archaeological site, the Department shall automatically recommend approval with a recommendation that a sign and public access shall not be required. Only parcels consistent with RCW 84.34.020(8)(a)(b) may be considered for Open Space/Farm & Agriculture Conservation. A maximum of fifteen (15) points for apen-Sparet Farm 8z Agricuhnre Conservation applications may be assigned for each of the first fwn VJ itomc listed below, and a maximum of five e (Sj points may be assigned fnr_the mIDaininne r o_it ( items listed below based upon conformance with the criteria listed. 1. Traditional or potential farmland. Criteria for 1• lands which have historically been used for agriculture; and /or lands that have not been devoted to a use inconsistent with agricultural uses. 2. Soil Value Criteria for apprnvaL. a. lands which contain prime farmland as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture; or b. lands which contain capability classification I- IV- according to the US Department of Agriculture Land Capability Classification system. 3. Comprehensive Plan Designation Criteria fora rnvale Lands which are designated Agriculture or Incentive Agriculture in the Whalcom County Comprehensive Plan. 4. Conserve or enhance natural, cultural or scenic resources. Criferia fnr apnrnval' a. lands which possess unique scenic vistas available to the public or are within the visual corridor of scenic roads or highways; b. lands which, when left in their natural state, would serve as buffers between areas of commercial or industrial activity and areas of human habitations; C. lands which can serve to prevent the spread of high density residential development into less developed areas; d. lands located adjacent to airports. 5. Protect streams, stream corridors, wetlands, natural shorelines and aquifers. f'r't f IrP n I a. lands within a 100 -year floodplain; b. lands within or adjacent to areas of domestic water supply; C. lands near or adjacent to streams or rivers where, if alterations were to occur, a resulting loss of quality would also occur in the conditions of water and the general functioning of the regime; d. lands which provide for preservation of bogs or swamps; C. lands adjacent to bodies of water, both marine and fresh; f. lands including and adjacent to wetlands and tidal areas (these lands would not necessarily be approved contingent Upon public access agreement due to biological sensitivi- ties), 6. Protect soil resources and unique or critical wildlife and native plant habitat. Criteria for 4p t a. lands where slopes exceed 25% or areas where underlying geology and soils are known to produce unstable conditions; b. lands where, if alterations were to occur, a resulting high risk of soil erosion would follow; C. lands which represent habitats for unique or critical wildlife or native plants, or where there is a documented occurrence of a State or Federal Endangered Species; State or Federal Threatened Species; Federal Proposed Endangered or Threatened Species; or State Sensitive or Monitor Species as listed in the Washington Department of Wildlife Nongame Data System. On these parcels the Department shall automatically recommend approval with a recommendation that a sign and public access shall not be required. 7. Promote conservation principles by example or by offering educational opportunities. a. lands which are an example of application of conservation principles; b. lands which offer opportunities for conservation education such as interpretive centers or trails. Enhance the value to the public of abutting or neighboring parks, forests, agricultural lands, wildlife preserves, nature reservations or sanctuaries or other open spaces, t'riteria far apprnvaL• a. land that the local County Park Board has identified for possible future park acquisition; b. land designated in County Parks, Recreation and Open Space Studies and other documents as significant park land, open space or conservation areas; C. lands which, as open space, may help to provide for successful implementation of County Trail Plan; d. lands which are near or adjacent to existing public parks, forests, wildlife preserves, nature reservations, sanctuaries, schools or other open space lands classified under RCW 84.33 or RCW 84.34; 9. Enhance recreation opportunities. criteria for approval- a. lands possessing private recreational facilities which are available to the public without charge; b. lands which provide opportunities for passive recreational activities such as but not limited to hiking, horseback riding, hunting, fishing, bird watching, and nature observation; 10. Preserve historic and archaeological sites. cdteria far apprnvat• a. areas or sites which have been identified as significant on local, state or national Historic Registers; b. areas or sites of known or potential archaeological signifi- cance. On parcels where there is a known or potentially significant archaeological site, the Department shall automatically recommend approval with a recommendation that a sign and public access shall not be required. V. PUBLIC BENEFIT VALUE CRITERIA The. following list of open space characteristics have been determined to have a high priority in providing (or detracting from) benefit to the general welfare will be used to determine the PUBLIC BENFFTT YALUE for each Open SparelOpen Space and Open Spare/Fa R Agrierdfiuw Cnnqprvatinn application. The total PUBLIC BFNFFIT YALHE will increase (or decrease) the BASIL' VAIJIF by a certain percentage. It is possible to attain a P IBLIC BENEFIT VALOR of up to 140%, resulting in a maximum possible increase of 140%. A. PUBLIC ACCESS (Maximum 40% increase) 1. Shoreline access 2. Recreation access 1 Public road frontage 4. Availability of off - street parking 5. Quality of access in terms of accessibility and owner's Proposed rules of conduct and access management B. WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION(Maximum 20% increase) 1. Watershed of domestic water supply 2. Aquifer recharge area 3. Preservation of hydrologic processes: - streams and natural drainage courses - wetlands, swamps, bogs -lakes C. WILDLIFE HABITAT (Maximum 20% increase) 1. State or Federal Endangered Species; State or Federal Threatened Species; Federal Proposed Endangered or Threatened Species; or State Sensitive or Monitor Species. 2. Abundance and diversity of wildlife (associated with "edge" type habitat and areas of vegetative and topographic diversity). D. PARCEL SIZE 1. Twenty (20) acres or larger (Maximum In% increase) 2. Smaller than five (5) nominal acres (Maximum 10% decrease for OS Open Space applications; Required 40% decrease for OS Farm and Agriculture Conservation applications) E. LINKAGE WITH OTHER OPEN SPACES (Maximum S% 10 increase) Adjacent to other Open Space, parks, or open areas associated with Planned Unit Developments, Cluster Subdivisions, or Binding Site Plans. F. NATURAL AREAS (Maximum 59% increase) Based on how much of parcel is in natural cover and not developed with homesite, outbuildings, and clearings. G. FINANCIAL ADVANTAGE (Maximum 409% decrease) The use to which the land is put derives a financial advantage for it owners. H. DISCRETIONARY VALUE (Maximum 40°1% increase) (Minimum Oft% decrease) Discretionary value may be added or subtracted where land provides or detracts from public benefits other than those specifically listed above. If discretionary value is added or subtracted,. the provision of or detraction from public benefits shall be set forth in detail on the supplemental application form and on the scoring sheet PUBLIC ACCESS All applications for Open Space/Open Space and Open Space Farm & Agriculture Conservation shall be accompanied by the owners' proposed rules of conduct and a description of how public access is to be managed, within the limitations outlined below. The term "Public Access" is limited and defined as the right of any individual to request permission to enter and visit the premises on foot for legitimate recreational purposes such as bird watching, scenic observation, scientific investigation, picnicking during daylight hours, and strolling and general relaxation on the premises. This right is subject to the execution by the visitor of An agreement to abide by any reasonable rules of personal conduct required by the owners while on the premises, and 2. A general release of the owner from liability for any injury suffered by the visitor while on the premises. Permission will be granted without discrimination, EXCEPT in the case of a person in disorderly or apparently intoxicated condition in which case permission will be denied. Any permission previously granted shall become automatically revoked, and the visitor deemed to be a trespasser upon the premises. Owners retain and reserve the power to officially post and enforce rules not inconsistent with the foregoing provisions and conditions for public entry upon the premises. DATED this day of 2000 SIGNED: owner owner 12 OPEN SPACE SIGN POLICY As a condition of approval of your open space application, you must post a two foot (2' x 2') sign on your property to indicate open space status, public access, and the Open Space Agreement number within one month of executing the Open Space Agreement. The sign must be located on the property's road frontage in as conspicuous a location as possible. Construction of the sign will be the responsibility of the applicant and will be in accordance with the specifications on file with the Planning and Development Services Department. It is the property owner's responsibility to assure that the sign remains in place during the period of the open space agreement. This policy affects all Open Space /Open Space and Open Space /Farm and Agricultural Conservation applications. 13 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT owner ! owner In consideration for Whatcom County's approval of the attached Open Space Application, with any conditions that may be imposed, hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Whatcom County, its officers and employees from any claim that may arise against Whatcom County as a result of the approval of the attached application with conditions. This agreement shall become binding only after the attached application has been approved by the Whatcom County Council. DATED this day of 2000 SIGNED: owner owner m PUBLIC ACCESS All applications for Open Space/Open Space and Open Space Farm & Agriculture Conservation shall be accompanied by the owners' proposed rules of conduct and a description of how public access is to be managed, within the limitations outlined below. The term "Public Access" is limited and defined as the right of any individual to request permission to enter and visit the premises on foot for legitimate recreational purposes such as bird watching, scenic observation, scientific investigation, picnicking during daylight hours, and strolling and general relaxation on the premises. This right is subject to the execution by the visitor of: 1. An agreement to abide by any reasonable rules of personal conduct required by the owners while on the premises, and 2. A general release of the owner from liability for any injury suffered by the visitor while on the premises. Permission will be granted without discrimination, EXCEPT in the case of a person in disorderly or apparently intoxicated condition in which case permission will be denied. Any permission previously granted shall become automatically revoked, and the visitor deemed to be a trespasser upon the premises. Owners retain and reserve the power to officially post and enforce rules not inconsistent with the foregoing provisions and conditions for public entry upon the premises. DATED this day of 200 SIGNED: owner owner Whatcom County Council AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING OF OPEN SPACE SIGN PURSUANT TO WHATCOM COUNTY OPEN SPACE SIGN POLICY AND SPECIFICATION being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says: That I have posted a two foot by two foot Open Space Sign in accordance with the Whatcom County Open Space Sign Policy and the Whatcom County Open Space Sign Specification, in a conspicuous location, visible to passing motorists, indicating the Open Space status of the following Open Space parcel(s): Assessor's Parcel Number(s): I understand that it is the property owner's responsibility to assure that the sign(s) remains in place during the period of the Open Space Agreement; that posting of the Open Space sign is subject to verification by County personnel; and that failure to maintain the sign is a violation of the Open Space Agreement and may result in withdrawal of Open Space status with attendant taxes and penalties payable pursuant to RCW 84.34. Signature of Property Owner or other person posting property I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Signature of Notary Publi Seal My Appointment As a condition of approval of your Open Space application, you must post at least one Open Space sign on the property's road frontage in a conspicuous location, visible to passing motorists. It shall be the property - owner's responsibility to assure that the sign remains in place during the period of the Open Space Agreement. A typical sign and mounting are illustrated below. The sign shall be purchased from the Whatcom County Planning and Development Department for $S.00 plus tax of .39 cents. The sign shall be permanently attached to a weather - resistant solid backing at least two feet by two feet in size. You may also post reasonable rules of personal conduct while on the premises, pursuant to Whatcom County Public Access Policy. Such rules shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to posting. TOP OF SIGN 1 W V u u N ground level TYPICAL SIGN AND MOUNTING 2 feet ( space for posting rules ) % inch ply -2" z 22 "Jpo, y- f Huizenga OST 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Don /Splendora Huizenga Designation: Open Space Timber 5481 Dinkel Rd. Revised Timber Management Plan Bellingham, WA. 98226 Parcel No.: 390326- 225224 Subarea: Lynden /Nooksack Valley Parcel Acreage: 26.46 acres Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Acreage in DST: 12 acres Zoning Desig.: R5A Road Access: Dinkel Road Shorelines: N/A Land Use: Residential, pasture and forest Land Use History Pasture /farmland Soil Type /Capabilities: #179- Whatcom silt loam, 3 - 8% slopes - 95% lot coverage Site Index* 116 - Douglas 6r #93 - Labounty silt loam, 0 - 2% slopes - 5% lot coverage Site Index* Red Alder - 90 Limitations /Concerr Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness. Seedling mortality and establishment, competing vegetation. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0—incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 2 Douglas fir, Western red cedar, hemlock, red alder bigleaf maple, understory - sword fern, salal Soils Description 2 2 Typical woodland soil units. Forest Health - 2 No mention of forest stand health. Harvest Plan 2 2 Selective logging for woodland improvement, harvesting in 2024 for areas I and 3, 2044 for area 2. Thinning Program 2 2 Management control of red alder and selective thinning for firewood. Planting /Restocking Program 2 No mention. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 No mention. TOTAL: 8 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval 'Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. vx . . ».: >_� ° °\�« ©:« . ..,. ®�� . . . : ?22<� ». «« ».� \\ d w <� � :« ?,? \ \: , . ».. y� « .. w »��.. »�- . \\: : :yam � � � � » w� . . y ° . � y», \ \ 2 » � &�� . \ 7 . :y\ ::«y . \� .\ �� � v. y� . w. : \� /�. § y , . . » \�w. \©»� . \ \gam � .: / . /> � � �� .� :22d«�® .2. ^ �� .�. ~� � �<<y/� \<? ^ & ' \v>�� �1» �- � � \.- - 7 »� � - p� \� . . . .� . � . � � . . ., © . « � . ^ ©.�<vy,vyf = w + ? .� « d , � »� � � .� «`�� &: }�� . /�\� �� « ?d : � « » 2 y.� \ a <z � . .�d�y� . y ©.� .. w, � � y� � w� � -�� .: � ,,«p» < «... :»�»v: a� a :© � ? <��� � .� �w .� . . . . . y�� . v .> s. « » «« <:? < «� . . »� .- §» \ > >� /� §: � 6 2 � 7w. <« . � � » � 2% »� � \ a<y, ® /\ \ \��« ` � \ d : . : � ®»», a * :xa � � s� .. :. w a� , x. y , >: . . . . < . � «: . FOREST STEWARDSHIP CONSERVATION PLAN NAME: NM & MRS. DONALD L. HUIZfiNQrA ADDRESS: 5481 DINKEL ROAD BELLINGHAM, WA 98226 TELEPHONE: 360.398.1035 PROPERTY LOCATION: 26.46 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DR% KEL ROAD NORTH OF THE SMITH ROAD. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER LYING WESTERLY OF COUNTY ROAD 142 (DINI{EL ROAD), ALL IN SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 39, NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF W.M. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 500 FEET THEREOF, AND EX. CEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO WHATCOM COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1543991, AND EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD 142 (DINKEL ROAD) LYING ALONG EASTERLY LINE THEREOF. SITUATE IN COUNTY OF WHATCOM, STATE OF WASHING. TON PLAN PREPARED BY. DONALD L. HUIZENGA, PROPERTY OWNER DATE OF PLAN: NOVEMBER 1999 FORESTLAND CONSERVATION PLAN The attached conservation plan has four sections: 1) OBJECTIVES - Summary of your present and future goals. 2) INVENTORY - Basic list of the soil, plant and water resources on your property. 3) MANAGEMENT - Description of conservation treatment needs and recommendations. 4) DECISIONS - Record of your decisions as to what practices will be used and when. FORESTLAND MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES To enhance long -term timber production. This will be accomplished over time by precommercial thinning in the southern part of the stand and selective logging in the northern part of the stand. INVENTORY Area 1 and 3 -- 7 acres This area is an uneven -aged multistoried stand that is fully stocked with western redcedar, 12 -15" inches in diameter at breast height (dbh) ; bigleaf maple, 13 -20" dbh; paper birch, 10 -14" dbh; and western hemlock, 14 -17" dbh. The understory is made up of red elderberry, vine maple, salmonberry and swordfern. Area 2 -- 5 acres This area was clearcut between 1979 -1981 and planted to Douglas fir at a 12' X 12' spacing. At present, the stand is moderately stocked with Douglas fir, 4 -5 inches dbh and 17 -22 feet in height. The understory is made up of salal, oregon grape, oceanspray, huckleberry, vine maple and bigleaf maple. SOILS- LABOUNTY WHATCOM Silt These sobs can be productive for a number oftree spiecies; but are ¢est suited for the production of Douglas fir and Red cedar. Site index is used to measure the soil's abifrty to-grow trees. 11 is the heii (in feet) that tfie fastest growing trees can be expected to reach at 50 years of age. The soil has a Douglas Fir she index of-about 11-6 (ID6 feet ofheight at 501 years of age) Rutad ons of Douglas Fir average about 60 years. The Primary forest management concerns op- these -sm7s are seedjing mortality and a high potential that competmgvegetation will invade young treoptantations. Soil moisture- content during the growing season helps plant surival. Competing vegation should be controlled by chemical or mechanical uses during growing - managetpent. The soils are not easily compacted and unsurfso9droads are soft when wet. Soils are subelect to rutting during rainy periods and would require suitable sur&ctng for year- rouaduse: Equpmeattandlegscan- eaus_pseiidisplacemmt To reduce this, carefidly lay out log trails and roads, properly time work days anduse row-pressure- greatmd equipement, Soil slopes range 3 to 20 percent. Usemgproper drainage technique will lnhance and Inkfinivn eroisenmakinng merchantable treses in about thirty XTIrs. The stand of trees should not be opened widely to prevent windthrow Oallowly- rootedtrees:.. Slashmay be loppedsewped and scattered, or end- bumedaccording to a burning perrmG (if nceded):... I MANAGEMENT. Area 1 and 3 Thinning /Woodland Improvement This stand is fully stocked and will be thinned for firewood to improve stand quality and growth. Leave the trees that are vigorous, full - crowned (403 or more of the tree), well- formed (no significant sweep, crooks or other deformities), disease and insect -free, live dominant and co- dominant trees. In addition, favor leaving the conifers such as western redcedar and western hemlock for long -term timber potential. Area 2 Thinning /Woodland Improvement The stand is currently understocked with the planted Douglas fir forming a canopy that is about 503 closed. At this level, the trees have enough sunlight to continue to grow and add diameter to the trunk. However, beyond 70% closure the trees will compete for sunlight and the trees will significantly slow growth. A precommercial thinning, that removes every other tree, will be conducted within the next five years so that there will be more than 16 feet between each tree. To set back 953 or more of the red alder understory, cut: 1) Trees that are at least 5 years old, 2) During June and July, and 3) Stump heights that are 8 inches or less. (from "Control of Red Alder by Cutting,^ Research Paper PNW- RP -414.) Woodland Improved Harvesting In approximately 50 years, merchantable trees will be selectively removed. The stand should not be opened widely, to prevent windthrow of shallowly- rooted trees. Slash may be lopped and scattered, piled or burned according a burning permit (if needed). DECISIONS Selective Logging /Woodland Improvement Field 1 and 3 -- Continuous Woodland Improved Harvesting Field 1 and 3 -- 2024 Precommercial Thinning /Woodland Improvement Field 2 -- 1999 Woodland Improved Harvesting Field 2 -- 2044 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Cost -share assistance is available for forestry practices (such as noncommercial thinning) through the Agricultural Stabilization and conservation Service (ASCS). 'You must be signed up and approved for cost- :sharing before you begin the practice. Contact our local ASCS office at 6975. Hannegan Road, phone (206) 354 -3690 to apply for cost - sharing. Many forest practices require compliance with the Washington State Forest Practices Act. contact your local DNR forester before starting a forest practice. WHATCOM COUNTY OPENSPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Keith and Christine Johnson Designation: Transfer to OST 2681 Douglas Road Ferndale, WA 98248 Subarea: Cherry Point/Ferndale Subarea Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Zoning Desig.: R5A Parcel No.: Parcel Acreage: Acreage in OST: Road Access: Land Use: Shorelines: Land Use Histor Johnson OST 2004 390125 - 255172,278172 6.87 acres, 2.77 ac = homesite 2.91 ac. = OST, 1.19 ac. agric. Off Douglas Road Formerly agricultural N/A +Formerly part of a farm. Soil Tvpe /Capabilities 12 Birchbay silt loam, 0 -3 percent slopes. Site Index`: Douglas fir 115 Limitations /Concern Seasonal high water table, puddling when soil is wet 179 Whatcom silt loam, 3 -8 percent slopes. Site Index`: Douglas fir 116 Limitations /Concern Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness, puddling when soil is wet 180 Whatcom silt loam, 8.15 percent slopes. Site Index': Douglas fir 116 Limitations /Concern Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness, puddling when soil is wet Timber Management Plan Completeness (0= incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2---thorough, Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description - Timber Type J7: Approx. 2.91 acres - does not meet acceptable level for RCW 84.34.020 (3) Soils Description 2 All soil types: concern regarding seedling establishment, root depth restriction by seasonal high water table. Forest Health - NIA Harvest Plan - N/A Thinning Program WA Planting /Restocking Program N/A Wildlife Habitat Enhancement NIA TOTAL RECOMMENDATION: DENIAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval 'Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. 14 �: -, :, T�'^� Y n l9 Forest Land Management Plan L_ Levorsen Family Tracts West %s of the Southeast 1/4, Portions of the Northeast'' /, of the Southwest '' /y and the Southeast %. of the Southwest 1/4, all in Section 25, Township 39 North, Range 1 East, W. M. Whatcom County, Washington Prepared for: ATTN: Mr: Lorren K. Levorsen Levorsen LLC Lorren K. Levorsen Residence Trust Thelma C. Levorsen Residence Trust Keith. A. and Christine E. Johnson 2691 Douglas Road Femdale, WA 98248 -8906 Prepared by: John D. Gold John Gold & Company, Consulting Foresters 619 Commercial Avenue, Suite 25 Anacortes, WA 98221 (360) 299 - 8166 Final draft: January 2, 2004 JAN 3 0 2004 Y JOHN GOLD & COMPANY, CONSULTING LD FORESTERS Timber Cruising and Appraisal Timber Sale Administration Foresffand Management 679Cavmerclal Avemre Anacodes, WA 99221 Plane 366.299.8166 Fax 366.598.1966 Email goid@fidaW.net Levorsen Family Tracts: in Section 25, T 39 N, R 1 E Inspected by: John D. Gold Date of inspection: November 26, 2003 Tax Account Nos.: 390125- 1751440000, - 219054 -0000, - 332130 -0000, - 367194 -0000 ( Levorsen LLC); 390125- 197110 -0000 (Lorren K. Levorsen Residence Trust / Thelma C. Levorsen Residence Trust); 390125- 255172 -0000, - 278172 -0000 (Keith A. and Christine E. Johnson) Current assessment status: Gross area: 128.15 acres Forested area: 36 acres +/-' Area suitable for OST/DFL status: cres bv current assessment status pen Space- Farm Highest and Owner Parcel nd Agricultural Best Use Levorsen LLC 1176144 5.00 12190a 33.11 332130 56.58 367194 19.70 LK & TC Residence Trusts 19711 6.89 KA & CE Johnson 255 120 acres +/_3 if The purpose of this Forest Land Management Plan is to serve as a multi- resource planning document in support of enrollment as Open Space - Timberland (CST) and/or Designated Forestland (DFL) in Whatcom County as prescribed in RCW 84.34. It is also intended to be suitable in support of application for inclusion in 1) the Forest Land Enhancement Program (FLEP) and/or Forest Stewardship Plan Reimbursement Program (FSPRP) as administered by the Washington Department of Natural Resources and/or 2) the Forestry Incentives Program (171P) m administered by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. It is intended to guide the landowners in long -term management of 1 Source: Whatcom County Assessor's Office records. s Excludes areas currently cleared for agricultural and residential use. ' Excludes only areas cleared for residential use and associated outbuildings. Remaining acres would have to be afforested to be suitable for OST/DFL status. 172 4.20 278172 2.67 Gross area: 128.15 acres Forested area: 36 acres +/-' Area suitable for OST/DFL status: cres bv current assessment status pen Space- Farm Highest and Owner Parcel nd Agricultural Best Use Levorsen LLC 1176144 5.00 12190a 33.11 332130 56.58 367194 19.70 LK & TC Residence Trusts 19711 6.89 KA & CE Johnson 255 120 acres +/_3 if The purpose of this Forest Land Management Plan is to serve as a multi- resource planning document in support of enrollment as Open Space - Timberland (CST) and/or Designated Forestland (DFL) in Whatcom County as prescribed in RCW 84.34. It is also intended to be suitable in support of application for inclusion in 1) the Forest Land Enhancement Program (FLEP) and/or Forest Stewardship Plan Reimbursement Program (FSPRP) as administered by the Washington Department of Natural Resources and/or 2) the Forestry Incentives Program (171P) m administered by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. It is intended to guide the landowners in long -term management of 1 Source: Whatcom County Assessor's Office records. s Excludes areas currently cleared for agricultural and residential use. ' Excludes only areas cleared for residential use and associated outbuildings. Remaining acres would have to be afforested to be suitable for OST/DFL status. their forested and nonforested acreage in Whatcom County. In keeping with the dynamic nature of both forest systems and the planning process, it is expected that this Plan will be reviewed periodically and revised, if necessary, to reflect changing conditions. The OST program is designed by statute-to preserve the current use of property. The RCWs specifically provide that an OST property be contiguous ownership of one or more parcels of five acres or greater which is devoted "primarily to the growth and harvest of forest crops for commercial purposes ". The Open Space Program is also targeted at providing benefits from forest areas including: 1) the conservation or enhancement of natural, cultural or scenic resources; 2) the protection of wetlands and natural shorelines; 3) the protection of soil resources and unique or critical wildlife and native plant habitats; 4) the promotion of conservation principles and educational opportunities, and; 5) enhancement of the value of adjacent natural areas, sanctuaries and open spaces. A DFL property must be "contiguous ownership of 20 or more acres which is primarily devoted to and used for growing and harvesting timber." A complete Forest Land Management. Plan is essential to supporting new enrollments in Whatcom County's OST and DFL Programs. Because of the unique features of the Levorsen Family properties, it is an excellent candidate for inclusion in the OST or DFL program. Open Space -Farm and Agriculture (OSA) properties may be transferred to OST and/or DFL without additional tax, interest, or penalty, subject to all applicable qualifications for the new classification. FLEP/FSPRP are federally funded programs intended to provide financial incentives to non - industrial private forest landowners to "manage their property using an integrated multi- resource approach." Cost - sharing for specified land management practices is available, as determined on a case -by -case basis, on properties between 20 and 1,000 acres. An approved Forest Stewardship Plan is required to access cost -share funds towards these practices. FEP is a federal program intended to share the cost of reforestation and timber stand improvement, on non - industrial private forest land properties between 10 and 5,000 acres. An acceptable Forest Management Plan is required to access cost -share funds towards these practices. The Levorsen Family properties are an excellent candidate for inclusion in the Stewardship Incentives Program and Forestry Incentives Program. Timber Type 5 (approximately 4.5 acres) is agricultural land scheduled for afforestation in spring, 2005. This Type corresponds to the South 150 feet of the Levorsen LLC parcel (390125- 219054- 0000). Soils are mapped as VJhitehom silt loans. Standing water was present over much of the area during November, 2003, inspection. Site Index was not estimated, but the adjoining property supports a moderately stocked mature stand of alder and cottonwood; based on soil type, Sitehtdex for red alder is likely about 90. This stand does not meet acceptable stocking levels for forest land in WAC 222 -34 -010 and supplemental reforestation is required (for enrollment in OST/DFL). Timber Type 6 (approximately 1 acre) is agricultural land scheduled for afforestation in spring, 2005. It represents a dogleg adjacent to Type 2 which is difficult to manage for agricultural purposes. Soils are mapped as Whi[ehom silt loams..Site Index was not estimated; based on soil type, Site Index for red alder is likely about 90. This stand does not meet acceptable stocking levels for forest land in WAC 222 -34 -010 and supplemental reforestation is required (for enrollment in OSTIDFL). Type 7 (approximately 4 acres) includes a farm pond, associated wetlands, and neighboring grain field. These areas are managed principally as habitat for migratory waterfowl, fish, and other aquatic species Type 8 (approximately 67 acres + / -) includes all remaining agricultural and residential lands. All areas other than about 4 acres (principally residential and ag building uses) would be suited to growth and harvest of commercial forest crops if afforested. Timber Type JI (approximately 2.91 acres) is a moderately stocked stand of 60+ year old hardwoods and conifers. This Type corresponds to the South 500 feet of the Johnson parcel (390125- 255172- 0000). Red cedar and red alder comprise the majority of merchantable volume; Douglas fir and bigleaf maple are also present. Site Index is estimated to average about 110, or high -Site Class M. Merchantable volume is estimated to be about 10 to 15 MBF per acre. Growth rate is moderately slow, and declining, and is estimated to currently average about 0.3 to 0.4 MBF per acre per year. Mortality in red alder is moderately high. Timber Type J2 (approximately 1.19 acres) is agricultural land scheduled for afforestation in spring, 2004. This Type corresponds to the South 500 feet of the Johnson parcel (390125- 278172- 0000). Soils are mapped as Whatcom- Labounty silt loans. Site Index is not possible to estimate; based on soil types and adjoining merchantable timber, Douglas fir Site Class is likely about III. This stand does not meet acceptable stocking levels for forest land in WAC 222 -34 -010 and supplemental reforestation is required (tor enrollment in OST/DFL).. 132 Timber Type 33 (approximately 2.77 acres) is currently developed for residential and incidental agricultural uses. This Type corresponds to the North 250 feet of the Johnson ' � parcels (390125- 255172 -0000 and -- 278172- 0000). WHATCOM COUNTY OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Dick and Janet Glide Gilda OST 2004 Designation: Open Space Timber Transfer from Designated Forest Parcel No.: 380419- 326456 -0000 and -0002 Parcel Acreage: 13.36 acres Acreage in OST: 11.36 acres Road Access: 2727 Jensen Road Land Use: Residential and forested land. Land Use History Residential, pasture and timber land. Soil Type/Capabilities: #156- Squalicum gravelly loam, 5 -15% slopes - 100 %lot coverage Site Index* 132 - Douglas fir Not prime agricultural soil. Limitations /Concert Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness. Seedling mortality and establishment, competing vegetation. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0= incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 2 Douglas fir, Western red cedar, hemlock, red alder and bigleaf maple. Soils Description 2 2 Typical woodland soil units. Forest Health 2 2 Forest health meets WAC 222 -34- 010(2) requiremis, being well- distributed, vigorous and undamaged stock. Harvest Plan 2 2 Leave Stand 3 to mature but remove red alder seedlings. Stand 4 - small c /earcuts within mature tree stands. Thinning Program 2 2 Management control of invasive species is. salmonberry, hand slash brush. Planting /Restocking Program 2 2 Stand 3 and 4 - replant w /conifers 600 stemslacre, thin to 150 approx. 150 treeslacre. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 2 Snags, tall stumps and brush piles will provide for wildlife habitat. TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval `Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. 2727 Jensen Road Bellingham, WA 98226 Subarea: Lake Whatcom Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Zoning Desig.: R5A Shorelines: N/A Gilda OST 2004 Designation: Open Space Timber Transfer from Designated Forest Parcel No.: 380419- 326456 -0000 and -0002 Parcel Acreage: 13.36 acres Acreage in OST: 11.36 acres Road Access: 2727 Jensen Road Land Use: Residential and forested land. Land Use History Residential, pasture and timber land. Soil Type/Capabilities: #156- Squalicum gravelly loam, 5 -15% slopes - 100 %lot coverage Site Index* 132 - Douglas fir Not prime agricultural soil. Limitations /Concert Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness. Seedling mortality and establishment, competing vegetation. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0= incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 2 Douglas fir, Western red cedar, hemlock, red alder and bigleaf maple. Soils Description 2 2 Typical woodland soil units. Forest Health 2 2 Forest health meets WAC 222 -34- 010(2) requiremis, being well- distributed, vigorous and undamaged stock. Harvest Plan 2 2 Leave Stand 3 to mature but remove red alder seedlings. Stand 4 - small c /earcuts within mature tree stands. Thinning Program 2 2 Management control of invasive species is. salmonberry, hand slash brush. Planting /Restocking Program 2 2 Stand 3 and 4 - replant w /conifers 600 stemslacre, thin to 150 approx. 150 treeslacre. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 2 Snags, tall stumps and brush piles will provide for wildlife habitat. TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval `Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. FOREST LAND STEWARDSHIP bOUVWENENT PLAN 1/12/98 Forester; Boyd Norton Landowner: Richard Gilds Address: P.O.-Box 31071 Bellingham. WA. 98226 Phone: Home; 360 - 733 -7018 Work; 360 - 676 -0885 Legal Description: NE1 /4 NW1 /4 Sec.19, TWN, 38 North, MG. 4 East, W.M. Acres: 50 County: Whatcom 1 Stewardship Stewardship is the act of caring for the land. It is a practice of "giving back" to the earth. Stewardship recognizes that there is a relationship between humans and the land that sustains us and that humans must live in balance with the earth. As in any good relationship, taking personal responsibility is required, an action is voluntary. Good stewardship requires careful consideration of the needs of the land, the landowner, and the larger human and non -human community around them. stewardship, however, is as much an opportunity as a responsibility, although, the benefits of stewardship are different for different people. Some landowners seek the enhanced quality of life achieved by retaining the natural and cultural - values of their property for recreation and enjoyment. others may wish to protect the natural functions while also achieving direct economic benefit from the property. - Resource planning too often is seen as solely a scientific enterprise. In reality it is much more a socio- political process. Systems are often the most prolific and creative on their edges, where two types came together, like forest and meadow, water and land. Selecting the appropriate stewardship strategy involves: 1) assessing needs (this includes an awareness of opportunityea and limitations for both the landowner and the site), and 2) choosing tie stewardship options which best fit these needs. It is not uncommon for a stewardship strategy to include spore than one stewardship option and employ more than one technical /financial support program. After a strategy is decided upon, then one seeks the technical and financial resources to get the job done'. .. As a forest landowner, you qualify to participate in the Stewardship Incentive Program, sponsored by the Department of Natural Resources. The goal of this program is to offer technical assistance in applying environmental and economic resource management principles to non- industrial private forest landowners. The aim of the Stewardship Incentives Program is to provide direct benefits to the landowner, and to society in general. This forest stewardship management plan is tailored to your goals f6r+ySuk property. stewardship means maintaining, enhancing and protecting water, air, soil, fish and wildlife resources; providing quality outdoor recreation; and providing a continuing supply of forest products. This stewardship management plan discusses methods for achieving. stewardship objectives. Enrollment in the Stewardship Incentive Program began when you approved this plan. Congratulations and welcome,to the .program! If you have any questions please give me a'call at 360 -856 -3500. Stand Acres site Stocking Stand Description 1 9 132 NA FIELD 2 3 130 NA BUILDINGS 3 6 132 10020 HARDWOODS, SCATTEk'b Co NIFte 3'i i32 9890 CorvlpeR. bcq IT6Y.6C IOwmU •IA: 'J;• J Y TM7 am This 50 acre parcel contains several large man made and enhanced wetlands and man made ponds. There is two acre home site and a pasture that has been used for cattle and hay. This property was originally home steaded by the Ross family and purchased in 1965. The property is gently sloping with old road grades throughout. The condition of the unimproved portion of this ownership provides excellent opportunities for forestry and wildlife management. LANDOOWNEBS OBJECTIVES: To leave the land and forest ecosystem in a better condition. To enhance the timber, wildlife, wetland and aesthetic values of the property. To be able to have a sustainable harvest of timber. RESOURCE CATEGORY I: FOREST HEALTH A) RESOURCE INVENTORY /CONDITION DESCRIPTION There are few indications of forest health problems on this site. The Grand Fir and Silver Fir in unit 4 show some signs Of needle rust. Control of this type of disease is not feasible under forest conditions. There are brush and plant species that act as hosts to this type of disease, which would need to be removed from this site as well as adjoining Ownerships. Since the rust is a normal part of the environment select trees will continue to be affected. At this time there were no other health problems noted. B) RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES Since there are only scattered true firs on this ownership and they are of various ages, the merchantable trees should be removed if the rust has not affected more than the top. 1V of the tree.. .Since this site does not contain an abundance of large snags. Those trees that have been severely affected should be left to create habitat for cavity nesting wildlife as well as perch and roost habitat for raptures. Wildland fire protection is provided by the Washington state Department of Natural Resources. Logging slash from a timber harvest may create an extreme hazard requiring abatement. In general, the law requires that any "additional fire hazard" within 100 feet of public roads or 200 to 500 feet of residences or public use facilities shall be abated. Abatement may, fox example, be accomplished by burning, chipping, Or removing the slash from within required limits. RESOURCE CATEGORY 2: TINE= AND WOOD PRODUCTS A) RESOURCE INVENTORY /CONDITION DESCRIPTION This ownership is made up of several different stands that have evolved from the management of this parcel as a farm and homestead. Stand three contains some pole size conifers, mostly Western Red Cedar. There is scattered mature alder throughout the stand. Areas have been partial cut within this stand and there are alder saplings growing in the openings, red cedar is also coming in naturally. This stand also contains a man made pond that is surrounded mostly by hardwoods of different size classes. Stand four contains mostly Douglas Fir, cedar and scattered true firs. The majority of this stand is merchantable timber with conifer under story. There is a large forested wetland in the northwest portion of this unit. There is also d.ow small man made ponds in this unit. '(w ,+ B) RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES Stand three should be managed as two units. The main part of the stand can produce conifer saw timber. The area around the pond should be managed as a mixed hardwood conifer stand. There are two reasons for this. Wildlife needs will be better met by managing both the hardwoods and conifers within 75 of the pond. Also trying to produce strictly conifer trees adjacent to the pond will be very labor intensive. Stand four can be managed either by select harvesting or by cleat cutting. The aesthetic values and wetland values will be easier to maintain by select harvesting. All harvesting on'this ownership should be accomplished using low ground pressure equipment and should be accomplished during the driest months of the year. C) RESOURCE MAMAGEMENVENHANCEMENT RECOMMNDATIO14S Stand 3. No harvesting should occur within this stand for the next five to ten years. At this time the alder seedlings should be removed to allow for growth and establishment of the cedar and hemlock that has seeded in naturally. When harvesting occurs within this unit there should be a representative stand remaining. In other words, there should be trees in all diameter classes and species left after thinning. Do not remove only the better trees since this would decrease the value of future thinning. The stand should be interplanted after the first two harvests with hemlock, fir and cedar seedlings. Planting should occur after the threat of frost has diminished usually in early March. Trees should be planted on an 84x8' spacing. This is approximately 600 stems per acre. This will provide good quality seedlings needed to maintain the stand. As thinning progresses over time the defective and less vigorous trees will be .removed and those that provide good quality seed will be left. The area adjacent to the pond should have very little management at this time. Within 75' of the pond a mixed stand of conifer and hardwoods should be managed. Both species should have mature trees left to become wildlife habitat. Brush species around the pond provide both nesting and foraging habitat. As mature trees die out of this stand open areas can be reforested with cedar seedlings. As the stand matures young trees will need to be pruned in order to maintain growth and quality wood. Approximately 150 trees per acre that will remain after the first thinning, should be pruned. The first pruning should occur when the trees are at least 3" in diameter at 4' above the ground. Pruning should be conducted every 3 to 5 years until approximately 24' of the tree has been pruned. This Would require pruning in lifts of 6 to 12 feet. The crown to stem ratio should never be less than 50 1 after pruning. If this stand is ever clear cut . the area should be replanted with conifer species. The majority of the unit should be replanted with Douglas Fir, Western Hemlock and Western Red Cedar can be intermixed with the fir. They should be planted in the areas that are generally wet throughout the growing season. The stocking used should be as large as possible. This would be either 2 -0 or 1 -1 stock. Stocking should be approximately 600 stems per acre, which is a spacing of 8'x8'. Stand 4. This stand is a mix of conifer and hardwoods. Most of the stand is mature except for some small areas that have been logged over time. Timber management of this stand should be much the same as stand three. small clearcuts can be made within the stand and reforested with conifer species. The stand can also be managed continually as an uneven aged stand. Harvesting can be accomplished over portions of the unit every five to ten years, with inter- planting in openings to provide quality seedlings for future harvests. Refer to other aspects of this plan for more detailed information on additional enhancement measures. To prepare a site for planting, scarify the ground and pile or windrow the slash with a cat equipped with a rake blade or a hydraulic excavator. Scarification should only be done on slopes under 35 percent and during periods of dry weather, and .should not be done along streams or in wet areas. otherwise soil disturbance and compaction may result that can permanently reduce the productivity of your land. If you wish to burn the piles or windrows you must obtain a burning permit from the department of natural resources. Piles may be as high and as wide as the cat or excavator is capable of constructing. Dirt -free piles will burn cleaner and quicker. The piles should be at least 50 feet from all structures, power lines, and trees. To maintain wildlife habitat some smaller piles approximately 8'x8' should be created for nesting and dining areas. At approximately stand age 51 this plantation would need a conifer release in order to maximize the conifer growth rate and remove the competing hardwoods. For approximately 10 years following the planting of conifer seedlings red alder can be a detriment to the establishment of a conifer plantation. Alder can quickly over top a. conifer plantation and cause a severe decrease in annual growth. If not controlled the alder will eventually cause conifer mortality to occur. Red alder can be controlled either by the use of herbicides or by hand .cutting. Herbicides are generally applied in the spring either by helicopter or by back pack spraying. spraying should occur when the alder is approximately 3/4 leafed and prior to the new buds opening on the conifer. The herbicide should be applied according to the manufactures recommendations and in accordance with the Forest Practice Rule's and Regulations. Hand cutting is effective for reducing alder competition_ The main problems with hand cutting are sprouting and damage to conifers from the cutting operation. The following guidelines should be followed to avoid these problems. A. Cutting should be done before alder competition becomes so severe that conifer height growth begins to slow down. The alder should be at least four and preferably five or six years old. B. To avoid sprouting hand cutting should be accomplished between June 1 and August 30. C. Cutting should occur below the lowest live limb and not more than 6" above the ground. If cutting below the lowest live limb is impractical, all live limbs should be cut from the stump. D. Cut all alder within 15 feet of a conifer tree. Where there are no conifers, thin the alder to a 10' average spacing. E. Take care when cutting alder to not damage the young conifer trees. Do not leave cut stems lying on, or leaning against conifers. WILDLIFE RESERVE TREES Washington forest practices law WAC 222 -30- 20(11) requires that for each acre harvested three wildlife reserve trees, two green recruitment trees, and two down logs shall be left to provide for wildlife habitat needs. Every point . in a harvest unit must be within 800 feet of a wildlife reserve tree or green recruitment tree retention area. There is an exception: The distance is increased to 1,000 feet if 30 percent to 70 percent of the required wildlife reserve trees are left, preferably in clumps, within a forested wetland. Wildlife reserve trees are dead trees or live defective or deformed trees that are at least 10 feet tall and 12 inches diameter at breast height (dbh). Green recruitment trees are at least 30 feet tall and 10 inches dbh with at least 1/3 of its height in live Crown. Live defective trees with broken tops, cavities, etc., are preferred. Down logs must be at least 12 inches in diameter at the small end and at least 20 feet long or have equivalent volume. ROADS Because of the large area covered by wetlands within unit four, road construction maintenance and timing of use will be very critical for maintaining the quality of the wetlands.Good ditches should be constructed on all roads and should be grass seeded. Culverts should be located to drain onto the forest floor and natural vegetation.. Catch basins can be constructed on the inlet and outlet to allow for sediment to settle. The catch basins should be cleaned out as needed. Where the road crosses the wetland the grade should be raised, and a culvert placed on top of the existing grade. This will allow the wetland to continue to function normally and will allow for access that will reduce and minimize the impacts frcla road construction and log hauling. Pages 10 thru 22 of the "Forest Practice Illustrated". guide provide good information on road planning construction and maintenance. RESOURCE CATEGORY 3: SOILS A) RESOURCE INVENTORY /CONDITION DESCRIPTION ' SOIL TYPE The State Soil Survey lists the soils on this site as Squalicum Gravelly Loam series. According to the Department of Natural Resources Soil Survey, this soil is moderately well drained, has a rooting depth of 40 inches, is easily compacted when moist, can be severely damaged from scarification and plant competition to conifer seedlings is severe. The 50 year site index indicates that Douglas Fir trees should reach approximately 132 feet in height in 50 years. See soil description tables for further information. B) RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES - The concerns for forest management on these soils is centered around the soil survey definitions for high compaction potential, severe damage from - scarification, and severe competition from brush species. Compaction potential. The potential for compaction which reduces the growing capacity of the soils is significant the soil is moisture sensitive and has large changes in density with changing moisture content. After initial compaction the soil will support standard equipment but will continue to compact with each subsequent pass. If this soil is operated on during periods of saturated soil conditions the growing site could be lowered by as much as one site. The soil would take approximately 50 years, one growing cycle, to recover from damage. Scarification damage. The potential to damage the soil during scarification is based on the same thoughts as for compaction. Track and wheeled equipment may damage the surface layer of the soil. Damage would be less in the driest months but still have significant long term effects. Plant competition. Plant competition refers to the invasion of brush species when openings are made in the canopy. A severe rating means that competition can be expected to provrnt establishment of conifer seedlings. See appendix for more detailed explanations. C) RESOURCE MANAGEMENT/ENNANCEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS To prevent unnecessary damage to the soils any ground based logging should be done with low ground pressure machinery. As much as practical, all management activities should use the existing skid roads and trails!. This will limit the amount of soil production that could be loss from designing new roads. Any scarification to remove unwanted slash and brush should be confined to only the heaviest concentrations where planting would not be feasible without site preparation. Both operations should only be conducted during the driest months. After reforestation has occurred the site will need to have the brush controlled either by spraying or hand cutting. It would be best to accomplish reforestation the first planting season after harvest. This will give the seedlings a jump on the brush. RESOURCE CATEGORY 4: RIPARIAN AND WETLAND A) RESOURCE INVENTORY /CONDITION DESCRIPTION: There are three water sources on this site of concern: A man made pond exists on the east portion of this property. The pond is surrounded by hardwoods, cattails . and brush species.. Water quality in the pond appears to be good, the riparian area adjacent to the pond would benefit from enhancement. There is a small stream that drains this pond, crosses am existing toad and enters a man made wetland on the west . portion of the property. The forested wetland on the westerly portion of this property is in excellent condition. The riparian area is made up of mature and immature hardwoods and conifers. There is a road that cross towards the south end of the wet land that needs some improvement to protect the wetland Wetlands: Even the term captures our awkwardness or conflict as we combine two of the earth's most powerful core elements: water and land. Lost in our new scientific jargon are the unique fens, marshes, bogs, and swamps that reflects our historical connection with each individual site) each site with unique function and contribution to the hydrological cycle. The universal term of "wetlands" too often leads,to over - simplification of the complexity of each dynamic place where water and land are one: Evaluating the wetland on the property: Knowing the condition of a wetland allows for an assessment of its overall sustainability. Key items to consider: What is the type of wetland? Under the Forest Practice Rules this wetland is considered a class C. Which means the wetland has more than 306 of the surface area covered by Forest vegetation. What percentage of the total property does the wetland occupy? The weted area of this wetland is approximately two acres in size. The hydric soil function of the wetland is probably close to four acres. The hydric soils that make up the exterior boundary of the wetland extend to a point where the soil is saturated with water, dark green /brown in color to a depth of less than 18 As you can tell the affects of this wetland go far beyond the visual affected area. What functions does it provide? Wetlands improve water quality by trapping sediments and assimilating pollutants and excess nutrients. They also recharge groundwater and maintain stream flows, control runoff and store flood waters, reduce erosion, and stabilize shorelines. Wetlands provide critical feeding and breeding habitat for fish and wildlife, including threatened, endangered, and commercially important species. Additionally, wetlands offer recreation and scenic opportunities and provide outdoor classrooms and laboratories. Flooding, degraded water quality, limited water supplies, habitat loss, and sedimentation or erosion are some of the most common environmental problems Washington communities face. However, as wetlands are lost upstream, erosion, flooding, and sedimentation of lakes and rivers increases downstream. Decreases in wetlands affect waterfowl and other wildlife populations dependent on wetlands. Especially, declining fish populations can be closely tied to the decline and degradation of wetlands and riparian vegetation. In Washington, many anadromous salmon species (and /or stocks) are becoming threatened or endangered. The State's development of a wild salmonid policy (outlining goals and objectives for salmon recovery) recognizes that wetlands and wetlands stewardship will play a critical role in creating a viable future for Pacific Northwest salmon. The Pacific Northwest salmon crisis reinforces the importance of wetlands to our local economy. Certainly, healthy wetland ecosystems are needed to maintain our economic resource base. Nationally, the coastal marine fishing industry annually harvests over $10 billion of commercial wetlands - dependent fish and shellfish, including trout, perch, catfish, menhaden, shrimp, oysters -, and crab, as well as salmon. Wetlands save millions in annual flood, erosion, and storm damage by temporarily storing flood waters and slowing water velocities. Damages from these problems already cost the nation $3 to $4 billion annually in revenues. To identify key features and characteristics of the wetlands the Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodoloov can be used. Currently, it is the best tool for gauging the relative quality and potential functions of wetlands. However, there are several limitations regarding its application: 1) it was designed as a community planning tool to make comparisons between many sites, not simply evaluate one, 2) it will not properly evaluate urban wetlands unless the urban criteria are used, 3) it was designed specifically for Oregon wetlands, although Washington wetlands are similar, and 4) it is for freshwater systems only. Places you can go to get help for managing the wetland are: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife field staff, local area wetland consultants, resource staff at Natural Resource Conservation Service offices or Conservation Districts, and sometimes wetland resource volunteers with local land trusts. Lastly, it is important to consider the role of the wetland in the basin or watershed. The preparation toward selecting a stewardship strategy that meets the challenge of contributing to the larger watershed perspective has become more critical in the Pacific Northwest. At one time this wetland was probably part of a larger system that has been altered by county roads and development. This wetland could have been connected to carpenter creek and used by cut throat trout, beaver, and waterfowl. B) RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES RIPARIAN AREAS:. Logging activities should be sited away from the riparian area to avoid impacting the riparian vegetation and overall quality of the pond and wetland in any way. It is particularly important that the cover offered by vegetation growing in the riparian area not be removed. If logging is necessary within 50' of the wetland it should be done by select harvesting of no more than 308 of the merchantable trees in any 10 year period. This will ensure sufficient shade, hiding cover, a vegetative filter for protecting water quality, and provide adequate security for nesting water fowl. To protect water quality in the wetland the stream draining the pond needs to be protected from disturbance. Any timber harvesting needs to include a plan for felling and yarding away from this channel. The channel crossing should be improved by installing ..a 12" culvert, rocking the head wall and catch basin, placing an .energy dissipator at the out fall of the culvert to reduce erosion. Hauling of forest materials on the road should be restricted to dry weather hauling. C) RESOURCE MANAGEMENT /ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Pond 1. Create a mixed stand of cedar, hemlock and hardwoods with associated brush species for a distance of 50' on all sides. 2. Encourage the growth and development of conifer by cutting brush and hardwood saplings within 15' of any conifer. 3. Improve habitat for cavity nesting: birds and wood ducks. Create snags from several conifer trees that are over 16" DHH. 4. Place resting platforms or logs for water fowl. wetland 1. Maintain natural stand structure and composition 2. Investigate enlarging the South end to create more open water. 3. Maintain and improve access road to minimize sedimentation from use. 4. Restrict timber harvesting and hauling to only the driest months and days of no precipitation Stream 1. Install culvert where stream is crossed by access road. 2. Improve catch basin, head wall and outfall areas by rocking sides and bottom. 3. Prevent disturbing stream bed and banks during timber harvesting. RHSOORCE CATEGORY 5: FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT A) RESOURCE INVENTORY /CONDITION DESCRIPTION This parcel contains a very good mix of habitats for a variety of species. The property has open fields, young and old forest characteristics., riparian vegetation and habitat. The only short coming is the lack of snags and trees with cavities. The following species and habitats are possible on this ownership: 10 Species known to occur in older timber stands include: Ruffed Grouse - Found in deciduous and deciduous /conifer forest with dense understory; strongly associated with aspen. 808 of diet consists of vegetation including buds of aspen, birch, willow blackberry and apple; also leaves of clover. Nests on the ground next to a fallen tree or log. Nest is a deep depression lined with feathers. awainsoa•s Thrush- Found in moist woodlands and swamps. Winters from Mexico south to Argentina. Feeds on insects and some berries. Nests in shrubs or in low conifers. Nests constructed of weeds, wood sometimes with a middle layer of mud topped with leaves and moss. Black - tailed near -See publication, Chestnut - backed chickadees- Breeds in conifer or mixed conifer forests. Nests in natural or excavated cavity. Nest lined with moss, fur or feathers. Feeds on insects including spiders and conifer seeds. Golden Crowned Ringlet - Breeds in open coniferous forests. Nests in hanging nest constructed near beaches usually hung from branches. Nest open at top with oblong cavity, constructed of moss, spider web and lined with fine materials. Rvening Grosbeak - Found year round in the forests of Washington. Breeds primarily in coniferous forests. Nests are usually 20 feet or more up in a conifer in a cup- shaped nest well out on a horizontal limb and made of twigs and roots and lined with finer material: Feed on pine seed, wild cherry, cedar and dogwood. During summer 208 of diet consists of insects, primarily beetles and caterpillars. Studies conducted in Washington have found a single individual will consume 12,600 - 26,400 western spruce budworm per summer. Are attracted to sunflower seeds at feeding stations. Varied Thrush - common in dense, moist , coniferous forests. Present year round in western Washington may migrate south in eastern Washington. Nests in a small conifer against the trunk in a nest of mud, dried leaves, reinforced with twigs and .lined with grass.. Feeds primarily on insects during summer including beetles, ants, caterpillars and snails. In winter. 848 of diet is wild fruit including madrone, and snowberry. Stellar's Jay - Found in conifer or mixed conifer forest. Diet composed of 70% nuts, seeds and fruit including oak and elderberry. and 308 insects largely wasps . with some beetles and grasshoppers as well as bird eggs. Nests'in conifer on a horizontal branch or in crotch. The bulky nest is made of twigs, leaves, cemented with mud and lined with conifer needles or grass. Gray Jay - Found in coniferous forests throughout the state year round. Nests on a horizontal branch near the trunk off a conifer in a well woven nest of sticks, bark and grass fastened together with spider silk and lined with fine material. Feeds primarily on insects, fruit and carrion. Sharp- shinned Hawk - Found year round in most of Washington except far east only during breeding season. Inhabits mixed woodlands. Nests 10 -60 feet up in conifer next to trunk. Nest broad and flat, of stick and twigs and lined with finer twigs. Feeds primarily on birds which are taken on the wing. 11 Haven - Common through state, year round. Nests in cliff or tree in nest of twigs, lined with shreds of bark or hair. Diet consists primarily of carrion, also small vertebrates, eggs, garbage, insects, fruit or seeds. The following species have been found to use riparian habitats: Belted Hingfisher - Found on small streams where it feeds primarily on fish. Nests are excavated in a steep cut away bank close to the water, at the edge of a road or along a gravel pit. The nest consists of a long tunnel constructed 1 -2 feet from the top of the back and extending 4-10 feet into the bank where a small nesting hollow is .located. The tunnel opening is usually 2- 4 inches in diameter. Great Blue Heron - Feeds on fish, insects, mice and frogs. Nests in colonies in trees in large, flat nests constructed of interwoven sticks, lined with twigs and leaves. May live up to 23 years. Rufous Hummingbird - Feeds on nectar, insects and tree sap. Breeds in conifer forests and forages in adjacent meadows. Nests primarily in conifers usually on a drooping limb. Nest made of plant down, covered with lichen, leaves and bound with spider silk. Nests are often clustered. Winters south to Mexico. Herwiek's Wren - Found in open woods and along stream edges. Feeds on insects including spiders. Nests in natural cavities in a nest of twigs and grass, lined with feathers. osprey - Found along rivers, lakes and coasts. Feeds primarily on fish but occasionally rodents, birds and crustaceans. Nests in deciduous or coniferous tree near water. May also use nest structure (instructions included(. Nest constructed of sticks and sod or cow dung. Winters south to Chile and Argentina. Only raptor with front talons turned backward. May live up to 21 years. Bald Hagle- Limited numbers found year round throughout Washington on sea coasts, along rivers or lakes. Listed as threatened species in Washington any activity within 1/4 mile must of nest may be subject to Eagle Management Plan. Often nests in fork of large dominant tree in nest of large sticks deeply lined with fine materials. Feeds on fish, especially salmon, birds and some small mammals. Coopers Hawk- Occurs throughout the state year round in broken woodlands or streamside groves, especially deciduous. Nests primarily in deciduous trees in • broad flat or narrow deep nest of sticks and twigs located in the crotch of • conifer or by the trunk in a deciduous tree. Feeds on birds flying low through the woods or small mammals. Hooded Merganser - Found in forested habitats near water. Feeds on fish and aquatic insects. Nests in tree cavities near water. will use nest boxes. Heaver- Active throughout the year, the beaver is primarily nocturnal. Beaver living along creeks generally build dams that usually incorporate a lodge, which has one or more underwater entrances and living quarters in a hollow near the top. Wood chips are put on the floor of the lodge to absorb excess moisture and a vent admits fresh air. Preferred construction materials as well as primary foods include willow, birch and maple. Believed to pair for life, beavers mate in January or February and produce 1 -8 kits 4 months later. The young remain with their parents for 2 years. 12 Mallard - Breeds in shallow ponds or marshes. Nests on the ground in a -nest constructed of cattails, reeds and grass and hidden by surrounding vegetation. Feeds on sedges, aquatic vegetation, grain, acorns and insects. May live up to 23 years. River Otter - Feeds primarily on fish and some frogs. Dens are dug in the bank with underwater as well as above ground entrances. Inside a nest is constructed of sticks, reeds and grass. 1-4 young are born blind in the spring, weaned at 4 months and disperse at 8months. Wood Duck - Feeds primarily on aquatic vegetation including pondweed, and duckweed. Nests in tree cavities, lined with woodchips and down. Readily uses nest boxes however with increasing density of nest boxes, nest dumping increases. Clutches of from 15 -50 may develop as a result of multiple females 'dumping" in a single nest. McGilvrey (1 960) recommended nest boxes be placed in clusters of 5 -10 spaced 50 -100 feet apart within clusters. Bellrose (1 976) recommended nest boxes be placed in groups of 2 -4 per acre. - Gadsall - Found in freshwater marshes in grassy, brushy areas. Feeds on grass, aquatic plants and grain. Nests on the ground in concealing grass cover. Nests made of surrounding vegetation, lined with down. Winters south to Mexico. Red- Ringed Blackbird - Feeds primarily on insects, the seeds of weedy .. plants and farm crops including: corn, wheat and oats. Usually nests in reeds, near or over water in a cup shaped nest of woven sedges, and grass and winters south to Costa Rica. May live up to 15 years. Species expected . to along edges, clearcuts and meadows include: Rufous -sided Womb"- Breeds on the forest edge or in riparian thickets. They nest on the ground under a shrub in a nest of Leaves, grass and bark.: Feeds on insects, grass seed and berries. American Goldfinch - Breeding habitat includes weedy fields, open deciduous and riparian woodland. Nests are cup shaped occurring in the fork of a branch and often woven so tight the nest will hold water. Constructed of herbs, and lined with plant down, often the outer rim is bound with spider silk. Feeds on weed seeds including: thistle, ragweed and shepherds - purse, seeds of deciduous trees, buds and berries. Forms flocks of up to 400 during winter. Snowshoe Ware - Remains brown all year in western Washington and Oregon. During the day snowshoes rest in hollow logs venturing out on overcast days. In summer they feed on grasses, willow and berries. During the winter they feed on conifer buds, the bark of alder and willow. Douglas' squirrel - Active throughout the year. Nests in trees in ball nests constructed of mosses, twigs and bark. Feeds on conifer shoots, nuts, mushrooms and berries. Cedar waxwing - Feeds on red cedar berries, chokecherry and other berries. - Nests at the forest edge in shrubs or conifer trees. Nests cupped shaped of twigs, and moss, lined with grass, moss or hair. Often moves in feeding flocks. 13 Bed- tailed Hawk - Feeds primarily on rodents (856(, birds and reptiles_ Nests in the crotch of a large tree with a expansive view. Nest constructed of sticks and twigs, lined with bark. Winters south to Panama. May live up to 21 years. stellar• Jay - Found in conifer or mixed conifer forest. Diet composed of 70t nuts, seeds and fruit and 30% insects and bird eggs. Nests in conifer on horizontal branch or in crotch. Nest bulky, of twigs, leaves, cemented with mud and lined with conifer needles or grass. - Bong sparrow - Found in dense vegetation along watercourses, coasts and marshes in forests edges, clearing and gardens. Feeds primarily on insects including beetles, grasshoppers and crickets during summer also feeds on seeds of weedy herbs. Nests on the ground beneath grass shrub or brush pile. Nests made of grass, and herbs lined with fine materials. May live up to 11 years. American Crow- Common throughout state. Nests in coniferous or deciduous tree in nest of twigs, and bark and lined with shredded bark, grass, hair or leaves. Feeds on animals including: grasshoppers, beetles, amphibians and reptiles, and grain crops including: corn, wheat, barley and oats. Band- tailed Pigeon- Breeds in coniferous forests in western Washington. Nests in the fork of a horizontal branch in conifer. Nests is a crude, shallow nest of crossed twigs sometimes lined with pine needles. Winters south to Nicaragua. Feeds on wild cherry, pacific dogwood, elderberry, madrone and salal. Golden Crowned sparrow- Winters in western Washington in dense woodlands. Breeds in Canada and Alaska. Feeds on grass seed, piqweed, chickweed and mullein seed. Black- headed Grosbeak- Common in open forests and edges. Nests in shrubs in bulky nests of twigs, stems and lined with rootlets. Feeds on insects including beetles, grasshoppers, caterpillars ants and snails. During spring and summer feeds on elderberry and wild cherry. Winters south to southern Mexico. Dark -eyed Junco- Found in coniferous and mixed woodlands throughout the state year round. Nests on the ground in a hollow depression with overhanging cover. Nest of grass, most and twigs and lined with fine materials. Winter feeds primarily on insects including beetles, ants and caterpillars. In summer and fall feeds mainly on weedy species including chickweed, pigweed, barley and miners lettuce. - Fox Spasms- Present in western Washington during winter and breeding in eastern Washington. Found in the dense undergrowth of coniferous or mixed woodlands. Nests on the ground in nest of grass, was, rootless, and lined with grass, fur or feathers. Feeds on millipedes and ground beetles, ragweed, bearberry and pigweed. Mountain Quail- Found year round in western and south eastern Washington in overgrown cleared areas and burns in coniferous forest. Nests on the ground concealed by shrubs in a shallow depression lined with leaves, pine needles, grass and a few feathers. often near water. Feeds primarily on vegetation including lupin, clover and some grasses. 14 Northers Flicker- Found in suburban and open woody areas throughout Washington. Nests in excavated cavity in a dead tree, post, house or in nest box. During summer feeds on insects including ants, beetles and grasshoppers. In winter primarily feeds on vegetation including: oak, and elderberry. Buttons vireo- Found in western Washington in moist Woodlands. Nests primarily in broadleaf tree especially oak in a cup nest suspended by its rim from the fork of a twig. Nest of lichen, bound by spider silk and lined with grass. Feeds on insects including spiders and berries. Eastern Kingbird - Breads on the forest edge or in riparian woodland. It nests midway up an isolated shrub on a branch in a nest of weed stems lined with grass, hair or feathers. American robin - Prefer openings as opposed to dense woods and is fond of orchards. Feeds on caterpillars, ground beetles and earthworms. Nest is a mud cup lined with fine grass constructed in shrubs, buildings or on the ground. May live up to 13 years. Cavity Nesters Many of the cavity nesters, including the ones observed on your property, provide the forest with protection against harmful insects.. The chestnut- backed chickadee for instance, will consume over 6 budworm per hour. Pilsated woodpeckers- usually excavate new nest cavity each year, In western Washington, these trees are usually in dead western white pine, Douglas-fir or western hemlock with a dbh of at least 30 inches (Lundquist et. al. 1991) and a height of at least 30 feet. These trees are usually classified as hard snags (in the early stages of decay) . In order to provide for the nesting needs of this species, it is important to leave large hard snags that provide a suitable nest medium for Pileated woodpeckers. In addition to providing for nesting, Pileated woodpeckers need roost trees. Because they do not migrate south during winter, they must spend the cold months in roost trees that provide enough insulation from cold to enable them to survive the winter. They typically excavate roosts in the fall in old - growth grand fir because the large diameter of these trees accommodates a hollow chamber large enough for the woodpeckers to enter 24 -54 feet above the ground. In northeast Oregon, the majority of hollow trees are grand fir because of the prevalence of the Indian paint fungus that decays the heartwood. In order for this species to be able to roost successfully, -grand fir snags at least 20" dbh and 24 feet must be retained. Bad- breasted Sapsucker- is a westside cavity excavator that is common in coniferous or mixed forests in coastal ranges, usually at lower elevations. Ants make up a large part of the sapsuckers' diet. In addition, it feeds on tree sap by sucking it out through the bark inaseries of pit like holes in a variety of tree species. Warblers, hummingbirds and other species also use these sap wells. Nests are excavated in live or dead alder, cottonwood or aspen. Nests are located at heights between 8 and 40 feet. Bed- breasted nuthatch prefers mature timber stands with large, decaying trees. They excavate nesting cavities in rotten branches or stumps. Their primary diet is insects during summer and almost exclusively conifer seeds during winter. 15 Species observed in pasture areas include: Bullock b oriole Found in riparian woodlands and ,open areas with scattered trees. Feeds on insects including caterpillars, beetles, ants as well as some nectar and fruit. Nests usually in deciduous tree in a long woven sac -like nest suspended at the end of drooping branch. Nest woven of plant fiber strips and lined . with grass, down oz,hair, Winters south . to south. America. Fasters Tanager- Found in conifer and mixed conifer forest. Feeds primarily on insects including wasps, bees, ants and beetles. During spring and summer feeds on fruit including cherries, elderberry and serviceberry. Nests in a conifer in the fork of a horizontal branch out from the trunk. Nest con -. strutted of twigs, moss and lined with hair and rootlets. song Sparrow - Found in dense vegetation along watercourses, coasts and marshes in forests edges, clearing and gardens. Feeds primarily on insects including beetles, grasshoppers and crickets during summer also feeds on seeds of weedy herbs. Nests on the ground beneath grass shrub or brush pile. Nests made of grass, and herbs lined with fine materials. May live up to 11 years. B) RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES DOWN WOODY DEBRIS A diverse forest should have an average of at least 2 downed logs of at .least 12" dbh and 21' long per acre. Smaller. diameter .trees left on the forest floor will also contribute to the structure of the forest.. 1) Place downed trees and slash on the ground where possible. 2) Leave all existing large diameter logs. 3) When stands are thinned, leave some or all of the larger poles on the ground. Leave branches and other :small .diameter .materials on the ground to decompose and enhance the soil. nutrients. 4) If heavy amounts of slash remain after thinning, lop and scatter or gather and stack trees removed in the thinning ..Process to clear travel lanes and provide access for deer. Reserve Trees In order to provide for safety, wildlife reserve trees that pose a safety hazard to logging or planting operations are not required to be left. 1) Leave all existing standing dead or .dying trees not killed by root rot )trees killed by root rot . probably will not remain standing long enough to become the best snags) . Allowing trees which are dying through natural phenomena to remain standing is one way to assure that the forest has a healthy snag component. On average, depending on tree species and other conditions, it may take 1 0 to 20 years from time of death for a snag to become fully useful to snag dependent wildlife species. However, a large diameter snag usually continues to be useful to wildlife for well over 50 years, depending on its species and the kinds of decay and other factors to which it is subjected. Rl 2) Identify and mark live trees that can be topped or otherwise killed to create snags in the future (snag recruitment trees) . These can be trees that are defective in some way, such as having a crooked bole or heavy, low growing limbs, or they can be the largest diameter trees available, if timber harvest for commercial purposes is not planned. 3) Tall stumps will also be used by some species. Consider leaving tall stumps if large diameter trees are harvested to enhance the variety of structures available to wildlife in your forest. Do not remove any existing tall stumps. 4) Cavity availability can be enhanced. by placing nest boxes in appropriate locations. See enclosed nest box plans designed for species that could be encouraged on the site. C) RESOURCE DOWIGEMENVENBANCEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Nest boxes are a way to simulate nesting structure in nature they are only a stop gap measure for providing nesting habitat until natural nest site are available some on the structure you should consider are: NORTHERN FLICKER NEST BOXES Install nest boxes for Northern Flickers in open wooded areas on dead trees 6- 30 feet above the ground. Pack nest box with wood shavings. The flicker requires shavings to Simulate its excavating the cavity in the nest box. CHICKADEE. NEST BOXES Until young stands . reach adequate age and structure to provide for snags and natural cavities, nest boxes can be installed for Chestnut - backed chickadees and Red - breasted nuthatch. Boxes for both birds should be placed 5 -15 feet off the ground. It is important to note however, that nest boxes are not a replacement for snags, since many woodpeckers do not use nest boxes but must excavate their own cavities and that snags are also an important source of insects that feed many species of birds and other animals.. BERWICK'S WRENS NEST BOXES Along creek, nest boxes can be installed for Berwickfs wrens. Place in a partly sunny spot 4 -10 feet above the ground. BAT BOXES If bats are known to be present, the installation of a bat box or two and the subsequent occupation by bats will help keep pesky mosquitos under control while you sleep. The average bat consumes 600 mosquitos per hour! CREATING SNAGS Trees may be topped or the tops blasted out to create a snag for the future. Blasting appears to be safer and create a better "snag" than topping with a saw. The use of explosives in green trees to create new snags has been in use by the U.S. Forest Service for some years. A suitable tree for blasting is one that is at least 20 inches dbh. These trees are climbed to a height of approximately 60 feet and a hole is drilled and the explosives put into the trunk. This method reduces the amount of explosives needed and keeps the blast noise down to a minimum. Only qualified personnel trained in tree climbing and with a blasting license should attempt this procedure. This practice is cost sharable under SIP. BRUSH PILES Create brush piles using branches from wind- throw, slash, or pruning. See "Managing Small Woodlands for Wildlife" by Gutierrez et al., page 15, figure 10 for a method of creating brush piles. 17 FORAGE SPECIES TO PLANT FOR BIG CANE There are Several Shrub species that can be planted to provide browse for deer and food and cover for smaller animals_ Redstem ceanothus. and Shiny leaf ceanothus are good food sources for deer. Mountain ash and serviceberry are shrubs that provide berries that both game and nongame animals will use. Initially these types of plantings will need to be protected from animal damage. Netting or fencing around individual group plantings Would. work. WILDLIFE SEEDING MIX Foraging areas can be enhanced.with forage seedings. Seeding landings, skid roads, and other disturbed openings with a mixture of 50& Dutch white or, alsike clover and 50% orchard grass will provide excellent. food for 'deer and elk. Seeding is best done in the fall, although spring seedings -will also be successful. RIPARIAN FORAGE SPECIES FOR WILDLIFE You may want to plant berry producing shrubs in the meadows and near wet areas. suggested species are hawthorn, . service berry, mountain ash, snow berry and elderberry.. Other shrubs that would . be beneficial are red stem . ceanothus and wild raze. I have attached a catalog of available trees and shrubs or you can order through the conservation district WILDLIFE ENHANCEMENT 'PONDS - - - It might be beneficial to create a. small opening close -tothe pond. Within this opening, in addition to planting clover, you may be able to increase the diversity of the area by planting shrubs and deciduous trees such as red-osier dogwood (Corns stolonifera), chokecherry (Prunus virginiana) and elderberry (Sambucus racemosa.or eerulea): - - In the trees close to the pond you may attract wood ducks, tree swallows and wrens by installing nest. boxes. Also it would be very beneficial to retain large snags in this area. In the pond itself you may cable logs along the banks if they are not already present. These logs will serve as loafing platforms for turtles . and waterfowl that may use the pond. BAND- TAILED PIGEONS - FORAGE NEEDS Some small openings should also be maintained preferably in areas where elderberry and salal are found. These shrubs are all very important for wildlife like band- tailed pigeons which have declined dramatically in recent years. RESOURCE CATEGORY 6: TSREATEMM OR ENDANGERED SPECIES, CULTURAL RESOURCES A) RESOURCE INVENTORY /CONDITION DESCRIPTION A Federally Endangered species is a species of plant or animal in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. In Washington state these species are: Aleutian Canada goose Peregrine falcon Gray wolf Grizzly bear Columbian white - tailed deer Mountain caribou A State Endangered species is a species of plant or animal, native to the state of Washington, that is seriously threatened with extirpation throughout EU all or a significant portion of its range within the state. Endangered species are legally designated in WAC .232 -12 -014 and are as follows: American white pelican Brown pelican - Aleutian Canada goose Peregrine falcon Sandhill crane Snowy plover Upland sandpiper Spotted owl Gray wolf Grizzly bear Columbian white- tailed deer Mountain caribou A Federally Threatened species is a species of plant or animal which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. In Washington state these species are: Oregon Silverspot butterfly Bald eagle Spotted owl. Marbled murrlet Cultural Resources There axe no Known cultural resources listed for this ownership. This area was a customary use for, the NOOCksack. and Luami Tribes.. The main uses of the area included gathering and hunting for food, ceremonial activities such as questing. B) RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES There are no listed threatened species or cultural site on this ownership C) RESOURCE MANAGEMENT /ENHANCEMENT P' Management practices as stated in the portions of this plan relating to wildlife, timber management, and water quality will enhance and protect the site for future acceptable habitats for threatened and endangered species. Specific practices are: 1 Maintenance of a mixed forest stand. Both age classes and timber type. 2. Improvement of riparian area adjacent to pond. 3. Maintenance of wetland ecosystem and wetland riparian area. 4. Creation of snags or allowing trees over 20^ d.b.h. to become snags. RESOURCE CATKGORY 7: ALSTKZTIC8 RECREATION A) RESOURCE INVENTORY /CONDITION DESCRIPTION The site has been managed since homesteading for multiple uses. The value of aesthetics and family recreation have been excellently maintained. B) RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES Stewardship management of the entire parcel will continue to protect the aesthetics and recreational uses of this ownership. 19 C) RESOURCE MANAGEMENT/ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Maintain trails and roads as necessary for access and protection of .water. quality. E. widen the riparian area adjacent to the pond and include areas for viewing wildlife as they are using the pond area. The viewing ate should be concealed in order to prevent disturbing forging and nesting wildlife. S. Selectively harvest mature timber rather than clearcutting. 4. Continue planting conifer and wildlife forage seedlings RESOURCE CATEGORY 8: AGRO- FORESTRY, SPECIAL FOREST PRODUCTS A) RESOURCE INVENTORY /CONDITION DESCRIPTION There has been many micro stand types developed on this ownership from past management which provide great opportunities to manage for special forest products. B) RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES - Continued multiple use management along with select .harvesting will ensure adequate opportunities for special forest products. C) RESOURCE MANAGEMENT/ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDATION 1. Mix Pacific silver fir into the reforestation proposal to create a mixed forest as well as an opportunity for boughs and Christmas trees, E. Continue to maintain the mix of mature and immature forest for production of a variety of special products such as; vine maple for nursery Stock, sword fern, bracken fern, salal, western red cedar tips, and Oregon grape for floral greens. 3. Plant nut species for wildlife forage, personal use and :potential sale. FM 10 YEM PLAN The following courses of action are recommended over the next ten years. Tyhe landowner is not required to complete these recommendations and may accomplish alternate enhancement projects as they see fit. Years 1 thru 5 create a mixed stand around the pond in unit three Install nesting boxes for Wood Ducks Enhance drainge of the pond in unit three Select harvest of mature conifers Begin pruning conifer - years 5 thru 10 Select harvest areas that show root rot. Interplant species that will not be affected by root rot conduct a pruning of trees at least 10 years old Remove competing vegetation from around conifers Continue with select harvesting as needed Create snags plant wildlife forage 21 FOREST STEWARDSHIP PLAN SIGNATURE PAGE (Attach this page to the plan) PLAN PREPARED BY (Primary author, if more than one): /rJ7.CIn.I J/Jal9It'' -- Plan PreWer Is: Signature ate ❑ Private Natural Resource 13o40 A/ol2TOII) Professional Print Name J Agency Representative /1E5ouCCE P20TEZT /Ort) F02EST Landowner Pk Landowner Who Pk LJA- 0 rue. Completed Coached Agency /Company - Stewardship Planning CI 19 A.)0ZTH T ,tn)$iWto RA Course Address S 6b 00 W 012 L L b'Y 14A ari<tlTy O Landowner Who Is a Natural Resource Professional 3( moo) 8s6- asoo Phone List other professionals, and their affiliations, who contributed to this plan. If this was a "Coached Plan" list natural resource professionals who serve as "coaches." LANDOWNER SIGNATURE: The contents of this plan are acceptable to me/us. Uwe intend to manage this property in a manner consistent with the objectives of the Forest Stewardship Pro t and to implement this plan to th t o my /our ability. .6�Z04L ZQt 99l BSaedowner signature(s) C�Date / - 1tA"41- &A An Li7,, J `z r- d / 2 Print Landowner Name(s) , APPROVAL SIGNATURE: I have reviewed) th�isr�pl�an and approve it as meeting the standards for a Forest Stewardship Plan. ,ci /f l O,Te J /-/z- 99' BONO A)Dpi yj Print Name of Designated Service Representative 12eswere Pmztb Trow WA / )k Title Agency 9/9 Al01ZTH TownlShtP 21) Address (360) SS6- 3500 Phone \ k/ k � ^/\ \ \ /\ -u A e \ ƒ }$ } \{ .� \\ \ /) \ \ ( j \ \ m } ( § / \ ( » \ § 0 iF \\ \j G \ x ,_ �( ) i\ y{ . / £I 3 ! \ k/ k � ^/\ \ \ /\ -u A e \ ƒ }$ } \{ .� \\ \ /) \ \ ( j \ \ m } ( § / \ ( Schulz (Pullar) DST 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Steve Schulz Designation: Open Space Timber 524 Maxwelton Street Hinesville, GA. 31313 Subarea: Lynden /Nooksack Valley Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Zoning Desig.: R5A Shorelines: N/A Soil Type /Capabilities: New Timber Management Plan Parcel No.: 390431 -074303 Parcel Acreage: 20.61 acres Acreage in OST: 20.61 acres Road Access: 5200 block Mission Road Land Use: Forested land. Land Use History Forested land. #182- "atcom silt loam, 0.8% slopes -100% lot coverage Site Index* 116 - Douglas fir Not prime agricultural soil. Site index* Red Alder - 90 Limitations/Concen Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness. Seedling mortality and establishment, competing vegetation. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0—incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2=thomugh) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 2 Douglas fir, Western red cedar, red alder, birch, bigleaf maple and black cottonwood. Soils Description 2 2 Typical woodland soil units. Forest Health 2 2 Forest health meets WAC 222 -34- 010(2) requirem'ts, being well - distributed, vigorous and undamaged stock- Harvest Plan 2 2 Rotation of 5 acre clearcut harvests beginning 2010, next 2015/20 etc.. Thinning Program 2 2 Management control of invasive species ie. salmonberry, hand slash brush. Planting /Restocking Program 2 2 12'x 12'spacing of 2' Douglas fir and 2' Western red cedar, minimum 300 seed/ings/acre. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 2 Maintaining integrity of a healthy and sustainable stand of trees will provide wildlife habitat. TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval 'Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. FORESTMANAGEMENTPLAN For WHATCOM COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER 390431- 074303 -0000 Prepared For the Continuance As Open Space Timber As Per RCW 84.34.020(3) Sl /2 of Gov't. Lot 2 (SW1/4 NWl /4) Less road Section 31 Township 39 North, Range 4 East of the Willamette Meridian Whatcom County Consisting of 20.61 + /- Acres of Forest Land Site Address: Mission Road CURRENT LANDOWNER Douglas L. Pullar 5541 Guide Meridian Bellingham, WA 98226 -9785 PURCHASER Steve Schulz 524 Maxwelton Street H'mesville, GA 31313 David N. Anderson Forestry Consultant 20105 Gina Marie Lane Burlington, WA 98233 -5207 360 - 757 -0052 September 30, 2003 FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Whatoom County Parcel Number 390431 - 074303 -0000 This property is currently owned by Douglas L. Pullar. The property is for sale. The PURCHASER is Steve Schulz. The property can be described as follows: S 1/2 of Gov't. Lot 2 (SW 1/4 NW 1/4), less road, of Section 31 all within Township 39 North, Range 4 East, W.M., containing a total of 20.61 + /- Acres of forest land. This property has been managed as forest land. This Forest Management Plan is prepared for the Continuance As Open Space Timber classification as per RCW 84.34.020(3) for the 20.61 + /- acres of forest land. This property has been in Open Space Timber classification since the lien date of May 1, 1986. The current zoning is R5A The minimum lot size is I homesite per 5 acres. The goal of the owner is to retain the integrity of the property by maintaining a stand of trees. This will provide for sustainable timber harvests, wildlife habitat, watershed management and recreational activities. The object is to provide for a future return on the investment through good forest management. The forested area is made up of 1 type, or stand, of timber as follows: Stand (Type) #1; 20.61 + 1- acres in size is a mature stand of mixed native conifers and mined native hardwoods. The conifers are; Red Cedar, size class 2, 3, & 4 (D4h of 8" to 24 "). Douglas Fir, size class 2, 3, & 4 (D4h 10" to 30 "). Red Alder, size class 2 (D4h of 6" to I 1 "), Birch, size class 2 (134h 6" to 11" ). Bigleaf Maple, size. class 2, 3, & 4 (D4h 8" to 36 "). Black Cottonwood, size class 3 & 4 (D4h 12 to 36"). (134h is the diameter of the tree at 4 feet above stump height.) The age of the stand is 55 years of age. This stand is Fully Stocked and meets WAC 22234- 010(2) requirements. There is one (1) soil type on the property. Soil data is from the USDA SCS and Washington State DNR Soil Survey of Whatcom County Area, Washington. Page WIIATCOM- LABOUNTY SILT LOAM, 0 to 8% slopes. The DNR soil number is 9094. The SCS soil number is 182. This map unit is on glaciomarine drift plains that are hummocky. The 50 year site index for Douglas Fir is 116 and is Whatcom soil. The 50 year site index for Red Alder is 90 and is Labounty soil. This means that the average Douglas Fir will grow to a height of 116 feet in 50 years and that the average Red Alder will grow to a height of 90 feet in 50 years. This soil is stable in both a natural and a distributed state. This soil type is a mixture of Whatcom and Labounty soils and it is not feasible to map the soils separately. The Whatcom soil is deep and moderately well drained. The Labounty soil is very deep and poorly drained. There are 20.61 + /- acres in this soil type. Stand (Type) #1 is a mature stand of mixed native conifers with native hardwoods. The conifers are Western Red Cedar and Douglas Fir. The hardwoods are Red Alder, Birch, Bigleaf Maple, and Black Cottonwood. This stand is fully stocked with commercial native tree species and meets stocking requirements of WAC 222 -34- 010(2). The age of the stand is 55 years. It is recommended that the owner consider beginning final harvests any time there is a need for cash. Consider doing 4 small clear cuts of about 5 acres in size. Consider a harvest schedule of a 5 acre dear cut every 5 to 10 years. An example would be the first 5 acre harvest in year 2010, the second 5 acre harvest in year 2015 to 2020. Continue until the entire 20.61 acres has been harvested and reforested. Restrict any harvest to the dry season (July to October). Ground base Portions of the logging slash, or debris, which will be created, will be classed as an extreme hazard and will have to be eliminated, abated, or reduced. Reforest by planting during the fast planting season following any harvest. The planting season for this area is mid -March to early Aoril. Plant these seedlings only after the effects of any COLD Northeaster wind period has passed. Reforest by planting at least 150 2-0 Douglas Fir seedlings and 150 2-0 Western Red Cedar seedlings per acre. This is 12' X 12' spacing. Consider harvesting of the timber only when there is a high demand for timber, and/or when one has a need for cash. Repeat the above practice of small 5 acre clear cuts every 5 to 10 years until the entire acreage has been harvested and reforested. Economics indicate that one needs to harvest timber at about age 50 to 55 or compound interest on ones' investment will exceed any money received. It is recommended that any final harvest at age 50 to 55 be a clear cut. It is recommended that any harvest be restricted to the dry period (July to mid October.). The harvest method for this area can be a ground based skidder and/or cat providing the harvest is done during the `dry' season. Reforest any area that is harvested during the first planting season after harvest. The planting season for this area is March 15 to April 15. After the harvest, it is recommended that the owner plant at least 300 seedlings per acre. Plant a mixture of Im Douglas Fir (150 2 -0 seedlings per acre) and Western Red Cedar (150 2 -1 seedlings per acre) using a spacing of 12' X 12' between planted seedlings. A 2 -0 seedling is 2 years old and has been grown for 2 years in the same nursery bed. A 2 -1 seedling is 3 years old. It was grown for 2 years in the original nursery bed and grown for 1 more year in a nursery transplant bed. Plant these seedlings during the first planting season after the harvest. A timber harvest will create logging slash and in this area within 100 feet of Mission Road and within 500 feet of any home, barn, garage, etc, this slash will be classed as an Extreme Hazard. An Extreme Hazard has to be abated, reduced, or eliminated or the Owner and Operator are responsible for any fire costs and damages, regardless of the cause of the fire. One will need to monitor the planted area to insure that the seedlings are growing and are not being suppressed by brush species such as Salmonberry. The owner needs to protect the stand from fire. Paying the Forest Patrol Tax each year does this. When the landowner chooses to do a timber harvest, it will be necessary to obtain an approved Forest Practice Application (FPA) as required by RCW 76.09 Forest Practices. This can be obtained from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Creation of logging debris, or slash, within 100 feet of a public road or 500 feet from a home, barn, garage, etc. is classed as an Extreme Hazard as defined by RCW 76.04.660 and WAC 332 - 24-650. Any Extreme Hazard must be reduced, abated, or eliminated. The Northwest Region of the DNR is currently located on Highway 9 in Sedro- Woolley. The owner is allowed to harvest up to 5,000 board feet per year for his own use (but not to be sold) without obtaining an approved FPA- (For His Own Use can be defined as having the timber custom sawed for building of a home, barn, shed, etc., or for firewood.) Any timber harvested within the State of Washington pays a 5% Yield Tax at time of harvest. The State of Washington Department of Revenue collects the Forest Excise Tax. At the completion of a timber harvest it will be necessary to reforest the land as required by RCW 76.09 and WAC 222 -34 Reforestation. It is recommended that the owner plant any harvested area during the first planting season following harvest. Plant 300 2 -1 Western Red Cedar seedlings per acre, or 300 2-0 Douglas Fir seedlings per acre (12' X 12' spacing), or a mixture of Cedar and Fir. The planting season is normally January through April, but for this area restrict planting to March 15 to April 30. Tree Page seedlings are available from the Webster Nursery of the DNR that is located south of Olympia. The DNR at Sedro - Woolley will have current information regarding the purchase of tree seedlings. A 2-0 seedling is 2 years old and has been grown in the same nursery bed. A 2 -1 seedling is 3 years old, having been grown for 2 years in the original nursery bed and 1 year in a nursery transplant bed. The planted seedlings will require monitoring for brash encroachment during the first 5 years, or until the planted seedlings are growing above any competition such as Salmonberry. Brush species can be controlled either by hand slashing (or cutting) or by the use of approved chemicals. If one uses chemicals, obtain information from the DNR or the County Extension Service for correct usage and dosage. If one uses the hand slashing method, then it is recommended that this practice be done only during the months of July and August to prevent the sprouting of the cut stumps. It is recommended that the owner consider hand fertilizing of any planted Douglas Fir seedlings after the first growing season. Consider applying about 1 teaspoon (or about 0.01+ pounds per tree) of Urea fertilizer scattered around the base (4 to 8 inches from the seedling stem) of each planted seedling. Most forest soils in Western Washington are Nitrogen deficient. This type of fertilizer application will last for 5 or more years. It is highly recommended that the owner obtain the services of a professional forestry consultant prior to any timber harvest and reforestation activity. The DNR office at Sedro - Woolley can supply the owner with a list of professional forestry consultants. The consultant can assist the owner in obtaining an approved Forest Practice Application, finding a timber harvester, and reforesting the harvested area. It is also recommended that the owner have a professional forestry consultant do a detailed timber cruise and timber appraisal prior to any planned timber harvest. It is highly recommended that the property boundaries that have been marked by a licensed land surveyor be maintained. The surveyor has set lath stakes on the property line. It is recommended that the owner place a metal fence post at each lath stake to maintain these survey marks. This will eliminate any confusion as to property boundaries. The owner understands that one must have 5.0 or more acres of foresdand for the property to be classed as Open Space - Timber. The current zoning may allow an additional single family residence to be constructed on this property. One must check with Whatcom County to insure the proper zoning and acreage requirements for any additional homes on this property. If a home is constructed, then the owner of record will withdraw one (1) acre from the Open Space — Timber Tax Program for each single family residence constructed. The owner of record will pay any back taxes and /or penalties for the acreage withdrawn from the Open Space— Timber Taz Program. LM It is the owner's responsibility to protect the forested area from fire. This property is assessed for the State Forest Fire Patrol. The owner's responsibility is accomplished by paying the State Forest Fire Patrol assessment each year. (Protection of buildings on a homesite is accomplished by paying the yearly assessment for the local rural fire department.) IZ SOIL TYPE MAP & TIMBER TYPE MAP SCS #182 DNR #9094 Whatc=44barWy Silt 1.0 0 to 8% Slopes 20.61+/- Acres Site Index RA90 & DFl l6 Sitem&R Type I - Mixed Cautious with hardwoods Sire II & IR Site Index DF116 & RA90 Age 55 Years Origin 1945 20.61+/ - Acres Current Owner Douglas L. Pullar Purchaur Steve Schulz Whatcom County Parcel Number 390431 -074303 -0000 Sl/2 of Gov't Lot 2, less road Section 31 Township 39 North Range 4 East, WM, Whatoom County Containing 20.61+1- Acres Scale I"= 400' o goo s� � rcet Prgwed By David N. Anderson Forestry Consultant 20105 Gina Marie Lane Burlington, WA 98233 -5207 360 - 757 -0052 September 30, 2003 Chapter 222 -34 -010 WAC - The Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 3 About Us I Contact Us I Eanail Lists I Search I Hel Legislature Home I Senate I House of Representatives Inside the Legislature TITTLES WAC 222 TITTLE_ >> WAC 222_- 3_4.CHAPTER Prir Find Your Legislator Beginning of chapter << 222 -34 -010 >>222-34-020 '*Vorking with the Legislature WAC 222 -34 -010 Required reforestation --West of Cascades *Legislative Summit. (1) Reforestation -where required. Calendars ftill Information (a) Unless the harvest application indicates that the land will be 4 aws and Agency converted to another use, or the lands are identified in WAC 222-34 - . Rules _0.50 as having a likelihood of conversion to urban uses, reforestation MLegislative is required for forest lands harvested after January 1, 1975 in the Agencies following instances: Legislative E -mail Lists (i) Clearcutting; or Kids Page Outside the (ii) Partial cutting where 50 percent or more of the timber volume Legislature is removed within any 5 -year period, unless the department Washington State determines that the live trees remaining will reasonably utilize the History and Culture timber growing capacity of the soils. WCongress -The other Washington (b) Reforestation is not required where: `ATV Washington *'Washington Courts (i) Individual dead, dying, down or windthrown trees are salvaged; svAccess WA or (ii) A tree or trees not constituting a merchantable stand are removed from lands in actual use for other purposes; for example, removal of individual trees from lands used for farming or grazing; or (iii) Trees are removed under a thinning program reasonably expected to maximize the long -term production of commercial timber; or (iv) A minimum of 190 vigorous, undamaged, well- distributed seedlings per acre of a commercial tree species are established on the area harvested and not more than 20 percent of the harvested area has from 150 to 190 seedlings per acre; or (v) A minimum of 100 vigorous, undamaged, well- distributed saplings or merchantable trees per acre of a commercial species or combinations thereof, remain on the area harvested. (2) Acceptable stocking. Stocking levels are acceptable if a htin / /www leo wn irov/ war./index cfm 9fiisea.ction= Sertion&Section= 222 -34 -010 3/3/2004 Chapter 222 -34 -010 WAC - The Washington State Legislature Page 2 of 3 minimum of 190 well- distributed, vigorous, undamaged seedlings per acre of commercial tree species or such lesser number as the department determines will reasonably utilize the timber growing capacity of the site, have survived on the site at least 1 growing season. "Well- distributed" means that not more than 20 percent of the harvested area contains less than a minimum of 150 seedlings per acre as determined by the department. (3) Competing vegetation. Competing vegetation shall be controlled to the extent necessary to allow establishment, survival, and growth by commercial species. (4) Artificial regeneration standards. (a) Satisfactory reforestation - clearcuts. Satisfactory reforestation of a clearcut harvest occurs if within 3 years of completion of harvest, or a period of from 1 to 10 years as determined by the department in the case of a natural regeneration plan, the site is restocked to at least the acceptable stocking levels described in subsection (2) of this section: Provided, That regeneration failures from causes beyond the applicant's control will not result in violation of this section, but supplemental planting or reforestation may be required except in riparian management zones (see WAC 22.2 -347030(4)). The department may grant an extension of time for planting or seeding if suitable seedlings or seeds are unavailable, or if weather conditions or other circumstances beyond the forest land owner's control require delay in planting or seeding. (i) Reforestation species. Where the species proposed for reforestation after timber harvesting differs from the removed stand, the department may approve use of the proposed species where the reforestation plan reveals that the proposed species is preferable from any of the following standpoints: (A) Site data indicates better potential production for the proposed species than the existing species. (B) Control of forest insects or diseases. (C) Greater economic return. (ii) Seedling or seeding standards. Except as approved by the department to qualify as acceptable reforestation, the seedlings or seeds must be from an appropriate seed source zone. The department shall establish seed zones and guidelines for their use. (b) Satisfactory reforestation - partial cuts. Where reforestation is required in connection with a partial cut, the harvest application httn: / /www. lee. wa .eov /wac /index.cfm ?fuseaction Section &Section = 222 -34 -010 3/3/2004 Chapter 222 -34 -010 WAC - The Washington State Legislature Page 3 of 3 shall include a plan for stocking improvement. The plan shall be approved unless the department determines that it will not reasonably utilize the timber growing capacity of the site. (5) Natural regeneration standards. A natural regeneration plan may be approved as acceptable reforestation if: (a) A seed source of well formed trees of commercial tree species, capable of seed production is available. (b) The owner of the seed source agrees in writing not to harvest the seed source for the time period specified in the plan, or until issuance of a satisfactory reforestation inspection report. (c) The seed source must consist of: (i) Seed blocks of sizes and locations shown on the plan and satisfactory to the department; or (ii) An average of at least 8 individually marked, well - distributed, undamaged, vigorous, windfirm seed trees per acre of plantable area and no inadequately stocked area is more than 400 feet from the nearest seed tree; and (iii) Competing vegetation shall be controlled to the extent necessary to allow establishment, survival, and growth by commercial species. (6) Any alternate plan for natural reforestation may be approved if it provides a practical method of achieving acceptable stocking levels as described in subsection (2) of this section within a period of 1 to 10 years. [Statutory Authority: RCW 76.09.040.87 -23 -036 (Order 535), § 222- 34 -010, fled 11/16/87, effective 1/1188; 86- 21-040 (Resolution No. 86 -2), § 222 -34 -010, filed 10/10186, effective 12/1/86. Statutory Authority: RCW 76,09_040 and 76.09.050. 82- 16-077 (Resolution No. 82 -1), § 222 -34 -010, fled 813182, effective 10/1182; Order 263, § 222 -34 -010, filed 6116176.] httD:H/ . lee. wa .aov /wac /index.cfTn?fuseaction— Section &Section = 222 -34 -010 3/3/2004 WHATCOM COUNTY OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Subarea: Comp Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Shorelines: Soil Type /Capabilities: #45— Edmonds - Woodlyn slopes Bob and Maryann Samms 6625 W.17 Avenue Ferndale, WA 98248 -9396 Ferndale /Cherry Point Rural R5A N/A foams, drained, 0 -2% SAMMS OS 2004 Designation: Open Space /Open Space Transfer from OSAG Parcel No: 390208 — 475147 and - 513147 Acreage: 1.84 ac + 3.16 ac = 5 acres less 1 acre for homesite Road Access: Matz Road Land Use: Residential #165 — Tromp loam, 0 -2% slopes SCS Soil Rating: Prime Public Access SCS Soil Rating: Prime SCS Soil Limitations: High water table, low soil SCS Soil Seasonal high water table, poor fertility, low avail. H2O cap. Limitations: filtering cap. in substratum. Basic Value Enhance scenic resources Keep woodland intact and healthy. Protect Streams /Shorelines N/A Score Max Public Benefit Value: Score Max :It Protect Soils and Wildlife 8.00 Homeowners' wildlife sanctuary area. Promote Conservation Principles 10.00 Conservation practices w /wildlife habitat for youngsters. Enhance abutting Open Space 8.00 Adjacent two sides to Open Space Recreation Opportunities 10.00 Trails, open areas, field sketching andpicnicking. Historic /Arch. Significance - N/A 10.00 Public Access 40.00% 40.00% Accompanying parking /rules. 10.00 Water Resource Protection 20.00% 20.00% Overlap ofhydrologic soils and geologic units. 10.00 Wildlife Habitat 20.00% 20.00% Diversity of birdlife, edge -type habitat 10.00 Parcel Size - 10.00% 10.00% OSOS less than 5 acres. -00.00 % 10.00 Abutting Open Space 5.00% 5.00% Open Space Ag on east and west 10.00 Natural Areas 4.00% 5.00% 4 acres in natural woodland. 10.00 Financial Advantage 0.00 % -40.00% N/A Discretionary Value 0.00% 40 + / -% N/A TOTAL 44.00 70.00 79.00% 140.00% Conditions: Must receive min. 45 points for approval Public Access Action: Sign Commission Hold Harmless Council Staff Report File OS 2004 April 16, 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT OPEN SPACE APPLICATIONS 2004 — Levorsen Family Tracts Open Space Timber 2004 — Eric and Vanessa Nielsen Open Space Timber (segregation and sale) 2004 — Bill and Merrilee Dodd Open Space Timber (upgraded TMP) 2004 —Oglesby Tracts Open Space Timber— Continuance bf OST with new Timber Management Plan 2004 — J.C. Walker and Laura Clark Open Space Timber (Transfer from Designated Forestry). 2004 — David Grossman Open Space Timber (Transfer from Designated Forestry). 2004 — Timberline Logging #1 Open Space Timber (Transfer from Designated Forestry). 2004 - Timberline Logging #2 Open Space Timber (Transfer from Designated Forestry). This report summarizes the Planning and Development Department's recommendations on Open Space applications received in 2003 and early 2004. The Open Space Taxation Act (RCW 84.34) was enacted in 1970 for two primary reasons: to create a tax climate that was equitable to the open space landowner and to decrease the rate which open space lands were bei g converted to non -rural uses. These were accomplished by providing property tax relief to land that qualifies under one of the following open space classifications: OPEN SPACE AGRICULTURE, OPEN SPACE FARM AND AGRICULTURE CONSERVATION, OPEN SPACE /OPEN SPACE and OPEN SPACE TIMBER. The agricultural designation is administered by the County Assessor whilst the Open Space, Timber, and Farm and Agriculture Conservation applications fall under the authority of the County Council. The process is handled in the same manner as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The Council decides on whether to grant the applicant assessment at current use after receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Open Space Timber is no longer subject to Planning Commission review under the Public Benefit Rating System. tem. Of the eight applications received, there is one new OPEN SPACE TIMBER application and four transfer applications to OPEN SPACE TIMBER from Designated Forest, and three new Timber Management Plans for previous OPEN SPACE TIMBER properties, now segregated. With change of ownership a Timber Management Plan has been submitted. The recommendations are based on the information gathered with the adopted Whatcom County Public Benefit Rating System and Timber Management Plan criteria. Staff Report File OS 2004 April 16, 2004 Staff evaluations and recommendations with maps and aerials showing location of each individual application are attached. REQUIREMENTS For the OPEN SPACE TIMBER category, approval is contingent upon conformance with RCW 84.34.041. This places an emphasis on approval or denial according to the completeness of the Timber Management Plan. The Timber management Plans are rated by staff on how complete they are in seven (7) categories and may receive up to 2 points for each category. Approval is recommended for those properties receiving a score of 7 or more and denial is recommended for those properties receiving a score of less than 7. If a property receives a score of less than 7 points, the property owner has an option to update their Timber Management Plan. All Timber Management Plans must be approved or denied within 6 months of their receipt. RECOMMENDATION For the OPEN SPACE TIMBER applications received, staff recommends the following: 1) Approval of the applications: Levorsen Family Tracts, Eric and Vanessa Nielsen, Bill and Merrilee Dodd, Oglesby Tracts, David Grossman and Timberline Logging #1 and #2. 2) Denial of the application: J.C. Walker and Laura Clark. ATTACHMENTS Overall Location Map Ratings for all applications with maps and aerials. Timberline Logging #1 DST 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY OPENSPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Timberline Logging Designation: Open Space Timber P.O. Box 2789 Transfer from Designated Forest Bellingham, WA 98227 Parcel No.: 400618 - 397337 nly. pin. Subarea: Foothills Parcel Acreage: 22.13 acres Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Forestry Acreage in OST: 19.16 acres Zoning Desig.: RF Road Access: 8600 blk. Silver Lake Road Shorelines: N/A Land Use: Forested land. Land Use History: Timber land. Soil Type/Capabilities: #6- Barneston gravelly loam, 0 -8 %slopes, 93% lot coverage Site Index* 118- Douglasfir Limitations/Concern Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness. Seedling mortality and establishment, competing vegetation. #144 - Sholcar and Fishhop sells, 0 - 2 %slopes, 7% lot coverage Limitations/Concern Swampy, ponded area in northeast portion of property. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0—incomplete; l= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 2 Majority of Umber harvested in 200213. Douglas fir, Western red cedar hemlock, red alder and bigleaf maple within buffer areas of pond and Maple Creek (anadmmous fish beating stream). Soils Description 2 2 Typical woodland soil units. Forest Health 2 2 Forest health meets WAC 222 -34- 010(2) requiremYs, no future forest health problems are anticipated within property. Harvest Plan 2 2 Majority of timber harvested in 2003, remaining timber is +/- 80 years old wim buffered areas. Thinning Program 2 2 Management control by thinning, pruning and brush control of invasive species. Planting /Restocking Program 2 2 Winter /Spring of 2004: planting of +/- 3,500 - 2 year old Douglas fir seedlings, +/- 185 per acre. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 2 Tall stumps and buffered stream and pond areas provides quality habitat for wildlife. TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval `Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. z i Z 5� r? �i 4zW q m Z 0 r mo N b �Q M 3 ti NNMMNNpN N� yW, h 2 t+ U W 33W�WnWWWWOW � bq O W 2 2 0 q .`h",`fi h!S OhyJ sgqhi sc�y y8y�� 0 'y h 4i 1agi iS�sS y�OS� V Oct F*4 ° UN 0 `1hNhb04^Ib j 88 2J b h � 22bhhh222 9 ti� Q o W d 6j �J 2 h �NMPMbAgq Q JJJJJJJJJ N d 6 U UU Dy0 a � F h o�M U Q O�Odd ey0b k O h 0 '3[N3= 0 3W =3W Ear hhh22 �hb N W M Pb E-o O WWWW ENO ° 0 Bg7.77' , �b'52oE AD s 13 �.. IAKE.; onl 472• 'RUNE AfE 5oW 4gp NINA , I3 mEY MAW (F 2q o_ 6z X LL W4 O-j z o Of vo w° a a& z� Timberline Logging #1 400618 - north lot i 9 M33903 _= D g~w U nio 4 N � N (n W W M O�Odd ey0b k O h 0 '3[N3= 0 3W =3W Ear hhh22 �hb N W M Pb E-o O WWWW ENO ° 0 Bg7.77' , �b'52oE AD s 13 �.. IAKE.; onl 472• 'RUNE AfE 5oW 4gp NINA , I3 mEY MAW (F 2q o_ 6z X LL W4 O-j z o Of vo w° a a& z� Timberline Logging #1 400618 - north lot i 9 _= D g~w xa6w N (n W W M Q O�Odd ey0b k O h 0 '3[N3= 0 3W =3W Ear hhh22 �hb N W M Pb E-o O WWWW ENO ° 0 Bg7.77' , �b'52oE AD s 13 �.. IAKE.; onl 472• 'RUNE AfE 5oW 4gp NINA , I3 mEY MAW (F 2q o_ 6z X LL W4 O-j z o Of vo w° a a& z� Timberline Logging #1 400618 - north lot Management Plan for Richmond JPJ Property Portions of NW h of SE' /. and SW 'h of NE' /. S18 T40N R06E, W.M. (Tax acct. no.400618 397337) Landowner: Richmond JPJ Enterprises Inc. P.O. Box 2789 Bellingham, WA 98227 Plan Prepared by:Aubrey J. Smrgell Forester, Nielsen Bros. Inc. (360) 671 -9078 Plan Prepared: 11 -3 -02 Landowner Objectives At this time landowner intends to implement long term timber production and wildlife habitat enhancement to be accomplished by tree planting, pre-commercial thinning, and selective timber harvesting while maintaining aesthetic values. Landowner intends to promote the growth of a variety of conifer and hardwood species for the production of harvestable timber, maintenance of wildlife habitat, and promotion of aesthetic values. General Property Description * Property was acquired by owner in 2003. * The subject property area consists of 22.54 acres per attached survey map. This management plan applies to 19.16 acres. * The property has a fish - bearing stream (Maple Creek) and some associated wetlands. Maple Creek is seasonally dry in late summer early fall. * Topography is relatively flat with slopes 0 -5 %. * The majority of the timber on the property was harvested in 2003. Remaining timber is in buffers surrounding Maple Creek and wetlands. Critical areas were protected per the Whatcom County Critical Areas Ordinance and the Department of Natural Resources Forest Practices Code. The harvested portions of the property are scheduled to be replanted with Douglas fir seedlings in early 2004. The remaining timber is approximately 80 years old. This timber is mostly Douglas fir with components of western hemlock, western red cedar, bigleaf maple, and red alder. The property is bounded by private ownerships on all sides with the exception of the north side which is bounded by Whamom County Silver Lake Park. Adjacent land uses include rural forestry, residential, and commercial forestry. Thus landowners objectives are consistent with existing land uses in the area. The property is accessed from Silver Lake Road (Whatcom County Road) and the Black Mountain Road (private road). No portions of the property are being used for grazing, see attached maps for further illustration Forest Health There are currently no significant indicators of forest health problems (insect damage, high fire risk, fungal rots etc..) on the subject property or adjacent properties. No future forest health problems are anticipated within the subject property. Timber and Wood Products There is currently a mix of commercial hardwood and conifer species. These species include: red alder (Alms cobra), bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), black cottonwood (Populus hichocarpa), birch (Bemla sp.), western redmdar (Thuja phcata), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), western hemlock (Tsuga hetemphylla), grand fn (Abies grandis), and silks spruce (Pima sitchensis). With the exception of scattered wildlife trees, the majority of the remaining timber is within critical areas butters. The property is scheduled to be replanted with 2 year old Douglas fn seedlings in early 2004. Soils All soils information is taken from the Whatcom County Soil Survey published by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1998. There are two soil types in the area. These soils include: Bameston gravelly to= 0 -8 % slopes and Shak ar muck. The Shalcar muck is in the swampy, ponded area in the northeast portion of the property. Bameston gravelly loam: Erosion hazard, equipment limitation, and windthrow hazard are slight. Seedling mortality and plant competition is moderate. Thus, seasonal operational restrictions may apply especially when soils are wet. Caution needs to be exercised when selecting equipment for silvicultural operations. Low ground impact ground based or cable systems will be more desirable for harvesting operations. Vegetation management measures may used to be employed to control competing vegetation in newly planted areas. This can be accomplished via chemical or manual means. Planting density may need to be higher in these areas. Site index for this soil for Douglas £v is 150' on a 100 year basis. Timber volume production is rated at 174 cubic feet per acre per year. Suggested trees to plant include Douglas fir, red alder, and western hemlock. Shalcar muck: Erosion hazard is slight. Seedling mortality, plant competition, windthrow, and equipment limitation hazards are severe. '[here is no merchantable timber in this area Also, wetland protection rules require buffering of this area. See the attached tables "Woodland Management and Productiviv/' from the Soil Survey of Whatcom County for reference. Water Quality, Riparian and Wetland Areas There is one stream located within the subject area. This stream (Maple Crock) is fish hearing (trout and largemouth bass) and is protected by a 200' buffer under current regulations. Limited harvesting activity can take place within the 200' buffer only with a conditional use permit There is an open, non - forested wetland in the northemtem portion of the property. Fish and Wildlife Habitat The forest cover currently existing on site as retained for critical areas protections along with the frsh- bearing stream is presently providing quality habitat for a variety of wildlife. Newly harvested areas will provide good feeding habitat for deer and other species. Harvested areas to be replanted in 2004 will provide changing habitat for variety of species as the new forest matures. It is anticipated that the plans and objectives held by the landowner will be consistent with maintaining this quality habitat through selective harvesting over time, appropriate reforestation, and maintaining stream and wetland protection measures. Threatened and Endangered Species and Cultural Resources 'Mere me no known threatened or endangered species present on or relying on the subject property. Future management should have no effect on threatened or endangered species. There me no known cultural issues regarding this property. Management Plans & Timetable Winter /Spring of 2004: Plant approximately 3,500 seedlings in recently harvested areas. Seedlings will be 2 year old Douglas fn. Removal of competing brush to facilitate reforestation. "Chinning, pnming, and brush control to improve stand over time and ensure the survival of young seedlings. Future thinning and pruning will focus on improving the quality and growth of the overall stand. It is anticipated that these areas can be pre- commercially thinned in 2015 -2020. Competing vegetation will be controlled by manual slashing and either left to decay on site or gathered and burned. These areas can be selectively harvested in 35 -40 years by ground based methods. Slash will be left on site or otherwise managed to mitigate any potential fire hazard Harvested areas will be reforested as necessary and appropriate to fully occupy the site. Harvest and management time frames may fluctuate as landowner needs and market changes necessitate. S lE u016uiyseM 'eaiv Rlunoo WOO)C4M A w 6•• 0." 0.1 d ry� rl 30 K m W n% n ni O mi I% 1 qr do m m C G C O nl S ry ry „1 µ W O 71 1„ K o I K33 h O ry O O Jp VO F F ~ q RI OI N I 1 d x n n n I n rbr I I I w 41 ml p 'C V W �o M -- N F N W R R R O ry V b Y n n n o0 u n W n � n < < n3�3n 7 S W W n m Snnq� M Y I Y n — W o 0. � O N �m > m 4 •C Y (1 y n n n Y V I- Y ✓ n n 1D O V m V 5 3 3 3 3 Y £ R y Iwo A ry N „ NS0. � Ynl n Y p Y n n n n m W n W � —i z Y n n n n n n n ]n n I___ ___m OtAEEO _______________________________ £DE EA£o £A£O EmE E'e£ WmW OPW YYW y W 6NY0 mCY N0.uG m6oC uYY u V nqhOH OYOmw Wvm WpOV WMW WM14 O 3 F Sr FMS nM1S FSr 0 V �w0 m m �Iw0.13n di M Iw61n3 Iw6��3n � 0 0 (wi 00 O mil I� I� 010 0 1 1 0 m ✓ Y 11601 d 0 d OI �I dF0 6n0 Y ] IIYF 41% pl %I Y % h % Y 11 m 11 X11 111 1 9 � II 11 111 Ills j 111 IFI F 11111 111 1111 111 11111 111 1111 1111 1 111 e �� 1 IIY 111 11 1110 1 1 A ] 0. I1I 1-- 111— 1 1I— Iw0.n y. O — — — n � (1 n N K tl liw HC 11111 -• Ima Illo Ilo Ilw i K fl _ _ rYSi � OA SY� SY� ron roR w G 3 6•CO O n n w W n 3 P.•C9 O YW 1'W rW Vn W �£M xLM OS OS' S µ r3 WW Wr r3 I4-g M ] F � u016uiyseM 'eaiv Rlunoo WOO)C4M A blr- kak �3 0 i n -o a Ool Y In w0 a30L 0 �nnna 30 r" 6 k a wn£ n'n ui I _np_ w O a �yY %W nM Y40 LE£ uol6uiyseM 'eajy Munop woWeuN' N Y >� Fm GU �a nw F n y N n gWaU,N O R I n v 1 I 0 i 1 I i A A A O S S C P U W o o _ n n _____________________ m < < < q n < < a W ry W W m m U N _____ ~ R O N R ry < < n M1 ------------------------------------------------ 3 3 3 N m 3 0 a a n q 0 O m O 3 S £3'om n3 n g3'mS momnm moamm ro F'£A Wrn A£o °c a'm aoo- °e w' oYa r r 0aq mm rn crtl . rN Ncr aaNa amaa as a mm0 am0 Fm n xw n w Mn m Mn mnM Mq WO„w w 0 Yq mw YW r "r v "✓ o � o� a ba a ; v ."M1w -; O� � Om as M q >u q Y btlY bmOa0m O Mq ua ry uma' C a '0a1 M1n° g M1 M10. ni q S E 03Ya"a 1 C 0� 0oal 1 0.n a 0.c am rm3 'U nm 96. 9P, �a'r n �armF rW am ry " o an W . n3n n 0 m mmi o n n a0M1 n am n amnn 10ani 0 n al 1on al 1 0 0 ai IaI w n F w I I w FYI nFµl XIW "FrX In I" 1111 Illnl IM1I IIt IM1 I 11 II 1111 I II III I III 1 III I 1 1,1 111 II11 II I11Y Il— Ill- II11N 1110 Ill- II11U II11U I111U Illm Ilm lllm Illm 1111q Illla llllm 1111W ___ _______________________ryq____„m A A ___ —____. 'WR NR MR bN R wa OA (wlA neNt (YIN as as as r W r O r W O Y n w O m ry v Y� Y] Y7 c n as as as M1a n n n wq nW p � Y nn M1ry tlI�D ury blr- kak �3 0 i n -o a Ool Y In w0 a30L 0 �nnna 30 r" 6 k a wn£ n'n ui I _np_ w O a �yY %W nM Y40 LE£ uol6uiyseM 'eajy Munop woWeuN' FOREST PRACTICE ACTIVITY MAP TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH HALF 0, RANGE 06 EAST (W.M.) HALF 0, SECTION 18 Application Page I of 1 Tiact A/ Ae%vndkd rPT Please use the legend from the FPA Instruction or prov e a list of symbols used. Monday, November 03, 2883 11:45:58 AM NAD 83 Contour Interval: 40 Feel 0NI S088 N3Sl3IN :lo leenbey MM Rjuno3 Wooleyp 00'EGS tlll Wd 12!21E002/22/0I 0 10 f :e0ed hZSS00lfi0d 1N01N� .M ntf3 N13� ° m z a 3y 3 qe 3 vo p 3 3 Zy 9 /a ` Otl n oz � N� ri V)1 O nm m 0 _y m�z P m 20 N 22 yyN 1n yb ?N5Nw R zNH may n a ° CEN1 r C�.^^ 88888 �A.i Y ,cy Yom 0 l�cycT9jN N� 'Pq�9o90 fr1 � Y N O N N m�8 1 WI 1 M.6o. Q 1 Na v "'� � mmvmuawN� A y Z voU O 222baWH22 m N � O D C2 88 b a(bp�N$00NbWW � ^1 �0000U�NN p 2 Z 2 N p !yO,ry � OiTTniA ^iTEF n S 2 n 2 W Y �N QAryLGOWRN� n O1� +1 N8 0 �o H N H O m j Ny Snny A rr2 w> 2 2 WON e N W zR act z Z i °Ny N ? p c9,) E CREEK ? z n H O mw H n —'p 1 Q 1 Na v "'� � mmvmuawN� A y Z voU O 222baWH22 m N � O D C2 88 b a(bp�N$00NbWW � ^1 �0000U�NN p 2 Z 2 N p !yO,ry � OiTTniA ^iTEF n S 2 n 2 W Y �N QAryLGOWRN� n O1� +1 N8 0 �o H N H O m j Ny Snny A rr2 w> 2 2 WON e N W zR act z Z I y xnR i f y � Y �X R ..k sj �: c4 t :.[ lit 3i G,� t IFS -Y . AI IV °} e t d '+ a +�fi ei i r i }. - >t 91 91 1 Ir :? EXHIBIT "A" Description of Tract At (Northerly Portion of Parcel No 400618 397/337) A tract of land in Section 18, Township 40 North, Range 6 East of W.M., described as follows: Beginning at a point 228 feet East of the North and South centerline of Section 18, Township 40 North, Range 6 East of W.M., and 1320 feet South of the North line of said Section; thence South 88e 59'27" East parallel with the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 18 a distance of 1883.73 feet to a point 30 feet West of the Lake Branch of the A.W. Knight Logging Company's Railroad, now know as Black Mountain Road; thence Southwesterly along a line parallel to and 30 feet distant Northwesterly from the center line of said branch railroad a distance of 599.38 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as °Point A" for the easement description below; thence South 87e 28' 39" West a distance of 883.57 feet to the centerline of Maple Creek; thence North 88e 59' 27" West a distance of 592.36 feet to a point 30 feet East at right angles from the center of the .Main. Line of the A.W. Knight Logging Company's Road, now known as Silver Lake Road; thence Northwesterly and 30 feet distant Northeasterly from the center of said main road or line a distance of 600.47 feet to point of beginning, less County Road. TOGETHER with an easement for ingress, egress and utilities, over, under and across a portion of the South half of the Northeast quarter of said Section 18, said easement being described as follows: Commencing at the above described "Point A"; thence South 87° 28' 39" West a distance of 130.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 02° 31'21" East a distance of 50.00 feet; thence South 870 28' 39" West a distance of 400.00 feet; thence North 020 31' 21" West a distance of 50.00 feet to the South line of the tract described above; thence North 87e 28' 39" East along said South line a distance of 400.00 feet to the point of beginning of this easement description. A map depicting this description and this easement are shown on Exhibit "B ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Further subject to and together with all easements, covenants, restrictions and /or agreements of record or otherwise. 2031005574 Page: 3 of 4 10/221200312+21 PN LLH Si3.e0 NNelcam ComtL, N0 Request of: NIELSEN BRCS INC Timberline Logging #2 OST 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY OPENSPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Timberline Logging Designation: Open Space Timber P.O. Box 2789 Transfer from Designated Forest Bellingham, WA 98227 Parcel No.: 400618 - 397337 southerly pin. Subarea: Foothills Parcel Acreage: 19.79 acres Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Forestry Acreage in OST: 18.50 acres Zoning Desig.: RF Road Access: 8500 blk. Silver Lake Road Shorelines: N/A Land Use: Forested land. Land Use History: Timber land. Soil Type /Capabilities: #6 - Barneston gravelly loam, 0 - 8% slopes, 100% lot coverage Site Index* 118 - Douglas fir Limitations/Concems: Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness. Seedling mortality and establishment, competing vegetation. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0= incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 Majority of timber harvested in 200213. Douglas fir, Western red cedar, hemlock, red alder and big/eaf maple within buffer areas of Maple Creek (anadromous fish bearing stream). Soils Description 2 Typical woodland soil units. Forest Health 2 Forest health meets WAC 222 -34 -010(2) requiremis, no future forest health problems are anticipated within property. Harvest Plan 2 Majority of timber harvested in 2003, remaining timber is +/- 80 years old wfin buffered areas. Thinning Program 2 Management control by thinning, pruning and brush control of invasive species. Planting /Restocking Program 2 Winter /Spring of 2004: planting of +/- 3,500 - 2 year old Douglas fir seedlings, +/- 165 per acre. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 Tall stumps and buffered stream areas provides quality habitat for wildlife. TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval `Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. }( }k o& « �N \ w/ 2© Q`\ q }§ / §\ , )w� t772/ \� \� \ &a d-d :� o �w «y \( (SW > / a / 0 4 ©�o G ®� ° - �a «S 22 2A ,�o!¥0 Timberline L mgmg# 40618 -south e! § § & ° \ ef|� (�k~ \ 2 §§ }( }k o& « �N \ w/ 2© Q`\ q }§ / §\ , )w� t772/ \� \� \ &a d-d :� o �w «y \( (SW > / a / 0 4 ©�o G ®� ° - �a «S 22 2A ,�o!¥0 Timberline L mgmg# 40618 -south e! Management Plan for Timberline Logging Property Portions of NW '/4 of SE' /. and SW '/. of NE' /. S18 T40N RO6E, W.M. (Tax acct. no.400618 397337) Landowner: Timberline Logging Inc. P.O. Box 2789 Bellingham, WA 98227 Plan Prepared by:Aubmy 1. Stargell Forester, Nielsen Bros. Inc. (360) 671 -9078 Plan Prepared: 11 -3 -02 Landowner Objectives At this time landowner intends to implement long term timber production and wildlife habitat enhancement to be accomplished by tree planting, pre - commercial thinning, and selective timber harvesting while maintaining aesthetic values. Landowner intends to promote the growth of a variety of conifer and hardwood species for the production of harvestable timber, maintenance of wildlife habitat, and promotion of aesthetic values. General Property Description * Property was acquired by owner in 2003. ` The subject property area consists of 20.50 acres per attached survey map. This management plan applies in 19.21 acres. There is an existing house and outbuildings on the parcel. ' The property has a fish- bearing stream (Maple Creek) and some associated wetlands. Maple Creek is seasonally dry in late summer early fall. • Topography is relatively flat with slopes 0 -5 %. The majority of the timber on the property was harvested in 2003. Remaining timber is in buffers surrounding Maple Creek. Critical areas were protected per the Whatcom County Critical Areas Ordinance and the Department of Natural Resources Forest Practices Code. The harvested portions of the property are scheduled to be replanted with Douglas fir seedlings in early 2004. The remaining timber is approximately 80 years old. This timber is mostly Douglas fn with components of westem hemlock, western red cedar, bigleaf maple, and red alder. The property is bounded by private ownerships on all sides with the exception of the north side which is bounded by Whatcom County Silver Lake Park. Adjacent land uses include coral forestry, residential, and commercial forestry. Thus landowners objectives are consistent with existing land uses in the area. The property is accessed from Silver Lake Road (Whatcom County Road) and the Black Mountain Road (private road). No portions of the property are being used for grazing. see attached maps for further illustration Forest Health There are currently no significant indicators of forest health problems (insect damage, high fire risk fungal rots etc..) on the subject property or adjacent properties. No fumre forest health problems are anticipated within the subject property. Timber and Wood Products There is currently a mix of commercial hardwood and conifer species. These species include: red alder (Alms rubm), bigleaf maple (Ater macrophyllum), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), birch (Benda sp.), western recicedar (Thula plicata), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesn), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), grand far (Abies grandis), and sitka sprnce (Picea sitchensis). With the exception of scattered wildlife trees, the majority of the remaining timber is within critical areas buffers. The property is scheduled to be replanted with 2 year old Douglas fn seedlings in early 2004. Soils All soils information is taken from the Whatcom County Soil Survey published by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1998. The soil type in the area is: Barneston gravelly loam 0 -8 % slopes. Bameston gravelly loam: Erosion hazard, equipment limitation, and windthrow hazard are slight. Seedling mortality and plant competition is moderate. Thus, seasonal operational restrictions may apply especially when soils are wet. Caution needs to be exercised when selecting equipment for silvicultmal operations. Low ground impact ground based or cable systems will be more desirable for harvesting operations. Vegetation management measures may need to be employed to control competing vegetation in newly planted areas. This can be accomplished via chemical or manual means. Planting density may need to be higher in these areas. Site index for this soil for Douglas fit is 150' on a 100 year basis. Timber volume production is rated at 174 cubic feet per acre per year. Suggested trees to plant include Douglas fir, red alder, and western hemlock. See the attached tables "Woodland Management and Productivity" from the Soil Survey of Whatcom County for reference. Water Quality, Riparian and Wetland Areas There is one stream located within the subject area. This stream (Maple Creek) is fish bearing (trout and largemouth bass) and is protected by a 200' buffer under current regulations. Limited harvesting activity can take place within the 200' buffer only with a conditional use permit. Fish and Wildlife Habitat The forest cover currently existing on site as retained for critical areas protections along with the fish - bearing stream is presently providing quality habitat for a variety of wildlife. Newly harvested areas will provide good feeding habitat for deer and other species. Harvested areas to be replanted in 2004 will provide changing habitat for variety of species as the new forest matures. It is anticipated that the plans and objectives held by the landowner will be consistent with maintaining this quality habitat through selective barvesting over time, appropriate reforestation, and maintaining stream and wetland protection measures. Threatened and Endangered Species and Cultural Resources There are no known threatened of endangered species present on or relying on the subject property. Future management should have no effect on threatened or endangered species. There are no (mown cultural issues regarding this property. Management Plans & Timetable Winter /Spring of 2004: Plant approximately 3,500 seedlings in recently harvested areas. Seedlings will be 2 year old Douglas fin. Removal of competing brush to facilitate reforestation. Thinning, pruning, and brush control to improve stand over time and ensure the survival of young seedlings. Future thinning and pruning will focus on improving the quality and growth of the overall stand It is anticipated that these areas can be pre-commercially thinned in 2015 -2020. Competing vegetation will be controlled by manual slashing and either left to decay on site or gathered and burned. These areas can be selectively harvested in 3540 years by ground based methods. Slash will be left on site or otherwise managed to mitigate any potential fine hazard. Harvested areas will be reforested as necessary and appropriate to fully occupy the site. Harvest and management time fmmes may fluctuate as landowner needs and market changes necessitate. ___________ _______________________________ om aP0 as o° ron ro£ rom A bNil A W e n 3 d10 3 6n O rt P4 vW0 a w OryY nV p N !1 r I % 0... r 1 X F O O W 30 W✓ n O O O 1 ✓3 O O 1 9 V RM1 <o <o 00 9 ' ]R n% • a a a O o ]m O n p O 0 0 01 33 0 c n1 0 66 p O S > .nTl 0b n I 1 1 1 1 D "n O O 1 p v0 M N N N Y W O M O R O O 0 M "m a0 rt n n n n d o v ____________ _______________________________ a n n N < < m < < na 3p yC n S ry n M1 O h> 1� ' rt O W 0 W W O g M 9 I w 1 , 3 3 3p N O 03 6 0. d 6 nW S > n K Y Y Y n n P V M P O R _ 3 3 3 3 _~W O S £ 6 d 6 6 d V rt W W W P 0Sa a VM1 rt N M 6 N n01 1 6L P W n W W 3 N ro 3O S S OPT 0 n P O O p O 0 --------------------------------------- NNa £00 a0 m000 OAWN 0pa Aron �6ab0 M0 pa u0 0am0 m0a a 0 m ..m '1 rt�O.- mYmnm nw mi° mn 40 >00 n 0mo0 q 0m 000 000 3 Pa. 3 3M M- ° p i m m IM- a I n i m✓ m" m .M- m a° V I d 0 a 1 6 1m 6 Fµ' V I 0 v a v 1 I1 < r (1 < v 0 1 I a OI I a I OI a 0 0 WWO Wn0 an 1601 6i0 4101 610i 6n0 0.n0 R I IIVFI 41F VIXI VIFI W F W X W I I n 1 1 M M M1 M b I11 IFI 1 111 I 11 I I —1 IIIIV 111✓ 1110 1 1 1 ] r 11m an IIII- lum 111 111 11m 11m nP I — I 11 w <ro it 1 11 iii.• i iir wn 1ii1F. 1ma 1110 1110 111.1 IIW rtc ___________ _______________________________ om aP0 as o° ron ro£ i P F•i W e n 3 d10 3 6n O rt P4 vW0 w OryY nV p N !1 X F O O W W✓ YW n3 ✓3 ✓3 RM1 <o <o 00 9 ' ]R n% • a a a O K w" rna go i o- SL6 uolbulgSUM laaJV NunOD wooleW F— -,o .m F mgu nuns um rrn msuuaion or provide a ust of symbols used. Page 1 of 1 FOREST PRACTICE ACTIVITY MAP TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH HALF 0, RANGE 06 EAST (W.M.) HALF 0, SECTION 18 %rerc f RZ L�,1nj Monday. November 03, 2003 11 A5:50 AM MD 83 Contour Interval: 40 Feet f2 z i i Sti u� F <Mo OW <W Z5 dal < O �4 z u v w� 0 Nm z� N M Q 0 a M W W W V001.OM0V0 � M°� W 0000�0vi4NV� ry� p U` W ti NN�']P1NNpNb 44 ZC O IL b h 2 � W _ 33W W:�W OWO OOW pWp O ni ei O i 2 2 p U hhcmi.^biNh000 � m. W 3 C Q h�hNroONQb m `x Wm mmo-M� � 8g h N 2 22bmmb222 Q h0 � W j JJJJJJJ mJ� � N U j UU U E4 x g �N3� o ,3 Wm3m3W .`� 0 = AWh NA h m�m�m d w J m8� Eaw ymm22 �O� N WWWWW C5 J aMao pU O WWWWW ENO U (J 2 � 897.P• r IR s f�2 E \-AKE ROR�' �_ NTER\. \NE �N1G1it LOGGING RAG. x—N j3I5W 4N Mc0 MAIM -ME A'N. O a wo m o ?' a wz X LL wa 03 Z o op Z � 2031005574 Page < of a 101221200312.21 PM LLP $73.00 WLatcem county WP Bequest of! NIELSEN BBOS INC OHO 1 l rc CK� Q N3110 3' a y h m N � U M W W W V001.OM0V0 � M°� W 0000�0vi4NV� ry� p U` W ti NN�']P1NNpNb 44 ZC O IL b h 2 � W _ 33W W:�W OWO OOW pWp O ni ei O i 2 2 p U hhcmi.^biNh000 � m. W 3 C Q h�hNroONQb m `x Wm mmo-M� � 8g h N 2 22bmmb222 Q h0 � W j JJJJJJJ mJ� � N U j UU U E4 x g �N3� o ,3 Wm3m3W .`� 0 = AWh NA h m�m�m d w J m8� Eaw ymm22 �O� N WWWWW C5 J aMao pU O WWWWW ENO U (J 2 � 897.P• r IR s f�2 E \-AKE ROR�' �_ NTER\. \NE �N1G1it LOGGING RAG. x—N j3I5W 4N Mc0 MAIM -ME A'N. O a wo m o ?' a wz X LL wa 03 Z o op Z � 2031005574 Page < of a 101221200312.21 PM LLP $73.00 WLatcem county WP Bequest of! NIELSEN BBOS INC i �h � {� {V f'1 g,f ry t� 1 i =f ;; 1 i t' 1 t' EXHIBIT "All Description of Tract A2 (Southerly Portion of Parcel'No 400618 397/337) A tract of land in Section 18, Township 40 North, Range 6 East of W.M., described as follows: Commencing at a point 228 feet East of the North and South centerline of Section 18, Township 40 North, Range 6 East of W,M., and 1320 feet South of the North line of said Section; thence South 880 59' 27' East parallel with the North line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 18 a distance of 1883.73 feet to a point 30 feet West of the Lake Branch of the A.W. Knight Logging Company's Railroad, now know as Black Mountain Road, thence Southwesterly along a line parallel to and 30 feet distant Northwesterly from the center line of said branch railroad a distance of 599.38 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as 'Point Am, said point being the true point of beginning of this tract description and also for the easement description below; thence South 870 28'39" West a distance of 883.57 feet to the oentedine of Maple Creek; thence North 880 59' 27" West a distance of 592.36 feel to a point 30 feet East at right angles from the center of the Main Line of the A.W. Knight Logging Company's Road, now known as Silver Lake Road; thence Southeasterly and 30 feet distant Northeasterly from the center of said main road or line to its intersection with a point 30 feet West of the Lake Branch of the A.W. Knight Logging Company's Railroad, now know as Black Mountain Road; thence Northwesterly along a line parallel to and 30 feet distant Northwesterly from the center line of said branch railroad to "Point A" and the true point of beginning, LESS County Road. ALSO LESS the following described parcel: Beginning at the intersection of the Easterly line of County Road No. 265 (also known as the Main Line of the AW. Knight Logging Company's Road) and the Westerly line of the Lake Branch of the A.W. Knight Logging Company's Railroad right of way (now known as Black Mountain Road); thence Northeasterly along said Westerly line a distance of 330 feet; thence Westerly parallel with the North line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 18 a distance of 250 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of said County Road; thence Southeriy along said Easterly line of said county to the point of beginning. SUBJECT to an easement for ingress, egress and utilities, over, under and across a portion of the South half of the Northeast quarter of said Section 18, said easement being described as follows: Commencing at the above described •Point A"; thence South 870 28'398 West a distance of 130.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 020 31'21" East a distance of 50.00 feet; thence South 870 28' 39" West a distance of 400.00 feet; thence North 02° 31' 21' West a distance of 50.00 feet to the South line of the tract described above; thence North 870 28' 39" East along said South line a distance of 400.00 feet to the point of beginning of this easement description. A map depicting this description and this easement are shown on Exhibit *B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Further subject to and together with all easements, covenants, restrictions and /or agreements of record or otherwise. 2031005573 Pegs: 3 of 4 10/22/20031221 PM LL5 $73.00 uholoom comtw. w Request of: NIELSEN BROS INO Current Stand Description 2 Grossman OST 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY OPENSPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: David Grossman Designation: Open Space Timber 12332A 14th Avenue NE Transfer from Designated Forest Seattle WA 98125 Parcel No.: 400507 - 5493559 400508 - 012327, to increase overall forest health and reduce fire danger. 400508 - 029353, - 058361. Subarea: Foothills Parcel Acreage: 16.22 acres Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Forestry Acreage in OST: 16.22 acres Zoning Desig.: RF Road Access: 5300 blk Reese Hill Road Shorelines: N/A Land Use: Forested land. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Land Use History: Timber land. Soil Type /Capabilities: . #17 - Blethen gravelly loam, 5 -15 %slopes, 50 %lot coverage Site Index* 115 - Douglas fir #18- Blethen gravelly loam, 15 -30 %shapes, 50% lot coverage Sitelndex* 115 - Douglasfir Limitations/Concems: Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness. Seedling mortality and establishment, competing vegetation. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0-incomplete; 1= satisfactory, 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 Majority of timber is mature and older. Mixture of Douglas fir, hemlock, birch, red alder, wild cherry and bigleaf maple. Healthy mixture of conifers starting to dominate canopy. Soils Description 2 Typical woodland soil units. Forest Health 2 Selective deaning up and removal of hanging windfalls, diseased trees and dead wood to increase overall forest health and reduce fire danger. Harvest Plan 2 Selectively remove older deciduous trees. Thinning Program 2 Management control by thinning, pruning and brush control of invasive species. Planting/Restocking Program 2 Either replant with appropriate species or allow natural succession dependent on the site conditions- Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 Goal is to maintain a healthy diverse forest providing quality habitat for wildlife. TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval `Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. Grossman OST 400507 and 400508 Timber Management Plan Assessors Parcel #s 400508 012327 0000, 400507 549355 0000, 400508 058361 0000, 400508 029353 0000 Purchased Sept. 2003 Owner: David Grossman The subject property is on the south face of Vedder Mt. There is an elevation gain of 200 feet from south to north.There is one significant and one smaller ravine that cross the property that hold seasonal streams. An existing functional roadbed meanders the property from Reese Hill Road to the north property line. Two dilapidated structures will be removed. This 50-60 year old forest is primarily mixed second growth that appears to have grown in natural succession with the most mature species being deciduous Western Maple, Birch, Alder and Wild Cherry. There is a healthy mix of conifers starting to dominate the canopy. New growth is limited by density and canopy. I will be using.the 'Natural Selection Forest Management " system with the goals of maintaining a healthy, diverse forest while enhancing the wildlife habitat. The forest has lacked management for many years so initial efforts will involve the removal of hanging windfall, diseased trees and smaller dead wood to increase overall health and reduce fire danger. Standing dead trees will be left as habitat. It will soon be appropriate to selectively remove older deciducs trees and some unstable conifers. Activity in the steep ravines bordering seasonal streams will be kept to a minimum. Larger logs will be used in the most appropriate manner dependant on species, size, quality and market conditions Options include: 1)Delivering logs to a local mill 2)Delivering them to outside markets. 3)Having the logs milled on site. 4)Fire wood Smaller branches and leaves will be reduced and left on the forest floor to enrich the soil. In the event that the canopy is opened up sufficiently to allow new growth, I will either replant with appropriate species or allow natural succession depending on the site conditions. The land will net be used for grazing. If you require more information please don't hesitate to contact me. PF.z ���lVY6�,.� 7339Z7� 16 ACRES WITH TIMBER AND SOO THE RN EXPOSURE j' ii ii l� 1� 5.7 Acres �i i Ii 5.4 Acres 5.1 Acres DI[HPiyp t gTS"'rr�,s -ro Rell Ra. Walker and Clark OST 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: J.C. Walker Jr/Laura Clark Designation: Open Space Timber 6066 Williams Lake Rd. Transfer from Designated Forest Deming, WA 98244 Parcel No.: 380509 - 030460 Subarea: South Fork Valley Parcel Acreage: 20 acres Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Forestry Acreage in DST: approx 7 acres Zoning Desig.: RF Road Access: 6066 Williams Lake Road Shorelines: NIA Land Use: Homesite, lake/wetlands, forest land. Land Use History Timber land. Soil Type/Capabilities: #28 - Chuckanu6Shalcar complex, 0 -15% slopes, 100% lot coverap Site Index* 130 - Douglas fir Limitations/Concem Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness on Chuckanut soil, pending of Shalcar soil, hummocky topogmhy. Seedling mortality and establishment, hazard of windthrow, competing vegetation. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0= incomplete; I= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 80% 2nd growth alder, 15% Douglas fir, remainder Western red cedar, hemlock, cottonwood. Toss Cr. and Williams Lake anadromous fish bearing waters. Soils Description - Applicant's input negligible. Poor woodland soil units due to pending, high water table. Forest Health 2 Competing vegetation not maintained except near access road. No major insect orpest problems. Harvest Plan Previously logged in the 40s. No plan for the future. Thinning Program N/A Planting /Restocking Program N/A Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Primarily by leaving alone. TOTAL: 6 14 RECOMMENDATION: DENIAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval 'Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. Forest Land Management Plan For 6066 Williams Lake Road, Deming, WA 98244 Presented by Matthew & Roberta Miller, Landowners and Laura Clark & J.C. Walker, Jr., Landowners as of October 1, 2003 September 2003 Goals and Objectives The property located at 6066 Williams Lake Road in Deming, WA consists of 19 forested saes, including some forested wetlands and an open site for primary residence and outbuildings. Current property owners intend to maintain the ime" of the forest and wet areas as a unique partner in the lake ecosystem. The owner's objective is to preserve this special wildlife habitat by introducing as little foreign or unnatural elements to the property. The goal is to make as little impact as possible to the natural environmenL This can be achieved primarily by leaving most of the land areas undisturbed and in natural habitat form. Landowner: Matt & Roberta Miller 2920 Elm St. Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 734 -3289 Property: Parcel#: 380509 030460 20 acres total 19 acres to be placed in Open Space Tunber located at 6066 Williams Lake Road, Deming, WA current landowners acquired property in 1998 current land use: private residence currently classified as "forest land" land use history. same as above. Logged in 1940s surrounding land use: recreational land in trust covenant Objectives: See Forest Land Management Plan Current Stand Description: 80% alder, 15% Douglas Fir, 5% miscellaneous Pacific Northwest conifer and deciduous, namely Cedar, Headock, Spruce, and Cottonwood. All are 2nd & 3'd growth. The entire property was clear -tut in the 1940s. Soils Description: See provided charts Forest Health: Fire protection: the forest is rather dense with interspersed major wetlands Competing vegetation: native vegetation, not maintained except near roads Windfalls: described in Forest Land Management Plan Insects/Diseases: no major insect or pest problems have been noted that would affect the forest health Thinning Program: N/A Planting/Restocking Program: N/A at this time. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement: primarily by leaving alone. See Forest Land Management Plan AREA A consists primarily of wetlands. It is really an extension of Williams Lake, with an island in the northeast comer of property line. There are alder trees with some fu. This area needs to be managed very carefully. Minimal or no building in the surrounding area and no tree removal would be ideal. Windfalls will be left for the wildti& owners do not intend to clear brush, in order that there may be safe shore havens for wildlife. AREA B forest ,. is a mix of wetland and 3m Douglas .. ... :. e .��e.. .a . . ' . 014001448% NAW WON iuw uu:r .a r �a . e. :.. . u: I lit, 1 �i AREA C represents the most dense forest on the said property. Coveting roughly ten aces, approximately 80'/0 of the trees are 2vd growth alder, perhaps 15' /o P growth Douglas. Fir, the remaining being a mix of 2o'& 3'd growth Pacific Northwest conifers and deciduous trees of various heights. There is a substantial size marsh, perhaps 3 acres in size. This marsh is where the outflow for Williams I.akeis located and becomes the beginning of Toss Creek, which eventually flows west to the Nooksack River. This area also contains the primary home site with an adjoining 2 -3 acre clearing to the west. Management needs in this area would: be atender balance of leaving the marsh and creek undisturbed while keeping access roads in good repair as well as dealing with potential danger windfall trees, the aging .(45 +years) cottonwoods in particular. Summary of Stand Treatments Planned (by Area) AREA A: Treatment. of Area A will be delicate. No building or timber harvesting of any type is planned for this area. To its advantage, the area is not easily accessible due to windfalls on both east and west sides of the island. Since this area is so remote and rarely, if ever, visited by humans, it represents a wildlife mecca There is verifiable evidence of beaver habitat and constant Croat Him Heron activity in addition to being a haven for various other Pacific Northwest wildlife. Again, the: owners intend to leave this area unmolested in order to ensure this wildlife habitat remains in its most natural state. AREA B: Along the eastern property line (which is western shoreline of Williams Lake) grow native reeds and grasses essential for the protection -of native wildlife. The owner's plan for this area consists of maintaining that native growth. Owners have planted several fir trees and a willow tree in proximity to the water's edge. In the future, we would like to build a low- impact floating dock to access the rowboat. This would lessen the inevitable trampling of bank grasses that occurs as we pull the boat onto land. Outflow of Williams Iake is located in the southwest core of the lake (southeast comer of said property boundaries). Beaver activity at the outflow is seldom. All effort is made to keep the channel free of debris, especially to immunize flooding and encourage salmon activity if there were to be firture spawning from the adjoining Nooksack River to the west. There is currently no spawning and, to our knowledge, only lake trout in Williams Lake. The outflow runs directly into a marsh, which marks the beginning of Toss Creek. AREA C: This area contains the largest concentration on the property of conifers and dense forest, including approximately 80% undergrowth alder trees. There are a. few 2nd or 3id growth cottonwood trees, which may present a windfall danger within the next 15 years or so. If removal becomes necessary, owner win work with an arborist to determine what re- stocking method to use. Toss Creek runs year-round as Williams Lake outflow. Heron are seen almost daily, predominantly in the shallow marsh-to-creek zone. Black bear have also been spotted in Toss Creek. Access road to primary dwelling crosses Toss Creek The crossing consists of a 3'4' diameter culvert covered with 12 °-16" roadbed material. The culvert is adequate for the water flow, even during the peak flow seasons and during rain seasons. In April 2003, Whatcom County Public Works performed an inventory of this culvert and surrounding creek area as part of a county-wide effort to identify common fish, primarily salmon, barriers. At this point, it is unclear if their intention is to take on Toss Creek as a potential project for salmon enhancement. Throughout the year, there can be a fair amount of windfall. Depending on their location (close proximity to or obstructing the road), the owner intends to utilize these limbs and/or trees as recreational firewood. Otherwise, the majority will be left on the forest ground, some of it, no doubt, seized by beavers. The 2 -3 acre clearing dmectly behind the house shall be mowed periodically to keep alder whips down. Owners possibly intend to use this field for future poultry raising. In 1999, the conifers standing near the house and above- mentioned field, were trimmed by a professional arbonst. Rather than have the trees topped, the owners elected to cut out a select few "danger limbs" according to general wind direction. Only organic fertilizershave ever been used or will be used in the maintenance of the recreational lawn. No pesticides have been applied or intend to be, anywhere on the Property . Owners prefer natural pest resistance methods whenever possible. In addition, we only use phosphate -free detergents to minimize the impact on the watershed. The septic tank has recently been pumped (April 2003), Wildfire Habitat: Most Pacific Northwest wildlife thrive within this 20 -acre property. To name a few sighted species: Bald. Engle, Belted Kingfisher, Blue Grouse, ButHebead, Canada Goose, Great Blue Heron, Horned. Grebe, Mallard, Red- winged Blackbird, Tree Swallow, Trumpeter Swan, Wood Duck, Bullfrog, Common Garter Snake, Beaver, Brown Bear, signs of Cougar, Deer, Wink, Northern River Otter, Pacific Shrew, and Raccoon. The owners consider it an honor to five in such close proximity to raw nature. As such, they intend to continue making every effort to ensure a quiet environment (e.g., firecrackers/fireworks are never used on the premises). Any fishing practiced on the lake is catch- and - release. No fishing or crawfishing is done either in the marsh or in Toss Creek. Owners have planted a select few perennials which attract bees, butterflies, as well as birds. Bats are plemifid and mosquitoes are not generally a nuisance. Overall, this habitat is ideal for most Pacific Northwest and lake - dwelling animals. The landowners cherish this fact and will do everything within their reasonable power to foster this environment. Environmental Concerns William Lake I and of I el e r We • one • e l' i%* e'• the it is virtually their knowledge, there has not been a" Owners e to builg a low-impact floating dock to wIron ' trampling shordine herbs and weOdS that stabilize the batik. There handful II l •dozen) growth r• el er : .:r . w le' property Within Y�e or se it may benalicial to periodically rommte e' er - a 1 Y ., T"IsITIng n! this . be eel • et !t eel' a elcounty. . e er At timesWITV4 owners L. People a trespassing e illegally e' maple moss re this e r eu I• +e.. we havOnd r � Lr: a eA a ner I:r :li ee I e' M Wtl I•e Summary Soils Productivity Information See attached fax provided by SA Newman, Forest Engineers, Inc. Everett, WA 98206 '1 : 5ANEWMFW1WA FAX N0. : 42525B4435 `-eP. ?? 2083 03:59PM PS V9Wafion, Tlmber Cruising, and Markermg Services Fstabtished 1946 S.A. NEWMAN, FOREST ENGINEERS, INC. 3216 Wetmore Avenue Phone: 425 259.4411 P.O. Box 156 Fax: 425 258.4435 Everett, WA 98206 -0156 E -mail: sanewman @gte.net ..• yr :::AS u Date: Sept 25, 2003 Fax no. 360 -592 -9222 Please deliver to: Name Ms. Roberta Miller Firm City /State Bellingham, wA 98225 From: Timothy D. Newman, MAX, CF T A .Newman firm Number of pages, including this page: A confirming copy will will not ✓ be sent. The information contained in this facsimile message is confidential and intend- ed only for the use of the person or entity named above. Message: Dear Ms. Miller: At your phone request today, a copy of the Washington State Department of Natural Resources' "productivity - operability overlay" for your property and vicinity is enclosed. The subject" arrow pinpoints the west boundary. You might, however, need to adjust the east boundary based on any land survey or other reputed data. A legend and other detail which explain the map codes (4 pages] are also enclosed, Please call me at the number above if you have any ques- tions, Thank you, C.IIACXew .— Eoxma \u.aoc SEP -25 -2010 SAT 09:19PM ID:Nooksack Business Core. - Wamn. Kni,,. 0� .l M : SghJWNF]RMR FRK N0. 4252584435 Sep. 25 2003 04:00PM F Tt IX 4'f ;Tn Township 38-North, Range 5 East, W V tiK *AT Subject Dnas -2 / 58 DF125 -3 / 1 � 72 - pf125 -2 77 DF107-4 105 Df 120-I 40 Df1o6 -2 DFl5235 J 13 _ I. DnQT -4 .. { let I DFlOS -z 29 !/ 1 4 � t 'p . . { { DFi06 -3. - f113 -4 IOD - { WN107 2 ZY 4 SEP -25 -2010 SRT 09 2081 ID Nooksack Business Corp. Waune Kolar PPGE:2 '^1 S(kE.RIFhFIFCW FAX NO. 4252SB4435 Sep. 25 2803 04:00PM P3 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PLACING YOUR LAND INTO PRODUCTIVITY GRADES Locate your property on the overlay. One or more produ within your property lines. correlated to the different on your land. Your ratings example below: productivity - operability ctivity ratings will be These ratings are kinds of soil you have will look similar to the Species Site Index Operability class Acres �T\ 2C ,(/3 2-3 -------- »F :2C -3" 223 The productivity-operability overlay legend on the left of the overlay will identify your species. Use the species and site index to place your land into a grade. In the example above, it is DF12D. You will find a table showing the species, site index and pro- ductivity grade on the back of this sheet. Locate your site index under the appropriate species and find the productivity grade on the far right. Refer to the productivity - operability overlay to identify Your operability class. Operability indicates how well the soil will.handle equipment during logging operations. Operability does not affect which grade your land will be placed into, however, it does affect the valuation within each grade. Map acres show the quantity of land for every productivity rating within each section. It will help in finding the number of acres of each grade within your property lines. SEP -25 -2010 SAT 09:2OPM IO:Nooksack Business Corp. - Waune Kolar ppr.!7 .- FT`21�1 : S*SMl'FIRM M N 550.000 FWC NO. : 4252584435 Sep 25 2803 04:01PM P4 FIGUAE 9-1 Productivity- Oporability overlay Prepared for the FWP DF120—I OF 120-3 27 27 DF120-2 { DF 120 -3 °� DF120 -1 I 712 DF 0 DF 120-2 DFDF120 -2 4 - IpF '.5 —2 / DF 115-2 2 > I { I _J D P I15-333 rl Dr 120 -,1 DF115 -2j r sSC.cDc LEGEND Species Operability Class. OF Douglas -fir Class 1 Favorable WH Western Hemlock Class 2 Average RC Red Cedar Class 3 Difficult RA Red Alder Class 4 Extreme PP Ponderosa Pine WE Western Larch NC NonXommercial EXAMPLE Species Site Index Operability Class Acres �-- >! 5 2._ -____� r' G 79 t 5400 4000 SCALE 1:12000 SEP -25 -2010 SAT 09:21PM ID:Nooksack Business Corp. - Wayne Kolar PAGF:4 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PLACING YOUR LAND INTO PRODUCTIVITY GRADES WESTERN WASHINGTON CONDITIONS Locate your property on the overlay. One or more produ within your property lines. correlated to the different on your land. Your ratings example below: -- productivity - operability -tivity ratings will be These ratings are kinds of soil you have will look similar to the Species Site Index Operability Class Acres pF � 12C �3 223 DF12'. 223 3 The productivity- operability overlay legend on the left of the overlay will identify your species. Use the species and site index to place your land into a grade. In the example above, it is DF120. You will find a table showing the species, site index and pro- ductivity grade on the back of this sheet. Locate your site index under the appropriate species and find the productivity grade on the far right. Refer to the productivity - operability overlay to identify your Operability class. Operability indicates how well the soil will handle equipment during logging operations. Operability does not affect which grade your land will be placed into„ however, it does affect the valuation within each grade. Map acres show the quantity of land for every productivity rating within each section- It will help in finding the number of acres of each grade within your property lines. Productivity grades may be modified by the Department of Revenue for the purpose of determining values assigned by the county assessor. SEP -25 -2010 SAT 09:2113M ID:Nooksack Business Corp. - Waune Kolar PAGE:5 FROM.: SA EldVWIRMA FAX N0. : 4252504435 Sep. 25 2003 04:02pM p6 DETER*IINATION OF OPERABILITY CLASSES Operability classes will be established primarily in terms of the Intrinsic characteristics of soils and geomorphic features. The criteria for each operability class are defined in general terms that apply to the entire state. The state-wide criteria will serve as a guide for develop- ing specific criteria for operability classes within each project area. The specific criteria for each project area will be based on terrain analy- sis; that is, documentation of soil properties, geomorphic features and percent slope. More specifically, terrain analysis includes observations of the following land' surface features and their behavior under forest operations: landforms, rates and modes of soil erosion, properties of soils, regolitb and bedrock. Operability Classes Class 1 (Favorable) This operability class consists of stable soils that slope less than 30 percent. Forest operations do not significantly impact soil productivity and soil erosion. Forest operations, such as roading and logging, are carried out with minimal limi- tations. Class 2 (Average) Soils that comprise this operability class include stable soils that slope less than 30 percent, but on which significant soil erosion, compaction, and displacement may occur as a result of forest operations. " Class 3 (Difficult) This operability class is made up of one or more of the fol- lowing characteristics: (1) stable sails that slope between 30 and 65 percent; (2) soils that slope between 0 and 65 percent, but display evidence that rapid mass movement may occur as a direct result of forest operations_ Class 4 (Extreme) All soils that slope more than 65 percent. variations Unique conditions found in any one geographic area may impact forest Operations to a greater degree than the above classes - permit. Provided that evidence has been documented -, a soil may be placed In a more severe class. BGH:mt 5116 SEP- 25-2010 SAT 09:22PM ID:Nooksack Business Corp. - Naune Kolar PAGE:6 FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN For WHATCOM COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER 380418 - 204150 -0000 Prepared For the Continuance As Open Space Timber As Per RCW 84.34.020(3) Portion ofNEl/4 SWl /4 Section 18 Township 38 North, Range 4 East of the Willamette Meridian Whatcom County Consisting of 8.67 + /- Acres of Forest Land Located at 3817 Squalicum Lake Road CURRENT LANDOWNER David W. dR & Michele Gregory 3817 Squalicum Lake Road Bellingham, WA 98226 -9411 PURCHASER Eric & Vanessa Nielsen 3817 Squalicum Lake Road Bellingham, WA 98226 -9411 David . Anderson Forestry Conau[tcmi 20105 Gina Marie Lane Burlington, WA 98233 -5207 360.757 -0052 August 27, 2003 FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Whatcom County Parcel Number 380418- 204150 -0000 This property is currently owned by David W. JR & Michele Gregory. The property is for sale. The PURCHASER is Eric & Vanessa Nielsen. The property can be described as follows: Portion of the NEl /4 of the SW I/4 of Section 18 all within Township 38 North, Range 4 East, W.M, containing a total of 8.67 + /- Acres of forest land, plus a 1 acre homesite. (That portion ofNEIA SW1/4 beginning at the SE comer of said subdivision [SD], thence North along said SD 300 feet, thence west 726 feet, thence north 66 2/3 feet, thence west 594 feet more or less, thence south 366 2/3 feet more ocless, thence east 1320 feet more or less to the point of beginning.) This Forest Management Plan is prepared for the Continuance As Open Space Timber classification as per RCW 84.34.020(3) for the 8.67 + /- acres of forest land. This property has been in Open Space Timber elassifrcation since the lien date of May 1, 1994. The current zoning is R5A. The minimum lot size is 1 homesite per 5 acres. The goal of the owner is to retain the integrity of the property by maintaining a stand of trees. This will provide for sustainable timber harvests, wildlife habitat, watershed management and recreational activities. The object is to provide for a future return on the investment through good forest management. The forested area is made up of I type, or stand, of timber as follows: Stand (Type) #1; 8.67 + /- acres in size is an immature stand of mixed conifers with mixed hardwoods. The conifers are; Red Cedar, size class 1, 2, & 3 (134h of 1" to 20 "). Western Hemlock, size class 2 & 3 (D4h 6" to 20 "). Douglas Fir, size class 2 & 3 (D4h 6" to 20 "). Red Alder, size class 2 & 6 (D4h of 6" to 20 "), Birch, size class 2 (D4h 6" to 11 "). Bigleaf Maple, size class 1, 2, & 3 (D4h I" to 20"). The age of the stand is 15 years of age to 50 years of age. This stand is Fully Stocked and meets WAC 222 - 34-010(2) requirements. (D4h is the diameter of the tree at 4 feet above stump height.) There are two (2) soil types on the property. Soil data is from the USDA SCS and Washington State DNR Soil Survey of Whatcom County Area, Washington. Pane 1. LABOUNI'Y SILT LOAM, Drained, 0 to 20/6 slopes. The DNR sod number is 4200. The SCS soil nwnber is 94. The 50 year site index for Red Alder is 90. This means that the average Red Alder will grow to a height of 90 feet in 50 years. This soil is stable in both a natural and a distributed state. This soil is deep and poorly drained. There are 7.5+/- acres in this soil type. 2. SQUALICUM GRAVELLY LOAM, 5 to 15% slopes. The DNR soil number is 7500. The SCS soil number is 156. The 50 year site index for Douglas Fir is 132. This means that the average Douglas Fir will grow to a height of 132 feet in 50 years. This soil is stable in both a natural and a disturbed state. This soil is moderately well drained. There a" 1.17 + /- acres in this soil type. Stand (Type) #1 is an immature stand of mixed native conifers with native hardwoods. The conifers are Western Red Cedar, Western Hemlock, and Douglas Fir. The hardwoods are Red Alder, Birch, and Bigleaf Maple. This stand is fully stocked with commercial native tree species and meets stocking requirements of WAC 222 - 34- 010(2). Most of the native hardwoods are of poor form and there best use is for firewood. This stand has changed since 1987 as the current owners have been cutting the poor form hardwoods for firewood. This practice has left a good stand of immature native Western Red Cedar, Western Hemlock, and Douglas Fir. It is recommended that the new owners continue this practice of cutting the poor form native hardwood for use as firewood and leaving the native conifers. The age of the native conifers is mixed and range from 15 to 50 years. It is recommended that the owner consider beginning final harvests about year 2020. Consider doing small clear cuts of about 2 to 3 acres in size. Restrict any harvest to the dry season (July to October). Ground base equipment such as a rubber tire skidder and/or a cat will not degrade the soil providing the activity occurs during the dry season. The logging slash, or debris, which will be created will be classed as an extreme hazard and will have to be eliminated, abated, or reduced. Reforest by planting during the first planting season following any harvest. The planting season for this area is mid -March to early April. Plant these seedlings only after the effects of any COLD Northeaster wind period has passed- Reforest by planting at least 150 2-0 Douglas Fir seedlings and 150 2 -0 Western Red Cedar seedlings per acre. This is 12' X 12' spacing. Consider harvesting of the timber only when there is a high demand for timber, and/or when one has a need for cash. Repeat the above practice of small clear cuts every 5 years until the entire acreage has been harvested and reforested. Economics indicate that one needs to harvest timber at about age 50 to 55 or compound interest on ones' investment will exceed any money received. It is recommended that any final harvest at age 50 to 55 be a clear cut. It is recommended that any harvest be restricted to the dry period (July to mid October.). The harvest method for this area can be a ground based skidder and/or cat providing the harvest is done during the `dry' season. h Reforest any area that is harvested during the first planting season after harvest. The planting season for this area is March 15 to April 15. After the harvest, it is recommended that the owner plant at least 300 seedlings per acre. Plant a mixture of Douglas Fir (150 2-0 seedlings per acre) and Western Red Cedar (150 2 -1 seedlings per acre) using a spacing of 12' X 12' between planted seedlings. A 2-0 seedling is 2 years old and has been grown for 2 years in the same nursery bed. A 2 -1 seedling is 3 years old. It was grown for 2 years in the original nursery bed and grown for I more year in a nursery transplant bed. Plant these seedlings during the first planting season after the harvest. A timber harvest will create logging slash and in this area within 100 feet of Squalicum Lake Road and within 500 feet of any home, barn, garage, etc., this slash will be classed as an Extreme Hazard. An Extreme Hazard has to be abated, reduced, or eliminated or the Owner and Operator are responsible for any fire costs and damages, regardless of the cause of the fire. One will need to monitor the planted area to insure that the seedlings are growing and are not being suppressed by brush species such as Salmonberry. The owner needs to protect the stand from fire. Paying the Forest Patrol Tax each year does this. When the landowner chooses to do a timber harvest, it will be necessary to obtain an approved Forest Practice Application (FPA) as required by RCW 76.09 Forest Practices. This can be obtained from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Creation of logging debris, or slash, within 100 feet of a public road or 500 feet from a home, barn, garage, etc is classed as an Extreme Hazard as defined by RCW 76.04.660 and WAC 332 - 24-650. Any Extreme Hazard roust be reduced, abated, or eliminated. The Northwest Region of the DNR is currently located on Highway 9 in Sedro- Woolley. The owner is allowed to harvest up to 5,000 board feet per year for his own use (but not to be sold) without obtaining an approved FPA (For His Own Use can be defined as having the timber custom sawed for building of a home, barn, shed, etc., or for firewood.) Any timber harvested within the State of Washington pays a 5% Yield Tax at time of harvest, The State of Washington Department of Revenue collects the Forest Excise Tax. At the completion of a timber harvest it will be necessary to reforest the land as required by RCW 76.09 and WAC 222 -34 Reforestation. It is recommended that the owner plant any harvested area during the first planting season following harvest. Plant P a, 300 2 -1 Western Red Cedar seedlings per acre, or 300 2-0 Douglas Fir seedlings per acre (12' X 12' spacing), or a mixture of Cedar and Fir. The planting season is normally January through April, but for this area restrict planting to March 15 to April 30. Tree seedlings are available from the Webster Nursery of the DNR that is located south of Olympia. The DNR at Sedro - Woolley will have current information regarding the purchase of tree seedlings. A 2-0 seedling is 2 years old and has been grown in the same nursery bed. A 2 -1 seedling is 3 years old, having been grown for 2 years in the original nursery bed and 1 year in a nursery transplant bed. The planted seedlings will require monitoring for brush encroachment during the first 5 years, or until the planted seedlings are growing above any competition such as Salmonberry. Brush species can be controlled either by hand slashing (or cutting) or by the use of approved chemicals. If one uses chemicals, obtain information from the DNR or the County Extension Service for correct usage and dosage. If one uses the hand slashing method, then it is recommended that this practice be done only during the months of July and August to prevent the sprouting of the cut stumps. It is recommended that the owner consider hand fertilizing of any planted Douglas Fir seedlings after the first growing season. Consider applying about 1 teaspoon (or about 0.01+ pounds per tree) of Urea fertilizer scattered around the base (4 to 8 inches from the seedling stem) of each planted seedling. Most forest soils in Western Washington are Nitrogen deficient. This type of fertilizer application will last for 5 or more years. It is highly recommended that the owner obtain the services of a professional forestry consultant prior to any timber harvest and reforestation activity. The DNR office at Sedro- Woolley can supply the owner with a list of professional forestry consultants. The consultant can assist the owner in obtaining an approved Forest Practice Application, finding a timber harvester, and reforesting the harvested area. It is also recommended that the owner have a professional forestry consultant do a detailed timber cruise and timber appraisal prior to any planned timber harvest. It is highly recommended that the property boundaries be marked by a licensed land surveyor. The surveyor can mark the boundaries permanently with steel post such as metal fence posts. If the boundaries have been established, then it is recommended that these survey marks be maintained. This will eliminate any confusion as to property boundaries. The owner understands that one must have 5.0 or more acres of forestland for the property to be classed as Open Space - Timber. The current zoning may allow an additional single family residence to be constructed on this property. One must check with Whatcom County to insure the proper zoning and acreage requirements for any additional homes on this property. If a home is constructed, then the owner of record will withdraw one (1) acre from the Open Space — Timber Tax Program Pge G Program for each single family residence constructed. The owner of record will pay any back taxes and /or penalties for the acreage withdrawn from the Open Space — Timber Tax Program. It is the owner's responsibility to protect the forested area from fire. This property is assessed for the State Forest Fire Patrol. The owner's responsibility is accomplished by paying the State Forest Fire Patrol assessment each year. (Protection of buildings on a homesite is accomplished by paying the yearly assessment for the local rural fire department.) ; SOIL TYPE MAP SCS #94 DNR#4200- 1 ahounty Sift Loam, dmined 0 to 2% Slopes 7.5 +/- Aaes Current owner David W IR & Michele Gregory Purchaser Eric & Vanessa Nielsen Portion of the NE 1/4 SW114 Section 18 Township 38 North Range 4 Fag, W.M., Whatcom County Containing 8.67 + 1- Acres Scale 1" = 400, Squalicum Gravelly Loam 5 to 15010 Slopes 1.17 + /- Acres Site index DF132 Site B+ Prepared By David N. Anderson Forestry Consultant 20105 Gina Marie Lane Budington, WA 98233 -5207 360- 757-0052 August 27, 2003 TIMBER TYPE MAP Type 1 Mixed Conifers with Hardwoods site H &III Site Index DF132 & RA90 Age 15 -50 Years origin 1950 to 1990 -_.. . 8. Current Owner David W JR At Michele Gregory Purchaser Eric & Vanessa Nielsen Portion of the NEl /4 SWI /4 seen= is Township 38 North Range 4 East, W.M., Whatcom County Containing 8.67+1- Acres _ Scale I" = 400, rr�o 5w ru reel Oran MIMMIN Prepared By David N. Anderson Forestry Consultant 20105 Gina Marie Lane Burlington, WA 98233 -5207 360 - 757 -0052 August 27, 2003 -? Dodd OST 2004 WHATCOM COUNTY OPENSPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Bill Dodd Designation: Open Space Timber 876 4th Street Updated TMP , Blaine, WA. 98230 Parcel No.: 400121 - 00694171 - 069450 Subarea: Blaine /Birch Bay Parcel Acreage: 20.08 acres Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Acreage in OST: approx 17.5 acres Zoning Desig.: R10A Road Access: Kickerville Road and Holtzheimer Road Shorelines: Rural Designation Land Use: Forest land. Land Use History: Forest land. Soil Type /Capabilities: 4149 - Skipopa- Blainegate complex, 0 - 8% slopes, 90% lot coverage Site Index* 116 - Douglas 6r, 85 - Red alder Limitations /Concern Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness, seedling establishment, hazard of windthrow. #143 - Shalcar muck drained, 0 -2 %slopes, 10% lot coverage Site Index* 95 - Red alder Limitations/Concern High water table, soil acidity., Timber Management Plan Completeness (0--incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2= thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description Mixture of coniferous and hardwoods from seedlings to —40 years of age. Previous harvesting has been either by selective harvesting and by even -age harvesting. Soils Description Complete. Forest Health Appears relatively free of insect orpest problems, no future problems anticipated. Harvest Plan Harvest time frames will vary due to variety of tree age classes and market fluctuations. Thinning Program Precommercial and commercial thinning in those areas as needed to improve stand. Planting /Restocking Program Harvested areas to be reforested as necessary with Western redcedar and alder to fully occupy the site. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Maintaining a sustainable timber stand for wildlife habitat through good forest management. TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval `Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. Bill Dodd OST 400121 f 14 Management Plan for Dodd Property The S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 21 TWP 40N ROIE, W.M. (Tax acct. Ws 40012169450 & 400121) 69417) Landowner. Bill Dodd 876 0. St. Blaine, WA 98230 Plan Prepared by:Aubrey J. Stargell Forester, Nielsen Bros. Inc. (360) 671 -9078 Plan Prepared: 10-07 -03 Landowner Objectives At this time landowner intends to monitor and maintain forest for timber production and wildlife habitat. Landowner favors a less intensive management approach and currently has no significant silvicultural plans. Landowner intends to promote the growth of a variety of conifer and hardwood species for the production of harvestable timber, maintenance of wildlife habitat, and promotion of aesthetic values. General Property Description ' Property was acquired by owner in Summer 2003. ' The subject property area consists of approximately 20 acres. Property dimensions we approximately 660'x 1320'. ' The property has a fish- bearing site= (California Creek) and its associated wetlands running through the southwest portion of the property. California Creek is a shoreline of the state. ' Topography is mostly flat except for the banks above California Creek which have slopes of approximately 30 %. ' The property currently has a variety of timber ages ranging from new seedlings to approximately 40 years. This timber consists of a mixture of hardwoods of primarily red alder with some birch, cherry, and bigleaf maple. The conifer species include western redcedar and Douglas fu. The property has been harvested in the past by previous owners via selective harvesting and even -aged methods. ' The property is bounded by private ownerships on all sides. Adjacent land uses include rural forestry and low density residential. Thus landowners objectives are consistent with existing land uses in the area. The property is accessed via Kickerville and Holtzheimer Roads (Whatcom County Roads). * No portions of the property are being used for grazing. see attached maps for further illustration Forest Health There are currently no significant indicators of forest health problems (insect damage, high fire risk, fungal rots etc..) on the subject property or adjacent properties. No future forest health problems are anticipated within the subject property. Timber and Wood Products There is currently a mix of commercial hardwood and conifer species. Some am are currently merchantable and some are non - merchantable. These species include: red alder (Alms cobra), bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), birch (Bemla sp.), western redcedar (Thuja plicata) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Under current market conditions, the western redcedar is by far the most valuable species on the property. Merchantable timber volumes within the subject area vary from approximately 4 mbf (thousand board feet) per arm to approximately 15 mbf per acre. However, a formal timber cmiw has not been done for this property. Soils All soils information is taken from the Whatcom County Soil Survey published by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1998. There are two soil types in the area. These soils include: Shalcar muck, drained, 0 -2 % slopes and Skipopa- Blainegate complex, 0 -8 % slopes. Shalcar muck, drained: Erosion hazard is slight. Seedling mortality, windthrow hazard, equipment limitations, and plant competition are severe. Thus, seasonal operational restrictions may apply especially when soils are wet. Caution needs to be exercised when selecting equipment for silvicultrn d operations. Low ground impact ground based or cable systems will be more desirable for harvesting operations. Vegetation management measures may need to be employed to control competing vegetation in newly planted areas. This can be accomplished via chemical or manual means. Planting density may need to be higher in these areas. Red alder is the main woodland species. Site index for this soil for red alder is estimated to be 85' on a 50 year basis. Timber volume production is rated at 92 cubic feet per acre per year. Suggested trees to plant include red alder and western redcedar. Skipopa- Blainegate complex : Erosion hazard and seedling mortality risk is slight Plant competition and windthrow hazards are severe. Equipment limitation is moderate. The selection of appropriate equipment would be beneficial, especially during wetter soil conditions. Red alder and Douglas fir are the main woodland species. Site index for this soil is 151' for Douglas fn on a 100 year basis. Timber volume production is rated at 159 cubic feet per acre per year. Vegetation management measures may need to be employed to control competing vegetation in newly planted areas. This can be accomplished via chemical of manual means. Suggested trees to plant include Douglas fir, red alder, and Western redcedw. See the attached table "Woodland Management and Productivity" from the Soil Survey of Whatcom County for reference. Water Quality, Riparian and Wetland Areas California Creek runs through the SW portion of the property and is a fish bearing, shoreline of the state. This stream is protected by a 200' buffer under current regulations. Limited harvesting activity can take place within the 200' buffer only with a conditional use permit issued by Whatcom County and a Forest Practices Permit from the Washington Department of Natural Resources. There are also scattered, forested wetlands within the property which would warrant various protections depending on the type of permits sought (conversion vs. non - conversion Forest Practices Permit). Fish and Wildlife Habitat The forest cover currently existing on the site along with the fish- bearing stream is presently providing habitat for a variety of wildlife. The landowner has no significant silvicultmal plans at this time. Also, California Creek has significant regulatory protection. Thus, this habitat should be maintained into the future. Threatened and Endangered Species and Cultural Resources. There are no known threatened or endangered species present on or relying on the subject property. Future management should have no effect on threatened or endangered species. There are no known cultural issues regarding this property. Management Plans & Timetable Monitor and maintain property. Thinning, pmning, and brush control may be implemented to improve stand over time and ensure the survival of young seedlings The property has a variety of tree age classes. Thus, various areas may warrant thinning (precommercial and commercial). Competing vegetation can be controlled by manual slashing or by herbicide application and either left to decay on site or gathered and barred. The timber on the property can be harvested by ground based methods. Slash will be left on site or otherwise managed to mitigate any potential fire hazard. Harvested areas will be reforested as necessary and appropriate m fully occupy the site. Harvest and management time frames may fluctuate as landowner needs and market changes necessitate. N O S N 3 p a W ✓ F r L 1 L I O y y 7 m ^ ^ Y n m m V ^ _ _ _ 3 O N W O 1 W ry n 0 0 1 1 I I 14 1 1 I I 1 I I I N O S N 3 p r ✓ r r O m m m ^ ^ Y n m m ^ _ _ _ 3 N W O m W ry n 0 0 14 W W ------------------------------------------------ Y v _____q____o_____o____ S 3 S S __ _______a_. W W m ry Y Y p p n q m W M m N y N N O m 0 W 0p0 0540 0040 0040 N1+O £'C N[^£SA N{+SEA 0£A£O •0Yw YLYF mEYm ^0.wx6 r0.Y^0. r6YYG �gY6AO 9 ^t]tM0 ^AMO FOOWV YOOWV MO MW ryVrn ryW 4mUpp W^Y Wr V M1 Np qry qry n oova 0 0 0m oryry V V yrm Ryrp tlS OSrW3 FY OSrp Cmm01 Yp SY Wa LWOWI CpSrypn a' ^63W a 02<Y Om <g Wb 40.1 pb iFnl 6���1 3 v�irM1 ml" 01 pl 0 W M1 O W ryOIm m0 R Mp F O. ry bo %' GO Y 0.O R Oµ1 pyl 160yI 16101 O'M F %'MI YO I %wl 11 %VI %VI IYI %1 %MI I 11 n %MI II III Iryl Iryl I 1 II I II 1 1 1 ryl I 1 1 ry IIn 1 11 1 ;11 1 ; 11 1 11 1 1 1 II 111 I 1 1 1 1 1111 1111 1 1111 I II 1 11 11111 1 111 1111 1111 IIII 11111 11111 II 111 _ _____ —_ —1111 ___________ ______ 1 1111 I;m 111 111 11 111 III 1110 II I N 1110 1110 IIII- IIII- IIII- IIIIU 1 111 1 1 1111 Ilm Illm Illm Illm 1 1 1 Im 11 Illm 1 Im 11 it IW N0 q0 0 NB nA m O q IA4 Y� E °n m y py mz "nn Y win° n r3 r3 r3 r3 O nF ryW m ry 0. M1 M1 ] ] ] l££ uol6uiyseM'eaiy.qunoo wo. Y3 9 O C H S K N L m jng pog Z££ o v x d i µ 1 3i Ti Kg3 PW p n �3G v ~ r r o I rp M 3 N N N N N N SN o Y 60 0 • W _ _ _ _____________ 3 _ 3 _ _ _ _ _ _3 q o o r N n n n n n w 3 3 N r N O6 w n " 6 O > E r •N• o < m M1 ✓n1 1 0 B m m 0. n m m m n w o B Y F rt w R n O p1:00: d9S00 Y000N NOSR 00�W S06 ma m WO y ma ado r 0 G Y G 0. G g P P G tl a" E w 6 G M1 A n 6 0 W M 0 0 P Y NN nYn g .OA 0 0 Y % 0 pW p 0YW W R^mw YOWY OBmd mBY OryWryO Y4 > >BP MnryY 3 MO�PG 0 >>nY •JJ n> > MO�Otl O ^m0.P rAa'7w yp B4 "nP3n �3:3n�r ♦1 F 9 1 am Y Y i n 7 n F 11 P n 1 1 1 3,:7 F" n I Y F, Il 1 O n 1 1" Y n ml m R 1 O Y BImry 10 mim 10 tO mO 1 10^ 1010 Ilpl% %W1 In1% %VI 1 0 WII %Y11 4 IIYI% ONR1� 1 11X1; 11 1 1 1 10.M111 IIM1I IM111 IM1 IIF 1�1 1 II 11" 1 1 1 III I 1 1; 1 1 II 1111 II I III 111 1 11 11111 III I 1 11 11 1 i II111 11111 I I II11 ;I;1 I 1 111 1 1111 X1_1 III 11111 11111 Y N IIr IIIr Illlr 111 I 1 ICI II IIIJa OM nW 1110N IIImU 11110 1110 Ilmq �IU IIIJd Onq rrry III Yµ iiimr ilirN iilio i1op1 11N 11INr inn IIIrN IiiN _____________ ______ _______oY__„m___ 0 ""___________ ^ 0 "m — 0'00 a0 wo° oW m F'0 ma "a oG w• na n w m^ n w n66 m0.° n n° ON Y m mFy mX 4p m 0& FN 0.R % % Nry 60 V B W FX S MF rybr �9Y r3 R M n u X „X 0 `1 O 6 m F M1 9 0 a p. _ Y3 9 O C H S K N L m jng pog Z££ Pease use me e0ena tram me FPA Instruction or provide a list of symbols used. .ap wtpu FOREST PRACTICE ACTIVITY MAP TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH HALF 0, RANGE 01 EAST (W M) HALF 0, SECTION 21 Application rage t of t Monday, October W. 2003 4:53:32 PM MID 83 Contour Interval: 40 Feel Y � 1 ! r pr � 1 x ff, If LL IPI fy F, v Ek v: -. ax A y.� i / L j f rN, rF FS { 1 � �Y ki Id f If c '. :. r !..' :fit :... �.. t .• TOWNSHIP 40 N ,,RAP WHATCOM COUNTY, 1 543 6 DIST j NT3. pLt+ P 4I 1 d igf[MfAN Bf l a 1f.� BM6 A F,':, Uhl 0. GDAyel a 9' 3 iN `e° BIeR<s.� i2 Li6wE "T' co Vlts G. NC _ f L O J� a L.JONE _ I`RRSON _ f .. A.vEIImI vCagl •'R < JQ '_ [}• a • a e q aG [T, BWIJ'4 i ,{fPIGiT L L IB 4 NP GREEN 4i R. 3' VOGT M o6T cl 18�PSM. -0AY. �- D HOZZEF FA,RWAy "GL FLPT y KE`ISON AS 1+ IMAP MP I CT I 15TATC ury FL'ITE IT B•SCMbN IA p wN.eul Cw a.0 T = 7 e - ;t O,N w � MoLO�w45 r [l9 �TO. C:'REEMAN ury FL'ITE P. \N IESEN 4rj r- Fg4 I w *FS MEN w�n Z. BA4y� a.0 = 7 ;t w � r [l9 R.CTE . 1 f, 1P[ <S[ EH.n IN l 4�A n OFS v P. \N IESEN 4rj r- Fg4 I w *FS G WAR< xaZ lfI5U 0.E PARKY. f u\ WI mu A.J. 91 as � 5[(qo AM E _ 8` Y MEN w�n Z. BA4y� WI mu A.J. 91 as � 5[(qo AM E _ 8` Y Y $r x r 2 a ; p � xr or 1 < I I i{+ V I z - - Li R R Levorsen Family Tracts OST 2004 WHATCOH COUNTY OPENSPACE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Lorton K. Levorsen Designation: Open Space Timber 2691 Douglas Road Undated TMP Ferndale, WA 98248 -8906 Parcel No.: 390125 - 197110, - 175144, - 219054, 332130 and - '367194 Subarea: Cherry Point/Ferndale Parcel Acreage:. 121.28 acres Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Acreage in OST: approx 33 acres Zoning Desig.: R5A Road Access: Douglas Road Shorelines: N/A Land Use: Residential, agricultural and forest land. Soil Type/Capabilities: Land Use History: Residential, agricultural and forest land. See Page 17 of the TMP. 012 - Birch Bay silt loam, 0 -3 % slopes, #97- Layton loam, 3 - 8% slopes, 4100 - Lynden sandy loam, 3 - 8% slopes, #102 - Lynnwood sandy loam, 0 - 5% slopes, #179 and #180, Whateom silt loam, 3 - 8% slopes and 8 -15% slopes #182- Whatcom- Labounty silt looms, 0 -8 %slopes, #184 - 9%itehorn silt loam, 0 -2 %slopes Timber Management Plan Completeness Information Included (incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Points Max Current Stand Description See pages 7 and 8, Timber Type #s 1, 2 and 3 2 2 Previous harvesting has been either by selective harvesting and by even-age harvesting. Soils Description Complete. 2 2 Forest Health Appears relatively free of insect orpest problems, no future problems anticipated. 2 2 Harvest Plan Reliance on uneven -aged management or selective harvest techniques where possible, see pages 28 & 29. Thinning Program PrecomMercial and commercial thinning from 15 to 25 years, then every 5 - 15 years, see page 30, 31.2 Planting /Restocking Program Harvested areas to be reforested as necessary with Western redcedar, Douglas fir and alde2 2 suit specific areas, see page 13. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Maintaining a sustainable timber stand for wildlife habitat through good forest management. 2 2 TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval 'Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. Levorsen Family Tracts OST 390125 0 JAN 30 2004 Forest Land Management Plan +L Levorsen Family Tracts. West %z of the Southeast %4, Portions of the Northeast %4 of the Southwest 1/4, and the Southeast '/4 of the Southwest 1/4, all in .Section 25, Township 39 North, Range 1 East, W. M. Whatcom County, Washington.. Prepared for: ATTN: Mr. Lorren K Levorsen Levorsen LLC Lorren K. Levorsen Residence Trust Thelma C. Levorsen Residence Trust Keith. A. and Christine E. Johnson 2691 Douglas Road Femdale, WA 98248 -8906 Prepared by: John D. Gold John Gold & Company, Consulting Foresters 619 Commercial Avenue, Suite 25 Anacortes, WA 98221 (360) 299 - 8166 Final draft: January 2, 2004 JOHN GOLD 6 COMPANY, 619COrmrer (Avenue CONSULTING FORESTERS 9 Anacortes WA 98221 Timber Cruising and Appraisal Phone 360.299.8166 Tmber Sale Adminishanon Fax SW588. 1466 Forestland Management Email gold®fidalgo.not Levorsen Family Tracts: in Section 25, T 39 N, R 1 E Inspected by: John D. Gold Date of inspection: November 26, 2003 Tax Account Nos.: 390125- 1751440000, - 219054 -0000, - 332130 -0000, - 367194 -0000 (Levorsen LLC); 390125- 197110 -0000 (Loam K. Levorsen Residence Trust / Thelma C. Levorsen Residence Trust); 390125 - 255172 -0000, - 278172 -0000 (Keith A. and Christine E. Johnson) Current assessment status: Cross area 128.15 acres Forested area 36 acres +/-2 Area suitable for OST/DFL status: 120 acres The purpose of this Forest Land Management Plan is to serve as a multi- resource planning document in support of enrollment as Open Space - Timberland (OST) and/or Designated Forestland (DFL) in Whatcom County as prescribed in RCW 84.34. It is also intended to be suitable in support of application for inclusion in 1) the Forest Land Enhancement Program (FLEP) and/or Forest. Stewardship Plan Reimbursement Program (FSPRP) as administered by the Washington Department of Natural Resources and/or 2) the Forestry Incentives Program (FIP) as administered by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. It is intended to guide the landowners in long -term management of t Source: Whatcom County Assessor's Office records. r Excludes areas currently cleared for agricultural and residential use. s Excludes only areas cleared for residential use and associated outbuildings. Remaining acres would have to be afforested W be suitable for OST/DFL status. Acres b current assessment status Open Space -Farm Highest and and Agricultural Best Use Owner Parcel Levorsen LLC 175144 5.00 .it 9054 33.11. 332130 56.58 367194 19.70 LK & TC Residence Trusts 19711 6.89 KA & CE Johnson 25517 q_p0 278174 2.67 Cross area 128.15 acres Forested area 36 acres +/-2 Area suitable for OST/DFL status: 120 acres The purpose of this Forest Land Management Plan is to serve as a multi- resource planning document in support of enrollment as Open Space - Timberland (OST) and/or Designated Forestland (DFL) in Whatcom County as prescribed in RCW 84.34. It is also intended to be suitable in support of application for inclusion in 1) the Forest Land Enhancement Program (FLEP) and/or Forest. Stewardship Plan Reimbursement Program (FSPRP) as administered by the Washington Department of Natural Resources and/or 2) the Forestry Incentives Program (FIP) as administered by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. It is intended to guide the landowners in long -term management of t Source: Whatcom County Assessor's Office records. r Excludes areas currently cleared for agricultural and residential use. s Excludes only areas cleared for residential use and associated outbuildings. Remaining acres would have to be afforested W be suitable for OST/DFL status. their forested and nonforested acreage in Whatcom. County. In keeping with the dynamic nature of both forest systems and the planning process, it is expected that this Plan will be reviewed periodically and revised, if necessary, to reflect changing conditions. The OST program is designed by statute to preserve the current use of property. The RCWs specifically provide that an OST property be contiguous ownership of one or more parcels of five acres or greater which is devoted "primarily to the growth and harvest of forest crops for commercial purposes ". The Open Space Program is also targeted at providing benefits from forest areas including: 1) the conservation or enhancement of natural, cultural or scenic resources; 2) the protection of wetlands and natural shorelines; 3) the protection of soil resources and unique or critical wildlife and native plant habitats; 4) the promotion of conservation principles and educational opportunities, and; 5) enhancement of the value of adjacent natural areas, sanctuaries and open spaces. A DFL property must be "contiguous ownership of 20 or more acres which is primarily devoted to and used for growing and harvesting timber." A complete Forest Land Management is essenti al to supporting new enrollments in Whatcom County's OST and DFL Programs. Because of the unique features of the Levorsen Family properties, it is an excellent candidate for inclusion in the OST or DFL program. Open Space -Farm and Agriculture (OSA) properties may be transferred to OST and/or DFL without additional tax, interest, or penalty, subject to all applicable qualifications for the new classification. FLEP/FSPRP are federally funded programs intended to provide financial incentives to non - industrial private forest landowners to "manage their property using an integrated multi- resource approach." Cost- sharing for specified land management practices is available, as determined on a case -by -case basis, on properties between 20 and 1,000 acres. An approved Forest Stewardship Plan is required to access cost -share funds towards these practices. FIP is a federal program intended to share the cost of reforestation and timber stand improvement, on non - industrial private forest land properties between 10 and 5,000 acres. An acceptable Forest Management Plan is required to access cost -share funds towards these practices. The Levorsen Family properties are an excellent candidate for inclusion in the Stewardship Incentives Program and Forestry Incentives Program. General Property Description The Levorsen Family properties are located about one miles southwesterly of the City Ferndale, in western Whatcom County (aerial photograph,. Figure 1). It is an irregular shaped, 128.15 acre property, approximately %a mile wide, at the widest points.° The property consists of seven adjoining parcels held by three entities. The property is bounded to the north by Douglas Road (paved, County). Internal roads serve as driveways and resource roads. Three single family residences with associated outbuildings and landscaping, plus several farm buildings, are present. one residence is a rental and the others serve family members. Some external and internal fences in various states of repair are present. No Authoritative survey monumentation was recovered. The approximate location of most property lines is evident from historic land uses. Distances and acreages cited in dais report are approximations only. No member of this firm is a licensed land surveyor in the State of Washington and no survey was performed or recorded in the preparation of these reports; an independent land survey would authoritatively reveal lot dimensions and acreage. Maps, sketches, figures, and exhibits contained herein were prepared using field measurements, aerial phomgmphy, and other sources; they are intended only to aid the reader in visualizing the property described herein; relative sizes and positions of features are approximations only. Land Use History The general vicinity of the Levorsen Family properties is characterized by predominantly twenty acre and larger lot sizes with mixed use. In general, larger lots tend to support agricultural with some forestry use. In general, smaller lots tend to be one acre to ten acres, with rural residential use. A number of other nearby properties support hybrid cottonwood plantations under long term ]ease agreements. Many other nearby properties are enrolled in various current use assessment programs. The Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan designation is Rural with Zoning RSA. The current Urban Growth Area of Femdale borders the Levorsen Family properties to the north: current allowable density is 3 units per acre in the UGA. The current land use on the Levorsen Family properties is agriculture (hay) with single family residences and some forestry... Land use on the property has historically been agriculture. The bulk of the property was acquired by Loren R. and Thelma C. Levorsen in 1972 with some parcels acquired in 1988 and 1998. The Johnson properties were transferred in 1997. In 1998, as the result of estate planning, entities were created to receive much of the property. The majority of the Levorsen Family properties were likely first harvested and cleared for agriculture before the turn of the century; some steep and wet areas were harvested but not cleared Some forested areas of the Levorsen LLC properties (formerly Dickeson) and Johnson properties (formerly Hidden) appear to have been last harvested in about 1940. Other forested areas of the Levorsen LLC properties (formerly Levorsen) were selectively harvested (high - graded) with removal focusing on Douglas fir in about 1965. The only harvesting known to have occurred under Levorsen Family tenure is periodic salvage of mortality for firewood and personal use; a considerable volume of board and timbers (including cedar, maple, cherry, and cottonwood) is currently stockpiled for future use. Approximately 8 acres of the Levorsen LLC properties were afforested in 2003 to mixed species plantations. Future afforestation projects are scheduled. Previous generations of the Levorsen Family were engaged in sawmilling and forestland ventures in Minnesota. No grazing is currently practiced, though several homes were kept until recently.. Landowner Goals 1) To reduce the cost of long term forest land ownership by maintaining the property— some of which is devoted to the long term growth and harvest of commercial forest products - -in a current use tax assessment program. Specifically, to transfer the following parcels, totaling approximately 58.9 acres, from OSA/HBU to DFL:. • Parcel A: The South 150 feet of the Southeast' /, of the Southwest %4; • Parcel B: The Southwest %4 of the Southeast '/4 less the following described lands: beginning at the northwest comer of said Quarter Quarter. Section, thence 600 feet southerly along the west line of said Quarter Quarter Section, thence approximately 781 feet northeasterly to a point on the north line of said Quarter Quarter Section which lies 500 feet easterly of the northwest comer, thence 500 feet westerly to the point of beginning; • Parcel C: The South 700 feet of the East 150 feet of the Northwest %4 of the Southeast %4; • Parcel D: Beginning at the southwest comer of the Northwest Y, of the Southeast '/4, thence 500 feet easterly to the true point of beginning thence 1200 feet North 19° East, thence 300 feet easterly along a line parallel to the south line of said Quarter Quarter Section, thence 1200 feet South 190 West, thence 300 feet westerly along the south line of said Quarter Quarter Section to the true point of beginning; • Parcel E: The Johnson Tracts (as described by metes and bounds under Whatcom County Tax Account Numbers 390125- 255172 -0000 and 390125 - 278172 -0000) less the North 250 feet thereof; • Parcel F: The Dickeson Tract (as described by metes and bounds under Whatcom County Tax Account Number 390125- 175144 - 0000); all in Section 25, Township 39 North, Range 1 East, w.M.5 2) To practice good forest stewardship and resource conservation by managing the forested acreage in an ecologically sustainable manner. Practices will reduce the risk of catastrophic loss from fire, wind, disease, and insects. 3) To afforest portions of the property currently in agricultural uses in order to establish Productive forests and provide buffers from adjoining properties. 4) To generate future income from the sustainable harvest of commercial forest products. Reliance on uneven aged management / selective harvest techniques wherever possible is a specific goal of the current landowner. ' The proposed DFL areas approximate the currently forested areas (see Timber Types 1, 2, 3, and 11 below) and agricultural areas scheduled for afforestation (see Types 4, 5, 6, and J2) and include approximately 4 acres of open water /noncommercial forest/bottomland surrounded by forested areas and managed principally for wildlife habitat (see Type 7). Sce Figure 2 for approximate DFL areas. Resource Inventory This section describes current resource conditions, some appropriate management alternatives, and relevant regulatory requirements. The eight resource categories conform to the requirements of the Stewardship Incentives Program. I: TIMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS Existing Vegetation Approximately 36 acres of the Levorsen Family properties are currently forested. The non - forested areas are devoted to agricultural and single family residential uses. The forested portions of the property contain mixed age hardwoods and conifers, with the majority of merchantable volume averaging 60+ years. Twelve timber types/ management compartments, based on age, stocking, operational considerations, and past management history were identified from aerial photography and on -site inspection. These are shown in Figure 3 and described in greater detail. below. Understory vegetation in forested areas is fairly typical of lowland sites in Whatcom County. A vigorous and diverse shrub layer includes the following species: sahnonberry, snowberry, elderberry, and vine maple. The herbaceous layer commonly contains swordfen and trailing blackberry. Low lying areas contain hardback, lady fern, and slough sedge. Evergreen and Himalayan blackberry, invasive weeds which likely became established following harvesting, are present in areas of low overstory stocking. rl'imber Type 1 (approximately 5 acres) is a moderately stocked stand of 60+ year old hardwoods and conifers. This Type corresponds to the Levorsen LLC parcel (390125 - 175144 -0000) aka the Dickeson Tract. Red alder comprises the majority of merchantable volume; red cedar and bigleaf maple are also present. A patchy understory of advance regeneration red cedar is present. Timber quality is average to good, with some weather damage and associated defect. Soils in locally depressional areas here (about 20 % by area) have restricted drainage and would be considered a hardwood site. Site Index' is estimated to average about 110, or high -Site Class' III. Estimated basal areas averages about 80 percent of normal basal area for stands of this site and age.9 Merchantable volume is estimated to be about 12 to 17 MBF per acre.10 Growth rate is moderately a Site Index is a measure of growing potential. Its value is the predicted height of a free - growing tree of a given species at a given age. Unless otherwise . stated, all references to Site Index herein are based on a Douglas fir 50 year curve. ' Site Class is a generalized measure of growing conditions for naturally forested areas, where'V is excellent and "V" is not. ' Basal area is one measure of tree density (integrating size and spacing), and is typically expressed in squaw feet per acre. Trees per acre is a measure of density which is independent of individual not size. Determined from Table I in: Charles J. Chambers (1989) -E-rnl?irical erowth and yield tables for th Douglas fir zone, ma Note that no timber cruise was performed in the preparation of these reports and volumes shown are ocular estimates only. A timber cruise is recommended if an accurate estimate of volume is required. slow, and declinin per year. g. and is estimated to currently average about 0.3 to 0.4 MBF per acre Timber Type 2 (approximately 20 acres) is a well stocked stand of mixed hardwoods and red cedar. This type occupies an esker was likely was never cleared for agricultural uses. Red cedar and bigleaf maple comprise the majority of merchantable volume; red alder is also present. Site Index is estimated to average about 100, or low -Site Class M. Merchantable volume is estimated to be about 17 to 22 M 3F per acre. Growth rate is moderately slow, and declining, and is estimated to currently average about 0.4 to 0.5 MBF per acre per year; Timber Type 1(approximately 8 acres) is a moderately well stocked stand of mixed conifers and red alder;. alder and Sitka spruce is concentrated in lower lying areas. This premerchantable type occupies former agricultural land and was afforested in March, 2003. It was hand planted in rows at an density of 540 TPA. glyphosate Applications of were made in July and September, 2003; the site was A. tilled between rows in late July. October, 2003, . stocking survey indicates about 30 to 40 % mortality, principally in Douglas fir. hispection during November, 2003, suggests mortality is largely attributable to high soil moisture; some incidence of poor planting in evident in a small fraction of seedlings; non - lethal damage from herbicides was noted on several living seedlings; small ruamrual girdling was noted on one seedling; defect in seedling stock has been suggested and is plausible. By ocular estimate, the western 1/3 (upper elevations, mapped as Laxton foams) are probably well suited to Douglas fir' 1 , the middle 1/3 (lower elevations associated with the Type 3 stream /drainage ditch apparent expression of Labounty soils mapped as Wha[com- Labountysilt loams) are probably best , suited to red alder, and the eastern 1/3 (upper elevations, apparent expression of Whatcom soils mapped as Wbatcom- Labounty silt loams) are difficult to conclusively categorize 12 . Interplantingis scheduled for spring, 2004,13 Site hrdex is not possible to estimate; based on soil types, Douglas fir Site Class likely ranges from V1° to III. Timber Type 4 (approximately 6 acres) is agricultural land scheduled for afforestation in spring, 2004. Soils are mapped as Whatcom- Labounty silt foams. Site Index is not possible to estimate; based on soil types, Douglas fir Site Class likely ranges from V's to III. This stand does not meet acceptable stocking levels for forest land in WAC 222 -34 -010 and supplemental reforestation is required (for enrollment in OST/DFL). The eastern margin of this area was delineated on site for the purposes of scheduled interplantiug. rr Surviving Douglas fir seedlings in this area appear slightly chlorutic with less leader growth than the i"westem 1/3" area; depth to low- pemxabihty substratum is less than 2 feet where exposed. Recommendations for interplanting are given below. ra the low productivity Douglas fa sites are probably better suited to hardwoods, with estimated red alder Site Class III. is the low productivity Douglas 6r sites are probably better suited to bardwoods, with estimated red alder Site Class In. Timber Type 5 (approximately 4.5 acres) is agricultural land scheduled for afforestation in spring, 2005. This Type corresponds to the South 150 feet of the LevorsenLLC parcel (390125- 219054 - 0000). Soils are mapped as Whitehom silt loams. Standing water was present over much of the area during November, 2003, inspection. Site Index was not estimated, but the adjoining property supports a moderately stocked mature stand of alder and cottonwood; based on soil type, Site Index for red alder is likely about 90. This stand does not meet acceptable stocking levels for forest land in WAC 222 -34010 and supplemental reforestation is required (for enrollment in OST/DFL). Timber Type 6 (approximately I acre) is agricultural land scheduled for afforestation in spring, 2005. It represents a dogleg adjacent to Type 2 which is difficult to manage for agricultural purposes. Soils are mapped as Whitehom silt loams..Site Index was not estimated; based on soil type, Site Index for red alder is likely about 90. This stand does not meet acceptable stocking levels for forest land in WAC 222-34 -010 and supplemental reforestation is required (for enrollment in OST/DFL). Type 7 (approximately 4 acres) includes a farm pond, associated wetlands, and neighboring grain field. These areas are managed principally as habitat for migratory waterfowl, fish, and other aquatic species Type 8 (approximately. 67 acres + / -) includes all remaining agricultural and residential lands. All areas other than about 4 acres (principally residential and ag building uses) would be suited to growth and harvest of commercial forest crops if afforested. Timber Type J1 (approximately 2.91 acres) is a moderately stocked stand of 60+ year iold hardwoods and conifers. This Type corresponds to the South 500 feet of the Johnson _ i parcel (390125- 255172- 0000). Red cedar and red alder comprise the majority of i merchantable volume; Douglas fir and bigleaf maple are also present. Site Index is estimated to average about 110, or high -Site Class Ill. Merchantable volume is estimated to be about 10 to 15 MBF per acre. Growth rate is moderately slow, and declining, and is estimated to currently average about 0.3 to 0.4 MBF per acre per year. Mortality in red alder is moderately high. 1 i JJ d 3 /z.9I Timber Type J2 (approximately 1.19 acres ) is a gricultural land scheduled for afforestation in spring, 2004. This Type corresponds to the South 500 feet of the Johnson' parcel (390125- 278172- 0000). Soils are mapped as Whatcom- Labounty silt foams. Site i Index is not possible to estimate; based on soil types and adjoining merchantable timber, Douglas fir Site Class is likely about III.. This stand does not meet acceptable stocking levels for forest land in WAC 222 -34 -010 and supplemental reforestation is required � (for enrollment in OST/DFL). Timber Type J3 (approximately 2.77 acres) is currently developed for residential and incidental agricultural uses. This Type corresponds to the North 250 feet of the Johnson 2Z� parcels (390125- 255172 -0000 and - 278172- 0000). Io Type RT1 (approximately 6.89 acres) includes the LK & TC Residence Trust parcel (390125- 197110 -0000) all of which is currently developed for residential uses. Current landowner goals is to manage this area separately from the remainder of the agricultural and residential lands (Type 8). Timber Volume 6 By ocular estimate, the property contains about 400 to 500 M 3F of merchantable timber, with an approximate species distribution of: 30 % red cedar, .10 % other conifer, 40 % red alder, and 20 % other hardwoods. Exclusive of riparian buffers and other leave trees required under current regulations, an estimated 350 to 450 MBF could be legally recovered. The current market value of this timber (as stumpage) is likely in the range $ 150,000 to 175,000. Character of Timber Red cedar: primarily former understory type trees released during 1940 to 1960's era harvesting. Moderately rough and limby, with below average form. Highly defective with old snowbreak common at 50+ feet. Other conifer: average quality medium sawtimber. Alder: most of the merchantable volume is mature to overmature sawtimber, with some old weather damage but good surface quality, Maple: mostly limby and crooked, utility and saw quality. 16 Figures in this section are rough estimates only. A timber cruise and appraisal is recommended if an acanate value estimate is required. Such an assessment is recommended to establish the timber basis; proper documentation of basis can result in significant federal tar savings at the time of timber harvest. 10 General Timber Management Strategies Timber harvest. The property contains mature timber, which is of an age considered economically optimal for harvest. The following silvicultuml options are available: 1. Clearcut harvest. This entails removal of all merchantable timber, excluding required leave trees, from the property in a single operation. In addition, typically all unmerchantable and noncommercial trees are cut. This technique has the .advantage that it often best prepares the site for establishing a new stand of Douglas fir or red alder, which, being relatively shade - intolerant species, require conditions of fill sunlight and minimal competition from residual trees and shrubs; this technique generally has the lowest logging costs. Disadvantages on this site would include: aesthetic concerns; and, elimination of wildlife habitat for species requiring a closed or partially closed canopy. Reforestation would be required. 2. Seed tree or shelterwood regeneration harvest. These entail retention of 5 to 30 trees per acre, evenly spaced across the harvested area; typically the leave trees are healthy, vigorous dominants or codonimants. As with clearcut harvest, the goal is the initiation of a new age class of trees.- Following seedling establishmcnt, residual overstory trees should be reduced to no more than 12 per acre. These techniques are not frequently used in lowland Puget Sound forests, and are not suited to the subject property. The advantages on the property would include: aesthetic concerns; and retention of wildlife habitat for species requiring a closed or partially closed canopy. Disadvantages on this site would include: a severe risk of windthrow due to soil conditions; somewhat higher logging costs; can be difficult to implement in small (less than 5 acre) units; the invasion by brush species following harvest; and, lack of desirable leave trees in the current stand.. Artificial reforestation would likely be required. 3. Commercial thinning. This entails removing a fraction of the merchantable trees, leaving the site near fully stocked; on this site, a residual basal area of about 110 ft' per acre would be appropriate for pure conifer stands. Thinning can also be performed to a residual density or spacing: Table 1 provides a means to determine appropriate spacing figures at different stages in the rotation. Removal typically focuses on trees that are: less vigorous; in lower canopy positions; poorly spaced; defective; or otherwise undesirable. The goal is to reduce competition for light, water, and nutrients and redirect these resources to the healthier, most vigorous, and most desirable trees. Disadvantages on this site would include: a moderate risk of windthrow due to soil conditions; and higher logging costs. Commercial thinning is not appropriate for the current hardwood dominated stands. Reforestation would not be required. 11 Table 1: Parameters for use in determining commercial thinning specifications: starting with known stand diameter (from cruise data) or stand age determine an average post- thinning spacing by interpolation for a target residual basal area. Approximate Equivalent Terms for Average Stand Age of Stand Corresponding a Basal Area/Acre After Thinning of DiametertrAfter to Average Stand Diameter 80 feet, 120 feet, Thummg Unmamagedrs Manaeedty TPA" ac' ' TPA Snacine 8 26 25 230 14 345 11 10 41 31 147 17 220 14 12 54 37 102 21 153 17 14 67 43 75 24 113 20 16 80 47 57 28 86 23 18 94 54 45 31 68 25 20 107 59 37 34 56 28 22 120 65 30 38 45 31 Selection harvest/uneven aged management This entails removal of individual or small groups of trees; traditionally this technique has been used to remove only the largest and most valuable trees (referred to as highgrading), but many other scenarios are possible. In order for uneven aged management to be successful, in the sense of achieving maximum productivity and maintaining a healthy forest, intensive stand tending is required in addition to periodic harvest of the older trees. To do so requires - -at each and every harvest entry-- stocking control (precommercial or commercial thinning) in each age cohort, adequate control of competing vegetation and animal damage in youngest cohorts (generally less than 15 years), and initiation of a new age class of desirable species (for this stand, Douglas fir or red alder). It is worth noting that previous selective harvests failed to regenerate more than a token component of Douglas fir: in theory Douglas fir requires an opening at least %4to %: acre in size or a residual canopy of less than 30 trees per acre (approximately 40 foot spacing). In actual practice, it is difficult to manage for Douglas fir in openings less than several acres on most sites. Previous harvest entries resulted in the establishment of very little regeneration of conifer species: in the future, to insure a promptly and fully occupied site, artificial reforestation is recommended, though not required by law. Harvests could average once per decade. Harvest must include, if not focus 014 the types of trees discussed above under commercial thinning; if it does not, growth and r, Quadratic rem diameter at breast height (dbh, 4.5 feet above gronnd level) for trees 7.0 inches aid greater. rs Interpolated from Table 5 in Charles J. Chambers (1989) Empirical growth and vield tihIcs for Douglas fir zone, Site Index 110, PNBA = IW1. " Assumes a program of regular light commercial thinning harvests resulting in sustained radial growth of 6 rings per inch. Now that growth patterns differ between managed and untuanaged stands, between different management strategies, and vary according to initial planting density and species, and . 30 Trees per acre. rr Square spacing (e.g., 14'x 14') to the nearest whole foot. 12 productivity of the stand will decline over time. Advantages of uneven . aged management for this site include: retention of closed canopy conditions over most areas at any given time. Disadvantages on this site would include: possible residual stand of lower vigor and value; lower rate of return; if not properly applied does not create suitable conditions for regeneration by shade intolerant species; a high risk of windthrow due to soil conditions; invasion by brush species following harvest; and higher logging costs (can be partially offset by a higher average delivered log value). This type of harvest system is very difficult -- if not impossible - -to implement in an ecologically sustainable manner in most forest types of western Washington.. General post harvest management activities: Assumes regeneration harvest has occurred: Site preparation. At the conclusion of harvest activities, slash should be abated to facilitate reforestation and reduce hazard of wildfire. Appropriate techniques, in descending order, for this site include:. pile and burn, lop and scatter, and pile only. If reforestation does not occur within the first year after harvest, treatment of competing vegetation may be necessary: chemical treatment would be preferred to mechanical. Reforestation. Under WAC 222 -34 -010, reforestation is required within three years of completion of regeneration harvest activities; planting must be at a density sufficient to yield 190 vigorous, undamaged, well distributed seedlings of commercial species per acre after the second . growing season. Parameters appropriate to conifer sites (currently forested) are 435 seedlings per acre; planting should occur in the first season after harvesting, typically late winter to early spring Soil conditions observed on the Levorsen LLC and Johnson parcels suggest that about 20 to 30 % of the area are not especially well drained. These areas tend to have an understory of youth -on -age and lady fem, in contrast with drier microsites which have an understory of snowberry, swordfem, and trailing blackberry; less -well drained microsites do not have an abundance of old growth conifer stumps, although it is possible portions of the property were cleared following initial logging. On less -well drained microsites, replanting red cedar or red alder is recommended. Following regeneration harvest, if red cedar is chosen for less -well drained microsites, replanting Douglas fir is recommended on drier microsites; otherwise, the entire area should be replanted with red alder: Planting of shade intolerant species (Douglas fir and red alder) is not recommended for openings less than several acres; small openings should be planted with shade tolerant species (hemlock for drier microsites, red cedar for any location). 13 Control of animal damage. In early years of seedling establishment deer browsing can be a problem; deer sign is plentiful but browsing by deer was not noted to be a problem in. It is probably best addressed by initial planting of vigorous stock at a high density; once the leader of young trees exceeds about 5 feet in height the browsing becomes less significant. Bud caps, seedling tubes, and/or scented repellent may be necessary to avoid damage and mortality and grow the trees to this height. Adequate site preparation will help to control populations of rabbits and small mammals; in pasture settings, subsequent control of grasses is strongly recommended. Another techniques which may be effective for small mammal control is installation of raptor perches in and at the margin of afforested areas. In general, small mammal damage was not noted in recently planted areas; some tunnels are present. The site should be surveyed annually until seedlings are approximately 6 feet to determine extent of browsing damage. Control of competing vegetation 32 On the property there is moderate to severe risk of invasion by brushy species and hardwoods. In addition, bigleaf maple and cottonwood stumps can be expected to sprout prolifically. The site should be surveyed at least annually until two to five years after harvesting to determine nature and extent of competing vegetation. Chemical or mechanical control should be used as appropriate; it is likely at least one, and possibly more than two treatments will be required to ensure successful establishment of a new conifer stand. Of particular note, blackberry species are likely to be a problem. These species should be chemically controlled prior to becoming well established. Precommercial thinning. This treatment maybe considered about 10 to 15 years after seedling establishment in conifer types; it should be first applied about 5 to 8 years after establishment in alder types. It is ideally performed at the point of crown closure, an as to transfer resources from the less vigorous to more vigorous saplings. Properly applied, it can substantially increase the production of merchantable timber, and from an economic standpoint, this technique is best suited to productive sites. Commercial thinning. This treatment may be performed starting at about age 25 and subsequently up to every five to fifteen years thereafter until final harvest. In order to maximize yield and economic return over the rotation, removal should focus on trees that are: in lower canopy positions; less vigorous; in smallest diameter classes; and defective or otherwise undesirable. Residual basal area after each thinning, regardless of age of stand, should be about 100 to 110 ft" for conifer stands on this site. Hardwood stands are generally not commercially thinned in the Pacific Northwest. Final harvest. If planted Douglas fir stands have no intermediate treatments, i.e., precommercial or commercial thinnings, and assuming management typical of most small landowners, yield of even aged stands can be expected to average about 14 tol8 v Additional information about specific pesticides mentioned in the text can be obtained at http: //w cdms t/manuf/ mtf as (product labels and material safety data sheets) or ham:/ /ace orst edu/' f / 'c/techhttn hnd (toxicology, health, and environnemal data). 14 MBF per acre if harvested at an economic maturity of 50 years. Assuming intensive management, yield could be increased to up to 23 MBF per acre at age 50.23 If the stand has regular light thinnings, economic maturity may be extended to well over 100 years, depending on management regime and rate -of -return expectation. Unmanaged hardwood stands can be expected to yield about 7 to 14 MBF per acre at age 40 to 50.24 v From Table 9 in Charles J. Chambers (1989) Empirical growth and yield tables for the Douglas fm zone. Interpolated from Table 6 in Charles J. Chambers (1992) Emirical yield tables for predominantly alder stands in Western Washington. Reliable yield tables for managed hardwood stands have not been developed, though ane dotal evidence suggests alder yields of up to 20 MBF at age 40. 15 H:. FOREST HEALTH The property appears relatively free from insect and fungal pathogens. Extensive stem and butt rot is present in the red cedar, particularly in association with older weather damage, within expectation for this age of timber. Rots detract from the quantity and quality of recoverable wood products; they can also lead to windthrowor direct mortality. Root and butt rots spread through inter -tree root contact;. some causal fungi can persist in stumps and dead roots for decades. Red alder and paper birch are naturally short lived species which typically begin to _decline at about age 60. Losses of timber quality and quantity can he quite rapid and severe at advanced ages. It is advisable to harvest hardwood stands prior to this point. Weather damage dating to the mid 1950s and associated rot is fairly common in the older hardwoods. Competition from brush is a serious concern on the property. Most brush species present in the understory of existing stands are capable of vigorous sprouting . from root . systems and can dominate harvested areas if not treated: This can result in significant growth losses and mortality of planted conifers. Principal brush species of concern are: salmonbeny and snowbeny. Himalayan, evergreen, and trailing blackberry has potential to invade the site. Competing hardwood tree species of concern are: cottonwood, birch, bigleaf maple, and alder. Herbaceous vegetation is also likely to be a significant competitor. 16 III: SOILS AND LOGGING CONDITIONS The property occupies uplifted glaciomarine drift plains; elevations range from about 50 to 150 feet above sea level (topographic map, Figure 4). The Levorsen Family properties has slopes averaging less than 10 % with generally southeasterly aspects. Soils are classified as Birchbay silt loam, Laxton loam; Lynden sandy loam, Lynnwood sandy loam, Whatcom silt loam, Whatcom- Labolmty silt learns (complex), and Whitehom silt loans Labounty silt loans, Whatcom silt loam, and Whatcom- Labounty silt loam complex (map units 12, 97, 100, 102, 179/180, 182, and 184, respectively, in Figure 5) 2s Mapped soils are highly variable over short distances; field observations confirm this and suggest some am of discrepancy with mapped types. The spatial variability is likely due to the dynamic glaciomarine and glaciofluvial processes by which the soils were formed. Some properties of these soils am summarized as follows: The forested portions of the property has previously been harvested using ground methods. Old skid trails are present in Timber Type 2. In the future, operation of ground equipment should be restricted to the dry season to prevent rutting and soil compaction. Rubber tired or tracked skidders would be acceptable; shovel equipment would be most suitable to prevent soil damage. However, in most selective harvest situations, shovel equipment would not be preferred in order to avoid damage to residual trees. Selective harvest should be avoided April to June during sap flow, also in order to avoid excessive damage to residual trees. The Levorsen Family properties are served from Douglas Road a paved driveway and a loop gravel fans road. Construction of short intemal spurs may be desirable in order to ss Unless otherwise noted, descriptions of soils contained herein are based on USDA Soil Survey (1992) Soil Survey of Whatcom County Arm Washington. A complete site - specific soil survey was beyond the scope of this investigation, and was not performed in the preparation of this report. 17 Seasonal hi h water table Erosion oil Map 1 Parent materials Depth Drainage permeability Timing Depth Hazard Birchbay silt loam 12 wreworked ry . dable December 4'b 48indres slwht Wdomadne drift plain deep wall o April. Laxton loam 97 oess, vdcanic ash, ry erately moderate b ovember 30 b 42'ardles. light adal outwash deep well very rapid o April Lynden sandy loam 100 loess, volcanic ash, xoesdve moderate b none iOhl Wcial wtwosh deep very rapid Lynnwood sandy loam 102 Iadollmial depce0s very omawhat rapid we light deep cessye aleom silt loam 179, ease, vdcenic ash, ry moderately moderate to December inches fight 180 adomenne drat eep II ow Apol atoom-Labounty silt 162 bass, volcanic ash, ry :mod. wall moderate to : D b A Vsurfaw light loans (complex), latlal oulwash L: poor low : NO May: itehom silt loams 784 w rewodred sbw toova ight aciornartne drat plains eep y The forested portions of the property has previously been harvested using ground methods. Old skid trails are present in Timber Type 2. In the future, operation of ground equipment should be restricted to the dry season to prevent rutting and soil compaction. Rubber tired or tracked skidders would be acceptable; shovel equipment would be most suitable to prevent soil damage. However, in most selective harvest situations, shovel equipment would not be preferred in order to avoid damage to residual trees. Selective harvest should be avoided April to June during sap flow, also in order to avoid excessive damage to residual trees. The Levorsen Family properties are served from Douglas Road a paved driveway and a loop gravel fans road. Construction of short intemal spurs may be desirable in order to ss Unless otherwise noted, descriptions of soils contained herein are based on USDA Soil Survey (1992) Soil Survey of Whatcom County Arm Washington. A complete site - specific soil survey was beyond the scope of this investigation, and was not performed in the preparation of this report. 17 keep future harvest operations separate from residential areas and to avoid damaging the Paved mad. For other than dry season use, forest roads will require surfacing. A source of suitable rock for road construction was not noted on the property. Under RCW 76.09, many forest practices, including certain timber harvest and road construction projects, require advance appli cation to —and approval by - -the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR). A complete Forest Practices Application (FPA) includes a description of the proposed project and the affected environment, as well as documentation of compliance measures with all applicable forest practices rules (WAC 222). The FPA is reviewed by DNR, as well as any other federal, State, and local agencies with jurisdiction. Per WAC 222 -24 -051., a complete Road Maintenance and Abandonment Plan (RMAP) covering all Forest Roads on the contiguous ownership could be required as a condition of FPA approval. Road maintenance requirements are unrelated to tax status or zoning, and apply to all forest land owner;. Potentially Unstable Soils None were noted on the subjectproperty. W IV: RIPARIAN AND WETLAND AREAS The Forest Practices Activity Map for the vicinity (Figure 4) indicates a Type 5 streant.26 Site inspection indicates that this stream meets the dimensional criteria for a Type 3, of potentially fish - bearing, stream.. This stream, which functions principally as a drainage ditch, may have been constructed in the past. Reportedly, sticklebacks have been detected downstream and off -site. At the headwater of the mapped stream, a farm pond is present; this pond was partially excavated from non - forested wetlands. The constructed outlet and overflow to this pond are barrier to fish passage. There are two unmapped streams tributary to the pond which meet the dimensional criteria for Type 3 waters. The headwater portion of one of these is reportedly fed by a perennial spring, and meets the dimensional criteria for a Type 4 water.. Wetlands are defined (Corps of Engineers, 1987; Washington State Department of Ecology, 1997) as areas which "are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" and include swamps, bogs, fens; and marshes .21 Wetlands can be identified by the presence of characteristic vegetation, soils, and hydrology.. Wetlands, though fairly common in glacially modified landscaped such as the Puget trough, are recognized to provide significant and often unique functions within the ecosystem, including storm- and flood- water storage, water quality improvement, groundwater exchange, and biological habitat support. Because of the features and functions of wetlands, land management activities in .their immediate environs may be regulated under local, State, and/or federal law. Forest Practices in and near wetlands -- including timber harvest, road construction, site preparation, and chemical application —are specifically regulated under Washington law. Small wetlands are present in depressional areas throughout the property. A small Forested Wetland is present in the central portions of the property. It is likely harvest would be permitted in the forested wetlands on the Levorsen Family properties, with limitations on the timing of operation and types of equipment. A non - forested Type A Wetland is present associated with the farm pond. At least a portion of this wetland appears to be perennially inundated; as such, fish habitat may be present (see Section V for more complete discussion). Harvest from an average width 50 foot buffer strip around Type A Wetlands is restricted. 36 Note that stream ratings shown on the Activity Map are interim, and subject to revision according to actual field conditions (see Section V for additional discussion). 2' Note that federal definitions ofjurisdictional wetlands differ between agricultural land and other land uses. W91 V: FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INCLUDING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Fish Habitat The subject property is within the Nooksack drainage. The Nooksack River and its tributaries have been designated as habitat for the Puget Sound Chinook Evolutionarily Significant Unit, listed as Threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act.. A non - forested Type A Wetland is present associated with the farm pond (see - Section IV). The inundated area of this wetland likely meets the definition of a Type 3 (potentially fish bearing) water based on physical criteria. A Riparian Management Zone (RMZ) is required on all Type 1, 2, and 3 water; (measured from bankfull width of the channel or the upland edge of the Channel Migration Zone, whichever is greater); actual width and management opportunities are determined by mapped growing conditions (Site Class), measured stand composition, and approved results of a computerized growth and yield model. Based on current observed stand conditions, it is likely on the subject property; that no harvest would be permitted within a 105 to 128 foot RMZ under WAC 222 - 030 -021. The farce pond has been the focus of enhancement since at least the late 1980s. In 1997, Bill Bonsen of NRCS prepared specific engineering drawings for enlargement of the pond. These improvements were largely completed under an approved HPA in 2002- 2003. Resident fish (trout) have been introduce to the pond. The pond outlet is afish barrier. Future improvements may include creating a fish ladder at the site of the overflow spillway. Wildlife Habitat Acomplete wildlife inventory was not conducted as a part of this plan. The property contains upland forest habitat in mid -seral stages which is fairly characteristic of mesic sites in Whatcom County, The following wildlife species are typical of, though not necessarily widely distributed in, mature upland forested habitat in the Puget Sound lowlands and westside Cascade foothills, and may be present on the property during some portion of their life history-. Reptiles northern alligator lizard garter snakes Amphibians northwestern salamander Pacific giant salamander ereabna western redback salamander roughskm newt Pacific tree frog red - legged frog westem toad 20 Birds blue and ruffed grouse marbled mmrrelet . bald eagle accipter and buteo hawks owls: great homed, spotted, barred, red - breasted sapsucker northern saw -whet, northern pygmy common nighthawk woodpeckers: Pileated, hairy, downy, western flycatcher northern flickers rufous hummingbird violet -green and tree swallow Steller's and gray jay common raven American crow black- capped and chestnut backed chickadee red- breasted nuthatch goldencrowned and ruby crowned kinglet brown creeper winter wren American robin Townsend's solitaire varied thrush Swainson's thrush Hutton's and solitary vireo warblers: yellow - nunped, Townsend's, mfous -sided towbee hermit, Macgillivray's black - headed grosbeak sparrows: song, fox, white - crowned dark- eyedjumco brown - headed cowbird purple finch pine siskin American goldfinch eventng grosbeak Vaux's swift western tanager Mammals shrews: montane, Pacific, Towbridge's, coast mole vagrant, wandering, masked shrew -mole big brown bat silver - haired bat Douglas' squirrel northem flying squirrel Townsend's chipmunk mountain beaver voles: creeping, red tree, western red - backed, porcupine long tailed packrat deer mouse Pacific jumping mouse black bear grizzly bear raccoon weasel marten fisher striped skunk bobcat cougar blacktail deer snowshoe hair brush rabbit coyote In order to provide for future wildlife needs, in particular for those species dependent on vertical nesting and perching structures, Washington State regulations require retention of certain habitat features after timber harvest. Under WAC 222 -30 -020 (11), 3 green recruitment trees per acre, 10 inches or greater dbh and 30 feet or greater in height, must remain on the site after harvesting. In addition, 2 wildlife reserve trees, live or dead trees 10 inches or greater dbh and 12 feet or greater in height, must remain per acre if available. No point in a harvest area may be greater than 800 feet from agreen recruitment or wildlife reserve tree. Finally, 2 down logs per acre, at least 12 inches diameter and 20 feet in length, must remain on site after harvesting. The current conditions meet these minimum requirements for conifer snags and large downed logs. Landowners are encouraged to voluntarily leave additional green trees and snags standing, particularly within and around riparian areas and wetlands. 21 Threatened and Endangered Species There are no other TES Species documented by the WDNR TRAX system (January 2, 2003 map edition) impacting timber harvest on the property. The marbled murrelet is a Federal and State Threatened species.. The property does not contain Suitable Marble Murrelet Habitat, as defined in WAC 222 -16 -010, and is not within a Marbled Murrelet Detection Area (September, 2000 map edition). Under WAC 222 -16 -080 (1) 6) (vi), landowners of less than 500 acres meeting these conditions are exempt from regulation of harvest from this type of habitat. The Northern spotted owl is a Federal Threatened species and a State Endangered species. The Levorsen Family properties are not located within a Spotted Owl Special Emphasis Area (SOSEA), is not within 0.7 miles of a spotted owl site center, and does not appear to contain Suitable Spotted Owl Habitat, as defined in WAC 222 - 16-085 (1). Under WAC 222 -16 -080 (1) (h) (iv), landowner; of less than 500 acres meeting these conditions are exempt from State regulation of harvest from this type of habitat. A complete botanical inventory was not conducted as part of this plan. No Federal or State Threatened or Endangered plants are documented in the vicinity of the property by the DNR Natural Heritage Program (March 7, 1997 map edition). Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Strategies Over 400 species wildlife species are known to utilize . forested habitat in westem Washington. However, on any given acre only a fraction of this total is typically found at a given time. This, of course, is because the habitat requirements vary between species. In general, the greater the habitat diversity on that acre, the greater the number of wildlife species will be able to utilize it. Diversity in this context refers not only to the number of tree and understory plant species but also:. age and size classes of dominant vegetation; distribution of vegetation within a stand;: distribution of stands across the landscape; and presence of unique or uncommon "micro- habitats" (such as cliffs, natural openings, or certain wetlands). Timber harvest and wildlife habitat are not exclusive. In fact, not only can harvests be designed to have low impact on existing habitat, timber harvest is a critical tool to consider for creating habitat, in that it is the disturbance regime over which a landowner has the most control. The following are habitat features that a landowner can manipulate using timber harvest and/or other methods. Specific management strategies and activities which will benefit wildlife on the Levorsen Family properties are shown in bullet statements: consider these when implementing the management recommendations given in a later section. 22 Plant Species Composition: As with animals, different plant species have varying requirements which determine where they can survive and flourish. Given some information about the environmental characteristics of a relatively undisturbed site (climate, soils, position in the landscape) it is possible to predict with a degree of certainty which plant species will occur at a given point in time; this is a tenet of the theory of succession. Two strategies for increasing species diversity thus are: 1) introduce species which are suitable to the site but are currently absent; and, 2) maintain or create areas of different successional stages. Plant landings and inactive/retired road to a mix beneficial for wildlife: a 20 pound per acre application of 20 % perennial ryegrass, 20 % white Dutch clover, 20 % tall fescue, 15 % orchard grass, 15 % birdsfoot trefoil, and 10 % annual rye is recommended for sunny areas as a food source for deer and grouse. Planting should occur spring or early fall, to a mineral seedbed. When replanting following a regeneration harvest, include up to 60 % seedlings of species other than Douglas fir. Alternative planting compositions for conifer sites are: 40 % Douglas fir, 40 % western hemlock, and 20 % red cedar; 60 % DF, 20 % WH, 20 % RC; and 66% DF 34 % RC. Vegetative Structure: In the Puget Sound lowlands, the spatial distribution of plants within a given area is primarily a function of the disturbance history. In general, due to the prevalent logging systems of past decades -- though by no means in all cases - -the longer the time since the last disturbance, the greater the structural diversity within a forest stand, namely: a greater range of tree diameters and tree heights; a greater . proportion of shade tolerant and late successional species; and development of multiple canopy layers. Unequal allocation of resources among individual trees accounts for a broad diameter and height distribution, including in even -aged forests. Presence and growth of both shade intolerant and shade tolerant species allow canopy differentiation. The structure of stands, or timber types, on the property has been described earlier. Strategies for increasing structural diversity are: 1) maintain stands of different ages and/or successional stages; 2) provide conditions which yield the elements discussed above. When scheduling commercial thinning, consider a `variable- density" approach. htstead of uniformly thinning the stand, some areas are heavily thinned and other areas are lightly thinned. The exact dimensions are flexible: "heavily" can range from clearcut to 50 % canopy closure; `1&13 'can range from no removal to 50 % of the prescribed thinning density. A target distribution of h*eatments could be 60 % prescription density, 20 % heavily thinned, and 20 % lightly thinned; two patches each of heavily thinned and lightly thinned per acre are recommended. The `variable density" approach can also be applied to precommercial thinning. 23 Habitat Structures: These are biotic or abiotic components of forests which provide benefits to wildlife. Snags are standing dead or dying trees. Over 60 species of wildlife are known to reside in cavities in snags in western Washington. Different sizes and ages can accommodate different species: snags (including stumps) as small as 10 inches in diameter and feet in height are utilized by some bird species. Deformed live trees- - with broken tops, large branches, forks, and other physical defects - -can provide habitat to many species for nesting, perching, and foraging; often decay is associated with the defect. Large woody debris consists of portions of or entire fallen trees, logs, and root wads. Over 100 species of wildlife are ]mown to use large woody debris for nesting, foraging, hiding, and courtship; in addition, it plays an important role in providing fish habitat in most middle order streams. Abiotic habitat structures include cliffs, caves, talus, springs, seeps, wetlands, and watercourses; no such structures (other than wetlands, as described above) are present on the property. • When implementing harvests, snags and defective live trees should be retained, safety permitting. Snags can also be created during harvest, by: leaving high stumps (5 feet or higher); topping; or, girdling. Between 2 and 15 snags per acre are recommended. Cost sharing funds for voluntary snag creation may be available. • When implementing harvests, large woody debris, including tree tops and defective logs, should be retained throughout. 24 VI: CULTURAL RESOURCES A complete inventory of cultural and archeological resources was not conducted as part of this plan. The DNR TRAX system (January 2, 2003 map edition) does not record the presence of ]mown cultural resource sites on the subject property. 25 VII: AESTHETICS AND RECREATION The Levorsen Family properties are not accessible to the public, but is visible at close range from Douglas Road, a low - volume secondary road, and at a distance from various other secondary roads. The property provides the landowners with opportunities for dispensed recreation, hildng, and wildlife viewing. The owner wishes to utilize uneven -aged / selection harvest techniques in order to preserve these uses. The landowner may want to retain an unharvested visual buffer around the residential sites to help mitigate the aesthetic impact of timber harvest. 10 VIII: AGROFORESTRY, SPECLAL FOREST PRODUCTS, AND OTHER USES Forested areas have been used to supply firewood in the past. Removal has focused on mortality and defective trees.. Salvage for firewood will continue. Windthmwn merchantable trees have been salvaged to provide a source of lumber and timbers for personal use. A portable band saw has been hired as needed. A considerable volume of board (including cedar, maple, cherry, and cottonwood) is currently stockpiled for future use. The production of other specialty products is not contemplated at this time. 27 Resource Management Recommendations This section describes specific forest management practices to undertake to achieve the landowners' goals and objectives. A brief discussion is provided where appropriate. The reader may wish to acquire "The Woodland Workbook", an excellent resource which contains background information on many aspects of forest management and defines common forestry terms; it is available for a fee from Oregon State University Extension Service, Peary Hall 119, Corvallis, OR 97331 -5712, 541n37 -3700. It is recommended that the landowner consult with a professional forester prior to conducting specific practices, particular those recommended for later years, to determine their advisability in light of changing circumstances. 1) Consider selective harvest Types 1 and Jl in the next ten years. These stands exceed the average rotation age for hardwoods: rate of growth and value appreciation are declining. Although markets for most other species are soft, current hardwood prices are near historic highs; cottonwood is an exception, and it may be advisable to retain this species. Retain red cedar understory as feasible. Retain specimen bigleaf maple and generous buffers around house sites as desired . to mitigate aesthetic impacts. It is recommended that all hardwood trees in age classes older than 50 years (regardless of current diameter or quality) be removed in the near term. In order to maximize economy of scale, it is recommended that these areas be harvested as a single unit. It is specifically recommended that the owner confer with a tax advisor an d consulting forester to determine the best timing structure of a timber sale to qu minimize federal tax obligations. Following harvest, replant openings in Type 1 to conifer using plug +l stock at 435 trees per acre (see page 12 for detailed reforestation recommendations). Replant with red cedar (or genetically unproved 2-0 stock red alder):. conifer is recommended for appropriate sites to afford greater latitude for future uneven aged management. Monitor for brush competition and consider selective chemical application in September of year 1 or 2 in conifer areas. 2) Consider selective harvest Type 2 in the next ten years. It is recommended that all hardwood trees in age classes older than 50 years (regardless of current diameter or quality) be removed in the near term. In addition, thin areas of cedar to improve growth and forest health. In order to maximize economy of scale, it may be advisable to harvest with Types 1 and 2 as a single unit. Due to specific concerns of the landowner regarding damage to soils and residual trees, cut -to -length equipment (harvester and forwarder) is recommended. Following harvest, replant openings only to cedar (Douglas fir if greater than % acre) using plug+l stock at 435 trees per acre. Monitor for brush competition and consider selective chemical application in September of year 1 or 2 in replanted areas. 3) Schedule selective harvest about once per decade thereafter. Monitor markets and stand conditions to determine appropriate cutting strategies. Perform site preparation W and replant understocked areas following harvest. Monitor for brush competition and conduct brush control as needed. 4) Interplant Type 3,.2004. Due to the reported high water table lasting until June, deferring planting until as late as possible in the growing season (April or May) is recommended. Mortality in the western 1/3 (west of blue Ragging) should be replaced with Douglas fir. Mortality in the middle 1/3 should be replaced with red alder, Sitka spruce, or red cedar. Mortality in the obvious depressional areas in the eastern 1/3 should be replaced with red alder, Sitka spruce, or red cedar. It is recommended that all mortality in the remaining areas of the eastern 1/3 (east of red alder rows) be replaced with red cedar. Areas between rows should be mowed frequently during the summer. Roosting posts should be installed to encourage captors to perch and prey on small mammals. Herbicide applications (glyphosate) should not be made during the growing season due to the susceptibility of the tree species to severe damage. Rototilling should not be scheduled. A release application of glyphosate (Accord) and sulf nneturon methyl (Oust) should be considered once conifer buds are dormant for the season (probably mid- September); these should not be applied around alder seedlings. The Oust has some soil residual activity and will continue to control gemnnants the following spring. Monitor for thistles in summer, 2005: treat with Transline as needed. 5) Afforest Types 49 69 and J2, 2004 to 2006. Ideally, this area would be treated with a site preparation herbicide application the summer prior to planting: use Accord and Oust. Alternately, it may be possible to treat in spring a minimum of two weeks prior to planting (check product labels). Use extreme caution to avoid spray drift onto neighboring Timber Type 4 and active agricultural fields. Use of the blue seedling tubes is not recommended, as these probably double planting costs: deer browse does not appear to be aproblem. Due to the reported high water table lasting until June, deferring planting until as late as possible in the growing season (April or May) is recommended. Obvious depressional areas (Labounty soils) should be planted with Sitka spruce or red alder. It is recommended that remaining areas be planted with 2/3 Douglas £u, 1/3 red cedar: plug+l stock is recommended to increase survivorship. Distribute red cedar in two dimensions by staggering plantings: e.g., Row 1 DF, DF, RC, DF..., Row 2; DF, RC, DF, DF, ..., Row 3, RC, DF, DF, RC...). Planting I1 by 9 foot spacing should accommodate farm equipment and provide adequate density. Areas between rows should be mowed frequently during the summer if needed. Roosting posts should be installed to encourage raptors to perch and prey on small mammals. Herbicide applications ( glyphosate) should not be made during the growing season due to the susceptibility of the tree species to severe damage. Rototilling should not be scheduled. A release application should be considered once conifer buds are dormant for the season, as needed in years 1 and 2; these should not be applied around alder seedlings; low rates should be applied to avoid damage to red cedar. Monitor for thistles in years 1 and 2: treat with Transline as needed. 29 6) Afforest Type 5, 2004 to 2005. Ideally, this area would be treated with a site preparation herbicide application the summer prior to planting: use Accord. Alternately, it may be possible to treat in spring a minimum of two weeks prior to planting (check product labels). Use extreme - caution to avoid spray drift onto neighboring active agricultural fields. Use of the blue seedling tubes is not recommended, as these probably double planting costs: deer browse does not appear to be a problem. Due to the reported high water table lasting until June, deferring planting until as late as possible in the growing season (April or May) is recommended. It is recommended that this area be planted with red alder at 540 TPA (9 foot spacing): access for farm equipment will not be significant issue here. The owner also want to plant several rows of red cedar along the north side: not less than three rows are recommended to be an effective screen. Subsequent herbicide application is not anticipated. 7) Precommercial thin conifer areas Types 314, 6, and J2 at about age 15. Thin to about 300 TPA (9 by 15 foot spacing is closest). 8) Precommercial thin red alder areas Types 4, 5, 6 at about age .5 to 8. Thin to about 435 TPA (9 by 12 foot spacing is closest). Retain all available red cedar and Sitka spruce . above the target densities. 9) Precommercial thin red alder areas Types 4, 5, 6 at about age 12 to 16. Thin to about 300 TPA (9 by 15 foot spacing is closest but a creative approach will be necessary due to the constraints of planting on a grid): retain largest diameter and best formed trees. Retain all available red cedar and Sitka . spruce above the target densities. 10) Consider commercial thin conifer areas Types 3, 4, 6, and J2 at about age 25. Ship thin every third row. 11) Consider commercial thin conifer areas Types 3, 4, 6, and J2 at about age 35. 12) Clearcut harvest Type 5 at about age 35. 13) Clearcut harvest Types 3 and 4 as a single management unit at about age 45. 14) Manage Types 6 and J2 after age 35 on an uneven aged basis together with adjoining Types 1, 2, and Jl. L Management Timetable Summa- r Current Actions December, 2003: apply for transfer to DFL Spring, 2004: site prep, interplant Type 3 September, 2004: release spray Type 3 September, 2004: site prep Types 4, 5, 6, J2 Spring, 2005: plant Types 4, 5,.6, J2 Consider selective harvest Types 1, 2, J2 +5 Year Actions monitor for competing vegetation and animal damage, treat as necessary Precommercial thin alder areas Types 3, 45 51 61 J2 +15 Year Actions Consider selective harvest Types 1, 2, J2 Precommercial thin Types 3, 41 5, 6, J2 + 30 Year Actions Consider commercial thin conifer areas Types 3, 4, 6, and J2 Clearcut harvest Type 5 at about age 35 Clearcut harvest Types 3 and 4 as a single management unit at about age 45 31 Fiore 2: Detail of Whatcom County Assessor's map for Section 25, Township 39 North, Range 1 East, W. M., with Levorsen Family Tract (yellow) and proposed DFL area (green) indicated.. No Scale 33 7-w ♦ e ,N M° 7s SseA s �� • . M,• , .tom Y i M ? • WO 4W ' Y� •E� A vian O • {� Af Aw T Yw •bii S yiw ,.se 1 m 4M IM RIT® ,. _ 33 Fijwe 3: Timber type map for Levorsen Family properties. Scale:. 1 inch equals 400 feet - LFtiFMn _ 000cws xwo cb sm�c7�eE5 — �" Ra+DS O ❑ TIMW sI rF to Bw, Wy Q 3E� AKRS of INCiDEN�grEt ++�• 'rREES�N =r1-Wi JEb<X�ISSI '�-i S*RfAm, Sc.+iN4 IRE. rw WE(i'.�DS n WE 13 Ir (KSO) YYff TL TylE2 (A6) \ ipPE SI m Rny2 ry t tYp♦; I n4om tA3f9fbm (oroa , 7 N7E Kf/ (Ms D) i r cn Po +D hwc,) e � b - (J C� I 'C C ' 1YPE 2 _ ,Y (J 4 Awvr3 =rc N3om- d ryfF 8 DFOII >N=IW 2003$ A lYt� S KA Or*SrL*�) 34 Figure 4Torest Practice Activity Map Willi approximate location of Levorsen Family Tract indicated. Scale as shown. FOREST PRACTICE ACTIVITY MAP TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH HALF 0; RANGE 1 EAST (W M-) HALF 0. SECTION 26 3W3121!:n PM HD6 35 - � ,�� a-- < >° r - .. __r „ . `� f - � . .. t r � �. � �, LANDOWNER AE'FIRMATION We have read this Forest Land Management Plan of 37 pages prepared by John D. Gold of John Gold & Company, Consulting Foresters, January 2, 2004, covering our property in Whatcom County, and it reflects our management objectives. If the portions of the property described in the Plan are accepted for inclusion in a current use taxation and Stewardship Incentives programs, we agree to manage them consistent with the Plan and the standards of the programs to the best of our abilities. Lorren K. Levorsen for Date Leyor§en et al. S , Z00¢ WHATCOMCOUNTY APPROVAL (for DFLIOST programs only) I have reviewed this Plan and approve it as meeting the requirements of a Forest Land Management Plan as described in RCW 84.33.130. Print name and title: Date DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUCES APPROVAL (if applying for cost share funds only) I have reviewed this Plan and approve it as meeting the requirements of the Stewardship Incentives Program. Print name and title: Date PAID PREPARLR SIGNATURE No ' di du 'W other than those specifically acknowledged made significant wn �'b ti to this Plan. , r y J D. Id . i ate o 37 Oglesby Tracts OST 2004 WHA TCOM CO UNTY OPEN SPA CE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Erin Oglesby Designation: Open Space Timber 5560 West Avenue M Updated TMP Quartz Hill, CA. 93536 Parcel No.: 400205 - 098090, - 168040 Subarea: Lynden Nooksack Valley Parcel Acreage: 39.11 acres Comp. Plan Desig: Rural Acreage -in OST: approx 38 acres Zoning Desig.: R5A Road Access: Burk Road Shorelines: N/A Land Use: Homesite, forest land. Land Use History: Homesite and timber land. Soil TypefCapabilities: #179 - Whatcom slit loam, 3 - 8% stapes, 90% lot coverage Site Index* 116 - Douglas fir Urnitations/Cdrtcem Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness, seedling establishment, competing vegetation. #156 - Labounty silt loam, drained,#-2%slopes, 10% lot coverage Site Index* 90- Redalder LimitationslConcem Seasonal high water table, poorly drained soil. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0= incomplete; 1= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 2 See page 8 of TMP. Type 1: 30 acres - mod. stocked 70 - yr. old stand of hardwoods and conifers. Type 2:2.5 acres - mostly 55 yr. old Red alder. Type 3: 5.5 acres - mostly submemhantable Red alder. Soils Description 2 2 Complete. Forest Health 2 . 2 Appears relatively free of insect or pest problems. Some stem and butt rot present in coniferous timber. Harvest Plan 2 2 Several harvest options given, seepages 10 and i f of TMP. Thinning Program 2 2 Several post- harvest and commercial options given, see pages 12 and 13 of TMP. Planting/Restocking Program 2 2 Reforest by planting at a density sufficient to yield 190 1acre vigorous, well distributed seedlings, either Red alder, Douglas fir or Western red cedar as befits soil type. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 2 Maintaining a sustainable timber stand for wildlife habitat through good forest management. TOTAL: 14 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval *Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. Forest Land Management Plan Oglesby Tracts West Yz of the Southeast Y. of the Southwest ' /a and the East Y: of the Southwest Ye of the Southwest 1/4, Less County Roads, all in Section 5, Township 40 North, Range 2 East, W. M. Whatcom County, Washington Prepared for: Ms. Erin Oglesby 5560 West Avenue M Quartz Hill, CA 93536 Prepared by: John D. Cold John Gold & Company, Consulting Foresters 619 Commercial Avenue, Suite 25 Anacortes, WA 98221 (360) 299 - 8166 August 27, 2003 GOLD & COMPANY, 69Commercial Avenue 9JOHN CONSULTING FORESTERS Anacones, WA 9a221 TunUer Cmisin m d Appraisal Ph" 360.299.8166 Fax 360.588 1466 Tmrber Sale Ao'�ministraapn IForesmadManagement Email goldQlidalgo.nel Oglesby Tracts: in Section 5, T 40 N, R 2 E Inspected by: John D. Gold Date of inspection: August 25, 2003 Tax Account Nos.: 400205- 168040 -0000 and 400205- 098090 -0000 Current assessment status: 400205- 098090 -0000, Open Space - Timber 1981; 400205 - 168040 -0000 (8.0 of 9.55 acres), Open Space- Timber 1998; 400205- 168040 -0000 (1.55 of 9.55 acres), highest and best use Gross area: 39.11 acres Forested area: 38 acres +/-2 Area suitable for OST status: 37.56 acres; The purpose of this Forest Land Management Plan is to serve as a multi- resource planning document in support of continued enrollment as Open Space - Timber land (OST) in Whatcom County as prescribed in RCW 84.34 following a change in ownership. It is also intended to be suitable in support of application for inclusion in 1) the Forest Stewardship Plan Reimbursement Program (FSPRP) and/or the Stewardship Incentives Program (SIP) as administered by the Washington Department of Natural Resources and/or 2) the Forestry Incentives Program (FIP) as administered by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. It is intended to guide the landowners in long -term management of their forested and nonforested acreage in Whatcom County. In keeping with the dynamic nature of both forest systems and the planning process, it is expected that this Plan will be reviewed periodically and revised, if necessary, to reflect changing conditions. Previous written planning efforts which this Plan builds upon and incorporates by reference include: • Management Plan Update for Amy Burk Unger (September, 1997) by Gale Meyer, USDA (Parcel 400205- 168040 -0000 only); • Forest Management Plan (March 23, 1983) by S. Meacham, WDNR Previous written planning efforts which are acknowledged but which were not available in their entirety of this writing include: • Woodland Plan (1981) by Peggy Olds, USDA; • Timber Cruise Report (November 1, 1980) by Lusignan Forestry, Inc. (five parcels comprising the Estate of Mary Burk totaling approximately 347 acres). Source: Whatcom County Assessor's Office records. Excludes areas cleared for residential use. Excludes the 1.55 acre building site in 400205- 168040 -0000 reserved in the 1998 OST application. Note that approximately 0.55 additional acres could be suitable for OST status. The OST program is designed by statute to preserve the current use of property. The RC Ws specifically provide that an OST property be contiguous ownership of one or more parcels of five acres or greater which is devoted "primarily to the growth and harvest of forest crops for commercial purposes ". The Open Space Program is also targeted at providing benefits from forest areas including: 1) the conservation or enhancement of natural, cultural or scenic resources; 2) the protection of wetlands and natural shorelines; 3) the protection of soil resources and unique or critical wildlife and native plant habitats; 4) the promotion of conservation principles and educational opportunities, and; 5) enhancement of the value of adjacent natural areas, sanctuaries and open spaces. A complete Forest Land Management Plan is essential to supporting new enrollments in Whatcom County's OST Programs. Because of the unique features of the Oglesby property, it is an excellent candidate for inclusion in the OST Program. SIP/FSPRP is a federally funded program intended to provide financial incentives to non- industrial private forest landowners to "manage their property using an integrated multi - resource approach." Cost - sharing for specified land management practices is available, as determined on a case -by -case basis, on properties between 20 and 1,000 acres. An approved Forest Stewardship Plan is required to access cost -share funds towards these practices. FIP is a federal program intended to share the cost of reforestation and timber stand improvement, on non - industrial private forest land properties between 10 and 5,000 acres. An acceptable Forest Management Plan is required to access cost -share funds towards these practices. The Oglesby property is an excellent candidate for inclusion in the Stewardship Incentives Program and Forestry Incentives Program. General Property Description The Oglesby property is located about six miles southeasterly of the City of Blaine, in northern Whatcom County (aerial photograph, Figure 1). It is a square shaped, 40 acre property, approximately %4 mile wide, at the widest points.` The property consists of two adjoining parcels. The property is bounded to the south by Burk Road (paved, County). A short internal mad serves as a driveway. A single family residence with associated outbuildings and landscaping is present in the south -central portion of the property. No other improvements were noted during field inspection. No authoritative survey monumentation was recovered. The center 1/16 comer of the SW %4 Section 5 (midpoint of north property line) may have been recently set: the north- south centerline of the SE %4 is blazed blue on the adjoining property to the north. A painted lath was noted in the approximate location of the south 1/16 comer of the SW %4 Section 5 (midpoint of south property line). The adjoining property to the west and north was clearcut in about 2000 and the cutting lines are assumed to roughly coincide with the common property lines. 4 Distances and acreages cited in this report we approximations only. No member of this fnn is a licensed land surveyor in the State of Washington and no survey was performed or recorded in the preparation of these reports; an independent land survey would authoritatively reveal lot dimensions and acreage. Maps, sketches, figures, and exhibits contained herein were prepared using field rusuatuments, aerial photography, and other sources; they are intended only to aid the reader in visualizing the property described herein; relative sizes and positions of features are approximations only. Land Use History The general vicinity of the Oglesby property is characterized by predominantly twenty acre and larger lot sizes with mixed use. In general, larger lots tend to support agricultural or forestry use. In general, smaller lots tend to be one acre to ten acres, with rural residential use. Many other nearby properties are enrolled in various current use assessment programs. The current land use on the Oglesby property is forestry with a single family residence. Land use on the property has historically been forestry. The property has been held by various generations of the Burk family since settlement. The Oglesby property was likely first harvested by clearcut between about 1900 and 1930; some residual low value trees were retained. Subsequent selective harvest for personal and/or commercial use likely occurred from about 1950 to 1980. At the time of disposition of the Estate of Mary Burk in 1981 the Oglesby property (then a portion of the 136 acre "Homestead Parcel ") contained approximately 310 MBF of merchantable timbers; the property was characterized as about 50 % stocked and previously high gradeds. In 1983 -1984, selective harvest was conducted on the Oglesby property (and other Estate of Mary Burk parcels) under agreement with Manke Lumber Company (Forest Practice Application 1905885, approved August 5, 1983); volume removed is not documented, but based on current conditions was likely about 50 % of the conifer inventory. A previously cleared portion of the property was allowed to revert from pasture to forest in about 1990; natural regeneration by red alder was largely successful. Some selective harvest was reportedly conducted in 1995. About 10 acres were selectively harvested in about 2000, likely in conjunction with harvest of the adjoining property to the west and north (formerly a portion of the 136 acre "Homestead Parcel "); removal appears to have been principally higher grade cedar and alder in the southern portions of the property. The Oglesby property was acquired by the present owner Jane 13, 2003, from Amy Burk Unger, who had acquired it in 1981 from Mary Burk. No grazing is currently practiced r Source: 1980 Lusigtan report. c Source: 1983 Meacbamplan. Landowner Goals 1) To reduce the cost of long term forest land ownership by maintaining the property- - which is devoted to the long term growth and harvest of commercial forest products - -in a current use tax assessment program. 2) To practice good forest stewardship and resource conservation by managing the forested acreage in an ecologically sustainable manner. Practices will reduce the risk of catastrophic loss from fire, wind, disease, and insects. 3) To generate income from the sustainable harvest of commercial forest products and to schedule harvests primarily as the need for income arises. Continued reliance on uneven aged management / selective harvest techniques is a specific goal of the current landowner. Resource Inventory This section describes current resource conditions, some appropriate management alternatives, and relevant regulatory requirements. The eight resource categories conform to the requirements of the Stewardship Incentives Program. I: TIMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS Existine Veeetation Approximately 38 acres of the Oglesby property are currently forested. The non - forested areas are devoted to a single family residence. The forested portions of the property contain mixed age hardwoods and conifers, with the majority of merchantable volume averaging 50 to 70 years. Three timber types/management compartments, based on age, stocking, operational considerations, and past management history were identified from aerial photography and on -site inspection. These are shown in Figure 3 and described in greater detail below. Understory vegetation is fairly typical of lowland sites in northern Whatcorn County. A vigorous and diverse shrub layer includes the following species: salmonberry, elderberry, red huckleberry, and vine maple. The herbaceous layer commonly contains swordfem, bracken fem, stinging nettles, and trailing blackberry. Low lying areas contain hardback, skunk cabbage, lady fem, and slough sedge. Evergreen and Himalayan blackberry, invasive weeds which likely became established following harvesting, are present in areas of low overstory stocking. Timber Type 1 (approximately 30 acres) is a moderately stocked stand of 70 year old hardwoods and conifers. Stocking and species distribution is highly variable within this stand, reflecting the history of selective harvesting. Three principal age classes are present: 70 to 100 years; 30 to 50 years; and 5 to 15 years. Western hemlock, paper birch, bigleaf maple, and red alder are most highly represented in the 70 year age class; Douglas fir, though a small component of total merchantable volume, is almost entirely of this age class. Red cedar and western hemlock are most highly represented in the 30 to 50 year age class, in the form of released understory saplings to small trees; some areas of red alder are also present in this class. The 5 to 15 year age class consists of small areas of hardwoods established following selective harvest entries; there are also some released understory red cedar in this class; reportedly Douglas fir was planted in some areas following those entries, but very few seedlings appear to have survived to the present time. Site Index? averages about 105, or mid- Site Class' III. Estimated basal ' Site Index is a measure of growing potential. Its value is the predicted height of a free - growing tree of a given species at given age. Unless otherwise stated, all references to Site Index herein are based on a Douglas fir 50 year curve. ' Site Class is a generalized measure of growing conditions for naturally forested areas, where "r' is excellent and "NP' is not area? averages about 60 percent of normal basal area for stands of this site and age.10 Merchantable volume is estimated to be about 12 MBF per acre.11 Growth rate is moderate and is estimated to currently average about 0.8 to 0.9 MBF per acre per yea. 12 Timber Type 2 (approximately 2.5 acres) is a moderately well stocked stand of nearly pure red alder. This type originated in about 1950. Soils here have restricted drainage and this would be considered a hardwood site. Site Index for red alder is estimated to average about 90, or Site Class III. Merchantable volume is estimated to be about 10 to 15 MBF per acre. Growth rate is moderately slow, and declining, and is estimated to currently average about 0.3 to 0.4 MBF per acre per year. Timber Type 3 (approximately 5.5 acres) is a well stocked stand of nearly pure, submerchantable red alder. Some poorly stocked areas of brush are present, occupying about 10 % of the area. This type was previously cleared for agricultural uses, though there are scattered residual trees; the current stand originated in the late 1980's and averages about 13 years at breast height. As measured from juvenile growth, Site Index fore red alder averages about 100, or low Site Class II. However, it appears that a hardpan is present, which may restrict height growth in later decades: actual Site Index is likely similar to Type 2. Growth rate in most areas is excellent. Timber Volume 13 By ocular estimate, the property contains about 400 to 450 MBF of merchantable timber, with an approximate species distribution of.. 10 % Douglas fir, 10 % red cedar, 20 % hemlock, 30 % red alder, and 30 % other hardwoods. Exclusive of riparian buffers and other leave trees required under current regulations, an estimated 200 MBF could be legally recovered. The current market value of this timber (as stumpage) is likely in the range $ 100,000 to 150,000. 9 Basal area is one measwe of tree density (integrating size and spacing), and is typically expressed in square feet per acre. Trees per acre is a measure of density which is independent of individual tree size. 10 Determined from Table 1 in: Charles J. Chambers (1989) Empirical growth and yield tables for the Douglas fir zone. � � Note that no timber cruise was performed in the preparation of these reports and volumes shown are ocular estimates only. A timber cruise is recommended if an accurate estimate of volume is required. it For comparison's sake, annual growth for a fully stocked natural stand of the same age would average about 1.3 MBF per acre; mean annual increment in a managed stand would typically be 10 to 20 % higher. rr Figures in this section are rough estimates only. A timber cruise and appraisal is recommended if an accurate value estimate is required. Such an assessment, with an effective date of June 13, 2003, is strongly recommended in order to establish the timber basis; proper documentation of basis can result in significant federal tax savings at the time of limber harvest. Character of Timber Douglas Fir: primarily 70 year old residuals. Moderately rough and limby, with below average form and frequently crooked boles. Old snowbreak is common at 30 to 50 feet. Other conifer: average quality small to medium sawtimber and chip- and -saw, with 2 logs; some older timber in the northern portion of the property, generally defective Hardwoods: most of the merchantable volume is mature to overmature sawtimber, with old weather damage and red heart fairly common; younger age classes are average to good surface quality. General Timber Management Strategies Timber harvest. The property contains mature timber, which is of an age considered economically optimal for harvest. The following silvicultural options are available: Clearcut harvest. This entails removal of all merchantable timber, excluding required leave trees, from the property in a single operation. In addition, typically all unmerchantable and noncommercial trees are cut. This technique has the advantage that it often best prepares the site for establishing a new stand of Douglas fir or red alder, which, being relatively shade - intolerant species, require conditions of full sunlight and minimal competition from residual trees and shrubs; this technique generally has the lowest logging costs. Disadvantages on this site would include: aesthetic concerns; and, elimination of wildlife habitat for species requiring a closed or partially closed canopy. Reforestation would be required. 2. Seed tree or shelterwood regeneration harvest. These entail retention of 5 to 30 trees per acre, evenly spaced across the harvested area; typically the leave trees are healthy, vigorous dominants or codomhtants. As with clearcut harvest, the goal is the initiation of a new age class of trees. Following seedling establishment, residual overstory trees should be reduced to no more than 12 per acre. These techniques are not frequently used in lowland Puget Sound forests, but are suited to some sites in Whatcom County. The advantages on the property would include: aesthetic concerns; and retention of wildlife habitat for species requiring a closed or partially closed canopy. Disadvantages on this site would include: a severe risk of windthrow due to soil conditions; somewhat higher logging costs; can be difficult to implement in small (less than 5 acre) units; the invasion by brush species following harvest; and, lack of desirable leave trees in the current stand. Artificial reforestation would likely be required. 3. Commercial thinning. This entails removing a fraction of the merchantable trees, leaving the site near fully stocked; on this site, a residual basal area of about 110 ft per acre would be appropriate for pure conifer stands. Thinning can also be perforated to a residual density or spacing: Table 1 provides a means to determine appropriate spacing figures at different stages in the rotation. Removal typically focuses on trees that are: less vigorous; in lower canopy positions; poorly spaced; defective; or otherwise undesirable. The goal is to reduce competition for light, water, and nutrients and redirect these resources to the healthier, most vigorous, and most desirable trees. Disadvantages on this site would include: a moderate risk of windthrow due to soil conditions; and higher logging costs. Commercial thinning is not appropriate for the current stand. Reforestation would not be required. 10 Table 1: Parameters for use in determining commercial thinning specifications: starting with known stand diameter (from cruise data) or stand age determine an average post - thinning spacing by interpolation for a target residual basal area. Approximate Equivalent Terms for Average Stand Age of Stand Corresponding a Basal Area/Acre After Thinning of: Diameter" After to Average Stand Diameter 80 feet' 120 feet Thinning Unnunaged15 Managed' TPA" Spacing ° TPA Spacing 8 26 25 230 14 345 11 10 41 31 147 17 220 14 12 54 37 102 21 153 17 14 67 43 75 24 113 20 16 80 47 57 28 86 23 18 94 54 45 31 68 25 20 107 59 37 34 56 28 22 120 65 30 38 45 31 4. Selection harvest/uneven aged management. This entails removal of individual or small groups of trees; traditionally this technique has been used to remove only the largest and most valuable trees (referred to as bighgrading), but many other scenarios are possible. In order for uneven aged management to be successful, in the sense of achieving maximum productivity and maintaining a healthy forest, intensive stand tending is required in addition to periodic harvest of the older trees. To do so requires - -at each and every harvest entry-- stocking control (precommercial or commercial thinning) in each age cohort, adequate control of competing vegetation and animal damage in youngest cohorts (generally less than 15 years), and initiation of a new age class of desirable species (for this stand, Douglas fir or red alder). It is worth noting that previous selective harvests failed to regenerate more than a token component of Douglas fir: in theory Douglas fir requires an opening at least 1/4 to 1/2 acre in size or a residual canopy of less than 30 trees per acre (approximately 40 foot spacing). In actual practice, it is difficult to manage for Douglas fir in openings less than several acres on most sites. Harvest entries in the 1990s resulted in the establishment of very little regeneration of any species: in the future, to insure a promptly and fully occupied site, artificial reforestation is recommended, though not required by law. Harvests could average once per decade. Harvest must include, if not focus on, the types of trees discussed above under commercial thinning; if it does not, growth and 14 Quadratic mean diameter at breast height (dbh, 4.5 feet above ground level) for trees 7.0 inches and greater. 1° Interpolated from Table 5 in Charles 1. Chambers (1989) Empirical growth and Yield tables for the Douglas £n zone. Site Index 110, PNBA =100%. 16 Assumes a program of regular light commercial thinning harvests resulting in sustained radial growth of 6 rings per inch. Note that growth patterns differ between managed and unmanaged stands, between different ruanagement strategies, and vary according to initial planting density and species, and . Trees per acre. IE Square spacing (e.g., 14' x 14') to the nearest whole foot. productivity of the stand will decline over time. Advantages of uneven aged management for this site include: retention of closed canopy conditions over most areas at any given time. Disadvantages on this site would include: possible residual stand of lower vigor and value; lower rate of return; if not properly applied does not create suitable conditions for regeneration by shade intolerant species; a high risk of windthrow due to soil conditions; invasion by brush species following harvest; and higher logging costs (can be partially offset by a higher average delivered log value). This type of harvest system is very difficult- - if not impossible - -to implement in an ecologically sustainable manner in most forest types of western Washington. General post harvest management activities: Assumes regeneration harvest has occurred: Site preparation. At the conclusion of harvest activities, slash should be abated to facilitate reforestation and reduce hazard of wildfire. Appropriate techniques, in descending order, for this site include: pile and burn, lop and scatter, and pile only. If reforestation does not occur within the first year after harvest, treatment of competing vegetation may be necessary: chemical treatment would be preferred to mechanical. Reforestation. Under WAC 222- 34 -010, reforestation is required within three years of completion of regeneration harvest activities; planting must be at a density sufficient to yield 190 vigorous, undamaged, well distributed seedlings of commercial species per acre after the second growing season. Parameters appropriate to this site are 435 seedlings per acre; planting should occur in the first season after harvesting, typically late winter to early spring Soil conditions observed on the Oglesby property suggest that about 20 to 30 % of the area are not especially well drained. These areas tend to have an understory of youth - on -age and lady fern, in contrast with drier microsites which have an understory of swordfern and trailing blackberry; less -well drained microsites do not have an abundance of old growth conifer stumps, although it is possible portions of the property were cleared following initial logging. On less -well drained microsites, replanting red cedar or red alder is recommended. On drier microsites, replanting Douglas fir is recommended. Planting of shade intolerant species (Douglas fir and red alder) is not recommended for openings less than several acres; small openings should be planted with shade tolerant species (hemlock for drier microsites, red cedar for any location). Control of animal damage. In early yens of seedling establishment deer browsing can be a problem; deer sign is plentiful but browsing by deer was not noted to be a problem in nearby plantations. It is probably best addressed by initial planting of vigorous stock at a high density; once the leader of young trees exceeds about 5 feet in height the browsing becomes less significant. Bud caps, seedling tubes, and/or 12 scented repellent may be necessary to avoid damage and mortality and grow the trees to this height. Adequate site preparation will help to control populations of rabbits and small mammals. The site should be surveyed annually until seedlings are approximately 6 feet to determine extent of browsing damage. Control of competing vegetation. On the property there is moderate to severe risk of invasion by brushy species and hardwoods. In addition, bigleaf maple and cottonwood stumps can be expected to sprout prolifically. The site should be surveyed at least annually until two to five years after harvesting to determine nature and extent of competing vegetation. Chemical or mechanical control should be used as appropriate; it is likely at least one, and possibly more than two treatments will be required to ensure successful establishment of a new conifer stand. Of particular note, blackberry species are likely to be a problem. These species should be chemically controlled prior to becoming well established. Precommercial thinning. This treatment may be considered about 10 to 15 years after seedling establishment in conifer types; it should be first applied about 5 to 8 years after establishment in alder types. It is ideally performed at the point of crown closure, so as to transfer resources from the less vigorous to more vigorous saplings. Properly applied, it can substantially increase the production of merchantable timber, and from an economic standpoint, this technique is well suited to more productive sites. Commercial thinning. This treatment may be performed starting at about age 25 and subsequently up to every five to fifteen years thereafter until final harvest. In order to maximize yield and economic return over the rotation, removal should focus on trees that are: in lower canopy positions; less vigorous; in smallest diameter classes; and defective or otherwise undesirable. Residual basal area after each thinning, regardless of age of stand, should be about 100 to 110 ft' for conifer stands on this site. Hardwood stands are generally not commercially thinned in the Pacific Northwest. Final harvest. If planted Douglas fir stands have no intermediate treatments, i.e., precommercial or commercial thinnings, and assuming management typical of most small landowners, yield of even aged stands can be expected to be about 18 MBF per acre if harvested at an economic maturity of 50 years. Assuming intensive management, yield could be increased to up to 23 MBF per acre at age 50.19 If the stand has regular light thinnings, economic maturity may be extended to well over 100 years, depending on management regime and rate -of -retum expectation. Unmanaged hardwood stands can be expected to yield about 7 to 14 M 3F per acre at age 40 to 50.20 From Table 9 in Charles S. Chambers (1989) Empirical growth and yield tables for the Douglas fir zone. '0 Interpolated from Table 6 in Charles J. Chambers (1992) EEm irical yield tables for predominantly alder stands in Western Washington. 13 II: FOREST HEALTH The property appears relatively free from insect and fungal pathogens. Some stem and butt rot is present in older conifer, particularly in association with older weather damage, within expectation for this age of timber. Rots detract from the quantity and quality of recoverable wood products; they can also lead to windthrow or direct mortality. Root and butt rots spread through inter -tree root contact; some causal fungi can persist in stumps and dead roots for decades. Red alder and paper birch are naturally short lived species which typically begin to decline at about age 60. Losses of timber quality and quantity can be quite rapid and severe at advanced ages. It is advisable to harvest hardwood stands prior to this point. Weather damage dating to the mid 1950s and associated rot is fairly common in the older hardwoods. Competition from brush is a serious concern on the property. Most brush species present in the understory of existing stands are capable of vigorous sprouting from root systems and can dominate harvested areas if not treated: This can result in significant growth losses and mortality of planted conifers. Principal brush species of concern are: salmonberry, blackberry, and vine maple. As noted above, Japanese knotweed and butterfly bush are also of concern for this site. Himalayan, evergreen, and trailing blackberry has potential to invade the site. Competing hardwood tree species of concern are: cottonwood, birch, bigleaf maple, and alder. Herbaceous vegetation is also likely to be a significant competitor. 14 III: SOILS AND LOGGING CONDITIONS The property occupies uplifted glaciomarine drift plains; elevations range from about 190 to 220 feet above sea level (topographic map, Figure 4). The property has slopes averaging less than 10 % with generally westerly aspects. Soils are classified as Labounty silt loams, Whatcom silt learns, and Whatcom - Labounty silt loam complex (map types 949 179, and 182, respectively, in Figure 5)." The Whatcom soils underlie most of the forested acres which are available for harvest. The Whatcom soils, formed in a mixture of loess and volcanic ash over glaciomarine drift, are very deep, moderately drained, with moderately slow permeability; they typically exhibit a seasonal high water table December through April at a depth of 18 to 36 inches. The Labounty soils occupy depressional areas and are considered hydric in Whatcom County. Labounty soils, formed in glaciomarine drift with an admixture of loess and volcanic ash, are very deep, poorly drained, with moderate permeability above the drift and slow permeability below; they typically exhibit a seasonal high water table November through May at a depth of 18 to 36 inches, and may support wetlands. The property has previously been harvested using ground methods. Old skid trails are apparent throughout. In the future, operation of ground equipment should be restricted to the dry season to prevent rutting and soil compaction. Rubber tired or tracked skidders would be acceptable; shovel equipment would be most suitable to prevent soil damage. However, in most selective harvest situations, shovel equipment would not be preferred in order to avoid damage to residual trees. Selective harvest should be avoided April to June during sap flow, also in order to avoid excessive damage to residual trees. The property is served from Burk Road only by a short driveway. The 2000 harvest mostly relied on a gravel road located on the (now) adjoining property (formerly a portion of the "Homestead Parcel'); this road was reconstructed in 1999 for harvest purposes. Construction of a short internal spur is recommended in order to keep future harvest operations separate from the residential area. For other than dry season use, forest roads will require surfacing; inclusion of Typar in the road design would likely reduce the required volume of surfacing material. A source of suitable rock for road construction was not noted on the property. Under RCW 76.09, many forest practices, including certain timber harvest and road construction projects, require advance application to - -and approval by - -the Washington Department of Natural Resources (:)NR). A complete Forest Practices Application (FPA) includes a description of the proposed project and the affected environment, as well as documentation of compliance measures with all applicable forest practices rules (WAC 222). The FPA is reviewed by DNR, as well as any other federal, State, and local " Unless otherwise noted, descriptions of soils contained herein are based on USDA Soil Survey (1992) Soil Survey of Whatcom County Area Washineton. A complete site - specific soil survey was beyond the scope of tlds investigation, and was not performed in the preparation of this report. 15 agencies with jurisdiction. Per WAC 222 -24 -051, a complete Road Maintenance and Abandonment Plan (RMAP) covering all Forest Roads on the contiguous ownership would be required as a condition of FPA approval; RMAP covering all Forest Roads on forest lands within the State would be required within one year or no later than December 31, 2005. Road maintenance requirements are unrelated to tax status or zoning, and apply to all forest land owners. Potentially Unstable Soils None were noted on the subject property. IC The Forest Practices Activity Map for the vicinity (Figure 4) indicates no surface waters or wetlands. Site inspection indicates that wetlands are present; note that stream ratings shown on the Activity Map are interim, and subject to revision according to actual field conditions (sce Section V for additional discussion). Wetlands are defined (Corps of Engineers, 1957; Washington State Department of Ecology, 1997) as areas which "are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal cimumslances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" and include swamps, bogs, fens, and marshes. Wetlands can be identified by the presence of characteristic vegetation, soils, and hydrology. Wetlands, though fairly common in glacially modified landscaped such as the Puget trough, are recognized to provide significant and often unique functions within the ecosystem, including storm- and flood- water storage, water quality improvement, groundwater exchange, and biological habitat support. Because of the features and functions of wetlands, land management activities in their immediate environs may be regulated under local, State, and/or federal law. Forest Practices in and near wetlands -- including timber harvest, road construction, site preparation, and chemical application- -are specifically regulated under Washington law. Small Forested Wetlands are present in depressional areas throughout the property. Certain Forested Wetlands in the south central and north central portions of the property appear to contain standing water much of the year, although all were dry at the time of inspection. It is likely harvest would be permitted in the forested wetlands on the Oglesby property, with limitations on the timing of operation and types of equipment. A non - forested Type A Wetland is present mostly off -site and immediately north of the property. At least a portion of this wetland appears to be perennially inundated and it is likely tributary to the North Fork Dakota Creek; as such, fish habitat may be present (see Section V for more complete discussion). Based on inspection of historic aerial photography, the extent o this wetland appears to have expanded since 1974, likely a result of beaver activity. Harvest from an average width 50 foot buffer strip around Type A Wetlands is restricted. 17 V: FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INCLUDING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Fish Habitat The subject property is within the Dakota Creek drainage. Note that Whatcom County has designated the entire Drayton Harbor watershed, including Dakota Creek, as a Water Resource Special Management Area and Stormwater Special District. Dakota Creek and its tributaries have been designated as habitat for the Puget Sound Chinook Evolutionarily Significant Unit, listed as Threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act. A non - forested Type A Wetland presumed tributary to Dakota Creek are present near the north boundary of the Oglesby property (see Section IV). The inundated area of this wetland likely meets the definition of a Type 3 (potentially fish bearing) water based on physical criteria. A Riparian Management Zone (RMZ) is required on all Type 1, 2, and 3 waters (measured from bankfull width of the channel or the upland edge of the Channel Migration Zone, whichever is greater); actual width and management opportunities are determined by mapped growing conditions (Site Class), measured stand composition, and approved results of a computerized growth and yield model. Based on current observed stand conditions, it is likely on the subject property, that no barvest would be permitted within a 105 to 128 foot RMZ under WAC 222 - 030 -021. Wildlife Habitat A complete wildlife inventory was not conducted as a part of this plan. The property contains upland forest habitat in mid -seral stages which is fairly characteristic of mesic sites in Whatcom County. The following wildlife species are typical of, though not necessarily widely distributed in, mature upland forested habitat in the Puget Sound lowlands and westside Cascade foothills, and may be present on the property during some portion of their life history: Birds blue and ruffed grouse marbled murrelet bald eagle accipter and buteo hawks owls: great homed, spotted barred, red - breasted sapsucker northern saw -whet, northern pygmy common nighthawk woodpeckers: pileated, hairy, downy, western flycatcher northern flickers rufous hummingbird violet -green and tree swallow Steller's and gmyjay, common raven American crow black- capped and chestnut backed chickadee red- breasted nuthatch golden - crowned and ruby crowned kinglet brown creeper winter wren American robin Townsend's solitaire varied thrush Swainson's thrush Hutton's and solitary vireo warblers: yellow - ramped, Townsend's, rufous -sided towhee M hermit, Macgillivray's black- headed grosbeak sparrows: song, fox, whitecrowaed dark - eyedjunco browv- headed cowbird purple finch pine siskin American goldfinch evening grosbeak Vaux's swift western tanager mountain beaver Reptiles porcupine northern alligator lizard garter snakes Amphibians Pacific jumping mouse northwestern salamander Pacific giant salamander ensatim western redback salamander roughskin newt Pacific tree frog red - legged frog westem mad Mammals shrews: montane, Pacific, Towbridge's, coast mole vagrant, wandering, masked shrew -role big brown bat silver -haired bat Douglas' squirrel northern flying squirrel Townsend's chipmunk mountain beaver voles: creeping, red tree, western red - backed, porcupine long tailed packrat deer mouse Pacific jumping mouse black bear grizzly bear raccoon weasel marten fisher striped skunk bobcat cougar blacktail deer snowshoe ham brush rabbit coyote In order to provide for future wildlife needs, in particular for those species dependent on vertical nesting and perching structures, Washington State regulations require retention of certain habitat features after timber harvest. Under WAC 222 -30 -020 (11), 3 green recruitment trees per acre, 10 inches or greater dbh and 30 feet or greater in height, must remain on the site after harvesting. In addition, 2 wildlife reserve trees, live or dead trees 10 inches or greater dbh and 12 feet or greater in height, must remain per acre if available. No point in a harvest area may be greater than 800 feet from a green recruitment or wildlife reserve tree. Finally, 2 down logs per acre, at least 12 inches diameter and 20 feet in length, must remain on site after harvesting. The current conditions meet these minimum requirements for conifer snags and large downed logs. Landowners are encouraged to voluntarily leave additional green trees and snags standing, particularly within and around riparian areas and wetlands. 19 Threatened and Endangered Species There are no other TES Species documented by the WDNR TRAX system (January 2, 2003 map edition) impacting timber harvest on the property. The marbled murrelet is a Federal and State Threatened species. The property does not contain Suitable Marble Murrelet Habitat, as defined in WAC 222 -16 -010, and is not within a Marbled Murrelet Detection Area (September, 2000 map edition). Under WAC 222 -16 -080 (1) 0) (vi), landowners of less than 500 acres meeting these conditions are exempt from regulation of harvest from this type of habitat. The Northern spotted owl is a Federal Threatened species and a State Endangered species. The property is not located within a Spotted Owl Special Emphasis Area (SOSEA), is not within 0.7 miles of a spotted owl site center, and does not appear to contain Suitable Spotted Owl Habitat, as defined in WAC 222 -16 -085 (1). Under WAC 222 -16 -080 (1) (h) (iv), landowners of less than 500 acres meeting these conditions are exempt from State regulation of harvest from this type of habitat. A complete botanical inventory was not conducted as part of this plan. No Federal or State Threatened or Endangered plants are documented in the vicinity of the property by the DNR Natural Heritage Program (March 7, 1997 map edition). Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Strategies Over 400 species wildlife species are known to utilize forested habitat in western Washington. However, on any given acre only a fraction of this total is typically found at a given time. This, of course, is because the habitat requirements vary between species. In general, the greater the habitat diversity on that acre, the greater the number of wildlife species will be able to utilize it. Diversity in this context refers not only to the number of tree and understory plant species but also: age and size classes of dominant vegetation; distribution of vegetation within a stand; distribution of stands across the landscape; and presence of unique or uncommon "micro- habitats" (such as cliffs, natural openings, or certain wetlands). Timber harvest and wildlife habitat are not exclusive. In fact, not only can harvests be designed to have low impact on existing habitat, timber harvest is a critical tool to consider for creating habitat, in that it is the disturbance regime over which a landowner has the most control. The following are habitat features that a landowner can manipulate using timber harvest and/or other methods. Specific management strategies and activities which will benefit wildlife on the Oglesby property are shown in bullet statements: consider these when implementing the management recommendations given in a later section. i Plant Species Composition: As with animals, different plant species have varying requirements which determine where they can survive and flourish. Given some information about the environmental characteristics of a relatively undisturbed site (climate, soils, position in the landscape) it is possible to predict with a degree of certainty which plant species will occur at a given point in time; this is a tenet of the theory of succession. Two strategies for increasing species diversity thus are: 1) introduce species which are suitable to the site but are currently absent; and, 2) maintain or create areas of different successional stages. Plant landings and inactive/retired road to a mix beneficial for wildlife: a 20 pound per acre application of 20 % perennial ryegrass, 20 % white Dutch clover, 20 % tall fescue, 15 % orchard grass, 15 % birdsfaot trefoil, and 10 % annual rye is recommended for sunny areas as a food source for deer and grouse. Planting should occur spring or early fall, to a mineral seedbed. When replanting following a regeneration harvest, include up to 60 % seedlings of species other than Douglas fir. Alternative planting compositions for conifer sites are: 40 % Douglas fir, 40 % western hemlock, and 20 % red cedar; 60 % DF, 20 % WH, 20 % RC; and 66% DF 34 % RC. Vegetative Structure: In the Puget Sound lowlands, the spatial distribution of plants within a given area is primarily a function of the disturbance history. In general, due to the prevalent logging systems of past decades -- though by no means in all cases - -the longer the time since the last disturbance, the greater the structural diversity within a forest stand, namely: a greater range of tree diameters and tree heights; a greater proportion of shade tolerant and late successional species; and development of multiple canopy layers. Unequal allocation of resources among individual trees accounts for a broad diameter and height distribution, including in even -aged forests. Presence and growth of both shade intolerant and shade tolerant species allow canopy differentiation. The structure of stands, or timber types, on the property has been described earlier. Strategies for increasing structural diversity are: 1) maintain stands of different ages and/or successional stages; 2) provide conditions which yield the elements discussed above. When scheduling commercial thinning, consider a "variable- density" approach. Instead of uniformly thinning the stand, some areas are heavily thinned and other areas are lightly thinned. The exact dimensions are flexible: "heavily" can range from clearcut to 50 % canopy closure; "lightly" can range from no removal to 50 % of the prescribed thinning density. A target distribution of treatments could be 60 % prescription density, 20 % heavily thinned, and 20 % lightly thinned; two patches each of heavily thinned and lightly thinned per acre are recommended. The `variable density" approach can also be applied to precommercial thinning. 21 Habitat Structures: These are biotic or abiotic components of forests which provide benefits to wildlife. Snags are standing dead or dying trees. Over 60 species of wildlife are known to reside in cavities in snags in western Washington. Different sizes and ages can accommodate different species: snags (including stumps) as small as 10 inches in diameter and 6 feet in height are utilized by some bird species. Deformed live trees- - with broken tops, large branches, forks, and other physical defects - -can provide habitat to many species for nesting, perching, and foraging; often decay is associated with the defect. Large woody debris consists of portions of or entire fallen trees, logs, and root wads. Over 100 species of wildlife are known to use large woody debris for nesting, foraging, hiding, and courtship; in addition, it plays an important role in providing fish habitat in most middle order streams. Abiofic habitat structures include cliffs, caves, talus, springs, seeps, wetlands, and watercourses; no such structures (other than wetlands, as described above) are present on the property. • When implementing harvests, snags and defective live trees should be retained, safety permitting. Snags can also be created during harvest, by: leaving high stumps (5 feet or higber); topping; or, girdling. Between 2 and 15 snags per acre are recommended. Cost sharing funds for voluntary snag creation may be available. • When implementing harvests, large woody debris, including tree tops and defective logs, should be retained throughout. 22 VI: CULTURAL RESOURCES A complete inventory of cultural and archeological resources was not conducted as part of this plan. The DNR TRAX system (January 2, 2003 map edition) does not record the presence of known cultural resource sites on the subject property. 23 VII: AESTHETICS AND RECREATION The Oglesby property is not accessible to the public, but is visible at close range from Burk Road, a low - volume secondary road. In past harvests, large Douglas fir have been preferentially retained along Burk Road, which helps mitigate the aesthetic impact of timber harvest. The property provides the landowners with opportunities for dispersed recreation, hiking, and wildlife viewing. The owner wishes to utilize uneven -aged / selection harvest techniques in order to preserve these uses. Immediately west of the residential site is a grove of trees with significant sentimental and aesthetic value to the landowner. It is recommended that a generous buffer be maintained around this site to protect it from impact during harvest operations. The landowner may want to retain an unharvested visual buffer around the residential site to help mitigate the aesthetic impact of timber harvest. 24 VIII: AGROFORESTRY, SPECIAL FOREST PRODUCTS, AND OTHER USES The production of specialty products is not contemplated at this time. 25 Resource Management Recommendations This section describes specific forest management practices to undertake to achieve the landowners' goals and objectives. A brief discussion is provided where appropriate. The reader may wish to acquire "The Woodland Workbook ", an excellent resource which contains background information on many aspects of forest management and defines common forestry terns; it is available for a fee from Oregon State University Extension Service, Peary Hall 119, Corvallis, OR 97331 -5712, 541/737 -3700. It is recommended that the landowner consult with a professional forester prior to conducting specific practices, particular those recommended for later years, to determine their advisability in light of changing circumstances. 1) Consider selective harvest Type 1 and clearcut harvest Type 2 in the next five years. These stands exceed the average rotation age for hardwoods: rate of growth and value appreciation are declining. Although markets for most other species are soft, current hardwood prices are near historic highs; cottonwood is an exception, and it may be advisable to retain this species. Red alder and birch do not respond well to thinning (as evidenced by the high occurrence of recent weather damage and mortality in residual hardwoods in year 2000 selective harvest areas). It is recommended that all hardwood trees in age classes older than 50 years (regardless of current diameter or quality) be removed in the near terns. In order to maximize economy of scale, it is recommended that these areas be harvested as a single unit. Note that it may be advantageous to defer any timber sales until after June 14, 2004 to avoid short term capital gains; it is specifically recommended that the owner confer with a tax advisor and consulting forester to determine the best timing structure of a timber sale to minimize federal tax obligations. Following harvest, replant openings in Type 1 to conifer using plug +l stack at 435 trees per acre (see page 12 for detailed reforestation recommendations). Replant Type 2 with red cedar (or genetically improved 2 -0 stock red alder): conifer is recommended for appropriate sites to afford greater latitude for future uneven aged management. Monitor for brush competition and consider selective chemical application in September of year 1 or 2 in conifer areas. 2) Schedule selective harvest about once per decade thereafter. Monitor markets and stand conditions to determine appropriate cutting strategies. Perform site preparation and replant understocked areas following harvest. Monitor for brush competition and conduct brush control as needed. 3) Consider clearcut harvest Type 3 in about 2030. Red alder does not respond well to thinning (as evidenced by the high occurrence of recent weather damage and mortality in residual hardwoods in year 2000 selective harvest areas). Replant Type 2 with red cedar (or genetically improved 2 -0 stock red alder): conifer is recommended for appropriate sites to afford greater latitude for future uneven aged management. 26 Management Timetable So= Current Actions Consider hardwood harvest Types 1 and 2 Year 1, spring: Replant Year 2, fall: brush control, as needed +5 Year Actions monitor for pathogens and damage comply with RMAP requirements +15 Year Actions monitor for pathogens and damage consider selective harvest Type 1 + 30 Year Actions monitor for pathogens and damage consider clearcut Type 3 consider selective harvest Types 1 and 2 27 Fieure 1: Copy of 1999 aerial photograph showing subdivided Section 5, Township 40 North, Range 2 East, W. M., with Oglesby Tract indicated. No Scale (Original Scale: 1 inch equals approximately 1000 feet) 28 p Figure 2: Detail of Whatcom County Assessor's map for Section 5, Township 40 North, Range 2 East, W. M., with Oglesby Tract indicated.. No Scale J2 33 O s P xux +sn x7U Y507 palC real a I ^• 1�5 dpi P «• i Sa xi65 YEii qW 111 4 M ry ©Y OYIii O No • ' • IR y T'y«w ® ..« arc• xv'i 4 • f• r © AM k._ Y 414 iw AM I 21'A ., ♦a RY9Y VNIC INA x165 . i7o, xd'w O yy1 Y392 ram y ,•5 yrll 1 • .55 ANA » Oi m ay "V Z AnA }`sa xS�Iy y xlYxS v� R•] RW y •» m05-4 Y45Y lxnuc ® ® O i y ZIA y�\� •ltA PZ Val 151x. %1✓ F o9,V y1Y y>� yN+u 1 5.m♦. Yiij An _••w rr MMJEI CI.USIFA YIV! 11 : •5N 1 N-o v� SadiT RAT yg ' ame m ;a Ml Yln ®1f__._ v- olnma• m •way i - i® JI� lots 5 « -u 41>o 3 i .wasw rw; "are Ila%. yWi em. BPS 110 151 it ®fit MMAP01 SC RDIKH x301 w51 I I® � SS y 1 x'MR . T .5. AT A 1; AV •1 " ®aY xy � v s o m »n u • i tp55d • » �� , Figure 3: Timber type map for Oglesby property. Scale: 1 inch equals 400 feet LE6EN� N Wii4 rUnb .-&ter sr"4.'\ Swig& nPE � � nnBF2 rrt� or+rer_ r Al) 9 \4EW ) Srb�JW6 *wF mo„o-w -y 30 7� bfo i F. — II II M($f�t7%/PE I Fy z If — — 11 Hwl> 3 =.�6 i93o s /w,� II II P�'+o,'so'oo f. II II I I i1 II 11 II �\ K DF'o� II II N m /I II N II II %�2'+YtE3 \1 �, II P-kzI JwV6 II 'fie 4 � II LE6EN� N Wii4 rUnb .-&ter sr"4.'\ Swig& nPE � � nnBF2 rrt� or+rer_ r Al) 9 \4EW ) Srb�JW6 *wF mo„o-w -y 30 Figure 4:Forest Practice Activity Map with approximate location of Oglesby Tract indicated. Scale as shown. FOREST PRACTICE ACTIVITY MAP TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH HALF 0, RANGE 2 FAST (W.M.) HALF 0, SECTION 5 Application #: Please use Me ft" fm Me FPA Instrucgon ar ProNe9 a Irst w sy is used. 31 Mor ey, August25,200310:18:03 AM NAD W Contour Inter l: 40 Feet F e � S P f _ °Y_ _ LM h � f r i4 i » -�av LANDOWNER AFFIRMATION We have read this Forest Land Management Plan of 33 pages prepared by John D. Gold of John Gold & Company, Consulting Foresters, August 27, 2003, covering our property in Whatcom County, and it reflects our management objectives. If the portions of the property described in the Plan are accepted for inclusion in a current use taxation and Stewardship Incentives programs, we agree to manage them consistent with the Plan and the standards of the programs to the best of our abilitieess. •� Erin Oglesby - - -- "G " Date WHATCOMCOUNTY APPROVAL (for DFL/OST programs only) I have reviewed this Plan and approve it as meeting the requirements of a Forest Land Management Plan as described in RCW 84.33.130. Print name and title: Date DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUCES APPROVAL (if applying for cost share funds only) I have reviewed this Plan and approve it as meeting the requirements of the Stewardship Incentives Program. Print name and title: Date PAID PREPARER SIGNATURE No' ntjiv other than those specifically acknowledged made significant conttjb iq this Plan. v� Gold Date 33 Nielsen OST 2004 WHA TCOM CO UNTY OPEN SPA CE CLASSIFICATION Property Owner: Eric and Vanessa Nielser Designation: Open Space Timber 3817 Squalicum Lake Rd. Undated TMP Bellingham, WA 98226- 9LParcelNo.: 380418 - 204150 Subarea: Lake Whatcom Parcel Acreage: 9.67 acres Comp. Plan Desig:. Rural Acreage in OST: approx 8.67 acres Zoning Desig.: R5A Road Access: Squalicum Lake Road Shorelines: N/A Land Use: Homesite, forest land. coniferous trees. Land Use History: Homesite and timber land. Soil TITe/Capabilities: Reforest by planting during first season following harvest by planting 150 - 2' Westem red cedar /acre. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement #94 - Labounty silt loam, drained,, 0 - 2% slopes, 85% lot coverage Site Index* 90 - Red alder Limitations/Cdncem Seasonal high water table. #156 - Squalicum gravelly loam, 5-15% slopes, 15% lot coverage Site Index* 132 - Douglas fir Limitations/Concem Seedling establishment. Muddiness caused by seasonal wetness. Timber Management Plan Completeness (0- incomplete; l= satisfactory; 2--thorough) Information Included Points Max Current Stand Description 2 Immature mixed stand of Douglas fir, West. red cedar, hemlock, Red alder, birch and Bigleaf Maple Toss Cr. and Williams Lake anadromous fish beating waters. Soils Description 2 Complete. Forest Health - No mention of insect oopest problems. Harvest Plan 2 Harvest only when high demand for timber or cash need. Thinning Program 2 Continuation of cutting poor form hardwoods for firewood, leaving good immature stand of coniferous trees. Planting/Restocking Program 2 Reforest by planting during first season following harvest by planting 150 - 2' Westem red cedar /acre. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement 2 Maintaining a sustainable timber stand for wildlife habitat through good forest management. TOTAL: 12 14 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Must receive at least 7 points for a staff recommendation of approval 'Site index indicates how tall (in feet) an average tree will grow in 50 years. Neilsen OST 380418 Type I hfixed Conifers with Hardwoods site 11 & In Site Index DF132 & RA90 Age 15-50 Yeats �_- .nM 8,1 Current Owner David W JR & Michele Cnegory purchaser Eric & Vanessa Nelsen Whatcom County Parcel Number 380418 - 204150-0000 Portion of the NE1/4 SWIM Section 18 Township 38 North Range 4 East, WAIL, Whatcom Canty Containing 8.67 + /- Acres Scale I" = 400'