The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutord2005-01211HATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL NO. 2004 -370 CLEARANCES halt Date Date Received in Council 0 se Agenda Date Assi uedto: Originator: Wait W. Aamot 10 -15 -04 p l 1 9 LC34 — - - }1- y� "�i 10 -26 -04 Introduction Division Head: Sylvia Goodwin 504„ 11/9/04 P & D / Council Dept. Head: Hal Hart 11/09/2004 Council Consideration. Prosecutor: KarenFmkes Purchasmg /Budger. £xecunve Ketones Kreen SUBJECT Ordinance nr(opting amendments to the Whatcom Counry Comprehensive Plan relating to transportation impact fee background infmmtation (Appendix G of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan). ATTACHMENTS: (1) Proposed ordinance (2) Planning Commission Findings of Fact & Reasons for Action, Conclusions, and Recommendations ;Vote: Background materials are available or review at the Cousin, Council office. SEPA review required? ( x ) Yes ( J NO SEPA review completed? ( x )Yes ( ) NO Should Clerk schedule a hearing? ( ) Yes ( x) NO Requested Date: t A hearing must be heldif the Council changes lire Planning Conioussion recommendation twee 20.1.110. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Revising Appendix G of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan to provide background information necessary to subsequently adapt a transportation impactfee ordinance. This includes an evaluation of any existing deficiencies in the transportation system, a forecast Offuture traffic including trafefrom new development, and identification of road improvements required to serve new development. Distribution Request indicate those who should overlie a Copy after Couned action List specie name: to the right ADS Facilities Management ADS Finance ADS Human Resources ADS Info Services Assessor Keith Wilinauer Auditor Cooperative Extension District Court Executive Health Hearing Examiner Jail COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 10/26/2004: Introduced 11/9/2004: Forwarded to coccurrency 1/25/2005: Adopted 7 -0r Ord. #2005 -012 Juvenile Parks Planning Hal Han Prosecutor Public Works SherJf Superior Court Related County Contract #: Treasurer Other Related File Numbers: AB2004 -081 Ordinance or Resolution Number (this item): Ord. #2005 -012 12 Planning Division AComp Plan AmendmentvCnmp Plan 20MVCMP2004 -00024 (Appendix 0) - AB doe I0 -15 -04 SPONSORED BY: nta.,ning PROPOSED BY: n� ��,,; ,,,. INTRODUCTIONDAtn --10/26/04 ORDINANCE # 2005 -012 ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE WHATCOM COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE BACKGROUND INFORMATION WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act requires counties and cities to review and, if needed, revise comprehensive plans to ensure continued compliance with the GMA (RC W 36.70A.130); and WHEREAS, Review of the capital facilities element occurred in the 2004 review cycle; and WHEREAS, Legal notice was published in the Bellingham Herald; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposal; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has evaluated the proposed amendments and made modifications; and WHEREAS, the County Council has considered the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact & Reasons for Action, Conclusions and Recommendations. The Council makes the following findings of fact and conclusions: FINDINGS OF FACT Notice of the Planning Commission hearing for the subject amendment was sent to city planners, the Whatcom Council of Governments, Tribal representatives and other govemment agency representatives on September 22, 2004. 2. Notice of the Planning Commission hearing for the subject amendment was mailed to libraries and schools on September 23, 2004, with a request to post the notice on their bulletin boards. 3. Notice of the Planning Commission hearing for the subject amendment was posted on the County's website on September 24, 2004. P. 1 4. Notice of the Planning Commission hearing for the subject amendment was published in the Bellingham Herald on October 2, 2004. 5. A determination of non - significance was issued under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) on October 11, 2004. 6. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject amendment on October 14, 2004. 7. Growth Management Act (GMA) planning goal # 12 is to "Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards" (RCW 36.70A.020(12)). S. County-Wide Planning Policy L -1 states "The county and the cities are encouraged to adopt fair and reasonable impact and /or mitigation fee ordinances to ensure that new growth pays its fair share of the cost of capital facilities, such as transportation improvements, parks, and schools." 9. Action Plan item # 4 in the Transportation chapter of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan is to: Create a system for level of service measurements which allows the county to assess the impact of growth- related additional vehicle trips on existing roads. Use this measurement in identifying needed improvements in capital facilities planning, and in establishing impact and/or mitigation fees, or in determining the desirability of the area to be serviced for additional growth. 10. Action Plan item # 7 in the Transportation chapter of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan states: "Within 12 months of adoption of the plan by the County Council, develop an impact and /or mitigation fee ordinance based on actual impacts." The ordinance inserting the 12 -month time frame in this Action Plan item was adopted in 2003 (Ordinance 2003 -012). 11. The Technical Advisory Committee has worked to develop a proposed transportation impact fee ordinance in 2004. However, pursuant to the provisions of state law, the authorization to collect impact fees is contingent upon the County identifying certain information in the capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan (RCW 82.02.050(4)). This information includes deficiencies in the transportation system serving existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be eliminated, additional demands placed on existing transportation facilities by new development, and additional transportation improvements required to serve new development. P 12. The Whatcom County Division of Engineering evaluated potential deficiencies in the existing transportation system, defined as those roads that do not meet the level of service standards in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan, The Division of Engineering compared traffic counts taken from 1999 -2004 to the capacity of the roads. The result was a volume/capacity (V//C) ratio for each road examined. Based upon a comparison of the current V/C ratios for County roads to the adopted V/C ratios contained in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan, all arterial and collector roads in unincorporated Whatcom County currently meet the level of service standard in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. There are no level of service deficiencies that must be eliminated. 13. The Whatcom Council of Governments (WCOG), with the assistance of a consultant, has been working to develop a computer transportation model over the last several years. In the fall of 2004, the computer transportation model results were made available to the County. The computer transportation model forecasts total daily traffic volumes, p.m. peak hour traffic volumes, traffic related to new growth, and future levels of service in 2022. These traffic volumes and conditions are depicted in Appendix G of the Comprehensive Plan. 14. Transportation improvements needed to serve new development are identified in Appendix G. It is recognized that these projects would serve both new and existing land uses. Pursuant to the provisions of state law, any impact fees paid by new development to finance a portion of these improvements would be proportional to the traffic impacts throughout the County created by the new development. CONCLUSIONS The subject amendment is consistent with Growth Management Act, County Wide Planning Policies, and Whatcom County Comprehensive. 2. The subject amendment complies with the approval criteria for comprehensive plan amendments of WCC 20.10.080. V. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Whatcom County Council that: Section 1. Appendix G of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan relating to transportation impact fee background information is hereby amended as shown on Exhibit A. Section 2. Adjudication of invalidity of any of the sections, clauses, or provisions of this ordinance shall not affect or impair the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. ADOPTED this 25 day of .lane, 2005 WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL ATTEST: WHATCOM COUNTY. WASHINGTON APPROVED as to form: Civil Deputy Prosecutor P. 4 t-%`D �i Laurie caskey- schreiber, Council Chair Approved () Denied -Pete Kremen, Executive Date: 1-01K`195 2004 Update Appendix G — Transportation Model EXHIBIT A Planning Commission Approved Version — 10114104 Appendix G TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE - BACKGROUND INFORMATION TM99€L RUN Note: The text below is new in its entirety, except for text with strike - throughs. Underlining is unnecessary to distinguish new text from existing text. Therefore, underlining has been omitted to make the text easier to read. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS State Law Requirements State law requires that, prior to collecting transportation impact fees, the Comprehensive Plan must identify deficiencies in public streets and roads that serve existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be eliminated within a reasonable period of time (RCW 82.02.050(4)(a)). Procedure The Whatcom County Division of Engineering counts traffic on County roads each year. The Division of Engineering took the p.m. peak hour volumes from 1999 to 2004 and divided these counts by the capacity of the roads. The result is a volume /capacity or V/C ratio. The V/C ratios were then compared to level of service standards set forth in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan to determine whether any roads were "deficient," which means that the V/C ratio exceeds the level of service standard. Results The analysis of V/C ratios performed by the Whatcom County Division of Engineering did not show any County roads that are currently deficient in meeting the level of service standards set forth in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. PROJECTED 2022 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS State Law Requirements State law requires that the County's Comprehensive Plan must identify additional demands placed on existing public streets and roads by new development (RCW 82.02.050(4)(b)). 2004 Update Appendix G - Transoortation Model Procedure The Whatcom Council of Governments contracted with a consultant to develop a computer transportation model to project future traffic on County roads. The computer transportation model assumed that the total Whatcom County population would grow from 166,814 people in 2000 to 234,917 people in the year 2022, consistent with the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the transportation model utilized projected population growth for each urban growth area as distributed by the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. The population assumptions incorporated into the transportation model are shown below. 2000 Population (Based on 2000 City Limlts) 3000 Population- (Cities Include UGAs) Projected -. 3022 Populaton ] (Cites Intlu4e upas 2000 -2022 Not Growth Chios .include UBae Bellingham 67,171 78,040 113,055 35,015 Blaine 3,770 4,779 7,942 3,163 Everson 2,035 2,256 3,912 1,656 Ferndale 8,758 9,934 17,322 7,388 L nden 9,020 9,604 16,900 7,296 Noeksack 851 895 1,881 986 Bumas 978 995 1,669 674 BYbtOGI 92,583 106,503 162,681 56,176 Unincorpora[etl W haMOm Coun 74,231 60,311 72,236 11,925 Total Whatcom County 166,814 188,814 234,917 68,103 2004 Update Appendix G Transportation Model The computer transportation model assumed that total Whatcom County employment would grow from 83,195 jobs in 2000 to 116,288 jobs in 2022. Projected employment utilized in the transportation model was derived from the "baseline forecast' from Whatcom County Population and Economic Forecasts (ECONorthwest, May 2002), with the exception of agriculture and mining employment, which were not evaluated by the ECONorthwest study. The Whatcom Council of Governments computer transportation model assumed that the following major road improvements would be constructed by 2022: Road Location Improvement Blaine/Birch Bay Area SR 543 Boblett to Border Widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes Lincoln Rd (Birch Point Connector) Shintaffer Rd to Birch Pt Rd. New 2 -lane road Lincoln Rd Harborview Rd to Blaine Rd Reconstruction and new 2 -lane road Bellingham Area West Illinois St W Illinois to Marine Dr New 2 -lane road San Juan Blvd Elwood to San Juan Blvd New 2 -lane road Lakeway Dr Yew St to Electric Ave Add west bound lane Sunset Dr Woburn to City Limits Widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes 1 -5 South Bound Ohio on -ramp to Lakeway off Widen to 3lanes 1 -5 South Bound Lakeway off -ramp Widen to 2 lanes Mid County Area SR 539 (Guide Meridian) Horton Rd to SR 546 (Badger) Widen to 4 lanes Lynden Drayton St Extension 2nd St to Depot Rd New 2 -lane road Femdale Nordic Way Connector Nordic Way to LaBounty Dr New 2 -lane road Main St/1 -5 Overpass Widen to 4lanes Sumas Area SR 9 South of Sumas Realign Garrison Rd North of SR 9 Close due to realignment Results The results of this computer model are displayed on three attached maps: Map # G1 Forecasted Total Daily Traffic for 2022 - Depicts total projected daily traffic on County and State roads for 2022, including the percentage of traffic generated by new development from 2000 -2022. 2004 Update Appendix G Transportation Model Map # G2 Forecasted P.M. Peak Hour Traffic for 2022 — Depicts projected p.m. peak hour traffic on County roads for 2022, including the percentage of p.m. peak hour traffic generated by new development from 2000 -2022. Map # G3 Forecasted P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service for 2022 — Depicts projected p.m. peak hour level of service, in a volume /capacity ratio, for 2022. It must be noted that the City of Bellingham is in the process of forecasting traffic for the City and urban growth area using its own computer transportation model. The County will consider incorporating the results from this model in future Comprehensive Plan updates in order to refine the analysis for the Bellingham urban growth area. Identification of Transportation Projects to Serve New Development State Law Requirement State law requires that impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities defined in RCW 82.02.090 (including roads) that are addressed by a capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive land use plan (RCW 82.02.050(4)). State law also requires that the County's Comprehensive Plan must identify additional transportation facility improvements required to serve new development (RCW 82.02.050(4)(c)). Procedure Road projects completed in the last six -years and related costs were derived from Whatcom County Public Works Department records. Road projects proposed in the next six years were derived from the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program. Projects that weren't reasonably related to the impacts of new development (i.e. maintenance projects that would have to be completed even if there wasn't any new growth) were omitted from the list of projects for which impact fees could be collected. Results Whatcom County has identified transportation facility improvements necessary to serve new development as shown below. 2004 Update Appendix G- Transportation Model Completed Road Projects 1999 - 2004 .n_ L , Birch Bay L nden Road Blaine Rd to Harborview Rd $175,415 $175,415 Harborview Road Birch Ha Dr to One ton Harbor Rd $173,114 $173,114 ee Drive Gulf Rd to APA Rd $739,296 $739,296 Birch Bay Drive Shoulder Overlay $754,970 $754,970 Haxton Road Balch Rd to Hamden Rd $1,043,036 $1,043,036 Van W ck Road Easterly from SR 539 $212,971 $212,971 Northwest Drive B'ham C/L to W Axton Rd $1,008599 $1,008,599 Grandview Rd 1 -5 to Ente rise Rd $169,029 $169,029 Rainbow Road Mountain View Rd to Kickerville Rd $307,973 $307,973 Stein Road Brid e # 92 Dakota Creek $97,915 $363,886 Smith Rd /Hann an Rd Si net $695,564 $695,564 Grandview Road Jackson Rd to SR 548 $386,243 $386,243 Slater Road Overla $227,103 $227,103 E Bakerview Rd /James St Si nal $341,657 $684,043 Far Quein & Terminal Facildies Lummi Is & Gooseberry Pt $543,456 $917,453 James St/Telegraph Rd Turn Lanes $493,626 $493,626 Count Lane /Bancroft Road Marne Or to Curtis Lane $739,753 $739,753 Lummi Shore Road Hermosa Beach/Cagey/Portage $650,416 $650,416 Park Road Isouth Be Rd to SR 9 $3,979,876 $4,979,876 Lake Terrell Road Slater Rd to Mountainview Rd $595,380 $2,051,305 Mountain View Road Lake Terrell Rd to Rainbow Rd $618,523 $738,859 Airport Dr /Alderwood Ave Bennett Or to Marine Or $590,391 $1,502,934 Slater Road Railroad Crossing to 1 -5 $384,463 $384,463 Yew St Road B'ham C/L to Samish $2,265,602 $3,551,104 W Smith Rd Ferndale Cit Limits to Northwest Dr $1,723,589 $1,723,589 Samish Way 1 -5 to B'ham City Limits $1 489,867 $1,489,867 Jackson Road Bride North of Grandview Rd $140170 $1401170 Truck Road Gravel Conversion $56,579 $56,579 Kwina Road IHaxton Rd to Lummi Shore Rd $1,448,170 $1,872,782 Lakewa /Terrace Ave B'ham to Lakewa $325,000 $325,000 Cain Lake Rd Ska it Co Line to Lake Whatcom 81 $964,598 $964,598 ustin Creek lBridge $1,373,276 $1,373,276 Mosquito Lake Rd IRealignment $382,453 $382,453 Total $25,098,074 $31,279,347 2004 Update AoDendix G - Transportation Model Road Projects on Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program 2005 -2010 $2,200000 $2,808,216 Sunrise Road Bitch Bay Lynden CN S608,216 to W Bad eT RD Reconstruction Lake Whaleom Blvd N $1,159,823 $196,817 $500,000 $3,00,000 $4,856,640 Hi hBrid eg115 Brid ere Iacement Mwgoito Lake Rd PE, RW, CN $100,752 $42,635 $22,000 5608,000 $773,387 Humhinson CY Bridge replacement Brid e415] Frost Rd, Culver/ CNCulVeW $770,724 5535,000 $1,305,724 Brid eRe Iacement Bridge re Iacement Lummi View Drive Lummi Shore Rd CN Reconstruction and $502,653 $700,000 $1,202,653 west 2 miles cal' me " Marine Drive Bennett Drive to PE, RW, CN $113,722 $944,000 5498,000 51,555,322 Locust St Reconstruction and nan- motorize0 enhancements Tyre Drive Benson Rd to PE, RW, CN $]2,830 $390,000 $862,830 Roosevelt Rd Reconstruction and non- motorized enhancements Patter Rd South Fork PE, RW, CN 51]8,948 $]4,162 $2,460,000 $1,720,000 $4,433,110 Bird ctt148 Nooksaek Re Iacement BNSF /Saxon Rd E, DN Upgrade crossing 55,000 $506 $150,000 $155,506 Railroad Crossing wiNsi alarms Hillsdale Rd Culvert Brownsville Rd PE, RW, CN $8,000 $270,000 $278,000 Replacement west0,1 mile Culverro Iacement Innis Creek Rd Wickersham Rd PE, RW, CN $8,000 5320,000 $328000 north 03 mile Fish passage and drain e u older Yew Street Rd Samish Waym PE, RW, CN $159,282 $6,399 $2,154,000 $1,721,000 $4,040,679 Phase Kingsmill Reconstruction and nan- motorized enhancements Cable Street Lakeview St to PE, RW, CN $14,906 $1,020,000 SI,U34,9U6 Lake Whatcom Blvd Reconstruction, water quality improvement and non -mo punted enhancements iAantiegan Rd/ PE, RW, CN $30,300 $1,400,000 $600,000 $2,030,306 SR 544 Intersection Si nalization Sletr<Rd Imhoff Rd PE, RW, CN $370,000 $370,000 intersection Install mm lanes Curis RdBuml AVe Country Landto PE, RW, CN $3,420,000 $500,000 $3,920,000 Slater Rd Reconstruction and non- motorized enhancements I lnmpmn Rd PE,RW, CN $8,000 $4,00,000 $4,008,000 2004 Update Appendix G - Transportation Model Mormon Ditch Bridge replacement Brid e#261 Hannegan Rd Kelly Rd, E Laurel Rd PE, RW, CN $1,000 $550,000 S551,000 Intersections Ten-Mile Rd, Intersection safety Van Dyk Rd improvements including left turn lanes Kickers ille Road Rainbow Rd to PE, RW, CN 5466,000 52,024,000 52,490,000 SR 548 Reconstmction Lake Louise Road Sudden Valley gate PE,RW H2,344 $730,000 $372,344 13 to Austin St Reconstruction Lincoln Road Shintaffer Rd to PE, RW $30,255 $360,000 $390,255 SR 548 Reconstruction, new mad Grandview/Point Birch Bay Dr to PE, RW $68,683 $105,000 $173,683 Whitehom Jackson Rd Reconstmction Vista Drive Femdale City limits PE, RW, CN $14,255 $310,000 $500,000 S824,255 to SR 548 Reconstruction Heston Way Kwina Rd to PE, RW $90,000 $90,000 Slater Rd Structural overla West Illinois/ WIllinois to PE $10,000 $10,000 Taman Way Marine Dr ass roadwa West Badger Rd Sunrise Rd to PE, RW, CN 520,776 54,409 $30,00 $500,000 S555,185 Markworth Rd Reconstruction EavNorth Lake Intersection PE, RW Sir $40,000 $40,016 Samish Drive im rovement Intersection Improvement Lincoln Road/ Lincoln Rd to PE, RW $145,000 $145,000 Birch Pt Connector Birch Paint New roadway Slater Road Flood 5.16 to 7,36 PE $30,000 $30000 ProoOn Lake Whatcom Blvd Rocky Ridge to PE, RW $19,532 $100,000 $119,532 Lake Louise Rd Reconstruction Slater Road/Red Bridge replacement PE, RW $225,000 $225,000 River Bridge #513 Bridge re lacement North Shore Road B'ham to Y Rd IPE, RW Reconstruction $11,067 $130000 $141,067 West Smith Road/ Intersection PE $30,000 530,000 Northwest Drive In avement Intersection Improvement South Pass Rd Goodwin Rd to PE, RW, CN $240,000 $500,000 5740,000 SR 54] Reconstruction Marine Drive Locust Street to PE, RW 52,345 $80,000 $82,345 Bancroft Rd Reconstruction 1 ake Whatcom Cable St to PE, RW 525,960 $130,000 $155,960 Boulevard 2 Stmwbe Pt Rd Reconstruction Mamma View Rd Lake Terrell Rd to PE, RW, CN $400,000 $500,000 5900,000 Femdale Ct limits Reconstruction Harborvicw Road Lincoln Rd to PE, RW E1 ]0,000 51]0,000 Dra ton Harbor Rd Reconstruction marine Drive Kwina Rd to PE, RW SISQ000 $150,000 Ferndale Rd Reconstmction and non- 2004 Update Appendix G - Transportation Model Total Notes: PE = Preliminary Engineering RW = Acquiring right of way CN = Construction $23,101,000 $44,249,931 Immunized enhancements Birch Bay Lynden Rd Rehainlimtion PE, RW S80,000 $80000 Benrend Cr Brid ep56 Rehabilitation Benson Road Nee Dr to PE $50,000 $50,000 Bounda Ba Rd Reconstruction Lake Louise Road 2 Lake Whatcom Blvd PE, RW $200,000 M,000 to Sudden Valley Reconstruction ate 13 Van Wyck ROad Ilannegan Rd to PE, RW $200,000 52W,OW SR 542 Reconstruction Femdale ROed Slater Rd to PE, RW $140,000 $140,000 Femdale Ci limits Reconstruction, mm lanes H Street Road Blaine City limits to PE, RW $140,000 $140,000 SR 539 Reconstruction Kickers ille Road 2 SR 548 to Birch PE, RW $200,000 $200,000 Bay L nden Rd Roeonstruaio0 Birch Bay Drive Alderson Rd to PE. $30,000 $30,000 Harborview Rd Sidewalk Birch Point Road Semiahmoo Dr to PE 530,000 $30,W0 Birch Bay Village Reconstruction Semiahmoo Road Birch Point Rd to PE, RW $200,000 $200,000 Blaine Ci limits Reconswction West Lake Samish Dr Nufle Rd to PE, RW $150,000 $150,000 Lake Samish Dr Reconstruction, Improve Van Bunn Road/ Hampton Road to PE, RW $25,414 $155,000 $180,414 Lindsay ROad SR 546 Reconstruction East Smith Road/ Intersection PE $5,000 55,000 SR 542 Si naloistioo Siper Rand SR9to PE $5,00 $5,000 Ho ewellRd Reconstruction Grandview Road/ Grandview Rd to PE $50,000 550,000 W Pole Rd Connector W Pale Rd WTa com Connector Yew St Rd to PE $200,000 S200,000 Lake Louise Rd East Herron Road Ten Mile Cr PE Reconstruction 540,000 540,000 Total Notes: PE = Preliminary Engineering RW = Acquiring right of way CN = Construction $23,101,000 $44,249,931 2004 Update Appendix G — Transportation Model as66iFApt on to 6ix numbers trip table year L16 Roa GGAYBF640n Fatio. ProjeG Yeimf S;.Sa'mish CnnneGtnr . Arld a stFeetGORReGfing these roads thP Ae MeF dRR hpb.'.fPPRHpmmo RpAd _ RAth of _ _ ___ _ _ __ IGGAt :• . hph--reen 0.85 And ..... Rnad __..._. 10 YEAR RUN ProGeGfyFe ryj 'em Nim 2004 Update Appendix G — Transportation Motlel FORM go Rom 'll WIN 10 =b 1 y {¢ 4y r ^•rraW�: ' OS3 acy r nt Ail II z r 'EI x i e ry — Y LF OT IImIz svX42 I ni au / ... r..—. ,r r� e;e — �F I SUI kv T 'i fop d bsk� Y � Mfr <r li -' Y`'dfF * §�.��j�'Y'g�Yb,1 �� Vim, ■ L.1 SFifM